Skip to main content
. 2025 May 12;15(20):15497–15504. doi: 10.1039/d5ra01949d

Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditionab.

graphic file with name d5ra01949d-u1.jpg
Entry AD Oxidant Solvent T (°C) Yield (%)
1 TBHP PhCl 120 0
2 I2 TBHP PhCl 120 9
3 HI TBHP PhCl 120 21
4 NaI TBHP PhCl 120 17
5 KI TBHP PhCl 120 11
6 NaIO4 TBHP PhCl 120 59
7 CuI TBHP PhCl 120 27
8 AgI TBHP PhCl 120 8
9 FeI2 TBHP PhCl 120 33
10 ZnI2 TBHP PhCl 120 34
11 NaIO4 DTBP PhCl 120 7
12 NaIO4 H2O2 PhCl 120 5
13 NaIO4 TBHP Dioxane 120 18
14 NaIO4 TBHP Toluene 120 37
15 NaIO4 TBHP TBAC 120 54
16 NaIO4 TBHP DMSO 120 21
17 NaIO4 TBHP DMF 120 25
18 NaIO4 TBHP Toluene + PhCl 120 45
19 NaIO4 TBHP PhCl 100 19
20 NaIO4 TBHP PhCl 110 36
21 NaIO4 TBHP PhCl 130 48
22 NaIO4 TBHP PhCl 120 62c, 70d, 65e
23 NaIO4 TBHP PhCl 120 42g, 18h
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.5 mmol), additive (20 mol%), oxidant (1.5 mmol), solvent (4 mL), 12 h, temperature 100–130 °C in sealed tube.

b

Yield of isolated product based on 1a.

c

30 mol% additive was used.

d

40 mol% additive was used.

e

50 mol% additive was used.

g

1 mmol of 2a.

h

0.5 mmol of 2a was added.