Skip to main content
BMC Gastroenterology logoLink to BMC Gastroenterology
. 2025 May 13;25:368. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03955-3

Association of biological aging and the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based study

Gang Liu 1, Qingsong Mao 2, Xinling Tian 3, Chenwei Zhang 4,5, Yukai Zhang 6, Jiarong He 7, Yuzhe Kong 3,
PMCID: PMC12070789  PMID: 40360998

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the relationship between biological aging and the prevalence of NAFLD.

Method

We used the recommended sampling weights to account for the complex survey design of NHANES. The analysis, utilizing data from 2005 to 2016, aimed to investigate the impact of biological aging on NAFLD prevalence using various statistical methods. A restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was applied to explore the dose-response relationship, while logistic regression examined linear associations. The robustness of the association across different subgroups was also tested.

Result

The study included 2786 participants. We found significant associations between NAFLD and the following biological aging metrics: AL score (OR (95%CI) = 1.1932 (1.0597 ~ 1.3435), P = 0.0035), HD (OR (95%CI) = 1.2092 (1.0565 ~ 1.3839), P = 0.0058), and PA (OR (95%CI) = 1.7564 (1.1949 ~ 2.5818), P = 0.0042). All biological aging metrics were identified as independent predictors. PA was most associated with the prevalence of NAFLD. The associations persisted across most subgroups.

Conclusion

The prevalence of NAFLD was associated with biological aging, emphasizing the importance of addressing potential health risks related to aging.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-025-03955-3.

Keywords: Klemera-doubal method biological age, Phenotypic age, Homeostatic dysregulation, Allostatic load, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, National health and nutrition examination survey

Introduction

Over the past two decades, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has emerged as a leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The global pooled prevalence of NAFLD is currently estimated at 30% [14]. Individuals with NAFLD face an increased risk of premature mortality, not only due to liver-related causes but also from cardiovascular disease and extrahepatic cancers [5, 6]. Aging is considered a key factor contributing to many chronic metabolic diseases. Chronological age (CA), based on birth date, is traditionally used to assess aging. However, individuals with the same CA can experience varying rates of aging, suggesting that CA may not accurately reflect the true extent of aging in different individuals.

Biological aging refers to the progressive decline in system integrity with age [7]. It is thought to result from the accumulation of molecular changes, or “hallmarks,” that impair the function and resilience of tissues and organs, eventually leading to disease and death [812], and homeostatic dysregulation (HD) [13] are among the most advanced algorithms for estimating biological aging. KDM-BA (Klemera-Doubal Method Biological Age) is based on the Klemera-Doubal model to estimate the biological age of an individual. The model predicts the biological age of an individual by analyzing data such as blood biochemical indexes to assess the degree of aging.PA (Phenotypic Age) is the biological age estimated based on an individual’s phenotypic data (e.g., body weight, blood pressure, blood glucose, etc.). It reflects the difference between an individual’s physiological state and his or her actual age. HD (Homeostatic Dysregulation) refers to homeostatic dysregulation, which estimates biological age by assessing the degree of homeostatic dysregulation of body systems. A higher degree of homeostatic dysregulation usually means that the individual is biologically older. The Aging Index (AL) is a combination of biomarkers that assesses the degree of aging in an individual, with higher AL levels indicating more severe aging.The discrepancy between these biological aging metrics and chronological age, known as biological age acceleration (BAA) [14], has been shown to predict mortality in various populations [12, 15].

This study aims to investigate the relationship between biological aging and the prevalence of NAFLD using NHANES data.

Method

Study population

This study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), overseen by the CDC’s Center for Health Statistics. The survey focuses on the U.S. population living outside of institutions and employs a stratified multistage sampling design to represent the national demographic profile (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm). Health and nutritional data were initially collected through personal interviews, mobile unit examinations, and various laboratory tests.

Ethical approval

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethic approval received from NCHS Ethics Review Board (Protocol #2011-17 and Protocol #2005-06).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Initially, 8958 participants were included, where 4953 participants were excluded because of missing data. Further, 1307 were excluded because of the significant alcohol use and the prevalence of liver diseases. Thus, 2786 participants were finally included. (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Study flowchart

Calculation of biological aging

Our study included four biological aging indicators: Klemera-Doubal method biological age (KDM-BA), PA, homeostatic dysregulation (HD), and allostatic load (AL) [16, 17]. Aging acceleration was assessed by calculating both KDM-BA and PA acceleration [16]. Further details can be found in the cited references.

Outcome assessment

Diagnosis of NAFLD was defined as FLI ≥ 60.

The Fatty Liver Index (FLI) serves as a non-invasive diagnostic method employing simple clinical metrics to evaluate metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and related hepatic lipid accumulation, demonstrating broad applicability in both research and clinical settings. FLI scores are stratified into three principal tiers: values below 30 indicate minimal risk of liver fat deposition; 30–60 corresponds to moderate risk, necessitating supplemental diagnostic assessments to confirm intermediate-stage steatosis; and ≥ 60 strongly correlates with advanced steatosis, warranting a definitive fatty liver diagnosis. Validation studies affirm FLI’s reliability as a screening tool for metabolic-driven hepatic steatosis.

Covariates

In our analysis, we included key covariates identified in previous studies [1828], such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, family poverty income ratio (PIR), alcohol consumption, smoking habits, diabetes, and hypertension.

NHANES classifies race/ethnicity into categories such as Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and a group that includes non-Hispanic Asians and multiracial individuals. Education levels range from below ninth grade to a college degree or higher. Marital status is categorized from married to unspecified, reflecting diverse family structures. PIR is calculated based on annual income relative to poverty thresholds, adjusted for family size.

Alcohol consumption is recorded if an individual consumes at least 12 alcoholic beverages annually. Smoking status is determined by whether an individual has smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. Both diabetes and hypertension are self-reported but verified by medical professionals.

Statistical analysis

To account for the NHANES survey design, we applied sampling weights in our analysis. For statistical evaluation, we used the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for rare categorical data. All biological aging metrics have been Z-scored.

Initially, we employed a restricted cubic spline (RCS) model to explore the relationship between biological aging metrics and the prevalence of NAFLD. The number of spline knot was 4, and the median was the refered (OR = 1). Logistic regression was then used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for NAFLD prevalence in relation to biological aging. Model I was unadjusted, while Model II included adjustments for all covariates as specified in Sect. 2.6. Additionally, we identified independent predictors through logistic regression models. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the consistency of the associations across different groups.

All statistical analyses were adjusted for demographic variables and performed using R software version 4.3.3, with a significance level set at P < 0.05 [29, 30].

Result

General information

A total of 2786 participants were included in our study, with a NAFLD prevalence rate of 40.06%. When divided into two groups based on NAFLD prevalence, significant differences were observed between the groups in gender, age, race and ethnicity, education, marital status, cigarette use, hypertension, diabetes status, and all biological aging metrics (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1.

General information

Non-NAFLD NAFLD P
Population 1670 (59.94%) 1116 (40.06%)
Gender < 0.0001
Male 792 (47.43%) 659 (59.05%)
Female 878 (52.57%) 457 (40.95%)
Age 49.35 ± 17.93 52.45 ± 15.48 < 0.0001
Race and Ethnicity 0.0001
Mexican American 187 (11.2%) 162 (14.52%)
Other Hispanic 151 (9.04%) 123 (11.02%)
Non-Hispanic White 884 (52.93%) 556 (49.82%)
Non-Hispanic Black 297 (17.78%) 216 (19.35%)
Other Race - Including Multi-Racial 151 (9.04%) 59 (5.29%)
Educational Background < 0.0001
Less than 9th grade 96 (5.75%) 84 (7.53%)
9-11th grade (Includes 12th grade with no diploma) 173 (10.36%) 106 (9.5%)
High school graduate/GED or equivalent 302 (18.08%) 264 (23.66%)
Some college or AA degree 500 (29.94%) 377 (33.78%)
College graduate or above 599 (35.87%) 285 (25.54%)
Marital Status 0.0003
Married 905 (54.19%) 666 (59.68%)
Widowed 109 (6.53%) 78 (6.99%)
Divorced 197 (11.8%) 138 (12.37%)
Separated 37 (2.22%) 30 (2.69%)
Never married 294 (17.6%) 125 (11.2%)
Living with partner 128 (7.66%) 79 (7.08%)
PIR 2.95 ± 1.64 2.93 ± 1.6 0.7918
Drinking 0.0502
No 207 (12.4%) 168 (15.05%)
Yes 1463 (87.6%) 948 (84.95%)
Smoking 0.0012
No 927 (55.51%) 549 (49.19%)
Yes 743 (44.49%) 567 (50.81%)
Hypertension < 0.0001
No 1233 (73.83%) 580 (51.97%)
Yes 437 (26.17%) 536 (48.03%)
Diabetes < 0.0001
No 1575 (94.31%) 933 (83.6%)
Yes 95 (5.69%) 183 (16.4%)
Biological Aging
AL Score 0.19 ± 0.15 0.27 ± 0.16 < 0.0001
HD 1.94 ± 0.46 2.22 ± 0.56 < 0.0001
KDM 39.36 ± 25.44 40.57 ± 21.81 < 0.0001
PA 59.86 ± 20.05 67.04 ± 17.88 < 0.0001

Dose-response association between biological aging metrics and the prevalence of NAFLD

A restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was used to examine the dose-response relationship between biological aging metrics and the prevalence of NAFLD. The unadjusted model showed a positive association between the AL score and HD with NAFLD prevalence, an inverted U-shaped association between KDM and the prevalence of NAFLD and a J-shaped association between PA and the prevalence of NAFLD (P < 0.0001) (Figure S1). After adjusting for all covariates, the association remained significant (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Dose-response association between biological aging metrics and the prevalence of NAFLD (Adjusted) Note: a) AL score; b) HD; c) KDM; d) PA

Association between biological aging metrics and the prevalence of NAFLD

Logistic regression was applied to confirm the relationships between biological aging metrics and NAFLD prevalence. In the adjusted model, NAFLD prevalence was significantly associated with AL score (OR (95%CI) = 1.1932 (1.0597 ~ 1.3435), P = 0.0035), HD (OR (95%CI) = 1.2092 (1.0565 ~ 1.3839), P = 0.0058), and PA (OR (95%CI) = 1.7564 (1.1949 ~ 2.5818), P = 0.0042) (Table 2). AL score, HD, and PA were identified as independent predictors (Table 2). Among them, PA was most associated with the prevalence of NAFLD.

Table 2.

Association between biological aging metrics and the prevalence of NAFLD

Variables Single Factor Multiple Factor
β S.E Z P OR (95%CI) β S.E Z P OR (95%CI)
Model I: Unadjusted
AL Score 0.4965 0.0417 11.9082 <.0001 1.6430 (1.5141 ~ 1.7829) 0.2421 0.0539 4.4933 <.0001 1.2740 (1.1463 ~ 1.4159)
HD 0.5507 0.0441 12.4856 <.0001 1.7345 (1.5908 ~ 1.8911) 0.2982 0.0562 5.3106 <.0001 1.3475 (1.2070 ~ 1.5042)
KDM 0.045 0.0394 1.1435 0.2528 1.0461 (0.9684 ~ 1.1300) -0.2181 0.0556 -3.9237 <.0001 0.8041 (0.7211 ~ 0.8966)
PA 0.3745 0.0406 9.2213 <.0001 1.4543 (1.3430 ~ 1.5748) 0.2716 0.0635 4.2784 <.0001 1.3121 (1.1586 ~ 1.4859)
Model II: Adjusted
AL Score 0.4965 0.0417 11.9082 <.0001 1.6430 (1.5141 ~ 1.7829) 0.1766 0.0605 2.9177 0.0035 1.1932 (1.0597 ~ 1.3435)
HD 0.5507 0.0441 12.4856 <.0001 1.7345 (1.5908 ~ 1.8911) 0.1899 0.0689 2.7581 0.0058 1.2092 (1.0565 ~ 1.3839)
KDM 0.045 0.0394 1.1435 0.2528 1.0461 (0.9684 ~ 1.1300) 0.2107 0.1306 1.6134 0.1067 1.2345 (0.9558 ~ 1.5946)
PA 0.3745 0.0406 9.2213 <.0001 1.4543 (1.3430 ~ 1.5748) 0.5633 0.1965 2.8661 0.0042 1.7564 (1.1949 ~ 2.5818)

Subgroup analysis

The association between each biological aging metric and NAFLD prevalence was consistent across all subgroups (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Subgroup analysis. Note: a) AL score; b) HD; c) KDM; d) PA

Discussion

In this study, we found that all biological aging metrics were independent predictors and risk factors for the prevalence of NAFLD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the relationship between biological aging and NAFLD prevalence.

As life expectancy continues to rise, the focus on healthy aging is becoming more pronounced, influenced by physiological, psychological, social, and environmental factors. Numerous studies have suggested that biological age is a significant risk factor for various age-related diseases, including chronic, metabolic, and neurodegenerative conditions. Biological aging is a complex process involving multiple biological mechanisms across various organs and systems [31]. Over the past few decades, biological age has been assessed using a variety of biomarkers at the cellular level [32]. Emerging evidence highlights the role of epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, and RNA modifications in aging. Different DNA methylation algorithms have been linked to inflammation, age-related health outcomes, and mortality. Currently, the most accurate measure of biological age is obtained by studying epigenetic changes, such as using epigenetic clocks in blood samples [32].

NAFLD is a common and potentially progressive liver disease strongly associated with an increased risk of both cardiovascular and liver-related mortality [33]. Inflammation plays a central role in the prognosis of NAFLD, contributing to its progression to NASH and liver fibrosis [34]. The potential benefits of anti-inflammatory treatments, such as vitamin E and pentoxifylline, in modulating inflammation and improving NAFLD outcomes are being explored [35]. The metabolic inflammation in NAFLD is a chronic, low-grade, sterile state where monocytes play a key role, producing cytokines that affect insulin signaling and promote NAFLD development [36, 37]. Coexisting diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiovascular disease significantly exacerbate biological aging and NAFLD.NAFLD patients are often accompanied by insulin resistance, which is the pathological basis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.With aging, pancreatic β-cells function declines and insulin secretion decreases, which further aggravates insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, leading to the development of diabetes mellitus, which in turn promotes hepatocyte fatty degeneration and inflammatory responses through Oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress and other mechanisms promote hepatocyte steatosis and inflammatory response, accelerating the progression of NAFLD and biological aging(PMID: 35054837). In addition, the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in NAFLD patients may be related to chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis, and with biological aging, the endothelial function of the blood vessels naturally decreases, blood pressure regulation decreases, and the prevalence of hypertension increases, and high blood pressure further aggravates the burden on the heart and blood vessels, leading to cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial hypertrophy and myocardial infarction and exacerbating the NAFLD. These co-morbidities, through their mutual influence and synergistic effects, form a vicious circle that makes the relationship between aging and NAFLD more complex and difficult to control.

Aging is a multifactorial process that leads to the gradual decline of biological systems, increasing susceptibility to diseases and mortality [38]. Biological age, which reflects the functional and physiological status of an organism rather than its chronological age, can be estimated using biomarkers like clinical chemistry parameters and epigenetic signatures. Previous studies have shown that aging is linked to the prevalence and severity of NAFLD, as well as the risk of liver-related complications and mortality [39, 40]. Early intervention of biological aging indicators aims to regulate the biological processes associated with aging and thus is expected to play an active role in the prevention and management of NAFLD. From clinical practice, healthy lifestyle interventions, such as rational diet and moderate exercise, can not only slow down aging, but also effectively reduce the risk of NAFLD and improve its condition, while some drugs with anti-aging effects have also shown potential efficacy in NAFLD. In addition, monitoring of biological aging indicators can help in early identification of people at risk of NAFLD and assessment of disease progression. In the future, with the in-depth study of the relationship between aging and NAFLD, the development of precise monitoring technology and the formulation of personalised intervention strategies, early intervention of biological aging indicators will show a broader application prospect in the prevention and management of NAFLD, providing new ideas and methods for the clinical prevention and treatment of NAFLD.

In our study we found that PA was most associated with the prevalence of NAFLD. This might be because PA contained inflammation indicators which weren’t included in other 3 indicators. Prior research, including epidemiological investigations and meta-analyses, has established associations between inflammatory biomarkers and hepatic pathologies. For instance, a study involving 376 Chinese individuals with decompensated cirrhosis revealed that elevated NPAR levels independently predicted higher mortality risk after adjusting for covariates [HRQ3vs.Q1 = 1.92; 95% CI (1.04, 3.56)]. Specifically, each unit rise in NPAR was correlated with a 92% increase in the likelihood of death [41]. Additionally, Liu et al. [42], in their analysis of 2017–2018 NHANES datasets, reported that rising NLR and NPAR values were strongly associated with an elevated probability of MASLD development.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study. First, due to its cross-sectional nature, no causal relationships can be established [43]. Although causality could not be established in this study, the results of this study combined with the availability of a large sample of gwas data provide the necessary evidence base for subsequent identification of causal associations through methods such as Mendelian randomization and RCT experiments. Second, the sample size of participants included in the final analysis was relatively small.

Conclusion

A higher prevalence of NAFLD was linked to increased biological aging metrics, underscoring the importance of addressing the potential health risks related to biological aging.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (465.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Wenqi Yang, Haitao Xu and Ruijie Xiao from xiangya school of medicine central south university for their statistical guidance on this manuscript.

Author contributions

QS.M. conducted the formal analysis and wrote the manuscript. YZ.K. critically reviewed the manuscript. JR.H, YK.Z., CW.Z., XL.T. and G.L. prepared all tables and figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethic approval received from NCHS Ethics Review Board (Protocol #2011-17 and Protocol #2005-06).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Le MH, Yeo YH, Li X, Li J, Zou B, Wu Y, et al. 2019 Global NAFLD prevalence: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(12):2809–e281728. 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 7. PMID: 34890795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, Hardy T, Henry L, Eslam M, George J, Bugianesi E. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11–20. 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109. Epub 2017 Sep 20. PMID: 28930295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Le MH, Yeo YH, Zou B, Barnet S, Henry L, Cheung R, Nguyen MH. Forecasted 2040 global prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease using hierarchical bayesian approach. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022;28(4):841–50. 10.3350/cmh.2022.0239. Epub 2022 Sep 19. PMID: 36117442; PMCID: PMC9597215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):123–33. 10.1002/hep.29466. Epub 2017 Dec 1. PMID: 28802062; PMCID: PMC5767767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Loomba R, Friedman SL, Shulman GI. Mechanisms and disease consequences of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell. 2021;184(10):2537–2564. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.015. PMID: 33989548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Sanyal AJ, Van Natta ML, Clark J, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Diehl A, Dasarathy S, et al. Prospective study of outcomes in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(17):1559–69. 10.1056/NEJMoa2029349. PMID: 34670043; PMCID: PMC8881985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kirkwood TB. Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell. 2005;120(4):437– 47. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.027. PMID: 15734677. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Kennedy BK, Berger SL, Brunet A, Campisi J, Cuervo AM, Epel ES, Franceschi C, Lithgow GJ, Morimoto RI, Pessin JE, Rando TA, Richardson A, Schadt EE, Wyss-Coray T, Sierra F. Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease. Cell. 2014;159(4):709–13. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.039. PMID: 25417146; PMCID: PMC4852871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194–217. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039. PMID: 23746838; PMCID: PMC3836174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Levine ME. Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age? J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(6):667–74. 10.1093/gerona/gls233. Epub 2012 Dec 3. PMID: 23213031; PMCID: PMC3660119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Levine ME, Lu AT, Quach A, Chen BH, Assimes TL, Bandinelli S, Hou L, Baccarelli AA, Stewart JD, Li Y, Whitsel EA, Wilson JG, Reiner AP, Aviv A, Lohman K, Liu Y, Ferrucci L, Horvath S. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging. 2018;10(4):573–91. 10.18632/aging.101414. PMID: 29676998; PMCID: PMC5940111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu Z, Kuo PL, Horvath S, Crimmins E, Ferrucci L, Levine M. A new aging measure captures morbidity and mortality risk across diverse subpopulations from NHANES IV: A cohort study. PLoS Med. 2018;15(12):e1002718. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002718. Erratum in: PLoS Med. 2019;16(2):e1002760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002760. PMID: 30596641; PMCID: PMC6312200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Cohen AA, Milot E, Yong J, Seplaki CL, Fülöp T, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried LP. A novel statistical approach shows evidence for multi-system physiological dysregulation during aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 2013;134(3–4):110–7. 10.1016/j.mad.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Jan 31. PMID: 23376244; PMCID: PMC3971434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Horvath S, Raj K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(6):371–384. 10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3. PMID: 29643443. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Parker DC, Bartlett BN, Cohen HJ, Fillenbaum G, Huebner JL, Kraus VB, Pieper C, Belsky DW. Association of blood chemistry quantifications of biological aging with disability and mortality in older adults. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(9):1671–9. 10.1093/gerona/glz219. PMID: 31693736; PMCID: PMC7494046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu X, Zheng J, Li J, Shen Y, Zhu L, Jin Y, Zhang M, Yang S, Du J, Wang H, Chen B, Dong R. Phthalate exposure and markers of biological aging: the mediating role of inflammation and moderating role of dietary nutrient intake. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024;281:116649. Epub 2024 Jul 1. PMID: 38954910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shirazi TN, Hastings WJ, Rosinger AY, Ryan CP. Parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):20522. 10.1038/s41598-020-77082-2. PMID: 33239686; PMCID: PMC7689483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu X, Wang X, Tian X, Kong Y. Association between biological aging and cardiovascular health: combined evidence based on cross-sectional and prospective study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2025;132:105785. 10.1016/j.archger.2025.105785. Epub 2025 Feb 15. PMID: 39983447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hu Y, Kong Y, Tian X, Zhang X, Zuo Y. Association between heavy metals and triglyceride-glucose-related index: a mediation analysis of inflammation indicators. Lipids Health Dis. 2025;24(1):46. 10.1186/s12944-025-02441-9. PMID: 39948676; PMCID: PMC11823045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zou Q, Tian X, Mao Q, Zhu X, Kong Y. Lipid accumulation product mediating the association between uranium and cerebrovascular diseases mortality: evidence from National health and nutrition examination survey. Med (Baltim). 2024;103(51):e40888. 10.1097/MD.0000000000040888. PMID: 39705492; PMCID: PMC11666159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mao Q, Zhu X, Zhang X, Kong Y. Triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators mediating the association between 2-hydroxyfluorene and the prevalence of cardiovascular disease: evidence from the NHANES (2005–2018). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024;287:117283. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117283. Epub 2024 Nov 5. PMID: 39504874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mao Q, Zhu X, Kong Y. Sleep duration mediates the association between heavy metals and the prevalence of depression: an integrated approach from the NHANES (2005–2020). Front Psychiatry. 2024;15:1455896. 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1455896. PMID: 39286395; PMCID: PMC11404323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cheng Z, Kong Y, Yang W, Xu H, Tang D, Zuo Y. Association between serum copper and blood glucose: a mediation analysis of inflammation indicators in the NHANES (2011–2016). Front Public Health. 2024;12:1401347. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401347. PMID: 38855446; PMCID: PMC11157037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mao Q, Tian X, Wang X, Xu H, Zhang Y, Kong Y. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases attributable to diet low in seafood omega-3 fatty acids from 1990 ~ 2021 and forecasting the future trends: A population-based study. PLoS One. 2025;20(2):e0316767. 10.1371/journal.pone.0316767. PMID: 39908338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Mao Q, Kong Y. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases attributable to diet low in vegetables from 1990 to 2021 and forecasting the future trends: a population-based study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025;11:1491869. 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1491869. PMID: 39882319; PMCID: PMC11774848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Qingsong M, Xiao R, Yang W, Wang X, Kong YZ. Global burden of pneumoconiosis attributable to occupational particulate matter, gasses, and fumes from 1990 ~ 2021 and forecasting the future trends: a population-based study. Front Public Health. 2025;12:1494942. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1494942. PMID: 39845664; PMCID: PMC11751240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mao Q, Kong Y. Effect of diet low in omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the global burden of cardiovascular diseases and future trends: evidence from the global burden of disease 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025;11:1485695. 10.3389/fmed.2024.1485695. PMID: 39839646; PMCID: PMC11745892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mao Q, Zhu X, Zhang X, Kong Y. Effect of air pollution on the global burden of cardiovascular diseases and forecasting future trends of the related metrics: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1472996. 10.3389/fmed.2024.1472996. PMID: 39464269; PMCID: PMC11502364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kong Y, Zhu X, Yang Y, Xu H, Ma L, Zuo Y. Knowledge, attitudes, practice, and public health education demand regarding PARI prevention: a cross-sectional study among Chinese undergraduates. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1387789. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1387789. PMID: 38975360; PMCID: PMC11226332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kong Y, Xu H, Li C, Yang Y, Zhu X, Zuo Y. Construction of PARI public health education programs for Chinese undergraduates: a Delphi study. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1390011. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390011. PMID: 38952723; PMCID: PMC11215213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang Y, Zhang C, He P, Tian X, Kong Y, Zhou Y. Association between aging phenotypes and chronic kidney disease: evidence from the NHANES and Mendelian randomization. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Apr 10. 10.1007/s11255-025-04481-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40205127. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32.Rotman Y, Sanyal AJ. Current and upcoming pharmacotherapy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2017;66(1):180–90. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312431. Epub 2016 Sep 19. PMID: 27646933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Devisscher L, Verhelst X, Colle I, Van Vlierberghe H, Geerts A. The role of macrophages in obesity-driven chronic liver disease. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;99(5):693–8. 10.1189/jlb.5RU0116-016R. Epub 2016 Mar 2. PMID: 26936934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huby T, Gautier EL. Immune cell-mediated features of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22(7):429–43. 10.1038/s41577-021-00639-3. Epub 2021 Nov 5. PMID: 34741169; PMCID: PMC8570243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ferrucci L, Levine ME, Kuo PL, Simonsick EM. Time and the metrics of aging. Circ Res. 2018;123(7):740–4. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312816. PMID: 30355074; PMCID: PMC6205734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Alqahtani SA, Schattenberg JM. NAFLD in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:1633–49. 10.2147/CIA.S295524. PMID: 34548787; PMCID: PMC8448161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sheedfar F, Di Biase S, Koonen D, Vinciguerra M. Liver diseases and aging: friends or foes? Aging Cell. 2013;12(6):950–4. 10.1111/acel.12128. Epub 2013 Jul 30. PMID: 23815295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meier HCS, Mitchell C, Karadimas T, Faul JD. Systemic inflammation and biological aging in the health and retirement study. Geroscience. 2023;45(6):3257–65. 10.1007/s11357-023-00880-9. Epub 2023 Jul 27. PMID: 37501048; PMCID: PMC10643484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ogrodnik M, Miwa S, Tchkonia T, Tiniakos D, Wilson CL, Lahat A, Day CP, Burt A, Palmer A, Anstee QM, Grellscheid SN, Hoeijmakers JHJ, Barnhoorn S, Mann DA, Bird TG, Vermeij WP, Kirkland JL, Passos JF, von Zglinicki T, Jurk D. Cellular senescence drives age-dependent hepatic steatosis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15691. 10.1038/ncomms15691. PMID: 28608850; PMCID: PMC5474745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.He Y, Su Y, Duan C, Wang S, He W, Zhang Y, An X, He M. Emerging role of aging in the progression of NAFLD to HCC. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;84:101833. 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101833. Epub 2022 Dec 22. PMID: 36565959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Du X, Wei X, Ma L, Liu X, Guo H, Liu Y, et al. Higher levels of neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio predict increased mortality risk in patients with liver cirrhosis: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;35:198–203. 10.1097/meg.0000000000002470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu CF, Chien LW. Predictive role of neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced liver fibrosis in nondiabetic US adults: evidence from NHANES 2017–2018. Nutrients. 2023;15:81892. 10.3390/nu15081892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mao Q, Zhu X, Zhang X, Kong Y. Diabetes burden attributable to air pollution from 1990 ~ 2021 and the future trends: a population-based study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025;16:1475822. 10.3389/fendo.2025.1475822. PMID: 40265163; PMCID: PMC12011618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (465.2KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES