Table 2.
The results of logistic analysis between TyG and frailty.
| Variables | Model1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95% CI) | P-value | OR(95% CI) | P-value | OR(95% CI) | P-value | |
| TyG (continuous) | 1.32 (1.17 ~ 1.50) | < 0.001 | 1.36 (1.20 ~ 1.55) | < 0.001 | 1.26 (1.10 ~ 1.45) | 0.001 |
| Group | ||||||
| Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Q2 | 1.04 (0.81 ~ 1.34,) | 0.763 | 1.02 (0.79 ~ 1.31) | 0.897 | 0.98 (0.76 ~ 1.27) | 0.882 |
| Q3 | 1.35 (1.06 ~ 1.72) | 0.014 | 1.36 (1.06 ~ 1.74) | 0.016 | 1.22 (0.95 ~ 1.58) | 0.121 |
| Q4 | 1.57 (1.24 ~ 1.99) | < 0.001 | 1.65 (1.29 ~ 2.10) | < 0.001 | 1.43 (1.10 ~ 1.85) | 0.007 |
The TyG index, was categorized into four quartiles: Q1 (<8.29 mg/dL), Q2 (8.29–8.68 mg/dL), Q3 (8.68–9.14 mg/dL), and Q4 (≥9.14 mg/dL). Ref: reference. Model 1 was unadjusted, while Model 2 included adjustments for gender, age, residence, and education level. Model 3 expanded these adjustments to incorporate smoking, alcohol consumption, hemoglobin levels, waist circumference, and BMI.