ABSTRACT
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) exhibits broad-spectrum antiviral activity and is commonly used as an over-the-counter disinfecting agent. However, its potential activities against SARS-CoV-2 have not been systematically evaluated, and mechanisms of action are not well understood. In this study, we investigate H2O2’s antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 infection and its impact on the virion’s structural integrity as compared to the commonly used fixative agent paraformaldehyde (PFA). We show that H2O2 rapidly and directly inactivates SARS-CoV-2 with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.0015%. Cryogenic electron tomography (cryo-ET) with subtomogram averaging reveals that treatment with PFA induced the viral trimeric spike protein (S) to adopt a post-fusion conformation, and treatment of viral particles with H2O2 locked S in its pre-fusion conformation. Therefore, H2O2 treatment likely has induced modifications, such as oxidation of cysteine residues within the S subunits of the spike trimer that locked them in their pre-fusion conformation. Locking of the meta-stable pre-fusion trimer prevents its transition to the post-fusion conformation, a process essential for viral fusion with host cells and entry into host cells. Together, our cellular, biochemical, and structural studies established that hydrogen peroxide can inactivate SARS-CoV-2 in tissue culture and uncovered its underlying molecular mechanism.
IMPORTANCE
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is the commonly used, over-the-counter antiseptic solution available in pharmacies, but its effect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been evaluated systematically. In this study, we show that H2O2 inactivates the SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and establish the effective concentration of this activity. Cryogenic electron tomography and sub-tomogram averaging reveal a detailed structural understanding of how H2O2 affects the SARS-CoV-2 spike in comparison with that of the commonly used fixative PFA under identical conditions. We found that PFA promoted a post-fusion conformation of the viral spike protein, while H2O2 could potentially lock the spike in its pre-fusion state. Our findings not only substantiate the disinfectant efficacy of H2O2 as a potent agent against SARS-CoV-2 but also lay the groundwork for future investigations into targeted antiviral therapies that may leverage the virus’ structural susceptibilities. In addition, this study may have significant implications for developing new antiviral strategies and improving existing disinfection protocols.
KEYWORDS: hydrogen peroxide, SARS-CoV-2, spike proteins, cryo-ET
INTRODUCTION
The first two decades of the new millennium have witnessed unprecedented global challenges posed by viral infections, with a series of novel and re-emerging pathogens, including severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), Zika virus (ZIKV), and SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. Most notably, emerging in less than 20 years after SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus believed to have originated in bats and subsequently transmitted to humans, likely through an intermediate animal host. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 introduction has been profound, with millions of lives lost (more than 7 million as of September 2024) (1). One thing certain to occur both from public health history and epidemiology research is a new SARS-CoV-like pandemic in the future. As such, efforts to find a cheap, readily available, and wide-spectrum antiviral treatment regimen in preparation for such future pandemics are a public health priority.
SARS-CoV-2 is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the Coronaviridae family. Its genome is approximately 30 kilobases in length and contains several ORFs that encode various viral structural and non-structural proteins. Four main structural proteins are Spike (S), Envelope (E), Membrane (M), and Nucleocapsid (N). These proteins play essential roles in viral entry, assembly, and immune evasion (1–5). Among them, the 600 kDa trimeric Spike (S) protein plays a pivotal role in establishing infection by SARS-CoV-2. The S protein exists as a trimeric glycoprotein protruding from the viral envelope. The trimeric nature of the S protein enhances its stability and avidity for receptor binding, contributing to the efficient infection of target cells. The S1 subunit of the S protein contains the receptor-binding domain (RBD), a crucial region essential for recognizing and binding to specific cell host receptors, primarily the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Cysteine residues are indispensable for the proper function of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, stabilizing its pre-fusion structure and enabling the structural transitions required for viral entry. RBD contains a total of nine cysteine residues, eight of which form four pairs of disulfide bonds. Three pairs (Cys336–Cys361, Cys379–Cys432, and Cys391–Cys525) in the core help with stabilizing the β sheet structure, and the Cys480–Cys488 pair connects the loops in the distal end of the RBM (6). The RBD is typically in a “closed” or “down” conformation, masking the binding site from host cell receptors. This metastable conformation prepares the virus for receptor engagement. Upon binding to the ACE2 receptor, the S1 subunit undergoes significant structural rearrangements and conformational changes. The receptor-binding sites (RBS) of the S1 are exposed only when the RBDs adopt an “up” conformation. In this conformation, the RBDs are in an open or exposed state, allowing them to bind to the host cell receptor. Following binding to the receptor, S2 undergoes further structural rearrangements. These include shedding of the S1 subunit and exposing the fusion peptide (FP). The FP then inserts into the target cell membrane, facilitating virus-host cell membrane fusion. Following fusion, the S protein adopts a needle-shaped post-fusion conformation characterized by three helices entwining coaxially. This structural transformation allows for the release of the viral genome into the host cell, initiating viral replication (6–9).
As we continue to navigate through the SARS-CoV-2-caused health crises, the search for effective strategies to combat viral spread has become paramount. One such strategy that has garnered attention is the use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as a potential treatment against a wide array of viruses including SARS-CoV-2 (10–12). In the context of viral infections, H2O2 is considered a potent virucidal agent. The mechanism responsible for the virucidal action of H2O2 involves the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon decomposition, which exerts oxidative stress on viral proteins, nucleic acids, and lipid membranes. This oxidative damage disrupts the structural integrity of the virus, rendering it incapable of infecting host cells (13, 14).
Three-dimensional (3D) structures from cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and tomography (cryo-ET) have provided insights into the topography and structural changes in SARS-CoV-2 spikes and revealed the structural rearrangements of S protein during the viral entry process. It is well established that the methods used for viral sample preparation, as well as virus inactivation and fixation, can influence the distribution of conformational states of the spike protein, including the ratio between pre-fusion and post-fusion forms (15). For example, treatment with PFA generally fixes viral particles predominantly in the pre-fusion state (16–18). However, SARS-CoV-2 infection of cells overexpressing ACE2 has been shown to promote a shift toward the post-fusion state of the S protein upon fixation by PFA. When SARS-CoV-2 particles are inactivated with PFA in A549 cells overexpressing ACE2, the S protein exclusively adopts the post-fusion conformation (19). In addition, in Vero cells treated with PFA, both pre-fusion and post-fusion states of the spike protein have been observed (20). On the other hand, treatment with β-propiolactone (PBL) tends to lock the majority of S proteins in the post-fusion state (21). Interestingly, another study found that PBL inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 resulted in nearly equal distribution (42% pre-fusion, 48% post-fusion) of spike protein conformations (22). In this study, we set out to investigate the antiviral effects of H2O2 on SARS-CoV-2 and determine how H2O2 affects the structural rearrangements of the S protein. We compared H2O2 effects with those of PFA using cryo-EM and cryo-ET under identical conditions. Our results demonstrated that, when viral particles were treated with PFA, the S protein on the virion envelope existed in the post-fusion state. By contrast, when viral particles were fixed with H2O2, the S protein was found to be locked in the pre-fusion state. This observation suggested that the fixation method could potentially impact the conformational dynamics of the S protein. H2O2 likely induced modifications, particularly oxidation of cysteine residues within the RBD of the S protein. This oxidative modification may have resulted in the stabilization of the pre-fusion conformation, preventing the transition of the S protein to the post-fusion state essential for viral fusion and entry into host cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All the SARS-CoV-2-based experiments were performed at the UCLA BSL3 facility.
Viruses
The recombinant SARS-CoV-2 (icSARS-CoV-2-mNG) expressing mNeonGreen (23) was a kind gift from the World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses (WRCEVA), Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch through an MTA. SARS-CoV-2 variant of concerns SARS-CoV-2-α (SARS-CoV-2, Isolate hCoV-19/USA/OR-OHSU-PHL00037/2021-B.1.1.7), SARS-CoV-2-β (SARS-CoV-2, Isolate hCoV-19/USA/MD-HP01542/2021B.1.351), SARS-CoV-2-γ (SARS-CoV-2, Isolate hCoV-19/Japan/TY7-503/2021 P.1 or 20J/501Y.V3), and SARS-CoV-2-δ (SARS-CoV-2, Isolate hCoV-19/USA/PHC658/2021-B.1.617.2) were provided by Dr. Vaithilingarajai Arumugaswami, who obtained them from the BEI resources.
SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA copy number assay
Supernatant (200 µL) was harvested from cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 and mixed with an equal volume of lysis buffer provided in the high pure viral RNA kit (Invitrogen) and RNA was extracted according to the kit’s instructions. The eluted RNA was subjected to RT-qPCR using the One Step TB Green PrimeScript RT-qPCR Kit II (Takara) and specific primers targeting the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP): Forward, 5′-TAATCAGACAAGGAACTGATTA-3′, and Reverse, 5′-CGAAGGTGTGACTTCCATG-3′.
RT-qPCR cycling conditions were 42°C for 5 min, 95°C for 10 s, and 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, followed by 60°C for 30 s.
RT-qPCR
Cells were collected in Trizol, and RNA was isolated by standard isopropanol precipitation. RNA was quantified, and 1 µg of RNA was reverse transcribed using iScript (BioRad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with random hexamer as primers. RT-qPCR analysis was done using the iCycler thermocycler using gene-specific primers (Bio-Rad). RT-qPCR was conducted in a final volume of 20 µL. Amplification conditions were as follows: 95°C (3 min), 40 cycles of 95°C (20 s), 55°C (30 s), and 72°C (20 s). Expression values were normalized to L32 (RPL32), and fold induction was normalized to untreated control. For detection of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA, the below primers targeting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) were used: NP-Forward, 5′-TAATCAGACAAGGAACTGATTA-3′, and NP-Reverse, 5′-CGAAGGTGTGACTTCCATG-3′.
Identification of CC50 and IC50 values
Twenty hours prior to the cytotoxicity assay, 8 × 103 HeLa-ACE-2 cells were seeded in 96-Well White/Clear Bottom Plate, TC Surface (Thermo Fisher). Cells were treated with twofold serial dilutions of H2O2 for 1 hour with or without catalase for 5 minutes, and cells were washed with 1× PBS, followed by the addition of fresh media. The cell viability was determined using the Cell Titer-Glo luminescent cell viability assay (Promega). IC50 and CC50 values were calculated by non-linear regression analysis using GraphPad 5.
SARS-CoV-2 production, purification methods for structural studies
To expand and purify SARS-CoV-2 particles, we adapted protocols from Yao et al. (18) and Ke et al. (17) with some modifications. In brief, Vero-E6 cells were cultured to 80% confluency and then infected with SARS-CoV-2 at a MOI of 0.01 and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ incubator. At 60 hours post-infection (HPI), the medium from the infected cells was collected and subjected to three freeze-thaw cycles, followed by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 minutes at 4°C to pellet and remove cell debris. The resultant sample was taken for plaque assay to quantify the viral titer. Half of the pre-cleared media containing the virus was inactivated using 4% PFA, while the other half was treated with 3% H2O2. Fixation was conducted at room temperature for 3 hours, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C.
Non-infectivity of these treated virion samples was verified by the following steps: an aliquot of the fixed particles was used to infect fresh cells. At 24 HPI, the supernatant from these infected cells was collected for plaque assay, and RNA was extracted from the cell lysate for subsequent RT-qPCR analysis.
For cryo-EM studies, the above virion samples were layered onto a 20% sucrose cushion in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.3) with 150 mM NaCl (HN buffer) and subjected to ultracentrifugation using a Beckman SW41Ti rotor at 100,000 × g for 2 hours at 4°C. Subsequently, the pellet was rinsed with HN buffer to eliminate any residual sucrose and then resuspended in 100 µL of HN buffer for further analysis and cryo-EM/cryo-ET sample preparation.
Electron microscopy and cryogenic electron tomography
For negative staining TEM, an aliquot of 3 µL sample was applied to each carbon-coated copper grid (Electron Microscopy China, Beijing, China; http://www.emcn.com.cn). The samples were stained using 2% uranium acetate and imaged with a Tecnai 20 electron microscope operated at 200 kV (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
For cryo-EM and cryo-ET, a 3 µL aliquot of the virus sample was applied to a glow-discharged copper grid coated with holey carbon (R 2/1; Quantifoil, Germany). The samples were vitrified by plunge-freezing in a mixture of liquid ethane and propane at a 3:7 ratio using a homemade manual plunger. The frozen hydrated virions on the cryo-EM grids were imaged on a Titan Krios microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated at 300 kV. The microscope was equipped with an energy filter (slit width 20 eV; GIF Quantum LS, Gatan, CA) and a K3 direct electron detector (Gatan, CA). Tilt series of virions were recorded in super-resolution mode at a nominal magnification of 33,000× (corresponding to a calibrated pixel size of 2.605 Å at the specimen level). The tilt series were collected using a dose-symmetric scheme from –60° to 60° in 3° increments, with various defocus values ranging from –1.5 to –5.5 µm, using the acquisition software package serialEM (24). At each tilt angle, a movie consisting of six frames was recorded with an exposure time of 0.05 s per frame, resulting in a cumulative dose of 127.1 electrons/Å2 for the entire tilt series.
Data processing
Frames in each movie were motion corrected using MotionCor2 (25) without dose weighting. The defocus value of the aligned images at each tilt angle was estimated using CTFFIND4 (26). Subsequent tilt-series alignment and reconstruction steps were performed in the framework of the IMOD version 4.11 software package (27) following steps: micrographs within each tilt series were aligned using patch tracking, and tomograms reconstructed via weighted back projection with a SIRT-like filter and 4× binning (10.42 Å per pixel).
For subtomogram averaging, the pre-fusion (triangular shape) and post-fusion (needle-like shape) conformations of the spike protein were identified based on their distinct differences in shape and width protruding from the virion envelope in the tomograms. We manually picked more than 200 pre-fusion and more than 50 post-fusion spike proteins using the two-point particle picking method in IMOD. Their coordinates were generated in tomoNet (28) and subsequently imported into RELION 4.0 (29) for subtomogram averaging. The particles were extracted as pseudo-subtomograms with a box size of 32 × 32 (4× binning, 10.42 Å per pixel). Subsequently, C3 symmetry was applied during 3D refinement. The resolutions for the final subtomogram averages were 37 Å and 38 Å for the pre- and post-fusion conformations, respectively. UCSF ChimeraX was used to visualize the averaged subtomogram maps. Atomic models (PDB accession codes 6XR8 and 6XRA [30]) of the pre- and post-fusion spike protein were fitted as rigid bodies to the corresponding densities using the Fit in Map tool (31).
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed with an unpaired Student t-test by Prism software (GraphPad). All of the data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from three independent experiments; ∗P ≤ 0.05, ∗∗P ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗P ≤ 0.001.
RESULTS
Hydrogen peroxide efficiently inactivates SARS-CoV-2
To determine the efficacy of H2O2 in inactivation of SARS-CoV-2, viral particles of SARS-CoV-2 carrying the GFP gene (23) were exposed to either 3% (651 µM) ethanol or 0.03% (8.8 µM) H2O2. The treated particles were then used to infect the HeLa-ACE-2 cells for 24 hours. Quantification of viral RNA isolated from the infected cells by RT-qPCR indicated that 651 µM ethanol could not inhibit viral infection (Fig. 1A). By contrast, treatment of viral particles with 8.8 µM H2O2 significantly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication as shown in Fig. 1B. Furthermore, the fluorescent microscopy images also indicated that unlike H2O2 , treatment of SARS-CoV-2 virions with 651 µM ethanol, did not have any antiviral effect against SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 1C through E). Next, we treated SARS-CoV-2 particles with serially diluted H2O2. These H2O2-treated viral particles were subsequently utilized as the virus inoculum to infect HeLa-ACE-2 cells for 1 hour. The infected cells were harvested at 24 HPI, and RNA samples were isolated from the cell lyase and subjected to RT-qPCR. The results indicated that a concentration as low as 0.003% of H2O2 could significantly suppress SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 1F; Fig. S1A). The RT-qPCR-based titration of viral particles identified the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of H2O2 in inhibiting the infection of SARS-CoV-2 in HeLa-ACE-2 cells to be as low as 0.0015% (Fig. 1G; Fig. S1B) which is far from its 50% cytotoxicity concentration (CC50) (Fig. S1C). These data indicate that H2O2 is a very potent antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2, and its IC50 of 0.0015% is much lower than the 3% concentration commonly used for dental hygiene.
Fig 1.

The efficacy of H2O2 in inhibition of infection with SARS-CoV-2. (A and B) Comparison of the ethanol and H2O2 potency in inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection. RT-qPCR analysis of RNA extracted from HeLa-ACE-2 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron treated with (A) 3% ethanol or (B) 0.03% H2O2 to titrate the viral RNA. (C and E) Fluorescent microscopy images from HeLa-ACE-2 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 expressing GFP which were (C) left untreated used as control, (D) treated with 0.03% H2O2, or (E) treated with 3% ethanol for 24 hours. (F) Quantification of RNA extracted from HeLa-ACE-2 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 treated with serially diluted H2O2. Cells were harvested at 24 HPI, the viral RNA was extracted from virions released to the supernatant, and the viral RNA was titrated by RT-qPCR (G). Data from panel F were used to determine the IC50 of H2O2 in inhibiting the infection with SARS-CoV-2 in HeLa-ACE-2. All data are means ± SEM; ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Next, we investigated whether the observed outcome of H2O2 inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 was solely due to the direct action of H2O2 on the virus or if it was also due to its effects on the host cells’ viability. To achieve this, SARS-CoV-2 virus particles, whether treated or untreated with H2O2, were passed through an ultra-centrifugal filter unit to clean out the viral particles from H2O2 before infecting cells. The filter was washed three times with the wash buffer, and the eluted viral particles were used to infect the HeLa-ACE-2 cells. At 24 HPI, microscopic images were taken of the infected cells under the indicated treatment. The results demonstrated that similar to unfiltered samples (Fig. 2A and B), H2O2 significantly inhibited the SARS-CoV-2 infection (Fig. 2C and D). To further quantify the effect of H2O2 treatment, we used RT-qPCR analysis to compare the level of viral genomic RNA isolated from cells infected with the H2O2-treated unfiltered SARS CoV-2 and those isolated from cells infected with the unfiltered SARS-COV-2 (Fig. 2E). Similarly, the viral titer of H2O2-treated-filtered SARS CoV-2 samples was compared to the filtered SARS-COV-2 (Fig. 2F). The results indicated that H2O2 treatment strongly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication in both unfiltered and filtered samples. These data suggested that H2O2 suppresses the SARS CoV-2 infection through its direct effect on viral particles.
Fig 2.

Dissecting the effect of H2O2 on the viability of cells and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 particles. (A–D) Fluorescent microscopy images from HeLa-ACE-2 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2-expressing GFP for 24 hours which were (A) left untreated and unfiltered used as control, (B) treated with 0.006% H2O2 and unfiltered, (C) left untreated and filtered used as control, or (D) treated with 0.006% H2O2 and filtered. (E) Titration of viral RNA extracted from infected cells under panel A and B conditions. (F) Titration of viral RNA extracted from infected cells under panel C and D conditions. All data are means ± SEM; ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
To further exclude the cytotoxic effects of H2O2 on host cells and determine the kinetics for H2O2-mediated effects on viral particles, we took advantage of catalase, an enzyme that catalyzes the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen. We first treated SARS-CoV-2 without or with different concentrations of H2O2 for 10 minutes and then inactivated H2O2 by adding catalase before infecting HeLa-ACE-2 cells. This step ensures that the effects observed after the catalase treatment are not due to residual hydrogen peroxide. As shown in Fig. 3A through E, pre-treatments of SARS-CoV-2 with H2O2 still effectively inhibited the SARS-CoV-2 replication in the HeLa-ACE-2 cells even though H2O2 had been inactivated by catalase before infecting cells. This antiviral effect of H2O2 is not due to its potential cytotoxicity as all HeLa-ACE-2 cells were viable after co-treatment with H2O2 and catalase as shown in Fig. S2, catalase mitigated the hydrogen peroxide-induced cellular damage and preserved the cell’s viability. To further corroborate these results, SARS-CoV-2 particles were serially diluted and double-treated with H2O2 followed by catalase treatment. HeLa-ACE-2 were infected with these treated SARS-CoV-2 particles for 24 hours. The viral RNA was isolated from the viral particles released to the supernatant of the infected cells, and the copy number of viral RNA was quantified (Fig.3F). The results revealed that even at a concentration as low as 0.3%, H2O2 serves as a highly effective barrier against SARS-CoV-2.
Fig 3.

Hydrogen peroxide efficiently inactivates SARS-CoV-2. (A–E) Fluorescent microscopy images from HeLa-ACE-2 cells that were (A) left untreated-uninfected and used as a control or (B–E) infected with SARS-CoV-2 and treated with serially diluted H2O2 as indicated followed by catalase treatment. (F) The viral RNA was isolated from the viral particles released to the supernatant of the infected cells, and the copy number of viral RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR. (G) Determination of the minimum duration needed for hydrogen peroxide to effectively block SARS-CoV-2. HeLa-ACE-2 cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 which were treated with 1.5% H2O2 at the indicated time followed by catalase treatment for 5 minutes. The viral RNA was isolated from the infected cells and quantified by RT-qPCR. All data are means ± SEM; ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
To identify the duration necessary for hydrogen peroxide to impede the SARS-CoV-2 replication, we treated SARS-CoV-2 particles with 1.5% H2O2 for the indicated times and then inactivated H2O2 with catalase for 5 minutes before infecting HeLa-ACE2 cells. Viral RNA was extracted from the virions and released to the supernatant of the infected cells at 24 HPI. The results of RT-qPCR indicated that 1.5% H2O2 inactivated more than 50% of the viral particles in 30 seconds (Fig. 3G). These data suggest that H2O2 can directly and rapidly inactivate SARS-CoV-2 viral particles.
Hydrogen peroxide efficacy against infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern
Being an RNA virus, SARS-CoV-2 constantly acquires mutations as it replicates. Mutations that are neutral or have only mild deleterious effects on the host may persist in the population, especially if they do not significantly impact the virus’s fitness. These mutations may accumulate over time, leading to genetic diversity within the virus population. These mutations may confer a fitness advantage to the virus, allowing it to replicate more efficiently, evade the host’s immune system, transmit more easily between individuals, or gain drug resistance. In such cases, these advantageous mutations may increase in frequency within the population over time, potentially leading to the emergence of new variants that are better adapted to their environment (4, 32, 33). To investigate the impact of H2O2 on the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, SARS-CoV-2 variants were exposed to 0.003% H2O2. The viral particles were then used to infect HeLa-ACE2 cells for 1 hour. The infected cells were collected at 24 HPI, and RNA extracted from the cell lysates was subjected to RT-qPCR analysis. The results showed that even at a concentration of 0.003%, H2O2 significantly suppressed the replication of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (Fig. 4A through F). Furthermore, to specifically investigate the impact of H2O2 on the viral particles rather than the cells, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern were treated with H2O2 and then subjected to catalase treatment. The virus inoculum was introduced to HeLa-ACE-2 cells, and the infected cells were harvested at 24 HPI. The results obtained from this study revealed that all variants subjected to this study, including B.1.1.7 (alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma), B.1.617.2 (Delta), and B.1.1.529 (Omicron), were remarkably inhibited by 0.03% of hydrogen peroxide (Fig. S3A through F). These data indicated that H2O2 effectively inhibited all tested SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.
Fig 4.

Hydrogen peroxide efficacy against infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. (A–F) HeLa-ACE-2 infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants exposed to H2O2. Viral RNA extracted from viral particles was released to the supernatant of the infected cells at 24 HPI and subjected to RT-qPCR. (A) Original SARS-CoV-2, (B) P.1 (Gamma), (C) B.1.351 (Beta), (D) B.1.1.7 (alpha), (E) B.1.617.2 (Delta), and (F) B.1.1.529 (Omicron). All data are means ± SEM; ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
PFA and H2O2 have different effects on the in situ structure of the spike protein
To investigate the structural state of the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 particles inactivated by fixation, we infected Vero-E6 cells with SARS-CoV-2 and harvested the samples at 60 HPI. The harvested particles were then inactivated using either 4% PFA or 3% H2O2 and concentrated by ultracentrifugation. Subsequently, the viral particles were subjected to morphological examination using negative staining transmission electron microscopy (TEM) followed by cryo-EM images. Our analysis demonstrated that both negative TEM and cryo-EM images revealed variability in the sizes of viral particles under either 4% PFA or 3% H2O2 treatment (Fig. 5A; Fig. S4).
Fig 5.

Cryo-EM and cryo-ET analyses of SARS-CoV-2 virions subjected to H2O2 or PFA treatments. (A) Representative cryo-EM images from SARS-CoV-2 particles treated with 3% H2O2 (left) or 4% PFA (right). (B) Representative density slices (thickness 5.21 nm) from cryo-ET tomograms of SARS-CoV-2 treated with 3% H2O2 (left) or 4% PFA (right). (C–F) Regions of cryo-ET reconstruction showing spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 particles treated with (C and D) 3% H2O2 or (E and F) 4% PFA. Subtomogram averaging (D and F) of spike proteins on the virions indicated the “RBD down” pre-fusion conformation (resolution, 37 Å) under (D) the 3% H2O2 treatment condition and (F) the “needle-like” post-fusion conformation (resolution, 38 Å) under the 4% PFA treatment. The subtomogram average maps are shown as semi-transparent surfaces in superposition with the purple ribbon diagrams of the (D) pre-fusion (PDB: 6XRA [30]) and (F) the post-fusion (PDB: 6XR8 [30]) atomic structures. (G) Statistics of different conformations of the spike protein induced by 3% H2O2 (more than 200 particles) or 4% PFA (more than 50 particles) treatments.
To visualize the 3D architecture of the virions and conformation of the spikes, we performed 3D reconstructions using cryo-ET (Fig. 5B). Our observations revealed that while virions exhibited various shapes, their overall shape and size were remarkably consistent under both 4% PFA and 3% H2O2 treatments as shown in the tomographic data (Fig. 5B). Notably, the viral membrane remained intact, exhibiting clear bilayer characteristics after fixation, which indicated that our treatments did not compromise the integrity of the viral membrane. Furthermore, the thickness of the bilayer was nearly identical between virions treated with 4% PFA and those treated with 3% H2O2 (Fig. 5C and E). Notably, the ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) were distinctly identifiable, and their distribution and characteristics were nearly identical between virions treated with 4% PFA and those treated with 3% H2O2 (Fig. 5C and E). This suggested that our treatments did not affect the RNPs based on our tomographic data. We also compared the spike protein under these two treatment conditions. Interestingly, in virions treated with 4% PFA, the spike protein exhibited a needle-like shape, measuring 21.6 nm in length and 6.3 nm in width, as seen in the tomogram slice (Fig. 5E). By contrast, those treated with 3% H2O2 displayed a triangular shape, measuring 18.2 nm in length and 11.5 nm in width (Fig. 5C). We hypothesized that these two distinct shapes of the spike proteins represented different conformations, suggesting that the fixation method may influence the spike protein conformation.
To quantify this observation, we analyzed the distribution of structural states of the spike protein on virions. Analysis of H2O2-inactivated virion particles revealed that the spike proteins predominantly adopted a pre-fusion conformation, characterized by the RBD in a down conformation, resembling a “trimer of hairpins.” By contrast, trimers on the viral particles inactivated with PFA displayed a post-fusion conformation (Fig. 5G) and Table S1.
To further determine the conformation of the spike proteins on the virion, we performed subtomogram averaging (STA). We manually selected 206 triangular-shaped and 54 needle-like particles from the data sets and processed them using RELION 4.0, resulting in the structures of the different shapes of the spike proteins with resolutions of 37 Å and 38 Å, respectively (Fig. 5D and F). While the low resolution limited the detailed structural insights, we observed significant differences in structural features between viral particles inactivated with 3% H2O2 and those inactivated with 4% PFA. We fitted pre- and post-fusion models into the maps (Fig. 5D and F). Fitting of S trimer atomic models into the cryo-ET density map confirmed that the triangular shape on the H2O2-treated viral particles corresponds to the pre-fusion spike protein (with the receptor-binding domain, the RBD, in a down conformation), while the needle-like shape on the PFA-treated viral particles represents the post-fusion spike protein. Specifically, S is in the “RBD down,” pre-fusion conformation under 3% H2O2 treatment, while on 4% PFA-treated SARS-CoV-2 particles, it closely resembled that of the post-fusion conformation of recombinant spike protein structures (30, 34).
DISCUSSION
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) exhibits broad-spectrum antiviral activity, making it effective against a variety of viral pathogens, including enveloped and non-enveloped viruses (35) such as coronaviruses, influenza viruses, noroviruses, and other respiratory viruses (36, 37). Its rapid action and broad efficacy make it a valuable tool in preventing the transmission of viral infections in healthcare settings, public spaces, and households (38–41). The antiviral activity of hydrogen peroxide is attributed to its ability to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen, upon decomposition. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for such broad antiviral effects of H2O2 are not understood. In the current study, we investigated the antiviral effects of H2O2 on SARS-CoV-2, established the effective dose and treatment time required for virus inactivation, and analyzed the impact of H2O2 treatment on distributions of S trimers in situ on the virion surface compared to PFA treatment under identical conditions, both in 2D with cryo-EM and in 3D with cryo-ET.
The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) plays a crucial role in both cell entry and immune evasion. It is a major determinant of viral infectivity and pathogenesis (42). Notably, S undergoes extensive structural rearrangements during the entry process, transitioning from a pre-fusion to a post-fusion conformation. These conformational changes are crucial for the virus to establish infection. In its pre-fusion state, S exists as a trimeric glycoprotein protruding from the viral envelope. S in this state is primed for receptor engagement and subsequent fusion with the host cell membrane. In the post-fusion state, S adopts a more stable conformation characterized by a needle-like structure, with the fusion peptide inserted into the host cell membrane. The transition from the pre- to post-fusion conformation enables the fusion of viral and endosomal membranes, allowing the viral genomic RNA into the cytosol. Our cryo-EM, cryo-ET, and subtomogram average analyses showed that S on SARS-CoV-2 was in the post-fusion conformation when inactivated by PFA, but remained in the pre-fusion conformation with H2O2 treatment (Fig. 5). The results of this study indicate that H₂O₂ treatment of SARS-CoV-2 locks the spike (S) protein in the pre-fusion conformation, whereas PFA treatment predominantly stabilizes the S protein in the post-fusion state. These findings contrast with those of Yao et al. (18), Turoňová et al. (16), and Ke et al. (17), who reported that PFA treatment predominantly triggers the pre-fusion state of the S protein. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection of ACE2-overexpressing A549 cells followed by PFA fixation has been shown to promote a shift toward the post-fusion conformation (19). In addition, in Vero cells treated with PFA, both pre-fusion and post-fusion forms of the S protein have been observed (20).
It is well established that the methods used for viral sample preparation, inactivation, and fixation can influence the distribution of conformational states of the S protein, including the relative proportions of pre-fusion and post-fusion forms (15). The duration and conditions of PFA treatment, as determined by UCLA BSL3 regulations, were rigorous, involving 3 hours at room temperature, followed by 24 hours at 4°C, to ensure complete viral inactivation. By contrast, Yao et al. employed 48 hours at 4°C (18), while Ke et al. used 30 minutes at room temperature (15, 17). Furthermore, a very low MOI of 0.01 was used in our study to mimic more physiologically relevant conditions, where viral spread is typically slower and controlled. In addition, this strategy helps reduce the potential for defective viral particles (20).
Another consideration could be the viral strain used in each study. Different laboratories may work with distinct SARS-CoV-2 isolates, which could impact the results. For example, Song et al. showed that the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 has a significantly higher number of spike proteins on the virion compared to the wild-type (WT) strain. While both the delta variant and WT strain exhibit a higher ratio of pre-fusion to post-fusion spike proteins after PFA fixation, the Delta variant has a notably higher number of post-fusion spikes. In addition, E-beam inactivation significantly alters the ratio of post-fusion to pre-fusion spike proteins in both the Delta and WT strains (43). In the current study, a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 (icSARS-CoV-2-mNG) expressing mNeonGreen (23) was used.
H2O2 is known for its oxidative properties and likely has induced modifications, such as oxidation of cysteine residues within the RBD of S. Such oxidative modification may have locked the S trimer in its pre-fusion conformation, preventing the transition of S to the post-fusion state, an essential step for viral fusion and entry into host cells. The cysteine pairs (Cys336–Cys361, Cys379–Cys432, and Cys391–Cys525) in the core, and Cys480–Cys488 (Fig. S5) located at the distal end of the RBD, are known to play a pivotal role in stabilizing the spike structure (6). These cysteine residues may be modified by H2O2-mediated oxidation of S. Oxidation of the Cys480–Cys488 pair could potentially disrupt the conformation of the RBD, hindering ACE2 binding and favoring the pre-fusion state by preventing the conformational changes necessary for membrane fusion. In addition, Cys538–Cys590 near the S1/S2 cleavage site, Cys-617-Cys 649 in the S2 subunit, and Cys131–Cys166 in the N-terminal domain may also impact the S transition between pre-fusion and post-fusion states. The primary focus of the present study is to investigate the native spike protein in its bound state to the virion. We will continue to explore the role of H2O2 treatment on cysteine residues in RBD using the purified trimeric S protein in future studies.
Research on infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions must be performed in a BSL-3 facility. However, our BSL-3 facility is not equipped with a cryo-EM microscope. As a result, viral particles must be fully inactivated using an appropriate fixative before they can be safely transferred out of the BSL-3 lab for further analysis. Consequently, we are unable to compare the number of spike proteins on infectious virions to that on inactivated particles either with PFA or H₂O₂ treatment. The results in Table S1 show variability in spike counts in both PFA and H₂O₂-treated particles.
While H2O2 is primarily known as an oxidizing agent, its specific effects on protein structure and conformation may vary depending on other factors, including the local environment and the presence of other molecules or ions. Though not possible to evaluate due to the pleomorphic nature of their structures, interactions between H2O2 and other components of the SARS-CoV-2 particles or the surrounding environment may have also contributed to the observed anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect and the stabilization of the pre-fusion state of S. Such interactions include chemical reactions, structural modifications to lipids and viral genome, or/and changes in molecular interactions.
In conclusion, our study established the virucidal effects of H2O2 on SARS-CoV-2 and offers valuable insights into the structural basis of this effect. The broad-spectrum antiviral activity, rapid action, safety profile, and compatibility with various surfaces make hydrogen peroxide an asset in disinfection and sterilization efforts (44–46). While the virucidal activity of H2O2 against other coronaviruses has been investigated by others, the results presented here represent the first time when the impact of H2O2 on structural changes of SARS-CoV-2 spikes and the difference from that of PFA inactivation are systematically assessed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project is supported by the Research Funds from US National Institutes of Health grants GM071940 and DE025567 (to Z.H.Z.) and R01AI158154 (to G.C.), 441802-GC-29153,41802-GC-30706, and Charles Huang Foundation Research Fund.
We thank Enikam for providing H2O2 and acknowledge the use of resources at the Electron Imaging Center for NanoSystems supported by UCLA and grants from the NIH (1S10OD018111) and the National Science Foundation (DBI-1338135 and DMR-1548924). We thank Ms. Barbara Dillon, the director of the UCLA BSL3 facility for providing a safe and organized laboratory to perform the SARS-CoV-2-based research projects.
G.C. and Z.H.Z. initialized and supervised the research. S.R.A., G.X., Z.H.Z., and G.C. designed the research. S.R.A. conducted the project in the BSL3 facility. G.X. prepared the cryo-ET samples and recorded the cryo-ET tilt series with X.X., and L.W. was involved in the experimental analysis, G.D.X. processed the cryo-ET data and performed subtomogram averaging. S.R.A., Z.H.Z., G.X., and G.C. interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Footnotes
This article is a direct contribution from Genhong Cheng, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Tongqing Zhou, Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Zhiyong Lou, Tsinghua University.
Contributor Information
Z. Hong Zhou, Email: Hong.Zhou@UCLA.edu.
Genhong Cheng, Email: Gcheng@mednet.ucla.edu.
Suresh Mahalingam, Griffith University-Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03994-24.
Fluorescent microscopy and IC50 and CC50 of H2O2.
IC50 of H2O2.
Hydrogen peroxide efficacy against infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.
Negative staining TEM images of virions treated with 3% H2O2 and 4% PFA.
Key disulfide bonds that may facilitate the transition of the spike protein from its pre-fusion to post-fusion conformation.
Supplemental figure and table legends.
Spike count.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Cui J, Li F, Shi Z-L. 2019. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:181–192. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Schoggins JW, Wilson SJ, Panis M, Murphy MY, Jones CT, Bieniasz P, Rice CM. 2011. A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature 472:481–485. doi: 10.1038/nature09907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Carabelli AM, Peacock TP, Thorne LG, Harvey WT, Hughes J, COVID-19 Genomics UK Consortium, Peacock SJ, Barclay WS, de Silva TI, Towers GJ, Robertson DL. 2023. SARS-CoV-2 variant biology: immune escape, transmission and fitness. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:162–177. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00841-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Markov PV, Ghafari M, Beer M, Lythgoe K, Simmonds P, Stilianakis NI, Katzourakis A. 2023. The evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:361–379. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00878-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Aliyari SR, Ghaffari AA, Pernet O, Parvatiyar K, Wang Y, Gerami H, Tong A-J, Vergnes L, Takallou A, Zhang A, Wei X, Chilin LD, Wu Y, Semenkovich CF, Reue K, Smale ST, Lee B, Cheng G. 2022. Suppressing fatty acid synthase by type I interferon and chemical inhibitors as a broad spectrum anti-viral strategy against SARS-CoV-2. Acta Pharm Sin B 12:1624–1635. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lan J, Ge J, Yu J, Shan S, Zhou H, Fan S, Zhang Q, Shi X, Wang Q, Zhang L, Wang X. 2020. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581:215–220. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ye G, Liu B, Li F. 2022. Cryo-EM structure of a SARS-CoV-2 omicron spike protein ectodomain. Nat Commun 13:1214. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28882-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Henderson R, Edwards RJ, Mansouri K, Janowska K, Stalls V, Gobeil SMC, Kopp M, Li D, Parks R, Hsu AL, Borgnia MJ, Haynes BF, Acharya P. 2020. Controlling the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein conformation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 27:925–933. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0479-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, Goldsmith JA, Hsieh C-L, Abiona O, Graham BS, McLellan JS. 2020. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vannier M, Chewins J. 2019. Hydrogen peroxide vapour is an effective replacement for Formaldehyde in a BSL4 Foot and mouth disease vaccine manufacturing facility. Lett Appl Microbiol 69:237–245. doi: 10.1111/lam.13203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ragland NH, Miedel EL, Engelman RW. 2019. PCR prevalence of murine opportunistic microbes and their mitigation by using vaporized hydrogen peroxide. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 58:208–215. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Janik E, Bartos M, Niemcewicz M, Gorniak L, Bijak M. 2021. SARS-CoV-2: outline, prevention, and decontamination. Pathogens 10:114. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Newcomb WW, Brown JC. 2012. Internal catalase protects herpes simplex virus from inactivation by hydrogen peroxide. J Virol 86:11931–11934. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01349-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Khan NA, Kar M, Panwar A, Wangchuk J, Kumar S, Das A, Pandey AK, Lodha R, Medigeshi GR. 2021. Oxidative stress specifically inhibits replication of dengue virus. J Gen Virol 102. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ke Z, Peacock TP, Brown JC, Sheppard CM, Croll TI, Kotecha A, Goldhill DH, Barclay WS, Briggs JAG. 2024. Virion morphology and on-virus spike protein structures of diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants. EMBO J 43:6469–6495. doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00303-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Turoňová B, Sikora M, Schürmann C, Hagen WJH, Welsch S, Blanc FEC, von Bülow S, Gecht M, Bagola K, Hörner C, van Zandbergen G, Landry J, de Azevedo NTD, Mosalaganti S, Schwarz A, Covino R, Mühlebach MD, Hummer G, Krijnse Locker J, Beck M. 2020. In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges. Science 370:203–208. doi: 10.1126/science.abd5223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ke Z, Oton J, Qu K, Cortese M, Zila V, McKeane L, Nakane T, Zivanov J, Neufeldt CJ, Cerikan B, Lu JM, Peukes J, Xiong X, Kräusslich H-G, Scheres SHW, Bartenschlager R, Briggs JAG. 2020. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature 588:498–502. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2665-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yao H, Song Y, Chen Y, Wu N, Xu J, Sun C, Zhang J, Weng T, Zhang Z, Wu Z, Cheng L, Shi D, Lu X, Lei J, Crispin M, Shi Y, Li L, Li S. 2020. Molecular architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Cell 183:730–738. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Klein S, Cortese M, Winter SL, Wachsmuth-Melm M, Neufeldt CJ, Cerikan B, Stanifer ML, Boulant S, Bartenschlager R, Chlanda P. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 structure and replication characterized by in situ cryo-electron tomography. Nat Commun 11:5885. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19619-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Calder LJ, Calcraft T, Hussain S, Harvey R, Rosenthal PB. 2022. Electron cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 virions reveals cylinder-shaped particles with a double layer RNP assembly. Commun Biol 5:1210. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04183-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Liu C, Mendonça L, Yang Y, Gao Y, Shen C, Liu J, Ni T, Ju B, Liu C, Tang X, Wei J, Ma X, Zhu Y, Liu W, Xu S, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wu J, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Liu L, Wang P, Zhang P. 2020. The architecture of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with postfusion spikes revealed by cryo-EM and cryo-ET. Structure 28:1218–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tai L, Zhu G, Yang M, Cao L, Xing X, Yin G, Chan C, Qin C, Rao Z, Wang X, Sun F, Zhu Y. 2021. Nanometer-resolution in situ structure of the SARS-CoV-2 postfusion spike protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2112703118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112703118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Xie X, Muruato A, Lokugamage KG, Narayanan K, Zhang X, Zou J, Liu J, Schindewolf C, Bopp NE, Aguilar PV, Plante KS, Weaver SC, Makino S, LeDuc JW, Menachery VD, Shi P-Y. 2020. An infectious cDNA clone of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Host Microbe 27:841–848. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mastronarde DN. 2005. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J Struct Biol 152:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zheng SQ, Palovcak E, Armache J-P, Verba KA, Cheng Y, Agard DA. 2017. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 14:331–332. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rohou A, Grigorieff N. 2015. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol 192:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. 1996. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol 116:71–76. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang H, Liao S, Yu X, Zhang J, Zhou ZH. 2024. TomoNet: a streamlined cryogenic electron tomography software pipeline with automatic particle picking on flexible lattices. Biol Imaging 4:e7. doi: 10.1017/S2633903X24000060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zivanov J, Otón J, Ke Z, von Kügelgen A, Pyle E, Qu K, Morado D, Castaño-Díez D, Zanetti G, Bharat TAM, Briggs JAG, Scheres SHW. 2022. A Bayesian approach to single-particle electron cryo-tomography in RELION-4.0. Elife 11:e83724. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Cai Y, Zhang J, Xiao T, Peng H, Sterling SM, Walsh RM, Rawson S, Rits-Volloch S, Chen B. 2020. Distinct conformational states of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science 369:1586–1592. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. 2004. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Harvey WT, Carabelli AM, Jackson B, Gupta RK, Thomson EC, Harrison EM, Ludden C, Reeve R, Rambaut A, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, Peacock SJ, Robertson DL. 2021. SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:409–424. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00573-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wang L, Zhou H-Y, Li J-Y, Cheng Y-X, Zhang S, Aliyari S, Wu A, Cheng G. 2022. Potential intervariant and intravariant recombination of Delta and Omicron variants. J Med Virol 94:4830–4838. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Walls AC, Park Y-J, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. 2020. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181:281–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Elveborg S, Monteil VM, Mirazimi A. 2022. Methods of inactivation of highly pathogenic viruses for molecular, serology or vaccine development purposes. Pathogens 11:271. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Urushidani M, Kawayoshi A, Kotaki T, Saeki K, Mori Y, Kameoka M. 2022. Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus by dry fogging hypochlorous acid solution and hydrogen peroxide solution. PLoS One 17:e0261802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Capetti AF, Borgonovo F, Morena V, Lupo A, Cossu MV, Passerini M, Dedivitiis G, Rizzardini G. 2021. Short-term inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 by hydrogen peroxide in persistent nasopharyngeal carriers. J Med Virol 93:1766–1769. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tuladhar E, Terpstra P, Koopmans M, Duizer E. 2012. Virucidal efficacy of hydrogen peroxide vapour disinfection. J Hosp Infect 80:110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Becker B, Dabisch-Ruthe M, Pfannebecker J. 2020. Inactivation of murine norovirus on fruit and vegetable surfaces by vapor phase hydrogen peroxid. J Food Prot 83:45–51. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kingsley DH, Vincent EM, Meade GK, Watson CL, Fan X. 2014. Inactivation of human norovirus using chemical sanitizers. Int J Food Microbiol 171:94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Pavlova E, Genova-Kalou P, Dyankov G. 2023. Susceptibility of SARS COV-2 nucleocapsid and spike proteins to reactive oxygen species and role in inflammation. Anal Biochem 670:115137. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2023.115137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Minkoff JM, tenOever B. 2023. Innate immune evasion strategies of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:178–194. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00839-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Song Y, Yao H, Wu N, Xu J, Zhang Z, Peng C, Li S, Kong W, Chen Y, Zhu M, Wang J, Shi D, Zhao C, Lu X, Echavarría Galindo M, Li S. 2023. In situ architecture and membrane fusion of SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120:e2213332120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213332120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Caruso AA, Del Prete A, Lazzarino AI. 2020. Hydrogen peroxide and viral infections: a literature review with research hypothesis definition in relation to the current covid-19 pandemic. Med Hypotheses 144:109910. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Estienney M, Daval-Frerot P, Aho-Glélé L-S, Piroth L, Stabile P, Gerbet J-Y, Rouleau R, de Rougemont A, Belliot G. 2022. Use of a hydrogen peroxide nebulizer for viral disinfection of emergency ambulance and hospital waiting room. Food Environ Virol 14:217–221. doi: 10.1007/s12560-022-09519-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Patel U, Gingerich A, Widman L, Sarr D, Tripp RA, Rada B. 2018. Susceptibility of influenza viruses to hypothiocyanite and hypoiodite produced by lactoperoxidase in a cell-free system. PLoS One 13:e0199167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fluorescent microscopy and IC50 and CC50 of H2O2.
IC50 of H2O2.
Hydrogen peroxide efficacy against infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.
Negative staining TEM images of virions treated with 3% H2O2 and 4% PFA.
Key disulfide bonds that may facilitate the transition of the spike protein from its pre-fusion to post-fusion conformation.
Supplemental figure and table legends.
Spike count.
