Skip to main content
. 2025 May 2;10(18):18428–18443. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c10743

Figure 7.

Figure 7

A comparative outcome analysis of the antimicrobial study analysis of the cross-linked hydrogel-based scaffolds 3A5G0.25H, 3A5G0.5H, and 3A5G0.75H with respect to Gram-negative E. coli and Gram-positive S. aureus bacteria. Panels (a–c) represent the obtained CFU results with respect to E. coli and S. aureus bacterial strain. Panel (c) represents the comparative understanding of the number of CFUs on the culture samples with respect to two different types of bacterial strain. Panels (d, e) represent the obtained log reduction from the CFU study, with respect to E. coli and S. aureus bacteria. Panel (f) represent the comparative understanding of the obtained log reductions on the cultured samples with respect to E. coli and S. aureus bacteria. Panel (g) represents the plate pictures of the CFU study performed on the cross-linked hydrogel surface of 3A5G0.25H, 3A5G0.5H, and 3A5G0.75H.