Abstract
Transposon tagging provides an opportunity to construct large numbers of strains of organisms that differ by single insertional mutations. By scoring the phenotypes of these ``measured genotypes,'' powerful tests of effects of mutations on phenotypic expression have been performed. Here we extend this approach by constructing with simple crosses all possible two-locus genotypes for each of eight pairs of P-element insertions. Analysis of metabolic phenotypes (fat and glycogen contents, enzyme activities, total protein, and body weight) of the resulting nine genotypes provides direct estimates of additive, dominance, and epistatic effects of the mutations. Nested two-way analysis of variance identified significant epistatic effects in 27% of the tests (35/128 of the trait X P-element combinations). Posterior contrasts were performed to partition the epistatic variance into the four orthogonal components of COCKERHAM, and the data exhibit a tendency toward additive X dominance and dominance X dominance epistasis. Mutations in this study have epistatic effects on metabolic traits that are on the same order of magnitude as main (additive and dominance) effects. Measured genotypes have been used in other contexts to quantify epistatic effects on phenotypic expression, and these results are also briefly reviewed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (776.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cabot E. L., Davis A. W., Johnson N. A., Wu C. I. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):175–189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheverud J. M., Routman E. J. Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1455–1461. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark A. G., Feldman M. W. The estimation of epistasis in components of fitness in experimental populations of drosophila melanogaster II. Assessment of meiotic drive, viability, fecundity and sexual selection. Heredity (Edinb) 1981 Jun;46(3):347–377. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1981.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cockerham C C. An Extension of the Concept of Partitioning Hereditary Variance for Analysis of Covariances among Relatives When Epistasis Is Present. Genetics. 1954 Nov;39(6):859–882. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.6.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooley L., Kelley R., Spradling A. Insertional mutagenesis of the Drosophila genome with single P elements. Science. 1988 Mar 4;239(4844):1121–1128. doi: 10.1126/science.2830671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doebley J., Stec A. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):285–295. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doebley J., Stec A., Gustus C. teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):333–346. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards M. D., Stuber C. W., Wendel J. F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113–125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freriksen A., de Ruiter B. L., Scharloo W., Heinstra P. W. Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism and carbon-13 fluxes: opportunities for epistasis and natural selection. Genetics. 1994 Aug;137(4):1071–1078. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.4.1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gavrilets S., de Jong G. Pleiotropic models of polygenic variation, stabilizing selection, and epistasis. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):609–625. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson G. Epistasis and pleiotropy as natural properties of transcriptional regulation. Theor Popul Biol. 1996 Feb;49(1):58–89. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1996.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karlin S. General two-locus selection models: some objectives, results and interpretations. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Jun;7(3):364–398. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Long A. D., Mullaney S. L., Reid L. A., Fry J. D., Langley C. H., Mackay T. F. High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1273–1291. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palopoli M. F., Wu C. I. Genetics of hybrid male sterility between drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics. 1994 Oct;138(2):329–341. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson H. M., Preston C. R., Phillis R. W., Johnson-Schlitz D. M., Benz W. K., Engels W. R. A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):461–470. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanksley S. D. Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:205–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.001225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]