Abstract
Neurological disorders, including brain cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and ischemic/reperfusion injury, pose a significant threat to global human health. Due to the high metabolic demands of nerve cells, mitochondrial dysfunction is a critical feature of these disorders. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) is an evolutionarily conserved mitochondrial response, which is critical for maintaining mitochondrial and energetic homeostasis under stress. Previous studies have found that UPRmt participates in diverse physiological processes especially metabolism and immunity. Currently, increasing evidence suggest that targeted regulation of UPRmt can also effectively delay the progression of neurological diseases and improve patients’ prognosis. This review provides a comprehensive overview of UPRmt in the context of neurological diseases, with a particular emphasis on its regulatory functions. Additionally, we summarize the mechanistic insights into UPRmt in neurological disorders as investigated in preclinical studies, as well as its potential as a therapeutic target in the clinical management of neurological tumors. By highlighting the importance of UPRmt in the complex processes underlying neurological disorders, this review aims to bridge current knowledge gaps and inspire novel therapeutic strategies for these conditions.
Keywords: Mitochondria, unfolded protein response, neurological disorders, aging, therapy
Introduction
Cellular homeostasis is crucial for regulating various intracellular processes, such as protein folding, ion balance, and the removal of damaged organelles and proteins. 1 Disruptions in homeostasis can result in protein aggregation, calcium dysregulation, and impaired autophagy, all of which are implicated in the development of neurological disorders that severely impact human health.2,3 Neurons, with their exceptionally high metabolic demands, 4 depend on mitochondria to generate adenosine triphosphate (ATP) through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), which is vital for their structural and functional integrity. 5 Because of these energy requirements, neurons are particularly susceptible to mitochondrial dysfunction, which can lead to cognitive and motor deficits characteristic of numerous neurological conditions.
Recent studies underscore the critical role of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) in preserving mitochondrial proteostasis and cellular homeostasis. Under mitochondrial stress, UPRmt activation induces the expression of molecular chaperones and proteases that facilitate the recovery of mitochondrial function. This mechanism has garnered substantial interest, particularly in cancer research, where UPRmt contributes to tumor progression and resistance to therapy.6,7 Additionally, UPRmt has been extensively investigated in neurodegenerative diseases, offering insights into its fundamental role in sustaining cellular health. However, its involvement in the context of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, 8 especially in heart and brain, remains underexplored and merits further attention, as it may provide innovative perspectives for understanding cerebrovascular diseases and developing therapeutic strategies.
This review highlights the evolving understanding of UPRmt and its relevance across a range of neurological disorders, including brain cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and I/R injury. Furthermore, we discuss the role of UPRmt in shaping the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these conditions. Advancing our knowledge in this area could help redefine therapeutic targets and the optimal timing for interventions, as well as to identify novel targeted drugs and therapeutic strategies for neurological diseases within the context of clinical translation.
Physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms of UPRmt
Mitochondrial stress and protein misfolding
Mitochondria are essential to cellular energy metabolism, primarily generating ATP and participating in various biosynthetic pathways such as fatty acid synthesis, heme biogenesis, and calcium homeostasis. 9 The proteins required for these processes are primarily synthesized in the cytosol and imported into mitochondria, where they are essential for maintaining mitochondrial integrity.10–12 Upon entry into the mitochondria, mitochondrial chaperones, such as mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 (mtHsp70), facilitate the proper folding and assembly of these proteins into functional complexes.13,14
The proper function of mitochondria is critical for cellular health. Disruptions in mitochondrial function can lead to the accumulation of misfolded proteins within the mitochondrial matrix, triggering UPRmt, a sophisticated regulatory mechanism that restores mitochondrial function. This is achieved by enhancing the transcription of genes encoding mitochondrial chaperones and proteases. 15 Moreover, UPRmt adjusts cellular metabolism toward glycolysis and enhances reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, reducing cells’ dependence on mitochondria function during cellular stress. 16
Key components of UPRmt
Central to UPRmt are mitochondrial chaperones and proteases. Mitochondrial proteases, such as caseinolytic protease P (CLPP), work in concert with chaperones to manage and degrade misfolded proteins that accumulate under stress.17,18 This coordination action between chaperones and proteases is crucial for maintaining proteostasis within mitochondria.
The regulation of UPRmt is governed by several key proteins, including the transcription factor activating transcription factor associated with stress 1 (ATFS-1), which plays a crucial role in UPRmt regulation in C.elegans. When mitochondrial protein misfolding exceeds the capacity of mitochondrial chaperones, ATFS-1 is prevented from degradation in the mitochondria and instead translocates to the nucleus.18–20 In the nucleus, ATFS-1 promotes the expression of genes encoding mitochondrial chaperones and proteases, facilitating an adaptive response that is crucial for cellular resilience and recovery from mitochondrial stress.19,21,22
In mammalian systems, UPRmt regulation is more complex, involving three transcription factors: activating transcription factor 5 (ATF5), activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), all members of the basic leucine zipper (bZip) family.23–25
Crosstalk between UPRmt and UPRER
While ATF5 is mitochondria-specific, both CHOP and ATF4, are also involved in the regulating the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) unfolded protein response (UPRER), highlighting the complex interaction between mitochondrial and ER stress responses.7,26 Members of the bZIP family of transcription factors play crucial roles in the integrated stress response (ISR) under stress conditions. 9 The expression of these three bZIP proteins in mammalian cells requires activation of the ISR, which is primarily mediated by the phosphorylation of the eukaryotic initiation factor-2 alpha subunit (p-eIF2α). 27 The ISR-induced reduction in tRNA ternary complex formation suppresses global protein synthesis, alleviating the burden on mitochondrial protein folding. 28 However, it selectively triggers the translation of specific mRNAs with upstream open reading frames, such as ATF5, ATF4, and CHOP.29,30 The phosphorylation of eIF2α subsequently enhances the translation of ATF4. It has been reported that ATF5 expression is decreased in Chop-/- mouse embryonic fibroblasts under both basal and mitochondrial stress conditions, while ATF4 expression is upregulated in CHOP-deficient cells under stress. 25 These findings suggest that ATF4 may function upstream of CHOP, while ATF5 seems to be a downstream target of CHOP. Both ATF4 and CHOP are involved in activating UPRER, and although both transcription factors play roles in UPRmt, the activation of UPRER typically exceeds that of UPRmt.
A recent study also highlights the role of VMP1 in regulating ER-mitochondria interactions. Deletion of VMP1 disrupts the UPR balance by selectively activating PERK while suppressing IRE1α and ATF6, underscoring its key role in coordinating stress responses. This modulation ensures that the cell can manage ER stress without triggering harmful UPR overactivation. 31
This interdependence between UPRmt and UPRER not only ensures cellular survival under stress but also emphasizes the importance of maintaining the balance between these two systems.32,33 When this balance is disrupted, it may lead to pathological conditions such as neurodegenerative diseases, where both ER and mitochondrial dysfunction contribute to cellular damage and disease progression. 34 Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms through which UPRmt and UPRER communicate and regulate each other is essential for developing therapeutic strategies to address diseases caused by cellular stress.
UPRmt in cellular survival and stress response
The UPRmt plays a critical role in cellular survival under stress conditions, particularly when mitochondria are overwhelmed by unfolded proteins. 7 (Figure 1) Under such stress, UPRmt is activated to restore degrade misfolded proteins. This adaptive response is essential for maintaining mitochondrial health and cellular survival, as it helps mitigate mitochondrial dysfunction and protein aggregation, which could otherwise lead to cellular damage. 35 However, if UPRmt activation becomes unregulated or prolonged, it can overwhelm cellular homeostasis, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death. For instance, during sustained hypoxia, while UPRmt activation helps reduce hypoxia-induced mitochondrial protein aggregation (HIMPA), it is insufficient to completely protect the cell from death. 36 This suggests that excessive UPRmt activity can cause an imbalance in mitochondrial dynamics, possible leading to mitochondrial fragmentation or impaired bioenergetic function. Cell survival is ultimately enhanced when UPRmt works in concert with other mitochondrial quality control mechanisms, such as mitophagy and mitochondrial fusion, which help to clear damaged mitochondria and maintain mitochondrial integrity. This underscores the importance of understanding how UPRmt is coordinated with other stress responses to regulate cellular fate and prevent pathological outcomes.
Figure 1.
Summary of the molecular mechanisms of UPRmt. ATF5 can translocate to the mitochondria under conditions of mitochondrial stress. Once stress is detected, ATF5 moves to the nucleus where it promotes the transcription of mitochondrial chaperones, such as HSP10 and HSP60, as well as mitochondrial proteases. Both ATF4 and CHOP act upstream of ATF5, enhancing the expression of UPRmt-related genes and contributing to the activation of UPRER. In response to mitochondrial stress, the transcription of HSP10 and HSP60 is upregulated. Additionally, the activation of SIRT3 induces the deacetylation of FOXO3α, facilitating its relocalization to the nucleus and boosting the cell’s antioxidant capacity.
Emerging technologies in UPRmt research
Recent advances in omics technologies, including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and single-cell approaches, have substantially expanded our understanding of UPRmt. These high-throughput methods provide comprehensive and quantitative insights into how UPRmt is regulated across different cellular contexts and stress conditions.
Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses have enabled the identification of UPRmt-associated gene and protein expression profiles under physiological and pathological stress.24,37–39 These approaches have revealed that the activation of UPRmt involves coordinated changes in mitochondrial chaperones, proteases, and metabolic regulators. In particular, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), as an extension of transcriptomic analysis, allows for the resolution of cell-type-specific UPRmt responses, uncovering heterogeneous activation patterns that would be masked in bulk analyses. For example, scRNA-seq has been widely applied in cancer research to characterize UPRmt-related transcriptional alterations within the tumor microenvironment,40,41 demonstrating its utility in dissecting complex tissue heterogeneity.
In addition, by analyzing the transcriptional landscape of individual cells, scRNA-seq enables the identification of distinct UPRmt activation patterns, helping to determine how different cellular populations respond to mitochondrial stress. Furthermore, time-course transcriptomic studies suggest that UPRmt activation may transition from an adaptive to a maladaptive response, underscoring the importance of precise temporal control when considering UPRmt-targeted interventions. 42 Notably, single-cell techniques can also be integrated with spatial transcriptomics to spatially map regions of high UPRmt activity within tissue sections. This approach is particularly valuable for investigating UPRmt responses in pathologically affected regions of the nervous system, where it may help elucidate the influence of local microenvironmental factors on UPRmt regulation.43,44
In parallel, advanced imaging techniques such as super-resolution microscopy and live-cell imaging have provided spatiotemporal insights into UPRmt dynamics. These tools have been used to visualize the localization of key UPRmt components and track mitochondrial remodeling in real time under stress conditions. For instance, the redistribution of mitochondrial chaperones and the morphological changes of mitochondria can be directly observed in response to UPRmt activation.45,46
Collectively, advancements in omics and imaging technologies have significantly enhanced our understanding of UPRmt regulation and function. These technologies provide high-resolution insights into UPRmt activation across different cell types and stress conditions, offering valuable tools for elucidating its physiological and pathological roles and accelerating the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.
UPRmt in aging
Aging is a crucial physiological process in the lifecycle, influencing various cellular mechanisms, including mitochondrial function. UPRmt was initially identified as a pivotal mechanism in aging in C. elegans. The knockdown of various UPRmt components, including ubiquitin-like protein 5 (UBL-5), defective proVentriE 1 (DVE-1), HSP6, HSP60, and CLPP-1, has been shown to suppress lifespan extension. 47 Furthermore, knockout of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1(cco-1), a key component of respiratory chain complex IV, activates the UPRmt and consequently extends lifespan. 47 In a similar vein, depletion of the mitochondrial complex IV assembly protein Surf1 results in UPRmt activation, enhancing resistance to oxidative stress-induced cell death. 48 These findings demonstrate that silencing genes that regulate UPRmt can reduce lifespan, while targeted knockout of electron transport chain (ETC) components can promote lifespan extension through UPRmt activation.
Several epigenetic regulators have been implicated in sustaining UPRmt activation and promoting lifespan extension across species, from worms to humans. 49 A recent study revealed that the heat shock factor binding protein 1 (HSB-1)/HSF1 pathway enhances longevity by upregulating histone H4 expression. This increase in histone H4 protein levels results in the compaction of both nuclear and mitochondrial chromatin, subsequently reducing the transcription of mitochondrial genes and activating the UPRmt, thereby promoting lifespan extension.50,51 The sirtuin family is closely linked with UPRmt and longevity. Specifically, silent information regulator 2.1 (Sir-2.1), a homolog of SIRT1 in C. elegans, plays a pivotal role in this process. Deletion of Sir-2.1 inhibits the induction of HSP-6, thereby suppressing UPRmt and impairing lifespan extension.52,53 Moreover, supplementation with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) activates Sir-2.1-mediated UPRmt, delaying the aging process. 52 SIRT1 directly deacetylates mitochondrial ribosomal protein S5 (MRPS5), thereby initiating UPRmt. The knockout of MRPS5 enhances the expression of ATF4 and ATF5, triggering UPRmt activation and promoting extending lifespan. 54 Additionally, SIRT3 has been shown to regulate antioxidant activity and extend longevity through UPRmt activation.55,56
In mammals, distinct regulatory mechanisms of UPRmt contribute to longevity. Increasing evidence underscores the importance of UPRmt in activating stem cells, thereby offering protection against senescence. Supplementation with nicotinamide riboside in mouse chow has been shown to induce UPRmt, which helps prevent senescence in muscle stem cells (MuSC), neural stem cells (NSC), and melanocyte stem cells (McSC). 57 In hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), SIRT7 has been identified as a key regulator of UPRmt that is essential for maintaining HSC function during aging. 58 Moreover, UPRmt is elevated in NSCs with aging, where SIRT7 plays a protective role by mitigating mitochondrial protein folding stress. Overexpression of SIRT7 has been shown to enhance neurogenesis and improves cognitive function in aged mice. 59 However, constitutive activation of UPRmt, particularly with tissue-specific loss of the mitochondrial chaperone protein HSP60, can have detrimental effects, leading to the loss of stemness in intestinal stem cells (ISCs). 60 Further research is needed to clarify how the relative level of UPRmt signaling influences stem cells function and the extent to which these effects are context-dependent.
The regulatory role of UPRmt in tissues and organs is crucial for modulation aging. It has been reported that UPRmt activity is increased in the hearts of aged mice. 61 In heart tissues from 13 mammalian and avian species, the expression of HSP60 has been found to correlate positively with maximum lifespan. However, research exploring the role of UPRmt in cardiac aging remains limited. Further studies are needed to determine whether UPRmt is a fundamental mechanism for promoting longevity in both basic research and clinical settings, especially with regard to cardiac aging. Moreover, a study examining serum transcriptomics after exercise in young and older adults highlighted an age-related decline in the adaptive transcriptional response of UPR following a single bout of exercise. This decline may contribute to reduced exercise responsiveness with advancing age. 62 Given the critical role of UPRmt in the aging, particularly in motor function, further investigation is necessary to elucidate its effects and underlying mechanisms.
UPRmt in cancer
As aging contributes to mitochondrial dysfunction, this process is also implicated in the altered cellular homeostasis observed in cancer, where UPRmt plays a crucial role in maintaining mitochondrial integrity and promoting tumor progression. The initiation and progression of cancer are complex processes during which cancer cells activate UPRmt to maintain proteostasis and regulate metabolic reactions. 63 Additionally, UPRmt activation plays a critical role in tumor metastasis. Numerous studies have identified individual components of UPRmt as promoters of tumor growth. However, recent research highlights the broader role of UPRmt in alleviating mitochondrial stress and promoting tumor proliferation. 64 Given its tumor-supportive function, targeting specific UPRmt proteins to inhibit tumor growth has emerged as a novel and intensely researched therapeutic strategy. Both upstream signaling molecules and downstream effector proteins of UPRmt have shown efficacy in experimental and clinical studies. Encouragingly, several inhibitors targeting these proteins have advanced to clinical trials, demonstrating promising preclinical results. 65 (Table 1).
Table 1.
Key cancer therapeutics that target the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt).
| Target Protein | Drug/compound | Clinical/research stage | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATF5 | Dominant-Negative ATF5 (DN-ATF5) | Preclinical | 71 |
| HSP60/HSP10 Complex | Mizoribine | Phase I | 150 |
| Epolactaene | Preclinical | 81 | |
| gold (III) porphyrin complexes | Preclinical | 82 | |
| 5-sulfonamido-2-phenylbenzoxazole | Preclinical | 83 | |
| salicylanilide hybrid analogues | Preclinical | 83 | |
| mtHSP70 | MKT 077 | Phase I | 84 |
| JG-231 | Preclinical | 85 | |
| LONP1 | CDDO-Me | Phase I | 91 |
| CLPP | ONC201 | Phase I/II | NCT02250781 |
An upstream signaling molecules in the UPRmt - ATF5
ATF5, a member of the bZip family of transcription factors, 66 plays a crucial role in upregulating the transcription of UPRmt components during mitochondrial stress. 23 ATF5 facilitates tumor growth and progression by maintaining mitochondrial proteostasis, resulting in unfavorable outcomes for cancer patients. ATF5 expression is notably elevated in patients with glioblastoma and its high expression levels are associated with poorer survival rates in glioma cancer patients.67,68 Additionally, ATF5 modulates the expression of various anti-apoptotic genes in cancer cells. For example, it regulates the expression of early growth response 1 (Egr-1) in glioma cells, promoting cell proliferation. 69 ATF5 also transactivates B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) in glioma cells, enhancing their survival. 70 The detrimental effects of ATF5 have been corroborated by an increasing body of experimental evidence. Consequently, researchers are focusing on modulating its expression as a strategy to impede tumor progression.
Researchers have engineered a modified version of the ATF5 protein, in which the DNA-binding domain was altered to abrogate its transcriptional activity. A dominant-negative ATF5 mutant (DN-ATF5), which lacks of DNA-binding capability, has been developed. This mutant effectively blocks certain signaling pathways within cells and has been synthesized to selectively induce apoptosis in a broad spectrum of treatment-resistant tumors in murine models. 71 The DN-ATF5 peptides had a pronounced and tumor-selective efficacy, promoting them as promising candidates for clinical trials. Furthermore, other upstream signaling molecules, such as ERα,72,73 single-stranded DNA binding protein 1 (SSBP1) 74 and HSF1 75 , have also been identified as potential cancer therapy targets. Further preclinical trials are required to access their targeting potential and therapeutic effectiveness.
Downstream effector proteins in the UPRmt -Heat shock protein (HSP)
UPRmt-specific chaperones, particularly the HSP60/HSP10 complex, are among the most extensively studied targets in cancer therapy. Knockdown of HSP60 inhibits cell proliferation in glioblastoma and suppresses tumor growth.76,77 Similarly, HSP10 is often overexpressed in astrocytoma and is correlated with higher recurrence rates in these patients. Elevated HSP10 levels are also associated with reduced overall survival in astrocytoma cases. Like HSP60, mtHSP70 performs essential housekeeping functions and mediates the refolding of misfolded proteins. Knockdown of mtHSP70 has been shown to inhibit proliferation, migration, and invasion in various cancer cell lines.78–80
It has been established that numerous inhibitors interact effectively with the HSP60/HSP10 complex. Notably, compounds derived from Eupenicillium brefeldianum have demonstrated the ability to bind to this chaperonin complex. The safety profiles of these drugs have been confirmed through randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase I clinical trials. However, mizoribine, an active compound extracted from Eupenicillium brefeldianum, exhibited limited bioavailability of approximately 30 μM in humans, which is insufficient to inhibit the HSP60/HSP10 complex at this concentration. Furthermore, additional molecules, such as Epolactaene, gold (III) porphyrin complexes, 5-sulfonamido-2-phenylbenzoxazole, and salicylanilide hybrid analogues targeting HSP60, have been identified or synthesized.81–83 However, the specificity and efficacy of these compounds require further investigation before clinical advancement.
MKT 077 (3-Methylindolium-2-ylmethylene-3-methyl-1-propylindolium-2,3-dithioate chloride), a rhodacyanine dye, has been shown to reduce the chaperone activity of mtHSP70. A phase I clinical trial demonstrated that MKT 077 can inhibit mitochondrial functions. 84 Structure-based design has led to the development of novel rhodacyanine analogues, such as JG-231, to enhance selectivity and bioavailability. However, challenges such as light sensitivity and difficulties in synthesis and solubilization must be addressed before these compounds can proceed to clinical trials. 85
Targeting UPRmt-specific proteases in cancer
Lon peptidase 1 (LONP1)
Mitochondrial proteins undergoing folding are susceptible to aggregation. LONP1 plays a pivotal role in cleaving these aggregates into short peptides for clearance, thereby maintaining mitochondrial proteostasis. 86 Elevated LONP1 expression has been observed in various tumors, including melanoma, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and colorectal cancer.87–89 Moreover, increased LONP1 levels correlate with reduced overall survival in neuroblastoma patients. LONP1 regulates the expression of Bcl-2, cyclin D1, and β-catenin in several tumor types.87,89,90 Knockdown of LONP1 results in decreased expression of MMP2, MMP9, and phosphorylated JNK, 89 suggesting that LONP1 may be a potential target for inhibiting migratory and invasive capabilities of cancer cells.
CDDO-Me, a triterpenoid compound derived from both natural and synthetic methods, inhibits LONP1-mediated proteolysis in cancer cells, inducing apoptosis. 91 A nonrandomized Phase I clinical trial of CDDO-Me (NCT00508807) was conducted to evaluate dose-limiting toxicities and establish the maximum tolerated dose, providing important guidance for Phase II studies. Furthermore, CDDO-Me impedes multiple tumor-supportive pathways, underscoring its therapeutic potential. Future research should continue to explore this compound, as well as other specific inhibitors.
Clpp
Like LONP1, CLPP accepts protein substrates for degradation. 92 CLPP interacts with several respiratory chain proteins and metabolic enzymes in mitochondria, playing a essential role in metabolic regulation within cancer cells. 93
The reduction in CLPP is associated with decreases levels of cyclin A, B1, D1, and MMP7, and inhibition of PI3K and AKT activation, collectively leading to reduced proliferation, migration, and invasion of various cancer cells.93–95 Interestingly, elevated CLPP levels in cervical cancer cells promote cisplatin resistance by inhibiting cisplatin accumulation, reducing the chemotherapy efficacy. 96 Thus, the role of UPRmt in chemotherapy resistance warrants further investigation to improve patient outcomes.
The imipridone ONC201 binds to and hyperactivates CLPP, inducing excessive proteolysis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell death across multiple cancer cell lines. 97 A Phase I dose-escalation study has demonstrated a favorable safety profile for ONC201 at the recommended Phase II dose of 625 mg per week. However, initially designed to inactivate AKT/ERK signaling and inhibit the dopamine receptor D2, the potential of ONC201 to target CLPP warrants further investigation. 93
UPRmt in neurological disorders
Neurodegenerative diseases
Mitochondrial dysfunction is a well-known pathological mechanism underlying age-associated neurodegenerative diseases. A growing body of evidence suggests that the accumulation of unfolded, misfolded, or aberrant proteins is a hallmark of neurodegenerative disorders.98,99
Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide, characterized by the intracellular accumulation of phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau) in neurofibrillary tangles and extracellular aggregation of amyloid-β (Aβ) in senile plaques.100,101 Emerging evidence suggests that in the early stages of AD pathogenesis, UPRER plays a protective role by limiting the formation of neurofibrillary tangles and shielding cells from tau-mediated neurotoxicity.102–104 However, as AD progresses, the continued accumulation of Aβ or p-Tau leads to sustained endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), which contributes to synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration. 105 Notably, there is growing evidence that upregulation of X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1s) can mitigate Aβ neurotoxicity and promote clearance of pathological tau in C. elegans via the activation of UPRER. Moreover, forced expression of XBP1s in the hippocampus of transgenic AD mice has been shown to reduce Aβ burden, enhance synaptic plasticity, and improve cognitive performance. 106 Consistently, as revealed by proteomic profiling, hippocampal overexpression of XBP1 restored the expression of multiple synaptic proteins, as well as key regulators of actin cytoskeleton dynamics and axonal growth. 107 Together, these findings underscore the critical role of ER stress dysregulation and aberrant activation of UPR sensors and downstream effectors in the pathological progression of AD.
In parallel with studies of UPRER, UPRmt has emerged as a new focal point in AD research. In human studies, Beck et al. reported the activation of UPRmt in frontal cortex samples from both sporadic and familial AD cases, with significantly elevated levels of UPRmt-related genes such as HSP60, HSP10, CLPP, and YME1L1.108,109 Experimental models have further corroborated these findings. Sorrentino et al. demonstrated that Aβ-induced UPRmt activation in both C. elegans and murine models, helped reduce harmful protein accumulation and deposition by restoring mitochondrial function, thereby mitigating Aβ toxicity and delaying disease progression. 110 Furthermore, robust activation of UPRmt was shown to protect against Aβ-induced toxicity in mouse brains, human SHSY5Y cells, and neurons exhibiting AD-like pathological features, including Aβ aggregation. In contrast, pharmacological inhibition of UPRmt exacerbated Aβ toxicity, highlighting its protective role.111,112
The therapeutic potential of targeting UPRmt in AD has gained further support with the development of specific drugs. For instance, Honokiol (HKL, C18H18O2), a natural derived from the bark of Magnolia officinalis, has been shown to activate mitophagy, induce UPRmt, reduce oxidative stress, and restore mitochondrial dynamics in the hippocampus. 113 These findings suggest that activating UPRmt can mitigate symptoms during the pathological development of AD, and that enhancing UPRmt activation may present a promising therapeutic strategy for AD treatment.
Parkinson’s disease (PD)
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by the progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta of the brain. The proteins Parkin and PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) play critical roles in this process by rescuing the phenotypes effects associated with the loss of mortalin. They achieve this by enhancing lysosomal-mediated mitochondrial clearance, which requires intact autophagic machinery.114–117
Recent studies have revealed that UPR is also integral to the progression of PD. ScRNA-seq has revealed activation of the UPRER pathway in the midbrain tissue of individuals with idiopathic PD, suggesting an ongoing ER stress response in affected neuronal populations. 118 In parallel, studies using C. elegans models of PD have shown that loss-of-function mutations in PINK1, Parkin, and parkinson disease protein 7 (PARK7) can induce UPRmt, which appears to confer neuroprotection by attenuating dopaminergic neuronal loss. 119
Various interventions targeting UPRmt have been developed across cell lines and animal models to delay PD progression. Studies using 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)-treated SHSY5Y cells further elucidated the relationship between UPRmt and mitochondrial dysfunction, with UPRmt activation evidenced by increased expression of mitochondrial chaperones, proteases, and transcription mediators. These findings underscore the therapeutic potential of activating UPRmt to mitigate mitochondrial dysfunction, a hallmark of PD pathogenesis. 120
In Drosophila melanogaster models, ginseng protein has been shown to delay the onset of Parkinson-like phenotypes in PINK1-deficient flies, as evidenced by prolonged lifespan and improved motor function. 121 Additionally, S-(+)-linalool, a major component in essential oils, has demonstrated significant neuroprotective effects against 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced damage in dopaminergic neurons and has been shown to enhance UPRmt in C. elegans, positioning it as a promising candidate for PD therapy. 122
These emerging therapeutic strategies emphasize the complexity of PD and highlight the need for further validation in mammalian models to confirm their efficacy and the translation of these findings into clinical practice.
Huntington’s disease (HD)
Huntington’s disease (HD) is a fatal, inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive motor, cognitive, and psychiatric decline over a span of 15–20 years following symptom onset. 123 The disorder is caused by an abnormal expansion of Cytosine-Adenine-Guanine (CAG) repeats within the huntingtin gene, resulting in the production of a mutant huntingtin protein (mtHtt) with an extended polyglutamine (polyQ) tract in its N-terminus.124,125 In HD, chronic activation of UPRmt due to the accumulation of mut-Htt causes mitochondrial dysfunction, elevated oxidative stress, and the buildup of damaged mitochondria. This is accompanied by reduced levels of critical chaperones like Grp75 and Hsp60, which further contribute to neuronal damage and cell death. 126 The ongoing stress overwhelms UPRmt’s protective capacity, leading to mitochondrial failure and aggravating neurodegeneration.
Mutant huntingtin impairs UPRmt by destabilizing ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 10(ABCB10) mRNA, which highlights a promising therapeutic target for reducing neuronal loss in the striatum and improving motor performance in HD. 127 To better understand the pathophysiological role of UPRmt in HD, Almeida et al. developed a pheochromocytoma 12 (PC12) HD cell model that key features of the disease, including activation of the integrated stress response and disruptions in UPRmt and heat shock response pathways. 126 This N-terminal HD model is instrumental for elucidating the roles of stress response pathways in HD pathogenesis and for conducting preliminary assessments of therapeutic interventions targeting these pathways. By providing a robust experimental platform, this model significantly expands the prospects for developing novel UPRmt-targeted therapies in HD.
Other neurodegenerative diseases
TAR DNA-binding protein 43(TDP-43) proteinopathy is defined by the accumulation of TDP-43-immunoreactive inclusion bodies in affected tissues. Clinically, it presents across a spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases, including dementia (notably frontotemporal lobar degeneration, FTLD) and motor neuron disease (MND).128–131 Elevated experssion of TDP-43 has been shown to induce mitochondrial dysfunction, characterized by a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential and an increase in ROS production. Moreover, TDP-43 has been demonstrated to activate UPRmt in both cellular and animal models. Downregulation of the mitochondrial protease LONP1 exacerbates TDP-43-induced mitochondrial dysfunction by promoting the accumulation of mitochondrial TDP-43, thereby accelerating neurodegeneration. 132 These findings highlight UPRmt as a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of TDP-43 proteinopathies.
Mutations in the mitochondrial protease pitrilysin metallopeptidase 1 (PITRM1), which is essential for processing and degrading of mitochondrial precursor proteins, have also been identified in neurodegenerative diseases. PITRM1 deficiency robustly induces UPRmt activation and enhances mitochondrial clearance in neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells(iPSCs). Furthermore, PITRM1-knockout neurons exhibit elevated levels of amyloid precursor protein and Aβ. This PITRM1-related syndrome, characterized by impaired mitochondrial presequence processing, triggers early UPRmt activation, which subsequently impacts cytosolic quality control pathways. Clinically, this condition manifests as a slowly progressive syndrome with features such as cerebellar ataxia, psychotic episodes, obsessive behavior, and cognitive decline. 112 These findings establish a mechanistic link between mitochondrial function and neurodegenerative proteinopathies, reaffirming UPRmt as a promising therapeutic target for these debilitating disorders.
Ischemia/reperfusion injury
I/R injury occurs when the blood supply to previously ischemic tissues is restored, often resulting in more extensive functional injury. The pathological mechanisms underlying I/R injury are multifactorial and complex. However, mitochondrial dysfunction serves as a central contributor to the progression of I/R injury.133–135 Upon reperfusion, mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction leads to ATP depletion, ROS accumulation, and oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA and proteins, ultimately promoting cellular apoptosis and necrosis.134,136 Emerging data indicate that the degree of mitochondrial disruption during I/R is a critical determinant of the severity of tissue or organ injury.137–139
Given that UPRmt has been shown to reduce ROS production and alleviates oxidative stress, there has been growing interest in its potential role of UPRmt in I/R injury. For instance, Wang et al. demonstrated that pharmacologic activation of UPRmt using oligomycin or doxycycline could protect the heart from I/R injury in an ATF5-dependent manner. 8 In this study, oligomycin and doxycycline were administered 6 h prior to ex-vivo heart I/R injury, leading to obviously upregulated of several known UPRmt-related genes and a reduction in infarct sizes. However, silencing ATF5 abolished the protective effects of these compounds, underscoring the importance of ATF5 in UPRmt-mediated protection. Ji et al. also reported that UPRmt is slightly activated in murine hearts subjected to I/R injury, and that enhancing UPRmt activation could alleviate heart I/R injury, whereas inhibition of UPRmt exacerbated the damage. 140
In a related study, our team recently found that inducing ATF5-mediated UPRmt could ameliorate mitochondrial dysfunction in neurons following oxygen-glucose deprivation or cerebral ischemia, providing further evidence for the neuroprotective role of UPRmt in ischemic stroke. 141 Additionally, our studies demonstrated that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug meclizine can activate UPRmt, suggesting that this drug may serve as a novel translational neuroprotective strategy for mitigating mitochondrial dysfunction in stroke. This approach holds promise for harnessing UPRmt to develop effective therapies aimed at addressing the complex pathology of I/R injury.
Furthermore, research into UPRmt modulation in cardiac disease, has extended the cerebral I/R injury. In cardiac tissue, Sirtuin-3(Sirt3) has been shown to activate the mRNA expression of UPRmt-related genes via the AMPK pathway, thereby improving metabolic remodeling and reducing cardiac hypertrophy. 142 Building on this work, recent studies have demonstrated that overexpression of Sirt3 protects neuronal mitochondria from post-ischemic dysfunction by activating UPRmt through the forkhead box O3 (Foxo3)/sphingosine kinase 1 (Sphk1) pathway. 143 Inhibition of either UPRmt or the Foxo3/Sphk1 pathway diminishes the beneficial effects of Sirt3 on neural function and mitochondrial integrity. Conversely, overexpression of Sphk1 alone has been shown to reduce infarction size, attenuate neuroinflammation, preserve neuronal viability, and prevent mitochondrial dysfunction during post-ischemic brain injury. Therefore, UPRmt plays a critical role in protecting neural viability and maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis, and the Sirt3/Foxo3/Sphk1 pathway emerges as a promising therapeutic target for ischemic stroke. (Figure 2)
Figure 2.
I/R injury causes mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to ATP depletion, ROS accumulation, and oxidative damage, which ultimately contributes to cell apoptosis and necrosis. UPRmt, by reducing ROS production and alleviating oxidative stress, plays a protective role in I/R injury. Pharmacologic activation of UPRmt using agents like oligomycin and doxycycline has shown promise in mitigating heart I/R injury in an ATF5-dependent manner. Additionally, UPRmt activation in cerebral ischemia and stroke models has demonstrated neuroprotective effects by ameliorating mitochondrial dysfunction. The Sirt3/Foxo3/Sphk1 pathway, which modulates UPRmt, emerges as a potential therapeutic target for ischemic stroke, emphasizing the importance of UPRmt in protecting mitochondria and neural viability during I/R injury.
Perspective
UPRmt plays a critical role in maintaining mitochondrial proteostasis and overall cellular function. While significant strides have been made in understanding the physiological and pathological mechanisms underlying UPRmt, many questions remain unanswered, and there are numerous opportunities for further investigation. Future research should focus on several key areas to expand our understanding of UPRmt’s complexity and therapeutic potential.
Expanding the understanding of UPRmt in mammalian systems
Current knowledge of UPRmt activation and regulation is primarily derived from model organisms such as C. elegans, and while valuable, this research does not fully capture the complexity seen in mammalian systems. Recent work has suggested that mammalian systems involve multiple transcription factors and signaling networks, which probably involve multiple transcription factors and signaling networks, coordinating UPRmt activation under both physiological and stress-induced conditions. As such, future studies should explore the tissue-specific regulation of UPRmt in response to various forms of cellular stress, including oxidative stress, nutrient deprivation, and protein misfolding. Detailed understanding of how different tissues and cell types regulate UPRmt could provide insights into how to fine-tune UPRmt responses to treat diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction.
Interplay between UPRmt and other cellular stress pathways
Moreover, UPRmt does not operate in isolation but likely interacts with other cellular stress responses, such as UPRER. Recent research has highlighted interactions between UPRmt and UPRER in cancer cells, which influence both cell survival and apoptosis. 26 Investigating these interactions will enhance our understanding of how cells manage multiple stress pathways to maintain homeostasis, particularly in the context of chronic diseases that are often multifactorial. Understanding these complex cross-talks may offer new insights into disease mechanisms and provide opportunities for therapeutic intervention.
Therapeutic potential and strategies for targeting UPRmt
The therapeutic potential of modulating UPRmt is an exciting area of investigation, particularly for diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, such as neurodegenerative disorders. 34
Recent studies have highlighted promising pharmacological agents, such as meclizine, which aim to enhance or restore UPRmt activity to maintain mitochondrial health. Several strategies can be considered for targeting UPRmt, including the overexpression of mitochondrial chaperones, the use of antioxidants, and precision modulation of UPRmt. 141
Enhancing UPRmt by overexpressing mitochondrial chaperones, such as mtHSP70 and HSP60, is one potential approach. This can improve mitochondrial protein-folding capacity, restore mitochondrial homeostasis, and protect cells from stress. However, careful regulation is necessary, as overexpression could result in unwanted cellular stress or an imbalance in mitochondrial function.
UPRmt is activated under oxidative stress and plays a role in mitigating oxidative damage by promoting ROS scavenging to protect mitochondrial function. However, its antioxidant capacity is limited, and thus, combining UPRmt modulation with antioxidants may enhance its ability to maintain cellular homeostasis. This synergistic approach could strengthen the overall stress response, improving the balance between mitochondrial function and oxidative stress. Such a combination may offer more effective neuroprotection, particularly in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, by supporting both mitochondrial function and oxidative defense. Additionally, the combined use of antioxidants and UPRmt overexpression may achieve better therapeutic efficacy, providing a more comprehensive strategy for maintaining mitochondrial health and cellular function.
Given UPRmt’s dual roles in cellular survival and death, future therapies should focus on selectively modulating its activation based on the disease context. The therapeutic potential of targeting UPRmt is particularly promising for diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, such as neurodegenerative disorders like AD and PD. In these diseases, UPRmt activation is often constitutive, driven by ongoing mitochondrial dysfunction, in contrast to its transient activation during acute stress. While in acute conditions, UPRmt plays a protective role by aiding mitochondrial protein folding through the activation of chaperones and proteases, its chronic activation in neurodegenerative diseases may exacerbate cellular dysfunction, contributing to disease progression. Therefore, therapeutic strategies should aim to precisely modulate UPRmt activation—enhancing it during acute stress while suppressing excessive activation in chronic conditions to protect cells from further damage.
Biomarkers for UPRmt activity and disease monitoring
Additionally, reliable biomarkers that reflect UPRmt activity are essential for advancing both research and clinical applications. Recent efforts have focused on identifying UPRmt-related biomarkers using multi-omics approaches, which may be useful for early diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression.144–146 The identification of biomarkers specific to UPRmt is essential for the advancement of precision medicine and the development of personalized therapeutic strategies.
Leveraging emerging technologies to advance UPRmt research
To further accelerate progress in the UPRmt field, integrating advanced omics and imaging technologies will be essential. Multi-omics platforms—including transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics—offer comprehensive insights into UPRmt regulatory networks under diverse cellular conditions. In particular, single-cell and spatial transcriptomic approaches enable the characterization of cell-type-specific and region-specific UPRmt activity, which is especially valuable in complex tissues such as the brain. 147 Moreover, advanced live-cell and super-resolution imaging techniques allow for real-time monitoring of UPRmt dynamics and mitochondrial remodeling in response to stress.148,149 The application of these technologies will not only facilitate the discovery of precise biomarkers but also aid in defining therapeutic windows, refining intervention strategies, and enabling the development of targeted, context-specific therapies. Continued advancement and integration of these tools will be pivotal in translating UPRmt biology into effective clinical applications.
Conclusion
In summary, the loss of mitochondrial proteostasis leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, which is a central factor implicated in a wide range of pathologies, especially for brain disorders. (Figure 3) This dysfunction results in impaired energy production, increased oxidative stress, and the accumulation of damaged proteins, all of which contribute to disease progression. The activation of UPRmt has demonstrated beneficial effects in numerous models of neurological disorders, including I/R injury and neurodegenerative diseases, as well as in the physiological aging process. These findings highlight the critical role of UPRmt in maintaining mitochondrial function and protecting cells from stress-induced damage.
Figure 3.
The relationship between UPRmt -associated regulators and various human disorders is complex and multifaceted. Upstream regulators and downstream effectors of the UPRmt influence the pathological processes of numerous human disorders, including ischemic/reperfusion injury, cancer, aging, and neurodegenerative diseases. These influences are mediated through different signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms.
Notably, in the context of cancer, the situation is contrary. Cancer cells often exploit mitochondrial pathways to support their rapid growth and survival, and the activation of UPRmt can sometimes enhance these processes. This paradox underscores the complexity of mitochondrial mechanisms across different pathological conditions and suggests that a nuanced approach will be necessary when considering UPRmt as a therapeutic target in cancer therapy.
Given its crucial role in mitochondrial health, modulating UPRmt has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for complex diseases that severely impact quality of life and for which no curative treatments currently exist. Precise modulation of UPRmt pathways holds the potential to restore mitochondrial function, alleviate cellular stress, and mitigate disease progression. Future research should aim to elucidate the intricate mechanisms governing UPRmt activation and regulation, while also developing targeted therapeutic strategies capable of selectively modulating these pathways in various disease states.
In conclusion, UPRmt represents a promising frontier in the development of novel therapies for a wide range of neurological diseases. Its critical role in maintaining mitochondrial integrity underscores its significance in cellular health and longevity. As our understanding of UPRmt continues to advance, so does the potential for developing innovative therapeutic strategies to mitigate mitochondrial dysfunction, a key driver of numerous debilitating diseases.
Footnotes
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 82371470, 82027802.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iDs: Di Wu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-7362
Xunming Ji https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5315-1404
References
- 1.Liu BH, Xu CZ, Liu Y, et al. Mitochondrial quality control in human health and disease. Mil Med Res 2024; 11: 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Galy B, Conrad M, Muckenthaler M. Mechanisms controlling cellular and systemic iron homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2024; 25: 133–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Newton K, Strasser A, Kayagaki N, et al. Cell death. Cell 2024; 187: 235–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Iwata R, Casimir P, Vanderhaeghen P. Mitochondrial dynamics in postmitotic cells regulate neurogenesis. Science 2020; 369: 858–862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.DiLuca M, Olesen J. The cost of brain diseases: a burden or a challenge? Neuron 2014; 82: 1205–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yoneda T, Benedetti C, Urano F, et al. Compartment-specific perturbation of protein handling activates genes encoding mitochondrial chaperones. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 4055–4066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhao Q, Wang J, Levichkin IV, et al. A mitochondrial specific stress response in mammalian cells. EMBO J 2002; 21: 4411–4419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang YT, Lim Y, McCall MN, et al. Cardioprotection by the mitochondrial unfolded protein response requires ATF5. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2019; 317: H472–H478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.An H, Zhou B, Ji X. Mitochondrial quality control in acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021; 41: 3157–3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wiedemann N, Pfanner N. Mitochondrial machineries for protein import and assembly. Annu Rev Biochem 2017; 86: 685–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mapa K, Sikor M, Kudryavtsev V, et al. The conformational dynamics of the mitochondrial Hsp70 chaperone. Mol Cell 2010; 38: 89–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Burkhart JM, Taskin AA, Zahedi RP, et al. Quantitative profiling for substrates of the mitochondrial presequence processing protease reveals a set of nonsubstrate proteins increased upon proteotoxic stress. J Proteome Res 2015; 14: 4550–4563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Macario AJ, Grippo TM, Conway de Macario E. Genetic disorders involving molecular-chaperone genes: a perspective. Genet Med 2005; 7: 3–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hartl FU, Neupert W. Protein sorting to mitochondria: evolutionary conservations of folding and assembly. Science 1990; 247: 930–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cilleros-Holgado P, Gómez-Fernández D, Piñero-Pérez R, et al. Mitochondrial quality control via mitochondrial unfolded protein response (mtUPR) in ageing and neurodegenerative diseases. Biomolecules 2023; 13: 1789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Melber A, Haynes CM. UPR(mt) regulation and output: a stress response mediated by mitochondrial-nuclear communication. Cell Res 2018; 28: 281–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martinus RD, Garth GP, Webster TL, et al. Selective induction of mitochondrial chaperones in response to loss of the mitochondrial genome. Eur J Biochem 1996; 240: 98–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Haynes CM, Yang Y, Blais SP, et al. The matrix peptide exporter HAF-1 signals a mitochondrial UPR by activating the transcription factor ZC376.7 in C. elegans. Mol Cell 2010; 37: 529–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nargund AM, Pellegrino MW, Fiorese CJ, et al. Mitochondrial import efficiency of ATFS-1 regulates mitochondrial UPR activation. Science 2012; 337: 587–590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haynes CM, Petrova K, Benedetti C, et al. ClpP mediates activation of a mitochondrial unfolded protein response in C. elegans. Dev Cell 2007; 13: 467–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nargund AM, Fiorese CJ, Pellegrino MW, et al. Mitochondrial and nuclear accumulation of the transcription factor ATFS-1 promotes OXPHOS recovery during the UPR(mt). Mol Cell 2015; 58: 123–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alim I, Caulfield JT, Chen Y, et al. Selenium drives a transcriptional adaptive program to block ferroptosis and treat stroke. Cell 2019; 177: 1262–1279 e1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fiorese CJ, Schulz AM, Lin YF, et al. The transcription factor ATF5 mediates a mammalian mitochondrial UPR. Curr Biol 2016; 26: 2037–2043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Quiros PM, Prado MA, Zamboni N, et al. Multi-omics analysis identifies ATF4 as a key regulator of the mitochondrial stress response in mammals. J Cell Biol 2017; 216: 2027–2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Teske BF, Fusakio ME, Zhou D, et al. CHOP induces activating transcription factor 5 (ATF5) to trigger apoptosis in response to perturbations in protein homeostasis. Mol Biol Cell 2013; 24: 2477–2490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang W, Paschen W. Unfolded protein response in brain ischemia: a timely update. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016; 36: 2044–2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Paschen W, Proud CG, Mies G. Shut-down of translation, a global neuronal stress response: mechanisms and pathological relevance. Curr Pharm Des 2007; 13: 1887–1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Costa-Mattioli M, Walter P. The integrated stress response: from mechanism to disease. Science 2020; 368: eaat5314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jousse C, Bruhat A, Carraro V, et al. Inhibition of CHOP translation by a peptide encoded by an open reading frame localized in the chop 5’UTR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29: 4341–4351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Harding HP, Novoa I, Zhang Y, et al. Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 1099–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li T, Zhao H, Guo G, et al. VMP1 affects endoplasmic reticulum stress sensitivity via differential modulation of the three unfolded protein response arms. Cell Rep 2023; 42: 112209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hetz C, Chevet E, Oakes SA. Proteostasis control by the unfolded protein response. Nat Cell Biol 2015; 17: 829–838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hetz C, Zhang K, Kaufman RJ. Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020; 21: 421–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu S, Liu H, Wang C, et al. Dual roles of UPR(er) and UPR(mt) in neurodegenerative diseases. J Mol Med (Berl) 2023; 101: 1499–1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Inigo JR, Chandra D. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR(mt)): shielding against toxicity to mitochondria in cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2022; 15: 98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yan J, Sun CL, Shin S, et al. Effect of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response on hypoxic death and mitochondrial protein aggregation. Cell Death Dis 2021; 12: 711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smyrnias I, Gray SP, Okonko DO, et al. Cardioprotective effect of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response during chronic pressure overload. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73: 1795–1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Uoselis L, Lindblom R, Lam WK, et al. Temporal landscape of mitochondrial proteostasis governed by the UPR(mt). Sci Adv 2023; 9: eadh8228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oren YS, McClure ML, Rowe SM, et al. The unfolded protein response affects readthrough of premature termination codons. EMBO Mol Med 2014; 6: 685–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen K, Ma Y, Liu X, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals characteristics in tumor microenvironment of PDAC with MSI-H following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anti-PD-1 therapy. Cancer Lett 2023; 576: 216421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen K, Ma Y, Zhong X, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of primary tumors and paired organoids of pancreatobiliary cancer. Cancer Lett 2024; 582: 216586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bartoszewski R, Gebert M, Janaszak-Jasiecka A, et al. Genome-wide mRNA profiling identifies RCAN1 and GADD45A as regulators of the transitional switch from survival to apoptosis during ER stress. FEBS J 2020; 287: 2923–2947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 2019; 177: 1888–1902 e1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Longo SK, Guo MG, Ji AL, et al. Integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomics to elucidate intercellular tissue dynamics. Nat Rev Genet 2021; 22: 627–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Haeussler S, Conradt B. Methods to study the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR(mt)) in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2378: 249–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang Q, Wang Z, Zhang W, et al. The memory of neuronal mitochondrial stress is inherited transgenerationally via elevated mitochondrial DNA levels. Nat Cell Biol 2021; 23: 870–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Durieux J, Wolff S, Dillin A. The cell-non-autonomous nature of electron transport chain-mediated longevity. Cell 2011; 144: 79–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pharaoh G, Pulliam D, Hill S, et al. Ablation of the mitochondrial complex IV assembly protein Surf1 leads to increased expression of the UPR(MT) and increased resistance to oxidative stress in primary cultures of fibroblasts. Redox Biol 2016; 8: 430–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li TY, Sleiman MB, Li H, et al. The transcriptional coactivator CBP/p300 is an evolutionarily conserved node that promotes longevity in response to mitochondrial stress. Nat Aging 2021; 1: 165–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sural S, Lu TC, Jung SA, et al. HSB-1 inhibition and HSF-1 overexpression trigger overlapping transcriptional changes to promote longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. G3 (Bethesda) 2019; 9: 1679–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sural S, Liang CY, Wang FY, et al. HSB-1/HSF-1 pathway modulates histone H4 in mitochondria to control mtDNA transcription and longevity. Sci Adv 2020; 6: eaaz4452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mouchiroud L, Houtkooper RH, Moullan N, et al. The NAD(+)/sirtuin pathway modulates longevity through activation of mitochondrial UPR and FOXO signaling. Cell 2013; 154: 430–441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhu L, Zhou Q, He L, et al. Mitochondrial unfolded protein response: an emerging pathway in human diseases. Free Radic Biol Med 2021; 163: 125–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Molenaars M, Janssens GE, Williams EG, et al. A conserved Mito-Cytosolic translational balance links two longevity pathways. Cell Metab 2020; 31: 549–563 e547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Benigni A, Cassis P, Conti S, et al. Sirt3 deficiency shortens life span and impairs cardiac mitochondrial function rescued by Opa1 gene transfer. Antioxid Redox Signal 2019; 31: 1255–1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Papa L, Germain D. SirT3 regulates the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. Mol Cell Biol 2014; 34: 699–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang H, Ryu D, Wu Y, et al. NAD(+) repletion improves mitochondrial and stem cell function and enhances life span in mice. Science 2016; 352: 1436–1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mohrin M, Shin J, Liu Y, et al. Stem cell aging. A mitochondrial UPR-mediated metabolic checkpoint regulates hematopoietic stem cell aging. Science 2015; 347: 1374–1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang CL, Ohkubo R, Mu WC, et al. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response regulates hippocampal neural stem cell aging. Cell Metab 2023; 35: 996–1008 e1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Berger E, Rath E, Yuan D, et al. Mitochondrial function controls intestinal epithelial stemness and proliferation. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 13171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Song M, Franco A, Fleischer JA, et al. Abrogating mitochondrial dynamics in mouse hearts accelerates mitochondrial senescence. Cell Metab 2017; 26: 872–883 e875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hart CR, Ryan ZC, Pfaffenbach KT, et al. Attenuated activation of the unfolded protein response following exercise in skeletal muscle of older adults. Aging (Albany NY) 2019; 11: 7587–7604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Karpel-Massler G, Horst BA, Shu C, et al. A synthetic cell-penetrating dominant-negative ATF5 peptide exerts anticancer activity against a broad spectrum of treatment-resistant cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22: 4698–4711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lin YF, Haynes CM. Metabolism and the UPR(mt). Mol Cell 2016; 61: 677–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ellenberger TE, Brandl CJ, Struhl K, et al. The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted alpha helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. Cell 1992; 71: 1223–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Feldheim J, Kessler AF, Schmitt D, et al. Expression of activating transcription factor 5 (ATF5) is increased in astrocytomas of different WHO grades and correlates with survival of glioblastoma patients. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11: 8673–8684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sheng Z, Li L, Zhu LJ, et al. A genome-wide RNA interference screen reveals an essential CREB3L2-ATF5-MCL1 survival pathway in malignant glioma with therapeutic implications. Nat Med 2010; 16: 671–677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Liu DX, Qian D, Wang B, et al. p300-Dependent ATF5 acetylation is essential for egr-1 gene activation and cell proliferation and survival. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31: 3906–3916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dluzen D, Li G, Tacelosky D, et al. BCL-2 is a downstream target of ATF5 that mediates the prosurvival function of ATF5 in a cell type-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 7705–7713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sun X, Jefferson P, Zhou Q, et al. Dominant-Negative ATF5 compromises cancer cell survival by targeting CEBPB and CEBPD. Mol Cancer Res 2020; 18: 216–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Xia X, Liao Y, Huang C, et al. Deubiquitination and stabilization of estrogen receptor alpha by ubiquitin-specific protease 7 promotes breast tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett 2019; 465: 118–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Huang B, Omoto Y, Iwase H, et al. Differential expression of estrogen receptor alpha, beta1, and beta2 in lobular and ductal breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111: 1933–1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Jiang HL, Sun HF, Gao SP, et al. SSBP1 suppresses TGFbeta-Driven epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in Triple-Negative breast cancer by regulating mitochondrial retrograde signaling. Cancer Res 2016; 76: 952–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chen F, Fan Y, Cao P, et al. Pan-Cancer analysis of the prognostic and immunological role of HSF1: a potential target for survival and immunotherapy. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2021; 2021: 5551036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tang H, Li J, Liu X, et al. Down-regulation of HSP60 suppresses the proliferation of glioblastoma cells via the ROS/AMPK/mTOR pathway. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 28388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ghosh JC, Siegelin MD, Dohi T, et al. Heat shock protein 60 regulation of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in tumor cells. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 8988–8993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Starenki D, Hong SK, Lloyd RV, et al. Mortalin (GRP75/HSPA9) upregulation promotes survival and proliferation of medullary thyroid carcinoma cells. Oncogene 2015; 34: 4624–4634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hu Y, Yang L, Yang Y, et al. Oncogenic role of mortalin contributes to ovarian tumorigenesis by activating the MAPK-ERK pathway. J Cell Mol Med 2016; 20: 2111–2121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Liu LX, Lu JC, Zeng HY, et al. Mortalin stabilizes CD151-depedent tetraspanin-enriched microdomains and implicates in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer 2019; 10: 6199–6206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Nagumo Y, Kakeya H, Yamaguchi J, et al. Structure-activity relationships of epolactaene derivatives: str?show $146#?>uctural requirements for inhibition of Hsp60 chaperone activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2004; 14: 4425–4429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hu D, Liu Y, Lai YT, et al. Anticancer gold(III) porphyrins target mitochondrial chaperone Hsp60. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2016; 55: 1387–1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ray AM, Salim N, Stevens M, et al. Exploiting the HSP60/10 chaperonin system as a chemotherapeutic target for colorectal cancer. Bioorg Med Chem 2021; 40: 116129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Propper DJ, Braybrooke JP, Taylor DJ, et al. Phase I trial of the selective mitochondrial toxin MKT077 in chemo-resistant solid tumours. Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 923–927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Shao H, Li X, Moses MA, et al. Exploration of benzothiazole rhodacyanines as allosteric inhibitors of protein-protein interactions with heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70). J Med Chem 2018; 61: 6163–6177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bezawork-Geleta A, Brodie EJ, Dougan DA, et al. LON is the master protease that protects against protein aggregation in human mitochondria through direct degradation of misfolded proteins. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 17397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Quiros PM, Espanol Y, Acin-Perez R, et al. ATP-dependent lon protease controls tumor bioenergetics by reprogramming mitochondrial activity. Cell Rep 2014; 8: 542–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ghosh JC, Seo JH, Agarwal E, et al. Akt phosphorylation of mitochondrial Lonp1 protease enables oxidative metabolism and advanced tumor traits. Oncogene 2019; 38: 6926–6939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Liu C, Wang H, Li H, et al. Inhibition of LONP1 suppresses pancreatic cancer progression via c-jun N-Terminal kinase pathway-meditated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Pancreas 2019; 48: 629–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gibellini L, Losi L, De Biasi S, et al. LonP1 differently modulates mitochondrial function and bioenergetics of primary versus metastatic colon cancer cells. Front Oncol 2018; 8: 254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Borella R, Forti L, Gibellini L, et al. Synthesis and a?show $146#?>nticancer activity of CDDO and CDDO-Me, two derivatives of natural triterpenoids. Molecules 2019; 24: 4097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wang J, Hartling JA, Flanagan JM. The structure of ClpP at 2.3 a resolution suggests a model for ATP-dependent proteolysis. Cell 1997; 91: 447–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Cole A, Wang Z, Coyaud E, et al. Inhibition of the mitochondrial protease ClpP as a therapeutic strategy for human acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2015; 27: 864–876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Luo J, Zeng B, Tao C, et al. ClpP regulates breast cancer cell proliferation, invasion and apoptosis by modulating the src/PI3K/akt signaling pathway. PeerJ 2020; 8: e8754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Seo JH, Rivadeneira DB, Caino MC, et al. The mitochondrial unfoldase-peptidase complex ClpXP controls bioenergetics stress and metastasis. PLoS Biol 2016; 14: e1002507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Zhang Y, Maurizi MR. Mitochondrial ClpP activity is required for cisplatin resistance in human cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016; 1862: 252–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Venneti S, Kawakibi AR, Ji S, et al. Clinical efficacy of ONC201 in H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline gliomas is driven by disruption of integrated metabolic and epigenetic pathways. Cancer Discov 2023; 13: 2370–2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Yan J, Jiang J, He L, et al. Mitochondrial superoxide/hydrogen peroxide: an emerging therapeutic target for metabolic diseases. Free Radic Biol Med 2020; 152: 33–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Tang M, Huang Z, Luo X, et al. Ferritinophagy activation and sideroflexin1-dependent mitochondria iron overload is involved in apelin-13-induced cardiomyocytes hypertrophy. Free Radic Biol Med 2019; 134: 445–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Busche MA, Hyman BT. Synergy between amyloid-beta and tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci 2020; 23: 1183–1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Posar A, Visconti P. Cognitive deterioration in childhood: Never forget electrical status epilepticus during slow-wave sleep. Brain Circ 2023; 9: 48–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wan YW, Al-Ouran R, Mangleburg CG, et al. Meta-Analysis of the alzheimer’s disease human brain transcriptome and functional dissection in mouse models. Cell Rep 2020; 32: 107908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Yuan SH, Hiramatsu N, Liu Q, et al. Tauopathy-associated PERK alleles are functional hypomorphs that increase neuronal vulnerability to ER stress. Hum Mol Genet 2018; 27: 3951–3963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.He L, Loika Y, Park Y, et al. Exome-wide age-of-onset analysis reveals exonic variants in ERN1 and SPPL2C associated with alzheimer’s disease. Transl Psychiatry 2021; 11: 146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Poirier Y, Grimm A, Schmitt K, et al. Link between the unfolded protein response and dysregulation of mitochondrial bioenergetics in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2019; 76: 1419–1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Cisse M, Duplan E, Lorivel T, et al. The transcription factor XBP1s restores hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory by control of the kalirin-7 pathway in Alzheimer model. Mol Psychiatry 2017; 22: 1562–1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Duran-Aniotz C, Poblete N, Rivera-Krstulovic C, et al. The unfolded protein response transcription factor XBP1s ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease by improving synaptic function and proteostasis. Mol Ther 2023; 31: 2240–2256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Beck JS, Mufson EJ, Counts SE. Evidence for mitochondrial UPR gene activation in familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2016; 13: 610–614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Thakkar N, Martis PB, Kutikuppala LVS, et al. Lecanemab: a hope in the management of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Circ 2023; 9: 194–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Sorrentino V, Romani M, Mouchiroud L, et al. Enhancing mitochondrial proteostasis reduces amyloid-beta proteotoxicity. Nature 2017; 552: 187–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Shen Y, Ding M, Xie Z, et al. Activation of mitochondrial unfolded protein response in SHSY5Y expressing APP cells and APP/PS1 mice. Front Cell Neurosci 2019; 13: 568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Perez MJ, Ivanyuk D, Panagiotakopoulou V, et al. Loss of function of the mitochondrial peptidase PITRM1 induces proteotoxic stress and alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in human cerebral organoids. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26: 5733–5750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hou M, Bao W, Gao Y, et al. Honokiol improves cognitive impairment in APP/PS1 mice through activating mitophagy and mitochondrial unfolded protein response. Chem Biol Interact 2022; 351: 109741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Sterky FH, Lee S, Wibom R, et al. Impaired mitochondrial transport and parkin-independent degeneration of respiratory chain-deficient dopamine neurons in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108: 12937–12942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Damiano M, Gautier CA, Bulteau AL, et al. Tissue- and cell-specific mitochondrial defect in parkin-deficient mice. PLoS One 2014; 9: e99898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Moisoi N, Fedele V, Edwards J, et al. Loss of PINK1 enhances neurodegeneration in a mouse model of parkinson’s disease triggered by mitochondrial stress. Neuropharmacology 2014; 77: 350–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Burbulla LF, Fitzgerald JC, Stegen K, et al. Mitochondrial proteolytic stress induced by loss of mortalin function is rescued by parkin and PINK1. Cell Death Dis 2014; 5: e1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Smajic S, Prada-Medina CA, Landoulsi Z, et al. Single-cell sequencing of human midbrain reveals glial activation and a Parkinson-specific neuronal state. Brain 2022; 145: 964–978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Cooper JF, Machiela E, Dues DJ, et al. Activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response promotes longevity and dopamine neuron survival in Parkinson’s disease models. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 16441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hu D, Liu Z, Qi X. UPR(mt) activation protects against MPP(+)-induced toxicity in a cell culture model of Parkinson’s disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2021; 569: 17–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Liu M, Yu S, Wang J, et al. Ginseng protein protects against mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration by inducing mitochondrial unfolded protein response in Drosophila melanogaster PINK1 model of Parkinson’s disease. J Ethnopharmacol 2020; 247: 112213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Chang CH, Chang ST, Liao VH. Potential anti-Parkinsonian’s effect of S-(+)-linalool from cinnamomum osmophloeum ct. linalool leaves are associated with mitochondrial regulation via gas-1, nuo-1, and mev-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Phytother Res 2022; 36: 3325–3334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Landles C, Bates GP. Huntingtin and the molecular pathogenesis of Huntington’s disease. Fourth in molecular medicine review series. EMBO Rep 2004; 5: 958–963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Costa V, Scorrano L. Shaping the role of mitochondria in the pathogenesis of Huntington’s disease. EMBO J 2012; 31: 1853–1864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on huntington’s disease chromosomes. The huntington’s disease collaborative research group. Cell 1993; 72: 971–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Almeida LM, Oliveira A, Oliveira JMA, et al. Stress response mechanisms in protein misfolding diseases: Profiling a cellular model of huntington’s disease. Arch Biochem Biophys 2023; 745: 109711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Garay RS, Solitro GF, Lam KC, et al. Characterization of regional variation of bone mineral density in the geriatric human cervical spine by quantitative computed tomography. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0271187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 2006; 314: 130–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Lee EB, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ. Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011; 13: 38–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Gao FB, Almeida S, Lopez-Gonzalez R. Dysregulated molecular pathways in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorder. EMBO J 2017; 36: 2931–2950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Zubair AS, Saab L, Scharer K, et al. Patients’ experiences with methylcobalamin injections in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Circ 2024; 10: 60–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.P, Campos RM, Postigo Mota S, Munoz Bermejo L, et al. [Burns: nursing care]. Rev Enferm 2010; 33: 59–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Panconesi R, Widmer J, Carvalho MF, et al. Mitochondria and ischemia reperfusion injury. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27: 434–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Wu MY, Yiang GT, Liao WT, et al. Current mechanistic concepts in ischemia and reperfusion injury. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018; 46: 1650–1667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Xu Y, Wang Y, Ji X. Immune and inflammatory mechanism of remote ischemic conditioning: a narrative review. Brain Circ 2023; 9: 77–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Panickar KS, Anderson RA. Effect of polyphenols on oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in neuronal death and brain edema in cerebral ischemia. Int J Mol Sci 2011; 12: 8181–8207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Rutkai I, Merdzo I, Wunnava SV, et al. Cerebrovascular function and mitochondrial bioenergetics after ischemia-reperfusion in male rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019; 39: 1056–1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Shu L, Chen B, Chen B, et al. Brain ischemic insult induces cofilin rod formation leading to synaptic dysfunction in neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019; 39: 2181–2195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Forte M, Schirone L, Ameri P, Italian Society of Cardiology Working group on Cellular and Molecular Biology of the Heart et al. The role of mitochondrial dynamics in cardiovascular diseases. Br J Pharmacol 2021; 178: 2060–2076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ji H, Wang J, Muid D, et al. FUNDC1 activates the mitochondrial unfolded protein response to preserve mitochondrial quality control in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cell Signal 2022; 92: 110249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.An H, Zhou B, Hayakawa K, et al. ATF5-mediated mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR(mt)) protects neurons against Oxygen-Glucose deprivation and cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2024; 55: 1904–1913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Xu M, Xue RQ, Lu Y, et al. Choline ameliorates cardiac hypertrophy by regulating metabolic remodelling and UPRmt through SIRT3-AMPK pathway. Cardiovasc Res 2019; 115: 530–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Xiaowei X, Qian X, Dingzhou Z. Sirtuin-3 activates the mitochondrial unfolded protein response and reduces cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int J Biol Sci 2023; 19: 4327–4339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Gao AW, El Alam G, Lalou A, et al. Multi-omics analysis identifies essential regulators of mitochondrial stress response in two wild-type C. elegans strains. iScience 2022; 25: 103734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Zhu Y, Jen A, Overmyer KA, et al. Mass spectrometry-based multi-omics integration with a single set of C. elegans samples. Anal Chem 2023; 95: 10930–10938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.He J, Zhang Y, Guo Y, et al. Blood-derived factors to brain communication in brain diseases. Sci Bull (Beijing) 2024; 69: 3618–3632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Zhang S, Guo H, Wang H, et al. A novel mitochondrial unfolded protein response-related risk signature to predict prognosis, immunotherapy and sorafenib sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Apoptosis 2024; 29: 768–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ropitaux M, Hays Q, Baron A, et al. Dynamic imaging of cell wall polysaccharides by metabolic click-mediated labeling of pectins in living elongating cells. Plant J 2022; 110: 916–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Beliveau BJ, Boettiger AN, Avendano MS, et al. Single-molecule super-resolution imaging of chromosomes and in situ haplotype visualization using oligopaint FISH probes. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 7147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Honda M, Itoh H, Suzuki T, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of higher-dose mizoribine in healthy male volunteers. Biol Pharm Bull 2006; 29: 2460–2464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



