Abstract
Background:
Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from preexisting ones via capillary sprouting, is a crucial process in tumor growth and metastasis. As a tumor’s angiogenic capacity increases, its microvasculature, measured by micro vessel density (MVD), also increases. This study aims to evaluate the expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and CD34 in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma through immunohistochemical methods.
Methods:
The study analyzed a total of 40 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. These included 10 cases of normal buccal mucosa, 15 cases of oral epithelial dysplasia, and 15 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using monoclonal anti-VEGF and anti-CD34 antibodies. The intensity and area of staining for VEGF were assessed, and the mean MVD was calculated. Statistical analysis was conducted using Pearson’s chi-square test and one-way ANOVA.
Results:
The expression of VEGF and MVD (indicated by CD34 staining) were significantly higher in oral squamous cell carcinoma compared to oral epithelial dysplasia and normal buccal mucosa.
Conclusion:
As tumors grow, angiogenesis increases proportionally with tumor volume and disease progression, contributing to tumorigenesis. VEGF serves as a critical mitogen for tumor vascularization, and MVD can be a useful indicator of disease progression.
Key Words: Angiogenesis, Micro vessel density, Growth Factor, Carcinogenesis
Introduction
Oral cancer, specifically oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), is the most prevalent head and neck cancer globally. It is marked by varying levels of dysplastic changes in the oral epithelium and invasion into the underlying connective tissue. The primary risk factors for developing OSCC include the use of tobacco in smoke or quid form. The mutagenic impact of these factors is dose-dependent, with increased frequency and duration of use accelerating and worsening the condition. Notably, the incidence and prevalence of OSCC is rising among younger adults. This type of cancer develops within a field of pre-cancerous epithelium, either from an existing potentially malignant disorder or spontaneously [1].
Tumors require blood supply for their growth and angiogenesis is one of the factors assisting tumor growth. Angio-genesis, a term introduced by Hertwig in 1935 to describe the formation of new blood vessels in the placenta, is now used to refer to both physiological and pathological processes. Physiological angiogenesis is controlled during ovulation, embryogenesis, lactation, and wound healing. In contrast, pathological angiogenesis results from disruptions in growth control and is associated with various diseases. Neovascularization, the creation of new blood vessels from existing ones, occurs through a process called capillary sprouting [2].Angiogenesis is a regulatory process controlled by the intricate balance between molecules that promote and inhibit the formation of new blood vessels. This balance is between the stimulatory and inhibitory signals for blood vessel growth [3]. Proangiogenic molecules are diverse group of molecules which includes thrombin, fibrinogen, thymosin beta 4 and various other growth factors, in which the most important growth factor is VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor). Angiogenesis has an important correlation with malignancy. It is widely understood that the angiogenic switch remains ‘off’ when there is a balance between proangiogenic and antiangiogenic molecules. The switch turns ‘on’ when this balance is disrupted, favoring angiogenesis [4].
VEGF is a potent angiogenic cytokine involved in the development of blood supply. VEGF directly affects the vascular endothelial cells which in turn encourage the proliferation of endothelial cells and helps in chemotaxis of macrophages and granulocytes. VEGF promotes angiogenesis by increasing vascular permeability and causing the leakage of proteins such as fibrinogen and together induces various responses to endothelial cells like proliferation, migration and differentiation. The upregulation of VEGF gene has been found to be induced by factors like oxygen tension and the presence of major growth factors like angiogenin, EGF, TGF-α,β, PDGF, interleukins, chemokines and angiopoietins [5].
Measurement of angiogenesis cannot be assessed directly. Quantification of microvasculature is done by assessing the microvessel density (MVD), a marker representing the effect of angiogenesis. MVD acts as a useful prognostic marker and as an indicator of vascular function. MVD is calculated using endothelial marker CD34, cluster of differentiation of human hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen with transmembrane surface glycoprotein and functions as a cell – cell adhesion factor. It is expressed on endothelial cell of newly formed vessels that are trapped within tumor tissues. Tumor with increased vascular density is associated with increased metastatic potential and decreased survival [6].
As the tumor angiogenic capacity grows, its microvasculature is indicated by an increase in microvessel density. Based on the literature evidence this study is intended to evaluate immunohistochemical expression of VEGF and CD34 in oral epithelial dysplasia and OSCC, providing evidence for a strong relationship between angiogenesis and OSCC. The current treatment modalities for OSCC are based upon the clinical staging and histopathological gradings of the disease. This study helps us to evaluate disease progression and contribute to the development of novel antiangiogenic drugs for cancer prevention and treatment, serving as an adjunct to existing treatment methods.
Materials and Methods
The study examined formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from the Department of Oral Pathology at Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital in Melmaruvathur as well as private hospitals. The sample consisted of fifteen cases of histologically confirmed epithelial dysplasia: five mild, five moderate, and five severe. Moreover, there were 15 cases of histologically confirmed OSCC: 5 well-differentiated, 5 moderately differentiated and 5 poorly differentiated. For control group there were ten samples of normal buccal mucosa that were obtained from adjacent sites during the surgical removal of impacted third molars
Two subsequent sections, each 3μ thickness were cut for each case, from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues of histologically diagnosed as oral epithelial dysplasia and OSCC. These sections were treated with the immunohistochemcical reagent anti-VEGF antibody and anti-CD34 antibody.
Antibody Used
1. Primary antibody
(a) Anti-VEGF-VG-1Mouse Monoclocal Antibody
(b) Anti- CD34-Q bend10 Mouse Monoclonal Antibody
2. Secondary antibody KIT Polyexcel HRP/DAB detection system
Positive controls include human kidney of the test for anti-VEGF antibody and human tonsil of the test for anti-CD34 antibody was treated in the same manner as the test groups. Negative control includes section of epithelial dysplasia and OSCC from the samples was treated in the same manner as the test groups except that the primary antibody anti–VEGF & anti–CD34 was omitted.
Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis is by using anti-VEGF antibody.
Using light microscope, intensity of staining VEGF expression are scored as:
• No stain – Score 0
• Mild staining – Score 1
• Moderate staining – Score 2
• Intense staining – Score 3
Using light microscope, area of staining VEGF expression is scored as:
Score 0 - No stained cells in any microscopic field.
Score 1 - Less than 25% of the stained cells are positive.
Score 2 - Between 25% and 50% of the stained cells are positive.
Score 3 - Between 50% and 75% of the stained cells are positive.
Score 4 - More than 75% of the stained cells are positive.
Evaluation of neoangiogenesis (microvessel density) is by using anti-CD34 antibody
According to the criteria outlined by Weidner et al., any brown-stained endothelial cell or cell cluster distinctly separated from adjacent cells is counted as a single microvessel when evaluating MVD. Select three microscopic fields with highest vessel density area in low power magnification and the area is called as hot spots. Individual microvessel densities are counted manually at 40X magnification in three selected hot spots.
Results
Comparison of area of staining of VEGF between normal buccal mucosa, oral epithelial dysplasia, OSCC
In our research study involving different oral tissue types, the expression of VEGF was evaluated through immunostaining. Here are the key findings:
1. Normal Buccal Mucosa (n=10)
Positive VEGF expression: 2 cases (scored as 1 for <25% stained cells).
No VEGF expression: 8 cases
2. Oral Epithelial Dysplasia (n=15)
Positive VEGF expression: 10 cases.
No VEGF expression: 5 cases.
3. OSCC (n=15)
Positive VEGF expression: all 15 cases.
The study did not find any cases with greater than 75% stained cells, so scores of 4 were not used. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Pearson chi-square test.
Comparison of Microvessel Density (CD34) with respect to normal buccal mucosa, oral epithelial dysplasia and OSCC
Normal buccal mucosa shows an average mean value of 4.9 with 10 cases.
Oral epithelial dysplasia shows an average mean value of 8.8 with 15 cases
OSCC shows an average mean value of 15.5 with 15 cases.
Statistical analysis was conducted using the one-way ANOVA
Discussion
OSCC is an aggressive epithelial neoplasm. Dysplasia is the term used for histopathologic diagnosis of premalignant disorders and is recognized as a precursor for the development of OSCC. Awareness of these epithelial dysplastic lesions is crucial as they undergo clinical and histopathological changes before being diagnosed as OSCC. The clinical staging of OSCC is the important prognostic factor upon diagnosis. Despite early detection, intervention and treatment the overall survival rate still remains low
This study helps us to assess disease progression and aid in developing new antiangiogenic drugs for preventing and treating cancer alongside existing therapies. Angiogenesis is a pivotal mechanism in the pathophysiology of OSCC, driving the formation of new blood vessels that hallmark tumour growth and metastasis. VEGF is a primary factor responsible for initiating angiogenesis [7].
VEGF also known as vascular permeability factor is key regulator in tumor induced neo-angiogenesis. VEGF serves as an angiogenic cytokine found within tumor cells. Its expression is widespread across both solid tumors and hematological malignancies in humans. Elevated VEGF levels often correlate with disease progression and survival rates, and in certain carcinomas, VEGF can independently predict prognosis [8].
In the majority of VEGF literature, research has focused on correlating OSCC clinicopathologically with factors such as lymph node metastasis and prognosis. Fewer studies have explored VEGF’s role across various grades of oral epithelial dysplasia and different stages of OSCC. The current study addresses this gap by evaluating VEGF staining intensity in both grades of oral epithelial dysplasia and stages of OSCC.
In this study, the immunohistochemical analysis of VEGF expression demonstrated a marked difference in staining intensity among normal mucosa, oral epithelial dysplasia and OSCC. Positive VEGF expression was observed in only 2 cases of normal buccal mucosa, 10 cases of oral epithelial dysplasia and all 15 cases of OSCC (Figure1A&1B). These findings suggest a significant upregulation of VEGF in OSCC compared to oral epithelial dysplasia and normal buccal mucosa, with a p-value of 0.0. Increased VEGF expression in carcinomas typically correlates with enhanced angiogenesis and poorer prognosis.
Figure 1.
A) VEGF Expression Showing Moderate Staining in Epithelial Dysplasia (40X magnification) B) VEGF Expression Showing Intense Staining in SCC (40X magnification)
In normal healthy buccal mucosa, usually neovascularization is absent. The present study shows mild intensity of expression of VEGF, attributed to the presence of mild inflammation due to samples from the impacted third molar region in few cases. The results obtained coincides with the findings of NakisaTorabinia et al. [9] and SujathaVarma et al. [10] and Astekaret al. [11] showing the significant findings suggest that angiogenesis increases with disease progression and VEGF is an initiation factor for angiogenesis which has a direct relationship with tumorigenesis.
Tumor growth is facilitated through tumor angiogenesis, where cell proliferation exceeds apoptosis. This phenomenon suggests that increased vascular response reduces tumor cell apoptosis, while tumor cell proliferation remains steady, thereby promoting net tumor growth. The process of angiogenesis, driven by both tumor and host cells, is influenced by the balance between positive and negative angiogenic factors.
Recent studies have assessed microvessel density using various endothelial markers, including VEGF, CD105, CD31, CD34, and von Willebrand factor [12]. Among these CD105, CD34, and vWF are capable of staining small, large, and newly formed blood vessels. In contrast, CD31 primarily stains large vessels and sometimes tumor cells, while CD105 does not stain mature blood vessels. vWF can also stain lymphatic vessels. Considering the limitations of other markers, CD34 was selected as the marker for evaluating microvessel density in this study [13].
In this study, the mean value of MVD was assessed in various histological grades of oral epithelial dysplasia and OSCC. The immunohistochemical expression of CD34 was positive in all 15 cases of OSCC (Figure 2A), 14 cases of oral epithelial dysplasia (Figure 2B), and all 10 cases of normal buccal mucosa. These results demonstrate a significant increase in the mean MVD value from normal buccal mucosa to oral epithelial dysplasia and then to OSCC, with a p-value of 0.001.
Figure 2.
A) Expression of CD34 in Epithelial Dysplasia (40X magnification) B) Expression of CD34 in OSCC (40X Magnification)
Comparable findings have been documented in research conducted by Mohtasham N. et al., Mahusudhan Astekar et al. [11], and Hedge Veda et al. [14]. These results suggest that the total number of microvessels increases concomitantly with tumor progression, and MVD remains consistent throughout tumorigenesis. CD34 on the other hand has been a reliable way of measuring tumor vascularity. Consequently, identifying markers such as CD34 is important in predicting metastatic behavior of early-stage tumors [15].
As tumors progress, angiogenesis increases in parallel with tumor volume, sustaining tumorigenesis. VEGF serves as a crucial mitogen facilitating tumor vascularization, and MVD serves as an indicator of disease progression. Further research is warranted to identify VEGF isoforms in tissues, enhancing our understanding of its role. Additionally, current endothelial markers face challenges in distinguishing between active and resting endothelial cells in microvessel density assessment. Thus, there is a need to discover new endothelial markers specific to active neoangiogenic vessels.
Author Contribution Statement
All authors contributed equally in this study.
Acknowledgements
We thank Adhiparasakthi dental college and Hospital for their generous support rendered throughout the study. This study is original research conducted for master thesis and submitted to Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University.
Ethical Declaration
This study was approved by Institutional ethics committee and Review Board, Adhiparasakthi Dental college and Hospital under the reference number 2014MD-Br VI-13.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- 1.Bugshan A, Farooq I. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: metastasis, potentially associated malignant disorders, etiology and recent advancements in diagnosis. F1000Res. 2020;9:229. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22941.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hasina R, Lingen MW. Angiogenesis in oral cancer. J Dent Educ. 2001;65(11):1282–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hoeben A, Landuyt B, Highley MS, Wildiers H, Van Oosterom AT, De Bruijn EA. Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56(4):549–80. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.4.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kapoor P, Deshmukh R. VEGF: A critical driver for angiogenesis and subsequent tumor growth: An IHC study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2012;16(3):330–7. doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.102478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ribatti D. The crucial role of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor in angiogenesis: a historical review. Br J Haematol. 2005;128(3):303–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05291.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi Q, VandeBerg JL. Experimental approaches to derive CD34+ progenitors from human and nonhuman primate embryonic stem cells. Am J Stem Cells. 2015;4(1):32–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carla C, Daris F, Cecilia B, Francesca B, Francesca C, Paolo F. Angiogenesis in head and neck cancer: a review of the literature. J Oncol. 2012;2012:358472. doi: 10.1155/2012/358472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Panigrahi R, Jha NK, Hota SK. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in oral squamous cell carcinoma and its correlation with various clinico-pathological parameters. Eur J of Clin Exp Med. 2024;21(1):82 –87. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Torabinia N, Razavi SM, Tahririan D. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Expression in Normal, Dysplastic and Neoplastic Squamous Epithelium of Oral Mucosa. J Pioneer Med Sci. 2014 ;4(3) [Google Scholar]
- 10.Varma S, Shameena PM, Sivasankaran S, Manoj Kumar KP, Varekar AA. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oral Maxillofac Pathol J. 2014;5(1):418 . [Google Scholar]
- 11.Astekar M, Joshi A, Ramesh G, Metgud R. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in oral tumorigenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2012;16(1):22–6. doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.92968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moshref M, Mashhadi-Abbas F, Sargolzaie S, Taghavi N. Evaluation of CD31 expression and mast cell count in dysplastic lesions and squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2010;2010(3):272–6. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shahsavari F, Farhadi S, Sadri D, Sedehi M. Evaluation of Microvascularity by CD34 Expression in Esophagus and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(6):458–62. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hegde V, Marla V. Mast cells and angiogenesis in oral epithelial dysplastic lesions and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2015;4(1):46–52. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Maqsood A, Ali A, Zaffar Z, Mokeem S, Mokeem SS, Ahmed N, et al. Expression of CD34 and α-SMA Markers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Differentiation A Histological and Histo-Chemical Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18(1):192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


