Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 25;15(5):4217–4234. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2300

Table 5. Ablation study of FCFE and MHARF on the BraTS 2020 dataset.

Methods WT TC ET Average
DSC↑ HD95↓ (mm) DSC↑ HD95↓ (mm) DSC↑ HD95↓ (mm) DSC↑ HD95↓ (mm)
Basic 0.915 1.866 0.847 3.018 0.783 2.800 0.848 2.561
Basic + FCFE 0.914 1.910 0.854 2.727 0.782 2.912 0.850 2.516
Basic + MHARF 0.915 1.883 0.848 2.961 0.784 2.756 0.849 2.533
FCFDiff-Net 0.916* 1.917 0.860* 2.571* 0.786* 2.581* 0.854* 2.356*

Higher DSC scores (↑) indicate better segmentation, whereas lower HD95 values (↓) indicate better performance. The top result is marked with asterisk (*). BraTS, brain tumor segmentation; DSC, Dice similarity coefficient; ET, enhancing tumor; FCFE, full-conditional feature embedding; HD95, Hausdorff distance at the 95th percentile; MHARF, multi-head attention residual fusion; TC, tumor core; WT, whole tumor.