Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 25;15(5):4217–4234. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2300

Table 7. Performance of different conditional embedding methods on the BraTS 2020 dataset.

Methods WT TC ET Average
DSC↑ HD95↓ (mm) DSC↑ HD95↓ (mm) DSC↑ HD95↓ (mm) DSC↑ HD95↓ (mm)
Conditional fusion 0.912 3.190 0.840 5.611 0.780 4.014 0.844 4.272
Feature encoder 0.915* 1.866* 0.847 3.018 0.783* 2.800* 0.848 2.561
Conditional embedding 0.910 2.040 0.850 2.816 0.780 2.772 0.847 2.543
FCFDiff-Net 0.914 1.910 0.854* 2.727* 0.782 2.912 0.850* 2.516*

Higher DSC scores (↑) indicate better segmentation, while lower HD95 values (↓) indicate better performance. The top result is marked with asterisk (*). BraTS, brain tumor segmentation; DSC, Dice similarity coefficient; ET, enhancing tumor; FCFDiff-Net, full-conditional feature diffusion embedded network; HD95, Hausdorff distance at the 95th percentile; TC, tumor core; WT, whole tumor.