Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 May 20;184(6):350. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06176-8

Recognizing multiple epiphyseal dysplasia in children presenting with joint pain: a commonly overlooked skeletal dysplasia

Tuğba Daşar 1,2, Gözde İmren 3, Adalet Elçin Yıldız 4, Gizem Ürel Demir 5, Gülen Eda Utine 1,5, Güney Yılmaz 6, Pelin Özlem Şimşek Kiper 1,5,
PMCID: PMC12092524  PMID: 40392407

Abstract

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasias are relatively common skeletal disorders, and diagnosing children can often be challenging due to various presenting complaints, including joint pain, short stature, waddling gait, joint deformities, and myopathy findings. Patients may experience early-onset osteoarthritis, and in some cases, joint replacement therapy may be required. Radiographs are characterized by flat, small, and irregularly shaped epiphyses, especially in the hips and knees. Multiple epiphyseal dysplasias are caused by variants in the genes encoding important cartilage extracellular matrix proteins, enzymes, and transporter proteins, including COMP, MATN3, COL9A1, COL9A2, COL9A3, CANT1, and SLC26A2. We aimed to investigate the clinical, radiographic, and molecular findings, along with the natural course of the disease, in a group of patients with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. The children with a clinical diagnosis of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia and their affected parents registered at our center over a period of 20 years were evaluated. The clinical and radiographic findings were reviewed. The genetic test was performed whenever possible, with the aid of Sanger sequencing or exome sequencing as appropriate. A total of 27 patients (21 children and six affected parents) from 14 unrelated families were clinically diagnosed with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. The genetic etiology could be revealed in 25 patients (n = 25/27, 92.5%) from 12 unrelated families. Of the 25 patients, 16 (64%) were male and nine (36%) were female. The age at genetic diagnosis ranged from 4 to 50 years, with a median age of 10 years. Nine patients (9/25, 36%) had short stature, 17 (17/25, 68%) experienced joint pain, and seven (7/25, 28%) required orthopedic surgery. The most frequent complaints leading to referral were joint pain and difficulty walking. Genetic tests revealed a total of 12 variants in 12 families, among which three were novel: COMP (13/25 patients, 52%; 7/12 families, 58.3%), MATN3 (5/25 patients, 20%; 2/12 families, 16.6%), SLC26A2 (5/25 patients, 20%; 2/12 families, 16.6%), and COL9A2 (2/25 patients, 8%; 1/12 families 8.3%). Of the patients who underwent orthopedic surgery (n = 7), five had COMP variants. Patients with COMP variants exhibited a more severe phenotype, consistent with the literature.

Conclusion: Multiple epiphyseal dysplasias represent a genetically heterogeneous group of disorders that may present clinical and diagnostic challenges. This condition should be considered when evaluating patients who experience joint pain and have radiographic findings suggestive of Perthes disease. A comprehensive skeletal survey and genetic tests are essential for the accurate diagnosis and management of this condition.

What is Known:

MED represents one of the most prevalent categories of skeletal dysplasias, presenting clinically with progressive joint pain, skeletal deformities, gait disturbances, or features suggestive of an underlying myopathy.

What is New:

In this study, we present 25 patients with MED, identify three novel variants, establish significant correlations between genotype and phenotype, and demonstrate how genetic analysis facilitates the differentiation of MED subtypes, thereby offering clearer insights into the genetic foundations and clinical implications of this condition.

Keywords: MED, Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, Skeletal dysplasia, Joint pain

Introduction

The genetic skeletal disorders are individually rare, but collectively rather common, with an approximate incidence of 1 in 5000 [1]. Among them, multiple epiphyseal dysplasias (MEDs) represent a genetically heterogeneous group primarily affecting the epiphysis of long bones, particularly in the hips and knees [24]. According to the Nosology of Genetic Skeletal Disorders 2023 revision, MED is classified within Group 9, “Pseudoachondroplasia and the multiple epiphyseal dysplasias” [5]. To date, seven genes have been demonstrated in the etiology of MED, involving both recessive and dominant inheritance. Monoallelic variants in COMP, COL9A2, COL9A3, COL9A1, and MATN3 have been linked to types 1 (OMIM# 132400), 2 (OMIM# 600204), 3 (OMIM# 600969), 6 (OMIM# 614135), and 5 (OMIM# 607078) MED, respectively. On the other hand, biallelic variants in SLC26A2 are responsible for type 4 MED (OMIM# 226900) [25]. Notably, a recent addition to the classification is a new type of MED (Type 7, OMIM# 617719), identified in two families and associated with biallelic variants in the CANT1 gene [6], which is also implicated in Desbuquois dysplasia. However, it is important to emphasize that patients with MED Type 7 do not display the typical clinical features associated with Desbuquois dysplasia, including characteristic facial dysmorphism, joint dislocations, short extremities, coronal clefts, or accessory ossification centers in the hands, findings commonly observed in individuals with this condition.

The clinical diagnosis of MED may be challenging since the presenting signs are often rheumatological or neurological, such as joint pain, walking difficulty, and myopathy. The disproportionate short stature, which, in general, is a major finding in skeletal dysplasias, is usually not present. Nevertheless, patients with MED may display short stature. Patients usually present with joint pain following physical activity, often manifesting in early childhood along with early-onset osteoarthritis, which frequently necessitates joint replacement. In addition, a waddling gait, limited joint mobility, and joint deformities are also seen [3, 7, 8]. Radiographic examination commonly reveals delayed epiphyseal ossification, as well as small, flat, and deformed epiphyses, particularly in the hips and knees [9]. The most common deformities include genu valgum/varum in the lower extremities, acetabular dysplasia, coxa vara, and epiphyseal irregularities in the femoral head. These deformities may benefit from orthopedic procedures, including pelvic osteotomies, corrective long bone osteotomies, and guided growth (hemiepiphysiodesis) techniques [1013]. In this study, we aimed to review the clinical, radiographic, and molecular findings in a group of patients with MED from a single tertiary centre in Turkiye in order to increase the awareness of this entity among clinicians and orthopedic surgeons.

Methods

The study protocol was approved by the Hacettepe University Ethics Committee (GO 17/321–19) and followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and their legal guardians. The study was supported by the Hacettepe University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit with Project ID TSA-2017–14392.

Patients and samples

Patients with a clinical diagnosis of MED who were under follow-up at Hacettepe University Pediatric Genetics Department were included in the study. The patients were enrolled over a span of 20 years, from January 2004 to January 2025. We collected comprehensive clinical data from 25 patients, including demographics (age, sex), medical history, and presenting symptoms such as joint pain, mobility issues, height discrepancies, difficulty walking, challenges in climbing stairs, muscle weakness, and leg deformities. Physical examination findings were documented, including joint range of motion and short stature, along with any surgical history related to joint or skeletal interventions. Radiographic data were obtained through standard anteroposterior and lateral X-ray views of affected joints (hands, feet, hips, knees, ankles), assessing characteristic findings such as delayed ossification of epiphyses, irregular contours of carpal and tarsal bones, flat or rounded epiphyses, irregularities in the epiphyses, the presence of a “glacier crevice” sign or “harlequin hat” appearance at the knees, changes in bone age compared to chronological age, and evaluation for coxa deformities and genu deformities.

Molecular analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood sample of the patients and their parents using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen Valencia, CA). Firstly, Sanger sequencing was performed in some patients in order to analyze coding regions and intron boundaries of the COMP gene, using the ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Exome sequencing was performed in patients with no variant in the COMP gene and in patients subsequently included in the study cohort.The Ion Ampliseq Exome kit was used for library preparation. Then the libraries were sequenced in the Ion Proton (Thermo Scientific) and Illumina Next-Seq 550 instruments according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The.vcf files were generated and used for variant interpretation. For filtering, ExAC, dbSNP, and in-house data were used, and common variants with a minor allele frequency > 0.01 were filtered out and the skeletal dysplasia panel (n = 552 genes) was applied for further filtering.

Pathogenicity was assessed using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines [14] for the interpretation of sequence variants, which includes population data, computational and predictive data using various lines of computational evidence (CADD, Polyphen) and segregation data [14, 15]. Publicly available software and databases, including the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) database (https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/) [16], Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 (PolyPhen-2, http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2) [17], and Mutation Taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) [18], were used to assess the clinical significance of the identified novel variants. The three novel variants and one unsubmitted COL9A2 variant were submitted to ClinVar (COMP, c.1303G > C: SCV004814169; COMP c.1854G > C: SCV004814168; MATN3 c.280G > A: SCV004814170; COL9A2 c.186 + 6 T > G: SCV006052425).

The secondary structure of the COMP, MATN3, and SLC26A2 was obtained from the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/) for schematic representation. Multiple-sequence alignment of COMP and MATN3 was obtained in different species, including Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes, Macaca mulatta, Canis lupus familiaris, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, Xenopus tropicalis, and Danio rerio, using the Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/jdispatcher/msa/clustalo) [19].

Results

A total of 27 patients from 14 unrelated families were clinically diagnosed with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. Among them, genetic etiology was identified in 25 patients (n = 25/27, 92.5%) from 12 unrelated families using either Sanger sequencing or exome sequencing.

The clinical and genetic findings of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Pelvis, knee, and hand radiographs are shown in Figs. 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Of these 25 patients, 16 were male (64%) and nine were female (36%). The age at genetic diagnosis ranged from 4 to 50 years, with a median age of 10 years. Eight patients (n = 9/25, 36%) had short stature, 17 patients (n = 17/25, 68%) had joint pain, and seven patients (n = 7/25, 28%) required surgery.

Table 1.

Clinical, radiographic, and molecular findings of the patients

Family Patient Genetic findings Radiographic findings Clinical findings Surgical intervention
Gene Variant Genetic test Spine Pelvis Knee Hands Gender Age at admission (years) Main complaint Short stature Pain
1 1 COMP NM_000095.3

c.1126 G>A

p.(Asp376 Asn)

Sanger sequencing Irregular endplates, anterior ossification defects Epiphyseal irregularities Epiphyseal irregularities Normal M 13 Walking difficulty -  +  na
2 2 Normal Epiphyseal irregularities Genu valgum Epiphyseal irregularities Normal M 6 Short stature  +   +   + 
3 Scoliosis, increased lomber lordosis Short femur neck Genu varum Short metacarpals F 34 Short stature  +  - -
3 4

c.1303 G>C

p.(Asp435His)

(*)

Sanger sequencing Ovoid vertebral bodies Small capital femoral epiphysis Small and irregular epiphysis Irregular-shaped carpal bones and epiphysis F 6 Short stature, joint movement limitation, waddling gait, fatigue  +  - -
4 5

c.1854 G>C

p.(Glu618 Asp)

(**)

Sanger sequencing Mild vertebral irregularities Epipyhseal irregularities Epipyhseal irregularities Normal M 12 Joint pain -  +  -
6 Normal Epipyhseal irregularities, short femur neck, coxa vara Mild epiphyseal irregularities Mildly short metacarpals Small epiphysis M 7 Walking difficulty, joint pain  +   +   + 
5 7

c.949 G>A

p.(Asp317 Asn)

WES Increased lomber lordosis, mild scoliosis Short femur neck epiphyseal irregularities Epipyhseal irregularities Normal F 11 Short stature, fatigue, hip dislocation  +   +   + 
8 Sanger sequencing Severe scoliosis Epipyhseal irregularities, acetabular dysplasia, short femur neck, small capital femoral epiphysis Epipyhseal irregularities Small and irregular-shaped carpal bones F 7 Muscle weakness - -  + 
9 Sanger sequencing na na na na M 39 Short stature, hip dislocation  +  - na
6 10

c.1454 G>A

p.(Arg485His)

WES Normal Epiphyseal irregularities Epiphyseal irregularities small epiphysis Small epiphysis, irregular-shaped carpal bones F 9 Joint pain -  +  -
11 Sanger sequencing Anterior ossification defect Epiphyseal irregularities Epiphyseal irregularities Normal F 11 Joint pain -  +  -
12 Sanger sequencing na na na na M 41 na Na na na
7 13

c.1467 C>A

p.(Asn489Lys)

WES - Small and irregular-shaped carpal bones M 8 Joint pain  +   +   + 
8 14 MATN3 NM_002381.5

c.518 C>A

p.(Ala173 Asp)

Sanger sequencing na Epiphyseal irregularities na Irregular-shaped carpal bones M 4 Walking difficulty -  +  na
9 15

c.280 G>A 

p.(Val94Ile)

(***)

WES Increased lumbar lordosis Small and irregulalar capital femoral epipyhisis Small and irregular epiphysis, glacier crevice sign Irregular-shaped carpal bones and epiphysis M 12 Walking difficulty -  +  -
16 Sanger sequencing Normal Irregular femoral head, short femur neck Normal na M 44 Joint pain -  +   + 
17 Sanger sequencing na na na na M NA na Na na na
18 Sanger sequencing na na na na F NA na Na na na
10 19 SLC26A2 NM_000112.4

c.835 C>T

p.(Arg279 Trp)

WES Mild irregularities, scolisosis Flat capital femoral epiphysis, coxa valga Genu valgum Normal F 10 Joint pain -  +  -
20 Sanger sequencing Normal Flat capital femoral epiphysis Genu valgum Normal F 10 Joint pain -  +  -
11 21

c.1957 T>A

p.(Cys653Ser)

Sanger sequencing Mild platspondyly Coxa vara, epiphyseal irregularities Epiphyseal irregularities, bipartite patella Normal M 10 Joint pain, walking difficulty  +   +  na
22 na Acetabular dysplasia, flat capital femoral epiphysis Double-layered patella Normal M 7 Joint movement limitation -  +  na
23 na na Double-layered patella na M 28 Joint movement limitation Na na na
12 24 COL9A2 NM_001852.4 c.186+6T>G WES na na Epiphyseal irregularities, glacier crevice sign na M 7 Joint pain, difficulty with climbing stairs -  +  -
25 Sanger sequencing Decreased antero-posterior diameter Short femoral necks Genu varum; decreased joint space Mild diaphyseal contruction of the phalanges and metacarpals M 50 Joint pain, walking difficulty, genu varum  +   +   + 

na not available, WES whole exome sequencing, M male, F female

*Novel variants

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Pelvis radiographs of the patients. First row: Patients with COMP variants exhibit small, round epiphyses with irregular contours, except for P2, who has flattened and fragmented epiphyses (left). Coxa vara deformity with short and broad femoral necks is prominent in P7, P13, and P3. The ossified major trochanteric epiphyses are small and irregular in shape for P4 and P7. All patients present with dysplastic acetabula, and the adult patient (P3) has secondary osteoarthritis. Second row: Patients with SLC26A2 variants show flattened epiphyses, and all have dysplastic acetabula. Coxa vara deformity, with short and broad femoral necks, is observed in all patients. Third row: Patients with MATN3 variants have flattened epiphyses, and their femoral necks are short and broad, accompanied by mild acetabular dysplasia. The femoral epiphyses appear relatively normal in the patient with the COL9A2 variant, while his father displays short femoral necks and coxa vara. P, patient; y, years

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Knee radiographs of the patients. All knee epiphyses are small in patients with COMP and MATN3 variants and irregularly shaped in P2, P14, and P15. P2 and P15 exhibit epiphyses with thin edges at the lateral borders. Additionally, flatness of the femoral condyles, with a shallow intercondylar notch, is observed in P14, P15, and P23. The typical finding of SLC26A2-related MED, bipartite patella, is seen in P23 and is indicated with blue lines and arrows. The glacier sign is present in P15 and P24, marked with a purple arrow. P, patient; y, years

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Hand radiographs of the patients and the foot radiograph of P24. All patients, except for the adult patient (P23), exhibit small and irregularly shaped carpal bones and epiphyses of the distal radius and ulna. Patients with COMP variants have short and broad metacarpal and phalangeal bones (brachydactyly), characterized by small, irregularly shaped epiphyses and metaphyseal irregularity. Patients with MATN3 variants do not exhibit brachydactyly but also show mild contour irregularity of the carpal bones. Irregularly shaped tarsal bones are observed in P24, who has a COL9A2 variant. P, patient; y, years

The orthopedic surgeries included corrective procedures for genu valgum in two patients (one patient had bilateral femur osteotomies, the other one had bilateral femur hemiepiphysiodesis); one patient had acetabular dysplasia and underwent Ganz periacetabular osteotomy; one patient with scoliosis had posterior instrumentation and fusion; two patients with proximal femoral deformity had corrective hip procedures, and the last one had total hip arthroplasty for end-stage hip osteoarthritis.

A variety of orthopaedic procedures were applied for the hip, spine, and lower extremity deformities in our patient population: Two patients had distal femoral correction osteotomies and plate fixation for genu valgum deformity. One patient with open growth plates had bilateral medial distal femur guided growth surgery utilizing tension band plates. The most common hip problems in this patient group are acetabular dysplasia and proximal femoral deformity. One of our patients had periacetabular pelvic osteotomy (Ganz) for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia, and two patients had proximal femoral osteotomies. One patient with end-stage hip osteoarthritis due to acetabular dysplasia had total hip arthroplasty surgery. One patient had posterior instrumentation and fusion for scoliosis deformity.

The surgical notes for the 50-year-old patient who underwent surgery during childhood could not be accessed; however, it was learned verbally that the surgery was performed due to curvature in the knees (genu varum deformity?).

In our cohort, we identified two novel variants in the COMP gene, c.1303 G > C; p.(Asp435His) and c.1854 G > C; p.(Glu618 Asp), and one novel variant in the MATN3 gene (c.280 G > A; p.(Val94Ile). According to the ACMG classification, the c.1303G > C variant was deemed “likely pathogenic” (PP3), with a CADD score of 34, PolyPhen2 predicting it as probably damaging, and Mutation Taster indicating it as disease-causing. On the other hand, the c.1854G > C variant was categorized as “uncertain significance” (PM1, PM2), with a CADD score of 23.1, PolyPhen2 predicting it as probably damaging, and Mutation Taster indicating it as disease-causing. Similarly, the c.280G > A variant in the MATN3 gene was also classified as “uncertain significance” (PM1, PM2), with a CADD score of 26.9, PolyPhen2 predicting it as probably damaging, and Mutation Taster indicating it as disease-causing. The three novel variants were located in the functional domains of the relevant proteins (Fig. 4) and the substituted amino acid residues were found to be evolutionarily conserved among different species (Fig. 5). We identified an intronic variant in COL9A2 (c.186 + 6 T > G), affecting the splice donor site of intron 3–4. This variant has been previously reported to cause exon skipping, leading to the deletion of exon 3 in the transcript, and is associated with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia [20]. Based on ACMG guidelines, the variant was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). The variant was inherited from the affected father. Furthermore, it is absent from the gnomAD population database, fulfilling the PM2 criterion. Although classified as VUS, the presence of functional evidence supporting a splicing defect strengthens its potential relevance to the disease.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

A schematic representation of the proteins and locations of the variants. COMP protein domains with 6 different missense variants identified in patients (a), MATN3 protein domains with two different missense variants identified in patients (b), and SLC26A2 protein domain and transmembrane regions with two different missense variants identified in patients (c). The domains are color-coded to indicate their functional regions, while the missense variants are marked with different colors to show their locations

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The amino acid multiple sequence alignment. COMP protein across different species. The alignment emphasizes the residues at positions 435 (Asp435) and 618 (Glu618), which are highlighted in blue and green, respectively (a). MATN3 protein across different species. The alignment emphasizes the residue at position 94 (Val94) which is highlighted in yellow (b)

Discussion

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED) is a relatively common skeletal dysplasia, with a prevalence estimated to be greater than 1 in 10,000 births [3]. Patients exhibit considerable clinical variability, and individuals with milder forms of MED may remain undiagnosed [3, 21]. Initial symptoms are often rheumatologic or neurologic, such as joint pain, difficulty walking, and signs of myopathy. Typically, patients appear normal at birth, but clinical manifestations emerge in early childhood, commonly presenting as joint pain. Although adult height is generally within the normal range, it may be mildly reduced. Joint pain tends to worsen progressively, and joint deformities may develop. This condition frequently leads to early-onset osteoarthritis, particularly affecting large weight-bearing joints [22].

MED is a genetically heterogeneous condition, with seven known genes implicated in its etiology, making it challenging to distinguish between the various subtypes based solely on radiologic features. However, certain distinguishing characteristics can aid in the diagnostic process. COMP-related MED (Type 1) is the most common form and accounts for up to half of all cases [3, 8]. In our study, the most frequent type was Type 1, with 13 of 25 patients (52%) from seven of 12 families (58.3%) carrying a COMP variant—findings that are consistent with the literature. Patients with Type 1 MED typically present with muscular hypotonia and mild myopathy, characterized by mildly elevated serum creatine kinase levels, genu varum, and joint laxity. These findings often lead to referrals to pediatric neurology due to delayed ambulation and suspicion of a neuromuscular disorder based on delayed motor development and increased serum creatine kinase levels [2325].

Radiologic features associated with Type 1 MED include delayed carpal bone age, particularly more delayed than that of the phalangeal epiphyses, delayed ossification of the proximal femoral epiphyses, and small, rounded proximal femoral epiphyses (Figs. 1 and 2). Additional ossification centers may be present, with a distinct “glacier crevice” sign observed at the knees. The carpal bones often exhibit irregular contours (Fig. 3). Additional skeletal abnormalities, such as brachydactyly, small and rounded metacarpal epiphyses, ragged contours of tarsal bones, and mild spinal dysplasia—including endplate irregularities and mild platyspondyly—may also be seen [8, 26]. Furthermore, acetabular changes are common in COMP-related MED [22], and adults with this condition may exhibit coxa vara and shortened femoral necks (Fig. 1) [8].

Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, also known as Perthes disease, primarily affects the hip joint and is characterized by avascular necrosis of the femoral head, which can lead to deformity and potential arthritis in the affected hip. Patients with MED can sometimes be misdiagnosed as having Perthes disease, as both conditions may involve avascular necrosis of the femoral heads. However, it is important to note that MED is a distinct condition, characterized by abnormal development of the growth plates in multiple joints—unlike Perthes disease, which involves both hips in only 10 to 20% of cases [27]. While there may be similarities in the presentation of avascular necrosis in both Legg-Calve-Perthes disease and MED, the underlying pathophysiology and clinical features of these conditions are markedly different [22].

MATN3-related MED (Type 5) is the second most prevalent form of the condition, although it has been identified as the most common type in Western Asia populations [2, 26, 28]. In our study, MATN3 variants were the second most common, along with SLC26A2 variants. In MATN3-related MED, carpal bone ossification is delayed; however, the bones are not irregularly shaped, as in COMP-related MED (Fig. 3) [8]. Femoral and knee epiphyseal ossification is also delayed, and the proximal femoral epiphyses are less rounded than those in COMP-related MED [8]. A distinct “Harlequin hat” or “Dutch Wooden shoe” appearance of the distal femoral epiphyses, characterized by a triangular shape with thinning at the lateral sides, serves as a significant indicator for MATN3-related MED; however, this phenotype was not observed in our patients [2, 8, 26]. Additionally, vertical metaphyseal striations in the distal femora are commonly observed in this type [26]. The clinical presentation of MATN3-related MED is generally milder in comparison to COMP-related MED [22, 29]. Pathogenic variants in COL9A1, COL9A2, and COL9A3 are responsible for Types 6, 2, and 3 MED, respectively. These subtypes are considered to be “rare” and represent the mildest forms of the condition [3032]. In our cohort, we identified two patients from a single family with a COL9A2 variant. Patients with COL9-related MED may exhibit myopathy findings similar to those seen in COMP-related MED [30]. Radiographically, knee epiphyses are more commonly affected in COL9-related MED, whereas the proximal femoral epiphyses are relatively spared [7, 8].

MED Type 4 is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner and is caused by biallelic variants in SLC26A2. Approximately half of affected individuals present with clubfoot and clinodactyly. Additionally, some patients may exhibit cystic ear swelling [4]. Notably, joint laxity is absent in SLC26A2-related MED, whereas joint contractures are a common feature. Genu valgum (knock-knee deformity) is a prevalent manifestation of SLC26A2-related MED and is often accompanied by mild brachydactyly. Radiographic evaluation reveals flat epiphyses, a distinguishing feature compared to the rounded epiphyses observed in COMP-related MED. Furthermore, carpal bone age is typically advanced in SLC26A2-related MED in contrast to findings in COMP-MED [8]. A characteristic radiographic finding associated with SLC26A2-related MED is the presence of a double-layered patella, observed in approximately 60% of affected individuals [33]. While this finding is specific to SLC26A2-related MED, it is not highly sensitive and may also be seen in other MED types [4, 26, 34]. In some cases, variations such as a bipartite patella may be observed, as was demonstrated in our cohort.

Recent research has identified a seventh subtype of MED associated with biallelic pathogenic variants in the CANT1 gene (OMIM #617719). To the best of our knowledge, only two studies have been reported to date, one of which originated from our center [6, 35]. Patients with this condition often present with distinctive features, such as a monkey-wrench appearance of the proximal femora, advanced carpal and tarsal bone age, joint dislocations, and osteopenia. While these manifestations overlap with those observed in the allelic disorder Desbuquois dysplasia (DBQD) and the Kim variant, the overall severity of symptoms in this newly identified subtype tends to be milder than in DBQD [6, 35].

The etiology of MED involves seven identified genes. However, a significant proportion of patients, estimated at 15–20%, remain without a genetic diagnosis, suggesting potential associations with as-yet-unidentified genetic factors [6]. In our cohort, a genetic etiology was identified in 12 out of 14 families, aligning with existing literature and accounting for 85.7% of cases. This diagnostic rate may be influenced by several factors, including intronic variants, intragenic copy number variations, and complex structural rearrangements within known genes. Additionally, undiagnosed cases may be attributable to genes not yet been implicated in the pathogenesis of MED.

We observed significant variability in clinical and radiologic findings among family members, even within the same family in our cohort. The variability in clinical presentation among affected individuals is a well-documented phenomenon in genetic disorders, including MED. This variability can arise from several factors, such as differences in genetic backgrounds, environmental influences, and the presence of modifier genes. Additionally, our findings align with existing literature that highlights the complexity of genetic disorders. The diverse clinical manifestations observed in our cohort underscore the need for a comprehensive understanding of how genetic and environmental factors interact to influence the phenotypic expression of MED.

The limitations of our study include the incomplete segregation analysis for patients whose parental DNA could not be obtained, as well as the lack of experimental functional validation for the three novel variants identified, which were supported by in silico analyses indicating pathogenicity. In the absence of experimental data, it is important to explicitly recognize this gap and suggest that future research should focus on functional studies to validate these novel variants. Additionally, further research and advances in genetic analysis techniques are essential for uncovering these elusive genetic contributors and expanding our understanding of the etiology of MED.

Conclusion

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasias encompass a diverse group of genetically heterogeneous disorders, resulting in variable clinical and radiological features. It is important for healthcare providers to consider multiple epiphyseal dysplasias in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with joint pain, walking difficulties, or symptoms resembling Perthes disease or myopathy. A multidisciplinary approach, involving professionals from various specialties, is essential for the effective management of MEDs. Additionally, ongoing orthopedic follow-up is crucial for monitoring disease progression and addressing the specific needs of these patients. As new genes associated with MEDs are identified and more cases are reported, a more accurate and comprehensive approach to diagnosis and management will continue to evolve.

Abbreviations

CANT1

Calcium-activated nucleotidase 1

COMP

Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein

DBQD

Desbuquois dysplasia

MATN3

Matrillin 3

SLC26A2

Solute carrier family 26 member 2

COL9A1/COL9A2/COL9A3

Collagen type 9 A1/A2/A3

MED

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia

Authors’ contributions

TD: design of the work, writing Gİ: genetic evaluation AEY: radiographic evaluation GÜD: supervision GEU: supervision GY: orthopedic evaluation PÖŞK: design of the work, writing, supervision, revised critically All authors approved the final version to be published.

Funding

Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval

The study protocol was approved by the Hacettepe University Ethics Committee (GO 17/321–19) and followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and the parents included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Handa A, Nishimura G, Zhan MX, Bennett DL, El-Khoury GY (2022) A primer on skeletal dysplasias. Jpn J Radiol 40(3):245–261. 10.1007/s11604-021-01206-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bone dysplasia—an atlas of genetic disorders of skeletal development (fourth edition)’ Edited by: Jürgen W Spranger, Paula W Brill, Christine Hall, Gen Nishimura, Andrea Superti-Furga, Sheila Unger. Published by: Oxford University Press, 2018
  • 3.Briggs MD, Wright MJ, Mortier GR (2003) Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2025 [PubMed]
  • 4.Unger S, Superti-Furga A (2002) SLC26A2-related multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1306/
  • 5.Unger S, Ferreira CR, Mortier GR et al (2023) Nosology of genetic skeletal disorders: 2023 revision. Am J Med Genet A 191(5):1164–1209. 10.1002/ajmg.a.63132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Balasubramanian K, Li B, Krakow D et al (2017) MED resulting from recessively inherited mutations in the gene encoding calcium-activated nucleotidase CANT1. Am J Med Genet A 173(9):2415–2421. 10.1002/ajmg.a.38349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dennis EP, Greenhalgh-Maychell PL, Briggs MD (2021) Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia and related disorders: molecular genetics, disease mechanisms, and therapeutic avenues. Dev Dyn 250(3):345–359. 10.1002/dvdy.221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Unger S, Bonafé L, Superti-Furga A (2008) Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia: clinical and radiographic features, differential diagnosis and molecular basis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 22(1):19–32. 10.1016/j.berh.2007.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Handa A, Grigelioniene G, Nishimura G (2023) Skeletal dysplasia families: a stepwise approach to diagnosis. Radiographics 43(5):e220067. 10.1148/rg.220067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yilmaz G, Oto M, Thabet AM et al (2014) Correction of lower extremity angular deformities in skeletal dysplasia with hemiepiphysiodesis: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop 34(3):336–345. 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Treble NJ, Jensen FO, Bankier A, Rogers JG, Cole WG (1990) Development of the hip in multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. Natural history and susceptibility to premature osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 72(6):1061–1064. 10.1302/0301-620X.72B6.2246289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lindgren AM, Bomar JD, Upasani VV, Wenger DR (2022) Treatment outcomes of hips in patients with epiphyseal dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop B 31(6):554–559. 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chang YY, Lee CC, Lin SC, Kuo KN, Chang JF, Wu KW, Wang TM (2023) The favorable outcome of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the hip osteoarthritis in multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 18(1):340. 10.1186/s13023-023-02920-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S et al (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 17(5):405–424. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Durkie M, Cassidy E-J, Berry I, et al (2024) ACGS best practice guidelines for variant classification in rare disease 2024. Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service; Available from: https://www.acgs.uk.com/media/12533/uk-practice-guidelines-for-variant-classification-v12-2024.pdf
  • 16.Rentzsch P, Schubach M, Shendure J, Kircher M (2021) CADD-Splice-improving genome-wide variant effect prediction using deep learning-derived splice scores. Genome Med 13(1):31. 10.1186/s13073-021-00835-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L et al (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7(4):248–249. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D (2010) MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods 7(8):575–576. 10.1038/nmeth0810-575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D et al (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Spayde EC, Joshi AP, Wilcox WR, Briggs M, Cohn DH, Olsen BR (2000) Exon skipping mutation in the COL9A2 gene in a family with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia. Matrix Biol 19(2):121–128. 10.1016/s0945-053x(00)00055-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jackson GC, Mittaz-Crettol L, Taylor JA et al (2012) Pseudoachondroplasia and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia: a 7-year comprehensive analysis of the known disease genes identify novel and recurrent mutations and provides an accurate assessment of their relative contribution. Hum Mutat 33(1):144–157. 10.1002/humu.21611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seo SG, Song HR, Kim HW et al (2014) Comparison of orthopaedic manifestations of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia caused by MATN3 versus COMP mutations: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:84. 10.1186/1471-2474-15-84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Swaroop S, Srivastava P, Diwakar K, Laik JK, Mishra M, Anand R (2025) An ınteresting case of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia masquerading as myopathy in a Southeast Asian girl. Cureus 17(2):e78400. 10.7759/cureus.78400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Piróg KA, Katakura Y, Mironov A, Briggs MD (2013) Mild myopathy is associated with COMP but not MATN3 mutations in mouse models of genetic skeletal diseases. PLoS One. 8(11):e82412. 10.1371/journal.pone.0082412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Briggs MD, Brock J, Ramsden SC, Bell PA (2014) Genotype to phenotype correlations in cartilage oligomeric matrix protein associated chondrodysplasias. Eur J Hum Genet 22(11):1278–1282. 10.1038/ejhg.2014.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim OH, Park H, Seong MW et al (2011) Revisit of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia: ethnic difference in genotypes and comparison of radiographic features linked to the COMP and MATN3 genes. Am J Med Genet A 155A(11):2669–2680. 10.1002/ajmg.a.34246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mills S, Burroughs KE (2025) Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease. [Updated 2023 Jul 10]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513230/ [PubMed]
  • 28.Itoh T, Shirahama S, Nakashima E et al (2006) Comprehensive screening of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia mutations in Japanese population. Am J Med Genet A 140(12):1280–1284. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mäkitie O, Mortier GR, Czarny-Ratajczak M et al (2004) Clinical and radiographic findings in multiple epiphyseal dysplasia caused by MATN3 mutations: description of 12 patients. Am J Med Genet A 125A(3):278–284. 10.1002/ajmg.a.20486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jackson GC, Marcus-Soekarman D, Stolte-Dijkstra I, Verrips A, Taylor JA, Briggs MD (2010) Type IX collagen gene mutations can result in multiple epiphyseal dysplasia that is associated with osteochondritis dissecans and a mild myopathy. Am J Med Genet A 152A(4):863–869. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Czarny-Ratajczak M, Lohiniva J, Rogala P et al (2001) A mutation in COL9A1 causes multiple epiphyseal dysplasia: further evidence for locus heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet 69(5):969–980. 10.1086/324023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Muragaki Y, Mariman EC, van Beersum SE et al (1996) A mutation in the gene encoding the alpha 2 chain of the fibril-associated collagen IX, COL9A2, causes multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (EDM2). Nat Genet 12(1):103–105. 10.1038/ng0196-103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li S, Sheng Y, Wang X, Wang Q, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wu C, Jiang X (2024) Biallelic variants in SLC26A2 cause multiple epiphyseal dysplasia-4 by disturbing chondrocyte homeostasis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 19(1):245. 10.1186/s13023-024-03228-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Markova T, Kenis V, Melchenko E et al (2022) Clinical and genetic characteristics of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4. Genes (Basel). 13(9):1512. 10.3390/genes13091512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Daşar T, ÜrelDemir G, İmren G, Utine GE, Yilmaz G, ŞimşekKiper PÖ (2025) From desbuquois dysplasia to multiple epiphyseal dysplasia: the clinical ımpact of a CANT1 variant across five unrelated families. Am J Med Genet A. 197(4):e63950. 10.1002/ajmg.a.63950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from European Journal of Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES