Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of autoclave sterilization on the leaching of nickel ions from stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands used in pediatric dentistry. Sixty space maintainer bands and 60 stainless steel crowns were divided into sterilized (Amsco Century V‐120 Prevac steam sterilizer) and non‐sterilized groups. These samples were immersed in artificial saliva, placed in individual petri dishes, and then incubated at 37°C. The samples were analyzed for 42 days using a gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) machine to quantify the release of nickel ions. Nickel release was higher in the sterilized samples than in the non‐sterilized samples for both space maintainer bands and stainless steel crowns. This trend persisted throughout most days of the experiment, with a peak release observed on day 7. Autoclave sterilization had a significant impact on ion release, raising potential concerns regarding the material's biocompatibility. Dentists should be mindful of the increased nickel release observed from sterilized crowns and bands, as this information could influence treatment decisions, especially in children who are predisposed to allergies.
Keywords: dental crowns, ion leaching, ionization, materials properties, pediatric dentistry
INTRODUCTION
Prefabricated stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands have become essential dental devices in pediatric dentistry owing to the high prevalence of dental caries among children [1, 2].
Stainless steel crowns are preformed crowns that are used for a wealth of purposes: restoration of deciduous molars that have undergone pulpal therapy; as multi‐surface restorations for caries; as protection in patients at high risk of developing caries; as protection of deciduous teeth with developmental defects such as amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta, or enamel hypoplasia; and as protection of teeth showing extensive wear [3]. These crowns protect primary molars by reducing the risk of post‐operative symptoms [4]. Their prefabricated design simplifies use and reduces chair time and cost [5].
In contrast, space maintainer bands are metal bands placed on an abutment tooth as part of a space‐maintaining appliance. They prevent space loss and tooth drift and maintain proper alignment [6]. Space maintainer bands are indicated following the early loss of a deciduous tooth to preserve space for the eruption of permanent teeth. Their appropriate use can prevent the need for extensive orthodontic treatment [6].
The popularity of stainless steel crowns and space maintainers is due to their ease of use and affordability. However, concerns have been raised about the nickel (Ni) content in these alloys, which has been linked to allergic reactions [7, 8]. The release of nickel into the oral cavity after cementation has prompted inquiries into the biocompatibility of stainless steel crowns and space maintainers [3, 9]. Factors such as temperature, pH, moisture, and oral conditions may influence the rate of nickel ions leaching from these materials [10, 11].
Nickel is added to enhance durability and to reduce costs, but its release may exceed safe daily intake limits, leading to health risks such as allergies, dermatitis, gingivitis, and tooth enamel damage. These potential effects highlight the need for monitoring and safer material alternatives [12].
The impact of the heat and sterilization procedures commonly used in dental clinics on the leaching of ions from stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands has not been studied thoroughly. This knowledge gap necessitates further investigation, especially considering that fitting the stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands often involves trying multiple sizes until an optimal fit is achieved [13]. This trial‐and‐error process results in unused crowns and bands that may be contaminated with blood, saliva, or infectious microorganisms [14]. Therefore, sterilization of these materials before insertion into another patient's mouth is crucial to prevent cross‐contamination [15].
Numerous disinfection and sterilization techniques are available in dental clinics. However, autoclaves are widely regarded as the most effective for eliminating harmful pathogens from contaminated crowns [15]. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effect of autoclave sterilization on the release of nickel ions from pediatric stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands when immersed in artificial saliva. The null hypothesis was that autoclave sterilization has no statistically significant effect on the release of nickel ions from pediatric stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands when immersed in artificial saliva.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study was approved by the College of Dentistry Research Center at King Saud University (FR0653). The in vitro experiments were conducted at the Dental University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
A total of 60 space maintainer bands (size 36, 3M Unitek) and 60 stainless steel crowns (size lower E5, 3M ESPE) were purchased. The chemical compositions analyzed, based on manufacturer specifications, were as follows: iron 5%–74%, chromium 17%–19%, and nickel 9%–13%.
Following the method of a previous study [16], the space maintainer bands and stainless steel crowns were allocated to one of two interventions, autoclave sterilization or no sterilization. The sterilization process was carried out using an Amsco Century V‐120 Prevac steam sterilizer (STERIS) for 4 min and a temperature of 121°C (250°F), followed by a drying period of 15 min.
Following the intervention, each specimen was immersed in 20 mL of artificial saliva (consisting of 0.8 g NaCl, 2.4 g KCl, 1.5 g NaH2PO4, 0.1 g Na2S, and 2 g CO(NH2)2), and the pH was adjusted to 6.75 ± 0.05. Each dish was sealed securely to prevent evaporation of the artificial saliva solution. Each crown or band was placed in an individual petri dish on a plastic stand to ensure no contact with any metallic material during the test, and incubated at 37°C using a general incubator (model JSGI‐150T, JS Research). The required saliva samples (2 mL) were drawn from each solution and analyzed separately on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 42 to measure the concentration of released Ni ions in artificial saliva using a gas chromatography‐mass spectrometer (GC‐MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
To maintain the original composition of the artificial saliva and to prevent saturation with released ions, fresh artificial saliva samples were used after each nickel (Ni) ion concentration measurement. This procedure was performed on days 7, 14, and 21; the saliva in the samples was completely replaced with new artificial saliva. All dishes were gently agitated after immersing the stainless steel crowns or space maintainer bands to ensure thorough coverage and to achieve a uniform distribution of the solution. Seven days after the initial immersion of the stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands, samples of the artificial saliva were analyzed, and readings were recorded (second reading). This procedure was repeated for the third, fourth, and fifth readings on days 14, 21, and 42.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using an independent sample t‐test. Statistical significance was set at a critical value of p = 0.05, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using spss statistics for windows, version 29.0.2.0 (IBM).
RESULTS
The maximum release of Ni was observed in sterilized stainless steel crowns on day 7, 537,811.3 ppm after which it decreased to 44,036.2 ppm on day 14 and 177.8 ppm on day 21. Significantly higher amounts of ions were released in the sterilized group than in the non‐sterilized group on days 7, 14, and 12 (Table 1). On day 42, no nickel release was observed irrespective of the sterilization status.
TABLE 1.
The release of nickel ions from stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands as a function of time for sterilized and non‐sterilized specimens.
| Stainless steel crowns (N = 30) | Space maintainer bands (N = 30) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time point | Procedure | Mean (ppm) ± SD | p‐value | Mean (ppm) ± SD | p‐value |
| Day 0 | Non‐sterilized | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Sterilized | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Day 7 | Non‐sterilized | 16,685.5 ± 2792.1 | <0.001* | 1214.2 ± 239.6 | <0.001* |
| Sterilized | 537,811.3 ± 27,740.5 | 233,463.7 ± 11,142.4 | |||
| Day 14 | Non‐sterilized | 4985.7 ± 617.7 | <0.001* | 769.4 ± 41.4 | <0.001* |
| Sterilized | 44,036.2 ± 5768.9 | 12,881.9 ± 1095.7 | |||
| Day 21 | Non‐sterilized | 177.8 ± 43.1 | <0.001* | 36.4 ± 5.9 | <0.001* |
| Sterilized | 243.9 ± 80.7 | 2239.6 ± 156.1 | |||
| Day 42 | Non‐sterilized | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| Sterilized | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
The highest release of Ni ions was observed in the sterilized space maintainer bands on day 7 (233,463.7 ppm) after which it decreased to 12,881.9 ppm on day 14 and to 2239.6 ppm on day 21. Significantly higher levels of ions were released in the sterilized space maintainer bands than in the non‐sterilized bands between days 7 and 21.
The samples of the stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands exhibited a higher Ni release from the sterilized samples than from the non‐sterilized samples (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

Mean Ni ion concentrations released from stainless‐steel crowns (SSC) and space maintainer bands (SM) before and after sterilization.
DISCUSSION
The use of stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands in pediatric dentistry has revolutionized the treatment of primary dentition. However, these nickel‐containing appliances are expected to corrode because the alloys are exposed to varying pH levels and temperatures in the oral cavity [10].
In the present study, a higher release of Ni ions from sterilized stainless steel crowns was observed on days 7 and 14 than from non‐sterilized crowns. This phenomenon can be attributed to the combined effects of heat sterilization and corrosion on the sterilized stainless steel crowns. Sterilization processes can alter the surface chemistry of stainless steel [17] because they often involve high temperatures and/or harsh chemicals. These conditions can lead to the formation of a new surface layer on stainless steel, which affects its susceptibility to corrosion and ion leaching [18]. Additionally, high temperatures can alter the microstructure of stainless steels, creating new grain boundaries and other metal defects that serve as pathways for ion leaching [19].
The amount of Ni ions leached from stainless steel crowns after sterilization depends on several factors, such as the type of sterilization process used, sterilization temperature and duration, and the composition of the stainless steel [17]. Similar findings regarding ion levels over time were reported by Amanna et al. [9], Tiwari et al. [10], and Kulkarni et al. [20] who studied the release rates of ions and observed a decrease in Ni ion release from stainless steel crowns as the study period progressed. This is consistent with the findings of the present study.
The decrease in nickel ion release observed on day 21 could be due to the material reaching a saturation point. After an initial period of higher ion release, the material may have released the majority of the available nickel ions, leading to a decrease in further release over time. This phenomenon has been observed in studies in which nickel release from stainless steel crowns decreased significantly after the first week, with levels dropping to zero after 2 weeks [9, 21].
The pH level plays a crucial role, as highlighted by Menek et al. [22] who evaluated Ni release from stainless steel crowns immersed in artificial saliva for 4 weeks across various pH values. They noted a consistent increase in the Ni release over time under highly acidic conditions (pH = 2.5). Conversely, in more neutral environments (pH = 6.25), the Ni release steadily decreased over time. The highest amount of Ni was released on the first day and decreased by the end of the study period. Overall, they observed that lower pH levels were correlated with increased Ni release. This can be explained by the formation of a passivation layer. When a stainless steel crown is initially placed in the mouth, it comes into contact with various corrosive agents in saliva, food, and drinks [10]. These agents can dissolve the surface of stainless steel, resulting in the release of Ni ions into the surrounding environment [23]. However, over time, a passivation layer develops on the surface of the stainless steel crown. This passivation layer is a thin oxidized film that acts as a protective barrier, shielding the underlying stainless steel from further corrosion [21]. As this passivation layer becomes thicker, it inhibits the release of Ni ions from the stainless steel crown. This phenomenon likely explains why the initial ion leaching activity was the highest and then decreased over time in the study samples.
In addition, anodic inhibitors are substances that reduce the corrosion rates of metals such as titanium by altering the electrochemical behavior at the metal surface. They typically work by promoting the formation of a more stable and protective oxide layer. In the case of titanium, anodic inhibitors help to strengthen the passive oxide layer, which is crucial for the material's corrosion resistance [24]. These inhibitors play crucial roles in maintaining the stability of dental alloys. However, if a patient consumes a diet rich in acidic foods and beverages, the anodic inhibitors present in the saliva may become depleted. This depletion can accelerate the corrosion rate of metal alloys used in dental applications. Dietary habits and oral hygiene practices can significantly influence the longevity and performance of dental restorations.
Furthermore, several other factors can influence the ion leaching activity in stainless steel crowns over time, including the composition of the stainless steel, manufacturing process, patient's diet, and oral hygiene habits [25]. The ion leaching activity of stainless steel crowns is a complex process that is influenced by multiple variables, including sterilization methods. These factors collectively determine the extent and rate of Ni ion release from stainless steel crowns in the oral environment.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has established a Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for nickel of 13 µg/kg body weight per day [26]. However, in individuals with nickel allergies, even small amounts of nickel can trigger allergic reactions. This occurs because their immune systems are sensitized to nickel, recognizing it as a harmful substance and causing hypersensitive responses upon exposure. Research shows that even minimal concentrations of nickel, as low as 0.5 ppm, can provoke reactions in sensitized individuals. These findings highlight that, for people with nickel allergies, even trace amounts of nickel can be problematic. Therefore, it is essential for these individuals to avoid exposure to nickel‐containing items to prevent allergic reactions [27].
It was found that 23.7% of pediatric patients in the USA tested positive for nickel allergy across various age groups [28], while the prevalence ranged from 8% to 10% in the European population [29]. Nickel allergy is a significant concern in pediatric populations, with a notable increase in prevalence linked to early and frequent nickel exposures. Limiting such exposures during childhood may help to reduce the risk of developing nickel allergy [30].
As a result, it is advisable not to reuse sterilized bands or crowns to minimize the nickel exposure. Furthermore, exploring alternative materials and limiting unnecessary nickel exposure can help to reduce the associated risks. Material choices are customized based on individual allergy risks, and may be the most effective strategy to address this issue while preserving the functional benefits of benefits of stainless steel crowns and space maintainers.
Healthcare providers should focus on identifying at risk patients through allergy testing and history taking before selecting materials. Additionally, manufacturers could explore modifications to reduce nickel ion release from existing materials, potentially minimizing the risk of sensitization.
Based on the results obtained, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis, which stated that autoclave sterilization significantly affects the release of Ni ions.
Overall, the findings of the present study suggest that sterilization procedures may affect the biocompatibility of stainless steel crowns and space maintainers, and careful consideration is needed when using these materials in pediatric dentistry, especially for patients with a potential nickel allergy.
Even though other materials and brands may have slight differences in composition, they could still exhibit similar characteristics. If the composition of other brands is identical to the one studied, it is likely that the results would be consistent, so testing additional brands of stainless steel crowns and space maintainers could offer greater insights and improve the generalizability of the findings.
The experiment was conducted in vitro, with samples immersed in artificial saliva and incubated at a controlled temperature. While this provides useful data on ion leaching, it may not fully replicate the complex biological environment inside the human mouth, where factors such as pH, temperature fluctuations, and mechanical stress can influence ion release.
Further studies could be conducted with long‐term clinical studies involving pediatric patients to evaluate the actual impact of sterilization on nickel ion release in a real‐world setting, to investigate the effects of various sterilization techniques (e.g., autoclave, dry heat, chemical sterilization, ultraviolet light) on the leaching of nickel and other metals from stainless steel crowns and space maintainers, and to extend the research to analyze the leaching of other metals such as chromium.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization: N. Alessa, H. Alhamdan, S. Alrobaish; Formal analysis: N. Alessa, H. Alhamdan, S. Alrobaish, N. AlQahtani, N. Alarifi; Investigation: N. Alessa, N. AlQahtani, N. Alarifi, R. Alessa; Methodology: N. Alessa, H. Alhamdan, S. Alrobaish, N. AlQahtani, N. Alarifi, R. Alessa; Writing — original draft: H. Alhamdan, S. Alrobaish, N. AlQahtani, N. Alarifi; Writing — review & editing: N. Alessa, M. Almutairi, L. Alhowaish, M. Al‐Homaidhi, R. Alessa.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the College of Dentistry Research Center and Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia for funding this research project
Alessa N, Alhamdan H, Alrobaish S, AlQahtani N, Alarifi N, Almutairi M, et al. Effect of autoclave sterilization on nickel ion release from stainless steel crowns and space maintainer bands. Eur J Oral Sci. 2025;133:e70013. 10.1111/eos.70013
REFERENCES
- 1. Setia V, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Sekhon HK. Space maintainers in dentistry: past to present. Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2402–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ghadimi S, Seraj B, Ostadalipour A, Askari E. Comparison of canine overlap in pediatric patients requiring stainless steel crown placement under general anesthesia before and after the procedure. Front Dent. 2019;16:78–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Anusha K, Sridevi E, Sai Sankar AJ, Sridhar M, Sankar KS, Chowdary KH. An in vitro evaluation of biodegradability of stainless steel crowns at various salivary pH. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31:569–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, Keightley AJ, Lamont T, Santamaria RM. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;b CD005512. 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Singh D, Wilson I, Radhika C, Malik M, Shivani M. A split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the clinical performance of primary posterior esthetic and stainless steel crown. J Pharm Negat Results. 2022;13:817–23. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jitesh S, Mathew G. Space maintainer – a review. Drug Invent Today. 2019;11:21–5. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Riedel F, Aparicio‐Soto M, Curato C, Thierse HJ, Siewert K, Luch A. Immunological mechanisms of metal allergies and the nickel‐specific TCR‐pMHC interface. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:10867. 10.3390/ijerph182010867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gates A, Jakubowski JA, Regina AC. Nickel toxicology. Updated 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592400/ [PubMed]
- 9. Amanna E, Bhat S, Hegde S. An in vitro evaluation of nickel and chromium release from different commercially available stainless steel crowns. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37:31–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tiwari S, Saxena S. Effects of pH and time on nickel ion release from pediatric stainless‐steel crowns: an in‐vitro comparative study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022;14(Suppl 1):S545–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Anand A, Sharma A, Kumar P, Sandhu M, Sachdeva S, Sachdev V. A comparative study of biodegradation of nickel and chromium from space maintainers: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8:37–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Malekzadeh Shafaroudi A, Nasiri P, Nahvi A. Nickel sensitivity in children due to using stainless steel crowns: a narrative review. J Pediatr Rev. 2021;9:145–52. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Moradinia M, Sarlak H, Mohammad‐Rabei E, Almasi‐Hashiani A, Shamsi A. Determination of proper band size for stainless steel crowns of primary second molars: a cross‐sectional study. J Orthod Sci. 2022;11:45. 10.4103/jos.jos_6_22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Davangere Padmanabh SK, Patel V. The effect of sterilization and disinfection on the physical‐mechanical properties of preformed crowns. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021;39:53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Darshan V, Indushekar KR, Saraf BG, Sheoran N, Sharma B, Sardana D. A comparison of decontamination methods of tried‐in preformed metal crowns: an in‐vivo study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20:537–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Biradar R, Siaddaiah SB, Bhat PK. Evaluation of nickel and titanium releasing from titanium‐coated stainless steel crowns regarding trimming: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;17:524–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Porto AN, Borges ÁH, Semenoff‐Segundo A, Raslan SA, Pedro FL, Jorge AO, Bandeca MC. Effect of repeated sterilization cycles on the physical properties of scaling instruments: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:1–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Johnson GK, Perry FU, Pelleu GB Jr. Effect of four anticorrosive dips on the cutting efficiency of dental carbide burs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987;114:648–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yu X, Ji Z. Grain boundary in oxide scale during high‐temperature metal processing. Study of Grain Boundary Character. InTech; 2017. Available from: 10.5772/66211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kulkarni P, Agrawal S, Bansal A, Jain A, Tiwari U, Anand A. Assessment of nickel release from various dental appliances used routinely in pediatric dentistry. Indian J Dent. 2016;7:81–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ramazani N, Ahmadi R, Darijani M. Assessment of nickel release from stainless steel crowns. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11:328–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Menek N, Başaran S, Karaman Y, Ceylan G, Tunç Ş. Investigation of nickel ion release from stainless steel crowns by square wave voltammetry. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:6465–71. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kodaira H, Ohno K, Fukase N, Kuroda M, Adachi S, Kikuchi M, Asada Y. Release and systemic accumulation of heavy metals from preformed crowns used in restoration of primary teeth. J Oral Sci. 2013;55:161–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Xu Z, Li Q, Shao X. Effect of anodic inhibitors on the electrochemical behavior and corrosion resistance of titanium in acidic solutions. Electrochim Acta. 2019;306:167–75. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Oh KT, Kim KN. Ion release and cytotoxicity of stainless steel wires. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:533–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) . Risk assessment of nickel in food and drinking water. EFSA J. 2020;18(11):6268. 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Menné T. Quantitative aspects of nickel dermatitis. Sensitization and eliciting threshold concentrations. Sci Total Environ. 1994;148:275–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Warshaw EM, Aschenbeck KA, DeKoven JG, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Sasseville D, et al. Epidemiology of pediatric nickel sensitivity: retrospective review of North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) data 1994–2014. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:664–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M, Menné T, Johansen JD. Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: A clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81:227–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Silverberg NB, Pelletier JL, Jacob SE, Schneider LC. Nickel allergic contact dermatitis: identification, treatment, and prevention. Pediatrics. 2020;145:e20200628. 10.1542/peds.2020-0628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
