Table 2.

Quality assessment based on Cochranes Collaboration’s tool risk of bias assessment.

Study name	Random sequence generation	Allocation concealment	Blinding of participants and personnel	Blinding of outcome assessment		Incomplete outcome data	Selective reporting		Other bias	Overall bias
Brady et al. 2021 [31]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Kotarsky et al. 2021 [34]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Moro et al. 2016 [12]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Moro et al. 2020 [36]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		High risk	Low risk		Unclear risk
Isenmann et al. 2021 [33]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Tinsley et al. 2019 [41]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Low risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Stratton et al. 2020 [39]	Low risk	Unclear risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		High risk	Low risk		Unclear risk
Tinsley et al. 2017 [40]	Low risk	Unclear risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Tovar et al. 2021 [42]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Martinez et al. 2021 [35]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Correia et al. 2021 [8]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Ribeiro et al. 2021 [37]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Correia et al. 2023 [9]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Haganes et al. 2022 [32]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk	Low risk		Low risk	Low risk		Low risk
Richardson et al. 2023 [38]	Low risk	Low risk	High risk	Unclear risk		Low risk	Low risk	Low risk		Low risk