Table 3.
PRS prediction accuracy for the Aβ PET case-control dataset using varying pT thresholds and APOE modeling methods
| pT | Aβ.PRS.full | Aβ.PRS.no.APOE | Aβ.PRS.1 (APOE4) | Aβ.PRS.2 (APOE4 + APOE2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N SNPs | AUC | N SNPs | AUC | AUC | AUC | |
| APOE4 | 1 | 0.687 | – | – | – | – |
| APOE2 + APOE4 | 2 | 0.716 | – | – | – | – |
| 1.0 × 10− 6 | 14 | 0.624 | 9 | 0.565 | 0.714 | 0.732 |
| 1.0 × 10− 5 | 41 | 0.641 | 36 | 0.506 | 0.716 | 0.735 |
| 1.0 × 10− 4 | 182 | 0.603 | 176 | 0.539 | 0.722 | 0.740 |
| 0.001 | 1144 | 0.571 | 1137 | 0.529 | 0.716 | 0.740 |
| 0.01 | 9,744 | 0.563 | 9,719 | 0.538 | 0.686 | 0.715 |
| 0.1 | 88,065 | 0.610 | 87,971 | 0.609 | 0.740 | 0.759 |