Abstract
Blastocystis sp. is one of the most common intestinal protozoan parasites of humans worldwide and often has genetic polymorphisms. Due to its high prevalence and the possibility of potential transmission to humans, this study was carried out to investigate the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and characterize its subtypes (genotypes) in southern Guizhou, China. A total of 548 fecal samples were collected from hospital patients for culture-based diagnosis. PCR products were sequenced and phylogenetically analyzed to identify subtypes and analyze their distribution. 43 positive cases of infection with Blastocystis sp. were detected, resulting in an overall prevalence of 7.85% (43/548). Seven subtypes were identified: ST3 (55.81%), ST1 (25.58%), ST7 (6.98%), ST5 (4.65%), ST2 (2.33%), ST4 (2.33%), and ST15 (2.33%). ST3 demonstrated the lowest intra-ST diversity, followed by ST1. Blastocystis sp. infection in southern Guizhou was caused by seven subtypes (ST1–ST5, ST7 and ST15) of the parasite, in which ST3 was the most common subtype, followed by ST1. The lowest intra-ST diversity of ST3 may be associated with substantial interhuman transmission in Guizhou. ST15 was found for the first time in humans, suggesting that it has the potential to be a zoonotic parasite. These findings have enhanced our understanding of the epidemiology and transmission of Blastocystis sp. in Southern Guizhou, China.
Keywords: Blastocystis sp., subtype, genotype, ST15
Introduction
Blastocystis sp. is an intestinal protozoan associated with various human diseases, including urticaria, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and ulcerative colitis [1]. However, its pathogenicity remains controversial and requires further investigation [2, 3]. This protozoan is among the most commonly identified parasites in human parasitological examinations, with a global distribution affecting an estimated 1–2 billion people worldwide [4]. Infection rates vary considerably between countries [5] and even within regions of the same country [6]. In humans, the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. ranges from 0.5% to 30% in industrialized countries and from 30% to 76%, reaching up to 100% in some developing regions [7]. The global disease burden of this infection is likely significantly underestimated. Blastocystis sp. exhibits abundant genetic polymorphisms. Currently, its subtypes are classified using a sequence-based system that analyzes the small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene [8]. This system has identified at least 44 subtypes (ST1–ST17, ST21, and ST23–ST48) [6, 9–11]. Of these, 16 subtypes—including ST1–ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16, ST23, ST35, and ST41—have been detected in humans [9]. The remaining subtypes have been identified only in non-human animal species and are considered to have limited or negligible zoonotic potential [12]. Among humans, ST1 to ST4 are the most common subtypes, while ST5–ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16, ST23, ST35, and ST41 are relatively uncommon to rare [12–16]. Notably, ST3 is the most prevalent subtype worldwide, with its highest prevalence observed in North America (52.9%), followed by Asia (50.5%), Africa (49.8%), Oceania (41.7%), South America (39.2%), and Europe (32.9%) [17]. In continental Europe and the U.K., ST4 is relatively common, but ST1 ranks as the second most prevalent subtype globally [15]. Interestingly, in some developing countries, including Iran, Libya, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Mexico, ST1 has been reported as the most common subtype [18–22]. In China, the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. infections varies significantly across regions. The lowest infection rate was reported in the Qinba Mountain Ecological Area (Henan) at 0.04% (3/6706), while the highest was observed in Bama Yao Autonomous County (Guangxi) at 43.26% (215/497) [23]. According to a 2015 survey on major zoonotic diseases in China, Guizhou Province recorded the highest infection rate, at 5.6%, using saline smear and sulfur staining methods. Located in southern China, Guizhou is economically underdeveloped, with a multiethnic population, a mild and humid climate, and widespread parasitic diseases. These factors may contribute to the relatively high prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in this region. Currently, knowledge of the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Guizhou Province remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to assess the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in the southern region of Guizhou and to compare these findings with data from other regions of China. The research seeks to enhance our understanding of the transmission risk factors associated with this parasite and provide valuable insights for its prevention and control.
Materials and methods
Sample collection and population description
The sample collection area, Guizhou Province, is located in the southwestern part of China and features a subtropical humid monsoon climate. Geographically, it spans longitudes 106∘07′ to 109∘35′ E and latitudes 25∘19′ to 27∘31′ N. The province has a total population of approximately 9.62 million, with an urban population of 6.65 million (69.1%) and a rural population of 2.97 million (30.9%). Guizhou is home to more than 40 ethnic minority groups, collectively comprising around 4.36 million individuals (45.3% of the population). Between July and August 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional study at The People’s Hospital of Qiannan in Duyun City, Guizhou Province. Using convenience sampling, we collected stool samples from 548 patients who presented for medical care and required stool examinations. Basic demographic information, including gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, and residential address, as well as clinical data related to gastrointestinal symptoms, urticaria, and IBS, were obtained through the hospital’s Information Management System. Of the participants, the majority (44.7%, 245/548) were residents of Duyun, while the rest originated from 13 additional counties in southern Guizhou. These included Dushan (76 individuals), Sandu (62), Fuquan (42), Pingtang (35), Wengan (33), Guiding (19), Libo (12), Luodian (7), Huishui (5), Changshun (4), Longli (4), Guiyang (2), and Danzhai (2) (Figure 1). Among these 548 patients, the male-to-female ratio was approximately 0.9:1 (259 males and 289 females). The patients were also grouped into four age classes: < 6 years old (n ═ 30), 6–17 years old (n ═ 22), 18–64 years old (n ═ 339) and >65 years old (n ═ 157). The median age of attendees was 55 years (range: 3 days–92 years). The patients were from 11 different ethnicities, of which the Han population accounted for 48.18% (264/548), the Miao population accounted for 9.31% (51/548), the Buyi population accounted for 28.83% (158/548), the Shui population accounted for 9.12% (50/548), and the other minorities population accounted for 4.56% (25/548). Among the patients, 41.06% (225/548) were peasants, and 58.94% (323/548) were nonpeasants. Based on their places of residence, 50.55% (277/548) live in rural areas, 13.00% (71/548) lived in townships and 36.45% (200/548) lived in urban area.
Figure 1.

The map of Guizhou illustrates the residential locations of the subjects participating in the investigation. The number of participants from each county or municipality is indicated within parentheses. Asterisk represents the locations of hospitals where collected.
Blastocystis cultivation and DNA extraction
All specimens were processed and examined in the parasitology laboratory at Qiannan Medical College for Nationalities. Stool examinations were conducted using culture in Locke-Egg-Serum (LES) medium, prepared through the following methods: Preparation of Normal Locke’s Solution: Dissolve the following components in 1000 mL of distilled water: 8 g of sodium chloride (NaCl), 0.2 g of calcium chloride (CaCl2), 0.2 g of potassium hydroxide (KOH), 0.021 g of magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2∙6H2O), 5.04 g of disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate (Na2HPO4∙12H2O), 0.4 g of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), and 0.3 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4). Sterilize the solution at 121 ∘C for 15 min at 15 psi. After cooling to room temperature, filter the solution through Whatman No. 1 filter paper to remove any precipitates, and then subject it to a second round of high-pressure sterilization. Preparation of Egg Complete Medium: Surface-sterilize fresh chicken eggs using 70% ethanol, then break them into a graduated cylinder. For every 45 mL of egg solution, add 12.5 mL of Locke’s solution. Homogenize the mixture using an ultrasonic bath at 900 W for 3-s intervals (3 s on, 3 s off) for a total duration of 12 min. Transfer 3 mL of the emulsified egg solution into a culture tube, positioning the tube at an angle of approximately 20 mm. Incubate the mixture at 70 ∘C for 1 h to allow solidification. After cooling to room temperature, sterilize the tube at 121 ∘C for 15 min under 15 psi. Store the prepared medium at 4 ∘C for future use. Preparation of LES Medium: To the prepared Locke’s solution, add 10% horse serum, 1000 U/mL of penicillin, 1000 µg/mL of streptomycin sulfate, and 2.5 µg/mL of amphotericin B. Ensure the Locke’s solution fully covers the surface of the egg complete medium (minimum 5 mL) to complete the preparation of the LES medium. Approximately 1 g of each fecal sample was inoculated into the prepared LES medium and cultivated in an anaerobic environment at 37 ∘C for 48 h. Iodine staining was used to microscopically observe the vacuolar forms of Blastocystis. Infection with Blastocystis was confirmed by identifying vacuolar forms under the microscope in the cultures. Positive Blastocystis specimens were centrifuged at 2000×g for 5 min in sterile PBS (pH 7.4) to wash the parasites twice. The parasites were then resuspended in 500 µL of PBS for further use.
PCR amplification
Blastocystis sp. was identified via PCR amplification of an approximately 600 bp region of the SSU-rDNA using the barcoding forward primer BhRDr (GAGCTTTTTAACTGCAACAACG) and the barcoding reverse primer RD5 (ATCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT) [24]. Each amplification was carried out in a 25-µL PCR mixture containing 12.5 µL of 2× Ex Taq™ Version 2.0 plus dye (Takara, Japan), 9.5 µL of deionized water, 1 µL of each primer (10 µM), and 1 µL of genomic DNA. A positive control (human-derived Blastocystis sp. ST3 DNA) and a negative control (distilled water without any DNA) were included in each PCR assay. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 ∘C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 ∘C for 40 s, annealing at 55 ∘C for 40 s, and extension at 72 ∘C for 1 min; followed by a final extension at 72 ∘C for 10 min. Two microliters of the PCR products were analyzed via 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the bands were identified based on the expected sizes.
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis
PCR amplification products were sequenced by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology Service Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The nucleotide sequences obtained in this study were analyzed using BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/), and reference sequences were downloaded from the GenBank database. Blastocystis sp. subtypes were identified through BLAST searches (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method in MEGA11 software, with evolutionary distances calculated via the Kimura two-parameter model. Bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results. The SSU rRNA sequences from the isolates were compared to all homologous sequences of the known Stentor genus ST using the BLAST on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) platform. MEGA11 was subsequently used to assess the diversity within STs and to identify the genotypes.
Ethical statement
All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qiannan Medical College for Nationalities (No. 2024024).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 17.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences in the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. among individuals of varying sexes, occupations, and home addresses were analyzed using the chi-squared test (χ2). Fisher’s exact test was applied to assess associations between Blastocystis sp. positivity and factors such as age and ethnicity. A two-sided P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Epidemiology and clinical characteristics
Out of 548 samples, 43 (7.85%) tested positive for Blastocystis sp. using LES medium culture. The prevalence was 9.27% (24/259) in male patients and 6.57% (19/289) in female patients. Age-specific prevalence rates were as follows: 18.18% (4/22) in children under 6 years old, 10.00% (3/30) in individuals aged 6–18 years, 7.64% (24/339) in those over 65 years, and 7.08% (12/157) in the 19–64 age group. By ethnic group, the prevalence was 5.68% (15/264) in the Han ethnic group, 9.80% (5/51) in the Hmong ethnic group, 9.49% (15/158) in the Buyei ethnic group, 12.00% (6/50) in the Shui ethnic group, and 8.00% (2/25) in other ethnic groups. Based on occupation, 7.56% (17/225) of peasants and 8.05% (26/323) of non-peasants tested positive. Regarding regions of residence, prevalence rates were 7.00% (14/200) in urban areas, 5.63% (4/71) in towns, and 9.03% (25/277) in rural areas. However, no significant correlations with sex (χ2 ═ 1.369, P ═ 0.242), age (Fisher’s exact test, χ2 ═ 3.850, P ═ 0.241), ethnicity (Fisher’s exact test, χ2 ═ 4.364, P ═ 0.338), occupation (χ2 ═ 1.211, P ═ 0.546) or home address (χ2 ═ 0.045, P ═ 0.832) were found (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of the population and of Blastocystis sp. positive patients stratified by gender, age classes, ethnic groups, occupations, home addresses and gastrointestinal symptoms
| Variable | Positive [n (%)] | Negative [n (%)] | χ2 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Man (n ═ 259) | 24 (9.27) | 235 (90.73) | 1.369 | 0.242 |
| Female (n ═ 289) | 19 (6.57) | 270 (93.43) | |||
| Age | 0∼ (n ═ 30) | 3 (10.00) | 27 (90.00) | 3.850* | 0.241* |
| 6∼ (n ═ 22) | 4 (18.18) | 18 (81.82) | |||
| 19∼ (n ═ 339) | 24 (7.08) | 315 (92.92) | |||
| 65∼ (n ═ 157) | 12 (7.64) | 145 (92.36) | |||
| Ethnicity | Han (n ═ 264) | 15 (5.68) | 249 (94.32) | 4.364* | 0.338* |
| Hmong (n ═ 51) | 5 (9.80) | 46 (90.20) | |||
| Bouyei (n ═ 158) | 15 (9.49) | 143 (90.51) | |||
| Shui (n ═ 50) | 6 (12.00) | 44 (88.00) | |||
| Others (n ═ 25) | 2 (8.00) | 23 (92.00) | |||
| Occupation | Peasants (n ═ 225) | 17 (7.56) | 208 (92.44) | 1.211 | 0.546 |
| Non-peasants (n ═ 323) | 26 (8.05) | 297 (91.95) | |||
| Home address | Urban (n ═ 200) | 14 (7.00) | 186 (93.00) | 0.045 | 0.532 |
| Town (n ═ 71) | 4 (5.63) | 67 (94.37) | |||
| Rural (n ═ 277) | 25 (9.03) | 252 (90.97) | |||
| Gastrointestinal symptoms | Infected (n ═ 43) | 3 (6.98) | 40 (93.02) | 1.911* | 0.158* |
| Non-infected (n ═ 505) | 11 (2.18) | 494 (97.82) |
* Fisher’s exact test.
We focused on gastrointestinal symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea, as well as urticaria and IBS. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in gastrointestinal symptoms between infected individuals (6.98%, 3/43) and non-infected individuals (2.18%, 11/505) (χ2 ═ 1.911, P ═ 0.158). None of the 548 patients in this study had urticaria or IBS.
Subtype distribution and phylogenetic analysis
The expected 620 bp fragments of SSU rDNA were successfully amplified and sequenced across all 43 samples. Sequencing identified infections caused by seven subtypes of the parasite: ST1–ST5, ST7, and ST15. Among these, ST3 was the dominant subtype, accounting for 55.81% (24/43) of the identified Blastocystis sp., followed by ST1 (25.58%, 11/43), ST7 (6.98%, 3/43), ST5 (4.65%, 2/43), ST2 (2.33%, 1/43), ST4 (2.33%, 1/43), and ST15 (2.33%, 1/43). Phylogenetic analysis, using the 43 sequences obtained in this study alongside eight reference subtype sequences from GenBank, demonstrated that the sequences clustered with their corresponding reference subtypes (ST1–ST5, ST7, and ST15) (Figure 2). The constructed phylogenetic tree showed that isolates of the same subtype grouped together with strong bootstrap support. To improve our understanding of Blastocystis sp. transmission among populations in the central and southern regions of Guizhou, partial SSU rDNA gene sequences from the identified subtypes were compared to evaluate diversity within each subtype. As illustrated in Figure 3, analysis of variable positions within each subtype alignment revealed three ST3 variants (ST3-1 to ST3-3), eight ST1 variants (ST1-1 to ST1-8), and two ST5 variants (ST5-1 to ST5-2). In contrast, only one variant was detected for ST2, ST7, and ST15 (ST2-1, ST7-1, and ST15-1, respectively). Notably, the entire variable region sequence of ST4 was identical to the reference gene, showing no detectable differences.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic relationships among SSU rDNA sequences of Blastocystis sp. isolated from the Guizhou population. SSU rDNA: Small-subunit ribosomal DNA.
Figure 3.
Alignment of partial SSU rRNA gene sequences from Blastocystis sp. ST1 (A), ST2 (B), ST3 (C), ST5 (D), ST7 (E), and ST15 (F) isolated from the Guizhou population. Variable nucleotide positions were indicated above the alignment (vertical numbering) in comparison to reference sequences [genotypes ST1-OQ456423, ST2-OP456440, ST3-MT645669, ST3-MT645665, ST5-1 (MN493729), ST7-MN658581, and ST15-MK801393]. Nucleotides identical to those of the reference sequences are represented by dots, and gaps are represented by asterisks. Genotypes identified within each ST are shown on the left side of the alignment. The total count and percentage of isolates of each genotype identified in our study are presented on the right side of the alignment. SSU rRNA: Small-subunit ribosomal RNA.
Discussion
Previous studies have confirmed that Blastocystis sp. infection rates are influenced by several factors, including demographic variations, geographical differences, host immunity, and diagnostic techniques [25–28]. These rates are generally higher in developing countries than in developed ones [29, 30] and more prevalent in warmer, wetter climates compared to colder, drier regions [31]. China, a vast country spanning 9.6 million square kilometers and home to 1.4 billion people, reports the presence of Blastocystis sp. across all regions. However, infection rates vary significantly due to differences in topography, climate, economic development, and sanitation across provinces [23]. NING et al. observed that Blastocystis sp. infections are more common in rural than urban areas, and protozoan infections are more frequent in southern than northern China [32]. Epidemiological surveys reveal a wide range of prevalence among different populations, from 0.007% to 48.6% [23]. In the current study, the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. infection among hospital patients in southern Guizhou was 7.85%, higher than in Shanghai (3.70%) [32] and Heilongjiang (2.4%) [1] but lower than in Guangxi (16.27%–36.6%) [32], Yunnan (9.47%) [32], and Chongqing (10.61%) [1]. Statistical analyses using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests revealed that the prevalence varies by age, gender, occupation, and ethnicity. Blastocystis sp., a protozoan found in the gut, spreads via the fecal-oral route, often through ingestion of contaminated food or water [33]. However, associations between infection and demographic factors, such as age, gender, occupation, and ethnicity remain debated [34]. While some studies show no significant correlations [35–37], others suggest potential associations [38–40]. Overall, there is growing consensus linking infection risk to parasitic exposure. Common risk factors for Blastocystis sp. infection include pet ownership, poor hygiene, and consumption of non-sterile drinking water [41–45]. The pathogenicity of Blastocystis sp. in humans is controversial [46–48]. Some studies indicate no association between infection and gastrointestinal symptoms [49, 50], while others suggest it as a potential risk factor [51, 52]. Additionally, certain studies link Blastocystis sp. to urticaria [53, 54] and IBS [55, 56]. However, our findings revealed no relationship between Blastocystis sp. infection and gastrointestinal symptoms. Moreover, since none of the 548 participants reported urticaria or IBS, we could not assess potential correlations between Blastocystis sp. infection and these conditions.
Eleven provinces in China—Yunnan, Guangxi, Chongqing, Xinjiang, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Hebei, Henan, Hainan, and Heilongjiang—have reported cases of Blastocystis sp. infections in humans, with geographic variations in the distribution of different subtypes [1, 57–59]. To date, 16 subtypes of Blastocystis sp. (ST1–ST10, ST12–ST14, ST17, and ST21) have been identified in China, although only eight of these (ST1–ST7 and ST12) have been detected in the Chinese population [57]. Among these, ST3 and ST1 are the most common, while ST2, ST4, ST5, ST6, ST7, and ST12 are rarely observed [23, 32, 57]. This study identified seven subtypes (ST1–ST5, ST7, and ST15) in the southern region of Guizhou Province. Notably, ST6 and ST12, which were previously reported in China, were not detected. Unexpectedly, we identified a strain classified as ST15 (PP554656) in one patient—marking the first documented case of this subtype in humans, both in China and globally. Previously, ST15 was regarded as a nonhuman subtype, typically found in animals such as domestic pigs (Sus domesticus) and wild boars (Sus scrofa), with ruminants also serving as important hosts [25, 60–62]. Upon reviewing the patient’s case history, we found that they were a local resident of Guizhou Province with no gastrointestinal symptoms at the time of the medical visit, although they had prior contact with chickens, sheep, and other livestock. This case highlights the need for further investigation to determine the potential zoonotic risk of ST15.ST3 and ST1 have consistently been identified as the dominant subtypes in the Chinese population, with ST3 being the most prevalent [23, 57]. In our study, ST3 and ST1 accounted for 55.81% (24/43) and 25.58% (11/43) of cases, respectively, closely aligning with findings from other Chinese provinces. While the distribution of ST3 and ST1 in Guizhou mirrors that of provinces like Heilongjiang, Xinjiang, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, and Shanghai, limited sample sizes and collection areas make it premature to conclude that ST3 is the predominant subtype. Additionally, ongoing debates persist regarding whether ST1 or ST3 is more common in neighboring Guangxi and Yunnan [23, 57, 58, 63–65].
An evaluation of subtype diversity revealed that the 24 ST3 isolates in our study belonged to three genotypes, resulting in an average of 8 isolates per genotype. For ST1, 11 isolates were distributed across 8 genotypes, yielding an average of 1.4 isolates per genotype. The remaining subtypes displayed an average of 1 isolate per genotype. This inverse relationship between intra-subtype variability and the number of isolates per genotype indicates that ST3 exhibits the lowest intra-subtype diversity. Interestingly, ST3 is not commonly found in domestic animals, and its low genetic variability may be associated with ongoing person-to-person transmission within the Guizhou population. In contrast, ST1 exhibits higher genetic diversity, with multiple genotypes identified in animal hosts. This suggests that certain ST1 genotypes may be widely disseminated among populations through environmental contamination involving feces from various hosts.
In our study, we identified genotypes ST2, ST4, ST5, and ST7, which collectively accounted for approximately 16% of the total isolates. Among these, ST2 is reported as the second most prevalent genotype in multiple studies [19, 21, 35, 38, 66]. Molecular epidemiological surveys of Blastocystis sp. in individuals from China indicate the presence of ST2 in most provinces, although the proportion is relatively low, except in Hebei Province, where it accounts for 99.74% of cases (389/390) [67]. Consistent with findings from other studies in China, we identified only one ST2 isolate in our study (2.33%, 1/43). The geographic distribution of the ST4 subtype is primarily restricted to Europe [68], with only a few reports from other regions [14]. In our study, we identified a single ST4 isolate (2.33%, 1/43), which aligns with previous findings from studies conducted in China [23, 57]. We also identified two ST5 isolates among the 43 strains. A review of the published literature indicates that ST5 is rarely observed in the Chinese population, with documented cases only in Jiangxi Province (5.77%, 3/52) and Hebei Province (0.26%, 1/390) [57]. Globally, ST5 is also uncommon in humans [69], as it is primarily associated with animal hosts, such as pigs and sheep [70]. However, the potential for zoonotic transmission between humans and animals should not be overlooked. In rural Guizhou, pig farming is predominantly intensive, with centralized management practices. However, pig pens are often located in close proximity to residences. Additionally, in some areas, traditional free-range practices still exist, with farmers allowing pigs to roam in backyards or surrounding forests. These practices can pose significant risk factors for the transmission of ST5. Another relatively rare subtype identified in our study was ST7, with a frequency of 6.98% (3/43). This subtype is primarily found in avian species [32, 69, 70], with only a few reports documenting its prevalence in regional human populations [59]. Guizhou, as one of the most biodiverse regions in China, hosts a wealth of avian resources. It serves as an important migratory route for birds and provides critical habitats for nesting and breeding through its natural reserves and wetlands. With the growth of ecotourism and increasing interest in birdwatching, the potential role of birds in the transmission of Blastocystis sp. warrants further consideration.
Conclusion
Blastocystis sp. is a common human intestinal parasite in southern Guizhou. Infection in this region is caused by seven subtypes (ST1–ST5, ST7, and ST15), with ST3 being the most prevalent subtype, followed by ST1. ST3 exhibits the lowest intra-subtype diversity, which may be linked to ongoing interhuman transmission in Guizhou. In contrast, the higher number of ST1 genotypes suggests widespread dissemination among populations through environmental contamination with feces from various hosts. Notably, this study identified ST15 in humans for the first time, indicating its potential as a zoonotic parasite. Further surveys on the prevalence and genotype distribution of Blastocystis sp., encompassing individuals from diverse occupations, ethnic groups, and socioeconomic backgrounds, alongside an expanded sample size and representative populations, could provide a stronger scientific foundation for preventing and controlling emerging protozoan diseases in humans.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: Authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding: This work was supported by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, China [grant number 202126]; the Science and Technology Fund Project of Guizhou Provincial Health Commission, China [grant number 1210RJIA006]; the Scientific Research Fund of Qiannan Medical College for Nationalites, China [grant number 201001, 201818] and the Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81760370].
Data Availability
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
References
- 1.Li J, Dong H, Karim MR, Yang X, Chao L, Liu S, et al. Molecular identification and subtyping of Blastocystis sp. in hospital patients in Central China. Eur J Protistol. 2021;79:125796. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2021.125796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2021.125796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kumarasamy V, Rajamanikam A. Systematic review and meta-analysis: epidemiology of human Blastocystis spp. Infect Malaysia. 2023;8(8):415. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8080415. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8080415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dashti A, Alonso H. Evaluation of the use of singleplex and duplex CerTest VIASURE real-time PCR assays to detect common intestinal protist parasites. Diagnostics. 2024;14(3):319. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030319. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14030319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Heydarian M, Manouchehri Naeini K, Kheiri S, Abdizadeh R. Prevalence and subtyping of Blastocystis sp. in ruminants in Southwestern, Iran. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):20254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70907-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70907-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fusaro C, Bernal JE, Baldiris-Ávila R, González-Cuello R, Cisneros-Lorduy J, Reales-Ruiz A, et al. Molecular prevalence and subtypes distribution of Blastocystis spp. in humans of Latin America: a systematic review. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024;9(2):38. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed9020038. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9020038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tan KS. New insights on classification, identification, and clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(4):639–65. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00022-08. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00022-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Audebert C, Even G, Cian A, Loywick A, Merlin S, Viscogliosi E, et al. Colonization with the enteric protozoa Blastocystis is associated with increased diversity of human gut bacterial microbiota. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25255. doi: 10.1038/srep25255. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Pre-empting Pandora’s box: blastocystis subtypes revisited. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(3):229–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hernández-Castro C, Maloney JG. Identification and validation of novel Blastocystis subtype ST41 in a Colombian patient undergoing colorectal cancer screening. J Eukaryot Microbio. 2023;70(5):e12978. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12978. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Koehler AV, Herath H, Hall RS, Wilcox S, Gasser RB. Marked genetic diversity within Blastocystis in Australian wildlife revealed using a next generation sequencing-phylogenetic approach. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildlife. 2024;23:100902. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Šejnohová A, Koutenská M, Jirků M, Brožová K, Pavlíčková Z, Kadlecová O, et al. A cross-sectional survey of Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis in non-human primates and their caregivers in Czech zoos. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2024;19:100862. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maloney JG, Molokin A, Seguí R, Maravilla P, Martínez-Hernández F, Villalobos G, et al. Identification and molecular characterization of four new blastocystis subtypes designated ST35–ST38. Microorganisms. 2022;11(1):46. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010046. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rudzińska M, Sikorska K. Epidemiology of blastocystis infection: a review of data from Poland in relation to other reports. Pathogens. 2023;12(8):1050. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12081050. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stensvold CR, Tan KSW, Clark CG. Blastocystis. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(3):315–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Popruk S, Adao DEV, Rivera WL. Epidemiology and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in humans: a review. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;95:105085. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhao W, Ren G, Wang L, Xie L, Wang J, Mao J, et al. Molecular prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis spp.among children who have diarrheia or are asymptomatic in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Parasite. 2024;31:12. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2024012. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2024012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang FQ, Wang P, Feng X, Mi QM, Mei XF, Zhang ZC, et al. [Progress of researches on global prevalence of Blastocystis hominis human infections and its subtypes] Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2020;33(1):84–94. doi: 10.16250/j.32.1374.2020083. https://doi.org/10.16250/j.32.1374.2020083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Delshad A, Saraei M, Alizadeh SA, Niaraki SR, Alipour M, Hosseinbigi B, et al. Distribution and molecular analysis of Blastocystis subtypes from gastrointestinal symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Iran. Afr Health Sci. 2020;20(3):1179–89. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i3.21. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v20i3.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Abdulsalam AM, Ithoi I, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Al-Mekhlafi AM, Ahmed A, Surin J. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates in Sebha, Libya. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cinek O, Polackova K, Odeh R, Alassaf A, Kramná L, Ibekwe MU, et al. Blastocystis in the faeces of children from six distant countries: prevalence, quantity, subtypes and the relation to the gut bacteriome. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04859-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04859-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Forsell J, Granlund M, Samuelsson L, Koskiniemi S, Edebro H, Evengård B. High occurrence of Blastocystis sp. subtypes 1-3 and Giardia intestinalis assemblage B among patients in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1637-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1637-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hidalgo-Gonzalez LA, Salgado-Lopez J, Pineda-Rodriguez SA, Martinez A, Romero-Valdovinos M, Martinez-Hernandez F, et al. Identification of Blastocystis sp. in school children from a rural Mexican village: subtypes and risk factors analysis. Parasitol Res. 2023;122(7):1701–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-023-07872-w. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07872-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ning CQ, Hu ZH, Chen JH, Ai L, Tian LG. Epidemiology of Blastocystis infection from 1990 to 2019 in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00779-z. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00779-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Scicluna SM, Tawari B, Clark CG. DNA barcoding of blastocystis. Protist. 2006;157(1):77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2005.12.001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rauff-Adedotun AA, Lee IL. Prevalence, potential risk factors and genetic diversity of Blastocystis in ruminant livestock animals from Penang, Malaysia. Parasitol Res. 2023;122(9):2193–205. doi: 10.1007/s00436-023-07920-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07920-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Noradilah SA, Moktar N, Anuar TS, Lee IL, Salleh FM, Manap S, et al. Molecular epidemiology of blastocystosis in Malaysia: does seasonal variation play an important role in determining the distribution and risk factors of Blastocystis subtype infections in the Aboriginal community? Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2294-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2294-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yersal O, Malatyali E, Ertabaklar H, Oktay E, Barutca S, Ertug S. Blastocystis subtypes in cancer patients: Analysis of possible risk factors and clinical characteristics. Parasitol Int. 2016;65(6 Pt B):792–6. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2016.02.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Javanmard E, Niyyati M, Ghasemi E, Mirjalali H, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Zali MR. Impacts of human development index and climate conditions on prevalence of Blastocystis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Trop. 2018;185:193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.05.014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fusaro C, Bernal JE, Baldiris-Ávila R, González-Cuello R. Molecular prevalence and subtypes distribution of Blastocystis spp. in humans of Latin America: a systematic review. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024;9(2):38. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed9020038. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9020038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Attah AO, Sanggari A, Li LI, Nik Him N, Ismail AH, Meor Termizi FH. Blastocystis occurrence in water sources worldwide from 2005 to 2022: a review. Parasit Res. 2023;122(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07731-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07731-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Eroglu F, Koltas IS. Evaluation of the transmission mode of B. hominis by using PCR method. Parasitol Res. 2010;107(4):841–5. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1937-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1937-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ning CQ, Ai L, Hu ZH, Chen JH, Tian LG. [Progress of researches on Blastocystis infections in humans and animals in China] Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2020;33(1):95–101. doi: 10.16250/j.32.1374.2020101. https://doi.org/10.16250/j.32.1374.2020101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jinatham V, Maxamhud S, Popluechai S, Tsaousis AD, Gentekaki E. Blastocystis one health approach in a rural community of Northern Thailand: prevalence, subtypes and novel transmission routes. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:746340. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.746340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.746340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Al FD, Hökelek M. Is Blastocystis hominis an opportunist agent? Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2007;31(1):28–36. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17471409/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Seyer A, Karasartova D, Ruh E, Güreser AS, Turgal E, Imir T, et al. Epidemiology and prevalence of Blastocystis spp. in North Cyprus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96(5):1164–70. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0706. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cabrine-Santos M, Cintra Edo N, do Carmo RA, Nascentes GA, Pedrosa AL, Correia D, et al. OCCURRENCE OF Blastocystis spp. IN UBERABA, MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2015;57(3):211–4. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652015000300005. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652015000300005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.AbuOdeh R, Ezzedine S, Samie A, Stensvold CR, ElBakri A. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in healthy individuals in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;37:158–62. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.11.021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lepczyńska M, Dzika E, Chen W. Prevalence of Blastocystis subtypes in healthy volunteers in Northeastern Poland. J Parasitol. 2021;107(5):684–8. doi: 10.1645/20-170. https://doi.org/10.1645/20-170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Marangi M, Boughattas S, De Nittis R, Pisanelli D, Delli Carri V, Lipsi MR, et al. Prevalence and genetic diversity of Blastocystis sp. among autochthonous and immigrant patients in Italy. Microb Pathog. 2023;185:106377. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Salazar-Sánchez RS, Ascuña-Durand K, Ballón-Echegaray J, Vásquez-Huerta V, Martínez-Barrios E, Castillo-Neyra R. Socio-demographic determinants associated with Blastocystis Infection in Arequipa, Peru. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 2020;104(2):700–7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0631. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Belleza ML, Cadacio JL, Borja MP, Solon JA, Padilla MA, Tongol-Rivera PN, et al. Epidemiologic study of Blastocystis infection in an Urban community in the Philippines. J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:894297. doi: 10.1155/2015/894297. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/894297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Duda A, Stenzel DJ, Boreham PF. Detection of Blastocystis sp. in domestic dogs and cats. Vet Parasitol. 1998;76(1–2):9–17. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00224-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Anuar TS, Ghani MK, Azreen SN, Salleh FM, Moktar N. Blastocystis infection in Malaysia: evidence of waterborne and human-to-human transmissions among the Proto-Malay, Negrito and Senoi tribes of Orang Asli. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:40. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Abdulsalam AM, Ithoi I, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Ahmed A, Surin J, Mak JW. Drinking water is a significant predictor of Blastocystis infection among rural Malaysian primary schoolchildren. Parasitology. 2012;139(8):1014–20. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012000340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Quihui L, Valencia ME, Crompton DW, Phillips S, Hagan P, Morales G, et al. Role of the employment status and education of mothers in the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Mexican rural schoolchildren. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:225. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-225. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Stensvold CR, Nielsen HV, Mølbak K, Smith HV. Pursuing the clinical significance of Blastocystis–diagnostic limitations. Trends Parasitol. 2009;25(1):23–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2008.09.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2008.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aykur M, Camyar A, Türk BG, Sin AZ, Dagci H. Evaluation of association with subtypes and alleles of Blastocystis with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Acta Tropica. 2022;231:106455. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Seijas-Pereda L, Köster PC, Dashti A, Bailo B, Guadano-Procesi I, Rescalvo-Casas C, et al. Intragenomic diversity of the small subunit rDNA gene shows limited impact on the pathogenicity of Blastocystis infection in clinical patients. Microbes Infect. 2024;2024:105422. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rudzińska M, Kowalewska B, Waż P, Sikorska K, Szostakowska B. Blastocystis subtypes isolated from travelers and non-travelers from the north of Poland—a single center study. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;75:103926. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Alinaghizade A, Mirjalali H, Mohebali M, Stensvold CR, Rezaeian M. Inter- and intra-subtype variation of Blastocystis subtypes isolated from diarrheic and non-diarrheic patients in Iran. Infect Genet Evol. 2017;50:77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.02.016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.El Safadi D, Meloni D, Poirier P, Osman M, Cian A, Gaayeb L, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis in Lebanon and correlation between subtype 1 and gastrointestinal symptoms. Am J Tropical Med Hygiene. 2013;88(6):1203–6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0777. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Moosavi A, Haghighi A, Mojarad EN, Zayeri F, Alebouyeh M, Khazan H, et al. Genetic variability of Blastocystis sp. isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Iran. Parasitol Res. 2012;111(6):2311–5. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3085-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3085-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gandomkar M, Fouladvand M, Malekizadeh H, Rayani M, Ahmadi B, Shadvar N, et al. Prevalence of Blastocystis in patients referred to Bushehr medical centers and its relationship with Urticaria. Turkiye Parazitolojii Dergisi. 2024;48(2):77–81. doi: 10.4274/tpd.galenos.2024.44366. https://doi.org/10.4274/tpd.galenos.2024.44366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bahrami F, Babaei E, Badirzadeh A, Riabi TR, Abdoli A. Blastocystis, urticaria, and skin disorders: review of the current evidences. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(6):1027–42. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03793-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03793-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Coyle CM, Varughese J, Weiss LM, Tanowitz HB. Blastocystis: to treat or not to treat. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(1):105–10. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir810. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bálint A, Dóczi I, Bereczki L, Gyulai R, Szűcs M, Farkas K, et al. Do not forget the stool examination!–cutaneous and gastrointestinal manifestations of Blastocystis sp. infection. Parasitol Res. 2014;113(4):1585–90. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3805-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-3805-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu L-K, Wang P-L, Han H, Wang R-J, Jian F-C. Current status of Blastocystis infection in China. Chin J Zoonoses. 2021;37:548–55. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2021.00.049. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Qi M, Wei Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Li J, Zhang L, et al. Genetic diversity of Blastocystis in kindergarten children in southern Xinjiang, China. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-3890-0. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3890-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Qiang Y, Yu Y-J, Ren G-X, Li J-Q. Molecular genetic characterization of Blastocystis in primary and middle school students in Baisha Li Autonomous County, Hainan. China Tropical Med. 2022;22:909–12. https://doi.org/10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2022.10.04. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Asghari A, Sadrebazzaz A, Shamsi L, Shams M. Global prevalence, subtypes distribution, zoonotic potential, and associated risk factors of Blastocystis sp. in domestic pigs (Sus domesticus) and wild boars (Sus scrofa): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog. 2021;160:105183. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shams M, Asghari A. Blastocystis sp. in Small ruminants: a universal systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Parasitologica. 2022;67(3):1073–85. doi: 10.1007/s11686-022-00589-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-022-00589-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Asghari A, Yousefi A, Badali R, Mohammadi MR, Shamsi L, Maleki F, et al. First molecular subtyping and zoonotic significance of Blastocystis sp. in Dromedary (C. dromedarius) and Bactrian (C. bactrianus) camels in Iran: a molecular epidemiology and review of available literature. Vet Med Sci. 2024;10(3):e1442. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1442. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Deng Y, Zhang S, Ning C, Zhou Y, Teng X, Wu X, et al. Molecular epidemiology and risk factors of Blastocystis sp. infections among general populations in Yunnan Province, Southwestern China. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:1791–801. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S269664. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S269664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang S, Tian L, Lu Y, Li L, Chen J, Zhou X. Epidemiological characteristics of Blastocystis hominis in urban region, southwestern China. Zhongguo Ren Shou Gong Huan Bing Za Zhi. 2016;32:424–8. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2016.05.002. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xu N, Jiang Z, Liu H, Jiang Y, Wang Z, Zhou D, et al. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Blastocystis hominis and Cystoisospora belli in HIV/AIDS patients in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15904. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94962-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94962-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gureser AS, Karasartova D, Sarzhanov F, Kosar N, Taylan-Ozkan A, Dogruman-Al F. Prevalence of Blastocystis and Dientamoeba fragilis in diarrheal patients in Corum, Türkiye. Parasitol Res. 2023;122(12):2977–87. doi: 10.1007/s00436-023-07987-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07987-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ma L, Qiao H, Wang H, Li S, Zhai P, Huang J, et al. Molecular prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis sp. in primates in northern China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020;67(6):2789–96. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13644. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Skotarczak B. Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of Blastocystis. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018;25(3):411–6. doi: 10.26444/aaem/81315. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/81315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Jiménez PA, Jaimes JE, Ramírez JD. A summary of Blastocystis subtypes in North and South America. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3641-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3641-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rauff-Adedotun AA, Meor Termizi FH, Shaari N, Lee IL. The coexistence of Blastocystis spp. in humans, animals and environmental sources from 2010–2021 in Asia. Biology (Basel) 2021;10(10):990. doi: 10.3390/biology10100990. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10100990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.


