Skip to main content
. 2025 May 9;16:1554203. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1554203

Table 3.

Comparison of features of renal Anastomosing Hemangiomas between patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and patients without ESRD.

All patients (n=100) With ESRD (n=46) Without ESRD (n=54) p
Age (Mean ± SD) 50.32 ± 16.96 44.34 ± 14.73 55.41 ± 17.19 0.001
Gender (n, %)
 Female 32 (32.0%) 16 (34.8%) 16 (29.6%) 0.582
 Male 68 (68.0%) 30 (65.2%) 38 (70.5%)
Clinical Manifestation (n, %)
 Absent 83 (83.0%) 40 (87.0%) 43 (79.6%) 0.363
 Present 17 (17.0%) 6 (13.0%) 11 (20.4%)
Site (n, %)
 Left 40 (40.0%) 13 (28.3%) 27 (50.0%) <0.001
 Right 31 (31.0%) 11 (23.9%) 20 (37.0%)
 Bilateral 11 (11.0%) 11 (23.9%) 0 (0.0%)
 Unknown 18 (18.0%) 11 (23.9%) 7 (13.0%)
Location (n, %)
 Renal cortex 5 (5.0%) 2 (4.3%) 3 (5.6%) 0.943
 Renal sinus/hilus/medulla 35 (35.0%) 15 (32.6%) 20 (37.0%)
 Renal sinus/hilus/medulla and cortex 11 (11.0%) 5 (10.9%) 6 (11.1%)
 Unknown 49 (49.0%) 24 (52.2%) 25 (46.3%)
Focality (n, %)
 Unifocal 61 (61.0%) 19 (41.3%) 42(77.8%) <0.001
 Multifocal 25 (25.0%) 23 (50.0%) 2 (3.7%)
 Unknown 14 (14.0%) 4 (8.7%) 10 (18.5%)
Largest Tumor Diameter (mm) (n=81) 24.72 ± 22.31 16.79 ± 13.62 33.26 ± 26.51 0.001
Preoperative misdiagnosis (n=21) 21 (100.0%) 5 (23.8%) 16 (76.2%)
Surgery approach (n, %) (n=91)
 Partial nephrectomy 20 (22.0%) 2 (4.5%) 18 (38.3%) <0.001
 Radical nephrectomy 71 (78.0%) 42 (95.5%) 29 (61.7%)
Cooccurrence/History of other renal tumors (n=24) 24 (100.0%) 18 (75.0%) 6 (25.0%)

Significant values are in bold.