ABSTRACT
The global increase in the aging population has led to a concurrent rise in the incidence of age‐related diseases, posing substantial challenges to healthcare systems and affecting the well‐being of the elderly. Identifying and securing effective treatments has become an urgent priority. In this context, mesenchymal stem cell‐derived exosomes (MSC‐Exos) have emerged as a promising and innovative modality in the field of anti‐aging medicine, offering a multifaceted therapeutic approach. MSC‐Exos demonstrate significant potential due to their immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory properties, their ability to inhibit oxidative stress, and their reparative effects on senescent tissues. These attributes make them valuable in combating a range of conditions associated with aging, such as cardiovascular diseases, neurodegeneration, skin aging, and osteoarthritis. The integration of exosomes with membrane‐penetrating peptides introduces a novel strategy for the delivery of biomolecules, surmounting traditional cellular barriers and enhancing therapeutic efficacy. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the current understanding of MSC‐Exos, underscoring their role as a novel and potent therapeutic strategy against the intricate challenges of age‐related diseases.
Keywords: exosome, immunomodulatory, mesenchymal stem cell, senescence, tissue regeneration
Mechanisms of MSC‐Exos in the treatment of age‐related diseases. A Immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory, MSC‐Exos mediate immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory effects by regulating the polarisation of T cells and macrophages, promoting an anti‐inflammatory state while inhibiting pro‐inflammatory responses; B Suppression of oxidative stress, MSC‐Exos mitigate oxidative stress by activating cellular antioxidant defence mechanisms, including NRF2/ARE signalling pathway. Through the upregulation of antioxidant enzymes (e.g., SOD, GPx), MSC‐Exos facilitate the reduction of ROS and prevent autophagy oxidative DNA damage, thereby inhibiting pathways associated with tumour progression and cellular senescence; C Promotion of cell migration and proliferation, MSC‐Exos activate the PI3K/AKt/mTOR signalling pathways by PTEN to promotion protein synthesis, cell growth, and cell proliferation; D Remodelling of the aging microenvironment, MSC‐Exos regulate the aging microenvironment by modulating the expression of inflammatory and anti‐inflammatory factors within the SASP. Through the suppression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, MSC‐Exos alleviate age‐related inflammation and mitigate cellular aging processes that are exacerbated under stress conditions.

1. Introduction
As the global population ages, the morbidity and mortality rates of age‐related diseases are increasing, posing a great challenge to the public health system. Aging is a complex biological process involving multiple cellular and molecular mechanisms, including DNA damage, oxidative stress, cellular senescence, and tissue dysfunction [1]. Together, these processes lead to the development of a variety of diseases, such as cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, which pose a serious threat to human health and quality of life. Therefore, exploring and researching therapeutic approaches for these diseases has become a top priority. In recent years, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their exosomes have attracted much attention in anti‐aging therapy, providing new insights and avenues for treating age‐related diseases.
MSCs are characterised as a population of multipotent stromal progenitor cells that have the ability to adhere to plastic and exhibit fibroblast‐like, express surface antigens, including CD105, CD90, and CD73, and differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondroblasts in vitro [2, 3]. As with other stem cells, MSCs exhibit self‐renewal and robust proliferative capabilities [4, 5]. However, recent studies indicate that the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs is not solely attributed to their pluripotency, and relying exclusively on their differentiation into tissues or organs for repair or therapy is currently impractical [6]. In contrast, their primary therapeutic role appears to be mediated through the paracrine release of bioactive molecules that modulate the microenvironment and activate endogenous tissue‐specific stem cells [7, 8, 9]. Notably, exosomes are pivotal in mediating the paracrine effects of MSCs, acting as intercellular messengers that transport bioactive molecules from MSCs to target damaged cells, thereby promoting cell survival, proliferation, and tissue repair, and holding promise for clinical applications [8, 9].
Exosomes, minute extracellular vesicles with diameters spanning from 30 to 150 nm [10], encapsulate a diverse cargo comprising proteins such as tetraspanins and heat shock proteins, lipids including sphingomyelin and cholesterol, as well as genetic material and small molecule metabolites that reflect the unique signature of the donor cells [11, 12]. These exosomes can deliver their bioactive cargo to target cells through various mechanisms, including fusion, endocytosis, and membrane fusion, thereby influencing the physiological functions of the recipient cells [13]. In recent years, the application of mesenchymal stem cell‐derived exosomes (MSC‐Exos) in anti‐aging research has garnered significant attention. For instance, several studies have demonstrated that MSC‐Exos can effectively decelerate skin aging, stimulate fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis, and mitigate inflammatory responses [14]. Moreover, MSC‐Exos plays a pivotal role in regulating cardiomyocyte function and promoting tissue repair post‐injury, which holds immense potential in treating age‐related cardiovascular diseases [15]. These findings not only strengthen the experimental foundation for the utilisation of MSC‐Exos in anti‐aging applications but also pave the way for novel research directions and innovative ideas.
When compared to MSCs, MSC‐Exos exhibit several advantages in clinical applications (Figure 1). Notably, they possess superior resilience to freeze–thaw injury and maintain high stability in vivo [16, 17]. Additionally, their non‐replicative nature eliminates the tumorigenic risk associated with MSCs [16, 18]. Moreover, their low immunogenicity and ability to traverse the blood–brain barrier position them as formidable candidates in anti‐aging therapeutics [19, 20]. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the application of MSC‐Exos in age‐related diseases, delving into their mechanism of action, therapeutic effects, and future research directions. By thoroughly analysing and summarising existing studies, we aspire to offer valuable references and insights that can guide future research and foster the application and advancement of MSC‐Exos in the field of anti‐aging.
FIGURE 1.

The production process of MSC‐Exos and characteristics of MSCs and MSC‐Exos. MSC‐Exos formation involves a series of steps including the endocytosis that leads to the generation of early sorting endosomes, the maturation into late sorting endosomes, the formation of multivesicular bodies, and the eventual release of exosomes. Limitations of MSCs included heterogeneity, stability of stem cell pluripotency and differentiation capacities, immunocompatibility, and complex effective components compared to MSCs, Four major advantages of MSC‐Exos are low immunogenicity, ability to cross the blood–brain barrier, resistance to freeze–thaw damage, and immunomodulatory effects, which can make exosomes promising candidates for therapeutic interventions in various diseases.
2. Biogenesis, Mechanism of Action, and Tissue Origin of Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes
Exosome biogenesis is a multistage cellular process that encompasses the formation of early endosomes to the release of mature exosomes (Figure 1). The exosome biogenesis begins with the cell membrane invagination, forming early sorting endosomes (ESE). These ESE mature into late‐sorting endosomes (LSE), undergoing morphological changes that include the formation of intraluminal vesicles (ILVs), which contain biomolecules from the parent cell. ILV formation is tightly regulated, particularly by the ESCRT complex. LSE then becomes a multivesicular body (MVB), encapsulating ILVs, and finally fuses with the cell membrane to release ILVs as exosomes into the extracellular space [21, 22, 23, 24]. During this biogenesis process, the main biomarkers inherited by exosomes include the tetraspanin family proteins such as CD63, CD81 and CD9, which are often used as consistent exosome markers and play crucial roles in facilitating the sorting of protein cargoes into exosomes [24]. Additionally, exosomes are known to contain heat shock proteins (HSPs), such as HSP70 and HSP90, which are involved in protein folding and stabilisation [24]. During the preparation and isolation of exosomes, it is customary to rely on size determination and the recognition of biomarkers to distinguish them from two other types of extracellular vesicles, including microvesicles and apoptotic bodies. In contrast, Microvesicles, are larger than exosomes and derived from the plasma membrane's outward budding. They are rich in membrane‐associated proteins like integrins and selectins, which play roles in cell adhesion and signalling [25]. Apoptotic bodies, formed during cell death, are the biggest one and contain organelles and DNA fragments [26]. They are identified by phosphatidylserine on their surface, which Annexin V can bind to, and may also be marked by thrombospondin and the complement protein C3b [25, 27]. At present, methods including differential centrifugation, precipitation, flushing separation, ultrafiltration, antibody affinity capture, microfluidic separation and mass spectrometry (MS) can be used to effectively isolate and prepare exosomes [28]. Regarding the storage of MSC‐Exos, the current consensus is that they can be temporarily preserved at 4°C for short‐term durations (1 day to several weeks), while long‐term storage requirements (several months to years) are best met by cryopreservation at ultra‐low temperatures of −80°C [17]. Compared to MSCs, MSC‐Exos exhibit remarkable resistance to freeze–thaw cycles. This enhanced stability throughout the freeze–thaw process renders MSC‐Exos more suitable for clinical applications and storage [16].
As key mediators of intercellular communication, exosomes employ diverse and intricate mechanisms of action. These nanoscale vesicles can facilitate information transfer via direct binding of ligands on their membrane surface to receptors on target cells, or through membrane fusion with the target cell membrane. Additionally, exosomes release intracellular signalling molecules that bind directly to target cells, modulating their biological functions accordingly (Figure 2). Table 1 and Table 2 provide a comprehensive overview of the various mechanisms of action exhibited by MSC‐Exos derived from perinatal tissue and adult tissue sources, respectively. The nucleic acids, particularly microRNAs (miRNA) and long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNA), as well as proteins like 14–3‐3ζ proteins, that are harboured within these exosomes, play pivotal roles in disease therapeutics. Among these, miRNAs stand out as particularly significant players, as they are encapsulated within exosomes and function as molecular messengers, transmitting genetic information to recipient cells via cell‐to‐cell transfer, ultimately influencing gene expression and biological functions of the target cells. A range of studies has illuminated the crucial role of miRNAs in MSC‐Exos, particularly in facilitating intercellular communication and regulating biological functions. For example, the hUCMSC‐Exos derived miR‐335‐5p was found to mitigate inflammation in HK‐2 cells by downregulating TGF‐β1‐induced ADAM19 protein levels [29]. Additionally, miR‐133b derived from hUCMSC‐Exos augmented proliferation, cell cycle progression, migration, and invasion, while inhibiting apoptosis in HTR8‐S/Vneo and HPT‐8 cells [30]. pTEN, an oncogene, encodes proteins with phosphodiesterase activity that normally inhibit tumour cell growth and invasion. However, during wound healing, moderate levels of cell proliferation and angiogenesis are essential [31]. Consequently, modulating PTEN activity can promote these processes. Recent investigations have revealed that miR‐29a‐3p, delivered via hUCMSC‐Exos, promotes tendon healing through the PTEN/mTOR/TGF‐β‐1 signalling cascade [32]. Furthermore, miR‐125a‐3p derived from ADSC‐Exos has been shown to expedite wound healing and angiogenesis in mice by inhibiting PTEN in wound granulation tissues, presenting a novel therapeutic approach [33]. These findings underscore the therapeutic potential of MSC‐Exos and their miRNA cargo in regenerative medicine and wound healing. We have categorised and quantified the miRNAs exerting effects within exosomes derived from various tissues (Figure 3). Our analysis reveals that exosomes from perinatal tissues, including placenta, umbilical cord blood, and amniotic fluid, demonstrate superior regenerative capabilities and tissue repair properties. In contrast, MSC‐Exos derived from adult tissue sources show a more pronounced effect in both regeneration and immune regulation. Furthermore, the same miRNA can be expressed in MSC‐Exos derived from various sources, yet its functions may be contextually distinct. For instance, miR‐199‐5p is present in both BMSC‐Exos and hUMSC‐Exos. BMSC‐Exos are enriched with miR‐199a‐5p, which has been shown to promote the proliferation of neural stem cells [34]. In addition, miR‐199‐5p in hUMSC‐Exos ameliorates lung injury induced by mustard gas by activating the NRF2 signalling pathway, thereby reducing oxidative stress and inhibiting apoptosis.
FIGURE 2.

Mechanisms of Exosome‐Mediated Target Cell Activation and Cargo Transfer. Exosomes have three main mechanisms by which they interact with target cells. To begin with, intracellular signalling molecules released by exosomes can directly interact with target cells, thereby modulating their biological functions accordingly. Additionally, exosomes bind to specific surface receptors on the recipient cell surface, leading to the activation of the target cells. This activation can initiate a cascade of intracellular biological responses through signal transduction pathways. Finally, exosomes can be internalised by recipient cells via direct membrane fusion.
TABLE 1.
Overview of the various mechanisms of action of perinatal tissue‐derived MSC‐Exos.
| Component | Mechanism | Instances |
|---|---|---|
| Human umbilical cord | ||
| lncRNA MALAT1 [35] | lncRNA TUBB6/Nrf2 pathway | Inhibits inflammation and iron death |
| miR‐874‐3p [36] | Regulation of necrotic apoptosis | Reduces renal tubular epithelial cell damage |
| miR‐1246 [37] | Targeting PRSS23 and inhibiting the activation of the Snail/alpha‐smooth muscle Actin signalling | Attenuated hypoxia‐induced myocardial tissue damage |
| miR‐133b [30] | Targeting SGK1 | Promoted proliferation, cell cycle progression, migration and invasion, and apoptosis in HTR8‐S/Vneo and HPT‐8 cells. |
| miR‐451a [38] | Targeting ADAM10 | Limiting epithelial‐mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells |
| miR‐181c [39] | Downregulation of the TLR4 signalling pathway | Reduction of burn‐induced inflammation |
| miR‐146a‐5p [40] | IRAK1/TRAF6 pathway | Reduction of microglia‐mediated neuroinflammatory responses and neurological deficits |
| lncRNA HCP5 [41] | Promotes ESR1 expression by binding to MSI2 | Promotes the proliferation of ovarian granulosa cells |
| miR‐17‐5p [42] | Mitigates ROS accumulation and inhibits downstream target mRNA SIRT7 | Promote ovarian cell proliferation |
| miR‐140‐3p [43] | miR‐140‐3p/FOXP1/Smad pathway | Anti‐fibrotic effects in human endothelial cells |
| miR‐7162‐3p [44] | Targeting 3′‐UTR in endometrial stromal cells (ESC) to regulate APOL6 expression | Protection of ESCs from mifepristone‐induced apoptosis and repair of damaged ESCs |
| miR‐140‐3p [45] | Inhibition of SGK1 upregulation | Alleviating rheumatoid arthritis |
| lnc‐CDHR [46] | Competitive binding of miR‐3149 inhibits target PTEN genes via the AKT/FOXO pathway | Mitigation of epithelial‐mesenchymal transition in the human peritoneal mesothelial cell line |
| miR‐100‐5p [47] | FZD5/Wnt/β‐catenin pathway | Inhibition of cellular progression and inflammatory response in eosinophils, thereby mitigating the progression of atherosclerosis |
| lncRNA UCA1 [48] | miR143/Bcl‐2/Beclin‐1 pathway | Against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury |
| miR‐199a‐5p [49] | CAV1/NRF2 pathway | Attenuates sulfur mustard‐associated oxidative stress |
| miR‐29a‐3p [32] | PTEN/mTOR/TGF‐β‐1 pathway | Tendon regeneration |
| miR‐202‐3p [50] | Regulate extracellular matrix remodelling | Promote endometrial repair |
| miR‐24‐3p [51] | Targeting Keap‐1 signalling | Hepatoprotective by inhibiting lipid accumulation, ROS generation, and inflammation |
| miR‐335‐5p [29] | Reduction of TGF‐β1‐induced ADAM19 protein levels | Reducing inflammation in HK‐2 cells |
| [52] | Regulation of m6A modification of ITG β4 | Alleviated Lipopolysaccharide‐induced acute lung injury |
| miR‐126 [53] | Downregulation of HMGB1 signalling pathway | Reducing hyperglycemia‐induced retinal inflammation |
| lncRNA MALAT1 [54] | Inhibition of the NF‐kappa B/TNF‐α signalling pathway | Delaying the progression of aging and age‐related diseases |
| miR‐455‐3p [55] | Targeting PI3K signalling | Inhibition of macrophage activation and cytokine production by lipopolysaccharide attack for acute inflammatory liver injury. |
| miR‐100‐5p [56] | Elimination of oxidative free radicals through its target NOX4 | Treatment of articular chondrocyte damage and osteoarthritis |
| miR‐21 [57] | Down‐regulates LATS1, thereby reducing phosphorylated LOXL2 and YAP | Promote oestrogen secretion from ovarian granulosa cells |
| miR‐27b‐3p [58] | Mediates YAP downregulation to inhibit LOXL2 expression | Alleviating liver fibrosis |
| miR‐223 [59] | Reduced donor T‐cell migration | Alleviates acute graft‐versus‐host disease |
| miR‐124 [60] | Down‐regulation of the target Foxg1 | Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy |
| lncRNA PTENP1 [61] | Competitive binding of miR‐10a‐5p to stabilise PTEN | Inhibit the glioma cell progression |
| miR‐145‐5p [62] | Attenuates oxidative damage and apoptosis in granulosa cells | Reducing ovarian damage |
| lncRNA GAS5 [63] | Competitive binding to miR‐21 regulates lncRNA GAS5/miR‐21/PTEN through the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway | Mitigation of high glucose‐induced epithelial mesothelial transformation in human peritoneal mesothelial cells |
| miR‐1263 [64] | Targeting Mob1 in recipient cells, thereby activating YAP expression | Reduction of BMSC apoptosis in Disuse osteoporosis |
| 14–3‐3ζ protein [65, 66, 67] | Upregulate SIRT1 expression levels in HaCaT cells by trafficking 14–3‐3ζ protein to relieve UV radiation‐ and H2O2‐induced oxidative stress damage | Reduces UV radiation‐induced ROS production and DNA damage, promotes the activation of autophagy, and exerts cytoprotective effects |
| Increased autophagy levels | Reduction of cisplatin‐induced nephrotoxicity | |
| Up‐regulation of autophagy level in HK‐2 cells | Reduction of cisplatin‐induced nephrotoxicity | |
| TSG‐6 [68] | A secreted protein with anti‐inflammatory and tissue‐protective properties | Protecting the intestinal barrier and modulating the immune response |
| GPX1 [69] | Up‐regulation of ERK1/2 and Bcl‐2 and down‐regulation of IKKB/NFkB/casp‐9/−3 pathway | reduction of hepatic ROS and inhibition of oxidative stress‐induced apoptosis |
| Human deciduous exfoliated | ||
| miR‐100‐5p miR‐1246 [70] | Downregulates VEGF expression | Inhibition of angiogenesis |
| Human amniotic fluid | ||
|
miR‐146a‐5p miR‐548e‐5p [71] |
Regulation of nuclear factor κB, AKT, and mitogen‐activated protein kinase protein phosphorylation | Anti‐inflammatory |
TABLE 2.
Overview of the various mechanisms of action of adult‐derived MSC‐Exos.
| Component | Mechanism | Instances |
|---|---|---|
| Adipose tissue | ||
| miR‐125a‐3p [33] | Inhibition of PTEN in mouse wound granulation tissue | Angiogenesis, wound healing |
| miR‐29a [72] | Inhibition of the TGF‐β2/Smad3 signalling pathway | Inhibits scar formation |
|
lncRNA IFNG‐AS1 [73] |
Acts as a molecular sponge through the miR‐21a‐3p/PI3K/AKT signalling pathway | Neurogenesis |
| miR‐216a‐5p [74] | Regulation of the HMGB1/TLR4/NF‐kappa B signalling pathway | Induces macrophage M2 polarisation and attenuates colitis. |
| miR‐148a‐3p [75] | Preventing PTEN and triggering PI3K/Akt signalling | Angiogenesis, wound healing |
| EGR‐1 [76] | Activation of the lncRNA‐SENCR/VEGF‐A axis | Angiogenesis, wound healing |
|
VEGF MCP‐2/4 [77] |
Promotion of VEGF‐R expression | Angiogenesis |
| Bone marrow | ||
| miR‐146a [78] | Targeting IRAK1, TRAF6 and IRF5 in immune cells | Anti‐inflammatory |
| miR‐144‐5p [79] | Mediated PTEN inhibition leads to the activation of PI3K/AKT signalling | Induction of apoptosis or cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase |
| lncRNA H19 [80] | Competitive binding of miR‐467 to affect Hoxa10 expression | Affects osteoblast differentiation |
| miR‐30b‐5p [81] | EZH2/PI3K/AKT axis | Promoting apoptosis and arresting tumourigenesis in non‐small cell lung cancer cells |
| lncRNA TUC339 [82] | Increased expression of TUC339 | Promoting macrophage M1 to M2 polarisation, inhibiting inflammation, and promoting chondrocyte activity to ameliorate osteoarthritis |
| circHIPK3 [83] | Acts as a miR‐29a‐5p sponge and plays a role in mitochondrial autophagy by targeting miR‐29a‐5p and PINK1 | Promoting osteoblastic differentiation of MC3T3‐E1 cells |
| miR‐181b [84] | Regulation of the interleukin 10/STAT3 pathway | Suppression of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury |
| miR‐199a‐5p [34] | GSK‐3 β/β‐catenin signalling. | Promote neural stem cell proliferation |
| miR‐202‐5p [85] | Targeting CMPK2 | Inhibition of up‐regulation of focal death proteins, alleviate lung ischemic‐reperfusion injury |
| miR‐21‐5p [86] | Inhibition of PDCD4 expression | Reduction of β‐cell apoptosis in the early stages of islet transplantation |
| miR‐144 [87] | Targeting the PTEN/AKT pathway | Inhibition of apoptotic injury under hypoxic conditions |
| miR‐136‐5p [88] | Targets Elf3 and can downregulate its expression | Promotes chondrocyte migration with increased expression of collagen II, aggregated glycans, and SOX9 and decreased expression of MMP‐13. |
| miR‐96 [89] | Inhibition of the Rac/nuclear factor‐κ B signalling pathway | Protection of myocardium from doxorubicin‐induced toxicity |
| miR‐206 [90] | Decrease Elf3 | Promote proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts in OA |
| miR‐124‐3p [91] | Inhibiting Ern1 and promoting M2 polarisation | Improvement of spinal cord ischemia–reperfusion and its associated injuries |
|
lncRNA KLF3‐AS1 [92] |
miR‐206/ubiquitin‐specific peptidase 22‐axis stabilisation sirtuin‐1 | Improved neurological function in mice with middle cerebral artery occlusion promoted cell viability inhibited apoptosis and inflammatory injury, and reactive oxygen species production |
| Tooth pulp | ||
| lncRNA Ankrd26 [93] | Regulates miR‐150‐TLR4 signalling | Promote endodontic restoration |
FIGURE 3.

Classify the miRNA cargos in MSC‐Exos derived from different donors. Perinatal tissues, including the placenta, umbilical cord blood, and amniotic fluid, as well as adult tissues such as bone marrow and adipose tissue, are common sources of MSC‐Exos. MSC‐Exos derived from adult tissue sources contain miRNAs that exhibit superior regenerative and immunomodulatory capabilities, with perinatal tissue‐derived MSC‐Exos showing particular prominence in tissue repair and cellular regeneration.
3. Mechanisms of Anti‐Aging in Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes
MSC‐Exos mitigate age‐related diseases across multiple systems through diverse signalling pathways. The specific mechanisms of action of exosomes include immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory effects, suppression of oxidative stress, promotion of cell migration and proliferation, and remodelling of the aging microenvironment (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4.

Mechanisms of MSC‐Exos in the treatment of age‐related diseases. A Immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory, MSC‐Exos mediate immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory effects by regulating the polarisation of T cells and macrophages, promoting an anti‐inflammatory state while inhibiting pro‐inflammatory responses; B Suppression of oxidative stress, MSC‐Exos mitigate oxidative stress by activating cellular antioxidant defence mechanisms, including NRF2/ARE signalling pathway. Through the upregulation of antioxidant enzymes (e.g., SOD, GPx), MSC‐Exos facilitate the reduction of ROS and prevent autophagy oxidative DNA damage, thereby inhibiting pathways associated with tumour progression and cellular senescence; C Promotion of cell migration and proliferation, MSC‐Exos activate the PI3K/AKt/mTOR signalling pathways by PTEN to promotion protein synthesis, cell growth, and cell proliferation;D Remodelling of the aging microenvironment, MSC‐Exos regulate the aging microenvironment by modulating the expression of inflammatory and anti‐inflammatory factors within the SASP. Through the suppression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, MSC‐Exos alleviate age‐related inflammation and mitigate cellular aging processes that are exacerbated under stress conditions.
3.1. Immunomodulatory and Anti‐Inflammatory
Inflammatory aging denotes a state of persistent, low‐grade inflammation accompanying the aging process and shows a propensity to escalate with advancing age [94]. A cardinal feature of inflammatory aging is the perturbation in the equilibrium between pro‐inflammatory and anti‐inflammatory mediators. Molecularly, cellular senescence precipitates the secretion of pro‐inflammatory factors collectively referred to as senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP). These SASPs encompass a spectrum of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, chemokines and growth factors, which are implicated in the perpetuation of chronic inflammation and the progression of cellular senescence [95]. At the cellular level, immune cells, pivotal in the regulation and clearance of senescent cells, undergo functional decline with age. This senescence of the immune system is implicated in the compromised clearance of senescent cells and the accumulation of pro‐inflammatory factors, thereby contributing to heightened levels of inflammation. This evolving inflammatory milieu is posited to further the aging process in a cyclical and self‐sustaining manner [95]. If unaddressed, the relentless accrual of inflammatory processes at the molecular and cellular strata can precipitate pathological aging of organs. Persistent inflammation impedes reparative mechanisms and escalates the risk of geriatric disease [96].
MSC‐Exos have risen as influential regulators of immune cell function, integral to the maintenance of immune system homeostasis and the attenuation of age‐associated inflammatory responses. Enriched with inflammatory modulators, including transforming growth factor‐beta (TGF‐β), nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and interleukin‐10 (IL‐10), MSC‐Exos exert anti‐inflammatory effects. They operate by curbing the release of inflammatory mediators and by orchestrating immune responses. Specifically, TGF‐β inhibits the activity of a wide range of immunoreactive cells while inducing an immunosuppressive cell phenotype to maintain immune homeostasis [97]. NO, a vascular modulator, dilates blood vessels to increase blood flow to inflamed areas, facilitating nutrient delivery and waste clearance, while also suppressing inflammatory cell activity to reduce inflammation. Additionally, MSC‐Exos can influence lymphocyte differentiation [98]. Research has discovered that MSC‐Exos are capable of inhibiting the secretion of IL‐1β and TNF‐α while promoting the secretion of TGF‐β. Further studies have indicated that MSC‐Exos can induce the transformation of Th1 cells towards Th2 cells [99]. Concurrently, MSC‐Exos are enriched with negative feedback immunomodulatory molecules, such as Programmed Death‐Ligand 1 (PD‐L1) and TGF‐β. PD‐L1 is instrumental in dampening T‐cell immune responses and fostering the expansion of regulatory Tregs [100], while TGF‐β facilitates the differentiation of monocytes into Tregs [101]. In the experimental study on immunomodulatory effects on experimental type‐1 autoimmune diabetes (T1DM), ADSC‐Exos exert therapeutic effects on autoimmune T1DM by expanding the population of Tregs and their products. Notably, there is no change observed in the proliferation index of lymphocytes, which suggests that these exosomes could offer a more effective and practical therapeutic option [102]. MSC‐Exos have demonstrated the capacity to regulate macrophage polarisation. In a study conducted by Zhao, ADSC‐Exos were observed to act upon macrophages, inducing high levels of M2‐associated arginase‐1 (Arg‐1) and IL‐10 [103]. This action inhibits the inflammatory responses of macrophages stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in conjunction with IFN‐γ. The ADSC‐Exos, which induced an Arg‐1highM2 phenotype, exhibited elevated levels of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (p‐STAT3). This finding suggests that ADSC‐Exos may be a significant source of p‐STAT3 for recipient macrophages. ADSC‐Exos that lacked STAT3 activation failed to induce Arg‐1 expression in macrophages, whereas the knockdown of STAT3 in macrophages did not affect the Arg‐1 expression induced by ADSC‐Exos. This underscores the role of exosome‐borne active STAT3 in the transcriptional activation of Arg‐1, leading to the induction of an anti‐inflammatory M2 macrophage phenotype [103]. Another study has demonstrated that MSC‐Exos modulate immune cell responses by activating M2‐type macrophages, inhibiting M1‐type macrophages, and enhancing the expression of anti‐inflammatory cytokines IL‐10 and TGF‐β, thereby promoting tissue repair. Contrary to lipopolysaccharide, they induce high levels of anti‐inflammatory IL10 and TGFβ1 transcripts at 3 and 72 h, while the levels of pro‐inflammatory IL1B, IL6, TNFA, and IL12P40 transcripts are significantly reduced within 3 h [104].
3.2. Suppression of Oxidative Stress
Oxidative stress, a critical catalyst in the aging process, arises from an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a biological system's capacity for detoxification. This imbalance is particularly pronounced as organisms age, often precipitating mitochondrial dysfunction that escalates ROS levels, thereby further impairing mitochondrial function and cellular energy metabolism. The consequent oxidative stress can induce DNA damage, which, if persistently unrepaired, may lead to genomic instability—a significant contributor to the aging phenotype. Moreover, oxidative stress accelerates the shortening of telomeres, triggering cellular senescence as cells exhaust their capacity for division [105]. The peroxidation of lipids in cellular membranes by ROS disrupts membrane fluidity and function, propelling cellular aging [106]. Additionally, oxidative stress activates inflammatory pathways, fostering chronic inflammation that is both a hallmark of aging and a risk factor for a variety of age‐related diseases. Proteins are not spared by oxidative stress, which can induce modifications leading to misfolding and aggregation, especially in neurodegenerative conditions [107]. Furthermore, oxidative stress can precipitate a decline in immune function, reducing the body's ability to fight infections and increasing the risk of autoimmune and neoplastic diseases.
MSC‐Exos are recognised for their potential to mitigate the oxidative stress inherent to the aging process through a variety of mechanisms. MSC‐Exos have emerged as pivotal players in neutralising oxidative stress by scavenging ROS, thereby preventing the cytoarchitectural damage and dysfunction that ensue [108]. These exosomes are laden with antioxidants such as glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), which are instrumental in bolstering the antioxidant defences of recipient cells. Notably, GPX1, secreted by hUCMSC‐Exos, has been shown to degrade oxidative stress‐inducing agents such as carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [69]. Additionally, ADSC‐Exos have been reported to reduce high glucose‐induced oxidative stress by increasing the activity of SOD2, thus alleviating mitochondrial dysfunction [109]. The inclusion of Vitamin E in MSC‐Exos further amplifies their antioxidant capabilities by directly neutralising free radicals and reducing lipid peroxidation, safeguarding cell membranes from oxidative damage [110]. Beyond direct ROS neutralisation, bioactive molecules within exosomes activate the intracellular antioxidant system, modulating the expression of genes that constitute the endogenous antioxidant defence system. This activation enhances the cells' overall antioxidant capacity, providing a comprehensive defence against oxidative stress. The Nrf2/ARE signalling pathway is integral to the cellular response to oxidative stress. The transcription factor NF‐E2‐related factor 2 (Nrf2) binds to the antioxidant‐responsive element (ARE), a cis‐acting element that mediates the transcriptional activation of protective genes. Activation of this pathway serves to safeguard cells from oxidative stress‐induced apoptosis [111]. ADSC‐Exos have been shown to activate this pathway, initiating the transcription and translation of antioxidant genes, as well as the expression of antioxidant enzymes and related proteins. This activation helps to reduce intracellular ROS levels and ameliorate mitochondrial and cellular damage [112, 113]. The miRNAs carried by MSC‐Exos, such as the miR‐17‐92 cluster, counteract oxidative stress by targeting the downregulation of PTEN, which in turn activates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/GSK‐3β signalling pathway. This activation may contribute to the upregulation of antioxidant pathways within the cell, further enhancing the cell's defence mechanisms against oxidative stress [114].
Autophagy and oxidative stress are interconnected physiological processes that play pivotal roles in cellular homeostasis and disease progression. During autophagy, damaged organelles and proteins are sequestered into autophagosomes and then transported to lysosomes for degradation, thereby regulating intracellular material recycling and maintaining cellular redox balance. For instance, studies have shown that under conditions of nutrient deprivation, autophagy reduces ROS production by degrading impaired mitochondria [115]. MSC‐Exos may activate mitochondrial autophagy, a process that selectively removes damaged mitochondria, thereby helping to reduce intracellular ROS levels. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is a significant regulatory axis of autophagy, with MSC‐Exos stimulating autophagy in recipient cells by transferring bioactive molecules, such as Beclin‐1 and LC3, to eliminate intracellular senescence‐associated proteins and organelles [116]. Another study has demonstrated that MSC‐Exos enhance mitochondrial autophagy by upregulating FOXO3a expression, thereby protecting microglia from ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)‐induced pyroptosis and attenuating subsequent neuronal damage [117].
3.3. Promotion of Cell Migration and Proliferation
Aging is characterised by a complex series of biological changes within cells, leading to a gradual decline in their functional capabilities and ultimately resulting in cellular senescence and death. The voids left in tissues and organs necessitate timely replenishment to preserve the homeostatic functioning of the organism. In this context, cell proliferation and migration emerge as particularly critical processes. Cell proliferation forms the basis for the generation of new cells to replace those that have become senescent or have died. This process is essential for maintaining tissue integrity and repairing damaged structures. The fidelity of cell proliferation hinges on a delicate balance of biochemical reactions, which can be compromised by the accumulation of genetic damage and the decline in organelle function—hallmarks of aging [118, 119]. Parallel to cell proliferation, cell migration is equally vital for orchestrating immune responses and facilitating tissue regeneration. Cell migration not only shields the organism from infections and diseases but also fosters tissue repair and renewal. The ability of cells to migrate is influenced by various factors, including cytoskeletal remodelling, alterations in adhesion molecule expression, and changes in the extracellular matrix composition. MSC‐Exos may play a role in combating aging by promoting cell proliferation and migration through the activation of signalling pathways associated with these processes.
MSC‐Exos are enriched with a plethora of bioactive components, including growth factors, cytokines, miRNAs, and other biologically active molecules. Growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and platelet‐derived growth factor (PDGF) within MSC‐Exos play pivotal roles in promoting cell proliferation, differentiation and angiogenesis, which are essential for tissue repair [120]. Cytokines like HGF and IGF contribute to cell proliferation and differentiation, and are involved in the synthesis of the extracellular matrix. MiRNAs, including miR‐125a, miR‐21, and miR‐146a, facilitate angiogenesis in endothelial cells and modulate gene expression to enhance lymphocyte proliferation and differentiation [121]. Collectively, these components exert their effects through various signalling pathways and mechanisms, which modulate cell signalling pathways and regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis. For instance, they upregulate anti‐apoptotic genes like Bcl‐xL, downregulate pro‐apoptotic genes like Casp1, and activate extracellular signal‐regulated kinases to promote cell proliferation and anti‐apoptosis, essential for tissue repair [122]. Thereby, MSC‐Exos can promote cell proliferation and migration, which are crucial in the therapeutic management of age‐related diseases. Research indicates that transcription factors in MSC‐Exos are crucial for the maintenance of MSC pluripotency and self‐renewal by promoting the expression of pluripotency‐associated genes and inhibiting those related to differentiation [123]. Additionally, studies have shown that under hypoxic conditions, miR‐155 in MSC‐Exos positively modulates the expression of immunomodulatory factors in MSCs, thus preserving their regenerative capacity. Furthermore, exosomes enhance the proliferation and migration of target cells, thereby exerting anti‐aging effects in conditions such as osteoarthritis. Activation of this pathway is typically initiated by extracellular stimuli. miR‐21, a miRNA involved in numerous biological processes, including cell proliferation and migration, can activate the PI3K/Akt pathway, which is integral to regulating cell metabolism, proliferation, survival, growth, and angiogenesis, by targeting genes like the tumour suppressor gene pTEN [124]. This activation enhances the proliferation and migration of skin fibroblasts, contributing to wound healing and skin regeneration [125]. Activation of this pathway is typically initiated by extracellular stimuli, such as growth factors, cytokines, or hormones. miR‐21, a miRNA involved in numerous biological processes, including cell proliferation and migration, can activate the PI3K/Akt pathway by targeting genes like the tumour suppressor gene pTEN [126, 127]. MSC‐Exos contribute to the rejuvenation of cells by inducing autophagy, promoting DNA repair, and facilitating angiogenesis. MSCs also harbour DNA repair enzymes, including PARP1 and APE1, capable of repairing DNA damage in recipient cells, thus slowing the aging process [124]. Furthermore, MSCs stimulate vascular neogenesis, improve tissue perfusion, and decelerate cellular senescence by secreting growth factors like VEGF, EGF and PDGF.
3.4. Remodelling of the Aging Microenvironment
The aging microenvironment refers to the local milieu surrounding target cells, encompassing elements such as the extracellular matrix (ECM), cytokines, and neighbouring cells, which collectively influence cellular behaviour and function [128]. Given that the SASP is a result of aged cells expressing and secreting a variety of extracellular modulators, including the pro‐inflammatory factors mentioned earlier that contribute to inflamm‐aging, the generated ROS can further stimulate cellular oxidative stress and the onset of senescence. Additionally, factors such as matrix remodelling enzymes affect the modification of the ECM, the fate of neighbouring cells, and intercellular communication, thereby coordinating the modification of the microenvironment [129]. The aging microenvironment, as proposed by the inflamm‐aging hypothesis, is characterised by a deteriorating milieu influenced by the SASPs, which are secreted via paracrine mechanisms. These factors not only initiate chronic inflammation but also induce senescence in neighbouring normal cells, establishing a self‐perpetuating cycle [130]. These factors dynamically, interactively, and adaptively influence the microenvironment, collectively constituting the aging microenvironment. Consequently, researchers have explored the reshaping of the senescent microenvironment as a means to mitigate the effects of aging. The stem cell microenvironment also declines with age, with a noticeable decrease in stem cell numbers and functionality, thus limiting the regenerative capacity of tissues. Aging induces alterations in metabolic pathways, affecting cellular energy production and metabolic waste clearance, leading to a progressive decline in cellular and tissue function. Furthermore, modifications in cellular signalling pathways with age influence how cells respond to growth factors, hormones, and other regulatory signals [131, 132], profoundly affecting cell proliferation, differentiation and survival.
MSC‐Exos play a crucial role in regulating the aging microenvironment. They participate in intercellular communication by carrying various bioactive molecules, influencing neighbouring cells, and exerting a regulatory effect on the aging microenvironment. The ability of MSC‐Exos to mitigate the effects of cellular senescence is particularly noteworthy [128]. They achieve this by modulating specific components of the SASP, which typically consists of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and ECM remodelling factors that can adversely affect neighbouring cells. By reducing the secretion of these detrimental factors, MSC‐Exos help restore homeostasis within the senescent microenvironment. Furthermore, MSC‐Exos influence critical cellular processes, including apoptosis, growth, proliferation, and differentiation. They achieve this by interacting with the ECM, which provides structural support and biochemical signals necessary for cell survival and function. This interaction allows MSC‐Exos to transmit bioactive molecules that alter the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of recipient cells, thereby enhancing their regenerative potential and promoting cell survival [133]. The bioactive molecules carried by MSC‐Exos, such as growth factors and cytokines, can stimulate the proliferation and self‐renewal of stem cells, maintaining a stable and continuous supply of stem cell pools. Pro‐angiogenic factors in MSC‐Exos promote blood vessel neovascularization in the stem cell microenvironment, providing better blood supply and nutritional conditions. By regulating signalling pathways associated with cellular senescence, MSC‐Exos can slow the aging process of stem cells and maintain their functionality and regenerative capacity. The Hippo signalling pathway, an evolutionarily conserved pathway originally discovered in Drosophila and homologous in mammals, plays a key role in tissue regeneration, cell proliferation, and apoptosis [134, 135]. The pathway's core is a kinase cascade reaction involving multiple protein interactions. Mst1/2 kinase, bound to the Sav1 protein, activates Lats1/2 kinase, which phosphorylates and inhibits the transcriptional co‐activators YAP and TAZ. Phosphorylated YAP and TAZ are retained in the cytoplasm, unable to enter the nucleus. When the Hippo signalling pathway is inhibited, YAP and TAZ translocate to the nucleus, bind to the TEAD family of transcription factors, and activate genes that promote cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis. The anti‐apoptotic effects of hUCMSC‐Exos on BMSCs in wasting osteoporosis involve the exosome miR‐1263, which inhibits the Mob1 inhibition of the BMSCs Hippo signalling pathway [64]. Moreover, MSC‐Exos provide a healthier living environment for stem cells by inhibiting oxidative stress and improving the inflammatory state of the stem cell microenvironment.
4. Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes in Anti‐Aging
Biologists believe that aging may have an important internal relationship with many common diseases and that aging may increase the risk of a variety of diseases, including osteoarthritis (OA), skin aging, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).
4.1. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes in Osteoarthritis
OA is the most common degenerative joint disease, with aging and obesity as major risk factors. Senescent cells, particularly in articular cartilage, inhibit stem cell differentiation, affecting joint regeneration [136]. Their removal can slow post‐traumatic OA progression, possibly due to reduced SASP. Specifically, in the context of OA, senescent p16INK4a‐positive cells have been demonstrated to induce the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) as part of the SASP. SASP, containing pro‐inflammatory cytokines and MMPs, degrades the ECM, contributing to OA's structural decline. Aging also brings epigenetic changes affecting chondrocyte function and stress response [137], mitochondrial dysfunction causing oxidative stress and energy deficits [138], and metabolic shifts leading to ECM component alterations, increasing cartilage wear [139]. Growth factor response modifications with age can impair chondrocyte maintenance of the cartilage matrix and response to signals. These factors—senescent cells, epigenetic alterations, mitochondrial issues, metabolic changes, and growth factor dysregulation—create a microenvironment that accelerates chondrocyte aging and joint degeneration.
MSC‐Exos have demonstrated remarkable potential in modulating cellular processes that are essential for maintaining cartilage health and facilitating its regeneration. In a study by Rilla et al., the intra‐articular injection of BMSC‐Exos into a rat model of osteoarthritis led to a significant enhancement in the content of type II collagen and proteoglycans within the cartilage tissues [140]. Concurrently, there was a notable decrease in the expression of matrix‐degrading enzymes such as MMP‐13 and aggrecanase, effectively promoting the repair of the cartilage matrix [140]. MSC‐Exos are equipped with a plethora of angiogenic factors, including VEGF, FGF, and PDGF. These factors are instrumental in stimulating neovascularization and augmenting blood supply to the affected areas [141]. The enhanced blood flow delivers vital oxygen and nutrients to the cells, underpinning their survival and reparative activities, while also aiding in the clearance of metabolic waste. This collective action fosters an auspicious environment conducive to chondrocyte survival. Several studies have attested to the capacity of MSCs to regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis, bolster extracellular matrix formation, and invigorate cartilage regeneration. Kuang et al. discovered that hUCMSC‐Exos could curb chondrocyte apoptosis by dampening the activities of B‐cell lymphoma‐2‐related promoter protein and cysteinyl aspartate‐specific protease‐3 through the Akt signalling pathway [142]. The Wnt signalling pathway, a cardinal signalling system in cell biology, governs cell proliferation, migration, and death. Its over‐activation has been implicated in apoptosis [143]. BMSC‐Exos, through the modulation of Wnt signalling, may attenuate chondrocyte apoptosis, thus mitigating the progression of osteoarthritis and other degenerative conditions [144]. Moreover, the Wnt pathway is intricately involved in the inflammatory response [145]. By tempering the Wnt signalling pathway, BMSC‐Exos may alleviate joint inflammation and ameliorate the symptoms of arthritis [144]. MSC‐Exos have been observed to counteract inflammatory senescence by diminishing the expression of inflammatory mediators, thereby indirectly hindering the onset of osteoarthritis. In vitro, studies have shown that the addition of MSC‐Exos to a chondrocyte culture medium, under stimulation with IL‐1β, resulted in the suppression of inflammatory factors such as TNF‐α and IL‐6 [146]. Vonk's research further elucidated that BMSC‐Exos impeded the phosphorylation of NF‐κB inhibitory proteins, culminating in the inhibition of the NF‐κB signalling cascade and a decrement in the expression of related inflammatory factors [147].
4.2. Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes in Skin Aging
The skin, as the body's largest tissue, shows aging effects from external exposure. Theories include oxidative stress, photoaging, and inflammation. ECM degradation, supported by increased MMPs and decreased inhibitors like TIMP‐1, leads to skin sagging and reduced elasticity [148]. UV radiation boosts MMPs, causing DNA damage and photoaging [149, 150]. Senescent cells, more common in older skin, release inflammatory SASP, which degrades ECM and accelerates aging. Fibroblast proliferation arrest and SASP increase also contribute to aging by impairing skin repair [151]. Age‐related skin microenvironment changes, such as reduced hydration and dermal thinning, weaken the skin's barrier and moisture retention [152]. Decreased lipids and glycosaminoglycans further disrupt skin structure and hydration.
A plethora of research has illuminated the capacity of exosomes MSC‐Exos to rejuvenate and regenerate damaged skin tissues through a myriad of mechanisms. Specifically, human umbilical cord‐derived mesenchymal stem cell exosomes hUCMSC‐Exos have demonstrated the ability to modulate the synthesis and degradation of the ECM, thereby mitigating the aging process of skin tissues. This is achieved by enhancing the production of collagen and elastin, key structural proteins that maintain skin integrity and elasticity, and by dampening the activity of MMPs, enzymes that can degrade these proteins when overactive, leading to a slowdown in the aging process [153]. HUCMSC‐Exos have been shown to stimulate the proliferation and migration of fibroblasts damaged by ultraviolet radiation. By optimising collagen deposition and stimulating elastin production, hUCMSC‐Exos expedite the healing of skin compromised by injury [141]. The exosomes are laden with growth factors that serve as potent activators of skin stem cells, thereby fostering the regeneration of damaged skin. These growth factors include PDGF, which synergize to augment the proliferation and differentiation of skin cells and hasten wound healing [154]. Moreover, hUCMSC‐Exos contain a constellation of bioactive molecules that can attenuate the detrimental effects of UV radiation [155]. Through the SIRT1 pathway, these exosomes can transport protective proteins such as 14–3‐3ζ to HaCaT cells, mediating a reduction in oxidative stress and inflammation, and effectively safeguarding skin cells from UV‐induced damage [65]. In summation, the collective findings underscore the proficiency of MSC‐Exos in facilitating the resuscitation of physiological functions in aging skin, offering a trove of opportunities for innovative treatments that could transform the landscape of dermatological care.
4.3. Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes in Cardiovascular Disease
Aging affects the heart and blood vessels, increasing susceptibility to CVD. In aged rats, cardiac angiotensin II levels rise, promoting vasoconstriction and hypertension, which are key in CVD development [156]. Mitochondrial dysfunction with age can lead to energy deficits, oxidative stress, and cellular damage within the heart. Inflammation, central to atherosclerosis, causes arterial plaque buildup, impeding blood flow and heightening the risk of heart attacks and strokes [157]. Anti‐inflammatory therapies have shown promise in CVD secondary prevention, emphasising inflammation's role in the disease. Cellular senescence in the heart, with the accumulation of non‐dividing, altered‐secretory senescent cardiomyocytes, is linked to CVD progression [158]. Their clearance post‐myocardial infarction improves outcomes, suggesting a therapeutic potential. Additional contributors to age‐related CVD include reduced vascular elasticity, endothelial dysfunction and altered lipid metabolism, leading to atherosclerotic plaque accumulation. Aging also impacts the heart's electrical system, potentially causing arrhythmias and conduction issues [159]. The body's regenerative capacity declines with age, limiting the heart's ability to repair post‐ischemia or injury, associated with a decrease in cardiac stem cell numbers and functionality, essential for tissue maintenance and repair [160].
MSC‐Exos have emerged as a therapeutic powerhouse in cardiovascular disease therapy, with capabilities that span from vascular regeneration to immunomodulation, inhibition of oxidative stress, and myocardial protection. These extracellular vesicles are equipped with a plethora of angiogenesis‐promoting growth factors, such as VEGF, FGF, and PDGF. These factors are instrumental in stimulating the formation of new blood vessels, thereby enhancing blood supply to damaged areas and improving microcirculation [154]. The miR‐let7/HMGA2/NF‐κB pathway is a key regulatory mechanism by which MSC‐Exos promote the polarisation of M2 macrophages within atherosclerotic plaques in mice, reducing atherosclerotic inflammation and contributing to the mitigation of cardiovascular disease [161]. Oxidative stress, a significant etiological factor in cardiomyocyte death, can be alleviated by miR‐129‐5p, a microRNA carried by MSC‐Exos. This molecule engages in the TRAF3/NF‐κB pathway, offering a promising approach to treating heart failure [162, 163]. Furthermore, MSC‐Exos have been shown to modulate lncRNA A2M‐AS1, which in turn regulates the miR‐556‐5p/XIAP axis in target cells. This regulation attenuates hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)‐induced oxidative stress in cardiomyocytes, providing a novel perspective on the protection of myocardial cells. Promotion of cardiomyocyte proliferation is pivotal in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Encapsulated within exosomes, hsa‐miR‐590‐3p downregulates genes such as Hopx that inhibit cell proliferation [164]. Once internalised by cardiomyocytes, these exosomes stimulate the proliferation of cells in the peri‐infarct region, aiding in the restoration of cardiac function [165]. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that bone marrow stem cells, under the influence of exosomes, can differentiate into cardiomyocytes when expressing GATA‐4. This process not only reduces cardiomyocyte apoptosis but also enhances myocardial function post‐infarction [166].
4.4. Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Aging is the key risk factor for AD, a neurodegenerative disorder causing cognitive decline and memory loss. Evidence points to DNA damage and impaired repair mechanisms as significant contributors to AD [167]. Oxidative stress from ROS in high‐metabolic neurons can damage DNA. The capacity for base excision repair, vital for DNA damage recognition and repair, is reduced in mild cognitive impairment, indicating a decline in the brain's integrity with age [168]. Excessive DNA damage can lead to mistranslation by DNA polymerase, genome errors, and neurodegeneration. Mitochondrial dysfunction, particularly impaired mitophagy, causes oxidative stress and energy deficits, disrupting cellular metabolism and contributing to neuronal dysfunction [169, 170]. Epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, impact gene expression, affecting the brain's resilience and repair capacity, and influencing synaptic plasticity, neuronal survival, and inflammation, crucial for cognitive function [171]. Additionally, aging is linked to a decrease in neurotrophic factors, reducing neuronal maintenance and repair, and increasing brain vulnerability to degeneration. The complex interaction of these factors—DNA damage, mitochondrial issues, epigenetic changes, and neurotrophic decline—may foster the development of AD.
MSC‐Exos have shown promise in promoting neurogenesis, curbing inflammation‐induced neuronal damage in the hippocampus, reducing oxidative stress, and leveraging the targeted drug delivery capabilities of exosomes, thereby playing a role in neurodegenerative diseases. BMSC‐Exos have been demonstrated to stimulate neurogenesis and improve cognitive function by enhancing astrocyte formation and synaptic connectivity [172]. In the context of neurological disorders, ADSC‐Exos have been shown to promote HT22 cell proliferation and facilitate the repair of damaged neurons [173]. Moreover, miRNA‐146 and miRNA‐21 encapsulated within hUCMSC‐Exos and BMSC‐Exos are capable of polarising microglia towards an anti‐inflammatory M2 phenotype, thereby mitigating neuroinflammation and improving cognitive function through immunomodulation [174]. The expression of inflammatory mediators, including IL‐1β, IL‐6, TNF‐α, amyloid‐β1‐42 (Aβ1‐42), and phosphorylated tau (p‐Tau), in hippocampal microglia and astrocytes is suppressed, further alleviating neuroinflammation and cognitive dysfunction [175]. Trophoblast stem cell‐derived exosomes may reduce ROS production and oxidative stress by delivering miR‐100‐5p, which downregulates the expression of NOX4, thereby ameliorating dopaminergic neuronal injury in Parkinson's disease model mice through the NOX4‐ROS‐Nrf2 pathway [176]. Furthermore, exosomes can effectively traverse the blood–brain barrier, enabling distribution within the central nervous system and facilitating targeted drug delivery for neurodegenerative diseases. Jahangard et al. injected miRNA‐29 encapsulated within MSC‐Exos into an AD rat model and reported upregulation of miRNA‐29 in hippocampal samples, with downregulation of BIM and BACE1 proteins and reduced Aβ peptide levels, effectively ameliorating Alzheimer's symptoms [177]. Additionally, the surface of MSC‐Exos can be modified to enhance their targeting capabilities. The incorporation of CNS‐associated rabies virus glycoprotein peptides into the membranes of MSC‐Exos increases their targeting and aggregation in the hippocampus and cortical layers of AD animal models, offering a promising therapeutic strategy [178].
5. Prospect of Future Clinical Application
MSC‐Exos are transitioning from bench to bedside, with numerous clinical applications beginning to emerge (Table 3). MSC‐Exos show promise in addressing aging and age‐related diseases, but challenges remain. Sourcing MSCs varies in ethical considerations and technical hurdles persist in isolating MSC‐Exos, requiring improved purification methods to ensure clinical purity and consistency. Clinical use is hindered by the lack of standardised dosing and guidelines, necessitating rigorous trials to establish optimal regimens. The combination of exosome technology with cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs) offers a new approach to drug delivery, potentially enhancing therapeutic precision and efficacy while mitigating side effects. This strategy could improve drug stability and bioavailability, marking a significant advancement in therapeutics. Direct secretion of bioactive factors from MSCs, independent of exosomal encapsulation, also plays a role in anti‐aging effects. As MSC‐Exos move towards clinical applications, they are showing potential in wound healing, bone regeneration, and neurodegenerative disease treatment, indicating a broad impact on medical care. However, the field requires careful development to realise these benefits fully.
TABLE 3.
Clinical trials of MSC‐Exos in the clinical treatment.
| Disease | Delivered | Process | Efficacy | Clinical trial number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSC‐Exos | ||||
| Alzheimer's disease | Nasal spray | Nine subjects aged ≥ 50 with AD received allogeneic ASC‐Exos | Primary endpoints included liver and kidney function, ADAS‐cog, and ADCS‐ADL scores within 3 months | NCT04388982 |
| Periodontitis | Injection | 10 subjects received local MSC‐Exos in periodontal pockets, followed for 6 months | Primary endpoints include changes in gingival inflammation, periodontal pocket depth, attachment level, and bone density | NCT04270006 |
| Acne scars | Epidermal application | 25 volunteers, aged 19–54, treated with ASC‐Exos combined with CO2 FCL | The treated side demonstrated reduced pore size and skin surface roughness from baseline | [179] |
| BMSC‐Exos | ||||
| Epidermolysis bullosa | Wounds application | 6 doses of BM‐MSC‐Exos over 3 months | Primary endpoint: dose‐limiting toxicity; secondary endpoint: wound size | NCT04173650 |
| Severe COVID‐19 | Intravenous | Dose of 1–10 × 10^6 MSCs/kg | Survival rate of 83%; approximately 71% of patients achieved clinical recovery, 13% remained critically ill but stable, and 16% died from unrelated causes. Clinical status and oxygenation improved, with reductions in C‐reactive protein by 77%, ferritin by 43%, and D‐dimer by 42% following a single dose | NCT04276987 |
| Knee Osteoarthritis | Injection | 33 veterans received a single 2 mL dose of Exo | Significant improvements in Brief Pain Inventory and Oswestry Disability Index scores by 77% and 80% at 6 months. Upper and lower extremity function scores improved by 51% and 76%, respectively | NCT05060107 |
| Stroke | Injection | 5 subjects aged 40–80 received a single 200 mg dose of miR‐124‐transfected BMSC‐Exos in the ischemic area 1 month post‐stroke | 12‐month follow‐up for recurrent stroke, cerebral edema, seizures, and ischemic‐to‐hemorrhagic transformation. Improvement assessed using the Rankin scale | NCT03384433 |
| hUCMSC‐Exos | ||||
|
Chronic GVHD‐related Dry Eye |
Artificial tear drops | 27 subjects aged 18–70 used artificial tears for 2 weeks, then 10 mg UC‐MSC‐Exos four times daily for 2 weeks | Primary endpoint: change in Ocular Surface Disease Index score at 12 weeks; secondary endpoints: tear production, tear film breakup time, fluorescein staining area, eye redness, tear meniscus, and best‐corrected visual acuity | NCT04213248 |
| Type 1 diabetes mellitus | Intravenous injection | 20 patients aged 18–60 with C‐peptide reduction > 50%, C‐peptide ≥ 0.8 ng/mL, insulin ≥ 0.4 IU/kg/d received two consecutive intravenous injections | Exosomes characterised by CD63, CD9, Alix, TSG101, HSP70; MVs by Annexin V, Flotillin‐2, selectins, integrins, CD40 metalloprotease. Primary endpoints: changes in insulin dose and HbA1c levels | NCT02138331 |
| Chronic kidney disease | Intravenous and arterial injection | 40 patients with CKD stage III or IV, aged 26–44, randomised 1:1 into a control group (saline) or UCB‐MSC‐Exos group (100 μg/kg) | Significant improvements in glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine levels, blood urea, and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio in the UCB‐MSC‐Exos group | [29] |
| Allogeneic MSC‐Exos | ||||
| Pulmonary infection | Aerosol inhalation | 60 subjects aged 18–75 randomised to low‐dose, high‐dose, or placebo groups | Low and high‐dose groups received 7 doses of 8.0 × 10^8 ASC‐Exos/3 mL and 16.0 × 10^8 ASC‐Exos/3 mL, respectively | NCT04544215 |
| Acute respiratory distress syndrome | Aerosol inhalation | Subjects randomised to low, medium, and high‐dose groups receiving 2.0 × 10^8, 8.0 × 10^8, and 16.0 × 10^8 MSC‐Exos daily for 1 week | Significantly enhances the survival rate of ARDS induced by SARS‐CoV‐2 | NCT04602104 |
| MSC‐Exos | ||||
| Pancreatic cancer | Intravenous injection | 28 adults aged ≥ 18 received MSC‐Exos on days 1, 4, and 10, repeated every 14 days for up to 3 cycles | Aim to determine maximum tolerated dose and dose‐limiting toxicity | NCT03608631 |
| Macular degeneration | Local injection | 44 patients with stage 1 macular hole received 50 or 20 μg MSC‐Exos, followed for 6 months | Efficacy assessed by minimum linear diameter of the hole measured by OCT at 24 weeks post‐surgery | NCT03437759 |
| COVID‐19 | Inhalation | 30 patients aged 18–65 received 3 mL of MSC‐Exos twice daily for 10 days | Primary endpoint: adverse events 30 days post‐discharge | NCT04491240 |
6. Conclusion
In this review, we have delved into the complex mechanisms underlying the anti‐aging effects of MSC‐Exos and their burgeoning application in age‐related diseases. As our understanding of these mechanisms advances, the therapeutic use of MSC‐Exos is poised to become more precise and widely integrated into clinical practice. This deeper insight is paving the way for the development of more effective treatment strategies.
In conclusion, MSC‐Exos represent a highly promising and potent therapeutic approach for a variety of age‐related conditions. As we advance in the development and manufacturing of MSC‐Exos, it is imperative to adhere to stringent ethical standards. This commitment involves ensuring informed consent for stem cell sourcing, transparency in research, and maintaining rigorous safety and efficacy in clinical use. By integrating these ethical considerations, MSC‐Exos can be responsibly and effectively incorporated into medical practice, offering hope for a future where age‐related diseases are managed with unprecedented efficacy and respect for individual dignity. The scientific community looks forward to a forthcoming wave of rigorous research.
Author Contributions
Bohua Wei: writing – original draft, methodology, conceptualization, visualisation. Mengting Wei: writing – original draft, conceptualization, visualisation. Haonan Huang: writing – original draft, formal analysis. Ting Fan: writing – review and editing, formal analysis, software. Zhichang Zhang: writing – review and editing, supervision, software, funding acquisition, data curation, conceptualization. Xiaoyu Song: writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, conceptualization, project administration, supervision.
Ethics Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
Consent
No written consent has been obtained from the patients as there is no patient identifiable data included.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding: This work was supported by the key project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030091), the key project of The Natural Science Foundation of LiaoNing Science Foundation (2024JH2/102500016, 2023JYTMS20230135, 2022JH6/100100037, 2022JH2/20200034, 2022JH1/10400001, 2021JH2/10300023).
Bohua Wei and Mengting Wei contributed equally to this work.
The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the authors' affiliated institutions, the publisher, the editorial board, or the reviewers. The publisher expressly disclaims any endorsement of products or services mentioned within this article and does not validate any claims made by the manufacturers of such products or services.
Contributor Information
Ting Fan, Email: tfan@cmu.edu.cn.
Zhichang Zhang, Email: zczhang@cmu.edu.cn.
Xiaoyu Song, Email: xysong@cmu.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
- 1. López‐Otin C., López‐Otín C., Blasco M. A., Partridge L., Serrano M., and Kroemer G., “Hallmarks of Aging: An Expanding Universe,” Cell 186, no. 2 (2023): 243–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. International Society for Cellular Therapy Annual Meeting, Berlin, Germany, 2006 Abstracts, Cytotherapy 8, no. Suppl 1 (2006): 80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dominici M., le Blanc K., Mueller I., et al., “Minimal Criteria for Defining Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy Position Statement,” Cytotherapy 8, no. 4 (2006): 315–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Mazzella M., Walker K., Cormier C., et al., “Regulation of Self‐Renewal and Senescence in Primitive Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Wnt and TGFβ Signaling,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy 14, no. 1 (2023): 305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sarugaser R., Hanoun L., Keating A., Stanford W. L., and Davies J. E., “Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Self‐Renew and Differentiate According to a Deterministic Hierarchy,” PLoS One 4, no. 8 (2009): e6498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kahrizi M. S., Mousavi E., Khosravi A., et al., “Recent Advances in Pre‐Conditioned Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell (MSCs) Therapy in Organ Failure; a Comprehensive Review of Preclinical Studies,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 14, no. 1 (2023): 155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhou T., Yuan Z., Weng J., et al., “Challenges and Advances in Clinical Applications of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells,” Journal of Hematology and Oncology 14, no. 1 (2021): 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Boregowda S. V., Booker C. N., and Phinney D. G., “Mesenchymal Stem Cells: The Moniker Fits the Science,” Stem Cells 36, no. 1 (2018): 7–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Seo Y., Kang M., and Kim H., “Strategies to Potentiate Paracrine Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Inflammatory Diseases,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 7 (2021): 3397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Joo H. S., Suh J. H., Lee H. J., Bang E. S., and Lee J. M., “Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives on Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes as a New Therapeutic Agent,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 3 (2020): 727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Liu Z., Xu Y., Wan Y., Gao J., Chu Y., and Li J., “Exosomes From Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Prevent Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis Induced by Oxidative Stress,” Cell Death Discovery 5 (2019): 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Huang Y., Liu K., Li Q., Yao Y., and Wang Y., “Exosomes Function in Tumor Immune Microenvironment,” Advances in experimental medicine and biology 1056 (2018): 109–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ferguson S. W. and Nguyen J., “Exosomes as Therapeutics: The Implications of Molecular Composition and Exosomal Heterogeneity,” Journal of Controlled Release 228 (2016): 179–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. An Y., Lin S., Tan X., et al., “Exosomes From Adipose‐Derived Stem Cells and Application to Skin Wound Healing,” Cell Proliferation 54, no. 3 (2021): e12993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wang T., Li T., Niu X., et al., “ADSC‐Derived Exosomes Attenuate Myocardial Infarction Injury by Promoting miR‐205‐Mediated Cardiac Angiogenesis,” Biology Direct 18, no. 1 (2023): 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sivanantham A. and Jin Y., “Impact of Storage Conditions on EV Integrity/Surface Markers and Cargos,” Life 12, no. 5 (2022): 697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wu J. Y., Li Y. J., Hu X. B., Huang S., and Xiang D. X., “Preservation of Small Extracellular Vesicles for Functional Analysis and Therapeutic Applications: A Comparative Evaluation of Storage Conditions,” Drug Delivery 28, no. 1 (2021): 162–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ghafouri‐Fard S., Niazi V., Hussen B. M., Omrani M. D., Taheri M., and Basiri A., “The Emerging Role of Exosomes in the Treatment of Human Disorders With a Special Focus on Mesenchymal Stem Cells‐Derived Exosomes,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9 (2021): 653296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wu D., Chen Q., Chen X., Han F., Chen Z., and Wang Y., “The Blood‐Brain Barrier: Structure, Regulation, and Drug Delivery,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 8, no. 1 (2023): 217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mohapatra P., Gopikrishnan M., Doss C G. P., and Chandrasekaran N., “How Precise Are Nanomedicines in Overcoming the Blood‐Brain Barrier? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature,” International Journal of Nanomedicine 19 (2024): 2441–2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Phinney D. G. and Pittenger M. F., “Concise Review: MSC‐Derived Exosomes for Cell‐Free Therapy,” Stem Cells 35, no. 4 (2017): 851–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Vakhshiteh F., Atyabi F., and Ostad S. N., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes: A Two‐Edged Sword in cancer Therapy,” International Journal of Nanomedicine 14 (2019): 2847–2859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Weng Z., Zhang B., Wu C., et al., “Therapeutic Roles of Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer,” Journal of Hematology and Oncology 14, no. 1 (2021): 136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lee Y. J., Shin K. J., and Chae Y. C., “Regulation of Cargo Selection in Exosome Biogenesis and Its Biomedical Applications in Cancer,” Experimental and Molecular Medicine 56, no. 4 (2024): 877–889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Akers J. C., Gonda D., Kim R., Carter B. S., and Chen C. C., “Biogenesis of Extracellular Vesicles (EV): Exosomes, Microvesicles, Retrovirus‐Like Vesicles, and Apoptotic Bodies,” Journal of Neuro‐Oncology 113, no. 1 (2013): 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kim H. I., Park J., Zhu Y., Wang X., Han Y., and Zhang D., “Recent Advances in Extracellular Vesicles for Therapeutic Cargo Delivery,” Experimental and Molecular Medicine 56, no. 4 (2024): 836–849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dixson A. C., Dawson T. R., di Vizio D., and Weaver A. M., “Context‐Specific Regulation of Extracellular Vesicle Biogenesis and Cargo Selection,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 24, no. 7 (2023): 454–476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tang Y., Zhou Y., and Li H. J., “Advances in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes: A Review,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 12, no. 1 (2021): 71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Qiu Z., Zhong Z., Zhang Y., Tan H., Deng B., and Meng G., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal miR‐335‐5p Attenuates the Inflammation and Tubular Epithelial‐Myofibroblast Transdifferentiation of Renal Tubular Epithelial Cells by Reducing ADAM19 Protein Levels,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 13, no. 1 (2022): 373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Wang D., Na Q., Song G. Y., and Wang L., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosome‐Mediated Transfer of microRNA‐133b Boosts Trophoblast Cell Proliferation, Migration and Invasion in Preeclampsia by Restricting SGK1,” Cell Cycle 19, no. 15 (2020): 1869–1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 31. Álvarez‐Garcia V., Tawil Y., Wise H. M., and Leslie N. R., “Mechanisms of PTEN Loss in Cancer: It's All About Diversity,” Seminars in Cancer Biology 59 (2019): 66–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yao Z., Li J., Xiong H., et al., “MicroRNA Engineered Umbilical Cord Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Direct Tendon Regeneration by mTOR Signaling,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 19, no. 1 (2021): 169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Pi L., Yang L., Fang B. R., Meng X. X., and Qian L., “Exosomal microRNA‐125a‐3p From Human Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promotes Angiogenesis of Wound Healing Through Inhibiting PTEN,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 477, no. 1 (2022): 115–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yang Y., Li Y., Zhang S., Cao L., Zhang Y., and Fang B., “miR‐199a‐5p From Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes Promotes the Proliferation of Neural Stem Cells by Targeting GSK‐3β,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica Shanghai 55, no. 5 (2023): 783–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zhang L., Bai W., Peng Y., Lin Y., and Tian M., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Provide Neuroprotection in Traumatic Brain Injury Through the lncRNA TUBB6/Nrf2 Pathway,” Brain Research 1824 (2024): 148689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Yu Y., Chen M., Guo Q., et al., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome‐Derived miR‐874‐3p Targeting RIPK1/PGAM5 Attenuates Kidney Tubular Epithelial Cell Damage,” Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters 28, no. 1 (2023): 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wang Z., Gao D., Wang S., Lin H., Wang Y., and Xu W., “Exosomal microRNA‐1246 From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Potentiates Myocardial Angiogenesis in Chronic Heart Failure,” Cell Biology International 45, no. 11 (2021): 2211–2225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Xu Y., Lai Y., Cao L., et al., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells‐Derived Exosomal microRNA‐451a Represses Epithelial‐Mesenchymal Transition of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by Inhibiting ADAM10,” RNA Biology 18, no. 10 (2021): 1408–1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Li X., Liu L., Yang J., et al., “Exosome Derived From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Mediates MiR‐181c Attenuating Burn‐Induced Excessive Inflammation,” eBioMedicine 8 (2016): 72–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zhang Z., Zou X., Zhang R., et al., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal miR‐146a‐5p Reduces Microglial‐Mediated Neuroinflammation via Suppression of the IRAK1/TRAF6 Signaling Pathway After Ischemic Stroke,” Aging (Albany NY) 13, no. 2 (2021): 3060–3079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sun Y. T., Cai J. H., and Bao S., “Overexpression of lncRNA HCP5 in Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Promoted the Proliferation and Inhibited the Apoptosis of Ovarian Granulosa Cells via the Musashi RNA‐Binding Protein 2/Oestrogen Receptor Alpha 1 axis,” Endocrine Journal 69, no. 9 (2022): 1117–1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ding C., Zhu L., Shen H., et al., “Exosomal miRNA‐17‐5p Derived From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improves Ovarian Function in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency by Regulating SIRT7,” Stem Cells 38, no. 9 (2020): 1137–1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Song M., Ma L., Zhu Y., Gao H., and Hu R., “Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Inhibits Fibrosis in Human Endometrial Stromal Cells via miR‐140‐3p/FOXP1/Smad Axis,” Scientific Reports 14, no. 1 (2024): 8321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Shi Q., Wang D., Ding X., Yang X., and Zhang Y., “Exosome‐Shuttled miR‐7162‐3p From Human Umbilical Cord Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Repair Endometrial Stromal Cell Injury by Restricting APOL6,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 707 (2021): 108887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Huang Y., Chen L., Chen D., Fan P., and Yu H., “Exosomal microRNA‐140‐3p From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuates Joint Injury of Rats With Rheumatoid Arthritis by Silencing SGK1,” Molecular Medicine 28, no. 1 (2022): 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Jiao T., Huang Y., Sun H., and Yang L., “Exosomal Lnc‐CDHR Derived From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuates Peritoneal Epithelial‐Mesenchymal Transition Through AKT/FOXO Pathway,” Aging (Albany NY) 15, no. 14 (2023): 6921–6932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Gao H., Yu Z., Li Y., and Wang X., “miR‐100‐5p in Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Mediates Eosinophilic Inflammation to Alleviate Atherosclerosis via the FZD5/Wnt/β‐Catenin Pathway,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica Shanghai 53, no. 9 (2021): 1166–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Diao L. and Zhang Q., “Transfer of lncRNA UCA1 by hUCMSCs‐Derived Exosomes Protects Against Hypoxia/Reoxygenation Injury Through Impairing miR‐143‐Targeted Degradation of Bcl‐2,” Aging (Albany NY) 13, no. 4 (2021): 5967–5985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gong C., Gu Z., Zhang X., et al., “HMSCs Exosome‐Derived miR‐199a‐5p Attenuates Sulfur Mustard‐Associated Oxidative Stress via the CAV1/NRF2 Signalling Pathway,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 27, no. 15 (2023): 2165–2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Wang S., Liu T., Nan N., et al., “Exosomes From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Facilitates Injured Endometrial Restoring in Early Repair Period Through miR‐202‐3p Mediating Formation of ECM,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports 19, no. 6 (2023): 1954–1964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Du X., Li H., Han X., and Ma W., “Mesenchymal Stem Cells‐Derived Exosomal miR‐24‐3p Ameliorates Non‐alcohol Fatty Liver Disease by Targeting Keap‐1,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 637 (2022): 331–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Li L., Zhang X., and Chen Y., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome‐Derived miR‐335‐5p Alleviated Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Acute Lung Injury by Regulating the m6A Level of ITGβ4 Gene,” Current Medicinal Chemistry 31 (2024): 5448–5467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhang W., Wang Y., and Kong Y., “Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modulate miR‐126 to Ameliorate Hyperglycemia‐Induced Retinal Inflammation via Targeting HMGB1,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 60, no. 1 (2019): 294–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Zhu B., Zhang L., Liang C., et al., “Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Prevent Aging‐Induced Cardiac Dysfunction Through a Novel Exosome/lncRNA MALAT1/NF‐κB/TNF‐α Signaling Pathway,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2019 (2019): 9739258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Shao M., Xu Q., Wu Z., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Ameliorate IL‐6‐Induced Acute Liver Injury Through miR‐455‐3p,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 11, no. 1 (2020): 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Li X., Wang Y., Cai Z., Zhou Q., Li L., and Fu P., “Exosomes From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Inhibit ROS Production and Cell Apoptosis in Human Articular Chondrocytes Via the miR‐100‐5p/NOX4 Axis,” Cell Biology International 45, no. 10 (2021): 2096–2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Cai J. H., Sun Y. T., and Bao S., “HucMSCs‐Exosomes Containing miR‐21 Promoted Estrogen Production in Ovarian Granulosa Cells via LATS1‐Mediated Phosphorylation of LOXL2 and YAP,” General and Comparative Endocrinology 321 (2022): 114015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cheng F., Yang F., Wang Y., Zhou J., Qian H., and Yan Y., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal miR‐27b‐3p Alleviates Liver Fibrosis Via Downregulating YAP/LOXL2 Pathway,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 21, no. 1 (2023): 195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Liu W., Zhou N., Liu Y., et al., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome‐Derived miR‐223 Alleviates Acute Graft‐Versus‐Host Disease via Reducing the Migration of Donor T Cells,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 12, no. 1 (2021): 153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Song X. J., Zhang L., Li Q., Li Y., Ding F. H., and Li X., “hUCB‐MSC Derived Exosomal miR‐124 Promotes Rat Liver Regeneration After Partial Hepatectomy Via Downregulating Foxg1,” Life Sciences 265 (2021): 118821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Hao S. C., Ma H., Niu Z. F., Sun S. Y., Zou Y. R., and Xia H. C., “hUC‐MSCs Secreted Exosomes Inhibit the Glioma Cell Progression Through PTENP1/miR‐10a‐5p/PTEN Pathway,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 23, no. 22 (2019): 10013–10023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Lu Y., Wei Y., Shen X., et al., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Extracellular Vesicles Improve Ovarian Function in Rats With Primary Ovarian Insufficiency by Carrying miR‐145‐5p,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology 158 (2023): 103971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Huang Y., Ma J., Fan Y., and Yang L., “Mechanisms of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells‐Derived Exosomal lncRNA GAS5 in Alleviating EMT of HPMCs via Wnt/β‐Catenin Signaling Pathway,” Aging (Albany NY) 15, no. 10 (2023): 4144–4158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Yang B. C., Kuang M. J., Kang J. Y., Zhao J., Ma J. X., and Ma X. L., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Act via the miR‐1263/Mob1/Hippo Signaling Pathway to Prevent Apoptosis in Disuse Osteoporosis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 524, no. 4 (2020): 883–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Wu P., Zhang B., Han X., et al., “HucMSC Exosome‐Delivered 14‐3‐3ζ Alleviates Ultraviolet Radiation‐Induced Photodamage via SIRT1 Pathway Modulation,” Aging (Albany NY) 13, no. 8 (2021): 11542–11563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Zhang B., Shi Y., Gong A., et al., “HucMSC Exosome‐Delivered 14‐3‐3ζ Orchestrates Self‐Control of the Wnt Response via Modulation of YAP During Cutaneous Regeneration,” Stem Cells 34, no. 10 (2016): 2485–2500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Wang J., Jia H., Zhang B., et al., “HucMSC Exosome‐Transported 14‐3‐3ζ Prevents the Injury of Cisplatin to HK‐2 Cells by Inducing Autophagy In Vitro,” Cytotherapy 20, no. 1 (2018): 29–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Yang S., Liang X., Song J., et al., “A Novel Therapeutic Approach for Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Exosomes Derived From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Repair Intestinal Barrier via TSG‐6,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 12, no. 1 (2021): 315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Yan Y., Jiang W., Tan Y., et al., “hucMSC Exosome‐Derived GPX1 Is Required for the Recovery of Hepatic Oxidant Injury,” Molecular Therapy 25, no. 2 (2017): 465–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Liu P., Zhang Q., Mi J., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Stem Cells of Human Deciduous Exfoliated Teeth Inhibit Angiogenesis In Vivo and In Vitro Via the Transfer of miR‐100‐5p and miR‐1246,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 13, no. 1 (2022): 89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Yang C., Lim W., Park J., Park S., You S., and Song G., “Anti‐Inflammatory Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal microRNA‐146a‐5p and microRNA‐548e‐5p on Human Trophoblast Cells,” Molecular Human Reproduction 25, no. 11 (2019): 755–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Yuan R., Dai X., Li Y., Li C., and Liu L., “Exosomes From miR‐29a‐Modified Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduce Excessive Scar Formation by Inhibiting TGF‐β2/Smad3 Signaling,” Molecular Medicine Reports 24, no. 5 (2021): 758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Fu Y., Zhang Y. L., Liu R. Q., et al., “Exosome lncRNA IFNG‐AS1 Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Human Adipose Ameliorates Neurogenesis and ASD‐Like Behavior in BTBR Mice,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 22, no. 1 (2024): 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Qian W., Huang L., Xu Y., et al., “Hypoxic ASCs‐Derived Exosomes Attenuate Colitis by Regulating Macrophage Polarization Via miR‐216a‐5p/HMGB1 Axis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 29, no. 4 (2023): 602–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Zhang Q., Su P., Zhao F., et al., “Enhancing Skin Injury Repair: Combined Application of PF‐127 Hydrogel and hADSC‐Exos Containing miR‐148a‐3p,” ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering 10, no. 4 (2024): 2235–2250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Sun Y., Ju Y., and Fang B., “Exosomes From Human Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells Accelerate Angiogenesis in Wound Healing: Implication of the EGR‐1/lncRNA‐SENCR/DKC1/VEGF‐A Axis,” Human Cell 35, no. 5 (2022): 1375–1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Han Y., Ren J., Bai Y., Pei X., and Han Y., “Exosomes From Hypoxia‐Treated Human Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Angiogenesis Through VEGF/VEGF‐R,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology 109 (2019): 59–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Song Y., Dou H., Li X., et al., “Exosomal miR‐146a Contributes to the Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy of Interleukin‐1β‐Primed Mesenchymal Stem Cells Against Sepsis,” Stem Cells 35, no. 5 (2017): 1208–1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Yang M., Lin L., Sha C., et al., “Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal miR‐144‐5p Improves Rat Ovarian Function After Chemotherapy‐Induced Ovarian Failure by Targeting PTEN,” Laboratory Investigation 100, no. 3 (2020): 342–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Wang Y., Chen W., Zhao L., et al., “Obesity Regulates miR‐467/HoxA10 axis on Osteogenic Differentiation and Fracture Healing by BMSC‐Derived Exosome LncRNA H19,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 25, no. 3 (2021): 1712–1724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Wu T., Tian Q., Liu R., et al., “Inhibitory Role of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells‐Derived Exosome in Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer: microRNA‐30b‐5p, EZH2 and PI3K/AKT Pathway,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 27, no. 22 (2023): 3526–3538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Shen X., Qin J., Wei Z., and Liu F., “Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome‐Derived lncRNA TUC339 Influences the Progression of Osteoarthritis by Regulating Synovial Macrophage Polarization and Chondrocyte Apoptosis,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 167 (2023): 115488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Ma S., Li S., Zhang Y., et al., “BMSC‐Derived Exosomal CircHIPK3 Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of MC3T3‐E1 Cells via Mitophagy,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3 (2023): 2785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Wen L., Wang Y. D., Shen D. F., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Inhibit Neuroinflammation After Traumatic Brain Injury,” Neural Regeneration Research 17, no. 12 (2022): 2717–2724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Sun Z. L., You T., Zhang B. H., Liu Y., and Liu J., “Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes miR‐202‐5p Inhibited Pyroptosis to Alleviate Lung Ischemic‐Reperfusion Injury by Targeting CMPK2,” Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 39, no. 7 (2023): 688–698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Wang J., Wang J., Wang Y., et al., “Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells‐Derived miR‐21‐5p Protects Grafted Islets Against Apoptosis by Targeting PDCD4,” Stem Cells 41, no. 2 (2023): 169–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Wen Z., Mai Z., Zhu X., et al., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis in Hypoxic Conditions Through microRNA144 by Targeting the PTEN/AKT Pathway,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 11, no. 1 (2020): 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Chen X., Shi Y., Xue P., Ma X., Li J., and Zhang J., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal microRNA‐136‐5p Inhibits Chondrocyte Degeneration in Traumatic Osteoarthritis by Targeting ELF3,” Arthritis Research and Therapy 22, no. 1 (2020): 256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Lei B., Wu X., Xia K., Sun H., and Wang J., “Exosomal Micro‐RNA‐96 Derived From Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Inhibits Doxorubicin‐Induced Myocardial Toxicity by Inhibiting the Rac1/Nuclear Factor‐κB Signaling Pathway,” Journal of the American Heart Association 10, no. 17 (2021): e020589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Huang Y., Zhang X., Zhan J., et al., “Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal miR‐206 Promotes Osteoblast Proliferation and Differentiation in Osteoarthritis by Reducing Elf3,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 25, no. 16 (2021): 7734–7745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Li R., Zhao K., Ruan Q., Meng C., and Yin F., “Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal microRNA‐124‐3p Attenuates Neurological Damage in Spinal Cord Ischemia‐Reperfusion Injury by Downregulating Ern1 and Promoting M2 Macrophage Polarization,” Arthritis Research and Therapy 22, no. 1 (2020): 75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Xie X., Cao Y., Dai L., and Zhou D., “Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomal lncRNA KLF3‐AS1 Stabilizes Sirt1 Protein to Improve Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via miR‐206/USP22 axis,” Molecular Medicine 29, no. 1 (2023): 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Li L. and Ge J., “Exosome‐Derived lncRNA‐Ankrd26 Promotes Dental Pulp Restoration by Regulating miR‐150‐TLR4 Signaling,” Molecular Medicine Reports 25, no. 5 (2022): 152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Franceschi C., Garagnani P., Vitale G., Capri M., and Salvioli S., “Inflammaging and 'Garb‐aging',” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 28, no. 3 (2017): 199–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Li X., Li C., Zhang W., et al., “Inflammation and Aging: Signaling Pathways and Intervention Therapies,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 8, no. 1 (2023): 239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Baechle J. J., Chen N., Makhijani P., Winer S., Furman D., and Winer D. A., “Chronic Inflammation and the Hallmarks of Aging,” Molecular Metabolism 74 (2023): 101755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Stewart A. G., Thomas B., and Koff J., “TGF‐β: Master Regulator of Inflammation and Fibrosis,” Respirology 23, no. 12 (2018): 1096–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Xie M., Xiong W., She Z., et al., “Immunoregulatory Effects of Stem Cell‐Derived Extracellular Vesicles on Immune Cells,” Frontiers in Immunology 11 (2020): 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Mokarizadeh A., Delirezh N., Morshedi A., Mosayebi G., Farshid A. A., and Mardani K., “Microvesicles Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Potent Organelles for Induction of Tolerogenic Signaling,” Immunology Letters 147, no. 1–2 (2012): 47–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Liu S. J., Meng M. Y., Han S., et al., “Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Ameliorate HaCaT Cell Photo‐Aging,” Rejuvenation Research 24, no. 4 (2021): 283–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Heidari N., Abbasi‐Kenarsari H., Namaki S., et al., “Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Secreted Exosome Alleviates Dextran Sulfate Sodium‐Induced Acute Colitis by Treg Cell Induction and Inflammatory Cytokine Reduction,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 236, no. 8 (2021): 5906–5920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Nojehdehi S., Soudi S., Hesampour A., Rasouli S., Soleimani M., and Hashemi S. M., “Immunomodulatory Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes on Experimental Type‐1 Autoimmune Diabetes,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 119, no. 11 (2018): 9433–9443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Zhao H., Shang Q., Pan Z., et al., “Exosomes From Adipose‐Derived Stem Cells Attenuate Adipose Inflammation and Obesity Through Polarizing M2 Macrophages and Beiging in White Adipose Tissue,” Diabetes 67, no. 2 (2018): 235–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Padinharayil H., Varghese J., Wilson C., and George A., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes: Characteristics and Applications in Disease Pathology and Management,” Life Sciences 342 (2024): 122542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Rossiello F., Jurk D., Passos J. F., and d'Adda di Fagagna F., “Telomere Dysfunction in Ageing and Age‐Related Diseases,” Nature Cell Biology 24, no. 2 (2022): 135–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Zhang Q., Shen X., Yuan X., et al., “Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein Resists Hepatic Oxidative Stress by Regulating Lipid Droplet Homeostasis,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 3213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Tian R., Abarientos A., Hong J., et al., “Genome‐Wide CRISPRi/a Screens in Human Neurons Link Lysosomal Failure to Ferroptosis,” Nature Neuroscience 24, no. 7 (2021): 1020–1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Lee J. J., “Galangin Reverses H(2)O(2)‐induced Dermal Fibroblast Senescence via SIRT1‐PGC‐1α/Nrf2 Signaling,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3 (2022): 1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Zhang Y., Bai X., Shen K., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Diabetic Chronic Wound Healing Through SIRT3/SOD2,” Cells 11, no. 16 (2022): 2568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Bhatti F. U. R., Kim S. J., Yi A. K., Hasty K. A., and Cho H., “Cytoprotective Role of Vitamin E in Porcine Adipose‐Tissue‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Against Hydrogen‐Peroxide‐Induced Oxidative Stress,” Cell and Tissue Research 374, no. 1 (2018): 111–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Buendia I., Michalska P., Navarro E., Gameiro I., Egea J., and León R., “Nrf2‐ARE Pathway: An Emerging Target Against Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics 157 (2016): 84–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Hu Y., Tao R., Wang L., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alleviate Compression‐Induced Nucleus Pulposus Cell Apoptosis by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2021 (2021): 2310025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Huang T., Tong H., Zhou H., et al., “ADSC‐Exosomes Alleviate MTX‐Induced Rat Neuronal Damage by Activating Nrf2‐ARE Pathway,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 72, no. 6 (2022): 1334–1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Xin H. Q., Liu Z., Buller B., et al., “MiR‐17‐92 Enriched Exosomes Derived From Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Enhance Axon‐Myelin Remodeling and Motor Electrophysiological Recovery After Stroke,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 41, no. 5 (2021): 1131–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Filomeni G., De Zio D., and Cecconi F., “Oxidative Stress and Autophagy: The Clash Between Damage and Metabolic Needs,” Cell Death and Differentiation 22, no. 3 (2015): 377–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Lekli I., Haines D. D., Balla G., and Tosaki A., “Autophagy: An Adaptive Physiological Countermeasure to Cellular Senescence and Ischaemia/Reperfusion‐Associated Cardiac Arrhythmias,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 21, no. 6 (2017): 1058–1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Hu Z., Yuan Y., Zhang X., et al., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Attenuate Oxygen‐Glucose Deprivation/Reperfusion‐Induced Microglial Pyroptosis by Promoting FOXO3a‐Dependent Mitophagy,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2021, no. 1 (2021): 6219715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Lavoie H., Gagnon J., and Therrien M., “ERK Signalling: A Master Regulator of Cell Behaviour, Life and Fate,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 21, no. 10 (2020): 607–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Sun Y., Liu W. Z., Liu T., Feng X., Yang N., and Zhou H. F., “Signaling Pathway of MAPK/ERK in Cell Proliferation, Differentiation, Migration, Senescence and Apoptosis,” Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction 35, no. 6 (2015): 600–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Jiao Y. R., Chen K. X., Tang X., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Diabetes and Diabetic Complications,” Cell Death and Disease 15, no. 4 (2024): 271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Huang M., Liu Y., Zhang L., Wang S., Wang X., and He Z., “Advancements in Research on Mesenchymal Stem‐Cell‐Derived Exosomal miRNAs: A Pivotal Insight Into Aging and Age‐Related Diseases,” Biomolecules 11, no. 14 (2004): 1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Yang F., Wu Y., Chen Y., et al., “Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Ameliorate Liver Steatosis by Promoting Fatty Acid Oxidation and Reducing Fatty Acid Synthesis,” JHEP Reports 5, no. 7 (2023): 100746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Gong Z., Shu Z., Zhou Y., Chen Y., and Zhu H., “KLF2 Regulates Stemness of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Targeting FGFR3,” Biotechnic and Histochemistry 98, no. 7 (2023): 447–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Kolacz K. and Robaszkiewicz A., “PARP1 at the Crossroad of Cellular Senescence and Nucleolar Processes,” Ageing Research Reviews 94 (2024): 102206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Xie J., Wu W., Zheng L., et al., “Roles of MicroRNA‐21 in Skin Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Review,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 13 (2022): 828627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Kang H., Davis‐Dusenbery B. N., Nguyen P. H., et al., “Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 Promotes Vascular Smooth Muscle Contractility by Activating MicroRNA‐21 (miR‐21), which Down‐Regulates Expression of Family of Dedicator of Cytokinesis (DOCK) Proteins,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 287, no. 6 (2012): 3976–3986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Tan C., Song M., Stamer W. D., et al., “miR‐21‐5p: A Viable Therapeutic Strategy for Regulating Intraocular Pressure,” Experimental Eye Research 200 (2020): 108197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Yin Y., Chen H., Wang Y., Zhang L., and Wang X., “Roles of Extracellular Vesicles in the Aging Microenvironment and Age‐Related Diseases,” Journal of Extracellular Vesicles 10, no. 12 (2021): e12154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Giroud J., Bouriez I., Paulus H., Pourtier A., Debacq‐Chainiaux F., and Pluquet O., “Exploring the Communication of the SASP: Dynamic, Interactive, and Adaptive Effects on the Microenvironment,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13 (2023): 10788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Tan Q., Liang N., Zhang X., and Li J., “Dynamic Aging: Channeled Through Microenvironment,” Frontiers in Physiology 12 (2021): 702276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Ziegler D. V., Wiley C. D., and Velarde M. C., “Mitochondrial Effectors of Cellular Senescence: Beyond the Free Radical Theory of Aging,” Aging Cell 14, no. 1 (2015): 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Kevei É. and Hoppe T., “Ubiquitin Sets the Timer: Impacts on Aging and Longevity,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 21, no. 4 (2014): 290–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Wang T., Jian Z., Baskys A., et al., “MSC‐Derived Exosomes Protect Against Oxidative Stress‐Induced Skin Injury via Adaptive Regulation of the NRF2 Defense System,” Biomaterials 257 (2020): 120264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Wu Z. M. and Guan K. L., “Hippo Signaling in Embryogenesis and Development,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 46, no. 1 (2021): 51–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Zheng Y. G. and Pan D. J., “The Hippo Signaling Pathway in Development and Disease,” Developmental Cell 50, no. 3 (2019): 264–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Cao X., Luo P., Huang J., et al., “Intraarticular Senescent Chondrocytes Impair the Cartilage Regeneration Capacity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy 10, no. 1 (2019): 86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Wakale S., Wu X., Sonar Y., et al., “How Are Aging and Osteoarthritis Related?,” Aging and Disease 14, no. 3 (2023): 592–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Jiang N., Xing B., Peng R., et al., “Inhibition of Cpt1a Alleviates Oxidative Stress‐Induced Chondrocyte Senescence via Regulating Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Activating Mitophagy,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 205 (2022): 111688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Coryell P. R., Diekman B. O., and Loeser R. F., “Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications of Cellular Senescence in Osteoarthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology 17, no. 1 (2021): 47–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Rilla K., Mustonen A. M., Arasu U. T., Härkönen K., Matilainen J., and Nieminen P., “Extracellular Vesicles Are Integral and Functional Components of the Extracellular Matrix,” Matrix Biology 75 (2019): 201–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Zhang W., Bai X., Zhao B., et al., “Cell‐Free Therapy Based on Adipose Tissue Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Promotes Wound Healing via the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway,” Experimental Cell Research 370, no. 2 (2018): 333–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Kuang M. J., Huang Y., Zhao X. G., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Wharton's Jelly of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduce Osteocyte Apoptosis in Glucocorticoid‐Induced Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in Rats via the miR‐21‐PTEN‐AKT Signalling Pathway,” International Journal of Biological Sciences 15, no. 9 (2019): 1861–1871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Liu Y., Lei P., Samuel R. Z., et al., “Cadherin‐11 Increases Tumor Cell Proliferation and Metastatic Potential via Wnt Pathway Activation,” Molecular Oncology 17, no. 10 (2023): 2056–2073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Fang S., He T., Jiang J., Li Y., and Chen P., “Osteogenic Effect of tsRNA‐10277‐Loaded Exosome Derived From Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Steroid‐Induced Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy 14 (2020): 4579–4591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Abaricia J. O., Shah A. H., Chaubal M., Hotchkiss K. M., and Olivares‐Navarrete R., “Wnt Signaling Modulates Macrophage Polarization and Is Regulated by Biomaterial Surface Properties,” Biomaterials 243 (2020): 119920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Jiang K., Jiang T., Chen Y., and Mao X., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes Modulate Chondrocyte Glutamine Metabolism to Alleviate Osteoarthritis Progression,” Mediators of Inflammation 2021, no. 1 (2021): 2979124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Vonk L. A., van Dooremalen S. F. J., Liv N., et al., “Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cell‐Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Human Cartilage Regeneration in Vitro,” Theranostics 8, no. 4 (2018): 906–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Millis A. J., Hoyle M., McCue H. M., and Martini H., “Differential Expression of Metalloproteinase and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase Genes in Aged Human Fibroblasts,” Experimental Cell Research 201, no. 2 (1992): 373–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Cooper S. J. and Bowden G. T., “Ultraviolet B Regulation of Transcription Factor Families: Roles of Nuclear Factor‐Kappa B (NF‐kappaB) and Activator Protein‐1 (AP‐1) in UVB‐Induced Skin Carcinogenesis,” Current Cancer Drug Targets 7, no. 4 (2007): 325–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Fisher G. J., Datta S. C., Talwar H. S., et al., “Molecular Basis of Sun‐Induced Premature Skin Ageing and Retinoid Antagonism,” Nature 379, no. 6563 (1996): 335–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Wlaschek M., Maity P., Makrantonaki E., and Scharffetter‐Kochanek K., “Connective Tissue and Fibroblast Senescence in Skin Aging,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 141, no. 4S (2021): 985–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Li M., Li X., Liu B., et al., “Time‐Resolved Extracellular Matrix Atlas of the Developing Human Skin Dermis,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9 (2021): 783456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Burk J., Sassmann A., Kasper C., Nimptsch A., and Schubert S., “Extracellular Matrix Synthesis and Remodeling by Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Is Context‐Sensitive,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3 (2022): 1758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Ju Y., Hu Y., Yang P., Xie X., and Fang B., “Extracellular Vesicle‐Loaded Hydrogels for Tissue Repair and Regeneration,” Materials Today Bio 18 (2023): 100522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Zhang B., Shen L., Shi H., et al., “Exosomes From Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Identification, Purification, and Biological Characteristics,” Stem Cells International 2016 (2016): 1929536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Groban L., Pailes N. A., Bennett C. D. L., et al., “Growth Hormone Replacement Attenuates Diastolic Dysfunction and Cardiac Angiotensin II Expression in Senescent Rats,” Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 61, no. 1 (2006): 28–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Liberale L., Montecucco F., Schwarz L., Lüscher T. F., and Camici G. G., “Inflammation and Cardiovascular Diseases: Lessons From Seminal Clinical Trials,” Cardiovascular Research 117, no. 2 (2021): 411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Walaszczyk A., Dookun E., Redgrave R., et al., “Pharmacological Clearance of Senescent Cells Improves Survival and Recovery in Aged Mice Following Acute Myocardial Infarction,” Aging Cell 18, no. 3 (2019): e12945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Bloom S. I., Islam M. T., Lesniewski L. A., and Donato A. J., “Mechanisms and Consequences of Endothelial Cell Senescence,” Nature Reviews Cardiology 20, no. 1 (2023): 38–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Yan W., Xia Y., Zhao H., Xu X., Ma X., and Tao L., “Stem Cell‐Based Therapy in Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction: Promise, Challenges, and Future Directions,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 188 (2024): 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Li J., Xue H., Li T., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells Attenuate the Progression of Atherosclerosis in ApoE(−/−) Mice via miR‐let7 Mediated Infiltration and Polarization of M2 Macrophage,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 510, no. 4 (2019): 565–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Yan F., Cui W., and Chen Z., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Derived Exosome‐Loaded microRNA‐129‐5p Inhibits TRAF3 Expression to Alleviate Apoptosis and Oxidative Stress in Heart Failure,” Cardiovascular Toxicology 22, no. 7 (2022): 631–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Yu H., Pan Y., Dai M., Wang X., and Chen H., “Mesenchymal Stem Cell‐Originated Exosomal Lnc A2M‐AS1 Alleviates Hypoxia/Reperfusion‐Induced Apoptosis and Oxidative Stress in Cardiomyocytes,” Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 37, no. 5 (2023): 891–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Wang Y., Ding N., Guan G., et al., “Rapid Delivery of Hsa‐miR‐590‐3p Using Targeted Exosomes to Treat Acute Myocardial Infarction Through Regulation of the Cell Cycle,” Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology 14, no. 5 (2018): 968–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Li W., Liu Y., Zhang P., et al., “Tissue‐Engineered Bone Immobilized With Human Adipose Stem Cells‐Derived Exosomes Promotes Bone Regeneration,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 10, no. 6 (2018): 5240–5254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. He J. G., Li H. R., Han J. X., et al., “GATA‐4‐Expressing Mouse Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Cardiac Function After Myocardial Infarction via Secreted Exosomes,” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1 (2018): 9047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Lovell M. A., Gabbita S. P., and Markesbery W. R., “Increased DNA Oxidation and Decreased Levels of Repair Products in Alzheimer's Disease Ventricular CSF,” Journal of Neurochemistry 72, no. 2 (1999): 771–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Weissman L., Jo D. G., Sorensen M. M., et al., “Defective DNA Base Excision Repair in Brain From Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment,” Nucleic Acids Research 35, no. 16 (2007): 5545–5555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Banarase T. A., Sammeta S. S., Wankhede N. L., et al., “Mitophagy Regulation in Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease,” Biophysical Reviews 15, no. 2 (2023): 239–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Gao X., Chen Q., Yao H., et al., “Epigenetics in Alzheimer's Disease,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 14 (2022): 911635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Allen W. E., Blosser T. R., Sullivan Z. A., Dulac C., and Zhuang X., “Molecular and Spatial Signatures of Mouse Brain Aging at Single‐Cell Resolution,” Cell 186, no. 1 (2023): 194–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Nakano M., Kubota K., Kobayashi E., et al., “Bone Marrow‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Cognitive Impairment in an Alzheimer's Disease Model by Increasing the Expression of microRNA‐146a in Hippocampus,” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1 (2020): 10772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. El Bassit G., Patel R. S., Carter G., et al., “MALAT1 in Human Adipose Stem Cells Modulates Survival and Alternative Splicing of PKCδII in HT22 Cells,” Endocrinology 158, no. 1 (2017): 183–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Nazimek K., Filipczak‐Bryniarska I., and Bryniarski K., “The Role of Medicaments, Exosomes and miRNA Molecules in Modulation of Macrophage Immune Activity,” Postȩpy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej (Online) 69 (2015): 1114–1129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Liu S., Fan M., Xu J. X., et al., “Exosomes Derived From Bone‐Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Alleviate Cognitive Decline in AD‐Like Mice by Improving BDNF‐Related Neuropathology,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 19, no. 1 (2022): 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. He S., Wang Q., Chen L., He Y. J., Wang X., and Qu S., “miR‐100a‐5p‐Enriched Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance the Anti‐Oxidant Effect in a Parkinson's Disease Model via Regulation of Nox4/ROS/Nrf2 Signaling,” Journal of Translational Medicine 21, no. 1 (2023): 747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Jahangard Y., Monfared H., Moradi A., Zare M., Mirnajafi‐Zadeh J., and Mowla S. J., “Therapeutic Effects of Transplanted Exosomes Containing miR‐29b to a Rat Model of Alzheimer's Disease,” Frontiers in Neuroscience 14 (2020): 564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Wang J., Teng Y., Zhao G., et al., “Exosome‐Mediated Delivery of Inducible miR‐423‐5p Enhances Resistance of MRC‐5 Cells to Rabies Virus Infection,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 7 (2019): 1537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Kwon H. H., Yang S. H., Lee J., et al., “Combination Treatment With Human Adipose Tissue Stem Cell‐Derived Exosomes and Fractional CO2 Laser for Acne Scars: A 12‐Week Prospective, Double‐Blind, Randomized, Split‐Face Study,” Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 100, no. 18 (2020): adv00310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
