Skip to main content
BMC Rheumatology logoLink to BMC Rheumatology
. 2025 May 23;9:58. doi: 10.1186/s41927-025-00511-0

A six-month weight loss intervention is associated with significant changes in serum biomarkers related to inflammation, bone and cartilage metabolism in obese patients with psoriatic arthritis and matched controls

Linda Torres 1,2,, Charlotte A Jonsson 1, Björn Eliasson 3, Helena Forsblad-d’Elia 1,2, Anton J Landgren 1,4, Annelie Bilberg 5,6, Inger Gjertsson 1,2, Ingrid Larsson 7, Eva Klingberg 1,2
PMCID: PMC12100911  PMID: 40410839

Abstract

Background

Obesity is highly overrepresented in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and associated with increased disease activity and inferior treatment outcome. We have previously reported in 41 patients with PsA and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 33 kg/m2 that weight loss treatment with Very Low Energy Diet (VLED) resulted in a median weight loss of 18,6% and concomitantly a significant improvement in C-reactive protein (CRP) and disease activity at six months (M6). This sub-study analyzes the effects on serum biomarkers associated with inflammation, bone and cartilage metabolism in the same PsA patients and matched controls.

Methods

Patients and controls received VLED treatment (640 kcal/day) during 12–16 weeks depending on baseline (BL) BMI < 40 or ≥ 40 kg/m2, followed by an energy restricted diet. Serum was collected at BL and M6, and biomarkers were measured with Magnetic Luminex® Assays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Nonparametric statistics and paired comparison tests were used.

Results

In the PsA patients, the following proteins were significantly reduced at M6 as compared to BL: hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (median (first-third quartile) 327.9 (250.3-413.6) pg/mL vs. 271.3 (206.9–331.0) pg/mL, p < 0.01), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (79.6 (55.9-113.5) pg/mL vs. 69.6 (53.1-105.3) pg/mL, p = 0.01), B-cell activating factor (BAFF) (794.4 (716.4-868.3) pg/mL vs. 674.6 (613.2-790.5) pg/mL, p = 0.01) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) (266.1 (209.9–366.0) ng/mL vs. 217.0 (156.0-272.0) ng/mL, p < 0.01), whereas carboxyterminal telopeptide of type-1 collagen (CTX-1) was significantly increased (268.0 (196.0-378.5) pg/mL vs. 508.0 (350.0-640.0) pg/mL, p < 0.01). Similar results were found in the control group.

Conclusions

Weight loss was associated with reduced levels of serum biomarkers related to inflammation and cartilage degradation, and increased biomarkers for bone resorption. The study supports the strong relationship between obesity, inflammation, bone and cartilage metabolism, identifying BMI as a possible confounder for biomarker levels.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02917434, registered on September 21, 2016, retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-025-00511-0.

Keywords: Biomarkers, Inflammation, Bone remodeling, Psoriatic arthritis, Obesity, Weight loss

Background

The inflammatory skin disease psoriasis (PsO) affects 2–3% of the population in the western world. Approximately 20–30% of these individuals develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a systemic condition manifested by a combination of peripheral arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, and dactylitis [1]. A key feature of PsA is pathological bone remodeling affecting not only the mechanism of bone loss but also of bone formation. Nearly half of the patients develop bone erosions in the first two years of disease, and 20% of patients with polyarticular involvement exhibit a severe joint destructive disease [2]. New bone formation causes abnormal calcification in the entheses, spine and peripheral joints.

Obesity is a global health care problem with a strong association to PsA. Excess body weight is an established risk factor for the development of PsO in the general population, and increases the risk of PsA among patients with PsO [3]. A high body mass index (BMI) is linked with increased PsA disease activity and less favorable treatment outcomes, while weight reduction is connected to improvement of the disease [4, 5]. Weight gain and obesity appear to generate a phenotype shift of the white adipose tissue compared to lean individuals, switching the normal well-balanced immune cell homeostasis to a dysfunctional state of chronic low-grade inflammation. Activated macrophages accumulate in the expanding adipose tissue, acting as key mediators for the recruitment of other immune cells and contributing to both a local and a systemic inflammatory response [6, 7]. Traditionally, obesity has been viewed as beneficial for bone structure strength, mainly through the mechanism of mechanical loading. More recent studies have reported negative effects from excessive fat mass on bone mineral density (BMD) and negative influence of systemic inflammation on markers of bone remodeling [8]. The interaction between obesity and bone metabolism is not fully understood [9], and the impact of weight loss on bone in obese PsA patients has not been previously studied.

Further research is needed to understand the complex pathogenesis of PsA and biomarkers have been identified as a relevant research gap [10]. We have already demonstrated that weight reduction with Very Low Energy Diet (VLED) improved parameters of disease activity in patients with PsA and obesity [11]. The same study provided the opportunity to explore the effects on biomarkers related to inflammatory and immunologic processes, bone and cartilage metabolism associated with rheumatologic diseases in previous studies.

The aim of this sub-study was to investigate how weight loss treatment with VLED corresponds with levels of serum biomarkers associated with inflammatory processes, bone and cartilage remodeling in patients with PsA compared to matched controls. The objective was to provide new insights into the interplay between obesity, inflammation, bone and cartilage remodeling in PsA.

Methods

This is an open prospective interventional study conducted at the Department of Rheumatology and the Regional Obesity Center at Sahlgrenska University hospital in Gothenburg in Western Sweden.

Patients and controls

Patients with PsA and obesity registered at the Rheumatology clinic of Sahlgrenska University hospital and the rheumatology units at the hospitals of Alingsås and Borås were invited to participate. Eligible for inclusion were patients with PsA fulfilling the Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria [12], with a BMI ≥ 33 kg/m2 and 25–75 years of age. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, porphyria, epilepsy, type 1 diabetes, severe heart, kidney or catabolic disease, severe binge eating disorder, current treatment with warfarin, lithium or phenytoin, mental imbalance affecting participation, heart infarction, stroke, major surgery or trauma during last the three months, or cancer treatment during the last five years. Background treatment with conventional synthetic and/or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cs and/or bDMARDs) had to be constant from three months prior to baseline (BL) until six months after baseline (M6). Recruited as controls were 39 patients with obesity, matched for sex, age and body weight to the PsA patients, already planned for VLED treatment at the Regional Obesity Center at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. In addition to exclusion criteria already accounted for, the controls were excluded if having PsO, PsA or any other inflammatory rheumatic disease. All participants in the study gave their written informed consent. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in Gothenburg (approval number 901 − 15) and carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02917434.

The intervention

A structured weight loss treatment was provided within a 12-month protocol including support and medical follow-up from a team of doctors, nurses and dietitians at the Regional Obesity Centre of the Region Western Sweden at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, as described before [11]. The VLED used in the present study provided a daily intake of 640 kcal including recommended doses of vitamins, minerals and other essential nutrients (Cambridge Weight Plan Limited, Corby, UK). All participants followed an initial period of 12 or 16 weeks on strict VLED, based on pre-treatment BMI (< 40 or ≥ 40 kg/m2). Following the VLED period, food was gradually reintroduced during a period of 12 weeks, during which each participant received personal dietary advice on a healthy, energy-restricted diet. All participants were seen by a physiotherapist at BL and after six and twelve months and were promoted to engage in health enhancing physical activity during at least 150 min per week.

Physical assessment

Study visits for PsA patients and controls were carried out at the Clinical Rheumatologic Research Unit at Sahlgrenska University Hospital at BL, after three months and at M6. BMI was calculated. Patients with PsA had the joints evaluated with 66/68 swollen/tender joints count and the entheses according to Leeds enthesitis index [13]. PsA disease activity was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS) for global disease activity. Function and activity limitations were determined using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) [14]. Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts based on C-reactive protein (DAS28CRP) and the Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) score were calculated [15, 16]. Minimal disease activity (MDA) was defined as fulfilling five of seven pre-specified criteria [17].

Biomarkers

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a multi-functional cytokine generating a variety of inflammatory and immune responses, including cytokine production, antigen presentation and T cell effector function [18].

Vascular endothelial factor (VEGF) is a potent signaling protein involved in angiogenesis, an important mechanism of chronic inflammatory disorders. VEGF also plays critical roles in skeletal development, bone repair and regeneration [19].

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) comprise a family of zinc-dependent enzymes that participate in numerous biological processes such as bone remodeling and several aspects of immunity. MMPs also have an important role in pathological processes such as chronic inflammation and tissue destruction [20].

B-cell activating factor (BAFF) participates in B-lymphocyte survival and B- and T-cell maturation [21]. Although PsO and PsA are considered T cell driven diseases, the complex immunologic interplay with B cells have not been defined.

S100A8 and S100A9 compose a heterocomplex also known as calprotectin. Secreted by activated phagocytes such as neutrophilic granulocytes and monocytes, calprotectin acts as a promotor of the inflammatory response [22].

Osteocalcin constitutes the most abundant non-collagenous component of bone. Besides serving as a marker for bone disorders, osteocalcin has also been widely investigated for its regulatory functions on energy metabolism [23].

Soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) is a cytokine exhibiting multiple effects on bone metabolism and the immune system. The ratio of RANKL and decoy receptor osteprotegerin (OPG) is considered a major determinant for bone mass turnover [24].

Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) is proposed to be a master regulator of the osteoblast-osteoclast axis by inhibiting of the Wnt signaling pathway. Vast evidence imply that elevated Dkk-1 expression contributes to the pathogenesis of erosive bone disorders such as PsA [25].

Sclerostin (SOST) inhibits bone formation mediated by the Wnt-signaling pathway and have an important role in the adaptive response to mechanical loading in bone [26].

Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein expressed primarily in cartilage tissue and its release pattern reflects cartilage turnover [27].

Carboxyterminal telopeptide of type-1 collagen (CTX-1) are peptide fragments generated by collagen degradation, serving as important biochemical markers of bone resorption [28].

Laboratory assessment

Sera were obtained from the participants in the morning after ≥ 8 h of fasting and stored at -80 °C. CRP was analyzed using standard laboratory techniques at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Serum (two-fold dilution) levels were analyzed for HGF, VEGF, S100A8, S100A9, MMP-3, MMP-8, BAFF, Dkk-1, SOST, RANKL, and OPG with Human Magnetic Luminex® Assays (R&D Systems). The Luminex® assays were analyzed using a Bio-Plex 200 system (BioRad) with five-parameter logistic standard curves. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure serum COMP (Human COMP Quantikine ELISA kit, R&D Systems, serum diluted 1:100), CTX-1 (Serum Crosslaps® (CTX-1) ELISA, Immunodiagnostics systems (IDS), serum undiluted), and osteocalcin (N-MID Osteocalcin ELISA, IDS, serum undiluted). The ELISA plates were analyzed using a Spectramax 340PC384 Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices), and the program SoftMax Pro 5.4.1 with a 4-parameter curve fit was used. All assays were run according to the instructions of the manufacturers.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics are presented as numbers (%), median and first-third quartile (Q1-Q3). For comparisons between groups the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test for categorical variables. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare continuous related samples. Correlations were calculated using Spearman’s correlation (rs). All tests were two-tailed and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were made using SPSS Statistics version 28.0.1.0 and 29.0.0.0 (IBM, Chicago, USA).

Results

Patients and controls characteristics at baseline

Forty-six patients were included in the study. Three patients cancelled participation before follow-up at M6, one patient was excluded due to depression, and one due to pregnancy. A total number of 41 patients and 39 controls completed the intervention and the six-month evaluation. The patient group had a median BL age of 54 (Q1-Q3 49–62) years, and 63% were women. The control group consisted of 39 individuals with a median age of 55 (Q1-Q3 46–60) years, and 72% were women. They were matched with the patients for sex, age and body weight. A comparison of BL characteristics of the PsA patients and controls is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with psoriatic arthritis and controls at baseline

Patients
N = 41
Controls
N = 39
p-value
Women, n (%) 26 (63) 28 (72) 0.42
Age, years 54 (49–62) 55 (46–60) 0.46
Body height, cm 168 (162–177) 166 (162–172) 0.19
Body weight, kg 106 (96–114) 105 (97–120) 0.69
BMI, kg/m2 35 (34–38) 38 (37–42) < 0.01
Waist circumference, cm 116 (112–122) 117 (107–126) 0.82
Current smoking, n (%) 1 (2) 2 (5) 0.53
PsO duration, years 32 (19–40)
PsA duration, years 17 (11–27)
PsA peripheral disease 35 (85)
SJC 66, score 0 (0–1)
TJC 68, score 4 (1–14)
VAS pain, mm 30 (19–63)
MDA, n (%) 12 (29.3)
DAPSA, score 15.3 (6.6–29.1)
DAS28CRP, score 2.9 (2.1–3.7)
NSAID, n (%) 26 (63)
csDMARD without biologic, n (%) 17 (41)
Methotrexate, n (%) 24 (59)
Sulfasalazine, n (%) 4 (10)
Leflunomide, n (%) 1 (2)
Azathioprine, n (%) 1 (2)
Prednisone, n (%) 3 (7)
TNFi all, n (%) 13 (32)
TNFi monotherapy, n (%) 3 (7)
TNFi + csDMARD, n (%) 10 (24)
Ustekinumab monotherapy, n (%) 1 (2)
Apremilast, n (%) 1 (2)

Bold value in table 1 is to highlight a significant difference in BMI between patients and controls

Figures are number (%) or median and first quartile to third quartile (Q1-Q3). Values in bold are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). BMI: body mass index; PsO: psoriasis; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; SJC: swollen joint count; TJC: tender joint count; VAS: visual analogue scale; MDA: minimal disease activity; DAPSA: disease activity in psoriatic arthritis; DAS28CRP: disease activity score using 28 joint counts based on c-reactive protein; NSAID: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug; TNFi: tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.

Baseline serum biomarker levels and measures of disease activity

At BL, BAFF correlated positively with tender joint count 68 (rs=0.44,p < 0.01), DAS28CRP (rs=0.54,p < 0.01), HAQ (rs=0.45,p < 0.01), Leeds enthesitis score (rs=0.36,p = 0.02) and DAPSA score (rs=0.49,p < 0.01). RANKL correlated positively with number of tender joints 68 (rs=0.39,p = 0.01) and DAPSA score (rs=0.34,p = 0.04). Twelve patients (29%) fulfilled criteria for MDA at BL (Table 1). BAFF was the only biomarker associated with MDA at BL (683.3(603.3-788.3)pg/mL(n = 12) vs. 815.4(732.0-919.0)pg/mL(n = 29),p = 0.01).

Serum levels of biomarkers at month 6 in patients and controls

Six months after the initiation of VLED treatment, the median weight loss for the 41 PsA patients was 18.9 (Q1-Q3 15.0-26.5)kg or 19% [1526], corresponding with the weight reduction achieved in the control group, 22.6 (Q1-Q3 14.8–28.5)kg or 20% [1427]. At M6 significant decreases as compared to BL were found for the PsA patients in serum HGF (p < 0.01), BAFF (p < 0.01), together with VEGF, S100A8, MMP-8, COMP and Dkk-1, while there was an increase in CTX-1 and SOST (Table 2). The weight loss in the control group was similarly associated with statistically significant reductions in serum HGF, VEGF, BAFF, S100A8, MMP-3, COMP, Dkk-1, and an increase in CTX-1 and SOST (Table 2). At M6, 54% of the PsA patients had reached MDA. SOST was the single biomarker associated with MDA at M6 (62.3(36.6–65.9)pg/mL(n = 19) vs. (58.7(36.1–88.9)pg/mL(n = 22)p = 0.02).

Table 2.

Comparison of patients with psoriatic arthritis and controls at baseline and 6-month follow-up

Patients
N = 41
Controls
N = 39
Patients vs. controls
p-value
BL M6 p-value BL M6 p-value BL M6

BMI

(kg/m2)

35.2

(34.1–38.1)

29.8

(26.6–31.5)

< 0.01

37.7

(36.7–41.5)

30.4

(27.9–33.2)

< 0.01 < 0.01 0.11

CRP

(mg/L)

4.0

(2.0-8.5)

3.00

(1.5–6.5)

0.04

4.00

(2.0–6.0)

2.00

(1.0–4.0)

< 0.01 0.28 0.05

HGF

(pg/mL)

327.9 (250.3-413.6)

271.3

(206.9–331.0)

< 0.01 307.9 (239.1-348.2)

239.8

(200.3–276.0)

< 0.01 0.40 0.10

VEGF

(pg/mL)

79.6

(55.9-113.5)

69.6

(53.1-105.3)

0.01

82.3

(48.0-125.9)

65.0

(42.2–85.5)

< 0.01 0.96 0.31
S100A8 (pg/mL)

75.5

(48.0-99.5)

63.3

(42.8–93.6)

0.02

71.8

(40.5–101.0)

63.3

(40.3–85.7)

< 0.01 0.60 0.62
S100A9 (pg/mL) 388.7 (249.2-507.6)

348.8

(249.1-515.7)

0.37 335.3 (262.5-435.1)

308.0

(214.6-394.7)

0.37 0.26 0.18
MMP-3 (µg/mL)

14.3

(9.5–22.0)

12.48

(8.2–19.7)

0.42

13.2

(10.0-18.5)

12.3

(9.3–15.8)

0.02 0.73 0.60
MMP-8 (ng/mL)

10.0

(6.8–14.2)

9.2

(5.8–12.0)

0.02

7.5

(4.8–12.6)

7.2

(3.5–9.8)

0.11 0.051 0.047

BAFF

(pg/mL)

794.4 (716.4-868.3)

674.6

(613.2-790.5)

< 0.01 760.8 (664.1-827.3)

678.1

(603.7-719.8)

< 0.01 0.17 0.49

COMP

(ng/mL)

266.1 (209.9–366.0)

217.0

(156.0-272.0)

0.01 293.6 (185.2-340.5)

221.6

(163.5–300.0)

0.02 0.95 0.73

Dkk-1

(ng/mL)

3.6

(3.1–4.4)

3.4

(2.8–4.2)

< 0.01

3.6

(3.2–4.4)

3.5

(2.9–4.1)

< 0.01 0.88 0.93

SOST

(pg/mL)

52.9

(32.5–65.4)

60.3

(37.2–85.6)

0.01

50.0

(30.8–79.3)

61.3

(35.7–81.4)

0.02 0.92 0.91

CTX-1

(pg/mL)

268.0 (196.0-378.5)

508.0

(350.0-644.0)

< 0.01 226.0 (160.0-338.0)

499.0

(301.0-610.0)

< 0.01 0.12 0.30

OPG

(pg/mL)

797.0 (682.1–1037.0)

822.8

(680.1–966.0)

0.23 822.9 (699.0-948.1)

754.1

(643.0-904.3)

0.061 0.62 0.24
RANKL (pg/mL)

31.3

(17.4–47.1)

29.42

(18.6–44.8)

0.75

28.8

(23.6–44.1)

29.9

(19.8–36.0)

0.02 0.76 0.70
Osteocalcin

12.51

(9.68–16.92)

15.46

(10.63–18.71)

0.06

10.65

(8.23–15.46)

12.80

(9.24–17.82)

0.07 0.10 0.22

Figures are median and first to third quartile (Q1-Q3). Values in bold are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). BMI: body mass index; CRP: c-reactive protein; HGF: hepatocyte growth factor; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; MMP-3: matrix metalloproteinase 3; MMP-8: matrix metalloproteinase 8; BAFF B-cell activating factor; COMP: cartilage oligomeric matrix protein; Dkk-1: dickkopf-1; SOST: sclerostin; CTX-1: carboxy-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type 1 collagen; OPG: osteoprotegerin; RANKL: receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand

Figure 1 illustrates the biomarkers with significant delta values from BL to M6 found in the PsA patients, compared with the controls. Figure 2 highlights the changes in CTX-1 serum levels in relation to delta BMI (∆BMI) in both groups.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Significant change (%) in serum levels of biomarkers from baseline to month six

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Change in CTX-1 between baseline and month six in relation to delta body mass index

Change in serum levels of biomarker in relation to PsA disease activity at month 6

The reduction in BMI correlated positively with ∆CRP. The decrease of MMP-8 correlated with a significant improvement of swollen joint counts 66. The bone resorption biomarker ∆CTX-1 had an inverse correlation with the ∆values of BMI, swollen joint count 66 and DAS28CRP activity score. ∆RANKL was positively associated with improvement in ∆DAS28CRP score. Table 3 depicts the ∆values of biomarkers with at least one significant correlation to the ∆values of PsA disease activity parameters. The magnitude of ∆values of the biomarkers were similar in patients and controls.

Table 3.

Changes in biomarkers, body mass index and disease activity in 41 patients with psoriatic arthritis

∆BMI
(kg/m2)
∆Swollen joint count 66
(score)
∆Tender joint count 68
(score)
∆DAS28CRP
(score)
∆BSA
(score)
DAPSA
(score)

∆CRP

(mg/L)

rs

p-value

0.34

0.03

0.02

0.89

-0.20

0.22

0.13

0.42

0.14

0.39

-0.11

0.48

∆MMP-8

(ng/mL)

rs

p-value

0.15

0.35

0.39

0.01

0.07

0.64

0.07

0.68

0.06

0.72

0.10

0.52

∆CTX1

(pg/mL)

rs

p-value

-0.39

0.01

-0.35

0.03

-0.06

0.71

-0.45

< 0.01

-0.30

0.06

-0.19

0.25

∆RANKL

(pg/mL)

rs

p-value

0.31

0.06

-0.06

0.72

0.32

0.05

0.35

0.03

0.13

0.42

0.30

0.06

Values in bold are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). CRP: c-reactive protein; MMP-8: matrix metalloproteinase 8; CTX-1: carboxy-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type 1 collagen; RANKL: receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand; BMI: body mass index; DAS28CRP: disease activity score using 28 joint counts based on c-reactive protein; BSA: body surface area; DAPSA: disease activity in psoriatic arthritis

Discussion

In this prospective, open intervention study we analyzed the effects of weight loss with a VLED regimen on serum biomarkers reflecting inflammation, bone and cartilage metabolism in patients with PsA and obesity and matched controls. All biomarkers were included in each of the analyzes. Non-significant findings are not always described in the results. Discrepancy in BMI at BL is explained by an otherwise non-significant difference in body height. At M6 the patients displayed significant reductions of serum biomarkers CRP, HGF, VEGF, MMP-8, BAFF, S100A8, COMP and Dkk-1, whereas serum SOST and CTX-1 were increased. Similar changes in biomarker levels were seen in the control group. Irrespective of the group, weight loss led to a reduction in pro-inflammatory molecules, a decrease in biomarkers of cartilage degradation and an increase in biomarkers reflecting bone resorption.

The results showed that weight loss treatment was associated with decreases in serum HGF in both PsA patients and controls. Previous research on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have demonstrated elevated HGF levels in serum, synovium, synovial fluid and joint adipose tissue, and that above-median levels of plasma HGF predicted progress in radiographic joint damage [29, 30]. HGF serum levels were significantly reduced after weight reduction through bariatric surgery [31]. The lowering of serum HGF in the current study could likely be primarily related to a depletion of adipose tissue, and may also reflect an alleviation of mechanical stress on the joints and reduced inflammatory activity.

The weight loss was accompanied by a decrease in serum VEGF in both PsA patients and controls. Ramonda et al. described significantly higher serum VEGF levels in PsA patients compared to matched healthy controls [32]. Elevated VEGF levels have been observed in obese men and women, highly correlating with BMI [33].

In the present study MMP-8 was significantly reduced in the PsA patients and ΔMMP-8 levels correlated with improvement of swollen joint count. Mattey et al. reported that MMP-8 had a strong association with disease activity and worse function in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [34]. Otherwise, there are few previous studies on MMP-8 and arthritis. Bariatric surgery has been associated with a significant reduction of MMP-8 levels, correlating with lowered serum leptin [35].

VLED treatment was associated with a significant reduction of BAFF in both the PsA patients and the control group. We found correlations between serum BAFF and several disease activity parameters at BL. However, following weight loss, ΔBAFF did not correlate with change in disease activity variables. Previous studies on PsA and PsO patients have shown that interleukin (IL)-10-producing regulatory B cells (Bregs) were decreased and inversely correlated with T helper (Th) 17 and Th 1 cells compared with healthy controls [36]. Conigliaro et al. reported improvement of joint activity along with increased levels of peripheral blood B cells from TNFi treatment in both RA and PsA patients [37]. BAFF has been proposed to function as a regulator of adipokines and a possible mediator between adipocytes and macrophages [38]. Further studies on BAFF in relation to obesity and weight loss in other rheumatic diseases such as SLE and RA could be of interest.

In our study, weight reduction resulted in a significant decrease of S100A8 in both the PsA patient and the control group. There was no correlation with S100A8/S100A9 and PsA disease parameters. Previously, conflicting results have been shown regarding serum calprotectin levels and PsA disease activity. In a study on 1729 subjects with RA, axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and PsA by Jarlborg et al., serum calprotectin levels correlated positively with disease activity in RA and axSpA, but not in PsA [39]. In contrast, a recent Italian study demonstrated a correlation between serum calprotectin and ultrasound-detected synovitis in early PsA [40].

Sclerostin increased after weight loss treatment in both the patient and the control group. In line with our results, a study by Muschitz et al. have demonstrated an increase in sclerostin and CTX1 in obese women after bariatric surgery [41]. Research have indicated that patients with AS exhibit an impaired SOST expression, and a low serum level has been linked to persistent inflammation and formation of new syndesmophytes [42]. The outcome could indicate bone loss due to the adaptive response to lessened mechanical loading but may also be an effect of reduced pathological bone remodeling.

Dkk-1 was reduced in response to weight loss treatment in both the PsA patient and control group. While our study found no significant difference in serum levels of Dkk-1 between the patient and the control group, previous studies have reported inconsistent results [43, 44]. Wnt signaling has been suggested to have fundamental roles in the development of adipose tissue by influencing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells [45]. A previous study also proposed that Dkk-1 is secreted by human preadipocytes and functions as a promoter of adipogenesis. Inhibition of Wnt signaling promotes adipogenic differentiation [46]. Hence, our findings could be associated with the reduction of adipose tissue.

Previous studies on COMP and PsA are inconclusive [47, 48]. Studies on osteoarthritis have acknowledged a sensitivity of COMP to mechanical loading [49]. The significant decrease of serum COMP in both patients and controls could most likely be related to the reduction of mechanical stress on cartilage.

Grisar et al. reported higher CTX-1 levels in PsA patients compared to controls, and significant correlations between CTX-1 and inflammatory markers, as well as PsA disease duration [50]. In our study, CTX-1 levels increased in response to weight loss in both PsA patients and the control group. ∆CTX1 correlated with a significant improvement of swollen joint count 66 and DAS28CRP score. The findings suggest an increase in bone resorption following weight loss therapy, in agreement with the results from the previously mentioned study, reporting increased CTX-1 levels after bariatric surgery [41]. Long-term studies on CTX-1 after weight loss and its relation to bone loss and increased fracture risk could be of interest.

Limitations and strengths

The findings in this study should be interpreted in light of some limitations. This is not a randomized trial. However, a control group of individuals without PsA, matched for age, sex and weight, subjected to the same VLED treatment was included in the study. Treatment with cs/bDMARD could be a confounding factor. Patients exhibiting a more severe disease receive more intense treatment, which possibly could affect the biomarkers. Low disease activity could taper the effects of the weight reduction on symptoms of disease activity in the patient group. The Leeds enthesitis score is a simple and common method to assess enthesitis, but is limited by few examination points and the inability to distinguish between tenderness and inflammation. There was a difference in BMI at BL due to an otherwise non-significant difference in body height between the patient and control group. The effects on serum biomarkers and disease activity variables could be altered by the state of temporary starvation. Also, biomarkers S100A8, RANKL and SOST were expressed at very low levels, and serum levels determined from an extrapolated part of the standard curve. Due to the exploratory nature of this study, the authors have decided not to adjust for multiplicity to limit the risk for type II errors, which must be considered when interpretating the results.

Strengths of the present study include its prospective design, effective intervention method, structured regime of follow-up, low attrition rate and excellent adherence to the dietary treatment leading to a substantial weight loss. Another important strength is the generalizability of the study, including a wide range of every-day care PsA patients. To minimize impact of treatment change on the biomarkers, cs/bDMARDs were held unchanged from three months prior to BL until M6. Blood samples were collected fasting, and early in the morning in account for the circadian rhythm. BL and M6 samples from each participant were run together in the same plate to limit analytical variation. Patients were examined by the same physician for a consistent estimation of joint activity.

Conclusions

A structured weight loss treatment in patients with PsA and obesity was accompanied by significant changes in several biomarkers associated with inflammation, bone and cartilage metabolism. Serum levels of HGF, VEGF, BAFF and COMP had a particular significant decrease in response to the weight loss, while CTX-1 was significantly increased. In the PsA patients, ∆CTX-1 correlated with ∆BMI and ∆swollen joint 66 count and ∆DAS28CRP. Similar changes in the biomarkers were observed in the control group, and a comparative analysis displayed no difference between the PsA patient and control group. Hence, the results of this sub-study suggest that the beneficial effect of weight loss treatment through VLED on PsA disease activity parameters in the previous report [11], might be related to factors associated with obesity, rather than with the PsA disease per se.

This study supports the hypothesis of obesity as a promotor of inflammation, cartilage and bone remodeling, with association to parameters of disease activity in PsA. The results also bring attention to the need to consider adjusting for BMI in the evaluation of serological biomarkers.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (20.4KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the patients and controls who participated in the study. We also wish to thank Anneli Lund and Marie-Louise Andersson at the Clinical Rheumatology Research Center at Sahlgrenska University hospital and the personnel at the Obesity Unit at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.

Abbreviations

AS

Ankylosing Spondylitis

axSpA

Axial Spondyloarthritis

BAFF

B-cell Activating Factor

BL

Baseline

BMC

Bone Mineral Content

BMD

Bone Mineral Density

BMI

Body Mass Index

Breg

Regulatory B Cell

BSA

Body Surface Area

CASPAR

Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis

COMP

Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein

CRP

C-Reactive Protein

CTX-1

Carboxy-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type 1 collagen

cs/b DMARD

Conventional synthetic/biologic Disease Modifying Anti- Rheumatic Drug

DAS28CRP

Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts based on CRP

DAPSA

Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis

Dkk-1

Dickkopf-1

HAQ

Health Assessment Questionnaire

ELISA

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

HGF

Hepatocyte Growth Factor

IL-10

Interleukin-10

M6

Month 6

MDA

Minimal Disease Activity

MMP

Matrix Metalloproteinase

NSAID

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug

OPG

Osteoprotegerin

PsA

Psoriatic Arthritis

PsO

Psoriasis

rs

Spearman´s correlation

RA

Rheumatoid Arthritis

RANKL

Soluble Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kB Ligand

SOST

Sclerostin

SJC

Swollen Joint Count

Th

T helper Cells

TJC

Tender Joint Count

TNFi

Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitor

OPG

Osteoprotegerin

VAS

Visual Analogue Scale

VEGF

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

VLED

Very Low Energy Diet

Author contributions

LT participated in interpretation of data and was responsible for statistical analyses and drafting of the article. CJ was responsible for the serum analyses of biomarkers and participated in interpretation of the data and drafting of the article. BE participated in the study design, recruitment and examination of patients, collection and interpretation of data and was responsible for the weight loss treatment and follow-up. HFdE participated in the study design, analysis and interpretation of data.AJL participated in interpretation of data and drafting of the article. AB participated in the study design, recruitment and examination of patients, collection, analysis and interpretation of data. IG participated in the study design, interpretation of data and drafting of the article. IL participated in the study design, recruitment and examination of patients, collection and interpretation of data and was responsible for the weight loss treatment and follow-up. EK was responsible for the study design, recruitment of patients, rheumatologic evaluations, data collection, interpretation of data and participated in drafting of the article. All authors have critically reviewed the manuscript, approved the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Gothenburg.

This work was supported by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish Government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-825511), the Health and Medical Care Executive Board of the Västra Götaland, the Gothenburg Society of Medicine (22/973585), Inger Bendix foundation for medical research, Rune and Ulla Amlövs foundation for Rheumatology Research, Stiftelsen Psoriasisfonden and the Swedish Rheumatology Association research grant in collaboration with Roche. The sponsors of the study had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in Gothenburg (approval number 901 − 15) and carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02917434, registered on September 21, 2016, retrospectively registered. All participants gave their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable in the absence of any individual person´s data in any form.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Gladman DD, Antoni C, Mease P, Clegg DO, Nash P. Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii14–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mc Ardle A, Flatley B, Pennington SR, FitzGerald O. Early biomarkers of joint damage in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Husni ME. Comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015;41(4):677–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumthekar A, Ogdie A. Obesity and psoriatic arthritis: A narrative review. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7(3):447–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klingberg E, Bjorkman S, Eliasson B, Larsson I, Bilberg A. Weight loss is associated with sustained improvement of disease activity and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity: a prospective intervention study with two years of follow-up. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anandarajah AP, Schwarz EM, Totterman S, Monu J, Feng CY, Shao T, et al. The effect of etanercept on osteoclast precursor frequency and enhancing bone marrow oedema in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(3):296–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hachiya R, Tanaka M, Itoh M, Suganami T. Molecular mechanism of crosstalk between immune and metabolic systems in metabolic syndrome. Inflamm Regen. 2022;42(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cao JJ. Effects of obesity on bone metabolism. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Paine A, Ritchlin C. Altered bone remodeling in psoriatic disease: new insights and future directions. Calcif Tissue Int. 2018;102(5):559–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ryan C, Korman NJ, Gelfand JM, Lim HW, Elmets CA, Feldman SR, et al. Research gaps in psoriasis: opportunities for future studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(1):146–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Klingberg E, Bilberg A, Bjorkman S, Hedberg M, Jacobsson L, Forsblad-d’Elia H, et al. Weight loss improves disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity: an interventional study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2665–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Healy PJ, Helliwell PS. Measuring clinical enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: assessment of existing measures and development of an instrument specific to psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(5):686–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23(2):137–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Prevoo ML, van ‘t Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(1):44–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schoels M, Aletaha D, Funovits J, Kavanaugh A, Baker D, Smolen JS. Application of the DAREA/DAPSA score for assessment of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(8):1441–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(1):48–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Molnarfi N, Benkhoucha M, Funakoshi H, Nakamura T, Lalive PH. Hepatocyte growth factor: A regulator of inflammation and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14(4):293–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Melincovici CS, Bosca AB, Susman S, Marginean M, Mihu C, Istrate M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) - key factor in normal and pathological angiogenesis. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2018;59(2):455–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nagase H, Woessner JF. Jr. Matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(31):21491–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ng LG, Sutherland AP, Newton R, Qian F, Cachero TG, Scott ML, et al. B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF family (BAFF)-R is the principal BAFF receptor facilitating BAFF costimulation of Circulating T and B cells. J Immunol. 2004;173(2):807–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Odink K, Cerletti N, Bruggen J, Clerc RG, Tarcsay L, Zwadlo G, et al. Two calcium-binding proteins in infiltrate macrophages of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 1987;330(6143):80–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nowicki JK, Jakubowska-Pietkiewicz E, Osteocalcin. Beyond Bones Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2024;39(3):399–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ono T, Hayashi M, Sasaki F, Nakashima T. RANKL biology: bone metabolism, the immune system, and beyond. Inflamm Regen. 2020;40:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jadon DR, Nightingale AL, McHugh NJ, Lindsay MA, Korendowych E, Sengupta R. Serum soluble bone turnover biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis and psoriatic spondyloarthropathy. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(1):21–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Omran A, Atanasova D, Landgren F, Magnusson P. Sclerostin: from molecule to clinical biomarker. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27.Muller G, Michel A, Altenburg E. COMP (cartilage oligomeric matrix protein) is synthesized in ligament, tendon, meniscus, and articular cartilage. Connect Tissue Res. 1998;39(4):233–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garnero P, Delmas PD. Biochemical markers of bone turnover. Applications for osteoporosis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998;27(2):303–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kontny E, Prochorec-Sobieszek M. Articular adipose tissue resident macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis patients: potential contribution to local abnormalities. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(12):2158–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Grandaunet B, Syversen SW, Hoff M, Sundan A, Haugeberg G, van Der Heijde D, et al. Association between high plasma levels of hepatocyte growth factor and progression of radiographic damage in the joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(3):662–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bell LN, Ward JL, Degawa-Yamauchi M, Bovenkerk JE, Jones R, Cacucci BM, et al. Adipose tissue production of hepatocyte growth factor contributes to elevated serum HGF in obesity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006;291(4):E843–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ramonda R, Modesti V, Ortolan A, Scanu A, Bassi N, Oliviero F, et al. Serological markers in psoriatic arthritis: promising tools. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2013;238(12):1431–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Silha JV, Krsek M, Sucharda P, Murphy LJ. Angiogenic factors are elevated in overweight and obese individuals. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005;29(11):1308–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mattey DL, Packham JC, Nixon NB, Coates L, Creamer P, Hailwood S, et al. Association of cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase profiles with disease activity and function in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(3):R127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liberale L, Bonaventura A, Carbone F, Bertolotto M, Contini P, Scopinaro N, et al. Early reduction of matrix metalloproteinase-8 serum levels is associated with leptin drop and predicts diabetes remission after bariatric surgery. Int J Cardiol. 2017;245:257–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mavropoulos A, Varna A, Zafiriou E, Liaskos C, Alexiou I, Roussaki-Schulze A, et al. IL-10 producing Bregs are impaired in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis and inversely correlate with IL-17- and IFNgamma-producing T cells. Clin Immunol. 2017;184:33–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Conigliaro P, Triggianese P, Perricone C, Chimenti MS, Di Muzio G, Ballanti E, et al. Restoration of peripheral blood natural killer and B cell levels in patients affected by rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis during etanercept treatment. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;177(1):234–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim YH, Choi BH, Cheon HG, Do MS. B cell activation factor (BAFF) is a novel adipokine that links obesity and inflammation. Exp Mol Med. 2009;41(3):208–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jarlborg M, Courvoisier DS, Lamacchia C, Martinez Prat L, Mahler M, Bentow C, et al. Serum calprotectin: a promising biomarker in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sakellariou G, Lombardi G, Vitolo B, Gomarasca M, Faraldi M, Caporali R, et al. Serum calprotectin as a marker of ultrasound-detected synovitis in early psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis: results from a cross-sectional retrospective study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019;37(3):429–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Muschitz C, Kocijan R, Marterer C, Nia AR, Muschitz GK, Resch H, et al. Sclerostin levels and changes in bone metabolism after bariatric surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(3):891–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Appel H, Ruiz-Heiland G, Listing J, Zwerina J, Herrmann M, Mueller R, et al. Altered skeletal expression of sclerostin and its link to radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(11):3257–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dalbeth N, Pool B, Smith T, Callon KE, Lobo M, Taylor WJ, et al. Circulating mediators of bone remodeling in psoriatic arthritis: implications for disordered osteoclastogenesis and bone erosion. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(4):R164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chung Y, Li ZC, Sun XL, Liu YY, Shao M, Gan YZ, et al. Elevated serum Dickkopf-1 is a biomarker for bone erosion in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021;134(21):2583–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Prestwich TC, Macdougald OA. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in adipogenesis and metabolism. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19(6):612–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Christodoulides C, Laudes M, Cawthorn WP, Schinner S, Soos M, O’Rahilly S, et al. The Wnt antagonist Dickkopf-1 and its receptors are coordinately regulated during early human adipogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 12):2613–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Skoumal M, Haberhauer G, Fink A, Steiner A, Klingler A, Varga F, et al. Increased serum levels of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein in patients with psoriasis vulgaris: a marker for unknown peripheral joint involvement? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26(6):1087–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chandran V, Cook RJ, Edwin J, Shen H, Pellett FJ, Shanmugarajah S, et al. Soluble biomarkers differentiate patients with psoriatic arthritis from those with psoriasis without arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(7):1399–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mundermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP, King KB. Serum concentration of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) is sensitive to physiological Cyclic loading in healthy adults. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13(1):34–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Grisar J, Bernecker PM, Aringer M, Redlich K, Sedlak M, Wolozcszuk W, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and reactive arthritis show increased bone resorption, but differ with regard to bone formation. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(7):1430–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (20.4KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Rheumatology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES