Abstract
Background:
Among females, Cervical cancer affects more frequently than any other type of cancer in Indonesia. Cervical cancer and illnesses linked to HPV infection are potentially preventable through vaccination. The aim of his study was to describe the characteristics of the available vaccines, the policy, and the implementation of HPV vaccination in Indonesia.
Methods:
A scoping review was performed by collecting information from previous studies, including general information about vaccines, vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, and safety.
Results:
Approved HPV vaccine products in Indonesia have proven efficacy, effectiveness, and safety. Procuring vaccines through GAVI/UNICEF and the government has both advantages and disadvantages. Alongside the limited supply, numerous research studies show that dosage reduction to a single dose provides equal protection compared to 2-3 doses. The benchmark implementation of the single dose has been done in many countries, ranging from high-income to low-middle-income countries. Therefore, considering other countries and Indonesia’s high population and vaccination burden, proposed updates for vaccination programs are recommended to achieve the cancer elimination target by 2030.
Conclusion:
Improvement of vaccination programs using single-dose HPV vaccine to prevent cervical cancer requires a coherent framework, sufficient funds, effective management of stakeholder interests, and sensitivity to contextual factors.
Key Words: Cervical cancer, cost, HPV Vaccine, policy, single dose
Introduction
Among females, cervical cancer affects more than any other type of cancer in the world. The incidence of cervical cancer was 604,127 (6.5%) and it becomes the fourth highest among new cancer cases in 2020 [1] and half of it occurred in Asia with 351,720 (7.8%) cases [2]. In Indonesia, there were 36,633 (17.2%) of cervical cases and it becomes top two of cancer cases among females [3]. The burden of the disease increased beginning at age of 25 and peaked at age 95 or beyond for women who have cervical cancer [4].
Factors hypothesized to enhance the risk of cervical cancer are smoking, prolonged oral contraceptive usage, high numbers of parity, and persistent infection with oncogenic human papilloma virus (HPV) types. There are 13 high-risk HV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68) and 5 moderately high-risk HPV types (53, 66, 70, 73 MM9, and 82 MM4) [5]. HPV types 16 and 18, which are mostly associated with carcinogenesis, are the most prevalent types on a global scale [5]. They have been linked to almost 70% of cervical cancer incidences worldwide [6]. Nonetheless, apart from the high prevalence of cervical cancer cases caused by HPV, the disease is actually preventable.
Cervical cancer and other illnesses linked to HPV infection are preventable [7]. There are three HPV vaccines approved by the Indonesian Food and Drug Administration (Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan / BPOM): the bivalent vaccine (2vHPV), the quadrivalent vaccine (4vHPV), and the nine-valent vaccine (9vHPV). In terms of HPV infection, the 4vHPV vaccine provides protection against infection from HPV types 6 and 11, which are thought to be responsible for 90% of genital warts and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. The 4vHPV and 2vHPV vaccines also provide protection against types 16 and 18, which are thought to be responsible for approximately 66% of cervical cancers [8]. On the other hand, the 9vHPV vaccine protects against types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58; hence preventing approximately 81% of cervical cancers [9].
HPV Vaccine has been introduced as national immunization programs by 60% of World Health Organization (WHO) member states. However, only 13% of female adolescents on the global scale received HPV vaccination. In addition, as of 2019, only 19% of low- to middle-income nations had implemented HPV vaccination, compared to 77% of countries in Europe and 85% of countries in the Americas [10]. One of the reasons for this gap is that many LMIC either do not have national HPV vaccination programs or, if they do, they have significant obstacles, such as huge amounts of the required budget. Therefore, in response to this case, financial planning and implementation of an effective and efficient HPV immunization program are crucial.
In 2022, the WHO has revised its recommendations for the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in a new position paper. Particularly, the paper claims that a single-dose schedule can offer protection that is just as effective and long-lasting as a two-dose regimen. The position paper occurs at a correct moment considering the critically alarming global decrease in HPV vaccination rates. The coverage of the first HPV vaccine dose decreased from 15% to 25% between 2019 and 2021. As a result, 3.5 million more girls in 2021 than in 2019 did not receive complete dose of HPV vaccination [11]. Alongside the benchmark implementation of a single-dose in many countries, whereas yet to be implemented in Indonesia, therefore the study of product, schedule, and options of procurement in Indonesia related to a single-dose HPV need to be observed. This paper studied the existing evidence on product, schedule, and procurement options for HPV vaccination strategy for HPV; scale-up costs with options of each HPV type/product and procurement methods; and a proposed update to HPV technical guidelines and/or HPV national roadmap plan according to the current recommendation on single dose.
Materials and Methods
To provide comprehensive information on the effectiveness of currently available vaccine in the Indonesian market, a scoping review was performed by collecting information from previous studies including general information on the vaccines, vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, and safety. The latest recommendation on HPV vaccination was collected from WHO and SAGE publications. Formal information from the Ministry of Health (MoH), the department of health and also primary health care in Indonesia, including the vaccine procurement process and policy, vaccine local price, and target population for HPV vaccination policy were collected through interview and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The current implementation of the nationwide HPV vaccination policy was obtained from the technical guideline from MoH and the official report on its application in 2023. The benchmark implementations of single dose policy in other countries were also collected from the respective official websites. This study also included calculations regarding the scale-up cost for 1 dose and 2 doses of the Nationwide HPV Vaccination Program.
Results
General Information among Currently Available HPV Vaccines in Indonesia
There are three different HPV vaccine which are available in Indonesia. All of the HPV vaccine products have been approved by the Indonesian Food & Drug Administration of (BPOM) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Product Details of HPV Vaccines
| Vaccine Characteristics |
Product Types | Source | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervarix (2vHPV) | Gardasil (4vHPV) | Gardasil 9 (9vHPV) | ||
| Target of HPV strains | HPV-16 and HPV-18 | HPV-6, 11, 16, and 18 | HPV-6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 | [12] |
| Disease Protection | HPV-Related Cancers | HPV-Related Cancers and Genital Warts | HPV-Related Cancers and Genital Warts | [12] |
| Adjuvant | A composed of monophosphoryl-lipid A, adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide (AS04) | amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate | amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate | [13,14] |
| Administration Method | Intramuscular injection | Intramuscular injection | Intramuscular injection | [12] |
| Manufacturer | Glaxo-Smith Kline Biologicals (GSK) | Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) | Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) | [12, 14] |
HPV Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2021), clinical trials limited to people without signs of infection with the vaccine types at the time of vaccination revealed that all HPV vaccines had high efficacy (nearly 100%) for preventing HPV vaccine type-related persistent infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3, and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) [15]. Furthermore, females who receive the vaccine prior to HPV exposure in nations with high vaccine uptake, the effect of HPV immunization in real life circumstances is clear. Maximum reductions have been reported to be approximately 90% for HPV 6/11/16/18 infections, 90% for genital warts, 45% for low-grade cytological cervical abnormalities, and 85% for high-grade histologically confirmed cervical abnormalities [12].
In Indonesia, according to its country specific HPV infection incidence, the weighted efficacy ranged from 83% to 96.1% (Table 2). The quadrivalent HPV vaccines are considerably effective since it has 95% efficacy against HPV 16 and 18 infections [16]. Meanwhile, for the bivalent vaccine was 100% effective against CIN 2+ linked with HPV-16/18 and 100% effective against 12-month persistent infection (95% CI = 81.8-100). It was 93.3% effective against the incidence of HPV-16/18 infection (95% CI = 87.4-98.7). The effectiveness against lesions that were unrelated to the type of HPV DNA was 71.9% (95% CI = 20.6-91.9). The study also discovered that the concentration of anti-HPV-16 and anti-HPV-18 antibodies remained 12-fold or higher than that attained after natural infection [14].
Table 2.
The Comparison of HPV Vaccine Efficacy for Indonesian Population
| HPV types | Prevalence of Infection (%) | Vaccine efficacy (%) (b) | Source | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | Bivalent | Quadrivalent | Nonavalent | ||
| 16 | 47 | 95 | 95 | 95 | [17,18] |
| 18 | 20 | 95 | 95 | 95 | [17, 18, 19] |
| 31 | 0 | 79 | 0 | 95 | [17, 18, 19] |
| 33 | 30 | 56 | 0 | 95 | [17, 18, 19] |
| 45 | 6 | 76 | 0 | 95 | [17, 18, 19] |
| 52 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 95 | [18] |
| 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | [18] |
| Vaccine efficacy (axb) | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.94 | [20] | |
Alongside the two types of vaccine above, according to epidemiology studies, Gardasil 9 is expected to provide protection against the HPV types that are thought to be responsible for approximately 90% of cervical cancers, more than 95% of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 75-85% of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3), and 85-90% of HPV-related vulvar cancers [16].
Regarding cross-protection of HPV vaccines. A study in Japan exploring the cross protection of bivalent vaccine among Japanese women between 20 and 22 years old. Out of 1814 among 2197 women who were tested were also included in the analysis. A total of 1355 (74.6%) of them received the vaccination, and 1295 (95.5%) finished the three-dose course. The pooled Vaccine Effectiveness (VEs) on HPV 16 and 18 was 95.5% (P=0.01) and on HPV 31, 45, and 52 was 71.9% (P = 0.01). After adjusting for the number of sexual partners and birth year, the pooled VEs for HPV 16 and 18 was 93.9% (P = 0.01) and for HPV 31, 45, and 52 was 67.7% (P = 0.01). Against HPV16 and 18, the bivalent HPV vaccine has excellent protection. Significant cross-protection against HPV31, 45, and 52 was additionally shown and maintained up to 6 years following vaccination [21]. Alongside the effectiveness of vaccination in general, particularly for women, the effectiveness of HPV vaccination was also studied for catch-ups, boosters, and males.
Effectiveness of Catch-Up Vaccination
Catch-up vaccination describes the action of vaccinating individuals who do not have or have not received the required number of doses of a vaccine at the recommended age. If a person was not vaccinated against HPV when they were young, they could still get the benefit if they are vaccinated until the age of 26 (Table 3) [12]. Although the HPV vaccine has been approved for use in adults up to the age of 45, catch-up vaccination is better administered at 13-26 years old and not commonly advised for anyone older than 26 because the vaccine’s benefits begin to decrease following HPV exposure [12].
Table 3.
The Cost Component of HPV Vaccination
| Cost Component | GAVI/UNICEF* (USD) | Government contract price* (USD) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vaccine price | 4.5 | 11.62 | [27] |
| Shipping price | 0.16 | 0 | [27] |
| Handling fee | 0.41 | [27] | |
| Insurance | 0.23 | [27] |
*Vaccine price using Gardasil price for the budget impact analysis
There are, however, numerous studies on the effectiveness of vaccines in adult women. The effectiveness of the bivalent HPV vaccine against preventing persistent HPV 16/18 infection in adults >26 years old and previously uninfected women was 83% (95% CI = 71% to 90%) and 43% (95% CI = 31% to 53%), respectively. In naive infection, the vaccine’s effectiveness against CIN2+ linked to HPV 16/18 was 70% (95% CI = 19% to 89%)12. The effectiveness of the cross-protective vaccine against HPV 31 infection was 79.1% (97.7% CI = 27.6% to 95.9%) and against HPV 45 infection was 76.9% (95% CI = 18.5% to 95.6%). The quadrivalent vaccine had an efficacy of 88.7% (95% CI = 78.1% to 94.8%) against CIN and external genital lesions related to HPV 6/11/16/18 in naive HPV infection at baseline compared to an efficacy of 30.9% (95% CI = 11.1% to 46.5%) in the placebo group against CIN2+ associated with HPV 6/11/16/182/3 [12].
In England, a catch-up bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination on cervical screening outcomes was also studied. As part of the English HPV screening pilot between 2013 and 2018, 108,138 women between the ages of 24 and 25 (offered vaccination) and 26 and 29 (not offered vaccination) were screened [22]. With an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 87% (95% CI: 82-91%), it demonstrates that at 24–25 years of age, the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) associated with HPV16/18 dropped from 3 to 1% (p 0.001). With an estimated vaccination efficiency of 72% (95% CI: 66-77%), the detection of any CIN2+ decreased from 6 to 3% (p 0.001)22. These results demonstrate the excellent efficacy of the bivalent HPV vaccination given in England via a population-based catch-up effort.
Effectiveness of Booster Vaccination
Booster vaccination refers to an additional dosage or doses of a vaccination administered where protection from initial shot(s) has started to decline over time. Research on the effectiveness of booster dose was previously conducted to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the booster dose of Gardasil (qHPV) or Cervarix (bHPV) given to 12–13-year-old females who received 2 doses of qHPV (0–6 months) at the age of 9–10 years old. HPV booster vaccinations were given to 366 out of 416 eligible females. Approximately 99–100% of the females showed detectable antibodies to 4 HPV genotypes included in the qHPV three years after receiving their first vaccination [23]. A total of 88–98% of individuals showed a 4-fold rise in antibody titers to the genotypes covered by the vaccination after receiving a booster dose of qHPV [23]. A 4-fold increase in antibody titers to HPV16 and HPV18 was observed in 93-99% of individuals following a booster of bHPV. Both vaccines safety profiles were satisfactory. When administered as a booster to females who have already received two doses of the qHPV vaccine, both qHPV and bHPV raise antibody titers [23].
Initially, the HPV vaccine was authorized for girls aged 9 to 26. However, according to the CDC [15], immunogenicity examinations showed that two HPV vaccination doses given to 9–14-year-olds at least six months apart from one another offered an equal amount of protection to three doses given to older adolescents or young adults. This may indicate the effective age for booster vaccination.
Effectiveness of HPV Vaccination in Males
In the US, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) upgraded its recommendation in October 2011 by advising routine HPV vaccination for boys aged 11 to 12 and catch-up immunization for males aged 13 to 21 [24]. Male vaccination is particularly encouraged because the HPV types 16 and 18 are responsible for 92% of cases of anal cancer, 63% of cases of penile cancer, and 89% of cases of oral or oropharyngeal cancer [25].
The vaccine efficacy against the incidence of HPV 16 and HPV 18 infection was 28.0–45.1% and 33.9–49.5%, respectively [26]. According to reports, vaccines were successful against anal condyloma between 57.2 and 67.2% [26]. Infection with HPV-6, 11, 16, and 18 as well as the emergence of associated external genital lesions are prevented in males between the ages of 16 and 26 by the quadrivalent HPV vaccine26. Vaccination is moderately successful for individuals against genital HPV infection and high-grade anal intraepithelial lesions in people, regardless of their HPV status [12].
HPV Vaccine Safety
Safety in the use of vaccines is crucial and carefully considered. A study showed that overall adverse effects at the injection site of bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines result in 1.18 relative risk and 1.16 to 1.20 95% CI [12]. Recent studies have looked specifically at outcomes such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), Bell’s palsy, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), premature ovarian insufficiency, primary ovarian failure, and venous thromboembolism, but they have not found any new evidence linking the HPV vaccine to those conditions. Although there is no evidence linking the HPV vaccine to worse pregnancy outcomes, it is still not advised during pregnancy [12].
Procurement Options
There are two current options for procuring HPV vaccines in Indonesia. First, vaccines can be purchased by the government from MSD and the products are repackaged by Biofarma. For the second option, the vaccines can be bought through UNICEF with the price standardized by GAVI. Through GAVI, bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonavalent vaccine costs were US$4.6, US$4.5, and US$6.9, respectively (Table 3). In addition, Indonesia currently has a contract price of US$11.79 for the quadrivalent vaccine if the government purchases it from the pharmaceutical industry [27].
The Scale-Up Cost of the Nationwide HPV Vaccination Policy in Indonesia
Based on the Indonesia Cervical Cancer Profile [11], the total population of Indonesian females in 2019 was 134,400,000, with a total female mortality of cervical cancer deaths (2019) of 19,300 and a cancer mortality-to-incidence ratio (2020) of 0.57 [34]. In response to these statistics and WHO recommendations related to HPV vaccination programs, Indonesia has been initiating HPV vaccination programs for female children aged 11-12 years old since 2016, starting with coverage of 75,124 female students in Jakarta. The latest implementation was conducting HPV vaccination in 9 provinces, including Jakarta, Central Java, Yogyakarta, East Java, Bali, North Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi, and Gorontalo, with total coverage of 5th grade and 6th grade female students of 740,767 and 208,129, respectively (Table 5). With the plan of nationwide vaccination programs in 34 provinces (Table 5), the government strategy for scaling up costs related to HPV products and procurement methods is critical.
Table 4.
The Cost of New Vaccine Introduction (NVI) for HPV Vaccine in Indonesia
| Year | Total Budget of Vaccine Provision (IDR) | Total Budget of HPV Vaccine Provision (IDR) | Percentage of HPV Vaccine |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2,597,669,856,000.00 | 151,101,665,000.00 | 5.90% |
| 2023 | 2,414,641,213,000.00 | 547,723,068,750.00 | 23% |
Source: personal discussion with Indonesian Ministry of Health
Table 5.
HPV Vaccination Coverage in BIAS 2020-2022 and Population Data of Female Children of Health Development Program Targets 2021-2025
| No. | Province | HPV Vaccination Coverage through BIAS | Targeted Female Children for HPV Vaccination | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||||
| Gr.5/11 y.o | Gr.6/y.o | Gr.5/11 y.o | Gr.6/12 y.o | Gr.5/11 y.o | Gr.6/12 y.o | Gr.5/11 y.o | Gr.6/12 y.o | Gr.5/11 y.o | Gr.6/12 y.o | Gr.5/11 y.o | Gr.6/12 y.o | ||
| 1 | Aceh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49,924 | 49,827 | 50,006 | 49,919 | 49,928 | 49,848 |
| 2 | North Sumatera | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 135,234 | 135,350 | 135,070 | 135,273 | 134,467 | 134,697 |
| 3 | West Sumatera | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51,150 | 50,854 | 51,480 | 51,227 | 51,797 | 51,634 |
| 4 | Riau | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69,213 | 69,910 | 68,182 | 68,904 | 66,056 | 66,663 |
| 5 | Jambi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29,587 | 29,518 | 29,588 | 29,510 | 29,550 | 29,461 |
| 6 | South Sumatera | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74,796 | 74,058 | 75,152 | 74,330 | 75,756 | 74,984 |
| 7 | Bengkulu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16,287 | 16,234 | 16,314 | 16,246 | 16,305 | 16,222 |
| 8 | Lampung | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70,543 | 70,632 | 70,358 | 70,472 | 69,978 | 70,091 |
| 9 | Kep. Bangka Belitung | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,119 | 12,069 | 12,203 | 12,161 | 12,279 | 12,250 |
| 10 | Kepulauan Riau | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19,479 | 19,160 | 19,606 | 19,184 | 19,927 | 19,462 |
| 11 | DKI Jakarta | 75,124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73,266 | 68,694 | 73,089 | 71,836 | 74,595 | 73,247 | 75,562 | 74,069 |
| 12 | West Java | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 394,608 | 397,125 | 392,407 | 394,585 | 389,623 | 391,163 |
| 13 | Central Java | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 277,325 | 12,977 | 258,088 | 261,167 | 255,150 | 258,161 | 251,405 | 254,122 |
| 14 | D.I. Yogyakarta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25,889 | 25,536 | 25,258 | 25,016 | 25,626 | 25,318 | 26,091 | 25,734 |
| 15 | East Java | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 271,059 | 35,227 | 264,178 | 263,336 | 262,359 | 260,482 | 263,897 | 261,869 |
| 16 | Banten | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108,686 | 108,564 | 108,807 | 108,671 | 108,597 | 108,397 |
| 17 | Bali | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34,107 | 24,350 | 31,613 | 31,966 | 30,913 | 31,100 | 30,281 | 30,288 |
| 18 | West Nusa Tenggara | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46,401 | 45,852 | 46,784 | 46,252 | 47,217 | 46,733 |
| 19 | East Nusa Tenggara | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52,750 | 52,036 | 53,426 | 52,664 | 53,955 | 53,139 |
| 20 | West Kalimantan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43,202 | 43,143 | 43,133 | 43,040 | 43,004 | 42,873 |
| 21 | Central Kalimantan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22,076 | 22,022 | 22,094 | 22,028 | 22,059 | 21,978 |
| 22 | South Kalimantan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37,602 | 37,305 | 38,020 | 37,872 | 38,269 | 38,276 |
| 23 | East Kalimantan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28,984 | 28,878 | 29,016 | 28,895 | 29,009 | 28,866 |
| 24 | North Kalimantan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,208 | 6,206 | 6,253 | 6,260 | 6,271 | 6,283 |
| 25 | North Sulawesi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16,706 | 3,292 | 19,038 | 18,956 | 19,128 | 19,071 | 19,252 | 19,242 |
| 26 | Central Sulawesi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27,073 | 26,870 | 27,339 | 27,165 | 27,524 | 27,380 |
| 27 | South Sulawesi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,736 | 11,302 | 71,751 | 71,886 | 71,625 | 71,822 | 71,332 | 71,595 |
| 28 | Southeast Sulawesi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23,601 | 26,751 | 24,845 | 24,762 | 24,866 | 24,719 | 24,976 | 24,778 |
| 29 | Gorontalo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7,078 | 0 | 9,732 | 9,751 | 9,710 | 9,736 | 9,651 | 9,679 |
| 30 | West Sulawesi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,793 | 12,728 | 12,833 | 12,775 | 12,843 | 12,785 |
| 31 | Maluku | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16,389 | 16,378 | 16,373 | 16,358 | 16,304 | 16,273 |
| 32 | North Maluku | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,498 | 11,499 | 11,506 | 11,510 | 11,460 | 11,463 |
| 33 | West Papua | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9,024 | 9,002 | 9,073 | 9,050 | 9,116 | 9,078 |
| 34 | Papua | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30,253 | 30,083 | 30,371 | 30,212 | 30,447 | 30,299 |
| Indonesia | 75,124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 740,767 | 208,129 | 2,153,471 | 2,153,979 | 2,149,366 | 2,148,219 | 2,144,188 | 2,141,674 | |
The annual cost scheme of 2-dose HPV vaccines for grade 5 and 6 female students or those aged 11-12 years old in 34 provinces is shown in Table 6. It costs IDR 522,777,527,226.00; 776,259,885,795.00; and 774,142,395,474.00 for the respective years of 2023, 2024, and 2025. A comparison to the annual cost scheme of the 1-dose HPV vaccine for grade 5 or 11 years old is presented in Table 7. This vaccination in 2023-2025 costs IDR 388,975,006,317.00; 388,233,532,482.00; and 387,298,245,876.00. This will result in 29% lower cost of New Vaccine Introduction (NVI) compared to total budget of HPV vaccine provision, which is 547,723,068750.00, in 2023 by Indonesian Ministry of Health (Table 4). These calculations are based on the price of Gardasil, as there is no other brand and prices available on the Indonesian government website. To conclude, 1-dose HPV vaccination costs half as much than 2-doses. This surely can result in wider coverage with less budget.
Table 6.
Annual Cost Scheme for 2 Doses of HPV Vaccination Program
| No. | Province | Targeted Female Children | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |||||
| Dose 2 | Dose 1 | Dose 2 | Dose 1 | Dose 2 | Dose 1 | ||
| 1 | Aceh | 0 | 49,924 | 49,919 | 50,006 | 49,848 | 49,928 |
| 2 | North Sumatera | 0 | 135,234 | 135,273 | 135,070 | 134,697 | 134,467 |
| 3 | West Sumatera | 0 | 51,150 | 51,227 | 51,480 | 51,634 | 51,797 |
| 4 | Riau | 0 | 69,213 | 68,904 | 68,182 | 66,663 | 66,056 |
| 5 | Jambi | 0 | 29,587 | 29,510 | 29,588 | 29,461 | 29,550 |
| 6 | South Sumatera | 0 | 74,796 | 74,330 | 75,152 | 74,984 | 75,756 |
| 7 | Bengkulu | 0 | 16,287 | 16,246 | 16,314 | 16,222 | 16,305 |
| 8 | Lampung | 0 | 70,543 | 70,472 | 70,358 | 70,091 | 69,978 |
| 9 | Kep. Bangka Belitung | 0 | 12,119 | 12,161 | 12,203 | 12,250 | 12,279 |
| 10 | Kepulauan Riau | 0 | 19,479 | 19,184 | 19,606 | 19,462 | 19,927 |
| 11 | DKI Jakarta | 73,266 | 73,089 | 73,247 | 74,595 | 74,069 | 75,562 |
| 12 | West Java | 0 | 394,608 | 394,585 | 392,407 | 391,163 | 389,623 |
| 13 | Central Java | 277,325 | 258,088 | 258,161 | 255,150 | 254,122 | 251,405 |
| 14 | D.I. Yogyakarta | 25,889 | 25,258 | 25,318 | 25,626 | 25,734 | 26,091 |
| 15 | East Java | 271,059 | 264,178 | 260,482 | 262,359 | 261,869 | 263,897 |
| 16 | Banten | 0 | 108,686 | 108,671 | 108,807 | 108,397 | 108,597 |
| 17 | Bali | 34,107 | 31,613 | 31,100 | 30,913 | 30,288 | 30,281 |
| 18 | West Nusa Tenggara | 0 | 46,401 | 46,252 | 46,784 | 46,733 | 47,217 |
| 19 | East Nusa Tenggara | 0 | 52,750 | 52,664 | 53,426 | 53,139 | 53,955 |
| 20 | West Kalimantan | 0 | 43,202 | 43,040 | 43,133 | 42,873 | 43,004 |
| 21 | Central Kalimantan | 0 | 22,076 | 22,028 | 22,094 | 21,978 | 22,059 |
| 22 | South Kalimantan | 0 | 37,602 | 37,872 | 38,020 | 38,276 | 38,269 |
| 23 | East Kalimantan | 0 | 28,984 | 28,895 | 29,016 | 28,866 | 29,009 |
| 24 | North Kalimantan | 0 | 6,208 | 6,260 | 6,253 | 6,283 | 6,271 |
| 25 | North Sulawesi | 16,706 | 19,038 | 19,071 | 19,128 | 19,242 | 19,252 |
| 26 | Central Sulawesi | 0 | 27,073 | 27,165 | 27,339 | 27,380 | 27,524 |
| 27 | South Sulawesi | 11,736 | 71,751 | 71,822 | 71,625 | 71,595 | 71,332 |
| 28 | Southeast Sulawesi | 23,601 | 24,845 | 24,719 | 24,866 | 24,778 | 24,976 |
| 29 | Gorontalo | 7,078 | 9,732 | 9,736 | 9,710 | 9,679 | 9,651 |
| 30 | West Sulawesi | 0 | 12,793 | 12,775 | 12,833 | 12,785 | 12,843 |
| 31 | Maluku | 0 | 16,389 | 16,358 | 16,373 | 16,273 | 16,304 |
| 32 | North Maluku | 0 | 11,498 | 11,510 | 11,506 | 11,463 | 11,460 |
| 33 | West Papua | 0 | 9,024 | 9,050 | 9,073 | 9,078 | 9,116 |
| 34 | Papua | 0 | 30,253 | 30,212 | 30,371 | 30,299 | 30,447 |
| Indonesia | 740,767 | 2,153,471 | 2,148,219 | 2,149,366 | 2,141,674 | 2,144,188 | |
| Gardasil purchasing cost through government (Rp) | 522,777,527,226 | 776,259,885,795 | 774,142,395,474 | ||||
| GAVI/UNICEF Bivalent (Rp) | 234,433,278,000.00 | 348,104,385,000.00 | 347,154,822,000.00 | ||||
| GAVI/UNICEF Quadrivalent (Rp) | 230,091,921,000.00 | 341,658,007,500.00 | 340,726,029,000.00 | ||||
| GAVI/UNICEF Nonavalent (Rp) | 334,284,489,000.00 | 496,371,067,500.00 | 495,017,061,000.00 | ||||
Table 7.
Annual Cost Scheme for 1 Dose of HPV Vaccination Program
| No. | Province | Targeted Female Children (Grade 5 and 11 years old) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | ||
| Dose 1 | Dose 1 | Dose 1 | ||
| 1 | Aceh | 49,924 | 50,006 | 49,928 |
| 2 | North Sumatera | 135,234 | 135,070 | 134,467 |
| 3 | West Sumatera | 51,150 | 51,480 | 51,797 |
| 4 | Riau | 69,213 | 68,182 | 66,056 |
| 5 | Jambi | 29,587 | 29,588 | 29,550 |
| 6 | South Sumatera | 74,796 | 75,152 | 75,756 |
| 7 | Bengkulu | 16,287 | 16,314 | 16,305 |
| 8 | Lampung | 70,543 | 70,358 | 69,978 |
| 9 | Kep. Bangka Belitung | 12,119 | 12,203 | 12,279 |
| 10 | Kepulauan Riau | 19,479 | 19,606 | 19,927 |
| 11 | DKI Jakarta | 73,089 | 74,595 | 75,562 |
| 12 | West Java | 394,608 | 392,407 | 389,623 |
| 13 | Central Java | 258,088 | 255,150 | 251,405 |
| 14 | D.I. Yogyakarta | 25,258 | 25,626 | 26,091 |
| 15 | East Java | 264,178 | 262,359 | 263,897 |
| 16 | Banten | 108,686 | 108,807 | 108,597 |
| 17 | Bali | 31,613 | 30,913 | 30,281 |
| 18 | West Nusa Tenggara | 46,401 | 46,784 | 47,217 |
| 19 | East Nusa Tenggara | 52,750 | 53,426 | 53,955 |
| 20 | West Kalimantan | 43,202 | 43,133 | 43,004 |
| 21 | Central Kalimantan | 22,076 | 22,094 | 22,059 |
| 22 | South Kalimantan | 37,602 | 38,020 | 38,269 |
| 23 | East Kalimantan | 28,984 | 29,016 | 29,009 |
| 24 | North Kalimantan | 6,208 | 6,253 | 6,271 |
| 25 | North Sulawesi | 19,038 | 19,128 | 19,252 |
| 26 | Central Sulawesi | 27,073 | 27,339 | 27,524 |
| 27 | South Sulawesi | 71,751 | 71,625 | 71,332 |
| 28 | Southeast Sulawesi | 24,845 | 24,866 | 24,976 |
| 29 | Gorontalo | 9,732 | 9,710 | 9,651 |
| 30 | West Sulawesi | 12,793 | 12,833 | 12,843 |
| 31 | Maluku | 16,389 | 16,373 | 16,304 |
| 32 | North Maluku | 11,498 | 11,506 | 11,460 |
| 33 | West Papua | 9,024 | 9,073 | 9,116 |
| 34 | Papua | 30,253 | 30,371 | 30,447 |
| Indonesia | 2,153,471 | 2,149,366 | 2,144,188 | |
| Gardasil purchasing cost through government (Rp) | 388,975,006,317.00 | 388,233,532,482.00 | 387,298,245,876.00 | |
| GAVI/UNICEF Bivalent (Rp) | 174,431,151,000.00 | 174,098,646,000.00 | 173,679,228,000.00 | |
| GAVI/UNICEF Quadrivalent (Rp) | 171,200,944,500.00 | 170,874,597,000.00 | 170,462,946,000.00 | |
| GAVI/UNICEF Nonavalent (Rp) | 248,725,900,500.00 | 248,251,773,000.00 | 247,653,714,000.00 | |
Single Dose HPV Vaccine in Indonesia: Future Perspective
The Current evidence on the Efficacy and Effectiveness of single-dose HPV vaccination
According to the WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE), a single dose of HPV vaccination offers equal protection against human papillomavirus (HPV) infections for types 16 and 18, which are responsible for 70% of instances of cervical cancer, as two or three doses with several supporting evidence. As demonstrated in the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (CVT) and Indian International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) studies, a single dose of bivalent or quadrivalent vaccine can last up to 10 to 11 years with stable antibody levels, and is as effective as three doses combined. The Kenya single-dose HPV vaccine efficacy (KEN SHE) also evaluated the efficacy of the 9-valent HPV vaccine in young African women after a single dose of HPV vaccination. It appears that adolescent girls and young women were effectively protected from HPV infection over the first 18 months following vaccination; vaccine efficacy (VE) for the HPV 16/18 vaccine was greater than 97%, consistent with licensure trial results for 3 doses; and VE against the 7 HR HPV types in the 9-valent group was 95% in the preplanned efficacy and sensitivity analyses, excluding participants with HPV DNA at 6 months. Moreover, in the immunobridging of Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study (DoRIS) from Tanzania with the KEN SHE trials study, the one-dose immune response observed in DoRIS was not inferior to KEN SHE at month 18, demonstrating noninferiority to KEN SHE. In the 9-valent group, efficacy was measured 6 months after the first dose and demonstrated a VE of 95% against HPV 16/18 and 95% against the seven high-risk HPV types [15]. Finally, the number of females who can receive this vital, life-saving vaccine might possibly double if nations decide to follow this new suggestion [28].
The Current WHO Recommendation on Cervical Cancer Elimination Strategy
The WHO conveyed the agenda of WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Strategy Targets for 2030 in order to achieve up the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health issue and prevent more deaths [11]. The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Strategy Targets for 2030 are as follows:
a. Ninety percent (90%) of girls are fully vaccinated with the HPV vaccine by the age of 15.
b. Seventy percent (70%) of women are screened with a high-performance test by 35 years of age and again by 45 years of age.
c. Ninety percent (90%) of women identified with cervical disease receive treatment.
HPV schedule optimization is expected to broaden access to the vaccine, giving nations the chance to increase the number of girls who can receive the vaccine and reduce the burden of vaccination follow-up costs. A very important step in reducing avoidable disease and death is to increase access to vaccines that can prevent cervical cancer with an effective schedule and dose, as recommended by the WHO [11].
Schedule
Girls between the ages of 9 and 14 are the main target of immunization, prior to sexual activity. Vaccination of secondary targets, such as boys and older females, is advised where possible and affordable.
Dose
a. A one- or two-dose schedule for girls aged 9 to 14 years old.
b. A one- or two-dose schedule for girls and women aged 15 to 20 years old.
c. Two doses with a 6-month interval for women older than 21 years old.
Regarding this agenda, several countries, namely, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Ireland, have been trying to create and implement their updated guidelines for HPV vaccination programs. This is also supported by various updated studies from research stakeholders, such as the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) and the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), particularly those associated with a single-dose HPV vaccine.
Benchmark Implementation of single dose HPV Vaccination in Some Countries of Several Regions
Europe
United Kingdom
As published in August 2022, JCVI¬ - an independent committee of experts that advises the UK government on issues involving immunization and vaccination- recommended single dose of HPV vaccination [29]. According to the evidence on single-dose vaccine effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness, JCVI’s recommendations aim to maximize the health benefits from immunization. The JCVI advises a single-dose schedule for all teenagers (boys and girls) in year 8 (usually aged 12 and 13) and men who have sex with men (MSM) before the 25th birthday; a 2-dose schedule from the age of 25 in the MSM programme; and a 3-dose schedule for individuals who are immunosuppressed and those known to be HIV-positive. Even though the universal adolescent HPV program will be implemented in schools, eligible students who are homeschooled or educated in other settings should also be provided with the vaccine [29] .
Prior to the announcement, JCVI reviewed a modeling study by Daniels et al. [30] funded by the MSD manufacturer. The modeling showed that at the standard WTP threshold, the probability of single-dose HPV vaccine being cost-effective compared to 2 doses was less than 50% across its sensitivity analysis. In comparison to the 2-doses program, the adoption of a single-dose 9vHPV vaccination program increased the cases of vaccine-preventable HPV-related cancer and disease in both men and women, implied significant uncertainty in the health and economic outcomes, and had a low likelihood of being cost-effective. Moreover, they calculated that the percentage of females obtaining a follow-up screening due to abnormal cytology is 70.52%. This results in higher costs of screening and monitoring costs of adopting a single-dose vaccination to ensure HPV infection, and related health aspects will not increase due to the lower effectiveness of single-dose vaccination [30].
However, Burger et al. [31] sent a letter to the editor of the mentioned publication stating that a recent economic evaluation of 1-dose HPV vaccination by Daniels et al. [30] used unsupported assumptions. The highlights of the letter included the underestimated vaccine efficacy by Daniels et al. [30] vaccine protection waning is unrealistic, and characterization of uncertainty is not evidence-based [31]. In addition, JCVI also assessed Professor Marc Brisson’s modeling study using the HPV ADVISE model, which showed that switching to a one-dose regular HPV vaccination is not expected to significantly raise cervical cancer rates if the lifetime of protection is more than 20 years. Brisson’s modeling did not consider the future impacts of scale-up or current cervical cancer screening programmes as they may result in health losses due to postponed HPV vaccine implementation, particularly in countries with a high burden [32]. Given this, JCVI remarked that the modeling gave reassurance to those who were worried about potential future decline. Nonetheless, JCVI will look at new evidence from the clinical trials and surveillance of the UK program [33].
The coverage of cervical screening also probably strengthens the decision to implement this single-dose vaccination program. As of 2022, the total eligible populations for cervical screening were 10,472,750 (for women aged 25 to 49), and 5,360,285 (for women aged 50 to 64) in England. A total of 67.1% of women aged 25 to 49 had an adequate screening test recorded in the previous 3.5 years. In addition, 74.8% of women aged 50 to 64 had an adequate screening test recorded in the previous 5.5 years. This is a large number, as they targeted 80% coverage of cervical screening [34].
For the vaccination program, Gardasil 9 vaccines would replace Gardasil as the vaccine offered for adolescent HPV and HPV-MSM in 2022. The timeframe depends on when the UK Health Security Agency’s (UKHSA) stock of Gardasil runs out. Both vaccines may be locally accessible in various locations for a while after UKHSA begins to supply Gardasil 9 because teams use their local Gardasil stockpiles at various rates [29] .
Ireland
The Ireland National Immunization Advisory Committee (NIAC) has modified its recommendations regarding how many doses of the HPV vaccine are necessary for young people. A single-dose of the HPV vaccine is now sufficient for those with healthy immune systems. This adjustment was made because current research did not demonstrate a significant variation in the efficacy of the HPV vaccine in individuals with healthy immune systems, aged 9 to 24, who received one, two, or three doses of the HPV vaccine [34] .
The decision to implement single-dose HPV vaccination is also supported by a successful screening program. Based on the report from the National Screening Service, 78.7% programme coverage (standard is 80% and was reached in 2012/2017) was obtained in 2017-2020 through a national cervical screening programme called CervicalCheck. This resulted from almost 3.2 million cervical screening tests provided from September 2008 to March 2020 [35] .
Albania
There are 1.20 million women in Albania who are 15 years of age or older and at risk of having cervical cancer. According to current statistics, 133 women are given a cervical cancer diagnosis each year, and 74 of them pass away from the condition [36] . In response, Albania introduced HPV vaccination in 2022 and introduced 1-dose vaccination for 13-year-old girls in 2023.
Western Pacific Region
Australia
Australia reduced the number of doses of the Gardasil9 administered to children as part of the National Immunization Program from two to one (NIP), as stated on February 6th, 2023, by the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care. This change is supported by the most recent worldwide scientific and clinical research, which demonstrates that in healthy young people, a single dose provides equivalent protection against HPV infection. It is also supported by the World Health Organization immunization expert group, the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (ATAGI), and the United Kingdom immunization expert [37].
Children between the ages of 12 and 13 can receive the HPV vaccine for free through school immunization programs. An immunization clinic at a school, a general practitioner, a local pharmacy, or other primary care providers can administer a catch-up vaccination. Since the implementation of a national school-based vaccination program in 2007, Australia the first nation to provide free HPV vaccinations for 12- and 13-year-old girls and catch-up programs for girls and women under 26 has witnessed a significant decrease in HPV infections. The percentage of 18- to 24-year-old women in the nation who have HPV has decreased from 22.7-1.5% in just ten years [37].
Altogether with the fast action on vaccination, there has been a considerable decline in cervical cancer cases since the National Cervical Screening Program in 1991. Every five years, women and people with cervixes between the ages of 25 and 74 are encouraged by the healthcare provider to undergo a cervical screening test. Women who had received the HPV vaccine participated in cervical screening at a higher rate than women who had not. Participation in 2013-2014 by HPV vaccination status revealed that for women aged 20–24, participation was 46% for HPV–vaccinated women and 33% for unvaccinated women; for women aged 25–29, participation was 57% for HPV–vaccinated women and 44% for unvaccinated women; and for both age groups 20–24 and 25-29, participation in cervical screening increased with an increasing number of vaccine doses received [38]. The National Cervical Screening Program has proven to lower cervical cancer-related disease and fatalities [39].
Tonga
Since 2022, Tonga has started vaccinating children against cervical cancer to girls between 9-14 years of age. The policy in Tonga has recently been changed to introduce a 1-dose HPV vaccine in girls [40] .
America
United States
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (UPSTF) -a voluntary, independent group of specialists in evidence-based medicine and disease prevention-recommends screening for cervical cancer in women aged 21 to 29 years with cytology (pap smear) every 3 years, and for women aged 30 to 65, a screening with cytology alone every 3 years, a high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test every 5 years, or cytology in combination with hrHPV every 5 years [41].
In addition to screening, HPV vaccination has been introduced since 2006. Instead of the original guideline of three doses, the federal Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) now advises 9–14-year-old adolescents to take the HPV vaccine in two doses over the course of six–12 months. Young adults who begin vaccination at ages 15 to 26 should receive three doses spaced out over a six-month period. As a result, 70% of boys and 73% of adolescent girls received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine in 2019 [42].
Latin America
Several countries in the Latin American region with HPV vaccination included in national routine programs have decided to switch to a single-dose schedule, as stated in Table 8 below.
Table 8.
Countries in Latin America Switching to the 1-Dose Schedule
| No. | Country | Year Intro | Policy Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolivia | 2017 | Switch to 1-dose in routine program |
| 2 | Guatemala | 2018 | Switch to 1-dose in routine program |
| 3 | Guyana | 2011 | Switch to 1-dose in routine program |
| 4 | Jamaica | 2017 | Switch to 1-dose in routine program |
| 5 | Mexico | 2008 | Switch to 1-dose in routine program |
| 6 | Peru | 2015 | Switch to 1-dose in routine program |
Source from personal talk/discussion with an expert
Asia
Japan
The HPV vaccine was briefly withheld from June 2013 onward in Japan. However, in November 2021, specialists concluded that the HPV vaccine should be actively recommended. Presently, girls in the sixth grade of elementary school through the first year of high school are frequently given the HPV vaccine, which prevents HPV infection. Women born between April 2, 1997, and April 1, 2006, or between April 2, 1997, and April 1, 2007, should have their regular HPV vaccination when they reach the recommended age [43] .
Japan also provides catch-up for individuals who have not previously received it. From April 2023, women born in 2006 (born between April 2, 2006 and April 1, 2007) will also be eligible for catch-up immunization. The same vaccine is administered in a total of two or three doses at regular intervals. Depending on the age and the vaccine being administered, many vaccination schedules are provided by the government [43].
Bangladesh
Bangladesh adopted the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2016 as part of a two-year demonstration study45. The bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix), administered by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of Bangladesh with financial assistance from the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance). It has been given to girls in fifth grade as well as girls who are not enrolled in school who are between the ages of 10 and 12 living in five chosen areas of Gazipur District, close to the capital city Dhaka. As one of the countries with the highest burden, UNICEF and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, are supporting this program. NITAGs have also recommended switching to a 1-dose schedule in Bangladesh in 2023/2024 [44].
India
Although the HPV vaccine was first made available in India in 2008, the National Immunization Program has not yet incorporated it, and there is little information available regarding the country’s overall HPV vaccination coverage. The launch of CERVAVAC, India’s first locally developed cervical cancer vaccine, was announced by the Indian government in collaboration with the Serum Institute of India on September 1, 2022, promising not only accessibility but also affordability. Similar to Gardasil, it provides defense against four different HPV virus types. However, unfortunately, awareness of the importance of vaccination among women in India is alarmingly low. With the support of NITAG and GAVI, India will be assisted with this vaccination program and have received recommendations to switch to a single-dose schedule starting from this year or the next year [45].
Africa
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde had introduced a vaccine to prevent cervical cancer associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV) for children and adolescents in 2021 [46]. The vaccine program is fully funded by the Cabo Verdean government through the State Budget and involves partnerships with UNICEF and other organizations [47]. Recently, Cabo Verde decided to switch to single-dose HPV vaccination in 14-year-old girls.
Nigeria
Several African nations, notably Nigeria, are now running immunization experimental programs. In Nigeria, GAVI continues to support vaccination efforts using a variety of vaccines. However, as HPV vaccines are not on the list of vaccines that are offered without charge under the National Immunization Program (NIP) in Nigeria, people currently have to pay for them out of their individual money [48]. In effort to increase coverage and follow the WHO direction, UNICEF and GAVI will procure HPV vaccines in this country and recommend switching to a 1-dose schedule in the upcoming two years [49].
Current Indonesian Technical Guidelines for HPV National Plan on Target and Schedule
The agenda for the elimination of cervical cancer has been attempted by Indonesia step by step. HPV was included in the national vaccination program in 2020, initially started in 2018. Current HPV vaccination technical guidelines available by the Indonesian Ministry of Health highlight the target and schedule for HPV vaccination [50]. This implies that:
Target
a. HPV immunization is part of the “Bulan Imunisasi Anak Nasional” (BIAS) or National Month of Immunization for Children aimed for girls or female adolescents in the 5th and 6th grades of elementary school.
b. The program should reach out not only to those who study at formal schools but also to informal schools.
c. Those who do not study at school can receive HPV immunization through the closest public healthcare facilities.
d. Immunization can also be conducted at any places other than healthcare facilities where those usually gather, e.g., orphanages, informal schools, rumah singgah anak jalanan, and many more.
Schedule
a. The first dose is given to female adolescents in 5th grade or age 11.
b. The second dose is given in 6th grade or age 12 with a 12-month interval (min. 6 months) through BIAS.
However, achieving the WHO cervical cancer elimination targets for 2030 is difficult with the current relatively low coverage. HPV vaccination program coverage among girls in Indonesia in 2020 is 8% for the first dose and 7% for the final dose of the target population (among ages 9-14). Fewer than 1 in 10 girls in the primary target cohort in 2020 received their final HPV vaccination dose11. Therefore, to achieve the targets, several revisions to technical guidelines for the HPV vaccination program in Indonesia are urgently needed.
Discussion
Proposed Update to HPV Technical Guideline and/or HPV National Roadmap Plan
The changes in technical guidelines need to highlight the schedule and dose of HPV vaccination based on its effectiveness both clinically and economically. The recommendations for Indonesian technical guidelines for the national HPV vaccination programme include the following:
Schedule
HPV vaccination is aimed at the primarily targeted group of 5th-grade female adolescents or those aged 11.
Dosage
The HPV vaccine is primarily given 1 dose once in a lifetime through BIAS.
Evaluation of Whether Boosters Are Necessary
The evaluation of whether HPV vaccine boosters are required if the immunogenicity of vaccines given to the population decreases over time.
Eligible Age for Immunization – case per case basis
The age limitation of 11-15 years old eligible for HPV immunization at school, if there is any case where the 5th grade students are older than 11 years old e.g., students in Papua and students of special needs school (Sekolah Luar Biasa).
Considering the number of 7 to 15-year-old female adolescents of 19.387.318 and 16 to 64-year-old productive females of 96.336.779 in 2025 (data from the Indonesian Ministry of Health), modeling in a high burden setting is relevant to Indonesia. The adoption of HPV-ADVISE modeling by Marc Brisson of implementing a single-dose vaccine is proven to be a better move than postponing it to prevent more health losses. Considering the low number of cervical cancer-related screenings, the modeling is even better, as Brisson does not consider the scale-up and ongoing screening programme; however, it is able to provide better health impacts [32].
The one-dose schedule of HPV vaccination will be effective in reducing the required budget; hence, increasing the coverage of vaccination by reaching out to more females, particularly adolescents both in schools and outside schools. By considering the cost-offsets from future cancers avoided, routine one-dose HPV vaccination of 9-year-old girls was less expensive than not vaccinating them. One-dose HPV vaccination with equal coverage (70%) prevented 15-16% of cervical cancer cases forty years after routine vaccination began, compared to 21% with two-dose vaccination [51]. In conclusion, a one-dose HPV vaccination could be more affordable than two doses if protection is long-lasting and better coverage can be attained than with a two-dose vaccination.
Considering the beneficial coverage, a single dose of HPV vaccination is also a better choice for efficient vaccination programs. This is because no follow-up vaccination is in a later year. Therefore, the possibilities of technical issues caused by students who move to other schools, and change home addresses can be prevented. These may seem simple but important because such issues will probably affect the accuracy of the database and also become obstacles for final reporting.
This is also to prevent worsening social issues such as black campaigns. Under normal circumstances, some parents choose not to vaccinate their children for various considerations and reasons, most likely fear of substances and black campaign issues. Most parents get bombarded with stories about the harm of vaccines; parents who claimed their children were fine, but no more fine ones once after getting vaccinated [52]. This happened for most of the sake of society in Indonesia once the vaccination program was publicized. Therefore, one dose of HPV vaccine shots could reduce the trust issues resulting from the black campaign, as there will be no follow-up for second vaccine shots.
In conclusions, numerous studies have demonstrated that the single-dose HPV vaccine offers comparable protection to 2 doses. Many nations, ranging from high-income to low- and middle-income countries, have implemented single-dose vaccination programs. To meet the goal of eliminating cancer by 2030, proposed improvements to vaccination programs are advised in light of other nations’ experiences and Indonesia’s large population by implementing single-dose HPV vaccine in the near future.
Future Directions
Following the recent confirmation of single-dose HPV vaccine efficacy and effectiveness, further research is needed to determine whether catch-up and booster vaccinations are required.
Author Contribution Statement
Conceptualization: DS, PR, L, GFG. Formal analysis: DS, PR. Investigation: DS, PR, L, GFG. Methodology: DS, PR, L, GFG. Resources: DS, PR. Manuscript writing and revision: DS, PR.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all participants for their willingness, support, and contributions, particularly the staff of Ministry of health and department of health.
Funding
This work was funded by the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) with the project number UST-002.21.
Conflict of Interest
Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) does not interfere the professional judgment or action regarding the study processes and outcomes.
References
- 1.Published online 2020, authors. Globocan international agency for research on cancer. Int agency res cancer; [Google Scholar]
- 2.Globocan asia. Asia : Globocan 2020 summary statistic. Int agency res cancer; 2021. Available from: https://gco.Iarc.Fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/935-asia-fact-sheets.Pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Globocan. Cancer in indonesia. Int agency res cancer; Published online; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wahidin M, Febrianti R, Susanty F. Burden of cervical cancer in indonesia: Findings from the global burden of disease study 1990–2017. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Park E, Kim JY, Choi S, Kim DS, Oh YL. Carcinogenic risk of human papillomavirus (hpv) genotypes and potential effects of hpv vaccines in korea. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12556 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49060-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Garland SM, Brotherton JML, Moscicki AB, Kaufmann AM, Stanley M, Bhatla N, et al. Hpv vaccination of immunocompromised hosts. Papillomavirus Res. 2017;4:35–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pvr.2017.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Small W Jr, Bacon MA, Bajaj A, Chuang LT, Fisher BJ, Harkenrider MM, et al. Cervical cancer: A global health crisis. Cancer. 2017;123(13):2404–12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Smulian EA, Mitchell KR, Stokley S. Interventions to increase hpv vaccination coverage: A systematic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(6):1566–88. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1125055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saraiya M, Unger ER, Thompson TD, Lynch CF, Hernandez BY, Lyu CW, et al. Us assessment of hpv types in cancers: Implications for current and 9-valent hpv vaccines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(6):djv086. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kreimer AR, Cernuschi T, Rees H, Brotherton JML, Porras C, Schiller J. Public health opportunities resulting from sufficient hpv vaccine supply and a single-dose vaccination schedule. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023;115(3):246–9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.World health organization. Who. 2022. Available from: https://www.Who.Int/news/item/20-12-2022-who-updates-recommendations-on-hpv-vaccination-schedule.
- 12.Kamolratanakul S, Pitisuttithum P. Human papillomavirus vaccine efficacy and effectiveness against cancer. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(12):1–21. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9121413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Julius JM, Ramondeta L, Tipton KA, Lal LS, Schneider K, Smith JA. Clinical perspectives on the role of the human papillomavirus vaccine in the prevention of cancer. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31(3):280–97. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.3.280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kash N, Lee MA, Kollipara R, Downing C, Guidry J, Tyring SK. Safety and efficacy data on vaccines and immunization to human papillomavirus. J Clin Med. 2015;4(4):614–33. doi: 10.3390/jcm4040614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cdc. Center for disease control and prevention. 2021. Available from: https://www.Cdc.Gov/vaccines/vpd/hpv/public/index.html.
- 16.Soliman M, Oredein O, Dass CR. Update on safety and efficacy of hpv vaccines: Focus on gardasil. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2021;10(2):101–13. doi: 10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.10.2.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmerón J, Wheeler CM, Chow SN, Apter D, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus (hpv)-16/18 as04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic hpv types (patricia): Final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet. 2009;374(9686):301–14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61248-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.David MP, Van Herck K, Hardt K, Tibaldi F, Dubin G, Descamps D, et al. Long-term persistence of anti-hpv-16 and -18 antibodies induced by vaccination with the as04-adjuvanted cervical cancer vaccine: Modeling of sustained antibody responses. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115(3 Suppl):S1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Esposito S, Birlutiu V, Jarcuska P, Perino A, Man SC, Vladareanu R, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus-16/18 as04-adjuvanted vaccine administered according to an alternative dosing schedule compared with the standard dosing schedule in healthy women aged 15 to 25 years: Results from a randomized study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(3):e49–55. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318206c26e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee VJ, Tay SK, Teoh YL, Tok MY. Cost-effectiveness of different human papillomavirus vaccines in singapore. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:203 . doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kudo R, Yamaguchi M, Sekine M, Adachi S, Ueda Y, Miyagi E, et al. Bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness in a japanese population: High vaccine-type-specific effectiveness and evidence of cross-protection. J Infect Dis. 2019;219(3):382–90. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rebolj M, Pesola F, Mathews C, Mesher D, Soldan K, Kitchener H. The impact of catch-up bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination on cervical screening outcomes: An observational study from the english hpv primary screening pilot. Br J Cancer. 2022;127(2):278–87. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01791-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gilca V, Sauvageau C, Boulianne N, De Serres G, Crajden M, Ouakki M, et al. The effect of a booster dose of quadrivalent or bivalent hpv vaccine when administered to girls previously vaccinated with two doses of quadrivalent hpv vaccine. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(3):732–8. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1011570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reiter PL, Gilkey MB, Brewer NT. Hpv vaccination among adolescent males: Results from the national immunization survey-teen. Vaccine. 2013;31(26):2816–21. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Steinau M, Unger ER, Hernandez BY, Goodman MT, Copeland G, Hopenhayn C, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence in invasive anal cancers in the united states before vaccine introduction. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17(4):397–403. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31827ed372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Amarenco p, bogousslavsky j, callahan 3rd a, goldstein lb, hennerici m, rudolph ae, sillesen h, simunovic l, szarek m, welch km. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N engl j med. 2011;365:687–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Setiawan D, Hadinegoro SR, Meyta H, Sitohang RV, Tandy G, et al. Cervical cancer prevention in indonesia: An updated clinical impact, cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0230359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.World health organization. One-dose human papillomavirus (hpv) vaccine offers solid protection against cervical cancer. Geneva: World health organization; 2022. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jcvi. Jcvi statement on a one-dose schedule for hpv for the routine hpv immunization programme. Available from: https://www.Gov.Uk/government/publications/single-dose-of-hpv-vaccine-jcvi-concluding-advice/jcvi-statement-on-a-one-dose-schedule-for-the-routine-hpv-immunisation-programme.
- 30.Daniels V, Saxena K, Patterson-Lomba O, Gomez-Lievano A, Saah A, Luxembourg A, et al. Modeling the health and economic implications of adopting a 1-dose 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccination regimen in a high-income country setting: An analysis in the united kingdom. Vaccine. 2022;40(14):2173–83. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burger E, Baussano I, Kim JJ, Laprise JF, Berkhof J, Schiller JT, et al. Recent economic evaluation of 1-dose hpv vaccination uses unsupported assumptions. Vaccine. 2023;41(16):2648–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Burger EA, Laprise JF, Sy S, Regan MC, Prem K, Jit M, et al. Now or later: Health impacts of delaying single-dose hpv vaccine implementation in a high-burden setting. Int J Cancer. 2022;151(10):1804–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cervical screening program in the uk. The first invitation is sent,who has not been invited. Available from: https://www.Gov.Uk/guidance/cervical-screening-programme-overview.
- 34.Human papillomavirus (hpv) vaccine. Hpv vaccination program in schools in ireland. Available from: https://www.Hse.Ie/eng/health/immunisation/pubinfo/schoolprog/hpv/hpv-vaccination-programme/hpv-vaccination-programme.html.
- 35.Available from: . Cervical check program in ireland; september 2017-march 2020.
- 36.Albania human papillomavirus and related cancers. Available from: https://hpvcentre.Net/statistics/reports/alb_fs.Pdf.
- 37.Australia change to single dose hpv vaccine. 2023. Available from: https://www.Health.Gov.Au/ministers/the-hon-mark-butler-mp/media/change-to-single-dose-hpv-vaccine.
- 38.Australia g of. National screening program in australia. 2019. Available from: https://www.Aihw.Gov.Au/reports/cancer-screening/analysis-of-cervical-cancer-and-abnormality/summary.
- 39.Cancer institute nsw. About the national cervical screening program. Available from: https://www.Cancer.Nsw.Gov.Au/prevention-and-screening/screening-and-early-detection/cervical-screening/about-the-national-cervical-screening-program.
- 40.Unicef pacific islands health. Available from: https://www.Unicef.Org/pacificislands/media/3741/file/health programme brief.Pdf.
- 41.Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: Us preventive services task force recommendation statement. Jama. 2018;320(7):674–86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years — united states; 2019. 2019. Available from: https://www.Cdc.Gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6933a1.htm. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Human papilloma virus infection and hpv vaccine in japan. Available from: https://www.Mhlw.Go.Jp/bunya/kenkou/kekkaku-kansenshou28/index.html.
- 44.Hpv vaccine introduced in bangladesh. Available from: https://www.Who.Int/bangladesh/news/detail/18-05-2016-hpv-vaccine-introduced-in-bangladesh.
- 45.Hpv vaccination and the quest to solve india’s cervical cancer problem. Available from: https://www.Thinkglobalhealth.Org/article/hpv-vaccination-and-quest-solve-indias-cervical-cancer-problem.
- 46.Ico. Human papillomavirus and related diseases report. 2016 . Available from: https://www.Hpvcentre.com.
- 47.Girls today, women tomorrow: An hpv vaccine sets a new course for women and girls in cabo verde. Available from: https://unsdg.Un.Org/latest/stories/girls-today-women-tomorrow-hpv-vaccine-sets-new-course-women-and-girls-cabo-verde.
- 48.Akinsolu ft, abodunrin o, adewole ie, olagunju m, gambari ao, raji do, et al. Willingness to pay for hpv vaccine among women living with hiv in nigeria. Vaccines. 2023;11(5):928. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Unicef. Closing the gap: Unicef bolsters country efforts to increase hpv vaccination [internet] 2023. Available from: https://www.Unicef.Org/supply/stories/closing-gap-unicef-bolsters-country-efforts-increase-hpv-vaccination.
- 50.Kesehatan k. Hindal teknis perakanasi bulan imunisasi anak sekolah (bias) 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Burger EA, Campos NG, Sy S, Regan C, Kim JJ. Health and economic benefits of single-dose hpv vaccination in a gavi-eligible country. Vaccine. 2018;36(32 Pt A):4823–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nurlaela n, karlinah s, setianti y, susilawati s. 3rd international conference on transformation in communications . Atlantis press; 2017. Parent trust on the immunization program: Media coverage over counterfeite vaccine in indonesia. [Google Scholar]
