Skip to main content
. 2025 May 29;25:770. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11120-0

Table 3.

Ascertainment (as %) during variant-dominant periods

Complementary SS Comparison with ONS prevalence
Delta BA.1 BA.2
C19PRinH 0.48 (0.4, 0.6) 0.21 (0.2, 0.2) 0.19 (0.2, 0.2)
EDSS 0.04 (0.0, 0.0) 0.02 (0.0, 0.0) 0.01 (0.0, 0.0)
111calls 0.27 (0.2, 0.3) 0.09 (0.1, 0.1) 0.10 (0.1, 0.2)
111web 0.29 (0.3, 0.3) 0.06 (0.1, 0.1) 0.07 (0.1, 0.1)
Comparison with ONS incidence
Delta BA.1 BA.2
P12 42.5 (37.0, 49.1) 30.4 (23.9, 38.1) 8.93 (7.0, 11.3)
HospAdm 0.87 (0.8, 1.1) 0.55 (0.4, 0.6) 0.48 (0.4, 0.7)
ZOE 75.6 (67.6, 84.8) 53.1 (43.7, 66.4) 68.6 (54.4, 110.5)
EDSS 0.42 (0.4, 0.5) 0.16 (0.1, 0.2) 0.11 (0.1, 0.1)
111calls 3.15 (2.8, 3.6) 0.86 (0.7, 1.1) 1.00 (0.6, 1.7)
111web 3.35 (2.8, 3.8) 0.64 (0.5, 0.8) 0.74 (0.4, 1.2)
Comparison with P12 incidence
Delta BA.1 BA.2
HospAdm 2.13 (1.9, 2.5) 1.83 (1.2, 2.3) 7.06 (3.5, 8.8)
ZOE 176.4 (154, 207) 162.9 (121, 277) 949.4 (451, 1411)
EDSS 1.03 (0.9, 1.3) 0.52 (0.5, 0.6) 1.40 (0.8, 1.8)
111calls 6.90 (6.1, 9.1) 2.80 (2.2, 4.1) 12.02 (5.4, 22.2)
111web 7.72 (6.1, 9.1) 2.08 (1.6, 2.8) 8.79 (3.9, 16.8)

Notes: Values are for entire monitoring period, ascertainment percentage median (IQR). Tests for between group differences (in rows) using Welch’s one-way ANOVA were all significant at p < < 0.001