Table 2. Summary of main characteristics and overall risk of bias of studies for outcome prediction of ultrasound in Takayasu arteritis.
Study | Inclusion criteria | Patients (n)With follow-up (n) (%) | Time period follow-up | Investigated structures | US key elementary lesions | Summary of main findings | Overall risk of bias |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ma et al17 | Clinical diagnosis of TAK* | 7777 (100) | 12 months | Carotid | Stenosis, occlusion,↑ IMT, contrast enhancement | Higher IMT at baseline in patients with a progressive disease at 12 months (=more than 20% increase in IMT thickness and lesion range, or aggravations on lumen stenosis or CEUS semi-quantitative analysis) | Moderate |
Wang et al21 | Clinical diagnosis of TAK | 295Not specified | Not specified | Carotid | ↑ IMT, stenosis, IMT/diameter ratio (IDR) | A higher carotid IDR and a lower carotid PSV were associated with a higher risk of neurological severe ischaemic events | High |
1990 ACR criteria.
ACR, American College of Rheumatology; CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound; IMT, intima-media thickness; PSV, peak systolic velocity; SMI, superb microvascular imaging; SUV, standardised uptake value; TAK, Takayasu arteritis.