Skip to main content
. 2025 May 28;11(2):e005738. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005738

Table 3. Summary of main characteristics and overall risk of bias of studies for monitoring disease activity by ultrasound in Takayasu arteritis.

Study Inclusion criteria Patients (n)With follow-up (n) (%) Time period follow-up Investigated structures US key elementary lesions Summary of main findings Overall risk of bias
Ma et al17 Clinical diagnosis of TAK* 7777 (100) 12 months Carotid Stenosis, occlusion, ↑ IMT, contrast enhancement Higher IMT in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2.Higher frequency of grade 1 and 2 enhancements in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2; higher frequency of grade 0 enhancement in patients with a Kerr/NIH score <2.Higher frequency of stenosis <50% in patients with a Kerr/NIH score <2 Moderate
Donget al18 Clinical diagnosis of TAK* 115107 (93) 3–6 months Carotid Stenosis/occlusion, ↑ IMT, contrast enhancement Higher IMT and higher external vessel diameter in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2. Moderate
Contrast enhancement grade showed a significant correlation with disease activity.
Patients with grade 3 enhancement had higher ITAS2010 scores
Svensson et al 19 Clinical diagnosis of TAK (new-onset and chronic)* 25All the 9 patients with new-onset disease 1–13 years Carotid, subclavian, axillary, brachiocephalic, aortic arch Stenosis, occlusion, ↑ IMT ‘Ultrasound index’ IMT of carotids decreased in patients prescribed with medical treatment, while increased in those prescribed with no treatment. High
In seven of the patients (two excluded since they only had axillary stenosis), the ultrasound index significantly decreased between the first and the last evaluation.
Five patients had a flare (symptoms and/or elevated inflammatory laboratory levels): they all showed a sudden increase of IMT and/or increase of vessel diameter and/or increase of velocities in stenotic areas
Wanget al20 Clinical diagnosis of TAK 28No follow-up (cross-sectional) No follow-up (cross-sectional) Carotid Stenosis, occlusion,↑ IMT, contrast enhancement Higher frequency of grade 2 and 3 wall enhancements in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2. Moderate
Contrast enhancement grades positively correlated with disease activity, wall thickness and ESR
Li et al 22 Clinical diagnosis of TAK* 71No follow-up (cross-sectional) No follow-up (cross-sectional) Carotid Contrast enhancement Higher frequency of grade ≥2 wall enhancements in patients with active disease according to the ITAS2010 criteria. High
The sum score of two-sided carotid arteries was higher in patients with clinically active disease.
Total vascularisation score significantly associated with scores on Kerr/NIH criteria and ITAS2010.
Total vascularisation score significantly associated with levels of CRP and ESR.
When visual grade ≥2 on FDG-PET/CT was used as the standard for active vasculitis, US had 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity, positive predictive value of 79.2%, and negative predictive value of 100%
Ma et al28 Clinical diagnosis of TAK* 8438 (45) 3 months Carotid Stenosis, occlusion, ↑ IMT, contrast enhancement IMT higher in the active group (according to Kerr/NIH criteria and ITAS2010). High
In the inactive group, the proportion of stenosis and occlusion was higher.
Grade 2 vascularisation higher in patients with active disease.
Moderate correlation between ESR, CRP, and SAA levels and IMT
Huanget al 29 Clinical diagnosis of TAK* 86Not specified Not specified Carotid Stenosis, occlusion, aneurysm,↑ IMT, contrast enhancement Higher IMT in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2. High
Higher frequency of stenosis in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2.
Mean enhanced intensity of artery wall higher in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2
Sinhaet al30 Clinical diagnosis of TAK* 19No follow-up (cross-sectional) No follow-up (cross-sectional) Carotid, subclavian, renal, femoral, brachial, radial, popliteal, posterior tibial dorsalis pedis, abdominal aorta Stenosis, occlusion, aneurysm, ↑ IMT, ‘CDUS-K’ Significant correlation between the CDUS-K score and ITAS2010 High
Sethet al34 Clinical diagnosis of TAK 37No follow-up (cross-sectional) No follow-up (cross-sectional) Carotid ↑ IMT Higher IMT in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2. High
US-based measurement of the outer diameter appeared to be not a reliable measure (differentiation between the adventitia and surrounding tissues not clear in almost 70% of patients and intra-observer variability was 30%)
Goudotet al35 Clinical diagnosis of TAK* 16No follow-up (cross-sectional) No follow-up (cross-sectional) Carotid Circulating microbubbles (MB) Higher number of MB per second in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2. High
Increased vascular flow rate in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2.
The number of MB significantly correlated with the carotid SUV max and the carotid-to-liver SUV ratio in FDG-PET/CT
Liu et al31 Clinical diagnosis of TAK*§ 96No follow-up (cross-sectional) No follow-up (cross-sectional) Subclavian, carotid, vertebral Stenosis, occlusion, aneurysm,↑ IMT/macaroni sign, contrast enhancement Median SMI grades were higher in patients with a Kerr/NIH score ≥2 High
Lottspeich et al32 Clinical diagnosis of TAK 17No follow-up (cross-sectional) No follow-up (cross-sectional) Subclavian, carotid, axillary ↑ IMT, contrast enhancement Patients withactive disease had a significantly higher maximum IMT compared with inactive patients and maximum IMT showed a significant correlation to diseaseactivity scores (NIH, ITAS) Moderate

Retrospective and case–control studies are italicised.

*

1990 ACR criteria.

No criteria.

Ishikawa’s criteria modified by Sharma et al.

§

2012 international Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Criteria.

ANCA 2012 Workshop on Takayasu Arteritis criteria.

CDUS, colour doppler ultrasound; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FDG-PET/CT, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT; IMT, intima-media thickness; ITAS, Indian Takayasu clinical activity score; NIH, National institute of health; SAA, serum amyloid A; TAK, Takayasu arteritis.