Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0323190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323190

Postpartum hemorrhage incidence and risk factors: Evidence from a multicenter study in Zhejiang Province, China

Xiaoyi Ding 1,, Mustafe Abdi 2,, Bingqing Liu 2, Yuanying Ma 2,*
Editor: Patrick Rozenberg3
PMCID: PMC12121736  PMID: 40440267

Abstract

Objective

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, and its risk factors vary regionally. This study assessed the incidence and determinants of PPH in Zhejiang Province, China.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the Maternity Near Miss Surveillance System in Zhejiang Province, collected from January to December 2020. The cohort included 56,014 pregnant women at a gestational age of 28 weeks or more. PPH was defined as blood loss of ≥500 mL for vaginal deliveries and ≥1,000 mL for cesarean sections within 24 h of delivery. Logistic regression analyzed the risk factors for PPH.

Results

Of the pregnant women, 2,016 (3.60%) experienced PPH. The mortality rate associated with PPH was 1.74 per 100,000 live births. Significant independent risk factors included multiple births (OR 3.10; 95% CI 2.42–3.98; P < 0.01), vaginal delivery (OR 3.00; 95% CI 2.62–3.42; P < 0.01), macrosomia (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.97–2.68; P < 0.01), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.50–2.13; P < 0.01), and a lower educational level (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07–1.36; P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The incidence and mortality rates of PPH in Zhejiang Province are low. Identified risk factors such as multiple births, vaginal delivery, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders, and lower education level can guide interventions to mitigate PPH risk.

Introduction

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), defined as a blood loss exceeding 500 mL within 24 h following vaginal delivery or 1,000 mL post-cesarean section, is a major contributor to maternal mortality worldwide, accounting for over 10% of maternal deaths [1]. Although the direct maternal mortality from PPH in China is declining, its negative impacts on maternal and infant health remain significant. PPH is associated with complications such as maternal anemia, infections, hemorrhagic shock, and coagulopathy. While PPH does not directly correlate with perinatal outcomes, high-risk conditions can lead to adverse effects [2,3]. With the loosening of birth control policies in China, the incidence of PPH is increasing [4]. Therefore, early identification and management of risk factors are crucial for reducing maternal deaths and enhancing perinatal outcomes.

Studies on risk factors for PPH have varied widely, often limited by the scope of single-center studies. A case–control study of 462 women in France identified prior PPH, pre-eclampsia, and macrosomia as risk enhancers [5]. In Ethiopia, a study involving 1,060 women highlighted older maternal age (≥35 years), prolonged labor (>24 h), vaginal or cervical lacerations from instrumental births, and delivery management by medical interns as significant risks [6]. Other recognized risk factors across various studies include anemia, multiparity, obesity, placenta previa/accreta, coagulation disorders, and chorioamnionitis [711].

Reliable evidence regarding risk factors for PPH in the Chinese population is limited. Prior small, single-center studies have identified multiparity, maternal age ≥ 35 years, multiple pregnancies, cesarean delivery, a history of abortion, and macrosomia as risk factors. Since 2016, China has enforced a universal two-child policy in response to an aging population and declining birth rates. This policy change has significantly altered the demographic profile of Chinese pregnant women, who now tend to be older, possess lower educational levels, and exhibit higher rates of assisted reproductive technology use and complicated pregnancies than in the pre-policy era [12,13]. The applicability of previously identified risk factors under the new demographic conditions remains uncertain. Several single-center studies have investigated risk factors for PPH under this new policy but were limited by selection bias. Consequently, comprehensive, large-scale multicenter studies are essential to thoroughly explore risk factors for PPH in the current Chinese context.

This study employed data from the Zhejiang Province Maternal Near-Miss Surveillance System (MNMSS), which encompasses 18 surveillance institutions. The aim was to delineate the incidence of PPH and identify its risk factors, thereby providing a scientific foundation for reducing its incidence.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

This cross-sectional study utilized data from the Zhejiang Province MNMSS, established in October 2010 [14]. The system includes medical institutions with over 1,000 annual deliveries and is stratified by geographic and urban/rural characteristics to ensure representativeness. Nationwide, 326 institutions were sampled. The study population consisted of pregnant women admitted to obstetric departments or combined obstetrics and gynecology departments within these institutions. Women admitted to other departments or those receiving only miscarriage prevention treatments were excluded. In Zhejiang Province, the MNMSS covers 18 institutions (11 tertiary and seven secondary hospitals), comprising 12 county hospitals, four municipal hospitals, and two provincial hospitals. The details of the Zhejiang Province MNMSS and the data collection process are also described elsewhere [15]. Quality control is conducted by county, municipal, and provincial maternal and child health hospitals, which review all monitoring hospitals one to two times annually against jurisdictional standards. If a hospital’s error in reporting obstetric complications exceeds 5%, a complete data recheck is mandated. All institutions in Zhejiang Province have met these quality control standards.

The study included data from women who delivered at these 18 institutions between January and December 2020. Inclusion criteria were delivery at ≥28 weeks of gestation, hemorrhage within 24 h post-delivery, and a bleeding volume of ≥500 mL for vaginal delivery and ≥1,000 mL for cesarean section. Exclusion criteria included unreported or unclear hemorrhage volumes and the patient’s inability to cooperate with medical staff in completing survey forms. Of the 69,134 cases monitored, 56,960 met the inclusion criteria; 56,014 women were ultimately included in the study after excluding 946 due to unclear bleeding information (901) or non-cooperation (45). As this study relied on MNMSS data, it did not require informed patient consent. During data analysis, all information was anonymized to ensure that no personally identifiable information was included.

Data collection and definition

Doctors and nurses at the 18 surveillance sites received training to prospectively collect data from admission to discharge using a tailored data collection form for each woman; this data was subsequently entered into a web-based management system. The forms gathered information on maternal demographics, pregnancy comorbidities, PPH, and perinatal and maternal outcomes. Maternal demographics encompassed maternal age, education level, number of prenatal checkups, parity, cesarean section history, delivery mode, and number of fetuses. Pregnancy comorbidities included hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension; pre-eclampsia; eclampsia; HELLP syndrome), pregnancy-associated cardiac and liver diseases, gestational diabetes, and macrosomia. Perinatal and maternal outcomes covered maternal death, critical illness, neonatal birth status (live birth or stillbirth), discharge status, and Apgar scores. Details on the data collection process have been reported elsewhere [14]. Macrosomia was defined as a birth weight of ≥4,000 g, and PPH as blood loss of ≥500 mL for vaginal delivery and ≥1,000 mL for cesarean sections within 24 h post-delivery [16]. The consistency of PPH assessment and diagnosis was ensured across monitoring agencies, aligning with clinical practice norms.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS 26.0. Normally distributed data were presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) and analyzed with the t-test for two-group comparisons. Non-normally distributed data were described using medians and interquartile ranges, with the Mann–Whitney U test employed for two-group comparisons. Categorical variables were expressed as n (%) and analyzed using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression was applied to explore associations between risk factors and PPH, beginning with univariate logistic regression to assess baseline variables and subsequent adjustment for potential confounders. A multivariate logistic regression model was then constructed, positioning PPH as the dependent variable and including candidate factors as covariates, entered using the entry method. Differences were deemed statistically significant for two-sided P-values < 0.05.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval for the Zhejiang Province MNMSS was granted by the ethics committee of West China Second University Hospital (protocol ID, 2012008). As this study utilized data from the Zhejiang Province MNMSS database without direct patient interaction or personal information collection, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee.

Results

The study included 56,014 pregnant women, with PPH diagnosed in 2,016 (3.60%). The average maternal age at delivery was 31.3 ± 4.7 years. 17.88% of the participants had a junior high school education or lower. Delivery modes included 32,460 vaginal (57.95%) and 23,554 cesarean (42.05%) deliveries. There were 1,396 (2.49%) cases of multiple births, 3,185 (5.69%) cases of macrosomia, and 2,997 (5.35%) cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. There were two maternal deaths (3.50 per 100,000 live births), 248 (4.34‰) stillbirths, and 1,407 (2.46%) cases of neonatal asphyxia (Table 1).

Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics of the PPH and non-PPH groups.

Characteristics Non-PPH
n (%)/x̄ ± s
PPH
n (%)/x̄ ± s
P
Age (years)
 <35 41,629 (77.09) 1,572 (77.98) 0.35
 ≥35 12,369 (22.91) 444 (22.02)
Education level
 College or above 34,309 (63.54) 1,218 (60.42) 0.02
 High school 10,067 (18.64) 406 (20.14)
 Junior high school or below 9,622 (17.82) 392 (19.44)
Number of prenatal checkups
 <5 1,076 (1.99) 59 (2.93) <0.01
 ≥5 52,922 (98.01) 1,957 (97.07)
Parity
 Primipara 27,970 (51.79) 1,077 (53.42) 0.15
 Multipara 26,028 (48.21) 939 (46.58)
Mode of delivery
 Cesarean section 23,138 (42.85) 416 (20.63) <0.01
 Vaginal delivery 30,860 (57.15) 1,600 (79.37)
History of cesarean section
 No 43,457 (80.48) 1,876 (93.06) <0.01
 Yes 10,541 (19.52) 140 (6.94)
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
 No 51,153 (94.73) 1,864 (92.46) <0.01
 Yes 2,845 (5.27) 152 (7.54)
Cardiac diseases
 No 53,755 (99.55) 2,003 (99.36) 0.20
 Yes 243 (0.45) 13 (0.64)
Liver disorders
 No 53,151 (98.43) 1,990 (98.71) 0.32
 Yes 847 (1.57) 26 (1.29)
Gestational diabetes
 No 45,782 (84.78) 1,732 (85.91) 0.17
 Yes 8,216 (15.22) 284 (14.09)
Multiple births
 No 52,682 (97.56) 1,936 (96.03) <0.01
 Yes 1,316 (2.44) 80 (3.97)
Macrosomia
 No 51,016 (94.48) 1,813 (89.93) <0.01
 Yes 2,982 (5.52) 203 (10.07)
Maternal outcomes
 Total 53,998 (100.0) 2,016 (100.0)
 Critical condition 129 (0.24) 175 (8.68)
 Death 1 (0.00) 1 (0.05)
Perinatal outcomes
 Total 55,319 (100.0) 2,100 (100.0)
 Alive 55,084 (99.58) 2,087 (99.38)
 Neonatal asphyxia 1,314 (2.39) 87 (4.17)
 Stillbirth 235 (0.42) 13 (0.62)

Risk factors for PPH

Univariate analyses revealed significant differences between the PPH and non-PPH groups in terms of education level, number of prenatal checkups, mode of delivery, history of cesarean section, multiple births, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and macrosomia (all P < 0.05). After adjusting for potential risk factors, multiple births ([OR] 3.10; 95% [CI] 2.42–3.98; P < 0.01), vaginal delivery (OR 3.00; 95% CI 2.62–3.42; P < 0.01), macrosomia (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.97–2.68; P < 0.01), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.50–2.13; P < 0.01), and lower education level (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07–1.36; P < 0.01) emerged as independent risk factors for PPH (Table 2).

Table 2. Risk factors for PPH.

Characteristics Unadjusted modela Adjusted modelb
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Education level
 Higher education 1 1
 High school 1.14 (1.01–1.27) 0.03 1.21 (1.08–1.36) <0.01
 Junior high school or below 1.15 (1.02–1.29) 0.02 1.20 (1.07–1.36) <0.01
Number of prenatal checkups
 <5 1 1
 ≥5 0.67 (0.51–0.88) <0.01 0.80 (0.60–1.05) 0.11
Mode of delivery
 Cesarean section 1 1
 Vaginal delivery 2.88 (2.59–3.22) <0.01 3.00 (2.62–3.42) <0.01
History of cesarean section
 No 1 1
 Yes 0.30 (0.26–0.37) <0.01 0.65 (0.54–0.80) <0.01
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
 No 1 1
 Yes 1.47 (1.24–1.74) <0.01 1.79 (1.50–2.13) <0.01
Multiple births
 No 1 1
 Yes 1.65 (1.31–2.08) <0.01 3.10 (2.42–3.98) <0.01
Macrosomia
 No 1 1
 Yes 1.92 (1.65–2.23) <0.01 2.30 (1.97–2.68) <0.01

Notes:

aUnivariate analysis via logistic regression.

bMultivariate analysis after adjusting for education level, number of prenatal checkups, mode of delivery, history of cesarean section, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, multiple births, and macrosomia.

Stratified analysis of the mode of delivery indicated that macrosomia (OR 2.87; 95% CI 2.42–3.40; P < 0.01) increased the risk of PPH in women undergoing vaginal delivery. For women undergoing cesarean section, > 4 prenatal checkups (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.28–0.92; P = 0.03) was associated with a significantly lower risk of PPH (Table 3).

Table 3. Risk factors for PPH according to mode of delivery.

Characteristics Total populationa Vaginal deliveryb Cesarean sectionb
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Education level
 Higher education 1 1 1
 High school 1.21 (1.08–1.36) <0.01 1.16 (1.01–1.32) 0.03 1.44 (1.13–1.83) <0.01
 Junior high school or below 1.20 (1.07–1.36) <0.01 1.14 (0.99–1.30) 0.07 1.49 (1.16–1.92) <0.01
Number of prenatal checkups
 <5 1 1 1
 ≥5 0.80 (0.60–1.05) 0.11 0.88 (0.64–1.19) 0.88 0.51 (0.28–0.92) 0.03
Mode of delivery
 Cesarean section 1
 Vaginal delivery 3.00 (2.62–3.42) <0.01
History of cesarean section
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 0.65 (0.54–0.80) <0.01 1.03 (0.68–1.56) 0.90 0.55 (0.44–0.68) <0.01
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 1.79 (1.50–2.13) <0.01 1.60 (1.26–2.02) <0.01 2.00 (1.54–2.60) <0.01
Multiple births
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 1.65 (1.31–2.08) <0.01 3.85 (2.29–6.50) <0.01 2.58 (1.94–3.43) <0.01
Macrosomia
 No 1 1 1
 Yes 2.30 (1.97-2.68) <0.01 2.87 (2.42-3.40) <0.01 1.09 (0.75-1.58) 0.65

Notes:

aMultivariate analysis after adjusting for education level, number of prenatal checkups, mode of delivery, history of cesarean section, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, multiple births, and macrosomia.

bMultivariate analysis after adjusting for education level, number of prenatal checkups, history of cesarean section, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, multiple births, and macrosomia.

Discussion

In this study, the incidence of PPH in Zhejiang Province was 3.60%. Multiple births, vaginal delivery, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and lower education level were identified as independent risk factors for PPH. These risk factors varied in their impact on PPH among different methods of delivery and fetal numbers.

The incidence of PPH exhibits notable regional variations, ranging from 3.2%–6.4% [1719] in developed countries to 9%–25% in developing countries [20,21]. With an incidence of 3.60%, Zhejiang Province’s rates are significantly lower than those in developing countries and align with rates in developed countries. The PPH mortality rate in this study was remarkably low at 1.7 per 100,000 live births, contrasting with the higher rate of 50 per 102,525 live births reported in Northeast India, a region with a similar demographic profile. This rate is comparable to that of France (1 per 100,000 live births) [22,23]. A systematic prevalence review across 26 studies found that the median maternal PPH mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries was 95 per 100,000 live births, significantly exceeding the 5 per 100,000 seen in high-income countries [24]. Evidence suggests that PPH incidence and mortality decrease substantially with improvements in economic and healthcare levels [25,26]. The economic and obstetrical care levels in Zhejiang Province are advanced. In 2020, the per capita gross domestic product in Zhejiang Province exceeded 105,000 yuan, surpassing the global average of 11,033 dollars. The per capita disposable income was 52,397 yuan; the ratio of health personnel to beds was 1.52, one of the highest China [27].

Multiple births, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and macrosomia have been confirmed as independent risk factors for PPH, in alignment with existing literature [28,29]. However, vaginal delivery was identified as a significant risk factor for PPH, which conflicted with previous reports [3032], although it matched the results of a large cohort study that enrolled 18,435 pregnant women [33]. Discrepancies in PPH definitions and methods of estimating blood loss may contribute to the varying incidence rates between vaginal and cesarean deliveries. However, A retrospective analysis of 1,295 maternal cases indicated that the incidence of PPH was higher in women who delivered vaginally than in those who delivered by cesarean section regardless of whether the blood loss cutoff of 500 mL or 1,000 mL was chosen [34], potentially due to clinical tendencies to overestimate blood loss during cesarean sections and underestimate it during vaginal deliveries. Technological advances in cesarean delivery have gradually reduced PPH incidence in this mode of delivery. Additionally, for pregnant women at high risk of PPH, such as those with a scarred uterus, arterial embolization techniques are frequently employed, significantly mitigating PPH risk [35]. Weak uterine contractions and placenta-related complications were prevalent in women with PPH (S1 Table), particularly during vaginal delivery, correlating with higher PPH rates [36].

Additionally, we investigated differences in PPH risk factors based on the mode of delivery; macrosomia was associated with a high risk of PPH in women undergoing vaginal delivery, whereas its correlation with PPH in cesarean sections was less pronounced. These findings support previous research indicating that macrosomia elevates the likelihood of PPH by intensifying intrapartum high-risk factors. There is evidence linking macrosomia with dystocia, protracted labor-induced uterine atony, lacerations of the soft birth canal, and extensive placental separation [37], all identified as risk factors for PPH in vaginal deliveries, culminating in a higher incidence. To mitigate these risks, prenatal checkups should intensively monitor fetal growth and development, with vigilant oversight of vaginal deliveries. Should signs of uterine atony emerge during labor, prompt medication to induce uterine contractions is essential. Enhanced midwifery techniques are also crucial in diminishing the risk of PPH.

We also observed that among women who had cesarean sections, those with five or more prenatal checkups experienced a reduced risk of PPH. This observation is supported by a retrospective analysis of 132 women [38]. Frequent prenatal checkups facilitate the identification of high-risk pregnancies, helping to manage pregnancy complications, control disease progression, and provide timely health education and guidance. Thus, they diminish PPH risk in cesarean deliveries [39]. Simultaneously, a cross-sectional study of 749 pregnant women demonstrated a positive correlation between the number of prenatal checkups and family economic income. Women who underwent more than four prenatal checkups displayed greater economic resources compared to those who had four or fewer. Therefore, they are better positioned to access new health care knowledge and higher-quality health services, thereby reducing the risk of PPH [40]. Initiatives such as creating medical records for pregnant women, devising personalized plans with follow-up reminders, and offering tiered subsidies for prenatal checkups based on economic status can enhance adherence to regular prenatal visits. Such measures are crucial in lowering the incidence of PPH, particularly in cesarean deliveries. However, the relationship between the frequency of prenatal checkups and the onset of PPH has been minimally investigated.

This study also identified an association between educational level and PPH incidence. Lower educational attainment was linked to higher PPH rates, possibly due to younger age and economic disadvantages hindering access to maternal and child health information. This lack of awareness about PPH precludes necessary interventions, a theory supported by a recent survey of 318 Chinese women [41]. Enhancing educational programs for expectant mothers and bolstering both digital and physical platforms for knowledge dissemination can substantially lower PPH rates; further studies are required to substantiate this link.

Evidence suggests that pregnancy comorbidities and multiple births are significant risk factors for PPH [29], potentially leading to intrauterine distress and adverse neonatal outcomes such as stillbirth or asphyxia [2], as also demonstrated in other extensive research [3]. Therefore, reducing PPH incidence is vital for improving maternal and perinatal health and crucial in reducing mortality.

In this study, the two maternal fatalities occurred in district hospitals; one was due to PPH following complications from gestational hypertension and a lack of prenatal care. During a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery, the woman developed amniotic fluid embolism, leading to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), massive hemorrhage, and eventual death after failed interventions. The other death resulted from a subarachnoid hemorrhage complicated by brain herniation. Factors contributing to these outcomes included inadequate prenatal assessment, insufficient midwifery skills at primary care facilities, and delayed referrals. Enhancing facility capabilities to monitor and manage high-risk pregnancies, alongside strengthening midwifery training and labor management, is imperative for reducing maternal mortality risks.

The primary strength of this study was its extensive sample size, encompassing hospitals at provincial, municipal, and county levels, including 11 tertiary and 7 secondary facilities. The study population was representative, and the incorporation of multiple research centers yielded a diverse dataset that enhanced the robustness and generalizability of the findings. The large number of participants also increased the statistical power, facilitating more detailed and reliable conclusions. However, the study had several limitations. First, the data were sourced from the Zhejiang Province MNMSS, and case information might have been underreported. Critical maternal characteristics related to PPH, such as body weight, body mass index, and assisted reproductive technology treatment, were not recorded, potentially introducing confounding bias. Secondly, inconsistencies in PPH measurement methods may have led to errors in PPH estimation. Despite this, the PPH variables were primarily based on clinical diagnoses in medical institutions, aligned with current clinical protocols. Thirdly, the cross-sectional nature of the study was time-sensitive and only reflected the situation in Zhejiang Province at the time of investigation. Finally, the study was geographically limited to Zhejiang Province, significantly restricting the applicability of its findings to other regions.

Conclusion

The incidence of PPH in Zhejiang Province was 3.60%. The study identified multiple births, vaginal delivery, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and low educational levels as independent risk factors for PPH. These identified risk factors may be instrumental in efforts to reduce PPH incidence. Enhanced antenatal care is crucial for timely identification of PPH risk factors, and improved labor management and midwifery skills are essential in mitigating the risk during vaginal deliveries. Particularly following the relaxation of the maternity policy, these measures are vital for increasing natural birth rates, managing cesarean section rates, and improving maternal and infant health outcomes.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Factors associated with PPH.

(DOC)

pone.0323190.s001.doc (31KB, doc)
S1 Dataset. Minimal data set.

(XLSX)

pone.0323190.s002.xlsx (11.7MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for personnel at hospitals who supported us during the data collection process.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project (LGF22H260007) and the National Science Foundation of China (No. 71804162). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller A-B, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guo H, Zhang S, Li H, Li P, Huang X, An J. Prevalence and influencing factors of neonatal asphyxia in 1,226 newborns (in Chinese). Pract Prev Med. 2018;25(9):1111–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2018.09.026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hough A, Shakur-Still H, Roberts I, Koukounari A, Lawn JE. Stillbirths and neonatal deaths among 18 942 women with postpartum hemorrhage: Analysis of perinatal outcomes in the WOMAN trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021; 153 (1): 146–53. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao YY, Yang YK, Shi HY. Current situation and thinking of the researches on postpartum hemorrhage in China (in Chinese). Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet. 2024;40(4):385–8. doi: 10.19538/j.fk2024040101 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Firmin M, Carles G, Mence B, Madhusudan N, Faurous E, Jolivet A. Postpartum hemorrhage: incidence, risk factors, and causes in Western French Guiana. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(1):55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tiruneh B, Fooladi E, McLelland G, Plummer V. Incidence, mortality, and factors associated with primary postpartum haemorrhage following in-hospital births in northwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0266345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maswime S, Buchmann E. Causes and avoidable factors in maternal death due to cesarean-related hemorrhage in South Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;134(3):320–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vats H, Saxena R, Sachdeva MP, Walia GK, Gupta V. Impact of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index on maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes in the worldwide populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2021;15(6):536–45. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ende HB, Lozada MJ, Chestnut DH, Osmundson SS, Walden RL, Shotwell MS, et al. Risk Factors for Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(2):305–23. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bank TC, Ma’ayeh M, Rood KM. Maternal Coagulation Disorders and Postpartum Hemorrhage. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023;66(2):384–98. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Al-Kadri HM, Tariq S, Tamim HM. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage among Saudi women. Saudi Med J. 2009;30(10):1305–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cheng XY, Qian LH, Cheng L, Meng AA. Clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcome of re-birth pregnant women (in Chinese). Chin Gen Prac. 2017;20(20):2485–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2017.20.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yuan X, Li L, He X, Zhong Y, Xia J, Lv X, et al. Analysis on parturition cases in Huzhou maternity and child care hospital before and after the implementation of the universal two-child policy (in Chinese). Chin J Hosp Stat. 2018;33(2):241–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mu Y, Wang X, Li X, Liu Z, Li M, Wang Y, et al. The national maternal near miss surveillance in China: A facility-based surveillance system covered 30 provinces. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(44):e17679. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ma Y, Zhang L, Wang X, Qiu L, Hesketh T, Wang X. Low Incidence of Maternal Near-Miss in Zhejiang, a Developed Chinese Province: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the WHO Approach. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:405–14. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S243414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu X, Chen M. Comparisons of global postpartum hemorrhage guidelines. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet. 2017;33(6):556–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reale SC, Easter SR, Xu X, Bateman BT, Farber MK. Trends in Postpartum Hemorrhage in the United States From 2010 to 2014. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(5):e119–22. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Stralen G, von Schmidt Auf Altenstadt JF, Bloemenkamp KWM, van Roosmalen J, Hukkelhoven CWPM. Increasing incidence of postpartum hemorrhage: the Dutch piece of the puzzle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(10):1104–10. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kaelin Agten A, Passweg D, von Orelli S, Ringel N, Tschudi R, Tutschek B. Temporal trends of postpartum haemorrhage in Switzerland: a 22-year retrospective population-based cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14551. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bazirete O, Nzayirambaho M, Umubyeyi A, Karangwa I, Evans M. Risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage in the Northern Province of Rwanda: A case control study. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ononge S, Mirembe F, Wandabwa J, Campbell OMR. Incidence and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in Uganda. Reprod Health. 2016;13:38. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0154-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Devi KP, Singh LR, Singh LB, Singh MR, Singh NN. Postpartum hemorrhage and maternal deaths in North east India. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;5(11):635. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Morau E, Ducloy JC, Le Roux S, Weber P, Dreyfus M, Comité National d’Experts sur la Mortalité Maternelle. Maternal deaths due to haemorrhage in France 2013-2015. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021;49(1):60–6. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maswime S, Buchmann E. A systematic review of maternal near miss and mortality due to postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;137(1):1–7. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Prata N, Bell S, Weidert K. Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in low-resource settings: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:737–52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S51661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Borovac-Pinheiro A, Priyadarshani P, Burke TF. A review of postpartum hemorrhage in low-income countries and implications for strengthening health systems. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;154(3):393–9. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhejiang Provincial Statistical Bulletin of National Economic and Social Development in 2020 [internet]. Zhejiang Provincial Statistics Bureau. 2020. [cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: http://zjrb.zjol.com.cn/html/2021-02/28/content_3414576.htm?div=-1 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li S, Gao J, Liu J, Hu J, Chen X, He J, et al. Incidence and Risk Factors of Postpartum Hemorrhage in China: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:673500. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.673500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang FF, Xu YL, Liu XH, Zhang GY, Luo RQ, Rao X, et al. The Clinical Analysis of the Reasons and Related Risk Factor for Postpartum Hemorrhage in 135 Cases (in Chinese). Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 30 (2): 144–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liang ZX, Chen DQ. Risk factors and new epidemiological characteristics of postpartum hemorrhage (in Chinese). J Pract Obstet Gynecol. 2012;28(11):897–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2012.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Knight M, Callaghan WM, Berg C, Alexander S, Bouvier-Colle M-H, Ford JB, et al. Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: a review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhu C, Wang Y, Liu H. Analysis of influencing factors of postpartum hemorrhage (in Chinese). China Med Eng. 2012;20(9):61–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Allen VM, O’Connell CM, Liston RM, Baskett TF. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(3):477–82. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00570-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wei Q, Xu Y, Zhang L. Towards a universal definition of postpartum hemorrhage: retrospective analysis of Chinese women after vaginal delivery or cesarean section: A case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(33):e21714. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Niola R, Giurazza F, Nazzaro G, Silvestre M, Nasti G, Di Pasquale MA, et al. Uterine Artery Embolization before Delivery to Prevent Postpartum Hemorrhage. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(3):376–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nishida K, Sairenchi T, Uchiyama K, Haruyama Y, Watanabe M, Hamada H, et al. Poor uterine contractility and postpartum hemorrhage among low-risk women: A case-control study of a large-scale database from Japan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;154(1):17–23. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cui H, Chen J, Liu C. Clinical analysis of the treatment and risk factors of the postpartum hemorrhage between year 2001 and 2011 (in Chinese). J Chin Med Univ. 2013;42(6):532–4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-4646.2013.06.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Qin X, Shuang Y. Analysis of risk factors in 132 cases of postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean section. Maternal Child Health Care China. 2008;26:3676–8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4411.2008.26.01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zeng SL, Zou D, Wang LN, Jing FM. The relationship between prenatal examination and health education and pregnancy outcome (in Chinese). Matern Child Health Care China. 2008;21:2930–2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4411.2008.21.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lu J, He J, Yang L, Liu H, Qiu X. Mediation effect of family income on the association between maternal education level and antenatal care (in Chinese). South China J Prev Med. 2015;41(4):332–6. doi: 10.13217/j.scjpm.2015.0332 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang A, Zhang L, Yang L, Song S, Wang L. Relationship between maternal and child health care knowledge and pregnancy outcome. Matern Child Health Care China. 2017;32(8):1756–8. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Factors associated with PPH.

(DOC)

pone.0323190.s001.doc (31KB, doc)
S1 Dataset. Minimal data set.

(XLSX)

pone.0323190.s002.xlsx (11.7MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES