Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2025 Feb 4;39(8):1024–1031. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004144

Table 2:

Percentage of PWDH HIV who were VLS, year-end 2035.

Scenario R/E Baseline: No CAB/RPV 10% CAB/RPV* 30% CAB/RPV* 50% CAB/RPV* 70% CAB/RPV* 90% CAB/RPV*
Conservative All 69.0% 69.5% (0.5%) 70.0% (1.0%) 71.0% (2.0%) 72.0% (3.0%) 73.0% (4.0%)
Optimistic All 69.0% 70.0% (1.0%) 71.5% (2.5%) 73.5% (4.5%) 75.5% (6.7%) 78.0% (9.0%)
Conservative B/AA 64.0% 64.5% (0.5%) 65.5% (1.5%) 66.5% (2.5%) 67.5% (3.5%) 68.5% (4.5%)
Optimistic B/AA 64.0% 65.0% (1.0%) 67.0% (3.0%) 69.0% (5.0%) 71.5% (7.5%) 74.0% (10.0%)
Conservative H/L 68.0% 68.5% (0.5%) 69.5% (1.5%) 70.0% (2.0%) 71.0% (3.0%) 72.0% (4.0%)
Optimistic H/L 68.0% 69.0% (1.0%) 71.0% (3.0%) 72.5% (4.5%) 74.5% (6.5%) 77.0% (9.0%)
Conservative O 75.5% 76.0% (0.5%) 76.5% (1.0%) 77.0% (1.5%) 78.0% (2.5%) 79.0% (3.5%)
Optimistic O 75.5% 76.0% (0.5%) 78.0% (2.5%) 79.5% (4.0%) 81.0% (5.5%) 83.0% (7.5%)

Numbers in parentheses are the absolute difference in percentage compared to the baseline scenario.

ART = antiretroviral therapy, B/AA = Black/African-American, CAB/RPV = Cabotegravir-rilpivirine, H/L = Hispanic/Latino, O = other racial/ethnic groups besides B/AA and H/L, PWDH = people with diagnosed HIV, VLS = viral load suppression.

*

The percentage refers to the percentage of PWDH with VLS assumed to be on CAB/RPV

The conservative scenario refers to the scenario in which CAB/RPV increases the length of VLS upon cessation of use; the optimistic scenario refers to the scenario in which CAB/RPV is assumed to also improve overall ART adherence.