ABSTRACT
The integrative influence of heat acclimation (HA) protocol characteristics and approach on adaptation kinetics and exercise capacity/performance in the heat remains unclear. Bayesian multilevel regression models were used to estimate adaptations with the number of exposures, exposure duration, ambient temperature, water vapor pressure, and HA approach (e.g., constant workrate) as predictors. Data from 211 papers were included in meta‐analyses with results presented as posterior means and 90% credible intervals. Mean protocol characteristics were as follows: 8 ± 4 exposures, 90 ± 36 min/exposure, 39.1°C ± 4.8°C, and 2.78 ± 0.83 kPa. HA decreased resting (−5 beats·min−1 [−7, −3]) and end‐exercise heart rate (−17 beats·min−1 [−19, −14]), resting (−0.19°C [−0.23, −0.14]) and end‐exercise core temperature (−0.43°C [−0.48, −0.36]), and expanded plasma volume (5.6% [3.8, 7.0]). HA also lowered exercise metabolic rate (−87 mL·min−1 [−126, −49]), increased whole‐body sweat rate (WBSR) (163 mL·h−1 [94, 226]), time to exhaustion (49% [35, 61]) and incremental exercise time (14% [7, 24]), and improved time trial performance (3.1% [1.8, 4.5]). An additional HA exposure increased hemoglobin mass (1.9 g [0.6, 3.2]) and WBSR (9 mL·h−1 [1, 17]), and an additional 15 min/exposure further lowered end‐exercise core temperature (−0.04°C [−0.05, −0.03]) and expanded plasma volume (0.4% [0.1, 0.7]). A 5°C increase in ambient temperature further lowered end‐exercise HR (−2 beats·min−1 [−3, −1]) and a 1 kPa increase enhanced WBSR (37 mL·h−1 [4, 72]). End‐exercise heart rate and core temperature decreased similarly following controlled hyperthermia (−16 beats·min−1 [−18, −14]; −0.43°C [−0.48, −0.36]) and constant workrate HA (−17 beats·min−1 [−18, −16]; −0.45°C [−0.49, −0.42]). HA protocol characteristics influence the adaptive response and may be manipulated to optimize adaptations. A predictor for estimating HA adaptations based on protocol characteristics is available at: https://www.canberra.edu.au/research/centres/uc‐rise/research/environmental‐physiology/exercise‐heat‐acclimation‐predictor.
Keywords: heat adaptation, heat stress, humidity, performance, temperature
1. Introduction
Adaptations to support sustained physical activity (i.e., scavenging and hunting) in warm/hot environments were an important selection factor for human evolution (Lieberman 2015) and thus humans have a unique capacity to adapt by natural selection and develop within‐life phenotypic adaptations (Taylor 2014; Horowitz 2014). As with our early ancestors, physical activity or exercise undertaken in the heat is accompanied by elevated thermal and cardiovascular strain relative to when undertaken in cool/temperate conditions, which contributes to impair exercise performance (Sawka et al. 1979; Périard et al. 2011) and increase the risk of exertional heat illness (Laitano et al. 2019; Périard et al. 2022). Climate change has increased the emphasis on interventions that reduce this exacerbated strain to allow for sustaining the health and performance of athletes, occupational workers, and military personnel (Masuda et al. 2024; Borg et al. 2021). Consequently, strategies to offset the negative effects of environmental heat stress on performance are commonly used by athletes, workers, and military personnel, as well as those in occupational settings, with heat acclimation (HA) considered the most important intervention one can adopt prior to training and competing in the heat (Racinais et al. 2015). The HA phenotype induces adaptations that reduce physiological strain and partly restore heat‐mediated decrements in performance (Lorenzo et al. 2010; Keiser et al. 2015). These integrative adaptations are characterized by increased blood volume as well as enhanced sweating and skin blood flow responses that attenuate the rise in body temperature and reduce cardiovascular strain during exercise in the heat (Sawka et al. 2011; Périard et al. 2021). Recent studies also suggest epigenetic‐mediated long‐term molecular protective adaptations (Murray et al. 2022, 2024). Although the benefits of HA have been reviewed, much less focus has been directed toward understanding the coordinated interorgan communication associated with repeated exercise‐heat exposure and quantifying the physiological systems time frame and magnitude (i.e., kinetics) of adaptation. Understanding the kinetics of HA would provide insight into the sequence/hierarchy of specific organ system adaptation stimuli and communication required to achieve heat‐related performance and health benefits.
Most of the physiological adaptations associated with HA are induced within the first week and are generally considered complete after 10–14 days of exposure (Pandolf 1998; Périard et al. 2015). However, several factors influence the kinetics of heat adaptations, including the active or passive nature of the approach, initial acclimation status, frequency, exposure duration, environmental characteristics (i.e., ambient temperature: T a and partial pressure of water vapor in air: P a), and exercise intensity (Périard et al. 2015). Exercise‐HA is generally recommended over passive approaches for developing adaptations that are more specific to the combination of exercise and environmental heat stress athletes will encounter during competition (Périard et al. 2015; Tyler et al. 2016), which is based on the training principle of specificity (Taylor 2014). Moreover, although consecutive days of HA are the approach most commonly used, heat exposures every 2–3 days appear to induce similar adaptations to daily exposures, albeit over a longer time frame (Fein et al. 1975; Duvnjak‐Zaknich et al. 2019).
Longer HA regimens (> 15 exposures) have been reported in previous meta‐analyses to induce more robust adaptations when compared to medium‐term (8–14 exposures) and short‐term protocols (≤ 7 exposures), particularly for sudomotor adaptations (i.e., whole‐body sweat rate: WBSR; Tyler et al. 2016, 2024). However, the limited number of longer HA protocols restricts the formulation of definitive conclusions regarding the influence of total exposures on different adaptations. In addition to protocol length, it has been suggested that 100 min of daily exposure is the optimal dose for HA (Pandolf 1998). However, this suggestion is largely based on data from over 60 years ago (Lind and Bass 1963) in experimental groups with low sample sizes (n = 3–4) and low exercise intensities (< 40% peak oxygen uptake: O2peak). As such, additional empirical evidence to understand the extent to which exposure duration influences exercise‐HA adaptations is required. Moreover, our understanding of how environmental characteristics impact the adaptive response to exercise‐HA is limited. For example, some studies have reported greater improvements in WBSR when acclimating to an elevated P a (i.e., humid HA) compared to a low/moderate P a (i.e., dry HA; Shvartz et al. 1973; Griefahn 1997; Nielsen et al. 1993, 1997), whereas more recent data reported divergent findings (Tebeck et al. 2020). These data highlight some of the contrasting findings within the literature when acclimating to different time frames, exposure durations, and environmental characteristics, which require further elucidation.
Exercise intensity also appears to influence the adaptative response to exercise‐HA. Houmard et al. (1990) demonstrated that daily moderate‐intensity exercise (~60% O2peak) for 60 min elicited similar reductions in exercising heart rate (HR) and core temperature (T core) when compared to 30 min of daily high‐intensity (~75% O2peak) exercise. However, quantifying exercise intensity during heat training can be challenging for several reasons (Brown et al. 2023). Different HA approaches (e.g., constant workrate, controlled hyperthermia, and controlled HR) result in different absolute (i.e., workrate) and relative (i.e., % O2peak) exercise intensities, and as such levels of thermal and cardiovascular strain throughout each exposure (Périard et al. 2021). Given the challenges associated with accurately quantifying absolute and relative exercise intensity during HA, determining the adaptive response based on different HA approaches and the nature of the adaptive stimulus may be more insightful.
Therefore, the aim of this review was to systematically assess the exercise‐based HA literature and determine how total number of heat exposures, duration of each exposure, T a, and humidity (i.e., P a) influence the kinetics of adaptation. Bayesian multilevel regression models were used to provide estimated changes in resting HR, T core, blood volume (BV), plasma volume (PV), red cell volume (RCV), and hemoglobin mass (Hbmass), as well as end‐exercise HR, T core and skin temperature (T sk), WBSR, local sweat rate (LSR), sweat sodium concentration ([Na+]), exercise capacity and performance, based on HA protocol characteristics. We also explored how different HA approaches influenced the adaptative response and the association between initial resting T core and HR, as well as O2peak, on changes in resting measures following HA. Given that there currently exists only general guidance regarding the implementation of HA (Racinais et al. 2015, 2023; Périard et al. 2021; Saunders et al. 2019), the estimated changes in HA adaptations derived from our models have been made publicly available for use by all (https://www.canberra.edu.au/research/centres/uc‐rise/research/environmental‐physiology/exercise‐heat‐acclimation‐predictor). This predictive resource will provide quantitative guidance regarding expected outcomes based on HA approach and protocol characteristics, contributing to abate physiological strain during exercise‐heat stress.
2. Methods
This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines (Moher et al. 2009; Page et al. 2021). Registration of the review was completed with PROSPERO (CRD42022380238).
2.1. Data Sources
A search using databases MEDLINE, Scopus and SPORTDiscus and CINAHL Plus with Full Text was initially completed on July 8, 2022 and updated on December 19, 2024 for all available literature using first‐, second‐, and third‐order search terms. The electronic search was conducted using the following syntax: “acclim*” OR “adapt*” AND “heat*” OR “hot” OR “warm” OR “humid*” OR “dry” OR “desert” OR “tropical” AND “sweat*” OR “thermoreg*” OR “cardiovas*” OR “train*” OR “exer*” OR “work” OR “performance” OR “body temperature” OR “skin temperature” OR “core temperature” OR “rectal temperature” OR “VO2” OR “sweat loss” OR “body mass loss” OR “local sweat rate” OR “heart rate” OR “skin blood flow” OR “oxygen consumption” OR “plasma volume” OR “blood volume” OR “haemoglobin” OR “thermal strain” OR “subjective measures.” The search strategy was narrowed to include only human participants and full‐text journal articles in the English language.
2.2. Study Selection
Individual papers (i.e., journal article titles) were imported into Covidence (Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia) and screened for duplicates by one author (PM). Titles and abstracts were screened independently by two authors (PM and HB) to assess the relevance of each paper. Two authors (PM and HB) independently screened full‐text articles. Disagreements were discussed further; if an agreement was not reached, then conflicts were resolved by a third author (JP).
Papers were retained if the following criteria were met: (i) peer‐reviewed studies on healthy human participants (≥ 18 years of age) in the English language, (ii) exercise‐based HA interventions (minimum of three exposures between pre‐ and post‐heat response tests), (iii) environmental conditions, total number of exposures, and exposure duration were reported, or a mean/median could be derived from the data provided. Where additional information was required to confirm inclusion, corresponding authors were emailed, and papers were excluded if authors did not respond within 4 weeks from the initial enquiry.
Papers were excluded if: (i) participants had previously been repeatedly exposed to environmental heat stress (< 4 weeks) or were heat acclimatized, (ii) environmental conditions alternated (e.g., from dry to humid conditions) between days within the HA regimen, (iii) exercise HA was induced with liquid perfused garments, sauna suits, or extra clothing, or (iv) HA was induced via passive heat exposure (e.g., sauna or hot water immersion) in isolation or alongside exercise‐HA.
2.3. Outcome Measures
Data were extracted from included papers independently by at least two authors (PM, HB, TT, MK, and WJ) for the following details: sample size, age, height, body mass, and O2peak of participants, as well as HA regimen details (i.e., number of exposures, duration of exposures and HA approach) and environmental conditions (T a and relative humidity: RH, from which P a was calculated). Training status was also extracted based on the McKay et al. (2022) classification framework (Table 1). Outcome variables extracted included T core, T sk, HR, metabolic rate during exercise at a constant workrate, WBSR, LSR, sweat [Na+], BV, PV, RCV, Hbmass, constant workrate exercise capacity (i.e., time to exhaustion), incremental exercise to exhaustion (i.e., O2peak test completion time), and performance (i.e., self‐paced exercise time and mean power output). Both resting and end‐exercise T core and HR were extracted. Where data were only presented in figures, they were estimated via an online digital extraction tool (Rohatgi 2020). Where data were published in multiple companion papers, as verified by identical participant characteristics, they were only included in the analysis once.
TABLE 1.
Summary of the participants, heat acclimation protocol characteristics, and risk of bias score for papers that met the inclusion criteria.
| Reference | Participant characteristics (n/sex, athlete caliber) | Exercise modality and HA approach | HA frequency and duration | HA conditions (T a (°C), RH (%), P a [kPa]) | McMaster risk of bias (/8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams et al. (2017) | 17/M, − | Treadmill running and/or cycling; Intermittent exercise and controlled hyperthermia (four intervals sessions at 60%–80% O2peak with 5 min rest, six sessions with target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × ~126 min | 40.0, 40, 2.90 | 5 |
| Alkemade et al. (2022) | 11/M, 6/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × ~97 min | 33.0, 65, 3.30 | 5 |
| Alkemade et al. (2021) | 15/M, 9/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × ~97 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | 5 |
| Allan (1965) | 13, −, − | Circuit training; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.3°C) | 14 × 180 min | 44.0, 45, 4.11 | 4 |
| Amano et al. (2016) | 7/M, Tier 0 | Cycling; Constant workrate (2 × 30 min periods at 50% O2peak followed by 10 min rest) | 7 × 80 min | 32.0, 50, 2.38 | 5 |
| Amano et al. (2015) | 9/M, Tier 0 | Cycling; Constant workrate (2 × 30 min periods at 50% O2peak followed by 10 min rest) | 7 × 80 min | 32.0, 50, 2.38 | 6 |
| Amorim et al. (2011) | 10/M, 2/F, − | Treadmill walking/running; Constant workrate (5 min warm‐up at 5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient, followed by 2 × 50 min periods at 56% O2peak with 15 min between) | 10 × ~84 min | 42.5, 27, 2.27 | 6 |
| Aoyagi et al. (1994) | 7/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 5 |
| 9/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | ||
| Aoyagi et al. (1995b) | 6/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 6 |
| 9/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | ||
| Aoyagi et al. (1995a) | 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 6 |
| 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 12 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | ||
| Aoyagi et al. (1998) | 9/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 6 |
| 6/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | ||
| 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | ||
| 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (45%–55% O2peak) | 12 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | ||
| Armstrong et al. (1989) | 13/M, − | Treadmill running; Intermittent exercise (alternating between running at 65% O2peak and standing) | 8 × 100 min | 41.2, 39, 3.07 | 5 |
| Armstrong et al. (1990) | 5/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 5% gradient) | 7 × 90 min | 40.1, 25, 1.85 | 6 |
| Armstrong et al. (1987) | 14/M, − | Treadmill running; Intermittent exercise (intermittent bouts of self‐selected running speeds) | 8 × 100 min | 41.2, 39, 3.07 | 6 |
| Avellini, Kamon, et al. (1980) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 2% gradient) | 10 × 120 min | 36.0, 76, 4.52 | 6 |
| Avellini, Shapiro, et al. (1980) | 10/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4.8 km·h−1, 0% gradient) | 6 × 120 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 6 |
| 9/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4.8 km·h−1, 0% gradient) | 6 × 120 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | ||
| Avellini et al. (1982) | 5/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (30% O2peak) | 10 × 120 min | 49.0, 21, 2.46 | 6 |
| Barberio et al. (2015) | 8/M, − | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 4 mmol·L−1 blood lactate until volitional exhaustion or an increase in T core of 1.5°C) | 5 × ~25 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 6 |
| Bass and Jacobson (1965) | 12/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (6.1 km·h−1, 0% gradient: No drug group) | 10 × 100 min | 48.8, 18, 2.09 | 4 |
| Best et al. (2014) | 7/−, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (70% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 35.0, 40, 2.25 | 6 |
| Borg et al. (2020) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (50% PPO) | 5 × 60 min | 35.0, 50, 2.81 | 7 |
| Brade et al. (2013) | 10/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (8–12 bouts of 3 min at 80% PPO with 1 min passive rest between) | 5 × 40 min | 35.0, 60, 3.37 | 7 |
| Brock et al. (1982) | 5/F, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (52% O2peak) | 8 × 120 min | 40.6, 42, 3.20 | 6 |
| Buono et al. (1998) | 9/M, − | Treadmill walking and Cycling; Constant workrate (4 × 25 min periods at 4.8 km·h−1, 3% gradient/75 W with 5 min rest between) | 7 × 120 min | 35.0, 75, 4.22 | 5 |
| Buono et al. (2007) | 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (3 × 30 min periods at 28%, 38%, and 47% O2peak with 10 min seated rest in cool conditions between) | 10 × 90 min | 39.3, 47, 3.32 | 5 |
| Buono et al. (2009) | 3/M, 5/F, Tier 0 | Treadmill walking and Cycling; Constant workrate (50% of age‐adjusted predicted HR reserve on day 1, then the same absolute work‐rate matched) | 10 × 90 min | 35.0, 40, 2.25 | 5 |
| Buono et al. (2018) | 3/M, 1/F, − | Treadmill walking; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 37.8°C, 38.1°C, and 38.5°C for 40 min periods each) | 7 × 120 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 4 |
| Burk et al. (2012) | 21/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at 55% O2peak for first 5 days, then 60% O2peak for final 5 days with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 110 min | 42.0, 18, 1.48 | 5 |
| Callovini et al. (2021) | 12/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (10 min at 30% PPO and 80 min at 50% PPO) | 3 × 90 min | 35.0, 50, 2.81 | 3 |
| Campbell et al. (2022) | 8/M, 5/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target increase T core: 1.5°C or maximum tolerable workrate) | 5 × 60 min | 40.0, 52, 3.84 | 7 |
| Casadio et al. (2016) | 2/M, Tier 4 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO for HR corresponding to 60%–70% O2peak) | 5 × 60 min | 35.0, 60, 3.37 | 3 |
| Castle et al. (2011) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (50% O2peak) | 10 × 60 min | 33.0, 52, 2.62 | 5 |
| Chalmers et al. (2016) | 9/M, Tier 2 | Treadmill running; Intermittent exercise (8 min at RPE 11, 12 min at RPE 13, 8 min at RPE 15, 4 min at RPE 17, and a 2 min warm‐down at RPE 9) | 5 × 38 min | 35.0, 30, 1.69 | 6 |
| Chen and Elizondo (1974) | 4/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (75 W) | 9 × 90 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 5 |
| Chen et al. (2013) | 7/M, Tier 3 | Cycling; Constant workrate (10% below ventilatory threshold in first session 1 and increased by 5% with each session) | 5 × ~35 min | 38.0, 52, 3.45 | 8 |
| Cheuvront et al. (2008) | 9/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 4% gradient) | 9 × ~93 min | 45.0, 20, 1.92 | 6 |
| Chinevere et al. (2008) | 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 4% gradient) | 10 × 100 min | 45.0, 20, 1.92 | 5 |
| Ciuha et al. (2021) | 12/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 35.0, 50, 2.81 | 4 |
| Cleland et al. (1969) | 3/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 2.5%–4% gradient) | 7 × 52 min | 42.2, 29, 2.40 | 3 |
| Corbett et al. (2022) | 16/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 8 × 90 min | 40.0, 50, 3.69 | 7 |
| Curley and Hawkins (1983) | 6/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Intermittent exercise (alternating between running at 50% O2peak and resting) | 10 × 155 min | 33.3, 75, 3.84 | 5 |
| Daanen et al. (2011) | 15/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (45 min at 45% O2peak followed by 5 min rest then incremental exercise to volitional exhaustion, with 5 min rest between bouts) | 9 × ~103 min | 35.0, 29, 1.63 | 6 |
| Dawson et al. (1989) | 5/M, − | Treadmill running; Intermittent exercise (4× bouts of 7.5 s at 15 km·h−1 every 30 s, 15% gradient for 15 min with 5 min rest periods) | 7 × 80 min | 34.3, 65, 3.52 | 6 |
| Dileo et al. (2016) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (2 × 45 min periods at 50% O2peak with 15 min rest between) | 5 × 105 min | 45.0, 20, 1.92 | 5 |
| Dini et al. (2007) | 14/M, Tier 4 | Rowing; Constant workrate (50% O2peak) | 10 × 90 min | 36.0, 30, 1.78 | 5 |
| Duvnjak‐Zaknich et al. (2019) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (8 × 10 s cycling efforts for 4–7 sets with 2–3 min rest between sets; Intermittent exposure group) | 8 × ~41 min | 35.0, 60, 3.37 | 8 |
| 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (8 × 10 s cycling efforts for 4–7 sets with 2–3 min rest between sets; Daily exposure group) | 8 × ~41 min | 35.0, 60, 3.37 | ||
| Epstein et al. (2010) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5 km·h−1, 2% gradient) | 12 × 120 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 3 |
| Febbraio et al. (1994) | 13/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (50% O2peak) | 7 × 90 min | 40.0, 20, 1.48 | 5 |
| Fein et al. (1975) | 6/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.2 km·h−1, 2% gradient; Intermittent exposure group) | 10 × ~81 min | 46.5, 15, 1.66 | 5 |
| 6/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.2 km·h−1, 2% gradient; Daily exposure group) | 10 × ~81 min | 46.5, 15, 1.66 | ||
| Finberg and Berlyne (1977) | 4/M, − | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO to achieve HR of 150–170 beats·min−1) | 7 × 100 min | 50.0, 12, 1.48 | 5 |
| Flouris et al. (2014) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (50% O2peak) | 14 × 90 min | 40.0, 20, 1.48 | 5 |
| Fortney and Senay (1979) | 9/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (30% O2peak) | 21 × 90 min | 45.0, 30, 2.87 | 6 |
| Francesconi et al. (1977a) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1) | 7 × 90 min | 49.0, 18, 2.11 | 6 |
| Francesconi et al. (1977b) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1) | 7 × 90 min | 49.0, 18, 2.11 | 6 |
| Francesconi et al. (1978) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1) | 7 × 90 min | 49.0, 18, 2.11 | 6 |
| Frank et al. (2001) | 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5 min rest followed by 2 × 50 min periods at ~350 W with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 115 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 4 |
| Frye and Kamon (1983) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (25%–30% O2peak, humid HA only) | 7 × 120 min | 37.0, 60, 3.77 | 5 |
| 4/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (25%–30% O2peak, humid HA only) | 7 × 120 min | 37.0, 60, 3.77 | ||
| Frye and Kamon (1981) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (25%–30% O2peak) | 8.5 × 120 min | 48.0, 15, 1.67 | 6 |
| 4/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (25%–30% O2peak) | 8.5 × 120 min | 48.0, 15, 1.67 | ||
| Fujii et al. (2012) | 10/M, Tier 0 | Cycling; Constant workrate (4 × 20 min bouts of 50% O2peak with 10 min rest between) | 6 × 110 min | 37.0, 50, 3.14 | 8 |
| Gale et al. (2021) | 10/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (5 min warm‐up followed by six sets of 5 × 10 s sprints with 30 s active recovery between, and 2 min passive rest between sets) | 6 × 40 min | 35.0, 50, 2.81 | 7 |
| Garden et al. (1966) | 12/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (50 min at 5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient, followed by 10 min rest) | 7 × 60 min | 36.7, 73, 4.51 | 4 |
| 13/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (2 periods of 50 and 30 min at 5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient, with 10 min rest after each period) | 7 × 100 min | 36.7, 73, 4.51 | ||
| 13/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (2 periods of 50 min at 5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient, with 10 min rest after each period) | 7 × 120 min | 36.7, 73, 4.51 | ||
| Garrett et al. (2012) | 8/M, Tier 4 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 5 × 90 min | 40.0, 60, 4.43 | 5 |
| Garrett et al. (2019) | 10/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 5 × 90 min | 39.5, 60, 4.31 | 6 |
| Garrett et al. (2009) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 5 × 90 min | 39.5, 60, 4.31 | 5 |
| Garrett et al. (2014) | 9/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Dehydration group) | 5 × 90 min | 40.0, 60, 4.43 | 7 |
| 9/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Euhydration group) | 5 × 90 min | 40.0, 60, 4.43 | ||
| Gerrett et al. (2021) | 5/M, 3/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Controlled hyperthermia group) | 10 × ~97 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | 7 |
| 5/M, 3/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Controlled hyperthermia re‐acclimation group) | 5 × ~100 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | ||
| 5/M, 3/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Immersion group) | 10 × ~97 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | ||
| 5/M, 3/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Control group) | 10 × ~97 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | ||
| Gibson, Mee, Taylor, et al. (2015) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (50% O2peak) | 10 × 90 min | 40.2, 39, 2.81 | 7 |
| 8/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 40.2, 39, 2.81 | ||
| 8/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C on days 1–5, target T core: 39°C on days 6–10) | 10 × 90 min | 40.2, 39, 2.81 | ||
| Gibson, Mee, Tuttle, et al. (2015) | 8/M, − | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (50% O2peak) | 10 × 90 min | 40.2, 39, 2.91 | 5 |
| 8/M, − | Treadmill running; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 40.2, 39, 2.91 | ||
| 8/M, − | Treadmill running; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C on days 1–5, target T core: 39°C on days 6–10) | 10 × 90 min | 40.2, 39, 2.91 | ||
| Gibson, Turner, et al. (2015) | 8/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 40.2, 41, 3.06 | 6 |
| Givoni and Goldman (1973) | 24/−, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1) | 7 × 100 min | 49.0, 20, 1.15 | 4 |
| Greenleaf et al. (1983) | 5/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (75 W) | 8 × 120 min | 39.8, 50, 3.65 | 6 |
| Greenleaf et al. (1985) | 6/F, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (~44 O2peak) | 12 × 120 min | 40.0, 42, 3.28 | 6 |
| 4/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (~49 O2peak) | 12 × 120 min | 40.0, 42, 3.28 | ||
| Greenleaf et al. (1981) | 5/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (~47% O2peak) | 8 × 120 min | 39.8, 50, 3.65 | 6 |
| Griefahn (1997) | 6/M, 2F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4 × 25 min at 4 km·h−1, 0% gradient with 3–5 min rest) | 15 × 122 min | 37.0, 71, 4.42 | 6 |
| 6/M, 2/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4 × 25 min at 4 km·h−1, 0% gradient with 3–5 min rest) | 15 × 122 min | 50.0, 15, 1.90 | ||
| Guy et al. (2016) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (3 min warm‐up followed by 4 × 10 min intervals at 55% O2peak with 3 min rest between) | 7 × 40 min | 35.0, 70, 3.94 | 8 |
| Hahn et al. (1986) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 6 × 60 min | 33.0, 67, 3.34 | 1 |
| Hanson et al. (2022) | 6/M, 1/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (58% PPO) | 12 × 60 min | 30.0, 80, 3.39 | 5 |
| Haroutounian et al. (2021) | 7/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C–38.7°C; Euhydration group) | 7 × 90 min | 40.0, 35, 2.58 | 8 |
| 7/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C–38.7°C; Dehydration group) | 7 × 90 min | 40.0, 35, 2.58 | ||
| Heled et al. (2012) | 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5 km·h−1, 2% gradient) | 12 × 120 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 5 |
| Hertig and Sargent 2nd (1963) | 5/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient) | 10 × 120 min | 45.0, 21, 2.01 | 3 |
| Hodge et al. (2013) | 5/M, 3/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (~39% O2peak) | 8 × 90 min | 35.3, 40.2, 2.30 | 5 |
| Hom et al. (2012) | 11/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 5% gradient) | 11 × 90 min | 33.0, 40, 2.01 | 5 |
| Horstman and Christensen (1982) | 6/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (40% O2peak) | 11 × ~91 min | 45.0, 14, 1.34 | 5 |
| 4/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (40% O2peak) | 11 × ~108 min | 45.0, 14, 1.34 | ||
| Horvath and Shelley (1946) | 16/M, − | Marching; Constant workrate (4.7 km·h−1) | 14 × 60 min | 48.9, 37, 4.32 | 4 |
| Houmard et al. (1990) | 9/M, Tier 2 | Treadmill walking or running; Constant workrate (40%–50% O2peak; Low‐intensity group) | 7 × 60 min | 40.0, 27, 1.99 | 5 |
| 9/M, Tier 2 | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (75% O2peak; High‐intensity group) | 7 × 35 min | 40.0, 27, 1.99 | ||
| Inoue et al. (1999) | 5/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (35% O2peak) | 8 × ~87 min | 43.0, 30, 2.59 | 5 |
| James et al. (2017) | 8/M, 1/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 5 × 90 min | 36.6, 59, 3.62 | 6 |
| James et al. (2018) | 8/M, 1/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 5 × 90 min | 37.0, 60, 3.77 | 6 |
| Joy et al. (1964) | 21/M, − | Marching; Constant workrate (22.53 km) | 12 × 210 min | 44.7, 44, 4.11 | 5 |
| Kaldur et al. (2013) | 21/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at 55% O2peak on days 1–5, 60% O2peak on days 6–10) | 10 × 110 min | 42.0, 18, 1.48 | 5 |
| Kaldur et al. (2014) | 21/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at 55% O2peak on days 1–5 and 60% O2peak on days 6–10, with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 110 min | 42.0, 18, 1.48 | 5 |
| Kaufman et al. (1988) | 8/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (50% O2peak) | 10 × ~77 min | 39.0, 30, 2.10 | 5 |
| Keiser et al. (2015) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to HR at 50% O2peak) | 10 × 90 min | 38.0, 30, 1.99 | 7 |
| Kelly et al. (2016) | 7/M, Tier 3 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (3 min warm‐up followed by 3 × 5 min periods of alternating intervals of 30 s at 90% and 30% O2peak with 3 min active recovery at 50% O2peak between sets) | 5 × 27 min | 38.7, 34, 2.37 | 8 |
| King et al. (1985) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with ~55% O2peak) | 8 × 90 min | 39.7, 31, 2.25 | 5 |
| Kirby and Convertino (1986) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: ≤ 39.5°C) | 10 × 120 min | 40.0, 45, 3.32 | 5 |
| Kirby et al. (2019) | 8/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 9 × ~93 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 6 |
| Kirwan et al. (1987) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 8 × 90 min | 39.6, 29, 2.11 | 5 |
| Kissling et al. (2022) | 8/M, 5/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core increase: 1.5°C) | 5 × 60 min | 40.0, 52, 3.84 | 7 |
| Klous et al. (2021) | 10/M, 5/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Controlled hyperthermia group) | 10 × ~100 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | 4 |
| 4/M, 2/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Controlled hyperthermia re‐acclimation group) | 5 × ~100 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | ||
| Klous et al. (2020) | 6/M, 2/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Controlled hyperthermia group) | 10 × ~100 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | 4 |
| 4/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Controlled hyperthermia re‐acclimation group) | 5 × ~100 min | 33.0, 65, 3.27 | ||
| Kotze et al. (1977) | 4/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (~35 W) | 10 × 240 min | 33.9, 89, 4.71 | 4 |
| Kristal‐Boneh et al. (1995) | 14/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (25% O2peak) | 7 × 90 min | 42.0, 25, 2.40 | 5 |
| Kuennen et al. (2011) | 8/M, − | Treadmill running; Controlled hyperthermia (50 min of exercise to reach T core of 39°C, followed by 50 min with T core ≥ 39°C with 10 min rest between) | 7 × 110 min | 46.5, 20, 2.07 | 6 |
| Lee and Thake (2017) | 7/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 10 × 60 min | 40.0, 25, 1.27 | 6 |
| Lee et al. (2016) | 7/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 10 × 60 min | 40.0, 25, 1.84 | 6 |
| Lind and Bass (1963) | 4/−, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient; 50 min exposure daily group) | 9 × 50 min | 49.0, 18, 1.01 | 3 |
| 3/−, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient; 50 min exposure twice‐daily group) | 9 × 100 min | 49.0, 18, 1.01 | ||
| 3/−, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient; 100 min exposure daily group) | 9 × 100 min | 49.0, 18, 1.01 | ||
| 3/−, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient; 100 min exposure twice‐daily group) | 9 × 200 min | 49.0, 18, 1.01 | ||
| Loeppky (2015) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 30% O2peak) | 9 × 100 min | 50.0, 16, 1.97 | 5 |
| Lorenzo et al. (2010) | 10/M, 2/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (two periods of 45 min at PO associated with 50% O2peak, with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 100 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 7 |
| Lorenzo and Minson (2010) | 10/M, 2/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (two periods of 45 min at PO associated with 50% O2peak, with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 100 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 7 |
| Lundby et al. (2021) | 9/M, 2/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO corresponding to 45% of PO at 4 mmol·L−1 blood lactate) | 10 × 50 min | 35.1, 62, 3.48 | 6 |
| Lynch et al. (2024) | 9/M, 6/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (120 min at a fixed H prod of 275 W·m2) and controlled HR (90 min at 75% HRmax) | 7 × ~107 min | 37.0, 49, 3.08 | 6 |
| Magalhães et al. (2010) | 9/M, − | Treadmill running; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core increase: 1°C) | 11 × 60 min | 40.0, 45.2, 3.33 | 6 |
| Mang et al. (2021) | 7/M, 6/F, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (two periods of 45 min at 30%–40% O2peak, with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 100 min | 43.0, 40, 3.46 | 6 |
| Matias et al. (2023) | 12/M, 6/F, − | Treadmill running; Intermittent exercise (5 min warm‐up at 5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient, followed by eight periods of 30 s running at 80% APMHR with 90 s active recovery at 50% APMHR) | 6 × 31 min | 30.0, 50, 2.12 | 8 |
| McCleave et al. (2020) | 11/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (varying intervals from 55% to 85% of PPO with 2–7.5 min rest periods between) | 12 × 60 min | 32.0, 50, 2.38 | 6 |
| McCleave et al. (2019) | 6/M, 3/F, Tier 2 | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (45 min at speed associated with 65% O2peak, followed by 45 min individualized cooldown) and Intermittent exercise (20 min warm‐up, followed by intervals of 80%–100% O2peak with 60 s to 3 min rest periods between, and a 20 min cooldown) | 9 × 90 min | 32.7, 59, 2.91 | 6 |
| McCleave et al. (2017) | 6/M, 3/F, Tier 2 | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (45 min at speed associated with 65% O2peak, followed by 45 min individualized cooldown) and Intermittent exercise (20 min warm‐up, followed by intervals of 80%–100% O2peak with 60 s to 3 min rest periods between, and a 20 min cooldown) | 9 × 90 min | 33.0, 60, 3.02 | 6 |
| McClung et al. (2008) | 7/M, 1/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 4% gradient) | 10 × ~87 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 6 |
| McGlynn et al. (2022) | 10/F, Tier 0 | Cycling; Self‐paced (RPE 15) | 14 × 60 min | 33.0, 40, 2.01 | 7 |
| McIntyre et al. (2021) | 9/M, − | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 65% O2peak) | 6 × ~52 min | 33.0, 40, 2.01 | 8 |
| McIntyre et al. (2022) | 7/M, − | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 65% O2peak) | 12 × ~57 min | 33.0, 40, 2.01 | 7 |
| McLellan and Aoyagi (1996) | 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (Speed and gradient associated with 45%–55% O2peak) | 12 × 60 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 5 |
| Mee et al. (2015) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 6 |
| 8/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | ||
| Mee et al. (2016) | 5/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 6 |
| 5/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | ||
| Mikkelsen et al. (2019) | 12/M, Tier 3 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 60% O2peak) | 28 × 60 min | 37.5, 30, 1.93 | 7 |
| Mitchell et al. (1976) | 4/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 40%–50% O2peak with 5 min rest periods every 60 min) | 10 × 240 min | 45.0, 41, 3.93 | 2 |
| Mitchell et al. (2021) | 13/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5 km·h−1, 2% gradient) | 8 × 125 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 6 |
| Molloy et al. (2013) | 7/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 75% O2peak; Middle‐aged group) | 14 × 30 min | 35.0, 35, 1.97 | 5 |
| 9/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 75% O2peak; Young group) | 14 × 30 min | 35.0, 35, 1.97 | ||
| Mornas et al. (2023) | 8/M, 7/F, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 1.3–2.5 W·kg−1) | 13 × 60 min | 38.1, 58, 3.86 | 7 |
| Moss et al. (2020) | 13/M, 3/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 60 min | 40.0, 50, 3.69 | 4 |
| Naito et al. (2022) | 7/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (60 × 5 s sprint, 25 s unloaded pedaling and 30 s passive rest, with 10 min rest at the halfway point) | 5 × 82 min | 36.5, 50, 4.50 | 7 |
| Neal, Corbett, et al. (2016) | 10/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C–38.7°C) | 5 × ~85 min | 40.0, 50, 3.69 | 5 |
| Neal, Massey, et al. (2016) | 8/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Euhydration group) | 8 × ~93 min | 40.0, 50, 3.69 | 7 |
| 8/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Dehydration group) | 8 × ~91 min | 40.0, 50, 3.69 | ||
| Neufer et al. (1989) | 10/M, − | Treadmill walking or running; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at 50% O2peak with 10 min rest between) | 7 × 110 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 5 |
| Nielsen et al. (1993) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 55% O2peak to volitional exhaustion) | 10.5 × ~64 min | 41.0, 13, 0.97 | 4 |
| Nielsen et al. (1997) | 12/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 45% O2peak to volitional exhaustion) | 10.5 × ~48 min | 35.0, 87, 4.89 | 4 |
| Notley et al. (2018) | 12/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 8 × 90 min | 40.0, 37, 2.73 | 5 |
| Oberholzer et al. (2019) | 12/M, Tier 3 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 60% O2peak) | 28 × 60 min | 37.5, 30, 1.93 | 8 |
| Oöpik et al. (2014) | 20/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at 55% O2peak on days 1–5 and 60% O2peak on days 6–10, with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 110 min | 42, 18, 1.48 | 5 |
| Osborne et al. (2021) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% PPO) | 5 × 60 min | 34.9, 53, 2.96 | 8 |
| O'Toole et al. (1983) | 4/F, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (2 × 60 min periods at PO associated with 46% O2peak, with 5 min rest between) | 10 × 125 min | 40.0, 50, 4.93 | 4 |
| Pandolf et al. (1977) | 24/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at 4.8 km·h−1, 0% gradient, with 10 min rest between) | 9 × 110 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 4 |
| Pandolf et al. (1988) | 9/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 5% gradient; Middle‐aged group) | 10 × ~119 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 6 |
| 9/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 5% gradient; Young group) | 10 × ~113 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | ||
| Pandolf and Kamon (1974) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 50% O2peak) | 10 × 120 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 5 |
| Parsons et al. (2020) | 13/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 5 × 90 min | 32.1, 70, 3.36 | 7 |
| Patterson et al. (2004b) | 12/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 16 × 90 min | 39.8, 59, 4.32 | 5 |
| Patterson et al. (2004a) | 11/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 16 × 90 min | 40.0, 60, 4.43 | 5 |
| Patterson et al. (2014) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 16 × 90 min | 39.8, 59, 4.32 | 5 |
| Périard et al. (2020) | 13/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (four periods of 5 × 6 s sprint with 24 s passive recovery and 5 min rest between) | 5 × 60 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 8 |
| Périard et al. (2023) | 14/M, Tier 4 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 10 min then 60 min at HR corresponding to 65% O2peak) | 5 × 70 min | 35.0, 40, 2.25 | 6 |
| Périard et al. (2024) | 10/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 20% of target kJ then HR corresponding to 65% O2peak for remaining 80%, for four sessions per week) and; Intermittent exercise (20 min warm‐up, 5 × 30 s max efforts with 4 min 30 s active recovery, then 10 min cool down, for one session per week) | 15 × ~68 min | 35.5, 59, 3.51 | 6 |
| Petersen et al. (2010) | 6/M, − | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (4–6 bouts of 8 × 20 s sprints with 10 s rest and 4 min rest between sets) | 4 × ~38 min | 30.0, 61, 2.59 | 6 |
| Pethick et al. (2019) | 13/M, 1/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Euhydration group) | 5 × 90 min | 34.8, 55, 3.04 | 6 |
| 9/M, 1/F, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Dehydration group) | 5 × 90 min | 34.8, 55, 3.04 | ||
| Philp et al. (2017) | 6/M, Tier 3 | Cycling; Controlled HR (5 min warm‐up followed by 45 min at PO corresponding to 70% HR reserve) | 5 × 50 min | 35.0, 56, 3.15 | 6 |
| Philp et al. (2022) | 4/M, 1/F, Tier 3 | Rowing or Cycling; Constant workrate (PO corresponding to 45%–55% PPO) | 10 × 60 min | 34.0, 55, 2.93 | 5 |
| Pichan et al. (1985) | 12/−, − | –; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min exercise periods of 1.675 kJ·h−1, with 10 min rest between) | 8 × 110 min | 45.0, 30, 2.87 | 5 |
| Piil et al. (2019) | 13/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 60% O2peak) | 28 × 60 min | 39.4, 27, 1.90 | 5 |
| Poh et al. (2012) | 11/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 5% gradient) | 10 × 90 min | 33.0, 40, 2.01 | 6 |
| Poirier et al. (2016) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 14 × 90 min | 40.0, 20, 1.48 | 5 |
| Poirier et al. (2015) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 14 × 90 min | 40.0, 20, 1.48 | 5 |
| Pryor et al. (2019) | 9/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill running and/or Cycling; Intermittent exercise (four intervals sessions at 60%–80% O2peak with 5 min rest between bouts) and controlled hyperthermia (six sessions with target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 126 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 7 |
| Pryor et al. (2021) | 24/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill running and/or Cycling; Intermittent exercise (one interval session with 1–4 min periods of walking, running at 60% and 80% O2peak at 1% gradient, with 5 min rest periods) and controlled hyperthermia (three sessions with target T core: 38.5°C–38.9°C) | 4 × ~98 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 7 |
| Pryor et al. (2020) | 12/M, − | Treadmill running and/or Cycling; Intermittent exercise (one interval session with 1–4 min periods of walking, running at 60% and 80% O2peak at 1% gradient, with 5 min rest periods) and controlled hyperthermia (three sessions with target T core: 38.5°C–38.9°C) | 4 × ~98 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 7 |
| Racinais et al. (2021) | 14/M, Tier 4 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 10 min then 60 min at HR corresponding to 65% O2peak) | 5 × 70 min | 35.0, 40, 2.25 | 7 |
| Racinais et al. (2024) | 10/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 20% of target kJ then HR corresponding to 65% O2peak for remaining 80%, for four sessions per week) and Intermittent exercise (20 min warm‐up, 5 × 30 s max efforts with 4 min 30 s active recovery, then 10 min cool down, for one session per week) | 15 × 68 min | 35.5, 59, 3.51 | 6 |
| Radakovic et al. (2007) | 40/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.5 km·h−1) | 10 × 150 min | 35.0, 40, 2.58 | 7 |
| Ravanelli et al. (2018) | 6/M, 2/F, Tier 0 | Treadmill walking; Controlled HR (Speed associated with 70% HRmax, 3%–5% gradient) | 8 × 90 min | 38.0, 65, 4.31 | 6 |
| Ravanelli et al. (2019) | 6/M, 2/F, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Controlled HR (Speed associated with 70% HRmax, 3%–5% gradient) | 6 × 90 min | 38.0, 65, 4.31 | 6 |
| Reeve et al. (2019) | 13/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (6 min warm‐up at 50% PPO followed by 12 × 1 min at 100% PPO with 1 min of unloaded cycling) | 5 × 40 min | 35.0, 50, 2.81 | 7 |
| Regan et al. (1996) | 7/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core increase: 1°C) | 10 × 60 min | 38.2, 40, 2.66 | 6 |
| Relf et al. (2020) | 15/M, 4/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C or target T core increase: 1.5°C) | 5 × 120 min | 35.0, 50, 2.81 | 5 |
| Rendell et al. (2017) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 8 × 90 min | 40.0, 50, 3.69 | 7 |
| Rivas et al. (2017) | 7 M, 5/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core increase: 1.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 42.0, 28, 2.30 | 7 |
| Rønnestad et al. (2022) | 13/M, Tier 4 | Cycling; Constant workrate (45% of PO at 4 mmol·L−1 blood lactate, with daily workload increased by 25 W if session RPE < 11 or reduced by 20 W in > 15) | 25 × 50 min | 35.0, 62, 3.46 | 7 |
| Rønnestad, Hamarsland, et al. (2021) | 11/M, Tier 4 | Cycling; Constant workrate (5 min warm‐up followed by 50 min at 45% of PO at 4 mmol·L−1 blood lactate, with daily workload increased by 25 W if session RPE ≤ 11) | 24 × 55 min | 38.0, 65, 4.31 | 8 |
| Roussey et al. (2021) | 9/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (two periods 10 × 20 s efforts at RPE 19 with 40 s active rest at RPE 9; High‐intensity group) | 5 × ~54 min | 39.0, 40, 2.80 | 7 |
| 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (Intervals of 33%, 49%, and 64% of PPO: Low‐intensity group) | 5 × 70 min | 39.0, 40, 2.80 | ||
| Rowell et al. (1967) | 7/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 0%–5% gradient) | 11.5 × ~73 min | 48.4, 16, 1.82 | 4 |
| Saillant et al. (2022) | 13/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5 km·h−1, 2% gradient) | 8 × 120 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 6 |
| Salgado et al. (2020) | 13/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5 km·h−1, 2% gradient) | 8 × 120 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 6 |
| Sargent 2nd et al. (1965) | 4/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 0% gradient) | 10 × 120 min | 40.0, 49, 4.69 | 3 |
| Sawka et al. (1985) | 13/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 40%–50% O2peak, 5.5 km·h−1, 2%–6% gradient) | 9 × 120 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 5 |
| Schleh et al. (2018) | 13/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 50% O2peak; Euhydration group) | 3 × 90 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 7 |
| 13/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 50% O2peak; Dehydration group) | 3 × 90 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | ||
| Schmit et al. (2018) | 10/M, Tier 2 | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (lowest intensity sessions of individual training week, for example, ~11 km·h−1; Low‐intensity group) | 10 × 45 min | 30.0, 50, 2.12 | 7 |
| 9/M, Tier 2 | Treadmill running; Intermittent exercise (highest intensity sessions of individual training week, for example, 8 × 400 m at 19 km·h−1; High‐intensity group) | 10 × 45 min | 30.0, 50, 2.12 | ||
| Sekiguchi et al. (2021) | 28/M, − | Treadmill running; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C–39.75°C) | 5 × ~82 min | 38.7, 51, 3.53 | 6 |
| Senay et al. (1976) | 4/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 40%–50% O2peak) | 10 × 240 min | 45.0, 41, 3.93 | 6 |
| Senay and Kok (1977) | 5/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (30% O2peak) | 8 × 240 min | 33.8, 91, 4.79 | 5 |
| Senay Jr (1978) | 6/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (30% O2peak) | 8 × 240 min | 33.8, 93, 26.62 | 4 |
| Shapiro et al. (1981) | 8/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4.8 km·h−1, 0% gradient) | 10 × 100 min | 40.0, 30, 2.21 | 6 |
| Shapiro et al. (1980) | 10/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4.8 km·h−1, 0% gradient) | 6 × 100 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 6 |
| 9/F, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4.8 km·h−1, 0% gradient) | 6 × 100 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | ||
| Shaw et al. (2022) | 12/M, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 4 × 90 min | 40.0, 60, 4.43 | 5 |
| Shvartz et al. (1973) | 6/M, Tier 0 | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (15 steps·min−1) | 6 × ~73 min | 39.8, 49, 3.58 | 6 |
| Shvartz et al. (1977) | 7/M, Tier 1 | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (41 W; Trained group) | 8 × 180 min | 39.4, 52, 3.71 | 5 |
| 7/M, Tier 1 | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (41 W; Untrained group) | 8 × 180 min | 39.4, 52, 3.71 | ||
| 7/M, Tier 1 | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (41 W; Unfit group) | 8 × 180 min | 39.4, 52, 3.71 | ||
| Shvartz et al. (1979) | 5/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 8 × 102 min | 39.8, 49, 3.58 | 5 |
| Shvartz et al. (1975) | 6/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (35 W) | 8 × 240 min | 33.9, 89, 4.71 | 6 |
| Smith and Havenith (2019) | 6/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core increase: 1.4°C) | 6 × 90 min | 45.0, 20, 1.92 | 6 |
| Sotiridis et al. (2019) | 12/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 10 × 90 min | 35.0, 57, 3.17 | 7 |
| Stearns et al. (2013) | 10/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.6 km·h−1, 5% gradient) | 10 × 90 min | 33.0, 40, 2.01 | 5 |
| Strydom et al. (1976) | 20/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (35 W) | 10 × 240 min | 33.9, 89, 4.71 | 6 |
| Sumi et al. (2022) | 8/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 50% O2peak) | 8 × 60 min | 30.5, 25, 1.09 | 7 |
| Sumi et al. (2023) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 50% O2peak) | 8 × 60 min | 35.0, 50, 2.81 | 7 |
| Sunderland et al. (2008) | 6/F, − | Running; Intermittent exercise (Loughborough intermittent shuttle test) | 4 × ~38 min | 30.0, 24, 1.02 | 6 |
| Takamata et al. (1999) | 6/M, − | Cycling; Controlled HR (four periods of 20 min at HR corresponding to 40% O2peak with 10 min rest between) | 6 × 80 min | 36.0, 40, 2.38 | 6 |
| Takeno et al. (2001) | 5/M, − | Cycling; Controlled HR (two periods of 30 min separated by 10 min, starting at PO associated with 60% O2peak for 5 min then adjusted to maintain ~140 beats·min−1) | 10 × 70 min | 30.0, 50, 3.70 | 6 |
| Tamm et al. (2015) | 20/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at 55% O2peak on days 1–5 and 60% O2peak on days 6–10, with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 100 min | 42.0, 18, 1.48 | 6 |
| Tebeck et al. (2020) | 11/M, Tier 3 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Hot‐dry HA group) | 5 × ~96 min | 44.5, 18, 1.63 | 7 |
| 11/M, Tier 3 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C; Warm‐humid HA group) | 5 × ~96 min | 32.3, 82, 3.98 | ||
| Travers, González‐Alonso, et al. (2020) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 15 min then 75 min at HR corresponding to 65% O2peak) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 5 |
| Travers et al. (2021) | 7/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 15 min then 75 min at HR corresponding to 65% O2peak; Euhydration group) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 7 |
| 7/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 15 min then 75 min at HR corresponding to 65% O2peak; Dehydration group) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | ||
| Travers, Nichols, et al. (2020) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 15 min then 75 min at HR corresponding to 65% O2peak; Euhydration group) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 6 |
| 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled HR (PO corresponding to 65% O2peak for 15 min then 75 min at HR corresponding to 65% O2peak; Dehydration group) | 10 × 90 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | ||
| Vesić et al. (2013) | 10/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (5.5 km·h−1) | 10 × 180 min | 35.0, 40, 2.25 | 6 |
| Waldock et al. (2021) | 8/M, 3/F, − | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 5 × ~109 min | 35.0, 50, 2.81 | 7 |
| Waldron et al. (2019) | 12/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 10 × 60 min | 38.0, 30, 1.99 | 7 |
| Waldron et al. (2020) | 10/M, Tier 1 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 55% O2peak) | 5 × 60 min | 36.0, 40, 2.38 | 8 |
| Watkins et al. (2008) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 75% O2peak) | 7 × 30 min | 39.5, 27, 1.94 | 6 |
| Wallett et al. (2022) | 13/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (four periods of 5 × 6 s sprint with 24 s passive recovery and 5 min rest between) | 5 × 60 min | 40.0, 40, 2.95 | 7 |
| Weller et al. (2007) | 8/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking and running; Constant workrate and controlled hyperthermia (60 min at 45% O2peak followed by 10 min rest then 40 min at target T core: 38.5°C; HA group) | 10 × 110 min | 46.1, 17.9, 1.81 | 6 |
| 8/M, Tier 1 | Treadmill walking and running; Constant workrate and controlled hyperthermia (60 min at 45% O2peak then 40 min at target T core: 38.5°C; Re‐acclimation group) | 7 × 110 min | 46.1, 18, 1.81 | ||
| White et al. (2015) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at PO associated with 55% of O2peak, with 10 min rest between) | 10 × 110 min | 40.0, 20, 1.48 | 7 |
| Williams et al. (1968) | 20/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (12 steps·min−1) | 12 × 240 min | 33.9, 89, 4.71 | 3 |
| 20/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (12 steps·min−1) | 12 × 240 min | 35.6, 89, 5.17 | ||
| 20/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (12 steps·min−1) | 12 × 240 min | 37.2, 89, 5.65 | ||
| Williams and Heyns (1969) | 20/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (12 steps·min−1) | 12 × 240 min | 33.9, 89, 4.71 | 5 |
| 21/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (12 steps·min−1) | 12 × 240 min | 35.5, 87, 5.20 | ||
| Willmott et al. (2016) | 7/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak; Single daily group) | 4 × 45 min | 35.2, 60, 3.41 | 6 |
| 7/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak; Twice‐daily group) | 4 × 45 min | 35.4, 61, 3.51 | ||
| Willmott et al. (2017) | 8/M, Tier 2 | Cycling; Controlled hyperthermia (target T core: 38.5°C) | 4 × 60 min | 44.6, 30, 2.82 | 6 |
| Wingfield et al. (2016) | 10/M, − | Cycling; Intermittent exercise (3 min intervals at 40% and 70% PPO; High‐intensity group) | 5 × 30 min | 32.0, 60, 2.85 | 5 |
| 10/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (40% of PPO; Low‐intensity group) | 5 × 90 min | 32.0, 60, 2.85 | ||
| Wood and Bass (1960) | 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4 × 30 min periods daily of walking at 5.6 km·h−1, 5% gradient; Study 1) | 8 × 120 min | 48.9, 18, 2.10 | 5 |
| 4/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (4 × 30 min periods daily of walking at 5.6 km·h−1, 5% gradient; Study 2) | 5 × 120 min | 48.9, 18, 2.10 | ||
| Wyndham et al. (1968) | 6/M, − | Bench stepping; Constant workrate (12 steps·min−1) | 17 × 240 min | 33.9, 95, 5.03 | 6 |
| Wyndham et al. (1976) | 4/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 40%–50% O2peak) | 10 × 240 min | 45.0, 42, 4.02 | 3 |
| Yamada et al. (2007) | 10/M, − | Treadmill walking or running; Constant workrate (2 × 50 min periods at 56% O2peak, with 15 min rest between) | 10 × ~96 min | 42.5, 28, 2.35 | 7 |
| Yamazaki (2008) | 8/M, Tier 0 | Cycling; Constant workrate (4 × 20 min periods at PO associated with 50% O2peak, with 10 min rest between) | 6 × 110 min | 36.0, 50, 2.97 | 6 |
| Yamazaki and Hamasaki (2003) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (4 × 20 min periods at PO associated with 50% O2peak, with 10 min rest between) | 6 × 110 min | 36.0, 50, 4.44 | 6 |
| Young et al. (1985) | 13/M, − | Treadmill walking; Constant workrate (Speed associated with 40%–50% O2peak) | 9 × 120 min | 49.0, 20, 2.35 | 6 |
| Zappe et al. (1996) | 6/M, − | Cycling; Constant workrate (PO associated with 50% O2peak) | 4 × 90 min | 30.0, 61, 2.59 | 6 |
| Zhang and Zhu (2021) | 30/M, − | Treadmill running; Constant workrate (5 km·h−1) | 10 × 90 min | 38.0, 40, 2.65 | 6 |
| Zimmermann et al. (2018) | 8/M, − | Cycling; Controlled HR (HR corresponding to 50% O2peak) | 10 × 60 min | 34.9, 49, 2.73 | 7 |
Abbreviations: APMHR, age predicted maximum heart rate; F, female; HA, heat acclimation; H prod, metabolic heat production; HR, heart rate; HRmax, maximum heart rate; M, male; P a, partial pressure of water vapor in air; PO, power output; PPO, peak power output; RH, relative humidity; RPE, rate of perceived exertion; T a, ambient temperature; T core, core temperature; O2peak, peak oxygen uptake.
Exercise capacity and performance tests were only included if conducted in T a ≥ 30°C. To be eligible for inclusion as a valid measure of constant workrate exercise capacity, the test could not have a predetermined fixed duration (e.g., 90 min), but was terminated due to volitional fatigue, or laboratory cutoff points (e.g., internal T core > 40°C or 95% HRmax). Incremental O2peak tests in the heat were included in the incremental exercise capacity model if preceded by a period of warming (e.g., constant work exercise in the heat ≥ 20 min). Performance tests (i.e., self‐paced time trials) were converted to percent change in time to allow for comparing between tests by equating a 1% change in power output to a 1% change in running speed or time, and a 0.4% change in time during cycling time trials (Hopkins 2004). For outcome variables assessed during (i.e., exercise metabolic rate, LSR and sweat [Na+]) or at the end (i.e., HR, T core and T sk) of exercise, data were only extracted if external workrate was the same for the pre‐ and post‐heat response tests. This was done to avoid potential differences in outcome variable responses between pre‐ and post‐testing being attributable to differences in workrate. Performance tests where workrate differed (e.g., time trials) were included for the assessment of WBSR if no data were reported for a heat response test. When WBSR was reported as sweat loss, it was converted to a rate (mL·h−1) using the information provided in the paper. If BV, PV, or RCV was reported in absolute terms (i.e., mL), it was converted to a percentage change from baseline. Where multiple heat response tests were reported throughout an intervention (e.g., mid‐ and post‐intervention), only the first and final heat response test were used. If no defined heat response test was completed pre‐ and post‐intervention and a constant workrate approach to HA was used, the first and last day were compared, with the final day not counting as an exposure day (e.g., 10‐day HA regimen = 9 exposures). If papers had pre‐to‐post heat response tests in multiple environments, the environment most akin to the HA conditions was used. Means and standard deviations (SD) or standard errors (SE) for all outcome variables were extracted. When median and interquartile ranges were reported, data were converted to mean and SD and checked for normality (Shi et al. 2023). Where only confidence intervals were reported, these were converted to SD/SE based on guidelines from the Cochrane Handbook (Higgins et al. 2008). Similarly, if the mean change from baseline was not available, it was calculated from pre‐to‐post test data (Higgins et al. 2008).
2.4. Risk of Bias Assessment
The risk of bias for all included studies was independently assessed by two reviewers (PM, HB, TT, MK, and/or WJ) using a modified version of the McMaster critical review form for quantitative studies (Chalmers et al. 2014; Law et al. 1998). The risk of bias for all studies was assessed using the low‐to‐high risk scale, with a scoring system of up to eight points used, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of bias. This critical appraisal tool (Material S1) incorporates six categories from the McMaster tool and includes an additional category that examines the process of controlling and randomization used. Percentage scores for risk of bias are presented as a percentage risk for a low risk of bias; therefore, high scores denote a low risk.
2.5. Data Analysis
To assess the relationship between changes in outcome variables and HA protocol characteristics, individual multilevel meta‐regression models were applied using “brms” package (Bürkner 2017) via R software (R Core Team 2009) in RStudio (version 4.2.1). A meta‐regression model was conducted for each outcome variable, fitted with the given outcome variable as the response variable, with T a (in °C), P a (in kPa), total number of exposures (in days), duration per exposure (in min), and HA approach (constant workrate, controlled hyperthermia, controlled HR or intermittent exercise) as the predictors. For exercise metabolic rate, RCV, Hbmass, LSR, sweat [Na+], and exercise capacity models, HA approach was not entered as a predictor variable due to a lack of papers/observations and difference in approaches used. Smooth terms (e.g., splines) were initially included in the models but these did not converge, likely due to a combination of data limitations and model complexity. As such, we examined the linear relationship between each outcome variable and an additional day of exposure, a 15‐min increase in duration per exposure, and a 5°C and 1 kPa increase in T a and P a during HA, respectively. The specified changes in predictor variables were chosen based on the range each predictor can be practically manipulated during HA. The response variables were defined as the mean difference and SE observed between pre‐ and post‐observations. Exposure days, exposure duration, T a and P a were entered as continuous variables, while HA approach was entered as a categorical variable. To assess the convergence of all models, Rhat statistics, the effective sample size, along with visual inspection of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (Vehtari et al. 2021) were used. Figures were developed using the “ggplot2” package (Wickham 2016). Additional analyses were conducted to determine the linear relationship between aerobic fitness (i.e., O2peak) and initial baseline value on changes in resting HR and T core. A meta‐regression model was fitted with resting HR and T core as the response variable, and either initial O2peak or baseline values as the predictor variable. These models were conducted separately due to the potential collinearity between variables. We examined the influence of a 15 beats·min−1 and a 0.5°C higher baseline for resting HR and resting T core, alongside a 15 mL·kg−1·min−1 lower O2peak, respectively.
Descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± SD, with data from models presented as posterior means with 90% credible intervals (CrI). In addition, 90% prediction intervals (PrI) were used in figures to estimate where data from future studies may fall (Material S2, Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; Borg et al. 2023). The probability of direction (Pd) was defined as the proportion of posterior draws on either side of zero and is presented as a percentage (%). Priors for all outcome variables were intended to be weakly informative and were set as normally distributed, with the mean at zero and the SD as: resting T core (0.4°C), end‐exercise T core and T sk (1°C), resting (10 beats·min−1) and end‐exercise HR (40 beats·min−1), PV (15%), BV (15%), RCV (5%), Hbmass (50 g), exercise metabolic rate (200 mL·min−1), WBSR (400 mL·h−1), upper back and forearm LSR (0.4 mg·cm−2·min−1), sweat [Na+] (50 mmol·L−1), incremental exercise test (30%), time to exhaustion test (30%), and self‐paced time‐trial performance (10%). Scaled priors were applied to all continuous predictor variables (Gelman 2006).
FIGURE 2.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in resting heart rate (HR) across days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (T a: 38.5°C, P a: 2.92 kPa, 84 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI. (B) Estimated change in resting HR based on the heat acclimation approach with 90% CrI (box) and 90% PrI (error bars). Estimates are based on the global means of the predictor variables for a mean duration of 8.1 days.
FIGURE 3.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in end‐exercise heart rate (HR) across days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (T a: 40.0°C, P a: 2.66 kPa, 96 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI. (B) Estimated change in end‐exercise HR based on the heat acclimation approach with 90% CrI (box) and 90% PrI (error bars). Estimates are based on the global means of the predictor variables for a mean duration of 8.0 days.
FIGURE 4.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in plasma volume (PV) across days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (T a: 38.5°C, P a: 2.90 kPa, 86 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI. (B) Estimated change in PV based on the heat acclimation approach with 90% CrI (box) and 90% PrI (error bars). Estimates are based on the global means of the predictor variables for a mean duration of 8.6 days.
FIGURE 5.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in resting core temperature (T core) across days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (T a: 38.0°C, P a: 2.94 kPa, 87 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI. (B) Estimated change in resting T core based on the heat acclimation approach with 90% CrI (box) and 90% PrI (error bars). Estimates are based on the global means of the predictor variables for a mean duration of 7.9 days.
FIGURE 6.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in end‐exercise core temperature (T core) across days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (T a: 39.7°C, P a: 2.69 kPa, 95 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI. (B) Estimated change in end‐exercise T core based on the heat acclimation approach with 90% CrI (box) and 90% PrI (error bars). Estimates are based on the global means of the predictor variables for a mean duration of 8.1 days.
FIGURE 7.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in end‐exercise mean skin temperature (T sk) across days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (T a: 39.8°C, P a: 2.76 kPa, 90 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI. (B) Estimated change in end‐exercise T sk based on the heat acclimation approach with 90% CrI (box) and 90% PrI (error bars). Estimates are based on the global means of the predictor variables for a mean duration of 7.6 days.
FIGURE 8.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in whole‐body sweat rate (WBSR) across days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (T a: 39.1°C, P a: 2.77 kPa, 90 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI. (B) Estimated change in WBSR based on the heat acclimation approach with 90% CrI (box) and 90% PrI (error bars). Estimates are based on the global means of the predictor variables for a mean duration of 8.2 days.
FIGURE 9.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in time to exhaustion, and (B) incremental exercise over days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (A: T a: 38.5°C, P a: 2.13 kPa, 78 min per exposure; B: T a: 34.9°C, P a: 3.49 kPa; and 88 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI.
FIGURE 10.

(A) Estimated change (Δ) in time trial performance across days of exposure based on the global means of the predictor variables (T a: 35.8°C, P a: 2.95 kPa, 69 min per exposure). The inner dark gray band represents the 90% CrI and the outer light gray band denotes the 90% PrI. (B) Estimated change in time trial performance based on the heat acclimation approach with 90% CrI (box) and 90% PrI (error bars). Estimates are based on the global means of the predictor variables for a mean duration of 7.6 days.
3. Results
The processes used to assess the 232 papers included in this meta‐analysis are shown in Figure 1. Papers were most commonly excluded due to participants being acclimated or acclimatized pre‐intervention, absence of relevant outcomes for the current analyses, review papers, wrong study design, using passive HA in isolation or alongside exercise‐HA, or alternating environmental conditions. Of the 232 papers (Table 1), data from a total of 2587 participants were extracted, of which a minimum of 239 participants were replicated in more than one paper. Of the total participant sample, 229 were female (8.9%), with four papers (n = 56) not directly specifying sex (Lind and Bass 1963; Best et al. 2014; Givoni and Goldman 1973; Pichan et al. 1985). The weighted means (±SD; weighting based on individual study sample size) for participant characteristics were as follows: age (25 ± 5 years), height (1.75 ± 0.06 m), body mass (73.8 ± 7.6 kg), and O2max (52.6 ± 7.7 mL·kg−1·min−1). The most common exercise‐based HA approach was constant workrate (139 papers), followed by controlled hyperthermia (46 papers), intermittent exercise (19 papers), controlled HR (13 papers), self‐paced exercise (1 papers), a combination of intermittent and controlled hyperthermia (4 papers), constant workrate and intermittent exercise (2 papers), controlled HR and intermittent exercise (2 papers), constant workrate and controlled hyperthermia (1 paper), and constant workrate and controlled HR (1 paper), with four studies comparing constant workrate HA to controlled hyperthermia (2 papers) or intermittent exercise (2 papers). Of the 232 papers, SD, SE, or confidence intervals were not provided for 21 (Lind and Bass 1963; Givoni and Goldman 1973; Avellini, Shapiro, et al. 1980; Bass and Jacobson 1965; Borg et al. 2020; Garden et al. 1966; Hertig and Sargent 2nd 1963; Horvath and Shelley 1946; O'Toole et al. 1983; Pandolf and Kamon 1974; Radakovic et al. 2007; Sargent 2nd et al. 1965; Shvartz et al. 1975; Vesić et al. 2013; Williams et al. 1968; Williams and Heyns 1969; Buono et al. 2018; Senay and Kok 1977; Frye and Kamon 1983; Joy et al. 1964; Allan 1965), with data from Borg et al. (2020) captured in a companion paper (Osborne et al. 2021). Thus, a total of 211 papers had at least one outcome variable included in these meta‐analyses (Material S3).
FIGURE 1.

PRISMA flow diagram outlining the identification, screening, and inclusion of papers in this review.
3.1. Model Performance
The models for resting and end‐exercise HR, PV, resting and end‐exercise T core, end‐exercise T sk, WBSR and time trial performance with exposure days, T a, P a, exposure duration and HA approach as predictors, along with the models for exercise metabolic rate, BV, RCV, Hbmass, upper back and forearm LSR, sweat [Na+], time to exhaustion and incremental exercise with exposure days, T a, P a, and exposure duration as predictors, all successfully converged (Rhat = 1.0). The additional models for resting T core and HR with pre‐HA (i.e., baseline) resting T core and HR, as well as O2peak as predictors also successfully converged (Rhat = 1.0).
3.2. Risk of Bias
Overall, included papers provided a low certainty of risk for an appropriate study purpose (96%) and conclusion (94%), reliable and valid outcome measures (96%), statistical analysis (88%), and implementation of a thoroughly detailed intervention (96%). In contrast, studies commonly scored a high certainty for risk of bias due to the lack of control groups (60%), randomization of participants (19%), and not justifying sample size (20%). A large number of papers included are at a high risk of bias due to the absence of a control group, which is in line with previous meta‐analyses (Tyler et al. 2016, 2024; Chalmers et al. 2014). Failing to justify sample size is a common occurrence for studies scoring a high risk of bias. However, due to factors such as population limitations (e.g., elite athletes), participant availability (e.g., team sports), and protocol time frame (i.e., weeks), HA studies are often limited in how many participants they include.
3.2.1. Cardiovascular Responses
3.2.1.1. Resting Heart Rate
The resting HR model was based on 58 observations (n = 556) across 47 papers, with mean (SD) protocol characteristics of: 38.5°C ± 3.2°C, 2.92 ± 0.73 kPa, 8.1 ± 3.2 days, and 84 ± 31 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in resting HR of −5.3 beats·min−1 (−7.2, −3.0; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of −0.3 beats·min−1 (−0.6, 0.0; Pd = 96%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 2A). The estimated change in resting HR was −0.1 beats·min−1 (−0.6, 0.3; Pd = 67%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, 0.3 beats·min−1 (−1.2, 1.8; Pd = 64%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 0.1 beats·min−1 (−1.2, 1.4; Pd = 54%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in resting HR was −5.0 beats·min−1 (−6.5, −3.6; Pd > 99%; n = 203) for constant workrate HA, −8.0 beats·min−1 (−9.6, −6.3; Pd > 99%; n = 199) for controlled hyperthermia HA, −4.1 beats·min−1 (−6.3, −1.6; Pd > 99%; n = 46) for controlled HR HA, and −5.2 beats·min−1 (−7.9, −2.3; Pd > 99%; n = 54) for intermittent exercise‐HA (Figure 2B).
The change in resting HR model accounting for pre‐HA resting HR (global mean: 72 ± 10 beats·min−1) was based on 56 observations (n = 534) across 45 papers. For a 15 beats·min−1 higher pre‐HA resting HR, a further change of −2.5 beats·min−1 (−3.9, −1.1; Pd > 99%) was estimated. The change in resting HR model accounting for pre‐HA O2peak (global mean: 51 ± 6 mL·kg−1·min−1) was based on 52 observations (n = 503) across 41 papers. For a 15 mL·kg−1·min−1 lower pre‐HA O2peak, a further change of −0.6 beats·min−1 (−5.0, 3.8; Pd = 59%) was estimated.
3.2.1.2. End‐Exercise Heart Rate
The end‐exercise HR model was based on 118 observations (n = 1089) across 101 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 40.0°C ± 4.9°C, 2.66 ± 0.84 kPa, 8.0 ± 2.5 days, and 96 ± 35 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in end‐exercise HR of −16.5 beats·min−1 (−18.7, −14.0; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of 0.0 beats·min−1 (−0.4, 0.4; Pd = 52%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 3A). The estimated change in end‐exercise HR was −1.1 beats·min−1 (−1.6, −0.5; Pd > 99%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −1.8 beats·min−1 (−3.0, −0.7; Pd = 99%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 0.7 beats·min−1 (−0.8, 2.2; Pd = 79%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in end‐exercise HR was −16.8 beats·min−1 (−18.1, −15.7; Pd > 99%; n = 755) for constant workrate HA, −16.5 beats·min−1 (−18.7, −14.1; Pd > 99%; n = 174) for controlled hyperthermia HA, −15.2 beats·min−1 (−17.7, −10.2; Pd > 99%; n = 39) for controlled HR HA, and −17.3 beats·min−1 (−21.5, −14.7; Pd > 99%; n = 49) for intermittent exercise‐HA (Figure 3B).
3.2.1.3. Exercise Metabolic Rate
The exercise metabolic rate model was based on 26 observations (n = 244) across 20 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 40.0°C ± 4.1°C, 2.90 ± 0.86 kPa, 7.5 ± 2.0 days, and 90 ± 42 min per exposure. Using these global means, a change in exercise metabolic rate of −87 mL·min−1 (−126, −49; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of 5 mL·min−1 (−8, 17; Pd = 73%) per additional day of exposure. The estimated change in exercise metabolic rate was −3 mL·min−1 (−17, 12; Pd = 62%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −28 mL·min−1 (−64, 11; Pd = 89%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and –20 mL·min−1 (−52, 15; Pd = 83%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a.
3.2.2. Hematological Responses
3.2.2.1. Blood Volume
The BV model was based on 31 observations (n = 258) across 26 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 38.4°C ± 3.6°C, 2.96 ± 0.71 kPa, 10.1 ± 5.7 days, and 80 ± 22 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in BV of 2.9% (0.9, 4.7; Pd = 98%) was estimated, with a change of 0.0% (−0.2, 0.2; Pd = 60%) per additional day of exposure. The estimated change in BV was 0.7% (−0.2, 1.5; Pd = 91%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −0.8% (−2.6, 1.0; Pd = 77%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and −0.1% (−1.6, 1.5; Pd = 53%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in BV was 3.7% (2.2, 5.5; Pd > 99%; n = 111) for constant workrate HA, 3.4% (1.5, 5.4; Pd > 99%; n = 50) for controlled hyperthermia HA, 2.7% (0.6, 4.3; Pd = 98%; n = 71) for controlled HR HA, and 2.6% (−0.8, 4.8; Pd = 92%; n = 16) for intermittent exercise‐HA.
3.2.2.2. Plasma Volume
The PV model was based on 94 observations (n = 859) across 82 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 38.5°C ± 4.2°C, 2.90 ± 0.88 kPa, 8.6 ± 4.5 days, and 86 ± 37 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in PV of 5.6% (3.8, 7.0; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of −0.1% (−0.2, 0.1; Pd = 77%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 4A). The estimated change in PV was 0.4% (0.1, 0.7; Pd = 98%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, 0.1% (−0.8, 1.0; Pd = 57%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and −0.3% (−1.2, 0.7; Pd = 68%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in PV was 6.5% (5.6, 7.5; Pd > 99%; n = 430) for constant workrate HA, 6.4% (5.2, 7.7; Pd > 99%; n = 263) for controlled hyperthermia HA, 5.6% (3.5, 7.0; Pd > 99%; n = 63) for controlled HR HA, and 5.2% (2.5, 6.9; Pd > 99%; n = 63) for intermittent exercise‐HA (Figure 4B).
3.2.2.3. Red Cell Volume
The RCV model was based on 23 observations (n = 201) across 19 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 38.8°C ± 3.9°C, 3.13 ± 0.86 kPa, 11.5 ± 6.8 days, and 82 ± 21 min per exposure. Using these global means, a change in RCV of 1.3% (0.4, 2.2; Pd = 99%) was estimated, with a change of 0.0% (0.0, 0.2; Pd = 85%) per additional day of exposure. The estimated change in RCV was 0.0% (−0.4, 0.5; Pd = 53%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −0.5% (−1.6, 0.6; Pd = 77%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 0.7% (−0.2, 1.6; Pd = 91%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a.
3.2.2.4. Hemoglobin Mass
The Hbmass model was based on 13 observations (n = 139) across 12 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 37.0° ± 4.6°C, 2.92 ± 0.76 kPa, 12.5 ± 8.1 days, and 71 ± 18 min per exposure. Using these global means, a change in Hbmass of −3.6 g (−12.1, 6.0; Pd = 75%) was estimated, with a change of 1.9 g (0.6, 3.2; Pd = 99%) per additional day of exposure. The estimated change in Hbmass was −0.9 (−5.4, 3.8; Pd = 62%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −1.7 g (−11.1, 7.4; Pd = 62%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 2.7 g (−7.0, 12.9; Pd = 68%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a.
3.2.3. Thermal Responses
3.2.3.1. Resting Core Temperature
The resting T core model was based on 103 observations (n = 1014) across 82 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 38.0°C ± 3.8°C, 2.94 ± 0.80 kPa, 7.9 ± 2.8 days, and 87 ± 36 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in resting T core of −0.19°C (−0.23, −0.14; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of −0.01°C (−0.02, 0.00; Pd = 99%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 5A). The estimated change in resting T core was −0.01°C (−0.02, 0.01; Pd = 82%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −0.01°C (−0.05, 0.03; Pd = 67%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and −0.01°C (−0.05, 0.02; Pd = 71%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in resting T core was −0.21°C (−0.25, −0.18; Pd > 99%; n = 426) for constant workrate HA, −0.20°C (−0.23, −0.16; Pd > 99%; n = 383) for controlled hyperthermia HA, −0.18°C (−0.23, −0.09; Pd > 99%; n = 54) for controlled HR HA, and −0.17°C (−0.22, −0.09; Pd > 99%; n = 86) for intermittent exercise‐HA (Figure 5B).
The change in resting T core model accounting for pre‐HA resting T core (global mean: 37.2°C ± 0.2°C) was based on 103 observations (n = 1014) across 82 papers. For a 0.5°C higher pre‐HA resting T core, a further change of −0.08°C (−0.13, −0.02; Pd = 99%) was estimated. The change in resting T core model accounting for pre‐HA O2peak (global mean: 53 ± 7 mL·kg−1·min−1) was based on 93 observations (n = 913) across 73 papers. For a 15 mL·kg−1·min−1 lower pre‐HA O2peak, a further change of −0.01°C (−0.07, 0.05; Pd = 61%) was estimated.
3.2.3.2. End‐Exercise Core Temperature
The end‐exercise T core model was based on 136 observations (n = 1275) across 115 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 39.7°C ± 4.9°C, 2.69 ± 0.88 kPa, 8.1 ± 2.5 days, and 95 ± 39 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in end‐exercise T core of −0.43°C (−0.48, −0.36; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of −0.01°C (−0.02, 0.00; Pd = 93%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 6A). The estimated change in end‐exercise T core was −0.04°C (−0.05, −0.03; Pd > 99%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −0.05°C (−0.09, −0.02; Pd > 99%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 0.03°C (−0.01, 0.07; Pd = 88%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in end‐exercise T core was −0.45°C (−0.49, −0.42; Pd > 99%; n = 821) for constant workrate HA, −0.43°C (−0.48, −0.36; Pd > 99%; n = 238) for controlled hyperthermia HA, −0.41°C (−0.47, −0.30; Pd > 99%; n = 75) for controlled HR HA, and −0.44°C (−0.53, −0.37; Pd > 99%; n = 59) for intermittent exercise‐HA (Figure 6B).
3.2.3.3. End‐Exercise Skin Temperature
The end‐exercise T sk model was based on 58 observations (n = 548) across 47 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 39.8°C ± 4.9°C, 2.76 ± 0.89 kPa, 7.6 ± 2.4 days, and 90 ± 36 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in end‐exercise T sk of −0.54°C (−0.71, −0.39; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of −0.03°C (−0.05, 0.00; Pd = 96%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 7A). The estimated change in end‐exercise T sk was −0.02°C (−0.06, 0.01; Pd = 88%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −0.18°C (−0.25, −0.10; Pd > 99%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 0.06°C (−0.03, 0.14; Pd = 88%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in end‐exercise T sk based on the HA approach was −0.46°C (−0.55, −0.37; Pd > 99%; n = 296) for constant workrate HA, −0.64°C (−0.80, −0.49; Pd > 99%; n = 130) for controlled hyperthermia HA, −0.42°C (−0.58, −0.24; Pd > 99%; n = 47) for controlled HR HA, and −0.66°C (−0.90, −0.46; Pd > 99%; n = 34) for intermittent exercise‐HA (Figure 7B).
3.2.4. Sweating Responses
3.2.4.1. Whole Body Sweat Rate
The WBSR model was based on 138 observations (n = 1284) across 113 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 39.1°C ± 4.9°C, 2.77 ± 0.80 kPa, 8.2 ± 3.0 days, and 90 ± 33 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in WBSR of 163 mL·h−1 (94, 226; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of 9 mL·h−1 (1, 17; Pd = 97%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 8A). The estimated change in WBSR was −11 mL·h−1 (−23, 2; Pd = 93%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, 16 mL·h−1 (−12, 45; Pd = 82%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 37 mL·h−1 (4, 72; Pd = 97%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in WBSR based on the HA approach was 163 mL·h−1 (129, 197; Pd > 99%; n = 667) for constant workrate HA, 209 mL·h−1 (152, 270; Pd > 99%; n = 323) for controlled hyperthermia HA, 174 mL·h−1 (96, 253; Pd > 99%; n = 75) for controlled HR HA, and 49 mL·h−1 (−71, 167; Pd = 74%; n = 86) for intermittent exercise‐HA (Figure 8B).
3.2.4.2. Upper Back Local Sweat Rate
The upper back LSR model was based on 13 observations (n = 128) across 11 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 38.3°C ± 3.1°C, 3.31 ± 0.75 kPa, 7.5 ± 2.0 days, and 96 ± 10 min per exposure. Using these global means, a change in upper back LSR of 0.17 mg·cm−2·min−1 (0.06, 0.28; Pd = 99%) was estimated, with a change of 0.00 mg·cm−2·min−1 (−0.02, 0.02; Pd = 51%) per additional day of exposure. The estimated change in upper back LSR was 0.02 mg·cm−2·min−1 (−0.03, 0.07; Pd = 75%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −0.06 mg·cm−2·min−1 (−0.15, −0.03; Pd = 87%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and −0.03 mg·cm−2·min−1 (−0.13, 0.07; Pd = 71%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a.
3.2.4.3. Forearm Local Sweat Rate
The forearm LSR model was based on 15 observations (n = 129) across 12 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 37.7° ± 4.4°C, 3.19 ± 0.88 kPa, 7.5 ± 2.4 days, and 94 ± 13 min per exposure. Using these global means, a change in forearm LSR of 0.27 mg·cm−2·min−1 (0.20, 0.34; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of 0.00 mg·cm−2·min−1 (−0.02, 0.01; Pd = 57%) per additional day of exposure. The estimated change in forearm LSR was 0.00 mg·cm−2·min−1 (−0.04, 0.05; Pd = 57%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −0.05 mg·cm−2·min−1 (−0.10, 0.01; Pd = 91%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and −0.03 mg·cm−2·min−1 (−0.10, 0.04; Pd = 78%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a.
3.2.4.4. Sweat Sodium Concentration
The sweat [Na+] model was based on 16 observations (n = 132) across 14 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 38.1° ± 3.9°C, 3.11 ± 0.69 kPa, 8.1 ± 2.8 days, and 95 ± 10 min per exposure. Using these global means, a change in sweat [Na+] of −20.3 mmol·L−1 (−27.6, −13.0; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of 0.0 mmol·L−1 (−1.8, 1.8; Pd = 50%) per additional day of exposure. The estimated change in sweat [Na+] was −2.4 mmol·L−1 (−7.0, 2.3; Pd = 80%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, 3.7 mmol·L−1 (−5.2, 12.0; Pd = 77%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and −0.2 mmol·L−1 (−9.0, 8.7; Pd = 52%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a.
3.2.5. Exercise Capacity and Performance
3.2.5.1. Time to Exhaustion
The time to exhaustion test model was based on 10 observations (n = 148) across 10 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 38.5°C ± 3.7°C, 2.13 ± 1.14 kPa, 10.3 ± 6.8 days, and 78 ± 28 min per exposure. Using these global means, a change in time to exhaustion of 48.7% (34.7, 61.2; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of 1.2% (−0.5, 2.7; Pd = 89%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 9A). The estimated change in time to exhaustion was 3.4% (−1.1, 7.7; Pd = 89%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, 8.6% (−2.9, 19.5; Pd = 89%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and −5.3% (−12.3, 1.9; Pd = 89%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a.
3.2.5.2. Incremental Exercise
The incremental exercise test model was based on eight observations (n = 88) across five papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 34.9°C ± 3.1°C, 3.49 ± 0.57 kPa, 7.5 ± 2.7 days, and 88 ± 20 min per exposure. Using these global means, a change in incremental exercise test capacity of 14.2% (6.7, 23.6; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of 0.2% (−1.6, 1.9; Pd = 57%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 9B). The estimated change in incremental exercise test capacity was −2.7% (−6.1, 1.5; Pd = 87%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, 3.9% (−6.1, 13.6; Pd = 74%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 0.1% (−7.2, 7.6; Pd = 51%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a.
3.2.5.3. Time Trial Performance
The time‐trial performance model was based on 23 observations (n = 211) across 17 papers, with mean protocol characteristics of: 35.8°C ± 3.2°C, 2.95 ± 0.62 kPa, 7.6 ± 3.0 days, and 69 ± 22 min per exposure. Using these global means and based on a weighted average HA approach, a change in performance of 3.1% (1.8, 4.5; Pd > 99%) was estimated, with a change of 0.1% (−0.2, 0.4; Pd = 69%) per additional day of exposure (Figure 10A). The estimated change in time trial performance was 0.1% (−0.6, 0.8; Pd = 58%) for a 15‐min increase in exposure duration, −0.5% (−2.1, 1.0; Pd = 73%) for a 5°C increase in T a, and 0.2% (−1.1, 1.6; Pd = 61%) for a 1 kPa increase in P a. The estimated change in performance based on HA approach was 3.7% (2.5, 5.2; Pd > 99%; n = 73) for constant workrate HA, 3.0% (1.4, 4.3; Pd > 99%; n = 49) for controlled hyperthermia HA, 3.3% (1.9, 4.9; Pd > 99%; n = 32) for controlled HR HA, and 2.8% (1.3, 4.0; Pd > 99%; n = 47) for intermittent exercise‐HA (Figure 10B).
4. Discussion
The aim of this review was to quantify the adaptive response to exercise‐HA and determine the influence of protocol characteristics on adaptation kinetics. Our analyses indicated that exercise‐HA (~8 days, ~90 min per exposure, ~39.1°C, and ~2.78 kPa) lowered resting HR (5 beats·min−1), end‐exercise HR (17 beats·min−1), resting T core (0.19°C), end‐exercise T core (0.43°C), end‐exercise T sk (0.54°C), and exercise metabolic rate (87 mL·min−1) during a heat response test (92 ± 49 min; range: 15– 240 min). Exercise‐HA also expanded BV (2.9%), PV (5.6%), and RCV (1.3%), increased WBSR (163 mL·h−1), and improved time to exhaustion (49%), incremental exercise capacity (14%), and time trial performance (3%). Our analyses also indicated that the addition of one exposure day further lowered resting T core (0.01°C) and end‐exercise T sk (0.03°C), and increased Hbmass (1.9 g) and WBSR (9 mL·h−1), while increasing exposure duration by 15 min further lowered end‐exercise HR (1 beat·min−1) and end‐exercise T core (0.04°C) and expanded PV (0.4%). A 5°C higher T a during HA further lowered end‐exercise HR (2 beats·min−1), end‐exercise T core (0.05°C), and end‐exercise T sk (0.18°C), whereas a 1 kPa increase in P a increased RCV (0.7%) and enhanced WBSR (37 mL·h−1). To guide individualized HA prescription for athletes and military/occupational personnel or exercise physiology experiments, an online tool for estimating HA adaptations based on protocol characteristics is publicly available via the web site (https://www.canberra.edu.au/research/centres/uc‐rise/research/environmental‐physiology/exercise‐heat‐acclimation‐predictor).
4.1. Cardiovascular Adaptations
Our analyses revealed that exercise‐HA decreased resting (5 beats·min−1) and end‐exercise HR (17 beats·min−1), and lowered exercise metabolic rate (87 mL·min−1; Figures 2 and 3). The changes in resting and end‐exercise HR differed widely between the papers included in this review (Figures S1 and S2), ranging from a 4 beats·min−1 increase in resting HR (Aoyagi et al. 1994) to an 18 beats·min−1 reduction (Gibson, Turner, et al. 2015), and from a 1 beat·min−1 increase in end‐exercise HR (Aoyagi et al. 1994; Travers et al. 2021) to a reduction of > 30 beats·min−1 (Rowell et al. 1967; Shapiro et al. 1980; Kotze et al. 1977; Pandolf et al. 1977; Finberg and Berlyne 1977; Shvartz et al. 1977). For end‐exercise HR, increasing T a and exposure duration during HA led to further reductions of 2 and 1 beat·min−1, respectively. These novel observations highlight the intricate interaction between HA protocol characteristics and adaptation kinetics, with specific adjustments in characteristics having the potential to impact the HA phenotype.
A large portion of the reduction in HR during exercise occurs within the first week of HA (Griefahn 1997; Pandolf et al. 1988), which is supported by our findings that demonstrate no influence of an additional exposure day on end‐exercise HR (Figure 3A). It has also been suggested that constant workrate HA may result in incomplete adaptations compared to controlled hyperthermia HA (Tyler et al. 2016, 2024); however, our results indicate a similar reduction in end‐exercise HR between approaches (15–17 beats·min−1). When comparing HA approaches, the reduction in resting HR was also within 4 beats·min−1 between constant workrate (−5 beats·min−1), controlled hyperthermia (−8 beats·min−1), controlled HR (−4 beats·min−1), and intermittent exercise HA (−5 beats·min−1). A sub‐analysis revealed that an additional reduction of ~3 beats·min−1 in resting HR occurred when pre‐HA resting HR was 15 beats·min−1 higher than the global mean of 72 beats·min−1. In line with this observation, reductions of > 10 beats·min−1 have been demonstrated when pre‐HA resting HR was ≥ 75 beats·min−1 (Rendell et al. 2017; Moss et al. 2020; Magalhães et al. 2010; Lee et al. 2016), with studies having lower pre‐HA values (52–57 beats·min−1) often reporting smaller reductions (2–4 beats·min−1; Osborne et al. 2021; Travers, Nichols, et al. 2020; James et al. 2017). It was anticipated that a similar relationship would exist with a lower pre‐HA O2peak, but this was not the case. Nevertheless, these data indicate that individuals with a higher resting HR, which are typically less aerobically trained (Reimers et al. 2018), have a greater potential for adaptations.
For exercising metabolic rate, our analysis revealed a reduction of ~87 mL·min−1 from pre‐ to post‐HA, with one paper reporting an improvement in exercise economy of 181 mL·min−1 (Shvartz et al. 1977). Historically, improvements in metabolic rate have been shown to be more pronounced in unfit (181 mL·min−1; O2peak: 36 mL·kg−1·min−1) than highly fit individuals (121 mL·min−1: O2peak: 60 mL·kg−1·min−1; Shvartz et al. 1977). Several mechanistic pathways have been suggested to mediate the decrease in metabolic rate following HA, including an increase in BV allowing for a greater fraction of cardiac output to perfuse exercising muscles (Rowell 1974; Senay et al. 1976). Support for this pathway is limited, however, with reports of leg blood flow remaining similar from pre‐ to post‐HA (Nielsen et al. 1993; Kirwan et al. 1987). Others have suggested that HA lowers metabolic rate by improving muscular efficiency (Jansen et al. 1990), possibly via alterations in motor unit recruitment patterns that favor slow‐twitch fiber utilization (Sawka et al. 1983). Further reports have shown lower glycogen utilization in type 1 fibers (Kirwan et al. 1987; Febbraio et al. 1994; King et al. 1985) and a slight increase in lipid oxidation following HA (Kirwan et al. 1987). It has also been shown that HA improves skeletal muscle contractile function, along with the torque/electromyographic relationship (Racinais et al. 2017), which may contribute to improve exercise economy during exercise at a given workrate post‐HA. Alternatively, the decrease in metabolic rate following HA may relate to a reduction in plasma epinephrine (Febbraio et al. 1994), which during exercise increases glycogenolytic rate by stimulating the conversion of phosphorylase to its active form (Richter 1984). Febbraio et al. (1994) demonstrated that a post‐HA reduction in plasma epinephrine was accompanied by decreases in muscle lactate accumulation, blood glucose, and lactate concentration. Given the limited research in this area, however, the mechanistic pathway(s) via which metabolic rate is reduced following HA remains to be elucidated.
4.2. Hematological Responses
Hematological adaptations in response to repeated heat exposure are well documented and are typically characterized by an increase in BV due to the rapid expansion of PV (Horowitz 2014; Périard et al. 2021). The reduction in HR during exercise has been partly attributed to this expansion of PV (Sawka et al. 2011; Sawka 1996; Périard et al. 2016), which may also contribute to increase ventricular filling and stroke volume, allowing for cardiac output and blood pressure to be better maintained (Keiser et al. 2015; Nielsen et al. 1997). Although additional research is required to fully elucidate this relationship (Wilson et al. 2020; Trachsel et al. 2020; Travers, González‐Alonso, et al. 2020), our model estimated a PV expansion of 5.6% after 8 days of HA, which is slightly greater than other meta‐analyses reporting a 3.8%–4.3% expansion (Tyler et al. 2016, 2024) and much larger than a recent meta‐analysis of HA in females reporting a 1% contraction (Kelly et al. 2023). Of note, the PV analysis conducted in the current review included a much larger sample (n = 859) than previous meta‐analyses primarily in males (Tyler et al. 2016: n = 209, Tyler et al. 2024: n = 354) and females only (Kelly et al. 2023: n = 28), with our data highlighting the pronounced variability between studies, even with similar HA protocol characteristics (Figure S5).
The estimated change in BV following HA from a sample of 258 participants in the current study was 2.9%. Our results did not indicate any influence of HA protocol characteristics on changes in BV, other than a potential link with an additional 15 min of exposure (i.e., 0.7% further increase in BV). Another possible link, albeit small, between PV expansion and exposure duration was noted, with a 0.4% further increase estimated per additional 15 min of exposure, which contrasts with a previous meta‐analysis reporting no association (Tyler et al. 2016). The mechanisms of fluid retention and PV expansion with HA relate to the combined osmotic pressure exerted by proteins (e.g., albumin) and electrolytes (e.g., sodium) across fluid compartments (Harrison et al. 1981; Senay 1979). These changes in osmotic pressure result in the intravascular influx of fluid from the interstitial compartment, increasing PV. As such, the potential link between HA exposure duration and PV expansion is unclear and likely to be an artifact associated with measurement errors (Gore et al. 2005; Harrison 1985). For example, Senay et al. (1976) reported a mean PV expansion of 23.5% following nine prolonged (240 min) HA exposures. In contrast, the two other studies with 16 and 9 exposures of 240 min reported a PV expansion of 4.8% (Wyndham et al. 1968) and 8.0% (Kotze et al. 1977), respectively. While the relationship between PV expansion and exposure duration is intriguing, it requires clarification.
An increase in RCV of 1.3% was estimated from our analysis after ~12 days of exercise‐HA. Although an increase in RCV is typically accompanied by a concomitant increase in Hbmass (Lundby et al. 2021; Rønnestad, Hamarsland, et al. 2021), based on our model, ~13 days of exercise‐HA did not increase Hbmass (−3.6 g), with only four of the 12 papers reporting an increase (range: 17–42 g; Lundby et al. 2021; Rønnestad, Hamarsland, et al. 2021; Rønnestad et al. 2022; Oberholzer et al. 2019). These papers involved pooling data from three separate 10‐day HA regimens to demonstrate an increase in Hbmass (Lundby et al. 2021), or were conducted over a much longer time frame (~5 weeks of HA; Rønnestad, Hamarsland, et al. 2021; Rønnestad et al. 2022; Oberholzer et al. 2019). Accordingly, it has recently been suggested that prolonged HA regimens are required to increase RCV and Hbmass (Bennett et al. 2024), which is supported by data from studies with 25–40 days of HA using thermal clothing to limit heat loss during exercise in temperate conditions (Rønnestad, Hansen, et al. 2021; Lundby et al. 2023; Cubel et al. 2024). Our analysis supports this view, with an estimated change in Hbmass of 1.9 g for every additional day of heat exposure beyond the global mean of ~13 days (e.g., 19.9 g increase in Hbmass after 25 days of HA). The kinetics of change in RCV and Hbmass with exercise‐HA align somewhat with those of an endurance training study demonstrating a 6% increase in RCV after 4 weeks and a 10% increase in Hbmass after 8 weeks, following the expansion of PV and increase in circulating erythropoietin (EPO) concentration after 2 weeks of training (Montero et al. 2017). The potential pathways for increasing RCV and Hbmass include the acute activation of hypoxia‐inducible factor‐α and EPO release from exercising muscle (Lundby et al. 2006; Rundqvist et al. 2009), as well as post‐exercise peripheral vasodilation prompting the secretion of BV‐regulating hormones and stimulating erythropoiesis (Montero et al. 2016; Piepoli et al. 1993). It may also relate to early PV expansion driving hypoxia feedback loops to restore hematocrit (Sawka et al. 2000; Schmidt and Prommer 2008; Kjellberg et al. 1949), or potential alterations in the secretion patterns of growth hormone, insulin‐like growth factor, testosterone, catecholamines, and cortisol influencing RCV production and/or release from bone marrow (Hu and Lin 2012). Given the limited sample size in this model (n = 139), more studies are required to further our understanding of the relationship between exercise‐HA protocol length and increases in RCV and Hbmass.
4.3. Thermal Responses
The 0.19°C reduction in resting T core following exercise‐HA estimated in this meta‐analysis aligns with previous reports conducted primarily in males (Tyler et al. 2016: −0.18°C, Tyler et al. 2024: −0.16°C) and females only (Kelly et al. 2023: −0.15°C). Although our model estimated a further 0.01°C reduction in resting T core with an additional exposure day (Figure 5A), it is likely not meaningful as an additional 7 days of HA would only further reduce resting T core by ~0.07°C. When examining the impact of HA protocol characteristics on resting T core, none appeared to have a meaningful influence, although Tyler et al. (2016) previously suggested that maintaining the thermal impulse throughout HA may further reduce resting T core. This suggestion was largely based on data from Patterson et al. (2004a) who demonstrated that reductions in resting T core were greater after 22 days (0.32°C) compared to 8 days (0.20°C) of controlled hyperthermia HA (target T core: ~38.5°C). In contrast, Gibson, Mee, Tuttle, et al. (2015) reported similar reductions in resting T core after 5 (0.20°C) and 10 days (0.19°C) of controlled hyperthermia HA (target T core: ~38.5°C), with no further reduction experienced in a separate group in which the target T core increased to 39.0°C from days 5 to 10 (0.21°C and 0.19°C, respectively). In the current meta‐analysis, the constant workrate (−0.21°C), controlled hyperthermia (−0.20°C), controlled HR (−0.18°C), and intermittent exercise (−0.17°C) HA approaches appear to elicit a similar reduction in resting T core. These data highlight how the adaptive stimulus (i.e., exercise‐HA) might obscure the potential for a specific HA approach to provide a greater reduction in resting T core.
A reduction in end‐exercise T core of 0.43°C was estimated in the current meta‐analysis, which is similar to Kelly et al. (2023: −0.41°C) and slightly higher than Tyler et al. (2016: −0.34°C). The reduction in T core has been reported to primarily develop within the first week of HA (Pandolf 1998), which is in line with the current analysis estimating a small additional benefit (−0.01°C) for every additional exposure (Figure 6A). This notion is strengthened by the large sample size used to estimate the change in end‐exercise T core in the current meta‐analysis (n = 1261). Notwithstanding, T a (5°C increase) and exposure duration (additional 15 min per exposure) were estimated to influence the change in end‐exercise T core, with a further reduction of 0.05°C and 0.04°C, respectively. Although independently these changes are relatively small, the combination of increasing T a and exposure duration over additional HA days is likely to promote a further reduction in end‐exercise T core.
A lowering of exercising T sk following HA is purported to arise from an enhanced sweat rate (Sawka 1996; Périard et al. 2016; Sawka et al. 2010), coupled with greater evaporative heat loss (Poirier et al. 2015). Our analysis estimated a comparable reduction in end‐exercise T sk (−0.54°C) to that of a meta‐analysis in females only (−0.50°C; Kelly ey al. 2023), and predominantly in males (−0.57; Tyler et al. 2016). Our analysis extends these observations to indicate that end‐exercise T sk is further lowered by a 5°C increase in T a (0.18°C) and an additional day of exposure (0.03°C) during HA (Figure 7A). While these further reductions in end‐exercise T sk may appear trivial, our modeling indicates that increasing T a by more than 5°C during HA and/or adding several HA days would promote a more robust adaptive response. Moreover, when comparing the influence of HA approaches on the change in end‐exercise T sk, controlled hyperthermia (−0.64°C) appeared to provide a stronger stimulus compared to constant workrate HA (−0.46°C; Figure 7B), which may partly be explained by the slightly larger increase in WBSR (209 mL·h−1 vs. 163 mL·h−1), assuming additional evaporation. Changes in end‐exercise T sk were also noted following intermittent exercise (−0.66°C) and controlled HR (−0.42°C) HA, although in much smaller samples (n = 34 and 47, respectively).
4.4. Sweating Responses
Data from our meta‐analysis indicate an increase in WBSR of 163 mL·h−1 following ~8 days of exercise‐HA (Figure 8A), with large heterogeneity between studies (Figure S11). Indeed, several studies documented increases in WBSR of ≥ 500 mL·h−1 (Lundby et al. 2021; Lee et al. 2016; Gibson, Mee, Tuttle, et al. 2015; Curley and Hawkins 1983), with values included in the analysis ranging from −300 to 890 mL·h−1 (Lee and Thake 2017; Roussey et al. 2021). Despite the 5%–7% day‐to‐day variability in individual WBSR (Baker et al. 2009; Hayden et al. 2004), several studies documented a lack of change in WBSR with exercise‐HA (Shapiro et al. 1980; Pandolf et al. 1977; Roussey et al. 2021; Amano et al. 2015, 2016; Aoyagi et al. 1995a, 1998; Brock et al. 1982; Frank et al. 2001; Hahn et al. 1986; Kelly et al. 2016; Petersen et al. 2010; Reeve et al. 2019; Rivas et al. 2017; Takeno et al. 2001; Willmott et al. 2016; Armstrong et al. 1987; McGlynn et al. 2022; Waldock et al. 2021), which is somewhat surprising given that an increase in WBSR is a hallmark heat adaptation (Sawka 1996). The heterogeneity in WBSR adaptations may stem from methodological issues with heat response testing (e.g., short‐duration or intermittent heat response tests, and/or post‐testing conducted in less thermally challenging environments).
Of the HA protocol characteristics potentially influencing WBSR, the addition of one exposure day (9 mL·h−1) and 1 kPa (37 mL·h−1) emerged as influential. Tyler et al. (2016) previously reported a strong‐positive relationship between T a and WBSR, but not relative humidity. The discrepancy in findings may stem from our analysis using P a, which reflects absolute humidity at a given T a and thus the total amount of water vapor in the air, and the potential for evaporative heat loss (Gagge and Hardy 1967; Gagge and Gonzalez 2010). In contrast, relative humidity is the amount of water vapor in the air expressed as a percentage of the amount of water vapor needed to achieve saturation at a given temperature, which is not reflective of evaporative heat loss potential (Kerslake 1972). To the best of our knowledge, there are only three studies to date that have directly compared exercise‐HA in a range of environments with different P a (Shvartz et al. 1973; Griefahn 1997; Tebeck et al. 2020), alongside two separate studies with similar designs conducted in low (Nielsen et al. 1993) and high P a environments (Nielsen et al. 1997). Data from these studies indicate the potential for exercise‐HA undertaken in environments with high P a (4.42–5.65 kPA) to elicit a slightly greater increase in WBSR compared to low‐moderate P a (1.68–3.45 kPa) (Shvartz et al. 1973; Griefahn 1997; Nielsen et al. 1993, 1997). Of these studies, Griefahn (1997) reported a slightly larger change in WBSR following HA in high (132 mL·h−1) compared to low (89 mL·h−1) P a conditions, noting that the change in high P a conditions was highly variable. Shvartz et al. (1973) reported a 234 and 128 mL·h−1 increase in WBSR after exercise‐HA in 5.5 and 3.5 kPa conditions, respectively, although no direct comparison between conditions was made. This is similar to Nielsen et al. (1993, 1997) who demonstrated a larger WBSR increase after exercise‐HA in high (26%; Nielsen et al. 1997) compared to low (17%; Nielsen et al. 1993) P a environments in separate studies. In contrast, Tebeck et al. (2020) reported improvements in WBSR following exercise‐HA in low P a conditions (200 mL·h−1) and no change in high P a. The latter observation may relate to the 5‐day HA protocol not being long enough to induce robust sudomotor adaptations, with our model estimating a slightly more pronounced WBSR increase with additional exposure days (9 mL·h−1) beyond the initial 8 days of exercise‐HA (Figure 8A). However, it is important to note the limited number of HA papers with 15 or more days of exposure (Griefahn 1997; Patterson et al. 2004a, 2014; Fortney and Vroman 1985; Racinais et al. 2024), such that caution should be used when extrapolating how WBSR may increase with additional exposures. Further research with longer regimens is thus required to develop a better understanding of the potential for WBSR changes to occur over a protracted timeframe, in hot‐dry and warm‐humid environments, as well as the cross‐acclimation potential between these environments. Notwithstanding, our model supports a further increase in WBSR with HA undertaken in high relative to low P a conditions, despite a lack of evidence from studies directly comparing HA in dry and humid conditions.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta‐analysis to examine LSR following exercise‐HA, with changes in both the upper back (0.17 mg·cm−2·min−1) and forearm (0.27 mg·cm−2·min−1) estimated from our models. These estimates align with a recent 7‐day HA study demonstrating increases in upper back and forearm LSR of 0.18 and 0.33 mg·cm−2·min−1, respectively (Lynch et al. 2024). The slightly greater increase in forearm LSR likely relates to interregional variations in the capacity to increase LSR with HA, which has previously been demonstrated following hot‐dry (Smith and Havenith 2019) and hot‐humid HA (Patterson et al. 2004a). Our data are thus in agreement with the relative preferential redistribution of LSR toward the forearm following HA (Patterson et al. 2004a; Smith and Havenith 2019). The greater improvement in LSR of the upper limbs and preferential shift toward the periphery contributes to a more uniform distribution of skin wettedness, potentially leading to a higher evaporative efficiency (Smith and Havenith 2019). However, given the limited LSR data, along with the low inter‐day reliability (Peel et al. 2022) and high inter‐study variability (Figures S12 and S13), additional research is required to better characterize the impact of HA protocol characteristics on LSR.
The increase in WBSR during HA typically occurs alongside a reduction in sweat [Na+] (Keiser et al. 2015; Rendell et al. 2017; Patterson et al. 2014; Kaufman et al. 1988; McCleave et al. 2019; Neal, Massey et al. 2016; Neal, Corbett, et al. 2016). Our findings align with this notion as a reduction in sweat [Na+] of 20 mmol·L−1 was estimated following ~8 days of exercise‐HA. However, while the increase in WBSR is commonly suggested to develop over a longer period (Sawka et al. 2011; Périard et al. 2021; Daanen et al. 2018), which is supported by our WBSR model, this pattern was not evident with sweat [Na+] (i.e., no change per additional day of exposure). This suggests that the reduction in sweat [Na+] may occur more rapidly than the increase in WBSR. However, similar to the LSR analysis, a lack of studies examining sweat [Na+] does not allow for drawing robust inferences regarding the influence of HA protocol characteristics on changes in sweat [Na+]. Nevertheless, sweat [Na+] decreases following HA, which leads to a more dilute sweat and may improve evaporative heat loss due to an increase in the saturated water vapor pressure at the surface of the skin for a given temperature (Kerslake 1972). Reductions in sweat [Na+] are thus an important adaptation following HA (Périard et al. 2015), particularly in humid environments where evaporative efficiency is reduced due to an elevated P a.
4.5. Exercise Capacity and Performance
Our analysis estimated a large improvement in time to exhaustion (48.7%), with 70% of the included papers showing an improvement following exercise‐HA (Burk et al. 2012; Kaldur et al. 2014; Oöpik et al. 2014; Tamm et al. 2015, Nielsen et al. 1993, 1997; Mikkelsen et al. 2019) and one reporting an impairment (27.2%), which the authors attributed to a lack of recovery following a short‐term high‐intensity protocol (Reeve et al. 2019). The estimated improvement from our analysis is effectively double the 22% and 23% improvement in exercise capacity reported by Tyler et al. (2016, 2024), and likely relates to our analysis separating time to exhaustion and incremental exercise tests, rather than analyzing them in combination. Indeed, an improvement of 14.2% in incremental exercise time was estimated from our analysis following an exercise preload in the heat (range: 21–90 min), with all papers reporting an improvement following exercise‐HA (Gale et al. 2021; Shaw et al. 2022; Alkemade et al. 2021; Garrett et al. 2009; Gerrett et al. 2021). The magnitude of improvement in incremental exercise capacity was substantially less than that of time to exhaustion, likely due to the distinctiveness of the protocols and the vastly different mean baseline exercise times (8.5 min vs. 65.4 min, respectively). This difference reinforces the rationale for separating time to exhaustion and incremental exercise tests when investigating changes in exercise capacity following HA.
In a recent meta‐analysis of HA and exercise capacity, Benjamin et al. (2019) reported an improvement of 144.30 s in time to exhaustion based on 24 papers. However, given the use of different inclusion/exclusion criteria, such as time to exhaustion tests in both temperate (< 25°C) and hot (≥ 25°C) conditions, as well as time‐based heat response tests (Benjamin et al. 2019), it is difficult to draw direct comparisons with our data. In our analysis, time to exhaustion tests were based on the attainment of volitional fatigue, or a physiological/ethical cutoff point (T core > 40°C or 95% HRmax) in hot conditions (≥ 30°C), and as such excluded studies that had a predefined endpoint based on time (Pandolf et al. 1988; Gibson, Mee, Tuttle, et al. 2015; Aoyagi et al. 1998; Horstman and Christensen 1982). The rationale for this decision was based on participants exercising until a similar physiological endpoint to that of the pre‐acclimation test, rather than a time point that may or may not have been reached during the pre‐acclimation heat response test.
Along with changes in exercise capacity, HA improves performance during self‐paced (i.e., time trial) exercise in hot environments. This improvement was highlighted in our analysis by the 3.1% increase in performance, although with no apparent influence of an additional day of exposure (Figure 10A). The smallest improvement in performance was 0.7% (Garrett et al. 2012), with the largest being ~7% (James et al. 2017; Guy et al. 2016). The larger improvements were reported during 5‐km cycling (Guy et al. 2016) and running (James et al. 2017) time trials in 35°C–37°C following 7 and 5 days of controlled hyperthermia HA, respectively. Our analysis failed to identify a relationship between time trial performance and a 5°C increase in T a during exercise‐HA (−0.5% [−2.1, 1.0]), which contrasts the weak‐moderate correlation between performance improvements and T a reported by Tyler et al. (2016). Taken together, it appears that further research is required to better understand the impact of environmental characteristics during HA on performance, as only 17 papers were included in our model. This call for research also extends to HA approach, despite estimated changes in performance of 2.8%–3.7% across the different approaches, which corroborates the findings of a previous meta‐analysis (Benjamin et al. 2019).
4.6. Interorgan Communication
The kinetics of cardiovascular, hematological, thermal, and sweating adaptations related to exercise‐heat stress are underpinned by molecular and interorgan communication signals that coordinate integrated physiological responses. Indeed, molecular and cellular mechanisms provide the foundation for the phenotypical changes associated with hyperthermia and HA (Horowitz 2014; Murray et al. 2022). During exercise‐heat exposure, thermal stress is sensed by peripheral and central thermoreceptors (Boulant and Dean 1986; Filingeri 2016). These receptors provide afferent input to the hypothalamic thermoregulatory center, where they are integrated and produce efferent neural signals for heat dissipation via cutaneous vasodilation and eccrine sweating (Ravanelli et al. 2021; Romanovsky 2018). With repeated heat exposures, neural adaptations occur that lower the temperature threshold required to initiate heat loss responses, and peripheral neurotransmitter adaptations in the cutaneous vasculature and eccrine sweat glands augment the sensitivity of these responses (Horowitz 2014; Sawka et al. 2011; Werner 1994). The improved capacity to dissipate heat attenuates thermal strain during exercise in the heat and contributes to reduce resting core temperature.
The cardiovascular response to heat stress includes increased cutaneous vasodilation, which elevates cardiac output (Crandall and Wilson 2015). The ability to sustain cardiac output is challenged during prolonged exercise in the heat by reduced cardiac filling pressures and difficulty defending blood pressure, especially with dehydration (Périard et al. 2021; Trangmar and González‐Alonso 2019). However, the repeatedly elevated cardiac output (i.e., chronic volume overload) with HA improves myocardial contractility and efficiency (in the animal model; Levy et al. 1997), which supports cardiac output and blood pressure regulation (Sawka et al. 2011). Likewise, improvements in the sweating response lower skin temperature and increase the core‐to‐skin temperature gradient, allowing for reduced skin blood flow requirements, and thus cardiac output, contributing to lower heart rate during exercise‐heat stress. Cardiac output and blood pressure regulation are further supported by HA‐induced BV and PV expansion, which also supports thermoregulation.
Elevated tissue temperatures during exercise‐heat stress induce cellular stress responses and under‐perfusion activates oxidative and nitrogen species stress signaling pathways. These communication signals upregulate heat shock protein and cytokine responses to provide tissue/organ protection (Sawka et al. 2011; Hasday et al. 2014). The endocrine system is also influenced by the HA phenotype, with adjustments in signals originating from the hypothalamus, pituitary, adrenal, thyroid, and pancreas (Francesconi 1988; Hannan et al. 2024). Indeed, exercise‐heat exposure alters renin, aldosterone, and vasopressin secretion to expand and conserve body fluids. Likewise, catecholamine, glucocorticoid, growth, and thyroid hormones provide communication signals supporting blood pressure regulation, metabolism, protein synthesis, and inflammatory responses.
Taken together, there is clear interorgan communication involved in the development of the HA phenotype, mediated through coordinated physiological responses and mechanistic pathways. The relative contribution of each response and mechanism to adaptation kinetics is determined by the strength of the perturbation to homeostasis, resulting from HA protocol characteristics.
4.7. Limitations
The aim of this review was to provide insights regarding the influence of HA protocol characteristics on the kinetics of adaptation; however, due to the nature of HA studies, certain limitations should be acknowledged. As previously highlighted, there are important intra‐individual differences in HA adaptations within studies (Corbett et al. 2018), which are compounded when comparing studies. The heterogeneity between paper outcomes can be clearly observed in Material S2, which highlights the differences between outcomes based on HA approach and testing. Notwithstanding, a large proportion of HA protocol characteristics within the literature are somewhat homogenous, with several study characteristics being similar to those of the global means (i.e., ~8 days, ~90 min per exposure, ~39.1°C and ~2.78 kPa). Another important consideration is that while the data used in the meta‐analyses were obtained from heat response tests, the characteristics (i.e., T a, P a and duration) of these tests differed at times from those of the HA protocol (Travers et al. 2021; Travers, Nichols, et al. 2020; Travers, González‐Alonso, et al. 2020; Gibson, Mee, Tuttle, et al. 2015; Poirier et al. 2015, 2016; Garrett et al. 2012, 2014, 2019; Flouris et al. 2014; James et al. 2018; Neufer et al. 1989), which were used to estimate changes in outcome variables. However, this is the case for all HA meta‐analyses. Finally, although percentage changes in PV, time to exhaustion, incremental exercise capacity, and time trial performance were modeled in our analyses, which may not be the optimal approach (Vickers 2001), it aligns with the common reporting method for PV in the literature, accounts for the differing baseline times in exercise capacity tests, and allows for combining different types of performance tests (e.g., distance and time‐based time trials). Ultimately, additional studies and/or greater uniformity between pre‐ and post‐HA testing and protocols within and between studies may help strengthen the interpretability of future study findings.
5. Conclusion
To date, this is the largest systematic review with meta‐analyses to explore the adaptive response and performance/capacity changes associated with HA. A novel feature of our analyses was the integration of HA protocol characteristics and HA approach used to induce adaptations (Figure 11). These analyses indicate that:
Exercise‐HA lowered resting and end‐exercise HR (5 and 17 beats·min−1), exercise metabolic rate (87 mL·min−1), resting and end‐exercise T core (0.19°C and 0.43°C), and end‐exercise T sk (0.54°C).
Exercise‐HA expanded BV (2.9%), PV (5.6%), and RCV (1.3%), increased WBSR (163 mL·h−1), and improved time to exhaustion (48.7%), incremental exercise time (14.2%), and time trial performance (3.1%).
Extending HA by 1 day further reduced resting T core (0.01°C) and end‐exercise T sk (0.03°C), and increased Hbmass (1.9 g) and WBSR (9 mL·h−1).
The addition of 15 min to each exposure duration further lowered end‐exercise HR (1 beats·min−1), lowered end‐exercise T core (0.04°C), and expanded PV (0.4%).
A 5°C increase in T a during HA further lowered end‐exercise HR (2 beats·min−1), end‐exercise T core (0.05°C), and end‐exercise T sk (0.18°C).
Elevating P a by 1 kPa during HA increased RCV (0.7%) and enhanced WBSR (37 mL·h−1).
Controlled hyperthermia HA does not further reduce end‐exercise HR or T core compared to constant workrate HA; however, the controlled hyperthermia approach does appear to lower end‐exercise T sk to a greater extent and possibly increase WBSR.
Higher pre‐HA baseline values in resting HR and T core are associated with a greater magnitude of change following HA.
FIGURE 11.

Physiological and performance adaptations associated with exercise heat acclimation (~8 days, 90 min per day, 39.1°C, and 2.78 kPa), along with the influence of adjusting protocol characteristics on adaptation kinetics.
6. Further Research Considerations
The heterogeneity between studies within the HA literature has previously been identified as a problem when ascertaining the effects of HA protocols (Tyler et al. 2016). To improve the ability to compare HA protocol characteristics and further our understanding of their influence on the adaptive response, it is recommended that:
More long‐term HA interventions (> 15 exposure days) be undertaken to expand the volume of data regarding the kinetics of adaptation, particularly sweating and hematological adaptations.
Female representation should be increased across all HA interventions to develop our understanding of potential sex differences in the heat acclimated phenotype.
Cross‐acclimation studies comparing the physiological and performance responses to dry and humid HA conditions be conducted.
Studies comparing consecutive to nonconsecutive day HA protocols should be performed, as these apply to elite athlete populations.
Additional research using different HA approaches (i.e., controlled HR, intermittent exercise) be conducted to more clearly elucidate their impact on the adaptive process.
Sudomotor adaptations be appropriately contextualized to avoid methodological issues with testing (e.g., short‐duration or intermittent heat response tests, less thermally challenging post‐test) leading to misinterpretation of findings.
When investigating changes in time trial performance and exercise capacity following HA, consider accounting for factors such as participant fitness level (O2peak), training history, test protocol and duration, and the number of rest/recovery days following HA before testing.
Author Contributions
P.M., H.A.B., M.N.S., B.C., and J.D.P. conceptualized and designed the study. P.M. and H.A.B. completed all database searches. P.M., H.A.B., T.H.T., M.K.K., and W.T.J. were involved in the data extraction and assessment of bias. P.M., J.D.P., and A.P.W. analyzed the data and created the publicly available online predictor. P.M., M.N.S., B.C., and J.D.P. were involved in the interpretation of the data. P.M. and J.D.P. drafted the initial manuscript, which was reviewed and edited by all authors. All authors approved the submitted manuscript.
Ethics Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
Consent
The authors have nothing to report.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Data S1.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- Adams, E. L. , Vandermark L. W., Pryor J. L., et al. 2017. “Effects of Heat Acclimation on Hand Cooling Efficacy Following Exercise in the Heat.” Journal of Sports Sciences 35: 828–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alkemade, P. , Gerrett N., Daanen H. A., Eijsvogels T. M., Janssen T. W., and Keaney L. C.. 2022. “Heat Acclimation Does Not Negatively Affect Salivary Immunoglobulin‐A and Self‐Reported Illness Symptoms and Wellness in Recreational Athletes.” Temperature 9: 331–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alkemade, P. , Gerrett N., Eijsvogels T. M. H., and Daanen H. A. M.. 2021. “Individual Characteristics Associated With the Magnitude of Heat Acclimation Adaptations.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 121: 1593–1606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allan, J. 1965. “The Effects of Physical Training in a Temperate and Hot Climate on the Physiological Responses to Heat Stress.” Ergonomics 8: 445–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amano, T. , Gerrett N., Inoue Y., Nishiyasu T., Havenith G., and Kondo N.. 2016. “Determination of the Maximum Rate of Eccrine Sweat Glands' Ion Reabsorption Using the Galvanic Skin Conductance to Local Sweat Rate Relationship.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 116: 281–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amano, T. , Inoue Y., Koga S., Nishiyasu T., and Kondo N.. 2015. “Influence of Exercise Training With Thigh Compression on Heat‐Loss Responses.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 25: 173–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amorim, F. , Yamada P., Robergs R., Schneider S., and Moseley P.. 2011. “Effects of Whole‐Body Heat Acclimation on Cell Injury and Cytokine Responses in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 111: 1609–1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aoyagi, Y. , McLellan T. M., and Shephard R. J.. 1994. “Effects of Training and Acclimation on Heat Tolerance in Exercising Men Wearing Protective Clothing.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 68: 234–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aoyagi, Y. , McLellan T. M., and Shephard R. J.. 1995a. “Effects of 6 Versus 12 D of Heat Acclimation on Heat Tolerance in Lightly Exercising Men Wearing Protective Clothing.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 71: 187–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aoyagi, Y. , McLellan T. M., and Shephard R. J.. 1995b. “Determination of Body Heat Storage in Clothing: Calorimetry Versus Thermometry.” European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 71: 197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aoyagi, Y. , McLellan T. M., and Shephard R. J.. 1998. “Effects of Endurance Training and Heat Acclimation on Psychological Strain in Exercising Men Wearing Protective Clothing.” Ergonomics 41: 328–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong, L. E. , Francesconi R. P., Kraemer W. J., Leva N., De Luca J. P., and Hubbard R. W.. 1989. “Plasma Cortisol, Renin, and Aldosterone During an Intense Heat Acclimation Program.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 10: 38–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong, L. E. , Hubbard R. W., Christensen E. L., and De Luca J. P.. 1990. “Evaluation of a Temperate‐Environment Test of Heat Tolerance in Prior Heatstroke Patients and Controls.” European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 60: 202–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong, L. E. , Hubbard R. W., DeLuca J. P., Christensen E. L., and Kraemer W. J.. 1987. “Evaluation of a Temperate Environment Test to Predict Heat Tolerance.” European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 56: 384–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avellini, B. A. , Kamon E., and Krajewski J. T.. 1980. “Physiological Responses of Physically Fit Men and Women to Acclimation to Humid Heat.” Journal of Applied Physiology 49: 254–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avellini, B. A. , Shapiro Y., Fortney S., Wenger C., and Pandolf K.. 1982. “Effects on Heat Tolerance of Physical Training in Water and on Land.” Journal of Applied Physiology 53: 1291–1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avellini, B. A. , Shapiro Y., Pandolf K. B., Pimental N. A., and Goldman R. F.. 1980. “Physiological Responses of Men and Women to Prolonged Dry Heat Exposure.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 51: 1081–1085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker, L. B. , Stofan J. R., Hamilton A. A., and Horswill C. A.. 2009. “Comparison of Regional Patch Collection vs. Whole Body Washdown for Measuring Sweat Sodium and Potassium Loss During Exercise.” Journal of Applied Physiology 107: 887–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barberio, M. D. , Elmer D. J., Laird R. H., Lee K. A., Gladden B., and Pascoe D. D.. 2015. “Systemic Lps and Inflammatory Response During Consecutive Days of Exercise in Heat.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 36: 262–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bass, D. E. , and Jacobson E. D.. 1965. “Effects of Salicylate on Acclimitization to Work in the Heat.” Journal of Applied Physiology 20: 70–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benjamin, C. L. , Sekiguchi Y., Fry L. A., and Casa D. J.. 2019. “Performance Changes Following Heat Acclimation and the Factors That Influence These Changes: Meta‐Analysis and Meta‐Regression.” Frontiers in Physiology 10: 1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennett, S. , Tiollier E., Owens D. J., Brocherie F., and Louis J. B.. 2024. “Implications of Heat Stress‐Induced Metabolic Alterations for Endurance Training.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 45: 422–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Best, S. , Thompson M., Caillaud C., Holvik L., Fatseas G., and Tammam A.. 2014. “Exercise‐Heat Acclimation in Young and Older Trained Cyclists.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 17: 677–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borg, D. N. , Impellizzeri F., Borg S. J., et al. 2023. “Meta‐Analysis Prediction Intervals Are Under Reported in Sport and Exercise Medicine.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 34, no. 3: e14603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borg, D. N. , Stewart I. B., Osborne J. O., et al. 2020. “The Effects of Daily Cold‐Water Recovery and Postexercise Hot‐Water Immersion on Training‐Load Tolerance During 5 D of Heat‐Based Training.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 15: 639–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borg, M. A. , Xiang J., Anikeeva O., et al. 2021. “Occupational Heat Stress and Economic Burden: A Review of Global Evidence.” Environmental Research 195: 110781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boulant, J. A. , and Dean J. B.. 1986. “Temperature Receptors in the Central Nervous System.” Annual Review of Physiology 48: 639–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brade, C. , Dawson B., and Wallman K.. 2013. “Effect of Precooling and Acclimation on Repeat‐Sprint Performance in Heat.” Journal of Sports Sciences 31: 779–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brock, P. J. , Sciaraffa D., and Greenleaf J. E.. 1982. “Effect of Physical Training in Cool and Hot Environments on +Gz Acceleration Tolerance in Women.” Physiologist 22: S41–S42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown, H. A. , Topham T. H., Clark B., et al. 2023. “Quantifying Exercise Heat Acclimatisation in Athletes and Military Personnel: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Sports Medicine 54: 727–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buono, M. J. , Ball K. D., and Kolkhorst F. W.. 2007. “Sodium Ion Concentration vs. Sweat Rate Relationship in Humans.” Journal of Applied Physiology 103: 990–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buono, M. J. , Heaney J. H., and Canine K. M.. 1998. “Acclimation to Humid Heat Lowers Resting Core Temperature.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 274: 1295–1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buono, M. J. , Kolding M., Leslie E., et al. 2018. “Heat Acclimation Causes a Linear Decrease in Sweat Sodium Ion Concentration.” Journal of Thermal Biology 71: 237–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buono, M. J. , Numan T. R., Claros R. M., Brodine S. K., and Kolkhorst F. W.. 2009. “Is Active Sweating During Heat Acclimation Required for Improvements in Peripheral Sweat Gland Function?” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 297: R1082–R1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burk, A. , Timpmann S., Kreegipuu K., Tamm M., Unt E., and Ööpik V.. 2012. “Effects of Heat Acclimation on Endurance Capacity and Prolactin Response to Exercise in the Heat.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 112: 4091–4101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bürkner, P.‐C. 2017. “brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan.” Journal of Statistical Software 80: 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Callovini, A. , Fornasiero A., Savoldelli A., et al. 2021. “Effects of Three‐Exercise Sessions in the Heat on Endurance Cycling Performance.” Journal of Thermal Biology 98: 102925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, H. A. , Akerman A. P., Kissling L. S., et al. 2022. “Acute Physiological and Psychophysical Responses to Different Modes of Heat Stress.” Experimental Physiology 107: 429–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casadio, J. R. , Kilding A. E., Siegel R., Cotter J. D., and Laursen P. B.. 2016. “Periodizing Heat Acclimation in Elite Laser Sailors Preparing for a World Championship Event in Hot Conditions.” Temperature 3: 437–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castle, P. , Mackenzie R. W., Maxwell N., Webborn A. D. J., and Watt P. W.. 2011. “Heat Acclimation Improves Intermittent Sprinting in the Heat but Additional Pre‐Cooling Offers no Further Ergogenic Effect.” Journal of Sports Sciences 29: 1125–1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalmers, S. , Esterman A., Eston R., Bowering K. J., and Norton K.. 2014. “Short‐Term Heat Acclimation Training Improves Physical Performance: A Systematic Review, and Exploration of Physiological Adaptations and Application for Team Sports.” Sports Medicine 44: 971–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalmers, S. , Esterman A., Eston R., and Norton K.. 2016. “Brief Heat Training: No Improvement of the Lactate Threshold in Mild Conditions.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 11: 1029–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, T.‐I. , Tsai P.‐H., Lin J.‐H., Lee N.‐Y., and Liang M. T.. 2013. “Effect of Short‐Term Heat Acclimation on Endurance Time and Skin Blood Flow in Trained Athletes.” Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 4: 161–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W. , and Elizondo R.. 1974. “Peripheral Modification of Thermoregulatory Function During Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 37: 367–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheuvront, S. N. , Chinevere T. D., Ely B. R., et al. 2008. “Serum S‐100β Response to Exercise‐Heat Strain Before and After Acclimation.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 40: 1477–1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chinevere, T. D. , Kenefick R. W., Cheuvront S. N., Lukaski H. C., and Sawka M. N.. 2008. “Effect of Heat Acclimation on Sweat Minerals.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 40: 886–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ciuha, U. , Sotiridis A., Mlinar T., Royal J. T., Eiken O., and Mekjavic I. B.. 2021. “Heat Acclimation Enhances the Cold‐Induced Vasodilation Response.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 121: 3005–3015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cleland, T. S. , Horvath S. M., and Phillips M.. 1969. “Acclimatization of Women to Heat After Training.” Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie 27: 15–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corbett, J. , Massey H. C., Costello J. T., Tipton M. J., and Neal R. A.. 2022. “The Effect of Medium‐Term Heat Acclimation on Endurance Performance in a Temperate Environment.” European Journal of Sport Science 22: 190–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corbett, J. , Rendell R. A., Massey H. C., Costello J. T., and Tipton M. J.. 2018. “Inter‐Individual Variation in the Adaptive Response to Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Thermal Biology 74: 29–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crandall, C. G. , and Wilson T. E.. 2015. “Human Cardiovascular Responses to Passive Heat Stress.” Comprehensive Physiology 5: 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cubel, C. , Fischer M., Stampe D., et al. 2024. “Time‐Course for Onset and Decay of Physiological Adaptations in Endurance Trained Athletes Undertaking Prolonged Heat Acclimation Training.” Temperature 11: 350–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curley, M. D. , and Hawkins R. N.. 1983. “Cognitive Performance During a Heat Acclimatization Regimen.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 54: 709–713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daanen, H. , Jonkman A., Layden J., Linnane D., and Weller A.. 2011. “Optimising the Acquisition and Retention of Heat Acclimation.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 32: 822–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daanen, H. A. M. , Racinais S., and Périard J. D.. 2018. “Heat Acclimation Decay and Re‐Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Sports Medicine 48: 409–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dawson, B. , Pyke F., and Morton A.. 1989. “Improvements in Heat Tolerance Induced by Interval Running Training in the Heat and in Sweat Clothing in Cool Conditions.” Journal of Sports Sciences 7: 189–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dileo, T. D. , Powell J. B., Kang H. K., Roberge R. J., Coca A., and Kim J.‐H.. 2016. “Effect of Short‐Term Heat Acclimation Training on Kinetics of Lactate Removal Following Maximal Exercise.” Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 56: 70–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dini, M. , Corbianco S., Rossi B., and Lucacchini A.. 2007. “Hyperhydrating With Glycerol: Effects on Thermoregulation, Hydration and Athletic Performance During Specific Exergonic Exercise in a Warm‐Humid Environment.” Sport Sciences for Health 2: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Duvnjak‐Zaknich, D. M. , Wallman K. E., Dawson B. T., and Peeling P.. 2019. “Continuous and Intermittent Heat Acclimation and Decay in Team Sport Athletes.” European Journal of Sport Science 19: 295–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epstein, Y. , Moran D. S., Heled Y., Kobo R., Lewkowicz M., and Levitan J.. 2010. “Acclimation to Heat Interpreted From the Analysis of Heart‐Rate Variability by the Multipole Method.” Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 21: 315–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Febbraio, M. A. , Snow R. J., Hargreaves M., Stathis C. G., Martin I. K., and Carey M. F.. 1994. “Muscle Metabolism During Exercise and Heat Stress in Trained Men: Effect of Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 76: 589–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fein, J. , Haymes E., and Buskirk E.. 1975. “Effects of Daily and Intermittent Exposures on Heat Acclimation of Women.” International Journal of Biometeorology 19: 41–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filingeri, D. 2016. “Neurophysiology of Skin Thermal Sensations.” Comprehensive Physiology 6: 1279–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finberg, J. P. , and Berlyne G. M.. 1977. “Modification of Renin and Aldosterone Response to Heat by Acclimatization in Man.” Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology 42: 554–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flouris, A. , Poirier M., Bravi A., et al. 2014. “Changes in Heart Rate Variability During the Induction and Decay of Heat Acclimation.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 114: 2119–2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fortney, S. M. , and Senay L. C.. 1979. “Effect of Training and Heat Acclimation on Exercise Responses of Sedentary Females.” Journal of Applied Physiology 47: 978–984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fortney, S. M. , and Vroman N. B.. 1985. “Exercise, Performance and Temperature Control: Temperature Regulation During Exercise and Implications for Sports Performance and Training.” Sports Medicine 2: 8–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francesconi, R. , Maher J., Bynum G., and Mason J.. 1977a. “Recurrent Heat Exposure: Effects on Levels of Plasma and Urinary Sodium and Potassium in Resting and Exercising Men.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 48: 399–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francesconi, R. P. 1988. “Endocrinological Responses to Exercise in Stressful Environments.” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 16: 235–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francesconi, R. P. , Maher J. T., Bynum G. D., and Mason J. W.. 1977b. “Recurrent Heat Exposure: Enzymatic Responses in Resting and Exercising Men.” Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology 43: 308–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francesconi, R. P. , Maher J. T., Mason J. W., and Bynum G. D.. 1978. “Hormonal Responses of Sedentary and Exercising Men to Recurrent Heat Exposure.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 49: 1102–1106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frank, A. , Belokopytov M., Moran D., Shapiro Y., and Epstein Y.. 2001. “Changes in Heart Rate Variability Following Acclimation to Heat.” Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 12: 19–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frye, A. , and Kamon E.. 1981. “Responses to Dry Heat of Men and Women With Similar Aerobic Capacities.” Journal of Applied Physiology 50: 65–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frye, A. , and Kamon E.. 1983. “Sweating Efficiency in Acclimated Men and Women Exercising in Humid and Dry Heat.” Journal of Applied Physiology 54: 972–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujii, N. , Honda Y., Ogawa T., et al. 2012. “Short‐Term Exercise‐Heat Acclimation Enhances Skin Vasodilation but Not Hyperthermic Hyperpnea in Humans Exercising in a Hot Environment.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 112: 295–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagge, A. , and Hardy J.. 1967. “Thermal Radiation Exchange of the Human by Partitional Calorimetry.” Journal of Applied Physiology 23: 248–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagge, A. P. , and Gonzalez R. R.. 2010. “Mechanisms of Heat Exchange: Biophysics and Physiology.” Comprehensive Physiology Supplement 14: 45–84. [Google Scholar]
- Gale, R. M. , Etxebarria N., Pumpa K. L., and Pyne D. B.. 2021. “Cycling‐Based Repeat Sprint Training in the Heat Enhances Running Performance in Team Sport Players.” European Journal of Sport Science 21: 695–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garden, J. W. , Wilson I. D., and Rasch P. J.. 1966. “Acclimatization of Healthy Young Adult Males to a Hot‐Wet Environment.” Journal of Applied Physiology 21: 665–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrett, A. T. , Creasy R., Rehrer N. J., Patterson M. J., and Cotter J. D.. 2012. “Effectiveness of Short‐Term Heat Acclimation for Highly Trained Athletes.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 112: 1827–1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrett, A. T. , Dodd E., Biddlecombe V., et al. 2019. “Effectiveness of Short‐Term Heat Acclimation on Intermittent Sprint Performance With Moderately Trained Females Controlling for Menstrual Cycle Phase.” Frontiers in Physiology 10: 1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrett, A. T. , Goosens N. G., Rehrer N. G., Patterson M. J., and Cotter J. D.. 2009. “Induction and Decay of Short‐Term Heat Acclimation.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 107: 659–670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrett, A. T. , Goosens N. G., Rehrer N. J., et al. 2014. “Short‐Term Heat Acclimation Is Effective and May Be Enhanced Rather Than Impaired by Dehydration.” American Journal of Human Biology 26: 311–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gelman, A. 2006. “Prior Distributions for Variance Parameters in Hierarchical Models (Comment on Article by Browne and Draper).” Bayesian Analysis 1: 515–533. [Google Scholar]
- Gerrett, N. , Alkemade P., and Daanen H.. 2021. “Heat Reacclimation Using Exercise or Hot Water Immersion.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 53: 1517–1528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, O. R. , Mee J. A., Taylor L., Tuttle J. A., Watt P. W., and Maxwell N. S.. 2015. “Isothermic and Fixed‐Intensity Heat Acclimation Methods Elicit Equal Increases in Hsp72 mRNA.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 25, no. Suppl 1: 259–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, O. R. , Mee J. A., Tuttle J. A., Taylor L., Watt P. W., and Maxwell N. S.. 2015. “Isothermic and Fixed Intensity Heat Acclimation Methods Induce Similar Heat Adaptation Following Short and Long‐Term Timescales.” Journal of Thermal Biology 49‐50: 55–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, O. R. , Turner G., Tuttle J. A., Taylor L., Watt P. W., and Maxwell N. S.. 2015. “Heat Acclimation Attenuates Physiological Strain and the HSP72, but Not HSP90α, mRNA Response to Acute Normobaric Hypoxia.” Journal of Applied Physiology 119: 889–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Givoni, B. , and Goldman R. F.. 1973. “Predicting Effects of Heat Acclimatization on Heart Rate and Rectal Temperature.” Journal of Applied Physiology 35: 875–879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gore, C. J. , Hopkins W. G., and Burge C. M.. 2005. “Errors of Measurement for Blood Volume Parameters: A Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Applied Physiology 99: 1745–1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenleaf, J. E. , Brock P. J., Keil L. C., and Morse J. T.. 1983. “Drinking and Water Balance During Exercise and Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 54: 414–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenleaf, J. E. , Brock P. J., Sciaraffa D., Polese A., and Elizondo R.. 1985. “Effects of Exercise‐Heat Acclimation on Fluid, Electrolyte, and Endocrine Responses During Tilt and +Gz Acceleration in Women and Men.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 56: 683–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenleaf, J. E. , Sciaraffa D., Shvartz E., Keil L. C., and Brock P. J.. 1981. “Exercise Training Hypotension: Implications for Plasma Volume, Renin, and Vasopressin.” Journal of Applied Physiology 51: 298–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griefahn, B. 1997. “Acclimation to Three Different Hot Climates With Equivalent Wet Bulb Globe Temperatures.” Ergonomics 40: 223–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guy, J. H. , Pyne D. B., Deakin G. B., Miller C. M., and Edwards A. M.. 2016. “Acclimation Training Improves Endurance Cycling Performance in the Heat Without Inducing Endotoxemia.” Frontiers in Physiology 7: 318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hahn, A. G. , Tumilty D., Telford R. D., Parker A., and Di Michiel T.. 1986. “Acclimatisation of Volleyball Players to Humid Heat—Preparation for Competition in Bangkok.” Excel 3: 6–10. [Google Scholar]
- Hannan, F. M. , Leow M. K., Lee J. K., et al. 2024. “Endocrine Effects of Heat Exposure and Relevance to Climate Change.” Nature reviews. Endocrinology 20: 673–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson, E. D. , Cooke M. B., Anderson M. J., Gerber T., Danaher J. A., and Stathis C. G.. 2022. “Heat Acclimation With or Without Normobaric Hypoxia Exposure Leads to Similar Improvements in Endurance Performance in the Heat.” Sports 10: 69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haroutounian, A. , Amorim F. T., Astorino T. A., et al. 2021. “Change in Exercise Performance and Markers of Acute Kidney Injury Following Heat Acclimation With Permissive Dehydration.” Nutrients 13: 841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, M. , Edwards R., Graveney M., Cochrane L. A., and Davies J.. 1981. “Blood Volume and Plasma Protein Responses to Heat Acclimatization in Humans.” Journal of Applied Physiology 50: 597–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, M. H. 1985. “Effects on Thermal Stress and Exercise on Blood Volume in Humans.” Physiological Reviews 65: 149–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasday, J. D. , Thompson C., and Singh I. S.. 2014. “Fever, Immunity, and Molecular Adaptations.” Comprehensive Physiology 4: 109–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayden, G. , Milne H. C., Patterson M. J., and Nimmo M. A.. 2004. “The Reproducibility of Closed‐Pouch Sweat Collection and Thermoregulatory Responses to Exercise–Heat Stress.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 91: 748–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heled, Y. , Peled A., Yanovich R., et al. 2012. “Heat Acclimation and Performance in Hypoxic Conditions.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 83: 649–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hertig, B. A. , and Sargent F. 2nd. 1963. “Acclimatization of Women During Work in Hot Environments.” Federation Proceedings 22: 810–813. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higgins, J. T. J. , Chandler J., Cumpston M., Li T., Page M. J., and Welch V. A.. 2008. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Hodge, D. , Jones D., Martinez R., and Buono M. J.. 2013. “Time Course of the Attenuation of Sympathetic Nervous Activity During Active Heat Acclimation.” Autonomic Neuroscience 177: 101–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hom, L. L. , Lee E. C.‐H., Apicella J. M., et al. 2012. “Eleven Days of Moderate Exercise and Heat Exposure Induces Acclimation Without Significant HSP70 and Apoptosis Responses of Lymphocytes in College‐Aged Males.” Cell Stress and Chaperones 17: 29–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins, W. G. 2004. “How to Interpret Changes in an Athletic Performance Test.” Sportscience 8: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Horowitz, M. 2014. “Heat Acclimation, Epigenetics, and Cytoprotection Memory.” Comprehensive Physiology 4: 199–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horstman, D. H. , and Christensen E.. 1982. “Acclimatization to Dry Heat: Active Men vs. Active Women.” Journal of Applied Physiology 52: 825–831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horvath, S. , and Shelley W.. 1946. “Acclimatization to Extreme Heat and Its Effect on the Ability to Work in Less Severe Environments.” American Journal of Physiology 146: 336–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houmard, J. A. , Costill D. L., Davis J. A., Mitchell J. B., Pascoe D. D., and Robergs R. A.. 1990. “The Influence of Exercise Intensity on Heat Acclimation in Trained Subjects.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 22: 615–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu, M. , and Lin W.. 2012. “Effects of Exercise Training on Red Blood Cell Production: Implications for Anemia.” Acta Haematologica 127: 156–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inoue, Y. , Havenith G., Kenney W. L., Loomis J. L., and Buskirk E. R.. 1999. “Exercise‐ and Methylcholine‐Induced Sweating Responses in Older and Younger Men: Effect of Heat Acclimation and Aerobic Fitness.” International Journal of Biometeorology 42: 210–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- James, C. A. , Richardson A. J., Watt P. W., Willmott A. G., Gibson O. R., and Maxwell N. S.. 2017. “Short‐Term Heat Acclimation Improves the Determinants of Endurance Performance and 5‐km Running Performance in the Heat.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 42: 285–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- James, C. A. , Richardson A. J., Watt P. W., Willmott A. G., Gibson O. R., and Maxwell N. S.. 2018. “Short‐Term Heat Acclimation and Precooling, Independently and Combined, Improve 5‐km Time Trial Performance in the Heat.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 32: 1366–1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jansen, P. , Joosten E., and Vingerhoets H.. 1990. “Muscle Cramp: Main Theories as to Aetiology.” European Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 239: 337–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joy, R. J. , Poe R. H., Davis T. R., and Frohlich E. D.. 1964. “The Effect of Prior Heat Acclimatization Upon Military Performance in Hot Climates.” Military Medicine 129: 51–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaldur, T. , Kals J., Ööpik V., et al. 2013. “Heat Acclimation Increases Arterial Elasticity in Young Men.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 38: 922–927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaldur, T. , Kals J., Ööpik V., et al. 2014. “Effects of Heat Acclimation on Changes in Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Caused by Endurance Capacity Test in the Heat.” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2014: 107137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaufman, F. L. , Mills D. E., Hughson R. L., and Peake G. T.. 1988. “Effects of Bromocriptine on Sweat Gland Function During Heat Acclimatization.” Hormone Research 29: 31–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keiser, S. , Flück D., Hüppin F., Stravs A., Hilty M. P., and Lundby C.. 2015. “Heat Training Increases Exercise Capacity in Hot but Not in Temperate Conditions: A Mechanistic Counter‐Balanced Cross‐Over Study.” American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology 309: 750–761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly, M. , Gastin P. B., Dwyer D. B., Sostaric S., and Snow R. J.. 2016. “Short Duration Heat Acclimation in Australian Football Players.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 15: 118–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly, M. K. , Bowe S. J., Jardine W. T., et al. 2023. “Heat Adaptation for Females: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Physiological Adaptations and Exercise Performance in the Heat.” Sports Medicine 53, no. 7: 1395–1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kerslake, D. M. 1972. The Stress of Hot Environments. Cambridge University Press. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King, D. S. , Costill D. L., Fink W. J., Hargreaves M., and Fielding R. A.. 1985. “Muscle Metabolism During Exercise in the Heat in Unacclimatized and Acclimatized Humans.” Journal of Applied Physiology 59: 1350–1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirby, C. R. , and Convertino V.. 1986. “Plasma Aldosterone and Sweat Sodium Concentrations After Exercise and Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 61: 967–970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirby, N. V. , Lucas S. J. E., and Lucas R. A. I.. 2019. “Nine‐, But Not Four‐Days Heat Acclimation Improves Self‐Paced Endurance Performance in Females.” Frontiers in Physiology 10: 539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirwan, J. P. , Costill D. L., Kuipers H., et al. 1987. “Substrate Utilization in Leg Muscle of Men After Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 63: 31–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kissling, L. S. , Akerman A. P., Campbell H. A., et al. 2022. “A Crossover Control Study of Three Methods of Heat Acclimation on the Magnitude and Kinetics of Adaptation.” Experimental Physiology 107: 337–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kjellberg, S. R. , Rudhe U., and Sjöstrand T.. 1949. “Increase of the Amount of Hemoglobin and Blood Volume in Connection With Physical Training.” Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 19: 146–151. [Google Scholar]
- Klous, L. , De Ruiter C., Alkemade P., Daanen H., and Gerrett N.. 2020. “Sweat Rate and Sweat Composition During Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Thermal Biology 93: 102697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klous, L. , de Ruiter C., Alkemade P., Daanen H., and Gerrett N.. 2021. “Sweat Rate and Sweat Composition Following Active or Passive Heat Re‐Acclimation: A Pilot Study.” Temperature 8: 90–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotze, H. F. , van der Walt W. H., Rogers G. G., and Strydom N. B.. 1977. “Effects of Plasma Ascorbic Acid Levels on Heat Acclimatization in Man.” Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology 42: 711–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kristal‐Boneh, E. , Glusman J., Shitrit R., Chaemovitz C., and Cassuto Y.. 1995. “Physical Performance and Heat Tolerance After Chronic Water Loading and Heat Acclimation.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 66: 733–738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuennen, M. , Gillum T., Dokladny K., Bedrick E., Schneider S., and Moseley P.. 2011. “Thermotolerance and Heat Acclimation May Share a Common Mechanism in Humans.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 301: R524–R533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laitano, O. , Leon L. R., Roberts W. O., and Sawka M. N.. 2019. “Controversies in Exertional Heat Stroke Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment.” Journal of Applied Physiology 127: 1338–1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Law, M. , Stewart D., Letts L., Pollock N., Bosch J., and Westmorland M.. 1998. Guidelines for Critical Review of Qualitative Studies. McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence‐Based Practice Research Group. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, B. J. , Miller A., James R. S., and Thake C. D.. 2016. “Cross Acclimation Between Heat and Hypoxia: Heat Acclimation Improves Cellular Tolerance and Exercise Performance in Acute Normobaric Hypoxia.” Frontiers in Physiology 7: 78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, B. J. , and Thake C. D.. 2017. “Heat and Hypoxic Acclimation Increase Monocyte Heat Shock Protein 72 but do Not Attenuate Inflammation Following Hypoxic Exercise.” Frontiers in Physiology 8: 811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levy, E. , Hasin Y., Navon G., and Horowitz M.. 1997. “Chronic Heat Improves Mechanical and Metabolic Response of Trained Rat Heart on Ischemia and Reperfusion.” American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology 272: H2085–H2094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman, D. E. 2015. “Human Locomotion and Heat Loss: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Comprehensive Physiology 5: 99–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lind, A. R. , and Bass D. E.. 1963. “Optimal Exposure Time for Development of Acclimatization to Heat.” Federation Proceedings 22: 704–708. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loeppky, J. 2015. “Plasma Volume After Heat Acclimation: Variations due to Season, Fitness and Methods of Measurement.” Acta Physiologica Hungarica 102: 282–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lorenzo, S. , Halliwill J. R., Sawka M. N., and Minson C. T.. 2010. “Heat Acclimation Improves Exercise Performance.” Journal of Applied Physiology 109: 1140–1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lorenzo, S. , and Minson C. T.. 2010. “Heat Acclimation Improves Cutaneous Vascular Function and Sweating in Trained Cyclists.” Journal of Applied Physiology 109: 1736–1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lundby, C. , Gassmann M., and Pilegaard H.. 2006. “Regular Endurance Training Reduces the Exercise Induced HIF‐1α and HIF‐2α mRNA Expression in Human Skeletal Muscle in Normoxic Conditions.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 96: 363–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lundby, C. , Hamarsland H., Hansen J., et al. 2023. “Hematological, Skeletal Muscle fiber, and Exercise Performance Adaptations to Heat Training in Elite Female and Male Cyclists.” Journal of Applied Physiology 135: 217–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lundby, C. , Svendsen I. S., Urianstad T., Hansen J., and Rønnestad B. R.. 2021. “Training Wearing Thermal Clothing and Training in Hot Ambient Conditions Are Equally Effective Methods of Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 24: 763–767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch, G. P. , Mavros Y., and Jay O.. 2024. “Quantifying the Time‐Course of Changes in Maximal Skin Wettedness With 7 Days of Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 138, no. 1: 136–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magalhães, F. C. , Amorim F. T., Passos R. L. F., et al. 2010. “Heat and Exercise Acclimation Increases Intracellular Levels of Hsp72 and Inhibits Exercise‐Induced Increase in Intracellular and Plasma Hsp72 in Humans.” Cell Stress and Chaperones 15: 885–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mang, Z. A. , Fennel Z. J., Realzola R. A., et al. 2021. “Heat Acclimation During Low‐Intensity Exercise Increases and Hsp72, but Not Markers of Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Oxidative Phosphorylation, in Skeletal Tissue.” Experimental Physiology 106: 290–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masuda, Y. J. , Parsons L. A., Spector J. T., et al. 2024. “Impacts of Warming on Outdoor Worker Well‐Being in the Tropics and Adaptation Options.” One Earth 7: 382–400. [Google Scholar]
- Matias, A. A. , Albin I. F., Glickman L., et al. 2023. “Impact of High Intensity Interval Exercise With and Without Heat Stress on Cardiovascular and Aerobic Performance: A Pilot Study.” BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 15: 83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCleave, E. L. , Slattery K. M., Duffield R., et al. 2020. “Concurrent Heat and Intermittent Hypoxic Training: No Additional Performance Benefit Over Temperate Training.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 15: 1260–1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCleave, E. L. , Slattery K. M., Duffield R., et al. 2019. “Impaired Heat Adaptation From Combined Heat Training and “Live High, Train Low” Hypoxia.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 14: 635–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCleave, E. L. , Slattery K. M., Duffield R., et al. 2017. “Temperate Performance Benefits After Heat, but Not Combined Heat and Hypoxic Training.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 49: 509–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McClung, J. P. , Hasday J. D., He J.‐r., et al. 2008. “Exercise‐Heat Acclimation in Humans Alters Baseline Levels and Ex Vivo Heat Inducibility of HSP72 and HSP90 in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.” American Journal of Physiology, Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 294: R185–R191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGlynn, M. L. , Collins C., Hailes W., Ruby B., and Slivka D.. 2022. “Heat Acclimation in Females Does Not Limit Aerobic Exercise Training Outcomes.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 5554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIntyre, R. D. , Zurawlew M. J., Mee J. A., Walsh N. P., and Oliver S. J.. 2022. “A Comparison of Medium‐Term Heat Acclimation by Post‐Exercise Hot Water Immersion or Exercise in the Heat: Adaptations, Overreaching, and Thyroid Hormones.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 323: R601–R615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIntyre, R. D. , Zurawlew M. J., Oliver S. J., Cox A. T., Mee J. A., and Walsh N. P.. 2021. “A Comparison of Heat Acclimation by Post‐Exercise Hot Water Immersion and Exercise in the Heat.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 24: 729–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKay, A. K. , Stellingwerff T., Smith E. S., et al. 2022. “Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 17: 317–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLellan, T. M. , and Aoyagi Y.. 1996. “Heat Strain in Protective Clothing Following Hot‐Wet or Hot‐Dry Heat Acclimation.” Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology 21: 90–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mee, J. A. , Gibson O. R., Doust J., and Maxwell N. S.. 2015. “A Comparison of Males and Females' Temporal Patterning to Short‐ and Long‐Term Heat Acclimation.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 25, no. Suppl 1: 250–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mee, J. A. , Gibson O. R., Tuttle J. A., et al. 2016. “Leukocyte Hsp72 mRNA Transcription Does Not Differ Between Males and Females During Heat Acclimation.” Temperature 3: 549–556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikkelsen, C. J. , Junge N., Piil J. F., et al. 2019. “Prolonged Heat Acclimation and Aerobic Performance in Endurance Trained Athletes.” Frontiers in Physiology 10: 1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, D. , Senay L., Wyndham C., Van Rensburg A., Rogers G., and Strydom N.. 1976. “Acclimatization in a Hot, Humid Environment: Energy Exchange, Body Temperature, and Sweating.” Journal of Applied Physiology 40: 768–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, K. M. , Salgado R. M., Bradbury K. E., Charkoudian N., Kenefick R. W., and Cheuvront S. N.. 2021. “Heat Acclimation Improves Heat Tolerance Test Specificity in a Criteria‐Dependent Manner.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 53: 1050–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moher, D. , Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., and PRISMA Group . 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” Annals of Internal Medicine 151: 264–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molloy, J. M. , Smith J. E. W., and Pascoe D. D.. 2013. “Age‐Related Responses Among Adult Males to a 14 Day High Intensity Exercise‐Heat Acclimation Protocol.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 14: 103–118. [Google Scholar]
- Montero, D. , Breenfeldt‐Andersen A., Oberholzer L., et al. 2017. “Erythropoiesis With Endurance Training: Dynamics and Mechanisms.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 312: R894–R902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montero, D. , Rauber S., Goetze J. P., and Lundby C.. 2016. “Reduction in Central Venous Pressure Enhances Erythropoietin Synthesis: Role of Volume‐Regulating Hormones.” Acta Physiologica 218: 89–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mornas, A. , Brocherie F., Guilhem G., et al. 2023. “Active Heat Acclimation Does Not Alter Muscle‐Tendon Unit Properties.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 55: 1076–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moss, J. N. , Bayne F. M., Castelli F., et al. 2020. “Short‐Term Isothermic Heat Acclimation Elicits Beneficial Adaptations but Medium‐Term Elicits a More Complete Adaptation.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 120: 243–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray, K. O. , Brant J. O., Spradlin R. A., et al. 2024. “Exertional Heat Stroke Causes Long‐Term Skeletal Muscle Epigenetic Reprogramming, Altered Gene Expression, and Impaired Satellite Cell Function in Mice.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 326: R160–R175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray, K. O. , Clanton T. L., and Horowitz M.. 2022. “Epigenetic Responses to Heat: From Adaptation to Maladaptation.” Experimental Physiology 107: 1144–1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naito, T. , Haramura M., Muraishi K., Yamazaki M., and Takahashi H.. 2022. “Cooling During Short‐Term Heat Acclimation Enhances Aerobic Capacity but Not Sweat Capacity.” European Journal of Sport Science 22: 579–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neal, R. A. , Corbett J., Massey H. C., and Tipton M. J.. 2016. “Effect of Short‐Term Heat Acclimation With Permissive Dehydration on Thermoregulation and Temperate Exercise Performance.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 26: 875–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neal, R. A. , Massey H. C., Tipton M. J., Young J. S., and Corbett J.. 2016. “Effect of Permissive Dehydration on Induction and Decay of Heat Acclimation, and Temperate Exercise Performance.” Frontiers in Physiology 7: 564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neufer, P. D. , Young A. J., and Sawka M. N.. 1989. “Gastric Emptying During Exercise: Effects of Heat Stress and Hypohydration.” European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 58: 433–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, B. , Hales J., Strange S., Christensen N. J., Warberg J., and Saltin B.. 1993. “Human Circulatory and Thermoregulatory Adaptations With Heat Acclimation and Exercise in a Hot, Dry Environment.” Journal of Physiology 460: 467–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, B. , Strange S., Christensen N. J., Warberg J., and Saltin B.. 1997. “Acute and Adaptive Responses in Humans to Exercise in a Warm, Humid Environment.” Pflügers Archiv 434: 49–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Notley, S. R. , Taylor E. A., Ohnishi N., and Taylor N. A.. 2018. “Cutaneous Vasomotor Adaptation Following Repeated, Isothermal Heat Exposures: Evidence of Adaptation Specificity.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 43: 415–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oberholzer, L. , Siebenmann C., Mikkelsen C. J., et al. 2019. “Hematological Adaptations to Prolonged Heat Acclimation in Endurance‐Trained Males.” Frontiers in Physiology 10: 1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oöpik, V. , Timpmann S., Kreegipuu K., Unt E., and Tamm M.. 2014. “Heat Acclimation Decreases the Growth Hormone Response to Acute Constant‐Load Exercise in the Heat.” Growth Hormone and IGF Research 24: 2–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osborne, J. O. , Stewart I. B., Borg D. N., Beagley K. W., Buhmann R. L., and Minett G. M.. 2021. “Short‐Term Heat Acclimation Preserves Knee Extensor Torque but Does Not Improve 20 km Self‐Paced Cycling Performance in the Heat.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 121: 2761–2772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Toole, M. L. , Paolone A. M., Ramsey R. E., and Irion G.. 1983. “Effects of Heat Acclimation on Plasma Volume and Plasma Protein of Females.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 4: 40–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Page, M. J. , McKenzie J. E., Bossuyt P. M., et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” International Journal of Surgery 88: 105906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandolf, K. 1998. “Time Course of Heat Acclimation and Its Decay.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 19: 157–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandolf, K. , Burse R., and Goldman R.. 1977. “Role of Physical Fitness in Heat Acclimatisation, Decay and Reinduction.” Ergonomics 20: 399–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandolf, K. B. , Cadarette B. S., Sawka M. N., Young A. J., Francesconi R. P., and Gonzalez R. R.. 1988. “Thermoregulatory Responses of Middle‐Aged and Young Men During Dry‐Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 65: 65–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandolf, K. B. , and Kamon E.. 1974. “Respiratory Responses to Intermittent and Prolonged Exercise in a Hot‐Dry Environment.” Life Sciences 14: 187–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parsons, I. T. , Snape D., O'Hara J., et al. 2020. “Echocardiographic Changes Following Active Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Thermal Biology 93: 102705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, M. J. , Stocks J. M., and Taylor N. A.. 2004b. “Sustained and Generalized Extracellular Fluid Expansion Following Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Physiology 559: 327–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, M. J. , Stocks J. M., and Taylor N. A.. 2014. “Whole‐Body Fluid Distribution in Humans During Dehydration and Recovery, Before and After Humid‐Heat Acclimation Induced Using Controlled Hyperthermia.” Acta Physiologica 210: 899–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, M. J. , Stocks J. M., and Taylor N. A. S.. 2004a. “Humid Heat Acclimation Does Not Elicit a Preferential Sweat Redistribution Toward the Limbs.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 286: 512–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peel, J. S. , McNarry M. A., Heffernan S. M., Nevola V. R., Kilduff L. P., and Waldron M.. 2022. “Measurement of Thermal Sweating at Rest and Steady‐State Exercise in Healthy Adults: Inter‐Day Reliability and Relationships With Components of Partitional Calorimetry.” PLoS One 17: e0278652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Périard, J. , Nichols D., Travers G., et al. 2024. “Impact of Exercise Heat Acclimation on Performance in Hot, Cool and Hypoxic Conditions.” Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 6: 275–287. [Google Scholar]
- Périard, J. D. , Cramer M. N., Chapman P. G., Caillaud C., and Thompson M. W.. 2011. “Cardiovascular Strain Impairs Prolonged Self‐Paced Exercise in the Heat.” Experimental Physiology 96: 134–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Périard, J. D. , DeGroot D., and Jay O.. 2022. “Exertional Heat Stroke in Sport and the Military: Epidemiology and Mitigation.” Experimental Physiology 107: 1111–1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Périard, J. D. , Eijsvogels T. M. H., and Daanen H. A. M.. 2021. “Exercise Under Heat Stress: Thermoregulation, Hydration, Performance Implications and Mitigation Strategies.” Physiological Reviews 101: 1873–1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Périard, J. D. , Girard O., Townsend N., et al. 2023. “Hematological Adaptations Following a Training Camp in Hot and/or Hypoxic Conditions in Elite Rugby Union Players.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 18: 1053–1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Périard, J. D. , Pyne D. B., Bishop D. J., Wallett A., and Girard O.. 2020. “Short‐Term Repeated‐Sprint Training in Hot and Cool Conditions Similarly Benefits Performance in Team‐Sport Athletes.” Frontiers in Physiology 11: 1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Périard, J. D. , Racinais S., and Sawka M. N.. 2015. “Adaptations and Mechanisms of Human Heat Acclimation: Applications for Competitive Athletes and Sports.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 25: 20–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Périard, J. D. , Travers G. J. S., Racinais S., and Sawka M. N.. 2016. “Cardiovascular Adaptations Supporting Human Exercise‐Heat Acclimation.” Autonomic Neuroscience 196: 52–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen, C. J. , Portus M. R., Pyne D. B., Dawson B. T., Cramer M. N., and Kellett A. D.. 2010. “Partial Heat Acclimation in Cricketers Using a 4‐Day High Intensity Cycling Protocol.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 5: 535–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pethick, W. A. , Murray H. J., McFadyen P., Brodie R., Gaul C. A., and Stellingwerff T.. 2019. “Effects of Hydration Status During Heat Acclimation on Plasma Volume and Performance.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 29: 189–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Philp, C. P. , Buchheit M., Kitic C. M., Minson C. T., and Fell J. W.. 2017. “Does Short‐Duration Heat Exposure at a Matched Cardiovascular Intensity Improve Intermittent‐Running Performance in a Cool Environment?” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 12: 812–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Philp, C. P. , Pitchford N. W., Visentin D. C., et al. 2022. “Can Ten Days of Heat Acclimation Training Improve Temperate‐Condition Rowing Performance in National‐Level Rowers?” PLoS One 17: e0273909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pichan, G. , Sridharan K., Swamy Y. V., Joseph S., and Gautam R. K.. 1985. “Physiological Acclimatization to Heat After a Spell of Cold Conditioning in Tropical Subjects.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 56: 436–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piepoli, M. , Coats A., Adamopoulos S., et al. 1993. “Persistent Peripheral Vasodilation and Sympathetic Activity in Hypotension After Maximal Exercise.” Journal of Applied Physiology 75: 1807–1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piil, J. F. , Mikkelsen C. J., Junge N., Morris N. B., and Nybo L.. 2019. “Heat Acclimation Does Not Protect Trained Males From Hyperthermia‐Induced Impairments in Complex Task Performance.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poh, P. , Armstrong L. E., Casa D. J., et al. 2012. “Orthostatic Hypotension After 10 d of Exercise‐Heat Acclimation and 28 h of Sleep Loss.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 83: 403–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poirier, M. P. , Gagnon D., Friesen B. J., Hardcastle S. G., and Kenny G. P.. 2015. “Whole‐Body Heat Exchange During Heat Acclimation and Its Decay.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 47: 390–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poirier, M. P. , Gagnon D., and Kenny G. P.. 2016. “Local Versus Whole‐Body Sweating Adaptations Following 14 d of Traditional Heat Acclimation.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 41: 816–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pryor, J. L. , Pryor R. R., Vandermark L. W., et al. 2019. “Intermittent Exercise‐Heat Exposures and Intense Physical Activity Sustain Heat Acclimation Adaptations.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 22: 117–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pryor, R. R. , Pryor J. L., Vandermark L. W., et al. 2021. “Short Term Heat Acclimation Reduces Heat Strain During a First, but Not Second, Consecutive Exercise‐Heat Exposure.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 24: 768–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pryor, R. R. , Pryor J. L., Vandermark L. W., et al. 2020. “Acute Kidney Injury Biomarker Responses to Short‐Term Heat Acclimation.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17: 1325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team . 2009. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
- Racinais, S. , Alonso J.‐M., Coutts A. J., et al. 2015. “Consensus Recommendations on Training and Competing in the Heat.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 25: 6–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Racinais, S. , Hosokawa Y., Akama T., et al. 2023. “IOC Consensus Statement on Recommendations and Regulations for Sport Events in the Heat.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 57: 8–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Racinais, S. , Nichols D., Townsend N., et al. 2024. “Hematological Adaptations to Training With and Without Heat.” Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 6: 265–274. [Google Scholar]
- Racinais, S. , Périard J. D., Piscione J., et al. 2021. “Intensified Training Supersedes the Impact of Heat and/or Altitude for Increasing Ierformance in Elite Rugby Union Players.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 16: 1416–1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Racinais, S. , Wilson M. G., and Périard J. D.. 2017. “Passive Heat Acclimation Improves Skeletal Muscle Contractility in Humans.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 312: R101–R107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radakovic, S. S. , Maric J., Surbatovic M., et al. 2007. “Effects of Acclimation on Cognitive Performance in Soldiers During Exertional Heat Stress.” Military Medicine 172: 133–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravanelli, N. , Coombs G., Imbeault P., and Jay O.. 2019. “Thermoregulatory Adaptations With Progressive Heat Acclimation Are Predominantly Evident in Uncompensable, but Not Compensable, Conditions.” Journal of Applied Physiology 127: 1095–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravanelli, N. , Coombs G. B., Imbeault P., and Jay O.. 2018. “Maximum Skin Wettedness After Aerobic Training With and Without Heat Acclimation.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 50: 299–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravanelli, N. , Gendron P., and Gagnon D.. 2021. “Revisiting the Evaluation of Central Versus Peripheral Thermoregulatory Control in Humans.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 321: R91–R99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reeve, T. , Gordon R., Laursen P. B., Lee J. K. W., and Tyler C. J.. 2019. “Impairment of Cycling Capacity in the Heat in Well‐Trained Endurance Athletes After High‐Intensity Short‐Term Heat Acclimation.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 14: 1058–1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regan, J. , Macfarlane D., and Taylor N.. 1996. “An Evaluation of the Role of Skin Temperature During Heat Adaptation.” Acta Physiologica 158: 365–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reimers, A. K. , Knapp G., and Reimers C.‐D.. 2018. “Effects of Exercise on the Resting Heart Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Interventional Studies.” Journal of Clinical Medicine 7: 503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Relf, R. , Eichhorn G., Waldock K., Flint M. S., Beale L., and Maxwell N.. 2020. “Validity of a Wearable Sweat Rate Monitor and Routine Sweat Analysis Techniques Using Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Thermal Biology 90: 102577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rendell, R. A. , Prout J., Costello J. T., et al. 2017. “Effects of 10 D of Separate Heat and Hypoxic Exposure on Heat Acclimation and Temperate Exercise Performance.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 313: R191–R201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richter, E. A. 1984. “Influence of the Sympatho‐Adrenal Symtem on Some Metabolic and Hormonal Responses to Exercise in the Rat. With Special Reference to the Effect on Glycogenolysis in Skeletal Muscle.” Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 528: 1–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivas, E. , Rao M., Castleberry T., and Ben‐Ezra V.. 2017. “The Change in Metabolic Heat Production Is a Primary Mediator of Heat Acclimation in Adults.” Journal of Thermal Biology 70: 69–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rohatgi, A. 2020. “Webplotdigitizer: Version 4.5.” https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer.
- Romanovsky, A. A. 2018. “The Thermoregulation System and How It Works.” Handbook of Clinical Neurology 156: 3–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rønnestad, B. R. , Hamarsland H., Hansen J., et al. 2021. “Five Weeks of Heat Training Increases Haemoglobin Mass in Elite Cyclists.” Experimental Physiology 106: 316–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rønnestad, B. R. , Hansen J., Bonne T. C., and Lundby C.. 2021. “Case Report: Heat Suit Training May Increase Hemoglobin Mass in Elite Athletes.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 17: 115–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rønnestad, B. R. , Urianstad T., Hamarsland H., et al. 2022. “Heat Training Efficiently Increases and Maintains Haemoglobin Mass and Temperate Endurance Performance in Elite Cyclists.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 54: 1515–1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roussey, G. , Bernard T., Fontanari P., and Louis J.. 2021. “Heat Acclimation Training With Intermittent and Self‐Regulated Intensity May Be Used as an Alternative to Traditional Steady State and Power‐Regulated Intensity in Endurance Cyclists.” Journal of Thermal Biology 98: 102935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowell, L. B. 1974. “Human Cardiovascular Adjustments to Exercise and Thermal Stress.” Physiological Reviews 54: 75–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowell, L. B. , Kraning K. 2nd, Kennedy J., and Evans T.. 1967. “Central Circulatory Responses to Work in Dry Heat Before and After Acclimatization.” Journal of Applied Physiology 22: 509–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rundqvist, H. , Rullman E., Sundberg C. J., et al. 2009. “Activation of the Erythropoietin Receptor in Human Skeletal Muscle.” European Journal of Endocrinology 161: 427–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saillant, M. M. , Charkoudian N., and Salgado R. M.. 2022. “Individual Variability in Achievement of Short‐Term Heat Acclimation During a Fixed Intensity Protocol.” Journal of Thermal Biology 110: 103373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salgado, R. M. , Coffman K. E., Bradbury K. E., et al. 2020. “Effect of 8 d of Exercise‐Heat Acclimation on Aerobic Exercise Performance of Men in Hypobaric Hypoxia.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 319: R114–R122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sargent, F., 2nd , Smith C. R., and Batterton D. L.. 1965. “Eccrine Sweat Gland Activity in Heat Acclimation.” International Journal of Biometeorology 9: 229–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders, P. U. , Garvican‐Lewis L. A., Chapman R. F., and Périard J. D.. 2019. “Special Environments: Altitude and Heat.” International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism 29: 210–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawka, M. , Pandolf K., Avellini B., and Shapiro Y.. 1983. “Does Heat Acclimation Lower the Rate of Metabolism Elicited by Muscular Exercise?” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 54: 27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawka, M. N. 1996. Thermoregulatory Responses to Acute Exercise‐Heat Stress and Heat Acclimation. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Sawka, M. N. , Convertino V. A., Eichner E. R., Schnieder S. M., and Young A. J.. 2000. “Blood Volume: Importance and Adaptations to Exercise Training, Environmental Stresses, and Trauma/Sickness.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 32: 332–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawka, M. N. , Knowlton R. G., and Critz J. B.. 1979. “Thermal and Circulatory Responses to Repeated Bouts of Prolonged Running.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 11: 177–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawka, M. N. , Leon L. R., Montain S. J., and Sonna L. A.. 2011. “Integrated Physiological Mechanisms of Exercise Performance, Adaptation, and Maladaptation to Heat Stress.” Comprehensive Physiology 1: 1883–1928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawka, M. N. , Wenger C. B., and Pandolf K. B.. 2010. “Thermoregulatory Responses to Acute Exercise‐Heat Stress and Heat Acclimation.” Comprehensive Physiology 1: 157–185. [Google Scholar]
- Sawka, M. N. , Young A. J., Cadarette B. S., Levine L., and Pandolf K. B.. 1985. “Influence of Heat Stress and Acclimation on Maximal Aerobic Power.” European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 53: 294–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schleh, M. W. , Ruby B. C., and Dumke C. L.. 2018. “Short Term Heat Acclimation Reduces Heat Stress, but Is Not Augmented by Dehydration.” Journal of Thermal Biology 78: 227–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, W. , and Prommer N.. 2008. “Effects of Various Training Modalities on Blood Volume.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 18: 57–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmit, C. , Duffield R., Hausswirth C., Brisswalter J., and Le Meur Y.. 2018. “Optimizing Heat Acclimation for Endurance Athletes: High‐ Versus Low‐Intensity Training.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 13: 816–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sekiguchi, Y. , Benjamin C. L., Dion S. O., et al. 2021. “Changes in Hydration Factors Over the Course of Heat Acclimation in Endurance Athletes.” International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism 31: 406–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senay, L. C., Jr. 1978. “Early Response of Plasma Contents on Exposure of Working Men to Heat.” Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology 44: 166–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senay, L. 1979. “Effects of Exercise in the Heat on Body Fluid Distribution.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 11: 42–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senay, L. , and Kok R.. 1977. “Effects of Training and Heat Acclimatization on Blood Plasma Contents of Exercising Men.” Journal of Applied Physiology 43: 591–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senay, L. , Mitchell D., and Wyndham C.. 1976. “Acclimatization in a Hot, Humid Environment: Body Fluid Adjustments.” Journal of Applied Physiology 40: 786–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro, Y. , Hubbard R. W., Kimbrough C. M., and Pandolf K. B.. 1981. “Physiological and Hematologic Responses to Summer and Winter Dry‐Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 50: 792–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro, Y. , Pandolf K. B., and Goldman R. F.. 1980. “Sex Differences in Acclimation to a Hot‐Dry Environment.” Ergonomics 23: 635–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaw, J. , Walkington C., Cole E., et al. 2022. “Effectiveness of Short‐Term Isothermic‐Heat Acclimation (4 d) on Physical Performance in Moderately Trained Males.” PLoS One 17: e0270093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi, J. , Luo D., Wan X., et al. 2023. “Detecting the Skewness of Data From the Sample Size and the Five‐Number Summary.” Statistical Methods in Medical Research 32, no. 7: 1338–1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shvartz, E. , Bhattacharya A., Sperinde S., et al. 1979. “Deconditioning‐Induced Exercise Responses as Influenced by Heat Acclimation.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 50: 893–897. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shvartz, E. , Saar E., Meyerstein N., and Benor D.. 1973. “A Comparison of Three Methods of Acclimatization to Dry Heat.” Journal of Applied Physiology 34: 214–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shvartz, E. , Shapiro Y., Magazanik A., et al. 1977. “Heat Acclimation, Physical Fitness, and Responses to Exercise in Temperate and Hot Environments.” Journal of Applied Physiology 43: 678–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shvartz, E. , Strydom N. B., and Kotze H.. 1975. “Orthostatism and Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 39: 590–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, C. J. , and Havenith G.. 2019. “Upper Body Sweat Mapping Provides Evidence of Relative Sweat Redistribution Towards the Periphery Following Hot‐Dry Heat Acclimation.” Temperature 6: 50–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sotiridis, A. , Debevec T., Ciuha U., Eiken O., and Mekjavic I. B.. 2019. “Heat Acclimation Does Not Affect Maximal Aerobic Power in Thermoneutral Normoxic or Hypoxic Conditions.” Experimental Physiology 104: 345–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stearns, R. L. , Belval L. N., Casa D. J., et al. 2013. “Two Environmental Symptoms Questionnaires During 10 d of Exercise‐Heat Acclimation.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 84: 797–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strydom, N. B. , Kotze H. F., van der Walt W. H., and Rogers G. G.. 1976. “Effect of Ascorbic Acid on Rate of Heat Acclimatization.” Journal of Applied Physiology 41: 202–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sumi, D. , Nagatsuka H., Matsuo K., Okazaki K., and Goto K.. 2022. “Heat Acclimation Does Not Attenuate Hepcidin Elevation After a Single Session of Endurance Exercise Under Hot Condition.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 122: 1965–1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sumi, D. , Nagatsuka H., Matsuo K., Okazaki K., and Goto K.. 2023. “The Impact of Heat Acclimation on Gastrointestinal Function Following Endurance Exercise in a Hot Environment.” Nutrients 15: 216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunderland, C. , Morris J. G., and Nevili M. E.. 2008. “A Heat Acclimation Protocol for Team Sports.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 42: 327–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takamata, A. , Ito T., Yaegashi K., et al. 1999. “Effect of an Exercise‐Heat Acclimation Program on Body Fluid Regulatory Responses to Dehydration in Older Men.” American Journal of Physiology 277: R1041–R1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takeno, Y. , Kamijo Y. I., and Nose H.. 2001. “Thermoregulatory and Aerobic Changes After Endurance Training in a Hypobaric Hypoxic and Warm Environment.” Journal of Applied Physiology 91: 1520–1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamm, M. , Jakobson A., Havik M., et al. 2015. “Effects of Heat Acclimation on Time Perception.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 95: 261–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, N. A. S. 2014. “Human Heat Adaptation.” Comprehensive Physiology 4: 325–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tebeck, S. T. , Buckley J. D., Bellenger C. R., and Stanley J.. 2020. “Differing Physiological Adaptations Induced by Dry and Humid Short‐Term Heat Acclimation.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 15: 133–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trachsel, L. D. , Barry H., Gravel H., Behzadi P., Henri C., and Gagnon D.. 2020. “Cardiac Function During Heat Stress: Impact of Short‐Term Passive Heat Acclimation.” American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology 319: H753–H764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trangmar, S. J. , and González‐Alonso J.. 2019. “Heat, Hydration and the Human Brain, Heart and Skeletal Muscles.” Sports Medicine 49: 69–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Travers, G. , González‐Alonso J., Riding N., Nichols D., Shaw A., and Périard J. D.. 2020. “Exercise Heat Acclimation Has Minimal Effects on Left Ventricular Volumes, Function and Systemic Hemodynamics in Euhydrated and Dehydrated Trained Humans.” American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology 319: H965–H979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Travers, G. , González‐Alonso J., Riding N., Nichols D., Shaw A., and Périard J. D.. 2021. “Exercise Heat Acclimation With Dehydration Does Not Affect Vascular and Cardiac Volumes or Systemic Hemodynamics During Endurance Exercise.” Frontiers in Physiology 12: 740121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Travers, G. , Nichols D., Riding N., González‐Alonso J., and Périard J. D.. 2020. “Heat Acclimation With Controlled Heart Rate: Influence of Hydration Status.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 52: 1815–1824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyler, C. J. , Reeve T., Hodges G. J., and Cheung S. S.. 2016. “The Effects of Heat Adaptation on Physiology, Perception and Exercise Performance in the Heat: A Meta‐Analysis.” Sports Medicine 46: 1699–1724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyler, C. J. , Reeve T., Sieh N., and Cheung S.. 2024. “The Effects of Heat Adaptation on Physiology, Perception, and Exercise Performance in the Heat: An Updated Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 6: 195–217. [Google Scholar]
- Vehtari, A. , Gelman A., Simpson D., Carpenter B., and Bürkner P.‐C.. 2021. “Rank‐Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved R ^ for Assessing Convergence of MCMC (With Discussion).” International Society for Bayesian Analysis 16: 667–718. [Google Scholar]
- Vesić, Z. , Vukasinović‐Vesić M., Dincić D., Surbatović M., and Radaković S. S.. 2013. “The Effects of Acclimatization on Blood Clotting Parameters in Exertional Heat Stress.” Vojnosanitetski Pregled 70: 670–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vickers, A. J. 2001. “The Use of Percentage Change From Baseline as an Outcome in a Controlled Trial Is Statistically Inefficient: A Simulation Study.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 1: 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waldock, K. A. M. , Gibson O. R., Relf R. L., et al. 2021. “Exercise Heat Acclimation and Post‐Exercise Hot Water Immersion Improve Resting and Exercise Responses to Heat Stress in the Elderly.” Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 24: 774–780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waldron, M. , Jeffries O., Tallent J., Patterson S., and Nevola V.. 2019. “The Time Course of Adaptations in Thermoneutral Maximal Oxygen Consumption Following Heat Acclimation.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 119: 2391–2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waldron, M. , Papavasileiou G., Jeffries O., et al. 2020. “Concurrent Adaptations in Maximal Aerobic Capacity, Heat Tolerance, Microvascular Blood Flow and Oxygen Extraction Following Heat Acclimation and Ischemic Preconditioning.” Journal of Thermal Biology 93: 102724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallett, A. , McKune A., Pyne D., et al. 2022. “Repeated‐Sprint Exercise in the Heat Increases Indirect Markers of Gastrointestinal Damage in Well‐Trained Team‐Sport Athletes.” International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism 32: 153–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watkins, A. M. , Cheek D. J., Harvey A. E., Blair K. E., and Mitchell J. B.. 2008. “Heat Acclimation and HSP‐72 Expression in Exercising Humans.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 29: 269–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weller, A. S. , Linnane D. M., Jonkman A. G., and Daanen H. A.. 2007. “Quantification of the Decay and Re‐Induction of Heat Acclimation in Dry‐Heat Following 12 and 26 d Without Exposure to Heat Stress.” European Journal of Applied Physiology 102: 57–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werner, J. 1994. “Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Thermal Adaptation.” In Thermal Balance in Health and Disease: Recent Basic Research and Clinical Progress, 141–154. Springer. [Google Scholar]
- White, A. C. , Salgado R. M., Astorino T. A., et al. 2015. “The Effect of 10 d of Heat Acclimation on Exercise Performance in Acute Hypobaric Hypoxia (4350 m).” Temperature 3: 176–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wickham, H. 2016. “ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.” Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 17: 189–201. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, C. G. , and Heyns A. J.. 1969. “Differential Acclimatisation as a Function of Duration of Exposure.” Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie 27: 198–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams, C. G. , Wyndham C. H., and Heyns A.. 1968. “The Problem of “Optimum” Acclimatisation.” Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie 26: 298–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willmott, A. , Gibson O., Hayes M., and Maxwell N.. 2016. “The Effects of Single Versus Twice Daily Short Term Heat Acclimation on Heat Strain and 3000 m Running Performance in Hot, Humid Conditions.” Journal of Thermal Biology 56: 59–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willmott, A. G. B. , Hayes M., Waldock K. A. M., et al. 2017. “Short‐Term Heat Acclimation Prior to a Multi‐Day Desert Ultra‐Marathon Improves Physiological and Psychological Responses Without Compromising Immune Status.” Journal of Sports Sciences 35: 2249–2256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, M. G. , Périard J. D., Adamuz C., Farooq A., Watt V., and Racinais S.. 2020. “Does Passive Heat Acclimation Impact the Athlete's Heart Continuum?” European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 27: 553–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wingfield, G. L. , Gale R., Minett G. M., Marino F. E., and Skein M.. 2016. “The Effect of High Versus Low Intensity Heat Acclimation on Performance and Neuromuscular Responses.” Journal of Thermal Biology 58: 50–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood, J. E. , and Bass D. E.. 1960. “Responses of the Veins and Arterioles of the Forearm to Walking During Acclimatization to Heat in Man.” Journal of Clinical Investigation 39: 825–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wyndham, C. , Benade A., Williams C., Strydom N., Goldin A., and Heyns A.. 1968. “Changes in Central Circulation and Body Fluid Spaces During Acclimatization to Heat.” Journal of Applied Physiology 25: 586–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wyndham, C. , Rogers G., Senay L., and Mitchell D.. 1976. “Acclimization in a Hot, Humid Environment: Cardiovascular Adjustments.” Journal of Applied Physiology 40: 779–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamada, P. M. , Amorim F. T., Moseley P., Robergs R., and Schneider S. M.. 2007. “Effect of Heat Acclimation on Heat Shock Protein 72 and Interleukin‐10 in Humans.” Journal of Applied Physiology 103: 1196–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamazaki, F. 2008. “Short‐Term Heat Acclimation Does Not Alter the Vasodilator Respose in Glabrous Skin During Heat Stress.” Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine 57: 169–174. [Google Scholar]
- Yamazaki, F. , and Hamasaki K.. 2003. “Heat Acclimation Increases Skin Vasodilation and Sweating but Not Cardiac Baroreflex Responses in Heat‐Stressed Humans.” Journal of Applied Physiology 95: 1567–1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young, A. J. , Sawka M. N., Levine L., Cadarette B. S., and Pandolf K. B.. 1985. “Skeletal Muscle Metabolism During Exercise Is Influenced by Heat Acclimation.” Journal of Applied Physiology 59: 1929–1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zappe, D. H. , Bell G. W., Swartzentruber H., Wideman R. F., and Kenney W. L.. 1996. “Age and Regulation of Fluid and Electrolyte Balance During Repeated Exercise Sessions.” American Journal of Physiology 270: R71–R79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S. , and Zhu N.. 2021. “Exercise Heat Acclimation Causes Human Responses and Safety Performance Improvements.” Journal of Thermal Biology 100: 103042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmermann, M. , Landers G., Wallman K., and Kent G.. 2018. “Precooling With Crushed Ice: As Effective as Heat Acclimation at Improving Cycling Time‐Trial Performance in the Heat.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 13: 228–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data S1.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
