Skip to main content
. 2025 May 14;26(6):581–592. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0912

Table 5. Qualitative analysis for PD-TSE FS, 3D-DESS, DESSHR sequences at 7T MRI as assessed by five readers.

Sequence PD-TSE FS 3D-DESS DESSHR P-values
3D-DESS vs. PD-TSE FS DESSHR vs. PD-TSE FS DESSHR vs. 3D-DESS
Overall image quality 4.2 (4.0–4.8) 5 (5.0–5.0) 5 (5.0–5.0) <0.001 <0.001 1.000
Pulsatile flow artifacts 4 (3.2–4.0) 5 (5.0–5.0) 4 (4.0–4.0) <0.001 0.035 <0.001
CPN visualization 4 (4.0–4.2) 4 (3.8–4.0) 5 (4.8–5.0) 0.280 <0.001 <0.001
BPN visualization 3.2 (3.0–3.4) 5 (4.2–5.0) 4.2 (4.0–4.6) <0.001 <0.001 0.042
TN visualization 4 (4.0–4.0) 3.6 (3.2–4.0) 5 (5.0–5.0) 0.017 <0.001 <0.001
SN visualization 3.2 (3.0–4.0) 2 (2.0–2.0) 5 (4.8–5.0) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Data were presented as the median (IQR) of the average values derived from the five grades assigned by the five readers. The Friedman test with pairwise post-hoc Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni-Holm correction was employed. P < 0.05 means a significant difference. PD = proton density, TSE = turbo spin-echo, FS = fat suppression, 3D = three-dimensional, DESS = double echo steady state, DESSHR = means DESS sequence with a high in-plane resolution, 7T = 7 tesla, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, IQR = interquartile range, CPN = common peroneal nerve, BPN = branches of the peroneal nerve, TN = tibial nerve, SN = saphenous nerve