Skip to main content
. 2025 May 30;17:87. doi: 10.1186/s13321-025-01030-3

Table 2.

Performance comparison on USPTO-50 K dataset across different training approaches

Model Initial accuracy (%) ± std Symmetry-aware accuracy (%) ± std
SAMMNet
GIN 88.51 ± 0.07 97.37 ±0.06
GCN 87.18 ± 0.12 95.66 ± 0.08
GraphSAGE 88.20 ± 0.11 97.02 ± 0.05
Vanilla
GIN 87.64 ± 0.09 96.46 ± 0.06
GCN 86.34 ± 0.11 94.89 ± 0.08
GraphSAGE 86.21 ±0.1 95.32 ±0.07
Transfer learning
GIN 86.65 ± 0.1 95.5 ± 0.04
GCN 85.15 ± 0.12 93.73 ± 0.08
GraphSAGE 84.78 ± 0.14 93.87 ± 0.05

Bold values indicate the best-performing results for each evaluation metric