Table 2.
Performance comparison on USPTO-50 K dataset across different training approaches
| Model | Initial accuracy (%) ± std | Symmetry-aware accuracy (%) ± std |
|---|---|---|
| SAMMNet | ||
| GIN | 88.51 ± 0.07 | 97.37 ±0.06 |
| GCN | 87.18 ± 0.12 | 95.66 ± 0.08 |
| GraphSAGE | 88.20 ± 0.11 | 97.02 ± 0.05 |
| Vanilla | ||
| GIN | 87.64 ± 0.09 | 96.46 ± 0.06 |
| GCN | 86.34 ± 0.11 | 94.89 ± 0.08 |
| GraphSAGE | 86.21 ±0.1 | 95.32 ±0.07 |
| Transfer learning | ||
| GIN | 86.65 ± 0.1 | 95.5 ± 0.04 |
| GCN | 85.15 ± 0.12 | 93.73 ± 0.08 |
| GraphSAGE | 84.78 ± 0.14 | 93.87 ± 0.05 |
Bold values indicate the best-performing results for each evaluation metric