Skip to main content
. 2025 May 30;25:192. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04933-8

Table 3.

Lipid profiles of type 2 diabetic rats after being treated with Nipa palm vinegar for 28 days. The group consisted of normal control (NC), diabetic control (DC), 60 mg/kg B.W. Phlorizin (PHZ), and Nipa palm vinegar with doses of 250 mg/kg B.W. (AE250), 500 mg/kg B.W. (AE500), and 1000 mg/kg B.W. (AE1000)

Total concentration (mmol/L)
Group CHOL TG HDL LDL
NC 1.23 ± 0.13** 0.51 ± 0.07** 0.38 ± 0.06* 0.23 ± 0.02**
DC 10.20 ± 6.16## 2.55 ± 0.90## 0.63 ± 0.22# 4.41 ± 3.20##
PHZ 2.39 ± 0.56** 0.68 ± 0.06* 0.57 ± 0.04 0.52 ± 0.15**
AE250 2.26 ± 0.03** 0.53 ± 0.06* 0.42 ± 0.02 0.49 ± 0.03**
AE500 2.39 ± 0.32*# 0.75 ± 0.08* 0.57 ± 0.07 0.53 ± 0.08*#
AE1000 2.20 ± 0.26** 0.86 ± 0.33* 0.56 ± 0.10 0.40 ± 0.03*

Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical significance is indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to DC and #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared to NC. Based on data normality, HDL was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test, while TG, CHOL, and LDL were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Mann-Whitney U post hoc test. CHOL: Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; HDL: High-density lipoprotein; LDL: Low-density lipoprotein