Table 1.

Demographic characteristics, clinical features, and treatment in children with periorbital LMs

Case	Demographic characteristics			Subtypes	symptoms of presentations		previous treatment	Intraoperative fluid volume(ml)	Efficacy evaluation
	Sex	Years	Medical history		Reason for referral	Accompanying symptoms			Initial dimensions of lesion (cm)	Final dimensions of lesion(cm)	Follow up	Outcome
1	F	25 M	15 D	intraorbital + eyelid	intracystic hemorrhage	swelling	none	2	1.3 × 2.3	0.6 × 2	6.5 M	strong
2	F	10Y	7 D	intraorbital	intracystic hemorrhage	swelling, conjunctival congestion, ocular compression	none	2	2.9 × 2.5 × 1.9 (Fig. 2A)	0 (Fig. 2B)	2.5 M	lesion not seen on imaging
3	F	3Y	2 M	intraorbital	intracystic hemorrhage	swelling, ptosis, optic nerve compression	none	5	2.8 × 3.5 × 2.3	2.0 × 2.2 × 1.6	1 M	strong
4	F	11Y	11 Y	eyelid	lesions	swelling	none	0.5	1.1 × 0.6 × 0.5	0.9 × 0.6 × 0.5	1 M	weak
5	F	7Y	5 Y	intraorbital + eyelid	intracystic hemorrhage	swelling	none	3(1st ), 1(2nd ), 1(3rd )	3.2 × 2.2 × 2.1	1.3 × 0.7 × 0.6	1.5 M	strong
6	F	14 M	1 M	intraorbital	intracystic hemorrhage	swelling, proptosis, conjunctival edema, difficulty opening eyes	none	10(1st ), 2(2nd )	2.4 × 1.7 × 1.5	1.8 × 0.7 × 0.6	3 W	strong
7	M	4Y	7 D	intraorbital	intracystic hemorrhage	swelling, proptosis, optic nerve compression, decreased visual acuity, blurred vision	none	0.5(1st ), 0.5(2nd ), 0.5(3rd )	2.5 × 1.8 × 1.3	0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2	4.5 M	strong
8	F	11Y	20 D	eyelid	intracystic hemorrhage	swelling	none	2	3.1 × 2.0 × 1.8	1.4 × 0.6 × 0.4	2.5 M	strong

Note M: male, F: female, Y: year, M: month, W: week, intraorbital: lesions within the orbit (intra- and extra-conal), Follow up: the time interval between last procedure and the follow up imaging