Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 7;47(3):699–707. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01857-0

Table 2.

VTE risk assessment documentation and VTE prophylaxis prescribing guideline compliance pre- and post-intervention

2022 pre-intervention Group (n = 458) 2023 post-intervention group (n = 392) Difference (95% CI) p-value
Rate of VTE risk assessment documentation
Overall 105 (22.9%) 207 (52.8%) 29.9% (23.6–26.1%)  < 0.001
Medical 6 (3.3%) 78 (42.2%) 38.9% (31.3–46.4%)  < 0.001
Surgical 99 (35.9%) 129 (62.3%) 26.4% (17.8–35.1%)  < 0.001
Rate of guideline-compliant VTE prophylaxis prescribing
Overall 255 (55.7%) 273 (69.6%) 13.9% (6.4–14.0%)  < 0.001
Medical 102 (56.0%) 121 (65.4%) 9.4% (− 0.05–19.3%) 0.066
Surgical 153 (55.4%) 152 (73.4%) 18% (9.6–26.4%)  < 0.001
Rate of guideline-compliant pharmacological VTE prophylaxis prescribing
Overall 350 (76.4%) 330 (84.2%) 7.8% (2.5–13.1%) 0.005
Medical 116 (63.7%) 137 (74.1%) 10.4% (0.9–19.7%) 0.033
Surgical 234 (84.7%) 193 (93.2%) 8.5% (3.0–13.9%) 0.004
Rate of guideline-compliant mechanical VTE prophylaxis prescribing
Overall 337 (73.5%) 331 (84.4%) 10.9% (5.5–16.3%)  < 0.001
Medical 168 (92.3%) 168 (90.1%) 2.2% (− 7.2–4.2%) 0.606
Surgical 169 (61.2%) 163 (78.7%) 17.5% (9.5–25.5%)  < 0.001

CI, Confidence interval; VTE, Venous thromboembolism