Table 4.
Results of the implementation fidelity components (recruitment, reach, and dose delivered)
| School A | School B | School C | School D | School E | School F | School G | School H | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment | |||||||||
| Students (GMB1-3) | School coordinator or manager were in charge for recruiting students | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Students participated voluntarily | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| School staff (GMB1-3) | School coordinator or manager were in charge for recruiting school staff | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| School staff participated voluntarily | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |
| Community actors (GMB3) | Recruitment of community actors was a cooperation between the school and the municipality | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| Community actors participated voluntarily | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |
| Reach (number of participants) | |||||||||
| GMB1 | Students | 4 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 13 | 17 |
| Staff | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| Managers | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Municipality | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| GMB2 | Students | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 4 | 13 |
| Staff | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| Managers | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Municipality | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| GMB3 | Students | 8 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 26 | 8 | 11 |
| Staff | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| Managers | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Municipality | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Community actors | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 8 | |
| Dose delivered | |||||||||
| GMB1 | At least two facilitators | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| The script was followed, and aims met | Yes | Yes | Yes | Minor deviations | Minor deviations | Minor deviations | Yes | Yes | |
| The CLD was adjusted after the session | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| GMB2 | At least two facilitators | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| The script was followed, and aims met | Yes | Yes | Yes | Minor deviations | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| The CLD was adjusted after the session | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| GMB3 | At least two facilitators | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| The script was followed, and aims met | Minor deviations | Yes | Yes | Major deviations | Yes | Minor deviations | Yes | Major deviations | |
| The CLD was adjusted after the session | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Implementation fidelity percent (range 0%–100%) | 69.8% | 84.5% | 70.5% | 57.7% | 75.3% | 53.3% | 89.7% | 53.6% | |
Notes: Bold indicates the preferred practice was fulfilled. The implementation percent was calculated by dividing the number of fulfilled preferred practices by the total number of 28 indicators.