Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 20;39(9):1797–1804. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03734-0

Table 2.

Analysis of clinical factors predisposing to achieve a Q8W dosing interval.

Cox model HR 95% CI inf 95% CI sup p
Univariate analysis
Age 1.01 0.95 1.06 0.69
Pseudophakic 1.21 0.28 5.21 0.79
Gender 0.68 0.30 1.53 0.35
Type 2 CNV 2.24 1.07 4.68 0.03
Type 3 CNV 4.64 1.26 17.10 0.02
VA at the time of diagnosis 0.23 0.05 1.04 0.05
ERM at the time of diagnosis 0.99 0.99 1 0.61
SRF height at the time of diagnosis 0.99 0.99 1 0.36
PED height at the time of diagnosis 0.99 0.99 1 0.10
IRF at the time of diagnosis 1.55 0.73 3.29 0.24
CNV surface area at the time of diagnosis 0.97 0.90 1.04 0.46
Atrophy area at the time of diagnosis 1.11 1.02 1.21 0.01
Vitrectomy 1.32 0.4 4.37 0.64
ERM 1.48 0.70 3.09 0.29
Macular hematoma 0.9 0.27 2.97 0.86
Multivariate analysis
Type 2 CNV 1.73 0.78 3.82 0.17
Type 3 CNV 4.55 1.22 16.89 0.02
VA at the time of diagnosis 0.33 0.06 1.71 0.18
Atrophy area at the time of diagnosis 1.09 1 1.20 0.04

Bold values are significant at p ≤ 0,05.