Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1974 Sep;78(1):173–186. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.1.173

Nature and Consequences of Induced Chromosome Damage in Mammals

A G Searle 1
PMCID: PMC1213177  PMID: 4442701

Abstract

There are marked qualitative and quantitative differences in the patterns of chromosomal damage observed after irradiation of spermatogonia, spermatozoa and oocytes of mice. These differences often result from reduced or zero transmission of particular classes of abberration arising in pre-meiotic germ cells. Probably this is the reason why the level of X-chromosomal and autosomal monosomy is not increased after spermatogonial irradiation. Similarly, the reduced transmission of certain d–se deficiencies may help to explain their low F1 frequency after pre-meiotic as compared with later irradiation. Spermatozoal irradiation has revealed no Robertsonian translocations, but has produced some types of reciprocal translocations which apparently are not transmitted to the F1 after spermatogonial treatment because they prevent maturation of the male pre-meiotic germ cell. Thus they cause sterility in males, but not in females. They include X-autosome and Y-autosome translocations, those giving a metacentric or sub-metacentric chromosome (with reciprocal product present) and those in which one break-point is in or near the centromeric heterochromatin while the other is more distally placed. This last group (which grades into male sub-fertile conditions) gives a preponderance of chain configurations (often with one separate univalent) in heterozygotes of both sexes at meiosis and a high incidence of somatic marker chromosomes. Nondisjunction associated with the univalent generates tertiary trisomics, which are usually male-sterile also and may show phenotypic abnormalities. Sterile males with complete separation of X and Y chromosomes have also been reported after mutagenic treatment of meiotic and post-meiotic germ cells. Such separation seems to prevent a primary spermatocyte from forming a secondary one. The usual derivation (in mouse and man) of tertiary trisomics from mothers rather than from fathers may be due to a similar block, together with a general tendency for male heterozygotes for the parental balanced translocation to be sterile or sub-fertile. Mature oocytes tend to resemble spermatoza in the types of aberration produced by irradiation, which include the male-sterile translocation, but more data are needed. Many of the aberrations described contribute to the human cytogenetic load and can be studied in the mouse from this point of view.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (981.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CARTER T. C., LYON M. F., PHILLIPS R. J. Genetic hazard of ionizing radiations. Nature. 1958 Aug 9;182(4632):409–409. doi: 10.1038/182409a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cattanach B. M. A test of distributive pairing between two specific non-homologous chromosomes in the mouse. Cytogenetics. 1967;6(1):67–77. doi: 10.1159/000129930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cattanach B. M., Pollard C. E., Hawker S. G. Sex-reversed mice: XX and XO males. Cytogenetics. 1971;10(5):318–337. doi: 10.1159/000130151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cattanach B. M., Pollard C. E., Isaacson J. H. Ethyl methanesulfonate-induced chromosome breakage in the mouse. Mutat Res. 1968 Sep-Oct;6(2):297–307. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(68)90045-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chandley A. C., Christie S., Fletcher J., Frackiewicz A., Jacobs P. A. Translocation heterozygosity and associated subfertility in man. Cytogenetics. 1972;11(6):516–533. doi: 10.1159/000130218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chandley A. C., Edmond P. Meiotic studies on a subfertile patient with a ring Y chromosome. Cytogenetics. 1971;10(4):295–304. doi: 10.1159/000130149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Boer P. Fertile tertiary trisomy in the mouse (Mus muculus). Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1973;12(6):435–442. doi: 10.1159/000130486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gropp A., Winking H., Zech L., Müller H. Robertsonian chromosomal variation and identification of metacentric chromosomes in feral mice. Chromosoma. 1972;39(3):265–288. doi: 10.1007/BF00290787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hearing V. J. Tyrosinase activity in subcellular fractions of black and albino mice. Nat New Biol. 1973 Sep 19;245(142):81–83. doi: 10.1038/newbio245081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones K. W. Chromosomal and nuclear location of mouse satellite DNA in individual cells. Nature. 1970 Mar 7;225(5236):912–915. doi: 10.1038/225912a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lifschytz E., Lindsley D. L. The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis (Drosophila-allocycly-chromosome evolution-male sterility-dosage compensation). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):182–186. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lyon M. F., Meredith R. Autosomal translocations causing male sterility and viable aneuploidy in the mouse. Cytogenetics. 1966;5(5):335–354. doi: 10.1159/000129909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parker D. R. Heterologous interchange at meiosis in Drosophila. II. Some disjunctional consequences of interchange. Mutat Res. 1969 May-Jun;7(3):393–407. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(69)90110-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Polani P. E. Centromere localization at meiosis and the position of chiasmata in the male and female mouse. Chromosoma. 1972;36(4):343–374. doi: 10.1007/BF00336793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. RUSSELL L. B., RUSSELL W. L. Genetic analysis of induced deletions and of spontaneous nondisjunction involving chromosome 2 of the mouse. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1960 Nov;56(Suppl 1):169–188. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030560415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. RUSSELL W. L. X-ray-induced mutations in mice. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1951;16:327–336. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1951.016.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roderick T. H. Producing and detecting paracentric chromosomal inversions in mice. Mutat Res. 1971 Jan;11(1):59–69. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(71)90032-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Russell L. B. Definition of functional units in a small chromosomal segment of the mouse and its use in interpreting the nature of radiation-induced mutations. Mutat Res. 1971 Jan;11(1):107–123. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(71)90036-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Russell L. B., Montgomery C. S. Comparative studies on X-autosome translocations in the mouse. I. Origin, viability, fertility, and weight of five T(X;1)'S. Genetics. 1969 Sep;63(1):103–120. doi: 10.1093/genetics/63.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SEARLE A. G. GENETIC EFFECTS OF SPERMATOGONIAL X-IRRADIATION ON PRODUCTIVITY OF F1 FEMALE MICE. Mutat Res. 1964 May;106:99–108. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Scowcroft W. R., James A. P. The estimation of intra- and interallelic interaction affecting a quantitative character in yeast. Genetics. 1971 May;68(1):59–66. doi: 10.1093/genetics/68.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Seabright M. The use of proteolytic enzymes for the mapping of structural rearrangements in the chromosomes of man. Chromosoma. 1972;36(2):204–210. doi: 10.1007/BF00285214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Searle A. G., Beechey C. V., Evans E. P., Ford C. E. Studies on the induction of translocations in mouse spermatogonia. V. Effects of short-term fractionation. Mutat Res. 1972 Jun;15(2):169–174. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(72)90029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Searle A. G., Ford C. E., Evans E. P., Beechey C. V., Burtenshaw M. D., Clegg H. M., Papworth D. G. The induction of translocations in mouse spermatozoa. I. Kinetics of dose response with acute x-irradiation. Mutat Res. 1974 Feb;22(2):157–174. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(74)90096-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Snell G D. The Induction by X-Rays of Hereditary Changes in Mice. Genetics. 1935 Nov;20(6):545–567. doi: 10.1093/genetics/20.6.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Woollam D. H., Ford E. H., Millen J. W. The attachment of pachytene chromosomes to the nuclear membrane in mammalian spermatocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1966 Jun;42(3):657–661. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(66)90278-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES