Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1975 May;80(1):157–169. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.1.157

Requirement for Cell Dispersion Prior to Selection of Induced Azaguanine-Resistant Colonies of Chinese Hamster Cells

B C Myhr 1, J A DiPaolo 1
PMCID: PMC1213312  PMID: 1093934

Abstract

With V79 Chinese hamster cell cultures treated with a mutagen, the maximum frequency of colonies resistant to 8-azaguanine (AZG) was attained when the cells were dispersed after a suitable expression time before adding the selection medium. V79–4 cells were exposed to 500 µM MMS, 7 µM AFAA, or 10 µM MNNG and allowed to multiply before being reseeded at 4 x 104 cells/60 mm dish and selected with 10 µg/ml AZG. Maximum frequencies of 4 x 10-5, 4 x 10-4, and 2.4 x 10-3 were obtained about 100, 130, and 200 hrs after exposure to MMS, AFAA, and MNNG, respectively. The maximum frequencies following MMS or MNNG treatments were about 10-fold greater than those obtained when induction and selection of AZG-resistant colonies were performed in the same culture dish. The reseeding of treated cells eliminated the possibility of metabolic cooperation within mosaic colonies of wild-type and mutant cells and achieved expression of the induced changes before intercolony crossfeeding reduced the frequency of resistant colonies.—AZG-resistant colonies were selected in medium containing dialyzed fetal bovine serum, and the selection medium was replaced at least twice. Both serum dialysis and selection medium replacement were necessary for consistent achievement of background frequencies of resistant colonies near 10-6. Reconstruction experiments with AZG-resistant V79 lines showed that the efficiency of recovery of resistant cells in the selection medium was constant over a range of 0–20 colonies observed/dish. A mixed population of V79 and AZG-resistant cells was also correctly analyzed by the procedure used in mutagenesis studies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (890.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arlett C. F., Harcourt S. A. The induction of 8-azaguanine-resistant mutants in cultured Chinese hamster cells by ultraviolet light. The effect of changes in post-irradiation conditions. Mutat Res. 1972 Apr;14(4):431–437. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(72)90140-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bridges B. A., Huckle J. Mutagenesis of cultured mammalian cells by X-radiation and ultraviolet light. Mutat Res. 1970 Aug;10(2):141–151. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(70)90159-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caboche M. Comparison of the frequencies of spontaneous and chemically-induced 5-bromodeoxyuridine-resistance mutations in wild-type and revertant BHK-21-13 cells. Genetics. 1974 Jun;77(2):309–322. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.2.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chu E. H., Malling H. V. Mammalian cell genetics. II. Chemical induction of specific locus mutations in Chinese hamster cells in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Dec;61(4):1306–1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.4.1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cox R. P., Krauss M. R., Balis M. E., Dancis J. Communication between normal and enzyme deficient cells in tissue culture. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Sep;74(1):251–268. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90503-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Peterson A. R., Peterson H., Heidelberger C. The influence of serum components on the growth and mutation of Chinese hamster cells in medium containing aminopterin. Mutat Res. 1974 Jul;24(1):25–33. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(74)90043-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thompson L. H., Baker R. M. Isolation of mutants of cultured mammalian cells. Methods Cell Biol. 1973;6:209–281. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES