TABLE 2.

VAS score for the doctor’s satisfaction levels with the three tray fabrication methods.

Satisfaction (VAS)	Impression compound trimming	Light curing	CAD and 3DP	F	P-value
Q1	57.89 ± 8.27	73.85 ± 6.64*	84.97 ± 5.12*#	0.169	<0.001
Q2	58.96 ± 9.14	75.92 ± 6.21*	86.03 ± 4.83*#	0.251	<0.001
Q3	78.43 ± 8.95	80.17 ± 5.72*	79.82 ± 4.91*#	1.005	0.839
Q4	59.68 ± 8.47	73.52 ± 6.46*	86.49 ± 6.35*#	0.453	<0.001
Q5	60.21 ± 7.88	73.79 ± 5.95*	85.38 ± 6.62*#	0.521	<0.001
Q6	59.74 ± 7.83	75.12 ± 6.09*	86.55 ± 5.73*#	0.437	<0.001

Note: All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations. CAD, computer-aided design; 3DP, three-dimensional printing; Q, question. Block P-value indicated the block effect; Methods P-value indicated the main effect. * Compared to Impression compound trimming group, P < 0.05. # Compared to Light curing group, P < 0.05.