Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1975 Oct;81(2):293–311. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.2.293

Compound Autosomes in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: The Meiotic Behavior of Compound Thirds

David G Holm 1,2, Arthur Chovnick 1,2
PMCID: PMC1213399  PMID: 812769

Abstract

Studies of the meiotic distribution of compound-3 chromosomes in males and females of Drosophila melanogaster provided the following results. (1) From females homozygous for the standard arrangement of all chromosomes other than C(3L) and C(3R), less than 5% of the gametes recovered were nullosomic or disomic for compound-3 chromosomes. The frequency of nonsegregation differed between strains, but within a given strain it remained relatively constant. (2) According to egg-hatch frequencies, C(3L) and C(3R) segregate independently during spermatogenesis. (3) In females, structurally heterozygous second chromosomes occasion a marked increase in the recovery of nonsegregational progeny; in males, rearranged seconds have no apparent influence on the distribution of compound thirds. (4) The highest frequencies of nonsegregational progeny were recovered from C(3L);C(3R) females carrying compound-X (plus free Y) chromosomes. (5) In comparing the recovery of nonsegregating compound thirds to the recovery of rearranged heterologs, a definite nonrandom distribution was realized in several crosses. These results are examined in reference to the concepts of distributive pairing (Grell 1962). Moreover, considering the structural nature of compound autosomes, we propose that nonhomologous (distributive) pairing is a property of the centromeric region and suggest that rearrangements involving breaks in this region possibly alter the effectiveness of distributive pairing forces.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baldwin M., Chovnick A. Autosomal half-tetrad analysis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1967 Feb;55(2):277–293. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.2.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chovnick A., Ballantyne G. H., Baillie D. L., Holm D. G. Gene conversion in higher organisms: half-tetrad analysis of recombination within the rosy cistron of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1970 Oct;66(2):315–329. doi: 10.1093/genetics/66.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper K. W., Zimmering S., Krivshenko J. INTERCHROMOSOMAL EFFECTS AND SEGREGATION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Nov 15;41(11):911–914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.11.911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grell R F. Non Random Assortment of Non-Homologous Chromosomes in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1959 May;44(3):421–435. doi: 10.1093/genetics/44.3.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lindsley D. L., Grell E. H. Spermiogenesis without chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1969;61(1 Suppl):69–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Moore C. M., Grell R. F. Factors affecting recognition and disjunction of chromosomes at distributive pairing in female Drosophila melanogaster. I. Total length vs. arm length. Genetics. 1972 Apr;70(4):567–581. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.4.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. NOVITSKI E. AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE DISTRIBUTIVE PAIRING HYPOTHESIS IN DROSOPHILA. Genetics. 1964 Dec;50:1449–1451. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.6.1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sandler L., Lindsley D. L., Nicoletti B., Trippa G. Mutants affecting meiosis in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1968 Nov;60(3):525–558. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.3.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scriba M. E. Embryonale Entwicklungsstörungen bei Nullosomie und Tetrasomie des 3. Chromosoms von Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1969 Feb;19(2):160–177. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(69)90053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Würgler F. E., Ruch P., Graf U. X-ray-induced loss of the maternal second chromosome in inseminated eggs of Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res. 1972 May;15(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(72)90089-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES