Table 2.
The experimental design and results for response surface analysis.
| Run | X1 | X2 | X3 | Chrysophanol rejection (%) | Aurantio-obtusin rejection (%) | Membrane flux (L/m2·h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 94.33 | 98.52 | 25.8 |
| 2 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 79.26 | 84.72 | 24.1 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 86.09 | 90.20 | 19.3 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89.72 | 93.70 | 18.9 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87.69 | 91.57 | 18.0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88.39 | 93.37 | 17.4 |
| 7 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 90.63 | 95.82 | 28.9 |
| 8 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 92.08 | 97.26 | 17.1 |
| 9 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 78.09 | 83.50 | 17.9 |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 93.86 | 94.04 | 21.0 |
| 11 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 81.07 | 86.21 | 22.5 |
| 12 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 89.98 | 93.37 | 26.6 |
| 13 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 88.38 | 93.09 | 16.2 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87.04 | 93.07 | 18.8 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88.26 | 92.31 | 19.2 |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 94.27 | 98.85 | 16.9 |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 85.61 | 91.24 | 20.4 |