Skip to main content
Gastro Hep Advances logoLink to Gastro Hep Advances
. 2025 Mar 15;4(6):100654. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100654

Guts for Self-Eating: Role of Autophagy in Gastrointestinal Health and Disease

Prashant Nighot 1,, Jonathan Stine 1, Kofi Clarke 1
PMCID: PMC12137169  PMID: 40487273

Abstract

Autophagy, a highly conserved cellular degradation pathway promotes cell survival via lysosomal degradation of aberrant cellular proteins and recycling of the nutrients. A variety of human diseases are now linked to defective autophagy and there is ever-growing interest in the application of autophagy in healthy living as well as disease prevention and therapies. Autophagy plays very important and complex functions in the gastrointestinal tract which are an intense focus of the current research efforts. Autophagy maintains cellular homeostasis mainly through proteostasis, lipid regulation, mitigation of damaged mitochondria, removal of intracellular infectious agents and foreign material, and reduction in reactive oxygen species and inflammasome. Recent studies show that although autophagy is mostly beneficial, it can induce damaging effects depending upon the cellular contexts such as homeostatic or inflammatory conditions. We summarize that this double-edge effect of autophagy is associated with cell-specific and cell-autonomous functions of autophagy, noncanonical autophagic effects, and autophagy-independent functions of autophagy-related proteins. We review opposing effects of autophagy pathway and its differential cellular functions specifically relevant to gastrointestinal homeostasis. We highlight the impacts of autophagy-related genetic defects in inflammatory bowel disease and the evolving role of autophagy in gastrointestinal and liver diseases including fibrosis and neoplastic processes. We also provide a contemporary perspective on the clinical studies related to autophagy and highlight the context-specific outcomes of autophagy and their relevance. The growing knowledge of the diverse autophagy regulatory mechanisms will provide further insights into how this life-friendly, self-cleansing cellular process can be harnessed for therapeutic advantages in gastrointestinal and liver diseases.

Keywords: Autophagy, Intestinal Homeostasis, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Fibrosis

Autophagy: Pathway and Cellular Functions

Autophagy (auto: oneself, phagy: to eat, latin) came into the limelight when Yoshinori Ohsumi was awarded the 2016 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discoveries of mechanisms for autophagy. Autophagy refers to the mechanisms that help the host cells to eliminate misfolded, aggregated proteins and organelles via lysosomal degradation.1 In a well-coordinated, multistep process of macroautophagy (commonly referred as autophagy), more than 15 autophagy-related genes (ATGs)/proteins take part in initiation (formation of the phagophore mediated by 2 key protein kinase complexes, ULK1/2-ATG13-RB1CC1/FIP200 complex, and the BECN1-PIK3C3/Vps34-PIK3R4/Vps15-ATG14 complex), expansion of the phagophore (involving ubiquitin-like proteins ATG12 and GABARAP/light chain 3 [LC3]), autophagosome formation (closure of phagophore which requires lipidation of cytosolic ATG8 or LC3-I to LC3-II), and the fusion of autophagosome with the lysosome to form an autolysosome where the cargo proteins are selectively degraded (Figure 1).2 Besides the core ATG proteins, additional proteins required for this degradative pathway include cytoskeletal motor proteins, tethering factors, soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor proteins, and membrane adapter proteins.3

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The canonical autophagy pathway, which is largely regulated by mTOR and AMPK, is initiated by assembly of ULK1 complex and recruitment of PI3KC3 complex to form phagophore. Recruitment of ATG12–ATG5–ATG16L1 complex helps phagophore expansion and promote LC3 lipidation on the phagophore membrane. During LC3 lipidation, LC3/Atg8 is cleaved by ATG4 protease to generate cytosolic LC3-I which is conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine in a ubiquitin-like reaction to form LC3-II, a process that requires Atg7 and Atg3 (E1 and E2-like enzymes, respectively). The lipidated form of LC3, known as LC3-II, is attached to the autophagosome membrane. With the help of endosomal sorting complexes required for transport machinery and N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor complexes (not shown) the autophagosomes are fused with lysosomes to form an autolysosome where the cargo proteins are degraded.

The fundamental cellular function of autophagy is 2-fold. Autophagy maintains cellular homeostasis by degradation of toxic misfolded and aggregated proteins and provides nutrients to cells, particularly under stress. Based on the cargo, the autophagy functions in numerous cell homeostatic processes including proteostasis and removal of misfolded proteins, damaged mitochondria (mitophagy), lipids (lipophagy), intracellular infectious agents, and foreign material (xenophagy). Though, by and large, autophagy is a degradative pathway, under certain conditions autophagy can deliver the cargo to the plasma membrane and extracellular environment. A classic example of this secretory autophagy is the extracellular release of proinflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-1β which is delivered to extracellular space via incorporation into the autophagic membrane.4,5 Moreover, autophagy-related proteins may have autophagy independent functions such as ATG5-mediated regulation of cytokines during intestinal inflammation6 or ATG6-mediated steady state regulation of intestinal tight junction (TJ) barrier.7

Autophagy as a Lifestyle

Autophagy is the major catabolic mechanism used by eukaryotic cells to maintain nutrient homeostasis and adaptation to stress, and also complementarily referred to as ‘recycling’ or ‘self-cleansing’ process. These days, autophagy is a common word in our health-conscious society. Search for “autophagy” on commercial shopping platforms yields hundreds of hits that include books, diet supplements, cooking recipes and more. Currently, potential autophagy modulation is achieved through means such as various modes of fasting, calorie restriction, and physical activity.

In terms of fasting, intermittent fasting is a common practice and has different short- and long-term diet programs with regular cycles between the time of eating and fasting.8, 9, 10 In alternate-day fasting protocol, fasting is done every other day with unrestricted feeding on feeding days. In time-restricted programs, food consumption, with or without calorie restriction, is limited to a certain window of few hours a day. Calorie-restricted programs consist of providing up to 25%–30% of total energy demands for a period ranging from a day to several weeks.11 Due to the experimental evidence of calorie restriction having beneficial impact on metabolic health, inflammation, and age-related diseases, it is being explored in clinical studies as a treatment for inflammatory diseases.12 Intermittent fasting has also been shown to be beneficial for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), especially when periods of fasting exceed 12–18 hours.13

Autophagy has also recently emerged as an important process involved in the adaptive responses to exercise.14 The outcomes of exercise in terms of autophagy include both increased autophagy flux as well as transcriptional activation of autophagy genes by various transcriptional factors to increase the autophagic capacity in human skeletal muscles.15,16 Furthermore, autophagy seems to mediate many of the positive effects of exercise such as increase in muscle mass, better glucose regulation, and reduction in reactive oxygen species (ROS).14 However, the exact mechanism behind induction of autophagy may depend on factors such as intensity/duration of exercise, feeding, and timing of biological sampling,14,17,18 which may add variability to the autophagic responses observed after exercise. The proteostasis (regulation of protein through the biogenesis, folding, trafficking, and degradation) function of autophagy is thought to mediate the clearance of damaged proteins and organelles due to heat, altered pH, and mechanical stress, and maintain cellular function in myocytes.17,19,20 Though precise autophagic response to exercise in different cell types in intestine has not been documented in humans, both calorie restriction and exercise are known to be capable of instigating a global autophagic response.21,22 Also, at least in part, exercise and calorie restriction initiate autophagy through the common cellular pathways, such as energy sensing AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and histone modifying Sirtuin 1, resulting in inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).12,19 Moreover, in experimental models, intestinal autophagy is required for the beneficial effect of dietary restriction on health span, longevity, and stem cell regeneration.23 Overall, intestinal autophagy appears to be an important component of the global impact of autophagy on the host health and disease. At the same time, considering the constant exposure of the intestinal lining to microbes, luminal antigens, and nutrients, the autophagic responses might be different in the intestine compared to other parenchymal organs such as liver and muscular organs such heart and skeletal muscles.

Autophagy in Health and Disease

A variety of human diseases are now linked to defective autophagy pathway or mutations in ATGs that regulate various signaling pathways.24 An example is Crohn’s disease (CD) where several ATG mutations can dysregulate major cellular defenses such as xenophagy, inflammasome, and antimicrobial secretions. On the other hand, selective autophagy deficiencies due to mutations in autophagy adapter proteins or master kinases is linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.25,26 While genetic mutations disrupting autophagolysosomal fusion are associated with congenital neurodevelopmental problems,27 mutations disabling lysosomal functions are linked to Alzheimer’s disease28 and Parkinson’s disease.29 The defects in autophagolysosomal degradation or loss of degradative capacity often lead to toxic accumulation of cargo such as α-synuclein30 or amyloid precursor protein.31 Recent evidence suggests autophagy is as a primary mechanism of lipid metabolism in mammalian hepatocytes, making it an important therapeutic target in MASLD.32

Autophagy has a broad influence on cellular senescence. Under homeostatic conditions, autophagy plays antisenescence role by mitigating dysfunction of mitochondria, ROS, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and maintaining lysosomal integrity. However, in certain conditions such as advanced senescence, autophagy may function as prosenescence mechanisms by supporting cell survival. In the later case, autophagy supports cell survival by degrading antisenescence factors and supporting synthesis of senescence-associated factors.33 At organismal level, autophagy has been consistently identified as a declining pathway during aging in several organisms while upregulation of autophagy by genetic or pharmacological means promotes longevity in animals. Rapamycin treatment or overexpression of autophagy genes has been shown to have geroprotective effects in Drosophila and mice.34,35 In particular, intestinal autophagy has been important in promoting longevity and health span and maintaining intestinal barrier in model organisms.36,37

Clinical Studies on Autophagy

In line with the relevance of autophagy for human health, several clinical studies have been initiated to investigate the effect of autophagy inducing lifestyles or autophagy inducing pharmacologic agents on human health. More than 100 of these clinical trials have been investigating the effect of autophagy modulation on diverse conditions such as diabetes, aging, autoimmune disorders, infections, and cancers (ClinicalTrials.gov). Autophagy modulation along with primary therapeutic agents has also been investigated in several clinical conditions, including MASLD, and cancers. The most relevant questions being investigated in these clinical trials are when (timeline) is autophagy induced, how to detect it (peripheral sampling or native target tissue), and if it has clinical effect (impact on target clinical parameters) after an intervention. Various forms of restrictive diets including nutrient-dense fasting mimicking diet (FMD) has been shown to induce autophagy and promote multisystem regeneration and reduce inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)–associated inflammation.38,39 In a randomized controlled trial, 4 weeks of strict alternate day fasting improved markers of general health in middle-aged humans (including cardiovascular markers, fat mass, fat-to-lean ratio, and levels of proaging amino-acid methionine (NCT02673515).40 In other clinical trials (NCT02158897 and NCT04150159), periodic plant-based FMD showed beneficial effects including reduced insulin resistance and lower hepatic fat, along with a decrease of 2.5 years in median predicted biological age.41,42 The effect of FMD on autophagy in humans (NCT06115551) as well as the status of autophagy in pediatric CD (NCT05842564) is currently awaited. Similarly, the effect of Dapagliflozin, a selective sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and potentially autophagy inducer is being investigated in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (NCT05986136).

Role of Autophagy in Gastrointestinal Tract

Our improved understanding of the remarkable ability of autophagy to regulate intestinal epithelial architecture and metabolism,43,44 functions of specific intestinal epithelial subsets,45, 46, 47 and inflammatory pathways and gut microbiota48 is recent and evolving. Autophagy promotes several intestinal homeostatic processes including Paneth cell function,49 mucin production,45 stem cell regeneration,43 antibacterial defense,50 and paracellular barrier.51, 52, 53

The interest in the autophagic functions in intestine was mostly fueled by the findings of the genome-wide association studies that identified mutations in ATG genes as risk factors for CD.54,55 The most commonly involved ATG variant in CD is ATG16L1 T300A and the risk allele (G allele) is significantly associated with both adult-onset and pediatric-onset CD, as well as perianal CD.56 Via its interaction with multiple autophagy-related proteins, ATG16 plays an important role in phagophore formation and its maturation into autophagosome, which subsequently fuse with the lysosome. The ATG16L1 T300A variant expression has been associated with decreased antimicrobial peptide production, impaired intracellular bacterial clearance, defects in antigen presentation and increased proinflammatory cytokine production.46,49,57 The T300A variation makes ATG16L1 more susceptible to cleavage by caspase 3, resulting in a reduction in the autophagic flux.58 Similarly, mutations in other ATGs, which are known to increase the risk for IBD, affect cellular defenses and the intestinal barrier (listed in the Table).

Table.

Autophagy Genes Involved in IBD Risk

Gene Mechanism and function
ATG16L1 T300A polymorphism promotes caspase 3-mediated cleavage.58
ATG16L1 plays an important role in Paneth cell lysozyme secretion,59 bacterial clearance,46 homeostasis of ER stress,60 and cytokine and T cell responses.46,48
IRGM Regulates autophagy organization for antibacterial defense.61
LRRK2 Variant allele in CD (and Parkinson’s disease) increases LRRK activity and inhibits autophagy.62
GPR65 Variant of proton-sensing G protein–coupled receptor affects lysosomal pH and decreases intracellular bacterial clearance.63
MTMR3 Mutation in this PI3P phosphatase decreases autophagy and increases proinflammatory response in macrophages.64
PTPN2 Single-nucleotide polymorphism in PTPN2 gene that encodes protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 2 impairs autophagosome formation, diminishes bacterial clearance, and increases apoptosis.65PTPN2 also regulates epithelial-macrophage crosstalk to promote intestinal barrier.66
CALCOCO2 Mutation disrupts function of this autophagy adapter and enhances inflammatory gene response.67
SMURF1 This ubiquitin ligase plays a role in selective autophagy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and antituberculous host defense.68
XBP1 XBP1 is involved in activation of autophagy genes and hypomorphic variant is a genetic risk for IBD.69

LRRK2, leucine-rich repeat kinase 2; PTPN2, protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 2; XBP1, X-box binding protein 1.

Autophagy and Cellular Pathogenic Mechanisms

Common presence of aberrant structure and function of Paneth cell in mice mutant for different ATGs,70 indicates importance of an intact autophagy pathway in cellular homeostasis. Diverse developmental, infectious, metabolic, and pathophysiologic processes lead to accumulation of misfolded proteins and induce ER stress which is followed by the unfolded protein response (UPR) aimed at restoration of cellular homeostasis. However, persistent unmitigated ER stress overwhelms UPR and disrupts intestinal cellular homeostasis. Mutations in the genes involved in the UPR as well as autophagy are known to be strongly associated with the risk for IBD development,69 and elevated ER stress has been detected in intestinal epithelial cells in IBD71,72 as well as several IBD models,69,71, 72, 73, 74 indicating a pathologic role of ER stress in human intestinal diseases. Autophagy is thought to be an alternate way of degradation of misfolded proteins.75 Also, a major UPR pathway, inositol-requiring enzyme 1 upregulates several cell survival autophagy genes via activation of X-box binding protein 1.76 Thus, deficiency of autophagy exaggerates ER stress.47,69 In another example, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) which is a basic-leucine-zipper transcriptional factor and a principal antioxidant mechanism, controls the expression of antioxidant cytoprotective genes during cellular stress.77 Normally, Nrf2 is ubiquitinated or kept in the cytoplasm by cysteine rich Keap1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase adapter. In canonical pathway, oxidative stress oxidizes cysteine residues in Keap1, thereby interrupting the Nrf2 ubiquitination and activating Nrf2. The exciting discoveries, a decade ago, connected autophagy to redox. In these noncanonical pathways, the autophagy substrate p62 activates Nrf2 via competitive binding to Keap178,79 or degradation of Keap1,80 indicating an important role of autophagy in alleviating oxidative stress, particularly since Nrf2 levels are reduced in IBD.81

Autophagy and Gut Permeability

Increased gut permeability due to the loss of intestinal interepithelial TJ barrier is a key feature of IBD. In a recent large prospective study, increased intestinal permeability, as early as 3 years before the clinical diagnosis, was found to be associated with the later development of CD.82 Moreover, persistent increase in intestinal permeability predicts poor clinical outcome, while normalization of intestinal permeability correlates with long-term clinical remission.83 The increased intestinal permeability in IBD is partly attributed to an increase in the levels of channel-forming TJ protein claudin-2 as well as a decrease in the levels of barrier-forming occludin.84,85 We have shown that autophagy profoundly enhances intestinal TJ barrier function via its effect on intracellular trafficking of TJ proteins. Autophagy promotes endocytosis and lysosomal degradation of pore-forming claudin-2 and ATG7 dependent LC3 lipidation is required for internalization of claudin-2 into autophagosomes.51,86 On the other hand, autophagy enhances barrier-forming occludin protein levels by inhibiting its constitutive degradation and protects against inflammation-induced TJ barrier loss.7,52 Furthermore, acute deletion of Atg7 in mice increased colonic claudin-2 levels and decreased occludin levels and promotes the susceptibility to experimental colitis. This effect of TJ barrier enhancement is also evident upon activation of autophagy pathway in human colonic explants.51,52 Numerous studies show that a variety of compounds that have beneficial effects against TJ barrier disruption and intestinal inflammation also induce autophagy. The specific role of autophagy in modulating the TJ barrier and inflammation in the disease ameliorating effects of these compounds needs further investigations.

Role of Autophagy in Gut Immunity

Autophagy plays essential cell-specific functions in distinct gut immune cells to promote gut mucosal homeostasis. In dendritic cells and macrophages, autophagy processes antigens for major histocompatibility complex I and II presentation, maintains major histocompatibility complex II expression, and regulates cytokine secretion and inflammasome. Many of these functions are carried out via autophagy-mediated intracellular trafficking of immune molecules and degradation of damaged mitochondria, thus limiting ROS production and direct degradation of inflammasome.87 In the gut, autophagy (via xenophagy) restricts systemic dissemination of enteric pathogens such as Salmonella,50 Shigella,88 and Listeria.89 It must be noted though that several pathogens subvert autophagic machinery and use it for their survival and replication.90

There is significant evidence that autophagy helps survival and proliferation of distinct T cell population in intestinal mucosa.87 In the absence of autophagy, Treg cell population is decreased while Th2 population is significantly increased along with aberrant immune responses in intestinal mucosa. However, disease-associated Th1 and Th17 population is decreased in mice with Atg16l1 deficiency.91 Autophagy may also contribute to the regulation of signaling cascades downstream of the T cell receptor in activated T cells, particularly via regulation of NFκB pathway.87,92 The specific functions of autophagy in other unique leukocyte cells such as intraepithelial lymphocytes are not clear while autophagy is known to support maturation of innate lymphoid cells.93 Analogous to the requirement of autophagy in highly secretory Paneth cells and goblet cells, autophagy is needed for long survival of plasma cells.94 Thus, autophagy plays a nuanced function in gut immunity.

Autophagy and Intestinal Fibrosis

Autophagy also impacts intestinal fibrosis, which is an undesirable outcome in IBD. By and large, most previous studies show an antifibrotic role of autophagy,95, 96, 97, 98 although autophagy has also been shown to promote intestinal fibrosis.99 This is analogous to the unclear role of autophagy in fibrosis in other organs. Though autophagy inhibits fibrosis via collagen degradation in primary fibroblasts,95 inhibition of IL-23/IL-22-mediated intestinal fibrosis,96 Rho-associated protein kinase inhibition,97 and prevention of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition,98 it has also been shown to activate myofibroblasts.99 It is possible that the adverse cellular microenvironment during inflammation decimate autophagy and it’s antifibrotic role as inhibition of NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 in intestinal fibroblasts from IBD patients promotes autophagy while reducing proliferation and increasing collagen degradation.100 Thus, the role of autophagy in fibrosis may be context, model, and stage dependent.

Effect of Autophagy on Gut Microbiota

The autophagic process in the host intestinal cells also regulates luminal microbiota. Experimental studies show that lack of autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells increases bacterial burden, reduces microbiota diversity, and alters the balance of gut microbiota from anti-inflammatory to proinflammatory bacteria.101,102 The CD ATG16L1T300A mutant expression in mice leads to promotion of Th1 and Th17 differentiation and also steady state and disease associated increase in Bacteroidetes species.48 In humans, autophagy-related IBD variants are associated with reduction in butyrate-producing species,103 and increase in IBD-promoting Ig-A coated bacteria104 and pathosymbiont groups such as Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Fusobacteriaceae.105 On the other hand, the gut microbiota and bacterial metabolites are able to influence intestinal autophagy, mostly via affecting the energy metabolism of intestinal epithelial cells.106,107 Though the mechanisms are not completely understood, it is certain that autophagy in host intestinal cells regulate gut microbiota while defective autophagy is associated with establishment of pathobionts,108 and that the complex interplay between gut autophagy, microbiota, and inflammation have implications for several systemic diseases besides IBD.

Autophagy in Neoplastic Process

Considering the facts that autophagy promotes cell homeostasis and ameliorate intestinal inflammation, it is thought that autophagy may reduce colitis-associated colon cancer (CAC) initiation. The experimental evidences for specific mechanisms through which autophagy can inhibit CAC development include suppression of ROS-induced chromosomal instability,109 inflammasome,110 oxidative stress,111 colonization of CAC-promoting bacteria,112 etc. However, just like any other biological process, autophagy has double edge. Thus, being a cell survival mechanism, autophagy has undesirable outcomes once the tumor transformation has taken place. By providing nutrition and immune escape for the cancer cells, autophagy may promote tumor development in advanced stages.113 Thus, during early hepatocarcinogenesis, autophagy inhibits early-stage tumor formation114 while it supports cell proliferation during advanced stages of cancer.115 This protumorigenic and antitumorigenic role of autophagy may also be associated with other concomitantly active cellular mechanisms such as p53.116 Autophagy also forms the basis of embryonic development pause-like stage or diapause that tumor cells acquire during the chemoresistance.117 However, autophagy has more to offer as an anticancer tool in the form of autophagy-dependent cell death and autophagy-mediated cell death.118 During autophagy-dependent cell death, more than single ATG proteins promote cell death by mechanisms such as excessive ER phagy, mitophagy, or autosis in the presence of active autophagic flux.118,119 In autophagy-mediated cell death, autophagy proteins interact with cell death molecules to trigger various types of cell death such as apoptosis, ferroptosis, and necrosis in specific cellular context of availability of adenosine triphosphate or depletion of iron and lipids.118 Thus, though current clinical applications in cancers are focused on inhibition of autophagy to decimate cell survival, there is also scope to use autophagy to induce cancer cell death.

Role of Autophagy in Chronic Liver Diseases (CLDs) and Fibrosis

Autophagy has several beneficial effects in chronic liver diseases (CLDs) such as viral hepatitis, alcohol-related liver disease, MASLD, and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Autophagy promotes insulin sensitivity,120 degrades intracellular lipids in the hepatocytes (lipophagy),121 and prevents cell injuries caused by oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines.122,123 The hepatocyte injury during CLD is followed by progressive replacement of liver parenchyma by fibrotic tissue with excessive deposition of collagen-rich extracellular matrix. Numerous studies unequivocally demonstrate that compounds that induce autophagy in the liver have an antifibrotic role through various mechanisms such as inhibition of AKT/mTOR,124 modulation of Sirtuin 1/transforming growth factor-β/Smad3 pathway,125 and accumulation of senescence-inducing transcription factor, GATA6.126 Other autophagy-mediated antifibrotic mechanisms include apoptosis in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs),127,128 as well as reduction in the accumulation and release of exosome-bound profibrotic mediators.129,130 In fact, aging or obesity, which inhibit autophagy, are known to predispose to CLD.131 Also, the activity of autophagy-inducer AMPK are low and autophagy-repressor mTOR is high is MASH and our previous work shows that moderate exercise in patients with biopsy-proven MASH reduces phospho-ribosomal protein S6 levels, implicating autophagy in the beneficial effect of exercise in MASH.132

Persistent liver injury activates the quiescent lipid-storing HSCs which transdifferentiate into proliferative fibrogenic myofibroblasts and become the primary source of liver fibrosis.133 Despite significant research, the role of autophagy in HSCs remains ambiguous. Several studies depict autophagy as a profibrogenic process due to its association with HSC activation. The main mechanism underlying autophagy-mediated HSC activation and fibrosis is autophagy-mediated lipid droplet (LD) depletion which has been shown to concur with HSC activation.133 It is postulated that LD loss supports the fibrogenic phenotype of HSC by supplying extra energy for extracellular matrix production and deposition.133 However, the promotion of fibrogenic responses by autophagy in HSCs, as shown by many prior studies does not fit well with the fact that antifibrotic agents such as statin and metformin are known autophagy inducers. Moreover, interventions such as weight loss, calorie restriction, extended fasting, and physical activity that are recommended to patients with metabolic syndromes like MASLD and MASH promote autophagy.131,134, 135, 136 Overall, the role of autophagy in liver homeostasis and disease appears to be model, experimental agent, cell type, and context-specific, and the dichotomous role of autophagy in hepatocytes (cytoprotective, antifibrogenic) and HSCs (profibrogenic) needs further investigation. Also, results of a clinical trial studying whether autophagy pathway–related genetic polymorphisms in ATG16l1 affect MASLD (NCT01988441) will shed light on the role of autophagy in liver diseases.

Context Specific Outcomes of Autophagy

Outcomes of autophagy depend on the contexts including but not limited to the cell type, cargo targeted by autophagy, extent of autophagy induction, stage of disease, etc. Besides the differential outcomes of autophagy in hepatocytes vs stellate cells as discussed above, cell-specific effect of autophagy is exemplified by the autophagic immune responses. Autophagy has been shown to promote Treg and decimate Th2 responses. The basis of this differential regulation of T cell repertoire is thought to be the metabolic differences. Treg and memory CD8+ cells being dependent on fatty acid metabolism suffer glycolytic shift in the absence of autophagy while Th2 cells, which can sustain prolonged glycolysis, resist deficiency of autophagy.91,137 We have previously demonstrated the substrate specific outcome of autophagy induction in the model Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) epithelia where autophagy induction reduced the paracellular permeability and increased the transepithelial resistance in claudin-2 high MDCK II cells, and this effect of autophagy was not evident in claudin-2 deficient MDCK I cells.86 Autophagy can be cytodestructive when sustained AMPK-mediated activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase causes disassembly of mTORC2 complex.138 Similarly, autophagy is rapidly and excessively upregulated in necrotizing enterocolitis mice model and erythropoietin, a breast milk component downregulated autophagy via the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway to preserve the intestinal barrier function and reduce the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis.139 Furthermore, AMPK mediated cytokine-induced TJ barrier modulation independent of intracellular energy levels, indicating that autophagy regulators may have autophagy-independent role in various cellular processes.140 A recent study showed that CYP1B1 is upregulated during HSC activation and causes metabolic depletion of trehalose in HSCs. In this context, trehalose, which is a known inducer of autophagy in several other cell types including hepatocytes, inhibits autophagy in HSCs.141 Thus, autophagy modulators may have cell-specific effects.

The role of autophagy in the host defense responses during an infectious process can be very complicated. For instance, H. pylori infection induces autophagy as a host defense mechanism and the outcomes of the interaction of autophagy and H. pylori pathogenic mechanisms are defined by the various virulence factors of H. pylori and the magnitude of apoptosis, ER stress, and lysosomal damage induced by H. pylori.142 Also, several microRNAs regulate the H. pylori invasion and survival in the gastric mucosa by either promoting or decimating expression of various ATGs.142 The outcome of autophagic modulation can also be defined by other concomitantly active cellular mechanisms. In a humanized mouse model of activated oncogenic allele of Kras-driven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, autophagy has protumorigenic and antitumorigenic roles in the presence and absence of tumor suppressor p53, respectively. Thus, autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine, which is currently being targeted in several clinical trials, promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice containing oncogenic Kras but lacking p53.116 Also, the interaction between an environment and autophagy genes can result into cellular defects, for instance Atg16l1 T300A together with smoking leads to Paneth cell defects,143 and such interaction can also affect Paneth cell function in a noncell-autonomous way via proinflammatory hyperactivity of LRRK2 kinase in macrophages.144

Conclusion

Autophagy has been extensively studied in the biomedical field due to its importance in homeostasis as well as several human diseases. In spite of the use of autophagy-inducing agents or tools in several human health areas such as life style modifications (calorie restriction, fasting, exercise), neurodegenerative diseases (clearance of toxic protein aggregates), geroprotection (eg, luteolin supplement, NCT04489017), cancers (chemosensitization) etc., the application of autophagy in intestinal and hepatic inflammation is unclear. There are several aspects of autophagy that need to be clarified before autophagy can be fully employed in clinics. Though largely beneficial for the host, autophagy may be detrimental due to its prosurvival effects in cancer progression,145 drug resistance in cancer,146 or autophagic cell death caused by excessive autophagic activation.147 Cell autonomous effects of autophagy is another reason for confusing outcomes at the tissue, organs, and host level, indicating need for the clear resolution of cell-specific and cell-independent functions of autophagy.

It is also recognized that the detection of autophagy can be a ‘moving target’ due to cell specificity and the dynamic nature of the autophagic process, as well as due to the new knowledge and techniques being constantly developed.148 There is also lack of reliable, noninvasive autophagy biomarkers which can be used to assess the effectiveness of autophagy-based interventions. The current measurement of autophagy in terms of turnover of autophagy proteins, degradation of autophagy substrates, and detection of autophagic structures requires invasive tissue sampling or genetic modulation of autophagy in the animal models. Few innovative studies have used human blood samples to demonstrate autophagy flux,149,150 but these methods need ex-vivo test sample incubations.

Autophagy being an integral part of cellular homeostasis, it is essential to know the impact of any particular IBD therapeutic tool on intestinal autophagy. The major IBD therapeutic agents such as corticosteroids, amino salicylates, thiopurines, immunomodulators, and biologics are known to be autophagy modulator.151 Previous studies show that functional autophagy induces regulatory macrophages during anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and thus may be required for optimal therapeutic outcomes.152 Similarly, as cytoplasmic STAT3 can inactivate global transcription machinery which drives autophagy genes under stress,153 autophagy may play a role in determining the outcomes of the new class of JAK-STAT inhibitors IBD therapy. Moreover, ability of rapamycin analogs in successful treatment of refractory CD154,155 but failure in maintaining CD remission in a clinical study,156 indicates necessity for context-based, personalized, and more nuanced examination of autophagy modulators in IBD therapeutics. Overall, the modulation of the autophagy pathway may have context dependent outcomes and not uniform responses across the various disease conditions. Thus, future studies should consider personalized, cell type–specific, physiological vs pathologic, tissue- vs organ-level outcomes in exploring the immense potential autophagy has in transforming the therapeutic efforts against gastrointestinal and liver diseases (Figure 2) as well as many more autoimmune and systemic diseases.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Autophagy plays several beneficial roles in maintaining homeostasis, as indicated. The beneficial effects of autophagy are boosted by exercise, calorie restriction, and rapamycin and its analogs and statins. In certain disease states, autophagy induction may have undesirable outcomes mainly due to its prosurvival functions in a cell and tissue-specific contexts.

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank Shannon Dalessio for reading and editing the manuscript.

Authors' Contributions:

Prashant Nighot: Conception, writing – original draft. Jonathan Stine: Writing – original draft, editing, feedback. Kofi Clarke: Writing – original draft, editing, feedback.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: These authors disclose the following: Dr Jonathan Stine receives or has received research support from Astra Zeneca, Galectin, Kowa, Noom, Inc, Novo Nordisk, and Zydus Therapeutics. Dr Stine consults for Novo Nordisk. Dr Kofi Clarke is consultant for Takeda and AbbVie, and serves on the advisory board of AbbVie and Janssen. He is part of speakers' bureau for Takeda, AbbVie, Janssen, and Pfizer. The remaining author discloses no conflicts.

Funding: This research work has been supported in part by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant DK114024 and K23DK131290, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Grant AI185281.

Ethical Statement: The study did not require the approval of an institutional review board.

Reporting Guidelines: Not applicable for this article type.

References

  • 1.Levine B., Kroemer G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell. 2008;132:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deretic V., Saitoh T., Akira S. Autophagy in infection, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:722–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tian Y., Li Z., Hu W., et al. C. elegans screen identifies autophagy genes specific to multicellular organisms. Cell. 2010;141:1042–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang M., Kenny S.J., Ge L., et al. Translocation of interleukin-1beta into a vesicle intermediate in autophagy-mediated secretion. Elife. 2015;4 doi: 10.7554/eLife.11205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kimura T., Jia J., Kumar S., et al. Dedicated SNAREs and specialized TRIM cargo receptors mediate secretory autophagy. EMBO J. 2017;36:42–60. doi: 10.15252/embj.201695081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Merkley S.D., Goodfellow S.M., Guo Y., et al. Non-autophagy role of Atg5 and NBR1 in unconventional secretion of IL-12 prevents gut dysbiosis and inflammation. J Crohns Colitis. 2022;16:259–274. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wong M., Ganapathy A.S., Suchanec E., et al. Intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier regulation by autophagy-related protein ATG6/beclin 1. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2019;316:C753–C765. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00246.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shabkhizan R., Haiaty S., Moslehian M.S., et al. The beneficial and adverse effects of autophagic response to caloric restriction and fasting. Adv Nutr. 2023;14:1211–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mattson M.P., Longo V.D., Harvie M. Impact of intermittent fasting on health and disease processes. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:46–58. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sun L., Li Y.J., Yang X., et al. Effect of fasting therapy in chemotherapy-protection and tumorsuppression: a systematic review. Transl Cancer Res. 2017;6:354–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Teong X.T., Liu K., Vincent A.D., et al. Intermittent fasting plus early time-restricted eating versus calorie restriction and standard care in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2023;29:963–972. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02287-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kökten T., Hansmannel F., Ndiaye N.C., et al. Calorie restriction as a new treatment of inflammatory diseases. Adv Nutr. 2021;12:1558–1570. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abuelazm M.T., Mohamed I., Naeem A., et al. Intermittent fasting regimens for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;36:371–381. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Halling J.F., Pilegaard H. Autophagy-dependent beneficial effects of exercise. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jamart C., Benoit N., Raymackers J.M., et al. Autophagy-related and autophagy-regulatory genes are induced in human muscle after ultraendurance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3173–3177. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2287-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tachtsis B., Smiles W.J., Lane S.C., et al. Acute endurance exercise induces nuclear p53 abundance in human skeletal muscle. Front Physiol. 2016;7:144. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schwalm C., Jamart C., Benoit N., et al. Activation of autophagy in human skeletal muscle is dependent on exercise intensity and AMPK activation. FASEB J. 2015;29:3515–3526. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-267187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jamart C., Naslain D., Gilson H., et al. Higher activation of autophagy in skeletal muscle of mice during endurance exercise in the fasted state. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305:E964–E974. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00270.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Escobar K.A., Cole N.H., Mermier C.M., et al. Autophagy and aging: maintaining the proteome through exercise and caloric restriction. Aging Cell. 2019;18 doi: 10.1111/acel.12876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vainshtein A., Grumati P., Sandri M., et al. Skeletal muscle, autophagy, and physical activity: the menage a trois of metabolic regulation in health and disease. J Mol Med (Berl) 2014;92:127–137. doi: 10.1007/s00109-013-1096-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.He C., Bassik M.C., Moresi V., et al. Exercise-induced BCL2-regulated autophagy is required for muscle glucose homeostasis. Nature. 2012;481:511–515. doi: 10.1038/nature10758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.He C., Sumpter R., Jr., Levine B. Exercise induces autophagy in peripheral tissues and in the brain. Autophagy. 2012;8:1548–1551. doi: 10.4161/auto.21327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Williams P.A., Naughton K.E., Simon L.A., et al. Intestinal epithelial autophagy is required for the regenerative benefit of calorie restriction. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2023;324:G354–G368. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00248.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Levine B., Kroemer G. Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell. 2019;176:11–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wong Y.C., Holzbaur E.L.F. Optineurin is an autophagy receptor for damaged mitochondria in parkin-mediated mitophagy that is disrupted by an ALS-linked mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E4439–E4448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405752111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li F., Xie X., Wang Y., et al. Structural insights into the interaction and disease mechanism of neurodegenerative disease-associated optineurin and TBK1 proteins. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12708. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gstrein T., Edwards A., Přistoupilová A., et al. Mutations in Vps15 perturb neuronal migration in mice and are associated with neurodevelopmental disease in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:207–217. doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0053-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee J.-H., Yu W.H., Kumar A., et al. Lysosomal proteolysis and autophagy require presenilin 1 and are disrupted by alzheimer-related PS1 mutations. Cell. 2010;141:1146–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim M.J., Deng H.X., Wong Y.C., et al. The Parkinson's disease-linked protein TMEM230 is required for Rab8a-mediated secretory vesicle trafficking and retromer trafficking. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:729–741. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aflaki E., Westbroek W., Sidransky E. The complicated relationship between gaucher disease and parkinsonism: insights from a rare disease. Neuron. 2017;93:737–746. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reddy P.H., Yin X., Manczak M., et al. Mutant APP and amyloid beta-induced defective autophagy, mitophagy, mitochondrial structural and functional changes and synaptic damage in hippocampal neurons from Alzheimer's disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:2502–2516. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Raza S., Rajak S., Yen P.M., et al. Autophagy and hepatic lipid metabolism: mechanistic insight and therapeutic potential for MASLD. NPJ Metab Health Dis. 2024;2:19. doi: 10.1038/s44324-024-00022-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kwon Y., Kim J.W., Jeoung J.A., et al. Autophagy is pro-senescence when seen in close-up, but anti-senescence in long-shot. Mol Cells. 2017;40:607–612. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2017.0151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Simonsen A., Cumming R.C., Brech A., et al. Promoting basal levels of autophagy in the nervous system enhances longevity and oxidant resistance in adult Drosophila. Autophagy. 2008;4:176–184. doi: 10.4161/auto.5269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pyo J.O., Yoo S.M., Ahn H.H., et al. Overexpression of Atg5 in mice activates autophagy and extends lifespan. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2300. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ulgherait M., Rana A., Rera M., et al. AMPK modulates tissue and organismal aging in a non-cell-autonomous manner. Cell Rep. 2014;8:1767–1780. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gelino S., Chang J.T., Kumsta C., et al. Correction: intestinal autophagy improves healthspan and longevity in C. elegans during dietary restriction. PLoS Genet. 2016;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brandhorst S., Choi I.Y., Wei M., et al. A periodic diet that mimics fasting promotes multi-system regeneration, enhanced cognitive performance, and healthspan. Cell Metab. 2015;22:86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rangan P., Choi I., Wei M., et al. Fasting-mimicking diet modulates microbiota and promotes intestinal regeneration to reduce inflammatory bowel disease pathology. Cell Rep. 2019;26:2704–2719.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stekovic S., Hofer S.J., Tripolt N., et al. Alternate day fasting improves physiological and molecular markers of aging in healthy, non-obese humans. Cell Metab. 2019;30:462–476.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brandhorst S., Levine M.E., Wei M., et al. Fasting-mimicking diet causes hepatic and blood markers changes indicating reduced biological age and disease risk. Nat Commun. 2024;15:1309. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45260-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wei M., Brandhorst S., Shelehchi M., et al. Fasting-mimicking diet and markers/risk factors for aging, diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai8700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Asano J., Sato T., Ichinose S., et al. Intrinsic autophagy is required for the maintenance of intestinal stem cells and for irradiation-induced intestinal regeneration. Cell Rep. 2017;20:1050–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pickles S., Vigié P., Youle R.J. Mitophagy and quality control mechanisms in mitochondrial maintenance. Curr Biol. 2018;28:R170–R185. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Patel K.K., Miyoshi H., Beatty W.L., et al. Autophagy proteins control goblet cell function by potentiating reactive oxygen species production. EMBO J. 2013;32:3130–3144. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lassen K.G., Kuballa P., Conway K.L., et al. Atg16L1 T300A variant decreases selective autophagy resulting in altered cytokine signaling and decreased antibacterial defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:7741–7746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407001111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Adolph T.E., Tomczak M.F., Niederreiter L., et al. Paneth cells as a site of origin for intestinal inflammation. Nature. 2013;503:272–276. doi: 10.1038/nature12599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lavoie S., Conway K.L., Lassen K.G., et al. The Crohn's disease polymorphism, ATG16L1 T300A, alters the gut microbiota and enhances the local Th1/Th17 response. Elife. 2019;8 doi: 10.7554/eLife.39982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cadwell K., Liu J.Y., Brown S.L., et al. A key role for autophagy and the autophagy gene Atg16l1 in mouse and human intestinal Paneth cells. Nature. 2008;456:259–263. doi: 10.1038/nature07416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Conway K.L., Kuballa P., Song J.H., et al. Atg16l1 is required for autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells and protection of mice from Salmonella infection. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:1347–1357. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ganapathy A.S., Saha K., Suchanec E., et al. AP2M1 mediates autophagy-induced CLDN2 (claudin 2) degradation through endocytosis and interaction with LC3 and reduces intestinal epithelial tight junction permeability. Autophagy. 2021;18:1–18. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.2016233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Saha K., Ganapathy A.S., Wang A., et al. Autophagy reduces the degradation and promotes membrane localization of occludin to enhance the intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier against paracellular macromolecule flux. J Crohns Colitis. 2023;17(3):433–449. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Priyamvada S., Jayawardena D., Bhalala J., et al. Cryptosporidium parvum infection induces autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2021;23 doi: 10.1111/cmi.13298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hampe J., Franke A., Rosenstiel P., et al. A genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for Crohn disease in ATG16L1. Nat Genet. 2007;39:207–211. doi: 10.1038/ng1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rioux J.D., Xavier R.J., Taylor K.D., et al. Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for Crohn disease and implicates autophagy in disease pathogenesis. Nat Genet. 2007;39:596–604. doi: 10.1038/ng2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Simovic I., Hilmi I., Ng R.T., et al. ATG16L1 rs2241880/T300A increases susceptibility to perianal Crohn's disease: an updated meta-analysis on inflammatory bowel disease risk and clinical outcomes. United European Gastroenterol J. 2024;12:103–121. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Saitoh T., Fujita N., Jang M.H., et al. Loss of the autophagy protein Atg16L1 enhances endotoxin-induced IL-1beta production. Nature. 2008;456:264–268. doi: 10.1038/nature07383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Murthy A., Li Y., Peng I., et al. A Crohn's disease variant in Atg16l1 enhances its degradation by caspase 3. Nature. 2014;506:456–462. doi: 10.1038/nature13044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bel S., Pendse M., Wang Y., et al. Paneth cells secrete lysozyme via secretory autophagy during bacterial infection of the intestine. Science. 2017;357:1047–1052. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tschurtschenthaler M., Adolph T.E., Ashcroft J.W., et al. Defective ATG16L1-mediated removal of IRE1α drives Crohn's disease-like ileitis. J Exp Med. 2017;214:401–422. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chauhan S., Mandell M.A., Deretic V. Mechanism of action of the tuberculosis and Crohn disease risk factor IRGM in autophagy. Autophagy. 2016;12:429–431. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1084457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hui K.Y., Fernandez-Hernandez H., Hu J., et al. Functional variants in the LRRK2 gene confer shared effects on risk for Crohn's disease and Parkinson's disease. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai7795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lassen K.G., McKenzie C.I., Mari M., et al. Genetic coding variant in GPR65 alters lysosomal pH and links lysosomal dysfunction with colitis risk. Immunity. 2016;44:1392–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lahiri A., Hedl M., Abraham C. MTMR3 risk allele enhances innate receptor-induced signaling and cytokines by decreasing autophagy and increasing caspase-1 activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:10461–10466. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501752112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Scharl M., Wojtal K.A., Becker H.M., et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 2 regulates autophagosome formation in human intestinal cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1287–1302. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Spalinger M.R., Sayoc-Becerra A., Santos A.N., et al. PTPN2 regulates interactions between macrophages and intestinal epithelial cells to promote intestinal barrier function. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:1763–1777.e14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ellinghaus D., Zhang H., Zeissig S., et al. Association between variants of PRDM1 and NDP52 and Crohn's disease, based on exome sequencing and functional studies. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:339–347. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Franco L.H., Nair V.R., Scharn C.R., et al. The ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 functions in selective autophagy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and anti-tuberculous host defense. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21:59–72. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kaser A., Lee A.H., Franke A., et al. XBP1 links ER stress to intestinal inflammation and confers genetic risk for human inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2008;134:743–756. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Cadwell K., Patel K.K., Komatsu M., et al. A common role for Atg16L1, Atg5 and Atg7 in small intestinal Paneth cells and Crohn disease. Autophagy. 2009;5:250–252. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.2.7560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Heazlewood C.K., Cook M.C., Eri R., et al. Aberrant mucin assembly in mice causes endoplasmic reticulum stress and spontaneous inflammation resembling ulcerative colitis. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e54. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tréton X., Pédruzzi E., Cazals-Hatem D., et al. Altered endoplasmic reticulum stress affects translation in inactive colon tissue from patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1024–1035. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bertolotti A., Wang X., Novoa I., et al. Increased sensitivity to dextran sodium sulfate colitis in IRE1beta-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:585–593. doi: 10.1172/JCI11476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hino K., Saito A., Asada R., et al. Increased susceptibility to dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in the endoplasmic reticulum stress transducer OASIS deficient mice. PLoS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kruse K.B., Brodsky J.L., McCracken A.A. Characterization of an ERAD gene as VPS30/ATG6 reveals two alternative and functionally distinct protein quality control pathways: one for soluble Z variant of human alpha-1 proteinase inhibitor (A1PiZ) and another for aggregates of A1PiZ. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:203–212. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hetz C. The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:89–102. doi: 10.1038/nrm3270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cullinan S.B., Zhang D., Hannink M., et al. Nrf2 is a direct PERK substrate and effector of PERK-dependent cell survival. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:7198–7209. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.20.7198-7209.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Komatsu M., Kurokawa H., Waguri S., et al. The selective autophagy substrate p62 activates the stress responsive transcription factor Nrf2 through inactivation of Keap1. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:213–223. doi: 10.1038/ncb2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lau A., Wang X.J., Zhao F., et al. A noncanonical mechanism of Nrf2 activation by autophagy deficiency: direct interaction between Keap1 and p62. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:3275–3285. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00248-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Taguchi K., Fujikawa N., Komatsu M., et al. Keap1 degradation by autophagy for the maintenance of redox homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:13561–13566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121572109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Myers J.N., Schaffer M.W., Korolkova O.Y., et al. Implications of the colonic deposition of free hemoglobin-alpha chain: a previously unknown tissue by-product in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:1530–1547. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Turpin W., Lee S.H., Raygoza Garay J.A., et al. Increased intestinal permeability is associated with later development of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:2092–2100.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wyatt J., Vogelsang H., Hubl W., et al. Intestinal permeability and the prediction of relapse in Crohn's disease. Lancet. 1993;341:1437–1439. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90882-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Schmitz H., Barmeyer C., Fromm M., et al. Altered tight junction structure contributes to the impaired epithelial barrier function in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:301–309. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70126-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zeissig S., Burgel N., Gunzel D., et al. Changes in expression and distribution of claudin 2, 5 and 8 lead to discontinuous tight junctions and barrier dysfunction in active Crohn's disease. Gut. 2007;56:61–72. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.094375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Nighot P.K., Hu C.A., Ma T.Y. Autophagy enhances intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier function by targeting claudin-2 protein degradation. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:7234–7246. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.597492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kabat A.M., Pott J., Maloy K.J. The mucosal immune system and its regulation by autophagy. Front Immunol. 2016;7:240. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ogawa M., Yoshimori T., Suzuki T., et al. Escape of intracellular Shigella from autophagy. Science. 2005;307:727–731. doi: 10.1126/science.1106036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Birmingham C.L., Canadien V., Gouin E., et al. Listeria monocytogenes evades killing by autophagy during colonization of host cells. Autophagy. 2007;3:442–451. doi: 10.4161/auto.4450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wu W., Luo X., Ren M. Clearance or hijack: universal interplay mechanisms between viruses and host autophagy from plants to animals. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.786348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kabat A.M., Harrison O.J., Riffelmacher T., et al. The autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation. Elife. 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/eLife.12444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Paul S., Kashyap A.K., Jia W., et al. Selective autophagy of the adaptor protein Bcl10 modulates T cell receptor activation of NF-κB. Immunity. 2012;36:947–958. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.López-Soto A., Bravo-San Pedro J.M., Kroemer G., et al. Involvement of autophagy in NK cell development and function. Autophagy. 2017;13:633–636. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1274486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Pengo N., Scolari M., Oliva L., et al. Plasma cells require autophagy for sustainable immunoglobulin production. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:298–305. doi: 10.1038/ni.2524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Cosin-Roger J., Canet F., Macias-Ceja D.C., et al. Autophagy stimulation as a potential strategy against intestinal fibrosis. Cells. 2019;8 doi: 10.3390/cells8091078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Mathur R., Alam M.M., Zhao X.F., et al. Induction of autophagy in Cx3cr1(+) mononuclear cells limits IL-23/IL-22 axis-mediated intestinal fibrosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12:612–623. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0146-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Holvoet T., Devriese S., Castermans K., et al. Treatment of intestinal fibrosis in experimental inflammatory bowel disease by the pleiotropic actions of a local rho kinase inhibitor. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:1054–1067. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zeng C., Liu X., Xiong D., et al. Resolvin D1 prevents epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reduces collagen deposition by stimulating autophagy in intestinal fibrosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67:4749–4759. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07356-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yu M., Zhu W., Wang J., et al. Caveolin-1 alleviates Crohn's disease–induced intestinal fibrosis by inhibiting fibroblasts autophagy through modulating sequestosome 1. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022;28:923–935. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izab342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Weber S., Sitte S., Voegele A.L., et al. NLRP3 inhibition leads to impaired mucosal fibroblast function in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. J Crohns Colitis. 2024;18:446–461. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yang L., Liu C., Zhao W., et al. Impaired autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells alters gut microbiota and host immune responses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00880-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Tsuboi K., Nishitani M., Takakura A., et al. Autophagy protects against colitis by the maintenance of normal gut microflora and secretion of mucus. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:20511–20526. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.632257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Imhann F., Vich Vila A., Bonder M.J., et al. Interplay of host genetics and gut microbiota underlying the onset and clinical presentation of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2018;67:108–119. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhang H., Zheng L., McGovern D.P., et al. Myeloid ATG16L1 facilitates host-bacteria interactions in maintaining intestinal homeostasis. J Immunol. 2017;198:2133–2146. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sadaghian Sadabad M., Regeling A., de Goffau M.C., et al. The ATG16L1-T300A allele impairs clearance of pathosymbionts in the inflamed ileal mucosa of Crohn's disease patients. Gut. 2015;64:1546–1552. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Donohoe D.R., Garge N., Zhang X., et al. The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon. Cell Metab. 2011;13:517–526. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Cheng S., Ma X., Geng S., et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation beneficially regulates intestinal mucosal autophagy and alleviates gut barrier injury. mSystems. 2018;3 doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00137-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Larabi A., Barnich N., Nguyen H.T.T. New insights into the interplay between autophagy, gut microbiota and inflammatory responses in IBD. Autophagy. 2020;16:38–51. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1635384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wang Z., Li S., Cao Y., et al. Oxidative stress and carbonyl lesions in ulcerative colitis and associated colorectal cancer. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/9875298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Guo W., Sun Y., Liu W., et al. Small molecule-driven mitophagy-mediated NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition is responsible for the prevention of colitis-associated cancer. Autophagy. 2014;10:972–985. doi: 10.4161/auto.28374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Liu M., Sun T., Li N., et al. BRG1 attenuates colonic inflammation and tumorigenesis through autophagy-dependent oxidative stress sequestration. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4614. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12573-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Salesse L., Lucas C., Hoang M.H.T., et al. Colibactin-producing Escherichia coli induce the formation of invasive carcinomas in a chronic inflammation-associated mouse model. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:2060. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Yamamoto K., Venida A., Yano J., et al. Autophagy promotes immune evasion of pancreatic cancer by degrading MHC-I. Nature. 2020;581:100–105. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2229-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ni H.M., Chao X., Yang H., et al. Dual roles of mammalian target of rapamycin in regulating liver injury and tumorigenesis in autophagy-defective mouse liver. Hepatology. 2019;70:2142–2155. doi: 10.1002/hep.30770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sun K., Guo X.L., Zhao Q.D., et al. Paradoxical role of autophagy in the dysplastic and tumor-forming stages of hepatocarcinoma development in rats. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4 doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Rosenfeldt M.T., O'Prey J., Morton J.P., et al. p53 status determines the role of autophagy in pancreatic tumour development. Nature. 2013;504:296–300. doi: 10.1038/nature12865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Rehman S.K., Haynes J., Collignon E., et al. Colorectal cancer cells enter a diapause-like DTP state to survive chemotherapy. Cell. 2021;184:226–242.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Liu S., Yao S., Yang H., et al. Autophagy: regulator of cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:648. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-06154-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Young M.M., Takahashi Y., Khan O., et al. Autophagosomal membrane serves as platform for intracellular death-inducing signaling complex (iDISC)-mediated caspase-8 activation and apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:12455–12468. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.309104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Yang L., Li P., Fu S., et al. Defective hepatic autophagy in obesity promotes ER stress and causes insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2010;11:467–478. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Singh R., Kaushik S., Wang Y., et al. Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Nature. 2009;458:1131–1135. doi: 10.1038/nature07976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Wang Y., Singh R., Xiang Y., et al. Macroautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy are required for hepatocyte resistance to oxidant stress. Hepatology. 2010;52:266–277. doi: 10.1002/hep.23645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Lin H.Z., Yang S.Q., Chuckaree C., et al. Metformin reverses fatty liver disease in obese, leptin-deficient mice. Nat Med. 2000;6:998–1003. doi: 10.1038/79697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Yang N., Dang S., Shi J., et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester attenuates liver fibrosis via inhibition of TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway and induction of autophagy pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;486:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.02.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ma J.Q., Sun Y.Z., Ming Q.L., et al. Ampelopsin attenuates carbon tetrachloride-induced mouse liver fibrosis and hepatic stellate cell activation associated with the SIRT1/TGF-β1/Smad3 and autophagy pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;77 doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zhang Z., Yao Z., Zhao S., et al. Interaction between autophagy and senescence is required for dihydroartemisinin to alleviate liver fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Ahmad R., Kumar B., Chen Z., et al. Loss of claudin-3 expression induces IL6/gp130/Stat3 signaling to promote colon cancer malignancy by hyperactivating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Oncogene. 2017;36:6592–6604. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Zhang X.L., Chen Z.N., Huang Q.F., et al. Methyl helicterate inhibits hepatic stellate cell activation through modulation of apoptosis and autophagy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;51:897–908. doi: 10.1159/000495390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Gao J., Wei B., de Assuncao T.M., et al. Hepatic stellate cell autophagy inhibits extracellular vesicle release to attenuate liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2020;73:1144–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zhang X.W., Zhou J.C., Peng D., et al. Disrupting the TRIB3-SQSTM1 interaction reduces liver fibrosis by restoring autophagy and suppressing exosome-mediated HSC activation. Autophagy. 2020;16:782–796. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1635383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Czaja M.J. Function of autophagy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:1304–1313. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-4025-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Stine J.G., Xu D., Schmitz K., et al. Exercise attenuates ribosomal protein six phosphorylation in fatty liver disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65:3238–3243. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06226-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hernández–Gea V., Ghiassi–Nejad Z., Rozenfeld R., et al. Autophagy releases lipid that promotes fibrogenesis by activated hepatic stellate cells in mice and in human tissues. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:938–946. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Erlangga Z., Ghashang S.K., Hamdan I., et al. The effect of prolonged intermittent fasting on autophagy, inflammasome and senescence genes expressions: an exploratory study in healthy young males. Hum Nutr Metab. 2023;32 [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Byun S., Seok S., Kim Y.C., et al. Fasting-induced FGF21 signaling activates hepatic autophagy and lipid degradation via JMJD3 histone demethylase. Nat Commun. 2020;11:807. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14384-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Stine J.G., Long M.T., Corey K.E., et al. Physical activity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a roundtable statement from the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023;55:1717–1726. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Puleston D.J., Zhang H., Powell T.J., et al. Autophagy is a critical regulator of memory CD8(+) T cell formation. Elife. 2014;3 doi: 10.7554/eLife.03706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Wang J., Whiteman M.W., Lian H., et al. A non-canonical MEK/ERK signaling pathway regulates autophagy via regulating Beclin 1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:21412–21424. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.026013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Yu Y., Shiou S.R., Guo Y., et al. Erythropoietin protects epithelial cells from excessive autophagy and apoptosis in experimental neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Scharl M., Paul G., Barrett K.E., et al. AMP-activated protein kinase mediates the interferon-gamma-induced decrease in intestinal epithelial barrier function. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:27952–27963. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.046292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Tung H.C., Kim J.W., Zhu J., et al. Inhibition of heme-thiolate monooxygenase CYP1B1 prevents hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis by accumulating trehalose. Sci Transl Med. 2024;16 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk8446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Lu S.Y., Guo S., Chai S.B., et al. Autophagy in gastric mucosa: the dual role and potential therapeutic target. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/2648065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Liu T.C., Kern J.T., VanDussen K.L., et al. Interaction between smoking and ATG16L1T300A triggers Paneth cell defects in Crohn's disease. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:5110–5122. doi: 10.1172/JCI120453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Sun S., Hodel M., Wang X., et al. Macrophage LRRK2 hyperactivity impairs autophagy and induces Paneth cell dysfunction. Sci Immunol. 2024;9 doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adi7907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Umemura A., He F., Taniguchi K., et al. p62, upregulated during preneoplasia, induces hepatocellular carcinogenesis by maintaining survival of stressed HCC-initiating cells. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:935–948. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Yue Y., Zhang Q., Wang X., et al. STAT3 regulates 5-Fu resistance in human colorectal cancer cells by promoting Mcl-1-dependent cytoprotective autophagy. Cancer Sci. 2023;114:2293–2305. doi: 10.1111/cas.15761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Mariño G., Niso-Santano M., Baehrecke E.H., et al. Self-consumption: the interplay of autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:81–94. doi: 10.1038/nrm3735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Klionsky D.J., Abdalla F.C., Abeliovich H., et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8:445–544. doi: 10.4161/auto.19496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Pietrocola F., Demont Y., Castoldi F., et al. Metabolic effects of fasting on human and mouse blood in vivo. Autophagy. 2017;13:567–578. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1271513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Bensalem J., Hattersley K.J., Hein L.K., et al. Measurement of autophagic flux in humans: an optimized method for blood samples. Autophagy. 2021;17:3238–3255. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1846302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Hooper K.M., Barlow P.G., Stevens C., et al. Inflammatory bowel disease drugs: a focus on autophagy. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:118–127. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Levin A.D., Koelink P.J., Bloemendaal F.M., et al. Autophagy contributes to the induction of anti-TNF induced macrophages. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;10:323–329. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Shen S., Niso-Santano M., Adjemian S., et al. Cytoplasmic STAT3 represses autophagy by inhibiting PKR activity. Mol Cell. 2012;48:667–680. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Dumortier J., Lapalus M.G., Guillaud O., et al. Everolimus for refractory Crohn's disease: a case report. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:874–877. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Massey D.C., Bredin F., Parkes M. Use of sirolimus (rapamycin) to treat refractory Crohn's disease. Gut. 2008;57:1294–1296. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.157297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Reinisch W., Panés J., Lémann M., et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of everolimus versus azathioprine and placebo to maintain steroid-induced remission in patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2284–2292. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gastro Hep Advances are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES