TABLE 11.
Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of P. magnus
| Reference and MIC type | No. of strains tested | MIC (mg/liter)a
|
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MZ | Pen | Amox | AmoxCl | TicCl | Pip | PipTaz | Cefox | Imi | Clin | Cip | Trova | ||
| Aldridge et al., 1983 (2) | 10 | ||||||||||||
| Range | <0.25–1 | <0.125–0.25 | 0.125–0.25 | ||||||||||
| MIC50 | <0.25 | 0.125 | 0.125 | ||||||||||
| Sanchez et al., 1992 (230) | 38 | ||||||||||||
| MIC50 | 0.038 | ||||||||||||
| MIC90 | >256 | ||||||||||||
| Reig and Baquero, 1994 (222) | 24 | ||||||||||||
| Range | 0.03–0.25 | 0.03–2 | 0.03–2 | 0.06–0.5 | 0.06–0.25 | ||||||||
| Mode | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.12 | ||||||||
| Sheikh et al., 1993 (236) | 14 | ||||||||||||
| Range | 0.06–2 | 0.016–0.5 | <0.008–0.06 | 0.016–64 | |||||||||
| MIC50 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.008 | 0.03 | |||||||||
| MIC90 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 1 | |||||||||
| Johnson et al., 1995 (145) | 20 | ||||||||||||
| MIC50 | 1 | 0.12 | 1 | 0.5 | |||||||||
| MIC90 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |||||||||
| Bowker et al., 1996 (15) | 36 | ||||||||||||
| Range | 0.008–0.06 | 0.015–0.06 | 0.015–0.25 | 0.12–0.5 | 0.06–0.5 | 0.008–0.12 | 0.06–8 | 0.015–0.5 | 0.015–0.25 | ||||
| MIC50 | 0.015 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.06 | ||||
| MIC90 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.25 | ||||
a
MZ, metronidazole; Pen, penicillin G; Amox, amoxicillin; AmoxCl, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; TicCl, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid; Pip, piperacillin; PipTaz, piperacillin-tazobactam; Cefox, cefoxitin; Imi, imipenem; Clin, clindamycin; Cip, ciprofloxacin; Trova, trovafloxacin.