Abstract
Mitochondrial dysfunction is an expected cause of etiology and progression in numerous human neurological pathologies, including stroke, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's diseases. Therefore, a neuroprotective treatment is an urgent and unmet need. Transition metal dichalcogenide nanoflowers (TMD NFs) exhibit unique biological properties. However, neuroprotective properties of these nanomaterials remain poorly understood. In the current study, the biological effect of molybdenum disulfide and molybdenum diselenide TMD NFs on neurons and astrocytes was investigated. It was found that both nanomaterials lowered reactive oxygen species levels, reduced mitochondrial impairment, and increased mitochondrial biogenesis. Neuroprotective effects of both TMD NFs resulted from upregulation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha pathway, the biological system responsible for mitochondrial biogenesis. Furthermore, administration of TMD NFs to Caenorhabditis elegans extended lifespan of the nematodes. These results indicate that TMD NFs can be used as novel neuroprotective therapeutic agents against acute and chronic neurological condition linked to mitochondrial dysfunction.
Keywords: molybdenum disulfide, molybdenum diselenide, neurons, ROS, mitochondria
Neurological conditions are pathologies that affect central and peripheral nervous systems. There are over 600 known neurological diseases that can be broadly categorized into three subtypes: neurotraumatic, neurodegenerative, and neuropsychiatric diseases (1, 2). Neurological conditions exhibit excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation linked to irreversible changes in mitochondrial homeostasis (2, 3, 4). Mitochondria have long been direct targets for therapeutic treatments, via targeting mitochondria’s role in apoptosis in cancer (5), reducing reactive oxygen species in neurodegenerative diseases (6, 7), and achieving and stabilizing normal physiological function in direct mitochondrial diseases, like Barth syndrome (8) and primary mitochondrial myopathies (9). Researchers target the mitochondria under the guise that by balancing mitochondria metabolism and mitophagy, maintaining calcium ion (Ca2+) concentration within the mitochondria, and regulating mitochondrial dynamics, these therapeutics can create an antiaging and neuroprotective effect in the patient (10). Certain genes responsible for mitochondrial biogenesis (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha [PGC-1α]) (11, 12, 13), mitochondrial dynamics (14, 15), and calcium homeostasis (IP3R) (16, 17) have been privy to multiple studies. While there are many ongoing studies for novel therapeutics, no current therapeutic treatment achieves the unmet need of neuroprotection (18).
Transition metal dichalcogenide nanoflowers (TMD NFs), including molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2), are novel nanomaterials that exhibit high surface-to-volume ratio via self-organization of individual sheets into higher coordinated structures (19). Although optical, electronic, and photocatalytic properties of TMD NFs are well characterized, biological activity of these nanostructures remains poorly understood. Several pieces of evidence indicate that TMD NFs showed promising therapeutic effects in cancer biology and neurodegenerative diseases (20, 21).
In the current study, the extent to which MoS2 and MoSe2 could enact neuroprotective properties to neurons and astrocytes was studied. Our results showed TMD NFs reduced mitochondrial impairment via suppression of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in vitro. Furthermore, administration of TMD NFs to Caenorhabditis elegans extended lifespan of the nematodes.
Results and discussion
MoS2 and MoSe2 TMDs were synthesized using hydrothermal synthesis in teflon-lined autoclaves. Scanning electron microscope revealed that both TMDs were assembled into dense NF-like structures with characteristically high surface area-to-volume ratio, with MoS2 measured between 300 and 600 nm and MoSe2 less than ∼1 μm (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
SEM images of both MoS2 (left) and MoSe2 (right) nanoflowers. The magnification of each image increases from 3000 X (A) to 50,000 X (D) for MoS2, and from 2700 X (E) to 20,000 X (H) for MoSe2. Each NF type displays the characteristic ridged surface that lends to a very high surface area-to-volume ratio. MoS2, molybdenum disulfide; MoSe2, molybdenum diselenide; SEM, scanning electron microscope.
Cellular uptake of NFs was confirmed via both Raman spectroscopy and fluorescent imaging. Cells were treated with 10% solutions of respective concentrations of MoS2 and MoSe2 and allowed to incubate for 24 h. Raman spectra were acquired with a 532 nm laser from individual cells exposed to NFs and the dry NFs material. Raman spectra of dry MoS2 exhibited two peaks centered at 385 and 405 cm-1 that correspond to E2g and A1g vibrations of MoS2 (22), (Fig. 2). The same vibrational bands were observed in Raman spectra acquired from cells exposed to MoS2. These results indicate that analyzed cells possessed MoS2 NFs. Fluorescent imaging confirmed the presence of NFs in N27 neurons, DI astrocytes, and CTX astrocytes, (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
Cellular uptake of TMD NFs into neurons and astrocytes.Left: Collected Raman spectra in the 300 to 500 wavenumber region for (A) powdered MoS2 NFs, (B) plated control N27 neurons, (C) plated N27 neurons treated with MoS2 NFs, and (D) the subtracted spectra from (B and C). Right: Fluorescent cell imaging of rat N27 neurons (top row), DI TNC1 astrocytes (middle row), and CTX TNA2 astrocytes (bottom row) when administered no NFs (first column), MoS2 NFs (middle column), or MoSe2 NFs (last column). MoS2, molybdenum disulfide; MoSe2, molybdenum diselenide; NF, nanoflower.
Cellular growth curve assays determined the extent to which TMD NFs altered cell proliferation. The number of N27, DI, and CTX cells was determined at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h posttreatment with TMDs. N27, DI, and CTX cells treated with MoS2 experienced a significant boost in cell count within the first 24 h, (Fig. 3). Specifically, rat N27 neurons exhibited a 93.2% increase in cell number, while both the rat DI TNC1 and CTX TNA2 astrocytes showed a smaller increase in the rate of cell proliferation, 29.2% and 27.4%, respectively. Although all cell types initially underwent a significant increase in the cell count within the first 24 h, no significant changes in the rate of cell proliferation were observed at the following 48 h and 72 h. These results indicated that MoSe2 strongly enhanced the cell proliferation only within the first 24 h after their introduction to N27, DI, and CTX cells.
Figure 3.
Effects of TMDs on cellular proliferation and cell growth. Growth curve assays of healthy rat brain cell types treated with MoS2 (A) and MoSe2 (B). Rat N27 neurons (green), rat DI TNC1 (gray), and rat CTX TNA2 (blue) were all treated with solutions of 0.5 mg/ml NFs and counted after 24, 48, and 72 h. Proliferation assay utilizing alamarBlue reagent to determine the proliferation of all tested cell types when treated for 6 h with MoS2 (C) and MoSe2 (D). Rat N27 neurons (green), rat DI TNC1 (gray), and rat CTX TNA2 (blue) were all treated with solutions of 0.1 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, or 1.0 mg/ml of NFs then received alamarBlue for testing. MoS2, molybdenum disulfide; MoSe2, molybdenum diselenide; NF, nanoflower.
Similarly, N27, DI, and CTX cells treated with MoSe2 experienced a significant initial increase in cell count, (Fig. 3). N27 neurons exhibited a 34.7%, while DI TNC1 astrocytes demonstrated a 14.2% increase in total counted cell number within the first 24 h. Cellular growth curve assay revealed the highest boost (36.9% increase) in the proliferation of CTX TNA2 astrocytes after the first 24 h of cell exposure. Similarly to MoS2, none of the tested cell types experienced a significant difference in total cell number after 48 h of their exposure to MoSe2 TMDs. After 72 h, a significant increase in total number of cells was observed only for CTX astrocytes, whereas no significant changes in the cell counts were evident for N27 and DI cells. These results indicated that both neurons and astrocytes exhibited similar increases in cell proliferation within the first 24 h after addition of MoS2 and MoSe2 to the cell media. However, observed differences in the cell proliferation of CTX astrocytes exposed to MoS2 and MoSe2 at 24 h and 72 h stages suggests the magnitude of cell proliferation was linked to the chemical nature of TMDs.
An alamarBlue assay was used to assess changes in the proliferation of N27, DI, and CTX cells after 6 h of after administration of both MoS2 and MoSe2 (Fig. 3). AlamarBlue revealed no significant changes in the reducing potential of N27, DI, and CTX cells exposed to MoS2 compared to control cells. This result indicated that MoS2 NFs did not exhibit any detrimental effects on the brain cells. On average, N27, DI, and CTX cells duplicate every 12 h. Consequently, our results also indicate that MoS2 enhance viability and, consequently, property to replicate between 6 and 12 h after cell exposition to TMDs.
Similarly to MoS2, neuronal cells exposed to low concentrations of MoSe2 showed no changes in the reducing potential within the first 6 h (Fig. 3). However, at 1.0 mg/ml concentration of MoSe2, a decrease in 11.2% of the cell reducing potential was observed. These results indicate that high concentration of MoSe2 can cause slight detrimental effects on cell proliferation potential. These effects were not evidence for DI astrocytes. At the same time, CTX astrocytes positively responded on MoSe2 treatment exhibiting an increase in the reducing potential. These results demonstrate that different cell types exhibit slightly different responses on the treatment with TMDs.
Cells that received MoS2 treatments exhibited substantially lower ROS levels than the control, (Fig. 4). Specifically, N27 neurons exposed to 0.1 mg/ml of MoS2 demonstrated a 25.8% decrease in ROS levels. As the concentration of MoS2 in the cell media increased to 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml, there was a reciprocal decrease of ROS in N27 neurons by 43.8% and 74.2%, respectively. In DI astrocytes, a 9.7% decrease in ROS was observed for the lowest concentration of MoS2. The cells treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml of MoS2 exhibited a greater magnitude of the decrease in the ROS levels (35.5% and 38.8%, accordingly). CTX astrocytes treated with 0.1 mg/ml MoS2 experienced an 11.4% decrease in the ROS, whereas the cells treated with 0.5 mg/ml and 1.0 mg/ml of MoS2 had 36.2% and 51.3% lower ROS levels than the control.
Figure 4.
Mitochondrial effects induced by TMD NFs in neurons and astrocytes. Reactive oxygen species assay using CellROX reagent to understand the effects that MoS2 (A) and MoSe2 (B) nanoflowers have on the ROS of N27 neurons (green), DI astrocytes (gray), and CTX astrocytes (blue). Relative mitochondrial health assay using JC-1 to measure the percent of green monomer units of the dye in N27, DI, and CTX cells after treatment with MoS2 (C) and MoSe2 (D). Performed ELISA for the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH-A) and cytochrome c oxidase 1 (COX-1) proteins to quantify the mitochondrial proteins present as a result of TMD NF treatments. The graphs depict the absorbance measured from the ELISA for SDH-A (darker color) and COX-1 (lighter color) for N27 neurons, DI astrocytes, and CTX astrocytes when treated with MoS2 (E) and MoSe2 (F). MoS2, molybdenum disulfide; MoSe2, molybdenum diselenide; TMD, transition metal dichalcogenide.
Cells treated with MoSe2 experienced a suppressed production of (Fig. 4). Compared to other cell types, N27 cells experienced the strongest suppression of ROS levels. When treated with 0.1 mg/ml of MoSe2, N27 neurons exhibited 37.5% decrease in ROS compared to the control. Furthermore, 70.3% and 80.4% suppression in ROS levels was observed in neurons treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml MoSe2, respectively. In DI astrocytes, the trend of decreasing ROS was observed. When treated with 0.1 mg/ml MoSe2, there was a 12.9% decrease in measured ROS. As the concentration of administered NFs increased to 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml, the cells demonstrated 43.8% and 59.8% decreases in ROS levels, respectively. After receiving the lowest dose of MoSe2, the CTX cells experienced a reported 32.6% decrease in overall ROS. As the dosage concentration increased to 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml MoSe2, the cells showed significant 46.6% and 67.9% decreases in ROS, respectively.
The extent of mitochondrial impairment in neurons and astrocytes was measured using JC-1. Administration of MoS2 treatment lowered mitochondrial impairment in N27 neurons, (Fig. 4). Cells exposed to 0.1 mg/ml of MoS2 exhibited 21.4% lower damage of cell mitochondria than the control. JC-1 assays revealed that 83.7% and 98.9%, suppression of mitochondrial impairment was observed in N27 neurons exposed to 0.5 mg/ml and 1.0 mg/ml of MoS2, respectively. Thus, MoS2 helped to decelerate the progression of naturally occurring mitochondrial damage. In DI astrocytes, the lowest concentration (0.1 mg/ml) resulted in 11.7% decrease in mitochondrial impairment. DI astrocytes treated with 0.5 mg/ml of MoS2 experienced a 49.8% decrease in the mitochondrial damage, whereas a 90.8% decrease in the organelle impairment was observed for DI astrocytes treated with 1.0 mg/ml of MoS2. CTX astrocytes treated with 0.1 and 0.5 mg/ml exhibited much lower magnitude of mitochondrial survival equal to 4.1% and 10.9%, respectively. At the highest concentration of MoS2 (1.0 mg/ml), however, there was a significant 50.7% decrease in mitochondrial impairment in CTX astrocytes.
Similarly, N27 neurons that received MoSe2 treatments exhibited 20.6% increase in the mitochondrial survival compared to the control, whereas cell exposed to 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml of MoSe2 demonstrated 87.3% and 99.1% suppression of mitochondrial damage, (Fig. 4). DI astrocytes did not exhibit a significant change in the mitochondrial impairment when treated with the lowest concentration of MoSe2, but a significant decrease in the mitochondrial damage (72.8% and 98.5%, respectively) was observed in DI astrocytes treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml of MoSe2. CTX astrocytes did not exhibit any significant changes when treated with 0.1 and 0.5 mg/ml of MoSe2. However, 85.2% increase in the suppression of mitochondrial impairment in CTX astrocytes treated with 1.0 mg/ml of MoSe2.
The experiments described above thus far have shown the phenotypic effects that TMD NF treatments induce. To better elucidate the mechanistic effects resulting from TMD NF exposure, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and quantitative PCRs (qPCRs) were conducted.
The utilized in-cell ELISA detects treatment-induced effects on mitochondrial biogenesis via measurement of two mitochondrial proteins: nuclear encoded succinate dehydrogenase subunit A (SDH-A) and mitochondrial encoded cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COX-I). N27 neurons experienced an increase in both SDH-A and COX-I levels for all tested concentrations of MoS2 NFs, (Fig. 4). Treatments with 0.1 mg/ml MoS2 yielded the smallest increase in both SDH-A and COX-I, with only a 2.9% and 9.8% increase in the respective protein levels. The higher concentration treatments induced much higher increases, with the 0.5 mg/ml resulting in 13.4% and 37.0% increases in SDH-A and COX-I, while the 1.0 mg/ml treatment gave rise to 7.2% and 38.2% increases, respectively. The DI astrocytes that received MoS2 treatments did not exhibit any significant changes in SDH-A or COX-I expression levels. The CTX astrocytes received MoS2 experienced increases in both SDH-A and COX-I levels at every test concentration, similarly to the N27 neurons. At the 0.1 mg/ml concentration, there were minor increases of 0.5% and 6.6% in SDH-A and COX-I respectively. As the treatment concentrations increased, there were significant increases of 4.3% and 12.4% respectively for the 0.5 mg/ml group, and significant 7.2% and 19.1%, respectively, increased for the 1.0 mg/ml group.
When treated with MoSe2 NFs, N27 experienced a dosage dependent increase in both SDH-A and COX-I levels, (Fig. 4). At the lowest concentration of 0.1 mg/ml, there was a measured increase of 1.9% and 1.4% in SDH-A and COX-I respectively. As the concentration increased to 0.5 mg/ml, there was significant increases of 6.5% and 10.1% of the respective proteins. At the highest concentration of 1.0 mg/ml, there was the highest significant increases of 18.2% and 35.1%, respectively. The DI astrocytes treated with MoSe2 also experienced a dose-dependent increase of SDH-A and COX-I levels, although not as significantly as N27 neurons. At the lowest concentration of 0.1 mg/ml, there was only slight 0.3% and 1.5% respective increases in SDH-A and COX-I. When treated with the 0.5 mg/ml concentration, there were 5.8% and 9.1% increases in the respective protein levels. The only significant increases were measured when treated with 1.0 mg/ml MoSe2, with a positive change of 14.0% and 22.6%, respectively. The measured effects of MoSe2 were greater in CTX astrocytes over the MoS2 treatments. At the 0.1 mg/ml concentration, there was a slight increase of 2.5% and 7.7% in SDH-A and COX-I, respectively. At the 0.5 mg/ml concentration, there were significant increases of 10.5% and 18.2%, respectively. At the highest concentration of 1.0 mg/ml, the significant increases in protein levels were measured at 28.5% and 44.6%, respectively.
Recently reported studies by the Gaharwar group (23) showed that MoS2 NFs exhibiting different atomic vacancies triggered upregulation of PGC-1α. PGC-1α pathway is directly responsible for mitochondrial biogenesis in the cell and thus, plays key roles in other processes such as ROS regulation, glucose utilization, fatty acid oxidation, and antioxidant detoxification, (Fig. 5). Therefore, qPCR was utilized to quantify changes in the expression of proteins in this pathway when exposed to both MoS2 and MoSe2 NFs.
Figure 5.
Diagram of the PGC-1α biological pathway with important core components shown. Custom qPCR primers were generated for all components shaded blue. Green arrows indicate measured upregulation, while red arrows indicate measured downregulation. PGC-1α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha; qPCR, quantitative PCR.
The central component of the pathway, PGC-1α, is regulated by the sirtuin (SIRT)1 protein. The Gaharwar group reported an upregulation of SIRT1 and PGC-1α expression in response to MoS2 administration (23). In another upstream arm of the pathway, steroid receptor coactivator-3 (SRC-3) monitors energy excess and acts as a coactivator of nuclear receptors and transcription factors (24). SRC-3 is positive feedback regulator of general control nondepressible 5 (GCN5) that inhibits PGC-1α and downregulates its expression through acetylation (25). Both SRC-3 and GCN5 were both downregulated when administered MoS2 and MoSe2 NFs, with MoS2 resulting in a greater downregulation in both genes. SRC-3 only had 36.0% and 81.3% expression after exposure to MoS2 and MoSe2. GCN5 expression was reduced to 76.5% with MoS2 and did not change in response to MoSe2.
PGC-1α suppresses ROS activity by activation of SIRT3 and estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRα) (26). Our results showed that MoSe2 suppressed ROS more efficiently than MoS2 NFs in neurons. Indeed, qPCR revealed that SIRT3 was 5% and 31% upregulated in cells exposed to MoS2 and MoSe2 NFs, respectively. Consequently, ERRα experienced an 89% and 7.8-fold upregulation when administer MoS2 and MoSe2 NFs.
PGC-1α regulates multiple cellular processes, such as uncoupling proteins, fatty acid oxidation, glucose utilization, antioxidants detoxification, and mitochondrial biogenesis (26, 27) via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, gamma, and delta (PPAR α/γ/δ), ERR α/β/γ, and nuclear respiratory factor 1 and 2 (NRF 1/2). qPCR revealed that in neurons exposed to TMD NFs, the expression of these protein groups was strongly upregulated to varying magnitudes. Analysis of qPCR for PPARα and PPARδ showed that MoSe2 triggered a greater upregulation of these genes versus MoS2. Specifically, PPARα experienced a 3.9-fold and 3.4-fold, respectively, while PPARδ 2.2-fold and 27% increases. PPARγ had the inverse effect, with MoS2 causing a higher upregulation than MoSe2. Analysis revealed 6.2-fold and 3.9-fold increases in expression, respectively. As previously stated, ERRα experienced a higher upregulation in response to MoSe2 over MoS2. Contrarily, ERRβ experienced a higher upregulation when administered MoS2 than MoSe2, with 74.6% and 40.1% measured increases. Lastly, investigation into changes in the expression of NRF2 was conducted. When administered MoS2, NRF2 had a modest upregulation of only 7.5%, but had a steeper upregulation of 51.9% when treated with MoSe2.
C. elegans are a well-established, multicellular model organism (28) broadly utilized to investigate neurological effects and toxicity of molecular analytes (29, 30), tracking developmental stages of neuronal networks in embryos (31), as well as molecular mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases (32). A WT N2 C. elegans strain was used to investigate the extent to which TMD NFs on could alter the lifespan of the worms.
The C. elegans that received MoS2 supplementation did not experience a great shift in survival expectancy (p = 50%). The MoS2 supplemented worms had a calculated survival expectancy of 18 ± 2 days, as shown in (Fig. 6). The 0.1 mg/ml MoS2 group had a slightly lower p = 50% at 16 days. As the concentration of MoS2 increased, the 0.5 mg/ml and 1.0 mg/ml groups experienced higher p = 50% values of 19 days and 20 days, respectively. These two groups exceeded the survival expectancy of the healthy control worms, which experienced a survival expectancy of 18 days.
Figure 6.
Calculated Kaplan–Meier life expectancy curves of C. elegans that were administered different concentrations of MoS2 NFs (left) and MoSe2 NFs (right). MoS2, molybdenum disulfide; MoSe2, molybdenum diselenide; NF, nanoflower.
The C. elegans that received MoSe2 supplementation experienced a much greater shift in survival expectancy. The MoSe2 supplemented worms had a calculated survival expectancy of 22 ± 1.7 days, as shown in (Fig. 6). All concentrations of MoSe2 supplementation resulted in an increase in survival expectancy over the healthy control groups. Both the 0.1 mg/ml and 0.5 mg/ml had a calculated p = 50% value of 21 days, 3 days higher than the control. The group that experienced the greatest change in p = 50% was the 1.0 mg/ml MoSe2 worms, with a survival expectancy of 24 days. This represents an increase of 6 days over the healthy WT C. elegans. Furthermore, we observed very low mortality during the first 15 days for C. elegans exposed to 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml MoSe2. These results demonstrate that MoSe2 drastically extends the lifespan of C. elegans and strongly reduces nematode death during the first half of their life.
Neurological conditions are the second leading cause of death and are the leading cause of disability worldwide (33). Proper mitochondrial function is vital for cellular homeostasis. In a dysfunctional state, mitochondria cause deleterious effects on the cell—including oxidative stress, secondary excitotoxicity, and insufficient production of ATP—which in turn can trigger apoptosis (34). No current treatment provides neuroprotective properties, leaving a large unmet need for a therapeutic targeting the mitochondria.
To meet this need, two structurally different NFs were synthesized. Cell biogenesis assay revealed that MoSe2 caused stronger biogenesis in neurons than MoS2. A strong decrease in the magnitude of mitochondrial impairment and ROS levels was observed in all cells exposed to MoS2 and MoSe2 NFs. The increase in mitochondrial biogenesis and C. elegans lifespan hint at TMD NFs’ neuroprotective potential. The magnitude of beneficial effects varies between NFs, and this observation further demonstrates that neuroprotective effects of TMD NFs are determined by their structure. Consequently, it becomes critically important to examine which characteristics of TMD NFs are the key player in biological and neuroprotective activity, with further research elucidating how size, morphology, and chemical composition affect how neuronal cells behave upon exposure. We hypothesize the size and surface area-to-volume ratio are the main driving characteristics to the tested TMD NFs’ neuroprotective potential. By manipulating key aspects of synthesis protocols, the neuroprotective activity of larger and smaller size NFs, TMD nanorods, and other dichalcogenides, including tungsten disulfide and tungsten diselenide, as well as TMD NF oxides remains of interest in planned future studies.
Experimental procedures
Materials
All chemicals received were utilized without further purification. MilliQ water was utilized in the synthesis of nanomaterials. Ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate ((NH4)6Mo7O24) 4H2O), thiourea 99% (NH2CSNH2), selenium powder, and sodium borohydride (NaBH4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich).
Synthesis of NFs
MoS2 NFs were synthesized using a hydrothermal synthesis reaction. For this, 50 ml solution of 0.01 mol (NH4)6Mo7O24 and 0.06 mol NH2CSNH2 in MilliQ water was kept for 30 min at room temperature prior to its transfer into 50-ml teflon-lined autoclave reactors. The autoclaves were exposed to 200 °C for 24 h. After autoclave reactors were allowed to cool to room temperature overnight, the resulting black precipitate was collected and centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 5 min. The samples were washed with MilliQ water and centrifuged twice at 7000 rpm for 5 min. Next, samples were washed with ethanol, placed on a glass Petri dish, and kept overnight in a dry hot air oven at 60 °C. The desiccated NFs were collected from the Petri dish and stored.
MoSe2 NFs were synthesized using a hydrothermal synthesis reaction. (NH4)6Mo7O24 (0.003 mol) and NaBH4 (0.1 g) were dissolved in 50 ml solution of MilliQ water and pure ethanol at a 1:1 ratio. Separately, 0.006 mol of selenium powder was dissolved in 10 ml of NaBH4, added to the solution of (NH4)6Mo7O24, and stirred for 30 min at room temperature. The obtained solution was transferred into two 50-ml teflon-lined autoclave reactors and placed at 200 °C for 48 h. After the heating was turned off, the reactor was allowed to cool to room temperature. The resulting black precipitate was collected and centrifuged at 7, 000 rpm for 5 min, washed with MilliQ water and centrifuged three times. The washed nanoparticles were placed on a glass Petri dish and allowed to dry in a hot air oven at 60 °C overnight. The desiccated NFs were collected and stored.
Scanning electron microscopy
MoS2 and MoSe2 NFs were imaged with a scanning electron microscope at the Material Characterization Facility at Texas A&M University [RRID: SCR_022202].
Cell culture
Dopaminergic midbrain N27 rat neurons were purchased from American Type Culture Collection and grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen).
CTX TNA2 and DI TNC1 rat astrocyte cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen).
All cells were cultured in T-75 flasks purchased from (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 environment until utilized in experiments. Cells were passaged at approximately 90% confluency. All cell types were used prior to the 10th passage to ensure reliable results.
NF treatments
Cells were seeded based on the quantity necessary for the assay being performed (10,000–100,000 cells per well). The cells were allowed to fully adhere overnight. After adhering, 10% of the media was removed. A 2 mg/ml stock of the NF was made in PBS. The 2 mg/ml stock was probe sonicated for 30 s to suspend the NFs completely. The 2 mg/ml stock was then serially diluted into the three tested concentrations: 1.0 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, and 0.1 mg/ml. The same volume of removed media was then replaced by an equivalent volume of the tested concentration of NFs. The control cells that did not receive any NFs got an equivalent volume of PBS. The final volume of NFs for each sample is 10% solution consistent across all cell types and prepared concentrations of NFs.
Raman spectroscopy
Confirmation of cellular uptake of NFs was conducted using Raman spectroscopy. The Raman spectra were collected using a TE-2000U Nikon inverted confocal microscope equipped with a solid-state laser generated continuous wavelength 532 nm light. Electromagnetic radiation was directed toward the sample directed using a 50/50 beam splitter and focused by 20× Nikon objective. Scattered light was collected using the same objective and directed into an IsoPlane-320 spectrometer (Princeton Instruments) equipped with a 1200 groove/nm grating. Prior to entering the spectrograph, elastically scattered photons were removed using a long-pass filter (Semrock). The inelastically scattered photons were collected using PIX-400B CCD (Princeton Instruments).
For the measurements, 10,000 cells were seeded in glass-bottom 96-well plate and allowed to adhere overnight. NF treatments were administered as previously described, and cells were incubated for 24 h. After incubation, the 96-well plate was mounted on the confocal Raman spectroscope. Individual cells were selected and placed in the focal plane of the laser. The Raman spectra were collected using 10 s acquisition time and 6.85 mW of light. In parallel, reference Raman spectra were collected from dry NFs.
Proliferation assay
Growth assays for each cell type with each NF were conducted. Cells were placed in a 24-well plate and allowed to adhere for 24 h. Cells then either received a 10% concentration of PBS as a negative control or a 10% concentration treatment of 0.5 mg/ml of MoS2 or MoSe2. Cells were counted after 24, 48, and 72 h with an Invitrogen Countess 3 Automated Cell Counter (Thermo Fisher Scientific) after NF treatment and compared.
A proliferation assay was also conducted using alamarBlue HS Cell Viability Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After allowing 20,000 cells to adhere to the plate overnight, each well was treated with either PBS or the specified NF at each concentration. After 2 h, the alamarBlue reagent was added to the wells. The color change was observed, and the fluorescence was measured after 6 h.
Mitochondrial health assays
Cells were plated in 96-well plates and treated with NFs according to parameters previously detailed. To assess the levels of ROS present in the cells, the wells were treated with CellROX Deep Red Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The treated cells were scanned and measured using an LSRII BD flow cytometer (BD). The data were analyzed, and cell toxicity was calculated using LSRII software. To assess the health of mitochondria in the NF-treated cells, the wells were treated with MitoProbe JC-1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The treated cells were scanned and measured using an LSRII BD flow cytometer (BD). The data were analyzed, and cell toxicity was calculated using LSRII software.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Mitochondrial biogenesis was quantified using the MitoBiogenesis In-Cell ELISA Colorimetric Kit (Abcam). Cells were treated according to the NF parameters previously stated. After 24 h of treatment, the cells were fixed to the plate using BD Cytofix fixation buffer (BD Biosciences). The cells were then blocked, permeabilized, and treated with primary and secondary antibodies. The cells were then treated with AP development solution and absorbance was measured using a plate reader to quantify expression of SDH-A. The media was removed, and the cells were treated with horseradish peroxidase development solution and absorbance was measured using a plate reader to quantify expression of COX-1. Data were saved, collected, and analyzed for reporting.
Polymerase chain reaction
PCR for genes with roles in the mitochondrial biogenesis pathway was conducted, as well as mitochondria copy number, using GAPDH as a housekeeping gene. All primers were designed using the known rat gene sequences in the NCBI database and created using the Integrated DNA Technologies custom oligonucleotide PCR primer generation software. All primers were ordered and received from Integrated DNA Technologies. Cells were treated according to treatments described above. The cells were harvested and centrifuged to form a pellet. The pellet was resuspended in TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and chloroform (Avantor). The solution was centrifuged, and RNA was extracted from the aqueous phase. The RNA was then converted to complimentary DNA to be used in the PCR reaction. The utilized primers are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
qPCR Primers
| Gene | Sense primer | Antisense primer |
|---|---|---|
| SIRT3 | 5′ GCTCATGGGTCCTTTGTATCA 3′ | 5′ CCTAGCTGGACCACATCTTC 3′ |
| ERRα | 5′ TGGCCGACAGAAGTACAA 3′ | 5′ AGAGTGACAGTGAGGAGAAG 3′ |
| ERRß | 5′ CCTTTGTCCATCCCTTTCTC 3′ | 5′ CCTGTGTGTGTCTCTTTGTG 3′ |
| NRF2 | 5′ CGAAGGAGAGGGAAGAATAAAG 3′ | 5′AGTACTCACTGGGAGAGTAAGG 3′ |
| PPARα | 5′ TTGTGCATGGCTGAGAAG 3′ | 5′ CAGCATCCCGTCTTTGTT 3′ |
| PPARγ | 5′ GGCCTCCCTGATGAATAAAG 3′ | 5′ CGGTCTCCACTGAGAATAATG 3′ |
| PPARδ | 5′ CATTGCCGCCATCATTCT 3′ | 5′ GTCTCACTCTCCGTCTTCTT 3′ |
| GCN5 | 5′ GGAGAATGTGTCAGAGGATGAG 3′ | 5′ CTCCAGCTTCCAGTAGTTAAGG 3′ |
| SRC3 | 5′ GCAGGAGAGCAAGTACATAGAG 3′ | 5′ CGGTTCACCACAAACAGAAAG 3′ |
| GAPDH | 5′ GGCACAGTCAAGGCTGAGAATG 3′ | 5′ ATGGTGGTGAAGACGCCAGTA 3′ |
ERR, estrogen-related receptor; NRF2, nuclear respiratory factor 2; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; qPCR, quantitative PCR; SIRT3, sirtuin 3; SRC-3, steroid receptor coactivator-3.
C. elegans in vivo modeling
WT N2 C. elegans strain was acquired as a kind gift from Dr Michael Polymenis, Texas A&M University. The C. elegans were raised on NGM plates seeded with OP50 Escherichia coli and maintained at a constant 20 °C until reaching an egg-producing age. Age synchronization was conducted by collecting all worms and eggs and bleaching the solution to remove all adult worms, according to Sutphin & Kaeberlein’s protocol (35). Synchronized worms were allowed to reach “day 1 adult” age before being transferred onto experimental plates. Ten individual worms were moved onto each conditioned agar plate. The conditioned plates were produced by plating E. coli supplemented with TMD NFs. NF supplementation was performed by mixing concentrated 2% stocks with 10× concentrated OP50 E. coli at a 1:1 ratio before plating, quickly drying, and UV irradiating. Survival of the C. elegans was determined by counting the number of alive and dead organisms on each plate until no surviving worms were counted and then calculated using the Kaplan–Meier equation.
Fluorescent imaging
Fluorescent imaging was conducted in an EVOS M5000 microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). To image the cellular skeleton, CellMask Green Actin Tracking Stain and CellMask Deep Red Actin Tracking stains were utilized. To locate and image mitochondria, MitoTracker Orange CM-H2TMRos were used. The nuclei were stained using NucBlue Live Cell Stain ReadyProbe reagent. To enable visualization of ROS levels and the extent of mitochondrial impairment, CellROX Deep Red reagent and MitoProbe JC-1 reagent were used, respectively. All fluorescent stains and reagents were acquired from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
To image NFs in the cells, N27 neurons, DI astrocytes, and CTX astrocytes were captured when incubated without NFs, as well as with 0.5 mg/ml MoS2, and with 0.5 mg/ml MoSe2 using green channel.
Conclusions
The reported results indicate that TMD NFs facilitate mitochondrial biogenesis which results in the reduction of ROS-induced mitochondrial damage in neurons and astrocytes. These effects are exerted by the upregulation of the PGC-1α pathway. Thus, MoS2 and MoSe2 NFs hold a powerful potential to be neuroprotective therapeutics in neurological conditions with mitochondrial dysfunction.
Data availability
Data will be available upon the reasonable request from the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the National Institute of Health for the provided financial support (R35GM142869).
Author contributions
M. M., D. K., and C. L. M. writing–review and editing; M. M., D. K., C. L. M. writing–original draft; M. M. and C. L. M. methodology; D. K. project administration; D. K. funding acquisition; C. L. M. visualization; C. L. M. validation; D. K. and C. L. M. conceptualization; M. M. and D. K. supervision; C. L. M. formal analysis; C. L. M. investigation; C. L. M. data curation.
Funding and additional information
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Reviewed by members of the JBC Editorial Board. Edited by Elizabeth J. Coulson
References
- 1.Dumurgier J., Tzourio C. Epidemiology of neurological diseases in older adults. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 2020;176:642–648. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.01.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Farooqui T., Farooqui A.A. Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier; London, United Kingdom; San Diego, CA: 2019. Curcumin for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders: Neurochemical and Pharmacological Properties. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sokoloff L. Metabolism of ketone bodies by the brain. Annu. Rev. Med. 1973;24:271–280. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.24.020173.001415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang L., Yang Z., He X., Pu S., Yang C., Wu Q., et al. Mitochondrial protein dysfunction in pathogenesis of neurological diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2022;15 doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.974480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guo X., Yang N., Ji W., Zhang H., Dong X., Zhou Z., et al. Mito-bomb: targeting mitochondria for cancer therapy. Adv. Mater. 2021;33 doi: 10.1002/adma.202007778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Murphy M.P., Hartley R.C. Mitochondria as a therapeutic target for common pathologies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018;17:865–886. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Abrishamdar M., Jalali M.S., Farbood Y. Targeting mitochondria as a therapeutic approach for Parkinson's disease. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2023;43:1499–1518. doi: 10.1007/s10571-022-01265-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Joshi A., Gohil V.M. Cardiolipin deficiency leads to the destabilization of mitochondrial magnesium channel MRS2 in Barth syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2023;32:3353–3360. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddad153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ahmed S.T., Craven L., Russell O.M., Turnbull D.M., Vincent A.E. Diagnosis and treatment of mitochondrial myopathies. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15:943–953. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-00674-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhong G., Venkatesan J.K., Madry H., Cucchiarini M. Advances in human mitochondria-based therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;24:608. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wenz T. Mitochondria and PGC-1alpha in aging and age-associated diseases. J. Aging Res. 2011;2011 doi: 10.4061/2011/810619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fontecha-Barriuso M., Martin-Sanchez D., Martinez-Moreno J.M., Monsalve M., Ramos A.M., Sanchez-Nino M.D., et al. The role of PGC-1alpha and mitochondrial biogenesis in Kidney diseases. Biomolecules. 2020;10:347. doi: 10.3390/biom10020347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Halling J.F., Pilegaard H. PGC-1alpha-mediated regulation of mitochondrial function and physiological implications. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2020;45:927–936. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nguyen T.T., Oh S.S., Weaver D., Lewandowska A., Maxfield D., Schuler M.H., et al. Loss of Miro1-directed mitochondrial movement results in a novel murine model for neuron disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111:E3631–E3640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402449111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alshaabi H., Shannon N., Gravelle R., Milczarek S., Messier T., Cunniff B. Miro1-mediated mitochondrial positioning supports subcellular redox status. Redox Biol. 2021;38 doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bartok A., Weaver D., Golenar T., Nichtova Z., Katona M., Bansaghi S., et al. IP(3) receptor isoforms differently regulate ER-mitochondrial contacts and local calcium transfer. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3726. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11646-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Katona M., Bartok A., Nichtova Z., Csordas G., Berezhnaya E., Weaver D., et al. Capture at the ER-mitochondrial contacts licenses IP(3) receptors to stimulate local Ca(2+) transfer and oxidative metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:6779. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34365-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mitchell C.L., Kurouski D. Novel strategies in Parkinson's disease treatment: a review. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2024;17 doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1431079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ganesha H., Veeresh S., Nagaraju Y.S., Vandana M., Basappa M., Vijeth H., et al. 2-Dimensional layered molybdenum disulfide nanosheets and CTAB-assisted molybdenum disulfide nanoflower for high performance supercapacitor application. Nanoscale Adv. 2022;4:521–531. doi: 10.1039/d1na00664a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shi J., Li J., Wang Y., Cheng J., Zhang C.Y. Recent advances in MoS(2)-based photothermal therapy for cancer and infectious disease treatment. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2020;8:5793–5807. doi: 10.1039/d0tb01018a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Qi X., Li L., Ye P., Xie M. Macrophage membrane-modified MoS(2) quantum dots as a nanodrug for combined multi-targeting of Alzheimer's disease. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024;13 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202303211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Luo R., Xu W.W., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Wang X., Gao Y., et al. Van der Waals interfacial reconstruction in monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides and gold heterojunctions. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1011. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14753-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singh K.A., Soukar J., Zulkifli M., Kersey A., Lokhande G., Ghosh S., et al. Atomic vacancies of molybdenum disulfide nanoparticles stimulate mitochondrial biogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:8136. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52276-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shrestha A., Bruckmueller H., Kildalsen H., Kaur G., Gaestel M., Wetting H.L., et al. Phosphorylation of steroid receptor coactivator-3 (SRC-3) at serine 857 is regulated by the p38(MAPK)-MK2 axis and affects NF-kappaB-mediated transcription. Sci. Rep. 2020;10 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68219-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Haque M.E., Jakaria M., Akther M., Cho D.Y., Kim I.S., Choi D.K. The GCN5: its biological functions and therapeutic potentials. Clin. Sci. (Lond) 2021;135:231–257. doi: 10.1042/CS20200986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bhatti J.S., Kumar S., Vijayan M., Bhatti G.K., Reddy P.H. Therapeutic strategies for mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in age-related metabolic disorders. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017;146:13–46. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Scarpulla R.C., Vega R.B., Kelly D.P. Transcriptional integration of mitochondrial biogenesis. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;23:459–466. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang S., Li F., Zhou T., Wang G., Li Z. Caenorhabditis elegans as a useful model for studying aging mutations. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.554994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ruszkiewicz J.A., Pinkas A., Miah M.R., Weitz R.L., Lawes M.J.A., Akinyemi A.J., et al. C. elegans as a model in developmental neurotoxicology. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2018;354:126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hunt P.R. The C. elegans model in toxicity testing. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2017;37:50–59. doi: 10.1002/jat.3357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Christensen R.P., Bokinsky A., Santella A., Wu Y., Marquina-Solis J., Guo M., et al. Untwisting the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Elife. 2015;4:e10070. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Caldwell K.A., Willicott C.W., Caldwell G.A. Modeling neurodegeneration in caenorhabditiselegans. Dis. Model Mech. 2020;13:dmm046110. doi: 10.1242/dmm.046110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Carroll W.M. The global burden of neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:418–419. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Millichap L.E., Damiani E., Tiano L., Hargreaves I.P. Targetable pathways for alleviating mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegeneration of metabolic and non-metabolic diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:11444. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sutphin G.L., Kaeberlein M. Measuring Caenorhabditis elegans life span on solid media. J. Vis. Exp. 2009 doi: 10.3791/1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be available upon the reasonable request from the authors.






