Table 4.
Comparison of the adsorption capacity of the developed Ce-BTC@MCC composite for CR with other reported adsorbents.
| Adsorbent | qmax (mg/g) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| ZT-MOF@Ag@C | 416.6 | 101 |
| AlOOH/CoFe2O4 | 565.0 | 102 |
| Fe3O4@bacteria | 320.1 | 103 |
| UiO-66-NH2@PEI | 583.4 | 104 |
| ZIF-8-PVA | 829.4 | 105 |
| ZIF-8@PDA | 525.8 | 106 |
| ATTM@ZIF-8 | 680.3 | 107 |
| NH2-MIL-101(Fe) | 248.4 | 108 |
| Cu-MOF | 119.8 | 109 |
| CA-β-CD-MOF | 900.9 | 110 |
| IL@HBU-167 | 544.6 | 111 |
| Fe3O4@TpPDA | 179.4 | 112 |
| Ni/Co-BTC hollow MOFs | 168.1 | 113 |
| Fe/MOF-5@CTS | 219.8 | 114 |
| Quasi-HKUST | 715.0 | 115 |
| Ce-BTC@MCC | 926.3 | This work |