Skip to main content
. 2025 May 21;14(6):e250008. doi: 10.57264/cer-2025-0008

Table 5. . Threshold analysis of the list price for rivaroxaban with and without generic pricing assumption: cost–effectiveness analysis results comparing apixaban switchers (to rivaroxaban) versus apixaban continuers.

Discount to rivaroxaban list price Generic pricing enabled Generic pricing excluded
Incremental cost Incremental QALYs Cost per QALY Incremental cost Incremental QALYs Cost per QALY
0% €4967.76 -0.079 Dominated €8577.10 -0.079 Dominated
10% €4863.54 Dominated €7534.90 Dominated
20% €4759.32 Dominated €6492.69 Dominated
30% €4655.10 Dominated €5450.48 Dominated
40% €4550.87 Dominated €4408.27 Dominated
50% €4446.65 Dominated €3366.06 Dominated
60% €4342.43 Dominated €2323.85 Dominated
70% €4238.21 Dominated €1281.64 Dominated
80% €4133.99 Dominated €239.43 Dominated
90% €4029.77 Dominated -€802.78 €10,152.08 (not cost-effective)
100% €3925.55 Dominated -€1844.99 €23,332.05 (not cost-effective)

For the purpose of this threshold analysis, incremental discounts were applied to the rivaroxaban list price prior to loss of exclusivity, meaning any further discounts due to generic pricing were applied to this discounted list price.

QALY: Quality-adjusted life year.