Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Feb 28;66(4):189–198. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14447

From Monotherapy to Adjunctive Therapies: Application of Dermocosmetics in Acne Management Across Australia and New Zealand

Ryan De Cruz 1,2,, Rebecca Nguyen 3, Peggy Chen 4, Delphine Kerob 5, Kurt Gebauer 6,7, Anneliese Willems 8, Philip Tong 9,10, Michael Lee 11
PMCID: PMC12145734  PMID: 40019045

ABSTRACT

Acne vulgaris is a globally prevalent dermatological disease, with its severity ranging from mild to severe. While moderate to severe acne often requires topical or systemic pharmaceutical therapy, mild to moderate acne may be managed with dermocosmetics, which are over‐the‐counter skincare agents with active ingredients that target acne pathophysiology. Dermocosmetics can also be effective as adjunct therapy for the management of more severe acne. For example, they can be used to complement the mode of action of pharmaceuticals or to mitigate side effects and improve treatment compliance. This review discusses the roles of commonly available dermocosmetics in the context of both mild and severe acne management protocols.

Keywords: acne management, acne vulgaris, Australia, dermocosmetics, New Zealand

1. Introduction

Acne vulgaris is recognised as one of the most common inflammatory skin conditions globally [1] and is the eighth most prevalent disease worldwide, affecting 9.4% of people [2]. Acne is most common in teenagers, universally affecting 85% of adolescents [3]; however, adult acne is on the rise with a 10% increase in women over the past 10 years [3]. Acne can have a profound impact on the psychosocial wellbeing and quality of life of individuals, potentially contributing to depression. Furthermore, acne can potentially lead to permanent scarring [1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].

Acne has a complex pathophysiology, with four main factors: (i) hyperkeratinisation of the pilosebaceous infundibulum; (ii) inflammation; (iii) Cutibacterium acnes dysbiosis [11, 12]; and (iv) aberrant sebaceous gland function [13]. Recent evidence suggests that acne is caused by defective differentiation of the LRIG1‐expressing stem cells (residing in the hair follicle junction zone) into microcomedones instead of normally functioning sebaceous glands [14]. This aberrant stem cell differentiation may be caused by abnormal Wnt signalling [15]. The Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) phylotype present on the skin can also impact acne development; different C. acnes phylotypes have been shown to secrete extracellular vesicles containing proteins that differentially alter the communication between the skin microbiota and the host [16, 17].

While the selection of acne treatment is often based on the severity and duration of acne, skin type, psychosocial factors and lifestyle [18], most clinical guidelines focus solely on the use of prescription medicines [19]. Adherence to acne prescription medicines is poor, with an estimated global adherence rate of 50% [20]. Poor compliance is independently correlated with various factors, including the occurrence of side effects [20]. Factors that may positively impact treatment adherence include the use of dermocosmetics (also known as cosmeceuticals) such as cleansers and moisturisers [20]. Increasingly, dermocosmetics are being adopted for the management of acne to improve both treatment adherence and outcomes and to minimise possible side effects from pharmacotherapy [21, 22].

Dermocosmetics can be applied either as a monotherapy for milder forms of acne, or as an adjunct to prescription medications in more severe forms [22, 23]. Once acne is under control, dermocosmetics may continue to play a role in maintenance therapy and the prevention of new breakouts. Dermocosmetics are becoming increasingly popular as an alternate management strategy for patients with chronic acne, during periods of relapse, and in ameliorating side effects of other acne medications [24]. There is an increase in the number of published clinical studies on the use of dermocosmetics in the management of acne; however, these studies often have a small sample size and/or less rigorous study design and hence do not have the same strength of evidence as pharmaceutical studies.

Dermocosmetics contain active ingredients that have a measurable biological action on the skin [23, 25]. The active ingredients target different aspects of acne pathophysiology, including aberrant keratinisation, inflammation, sebum production and microbiome imbalance. Such ingredients may also help manage acne by protecting and improving epidermal barrier function.

The aim of this review is to discuss the use of dermocosmetics in acne management, both as monotherapy for mild acne or as adjunctive treatment to prescription therapy in the Australian and New Zealand landscape.

2. Dermocosmetics as Monotherapy

Acne severity is commonly categorised into four levels of severity: mild, moderate, severe and very severe. There are several acne severity assessment scales available. The Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) is a simple and internationally recognised grading system that divides the face, chest and back into six areas, and the severity in each zone is then assessed on a scale of 0 to 4 (0, no lesions; 1, comedones; 2, papules; 3, pustules; and 4, nodules). A total score for all six zones is then calculated, and the acne severity is classified as either mild [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18], moderate [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30], severe [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38], or very severe (> 39) [26].

The use of dermocosmetics as monotherapy is appropriate for mild acne (especially prior to Dermatologist input); as maintenance therapy following treatment with pharmaceutical drugs; or during pregnancy and lactation when prescription acne treatments are contraindicated [27, 28]. Moderate and severe acne usually require treatment with pharmaceutical drugs; however, dermocosmetics can be useful adjunctive treatments to these prescription medicines to either complement a drug's mode of action and efficacy or to improve treatment tolerance and therefore treatment adherence and optimise results.

Mild acne can be managed by dermocosmetics (Table 1) as they have been shown to reduce acne lesions and improve global assessment scores [11, 24, 29]. Dermocosmetics can also aid in maintaining acne clearance after discontinuation of pharmaceutical treatment [11, 30]. Active ingredients aiming at improving milder forms of acne target the key pathogenic pathways shown in Figure 1.

TABLE 1.

Recommendations for the use of dermocosmetics as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy for the management of acne.

Type of dermocosmetics use Recommendation
Monotherapy Dermocosmetics including multitargeting ingredients (keratolytics + anti‐inflammatory, and/or anti sebum production, and/or microbiome targeting ingredients) can be recommended as monotherapy for:
  • Earlier forms of acne to aid the decrease of acne lesions, improve global acne, reduce skin oiliness, improve PIHP while having a good tolerance

  • Maintenance following prior acne treatments

Adjunctive therapy
Dermocosmetics including multitargeting ingredients (keratolytics + anti‐inflammatory, and/or anti sebum production, and/or microbiome targeting ingredients) may be recommended as adjunctive therapy:
  • to augment prescription medical acne treatment mode of action
  • to improve tolerability of acne treatments
Dermocosmetics with ingredients targeting skin barrier, skin microbiome and inflammation and sebum production might be recommended in acne as adjunct to acne topical and/or systemic treatments with a view to:
  • improve tolerability of prescription acne treatments, especially retinoid‐based products (topical or systemic)
  • reduce irritation and/or adverse events from washes, cleansers, etc.
  • reduce skin oiliness
  • improve barrier function (corneometer and TEWL scores)
  • further improve patient adherence, satisfaction and quality of life

Abbreviations: PIH, post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation; TEWL, transepidermal water loss.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Common acne active ingredients used in dermocosmetics.

3. Anti‐Inflammatory Agents

3.1. Niacinamide

Niacinamide (also known as nicotinamide, 3‐pyridinecarboxamide) is the physiologically active form of vitamin B3 [31]. It has a range of dermatological therapeutic effects, including anti‐inflammatory and anti‐bacterial properties. Its mechanisms of action remain unclear; however, it is postulated to have a broad range of activities, given that it is a key precursor of the coenzymes NADH and NADPH [31].

Topical niacinamide 4% has been shown to reduce inflammatory papules (−60%) and acne lesions (−52%) [32]. Three double‐blind RCTs comparing topical niacinamide and the topical antibiotic clindamycin showed that 4%–5% niacinamide has comparable efficacy on acne lesions and acne severity as 1%–2% clindamycin [32, 33, 34]. As such, niacinamide is used not only for its efficacy, but it also does not contribute to anti‐microbial resistance.

Topical niacinamide can also reduce sebum production [35]. In an in vitro study where viable human facial biopsies (from facelift surgery) were treated with niacinamide, there was a significant dose‐dependent reduction in total sebaceous lipid components (namely triglycerides and fatty acids) [31, 36]. However, there might be differences in the effect of niacinamide based on skin type. Two separate double‐blind placebo‐controlled studies examining the use of 2% niacinamide for 6 weeks were conducted on Japanese participants and on Caucasian participants. Niacinamide was shown to significantly lower the sebum excretion rate in the study with Japanese participants, but not in the study with Caucasian participants. Conversely, niacinamide reduced sebum levels in Caucasian participants, but not in their Japanese counterparts [35].

Topical niacinamide has also been shown to improve overall skin appearance in Caucasian women by reducing erythema, wrinkles, yellowing and hyperpigmentation [37].

3.2. Zinc Salts

Zinc has been shown to act as an anti‐inflammatory on acne lesions through its inhibition of leucocyte chemotaxis [38]. Clinical studies have demonstrated a benefit of both topical and systemic zinc in acne treatment. A systematic review and meta‐analysis examining the efficacy of both topical and oral zinc in acne treatment found that patients treated with either oral or topical zinc (either as monotherapy or as an adjunctive treatment) had a significant improvement in mean inflammatory papule count compared to those not treated with zinc [39]. Oral zinc at doses of 50 mg elemental zinc up to TDS was found to be effective in early studies [40].

Topical Zinc has also been shown to benefit mild to moderate acne. A single‐blind trial of 47 patients showed a benefit in reducing the number of inflammatory lesions [41]. Moreover, a single‐blind, randomised study of 73 patients showed the topical combination treatment erythromycin (4%) plus zinc acetate (1.2%) showed a benefit in reducing the number of inflammatory lesions [42].

3.3. “Probiotic” Preparations

Probiotic lysates or fractions (which have pre‐biotic action or some similar probiotic activity to live bacteria) have been shown to have beneficial effects on the skin [43]. Although evidence is weak and mostly derived from in vitro studies, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus have shown potential to control acne [44]. A randomised double‐blind split‐face RCT of 34 patients compared the topical application of Lactobacillus‐fermented Chamaecyparis obtusa (LFCO) to tea tree oil; LFCO led to a greater reduction in inflammatory lesions (−65.3%) than tea tree oil (38%), and reduced sebum excretion and sebaceous gland size [45]. Lactobacillus fermentation of the Chamaecyparis obtusa plant is thought to induce biochemical conversions of metabolites with enhanced antimicrobial or antioxidant activities [46]. Furthermore, a 5% extract of Lactobacillus plantarum has been reported to exhibit anti‐acne effects, reducing skin erythema and acne lesions [47].

4. Keratolytic Agents

Hyperkeratinisation occurs when follicles become occluded, preventing normal skin cell shedding and inducing microcomedones with the potential for progression to acneiform lesions. Comedonal acne usually responds to topical keratolytic agents, and there are a number of keratolytic agents used in dermocosmetics [48].

4.1. Salicylic Acid

Salicylic acid, a lipid‐soluble beta‐hydroxy acid, is used as a topical treatment for acne both as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy [24]. It is thought to dissolve intercellular lipids and reduce comedones, thus ameliorating abnormal keratinisation and reducing inflammation [24]. There are only a small number of studies examining the effect of salicylic acid on acne [49, 50, 51]. A study of 30 acne patients showed that treatment with a 2% salicylic acid cleanser for 2 weeks significantly reduces comedones [51]. A study of 60 people with moderate to severe acne showed that the addition of 20% topical salicylic acid to oral isotretinoin treatment significantly improves the clearance of acne than monotherapy with isotretinoin [50]. Furthermore, a study of 20 comedonal acne patients showed that fortnightly peels with salicylic acid significantly reduced noninflammatory lesions [49]. Current Australian Therapeutic Guidelines for acne recommend the use of over‐the‐counter topical salicylic acid for mild acne [52].

4.2. Lipohydroxy Acid

Lipohydroxy acid (LHA) is a lipophilic derivative of salicylic acid that exhibits slower penetration and better tolerability [53]. Like salicylic acid, LHA has comedolytic properties due to its exfoliating effects [53]. In a small study of 28 acne‐prone women, LHA decreased the number and total size of microcomedones. This effect was not seen in untreated controls [54]. A study of 80 patients with mild or moderate acne demonstrated that LHA was equally as effective as 5% benzoyl peroxide at decreasing inflammatory and non‐inflammatory lesions and is a suitable alternative for patients who are intolerant to benzoyl peroxide or for patients who wish to avoid the unwanted bleaching effect of benzoyl peroxide [55]. Furthermore, a split‐face study of 20 people with comedonal acne showed that LHA is as effective at decreasing non‐inflammatory lesions as salicylic acid [49]. Current Australian Therapeutic Guidelines for acne recommend the use of over‐the‐counter topical LHA for mild acne [52].

4.3. Alpha Hydroxy Acids (AHAs)

AHAs such as lactic acid and glycolic acid are used in acne management as they limit follicular blockage, promote skin peeling and reduce abnormal keratinisation [24, 56]. Low concentration AHAs have a moisturising effect, while high concentrations have keratolytic and exfoliating actions [56]. AHA‐containing formulations have been shown to improve acne, and AHAs can be used as a topical treatment for acne both as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy [24]. Glycolic acid peels, either alone [57] or in combination with retinoic acid [58, 59, 60], have been shown to reduce acne lesions [61, 62].

4.4. Retinaldehyde

Topical retinoids (such as adapalene, isotretinoin and tretinoin) are widely used prescription medicines for acne therapy as they target multiple pathogenic mechanisms. They are anti‐inflammatory and increase epithelial turnover, thus providing a comedolytic action [6]. There is strong evidence for their use in acne treatment, with several randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies demonstrating their efficacy [63, 64, 65]. Adapalene, isotretinoin and tretinoin are schedule 4 therapies (requiring prescription) and are associated with side effects including erythema, irritation, dryness and peeling [6]. However, retinaldehyde, a direct retinoic acid precursor, has been shown to be effective in reducing comedones and microcysts when combined with erythromycin [66], and has been shown to be less irritating than other retinoids [60].

5. Antimicrobial Agents

Historically, C. acnes was thought to be the aetiological agent of acne, leading to high prescription rates of antibiotics. Although data remain limited, growing evidence is associating acne with a disequilibrium in the composition of the skin's microbiome [67]. For example, some C. acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains are thought to contribute to acne, while other strains are thought to promote healthy skin by inhibiting the invasion of pathogens [67]. As such, there is a need to manage C. acnes phylotypes, rather than eradicate them completely. This is of high importance as there has been a clear overuse of topical and/or systemic antibiotics leading to increased antibiotic resistance [68]. Indeed, antibiotic resistance has been associated with antibiotics used to treat acne, and an increase in C. acnes resistance to antibiotics is seen worldwide [69, 70]. Other antimicrobial agents, including bakuchiol, probiotics, tea tree oil and decanediol, are commonly found in dermocosmetics and aid in the reduction of acne‐causing microbes [24]. These agents may play a role in the reduction of antibiotic resistance since they may, in some cases, substitute for antibiotics in acne treatment.

5.1. Benzoyl Peroxide

Benzoyl peroxide shows a strong efficacy profile for mild acne treatment [6, 71]. It acts by reducing C. acnes colonisation. A study of 30 healthy subjects showed that daily use of a 6% benzoyl peroxide cleanser decreases C. acnes colonies, including erythromycin/tetracycline‐resistant strains [72]. Current Australian Therapeutic Guidelines for acne recommend the use of over‐the‐counter topical benzoyl peroxide for mild acne [52]. Similarly, European and United States guidelines also recommend benzoyl peroxide for the treatment of mild to moderate acne [6, 71]. For moderate to severe acne, benzoyl peroxide is primarily recommended in combination with topical or systemic antibiotics since it has been shown to be more effective in combination with adapalene or clindamycin; the strength of evidence to support its use with antibiotics is low to medium [6, 71]. However, benzoyl peroxide can have poor tolerance as it can cause significant irritation, contact dermatitis and bleaching of clothes and hair [56, 73].

5.2. Tea Tree Oil

Tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil is an extract from tea tree leaves. It exhibits broad‐spectrum anti‐microbial properties and has been shown to effectively treat mild acne [74]. In a placebo‐controlled randomised double‐blind trial performed in 60 patients with mild to moderate acne, topical 5% tea tree oil significantly reduced total acne lesions and acne severity [75]. Other comparative trials have shown that tea tree oil is better than placebo in reducing acne lesions and is equivalent to comparators including 5% benzoyl peroxide and 2% topical erythromycin [74]. Tea tree oil has been reported to cause allergic contact dermatitis in several studies [76]. As such, patch testing is recommended prior to use.

6. Sebum‐Reducing Agents

Sebum is comprised of wax, triglycerides, esters, squalene and cholesterol. Excess sebum is one pathogenic pathway in acne development [11]. A range of dermocosmetic agents is used to reduce excess sebum production.

6.1. Antioxidants

Oxidative stress has been shown to play a key role in acne progression [77]. Lipid peroxidation in sebum and the activation of immune cells in response to bacterial invasion potentially increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [78]. As such, antioxidants have been trialled in the management of acne. Antioxidant agents that have shown some therapeutic effect on acne include fullerene, epigallocatechin‐3‐Gallate, vitamin C and vitamin E [11].

6.2. Skin Barrier Protection

Skin barrier function is often compromised in acne‐affected skin [79]. Acne patients are more likely to exhibit increased facial skin pH, mirroring a chronic state of stratum corneum instability, which may contribute to acne lesions [79]. Moreover, some acne treatments such as benzoyl peroxide and retinoids can impact an intact skin barrier, leading to irritation and dryness [80]. These side effects can lead to a decrease in treatment adherence or even treatment cessation. Dermocosmetics are an important tool in reducing these side effects. Products such as moisturisers and non‐comedogenic cleansers can reduce skin irritation [81]. Agents thought to aid in skin barrier protection include procerad, glycerine, shea butter, niacinamide, ceramides, panthenol, mannose, Vitroscella filiformis/APF [23].

7. Dermocosmetics as Adjunctive Therapy

Dermocosmetic products are useful as adjunctive therapy to pharmacological treatments (Table 1). The combined use of different dermocosmetic compounds augments the effect of pharmaceuticals, presumably by targeting additional pathogenic factors and increasing compliance. For example, the use of glycolic acid in conjunction with tretinoin has been shown to improve treatment outcomes [24]. Moreover, a single‐centre, clinician‐blind, randomised study of 67 acne patients found that the clinical outcomes of 5% benzoyl peroxide treatment (reduction in comedones, lesions and papules) were enhanced by the additional use of a topical combination cream containing octyl salicylic acid, linoleic acid, nicotinamide and piroctone olamine [82]. Furthermore, the use of dermocosmetics containing compounds such as salicylic acid and niacinamide has been shown to reduce the need for benzoyl peroxide with no impact on the efficacy of mild to moderate acne [30].

Dermocosmetics can help mitigate side effects of pharmacological treatments and improve treatment tolerability and treatment adherence [30, 83, 84, 85]. Adherence to acne treatment is poor, with a mean global adherence rate of 50% [20]. This is thought to be in part due to skin irritation and side effects caused by some topical and systemic acne pharmaceuticals. Although there is limited supporting evidence, dermocosmetics are thought to help patients better tolerate topical prescription treatments, thus improving compliance and patient quality of life [81]. For example, a global survey of 3339 acne patients revealed that the use of moisturisers and cleansers in addition to anti‐acne dermocosmetics had a positive effect on treatment adherence [20]. Moreover, a single‐arm study of 40 patients receiving pharmacological acne treatment found that the daily use of a sun protection cream improved adherence to pharmacological therapy and improved acne symptoms [86].

Dermocosmetics can also play a role in maintenance therapy as they can help prevent acne relapse (Table 1). The use of dermocosmetics may reduce the need for pharmaceutical therapies in the treatment of mild to moderate acne. For example, a single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind RCT in 100 mild‐to‐moderate acne patients demonstrated that the concomitant use of a dermocosmetic containing salicylic acid, niacinamide and thermal spring water reduced the quantity of benzoyl peroxide needed to reach the same efficacy as benzoyl peroxide alone [30]. As such, appropriate dermocosmetics containing antimicrobial, anti‐inflammatory, antibiotic, or sebum‐controlling properties might be recommended to acne patients to complement their pharmacological regimen. Selection of the most suitable adjunctive dermocosmetics should be guided by prescribers to avoid the use of inappropriate products. Acne has been shown to worsen from inadequate product choice or products that cause irritation, photodermatitis, or xerosis [87].

8. Patient Education

Educating patients about which products to use can be challenging for healthcare professionals [23]. While many people with acne source information from their dermatologist (64.8%) or family doctor (7.5%), the internet and social media are the second most commonly used sources of acne information, with 39.3% of people stating they source information this way [88]. This leads to the propagation of myths and misconceptions around acne and its treatment and may, in turn, result in ineffective or inappropriate practices. Educational resources accessible to the public, particularly teenagers, are needed to address these commonly held misperceptions and improve care and personal practices [88, 89, 90, 91]. Common areas where there is misconception surrounding acne include the effect of sun exposure, diet, hygiene, the need for prescription medicines and the impact of acne on wellbeing.

8.1. Sun Exposure and Acne

Although the cause and management of acne are similar globally, the Australian/New Zealand region presents a unique treatment landscape due to higher levels of ultraviolet (UV) radiation and elevated cumulative sun damage caused by the outdoor lifestyle. Sun exposure and acne have been postulated to have a dichotomous relationship, whereby acne may be improved with some sun exposure but can also worsen [92]. UVA radiation, visible light and infrared light have been suggested to decrease C. acnes colonisation on the skin and therefore reduce inflammation [93]. However, there is no evidence to show that sunlight has a beneficial effect on acne [94, 95] and UV exposure is not considered an acne treatment [96]. UVB radiation may exacerbate acne development as it increases the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL‐8 and IL‐1β, leading to keratinocyte proliferation and sebum production [97]. Sunlight may also aggravate post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) or post‐inflammatory erythema following active acne [92]. Dermocosmetics may protect the skin against UV exposure, reducing the development of PIH [23]. Sun exposure without a broad‐spectrum UVB and high UVA protection SPF 30+ sunscreen should be avoided. Moreover, several medications used to treat acne result in photosensitivity and therefore require minimisation of sun exposure combined with consistent use of sunscreen [6].

8.2. Hygiene and Acne

There is no evidence to support the misconception that acne is caused by poor facial hygiene [95, 98]. On the contrary, excessive face washing or scrubbing will affect the epidermal barrier and exacerbate acne [5, 95], and further complicate the use of prescription therapies such as retinoids. Optimal facial skin cleansing usually depends on the individual's skin conditions and the presence of comedonal lesions. Patients should be educated on the importance of maintaining appropriate skin hygiene habits, especially following cessation of active acne treatment plans to prevent recurrence. Appropriate facial skin cleaning can prevent excess sebum accumulation, one of the primary causes of acne.

Evidence suggests that facial cleansing should be performed twice a day to help reduce erythema, papules and total inflammatory lesions [99]. Cleansers have also shown benefit in removing mild to moderate truncal acne [100] and facial acne [101]. Acne cleansers remove sebum and remove hair follicle plugs that obstruct the hair follicle [56]. To avoid skin irritation, acne cleansers should be soap‐free and pH‐balanced or acidic cleansers containing foaming and emulsifying surfactants are suitable for acne‐prone skin [56].

8.3. Acne and Prescription Medicines

Management of moderate and severe acne requires the use of prescription medications, including topical and/or systemic therapies, based on severity [102]. However, milder forms of acne may be effectively managed with dermocosmetics. Dermocosmetics are an important component of dermatologists' therapeutic armamentarium, including in the setting of adjunct to prescription medicines, either to complement the mode of action of the medicines or to mitigate their side effects.

9. Limitations

A limitation of this review is that the level of evidence for the use of all dermocosmetic products in the treatment of acne is limited, and evidence mainly consists of lower quality studies. However, the randomised controlled studies reviewed in this article demonstrate that dermocosmetics have a beneficial role in the management of acne, either as a monotherapy, as adjuncts to medication, or as maintenance therapy post‐acne medication. This highlights the need for further randomised controlled trials in this area to facilitate a greater level of evidence.

10. Conclusions

Dermocosmetics can add significant value in the effective management of acne and have the potential to be effective monotherapy in mild disease. Although the evidence base is limited, we believe that dermocosmetics can complement pharmaceutical‐grade therapies in moderate or severe acne, either by enhancing their efficacy or reducing their side effects and thereby increasing compliance. All clinicians, both in primary care and prescribing dermatologists, should be abreast of dermocosmetics as effective monotherapy in mild acne and as adjuncts to pharmacotherapy across all acne severities.

Conflicts of Interest

Ryan De Cruz: Advisory Boards for La Roche‐Posay, CeraVe, Novartis, Eli Lilly. Presentations for Eli‐Lilly, La Roche‐Posay, CeraVe, Novartis, MSD, Mayne Pharmaceuticals, iNova, AbbVie, Cutera, UCB. Rebecca Nguyen: Novartis, Janssen, BMS, UCB, Amgen. Kurt Gebauer: Advisory Board Member and Lecturer for Novartis, Leo, Janssen, Pfizer, BMS, Lilly, Abbvie. Michael Lee: Advisory board honoraria from La‐Roche Posay. Peggy Chen: Advisory Board fees from L'Oreal and travel/conference sponsorship from L'Oreal and Avene. Peggy Chen is an Editorial Board member of the Australasian Journal of Dermatology and a co‐author of this article. To minimise bias, she was excluded from all editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication. Delphine Kerob: Employee of La Roche‐Posay, a L'Oréal company. Philip Tong: Advisory board honoraria from La‐Roche Posay. Anneliese Willems: Advisory Board Member for La Roche‐Posay, Dercos, Amgen, Eczema Support Australia and QUM Alliance.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dulama Richani, PhD CMPP of WriteSource Medical Pty Ltd., Sydney, Australia, for providing medical writing support. Medical writing support was funded by La Roche‐Posay in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP2022) guidelines (https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M22‐1460).

Funding: This work was supported by L’Oreal.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

References

  • 1. Layton A. M., Thiboutot D., and Tan J., “Reviewing the Global Burden of Acne: How Could We Improve Care to Reduce the Burden?,” British Journal of Dermatology 184, no. 2 (2021): 219–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tan J. K. and Bhate K., “A Global Perspective on the Epidemiology of Acne,” British Journal of Dermatology 172, no. Suppl 1 (2015): 3–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dagnelie M. A., Poinas A., and Dréno B., “What Is New in Adult Acne for the Last 2 Years: Focus on Acne Pathophysiology and Treatments,” International Journal of Dermatology 61, no. 10 (2022): 1205–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Koo J., “The Psychosocial Impact of Acne: Patients' Perceptions,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 32, no. 5 Pt 3 (1995): S26–S30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gebauer K., “Acne in Adolescence,” Australian Family Physician 46, no. 12 (2017): 892–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zaenglein A. L., Pathy A. L., Schlosser B. J., et al., “Guidelines of Care for the Management of Acne Vulgaris,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 74, no. 5 (2016): 945–973.e33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nast A., Rosumeck S., Erdmann R., Alsharif U., Dressler C., and Werner R. N., “Methods Report on the Development of the European Evidence‐Based (S3) Guideline for the Treatment of Acne—Update 2016,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 30, no. 8 (2016): e1–e28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Acne , Therapeutic Guidelines (Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; ) (2022), accessed 2023 Sept 20, https://www.tg.org.au. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hazarika N. and Archana M., “The Psychosocial Impact of Acne Vulgaris,” Indian Journal of Dermatology 61, no. 5 (2016): 515–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ozkesici Kurt B., “Comparison of the Psychosocial Impact of Acne in Adolescents and Adults; Body Satisfaction, Self‐Esteem, and Quality of Life,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 21, no. 2 (2022): 836–843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Araviiskaia E., Lopez Estebaranz J. L., and Pincelli C., “Dermocosmetics: Beneficial Adjuncts in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris,” Journal of Dermatological Treatment 32, no. 1 (2021): 3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Dréno B., Bettoli V., Araviiskaia E., Sanchez Viera M., and Bouloc A., “The Influence of Exposome on Acne,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 32, no. 5 (2018): 812–819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Clayton R. W., Göbel K., Niessen C. M., Paus R., van Steensel M. A. M., and Lim X., “Homeostasis of the Sebaceous Gland and Mechanisms of Acne Pathogenesis,” British Journal of Dermatology 181, no. 4 (2019): 677–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Saurat J. H., “Strategic Targets in Acne: The Comedone Switch in Question,” Dermatology 231, no. 2 (2015): 105–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Shang W., Tan A. Y. Q., van Steensel M. A. M., and Lim X., “Aberrant Wnt Signaling Induces Comedo‐Like Changes in the Murine Upper Hair Follicle,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 142, no. 10 (2022): 2603–2612.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cros M. P., Mir‐Pedrol J., Toloza L., et al., “New Insights Into the Role of Cutibacterium Acnes‐Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Inflammatory Skin Disorders,” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1 (2023): 16058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dreno B., Dekio I., Baldwin H., et al., “Acne Microbiome: From Phyla to Phylotypes,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 38, no. 4 (2024): 657–664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Gollnick H. P., “From New Findings in Acne Pathogenesis to New Approaches in Treatment,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 29, no. Suppl 5 (2015): 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Layton A. M., Alexis A., Baldwin H., et al., “The Personalized Acne Treatment Tool—Recommendations to Facilitate a Patient‐Centered Approach to Acne Management From the Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts,” JAAD International 12 (2023): 60–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Dréno B., Thiboutot D., Gollnick H., et al., “Large‐Scale Worldwide Observational Study of Adherence With Acne Therapy,” International Journal of Dermatology 49, no. 4 (2010): 448–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Araviiskaia E., Layton A. M., Estebaranz J. L. L., Ochsendorf F., and Micali G., “The Synergy Between Pharmacological Regimens and Dermocosmetics and Its Impact on Adherence in Acne Treatment,” Dermatology Research and Practice 2022 (2022): 3644720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Thiboutot D., Layton A., Traore I., et al., “International Expert Consensus Recommendations for Use of Dermocosmetics in Acne,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 91, no. 3 (2024): 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kurokawa I., Kobayashi M., Nomura Y., Abe M., Kerob D., and Dreno B., “The Role and Benefits of Dermocosmetics in Acne Management in Japan,” Dermatology and Therapy 13, no. 7 (2023): 1423–1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Araviiskaia E. and Dréno B., “The Role of Topical Dermocosmetics in Acne Vulgaris,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 30, no. 6 (2016): 926–935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Varçin M. and Knapen C., “Focus on Cosmeceuticals: Definitions, Regulations and a Review of the Market,” PMFA Journal 3, no. 4 (2016): 36–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Bae I. H., Kwak J. H., Na C. H., Kim M. S., Shin B. S., and Choi H., “A Comprehensive Review of the Acne Grading Scale in 2023,” Annals of Dermatology 36, no. 2 (2024): 65–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Murase J. E., Heller M. M., and Butler D. C., “Safety of Dermatologic Medications in Pregnancy and Lactation: Part I. Pregnancy,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 70, no. 3 (2014): 401.e1–401.e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cook D., Krassas G., and Huang T., “Acne—Best Practice Management,” Australian Family Physician 39, no. 9 (2010): 656–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Dal Belo S. E., Kanoun‐Copy L., Lambert C., et al., “Efficacy of a Multitargeted, Salicylic Acid‐Based Dermocosmetic Cream Compared to Benzoyl Peroxide 5% in Acne Vulgaris: Results From a Randomized Study,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 23, no. 3 (2023): 891–897, 10.1111/jocd.16052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Khammari A., Demessant‐Flavigny A., Kerob D., Seité S., and Dréno B., “A Salicylic Acid‐Based Dermocosmetic Is Effective as an Adjunct to Benzoyl Peroxide for Mild to Moderate Acne and as Monotherapy in Maintenance Post Benzoyl Peroxide,” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology 22, no. 12 (2023): 1172–1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Matts P. J., Oblong J. E., and Bissett D. L., “A Review of the Range of Effects of Niacinamide in Human Skin,” IFSCC Mag 5, no. 4 (2002): 285–289. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Shalita A. R., Smith J. G., Parish L. C., Sofman M. S., and Chalker D. K., “Topical Nicotinamide Compared With Clindamycin Gel in the Treatment of Inflammatory Acne Vulgaris,” International Journal of Dermatology 34, no. 6 (1995): 434–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Shahmoradi Z., Iraji F., Siadat A. H., and Ghorbaini A., “Comparison of Topical 5% Nicotinamid Gel Versus 2% Clindamycin Gel in the Treatment of the Mild‐Moderate Acne Vulgaris: A Double‐Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial,” Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 18, no. 2 (2013): 115–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Khodaeiani E., Fouladi R. F., Amirnia M., Saeidi M., and Karimi E. R., “Topical 4% Nicotinamide vs. 1% Clindamycin in Moderate Inflammatory Acne Vulgaris,” International Journal of Dermatology 52, no. 8 (2013): 999–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Draelos Z. D., Matsubara A., and Smiles K., “The Effect of 2% Niacinamide on Facial Sebum Production,” Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy 8, no. 2 (2006): 96–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Biedermann K., Lammers K., Mrowczyn‐ski E., et al., “Regulation of Sebum Production by Niacinamide. 60th Annual Meeting American Academy of Dermatology; New Orleans,” 2002.
  • 37. Bissett D. L., Miyamoto K., Sun P., Li J., and Berge C. A., “Topical Niacinamide Reduces Yellowing, Wrinkling, Red Blotchiness, and Hyperpigmented Spots in Aging Facial Skin,” International Journal of Cosmetic Science 26, no. 5 (2004): 231–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Dreno B., Trossaert M., Boiteau H. L., and Litoux P., “Zinc Salts Effects on Granulocyte Zinc Concentration and Chemotaxis in Acne Patients,” Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 72, no. 4 (1992): 250–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yee B. E., Richards P., Sui J. Y., and Marsch A. F., “Serum Zinc Levels and Efficacy of Zinc Treatment in Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Dermatologic Therapy 33, no. 6 (2020): e14252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Weimar V. M., Puhl S. C., Smith W. H., and tenBroeke J. E., “Zinc Sulfate in Acne Vulgaris,” Archives of Dermatology 114, no. 12 (1978): 1776–1778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Sharquie K. E., Noaimi A. A., and Al‐Salih M. M., “Topical Therapy of Acne Vulgaris Using 2% Tea Lotion in Comparison With 5% Zinc Sulphate Solution,” Saudi Medical Journal 29, no. 12 (2008): 1757–1761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Langner A., Sheehan‐Dare R., and Layton A., “A Randomized, Single‐Blind Comparison of Topical Clindamycin + Benzoyl Peroxide (Duac) and Erythromycin + Zinc Acetate (Zineryt) in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Facial Acne Vulgaris,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 21, no. 3 (2007): 311–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gueniche A., Liboutet M., Cheilian S., Fagot D., Juchaux F., and Breton L., “ Vitreoscilla filiformis Extract for Topical Skin Care: A Review,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 11 (2021): 747663, 10.3389/fcimb.2021.747663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mottin V. H. M. and Suyenaga E. S., “An Approach on the Potential Use of Probiotics in the Treatment of Skin Conditions: Acne and Atopic Dermatitis,” International Journal of Dermatology 57, no. 12 (2018): 1425–1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kwon H. H., Yoon J. Y., Park S. Y., Min S., and Suh D. H., “Comparison of Clinical and Histological Effects Between Lactobacillus‐Fermented Chamaecyparis Obtusa and Tea Tree Oil for the Treatment of Acne: An Eight‐Week Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Split‐Face Study,” Dermatology 229, no. 2 (2014): 102–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Yang J. H., Yoon J. Y., Kwon H. H., Min S., Moon J., and Suh D. H., “Seeking New Acne Treatment From Natural Products, Devices and Synthetic Drug Discovery,” Dermato‐Endocrinology 9, no. 1 (2017): e1356520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Muizzuddin N., Maher W., Sullivan M., Schnittger S., and Mammone T., “Physiological Effect of a Probiotic on Skin,” Journal of Cosmetic Science 63, no. 6 (2012): 385–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Johnson B. A. and Nunley J. R., “Topical Therapy for Acne Vulgaris. How Do You Choose the Best Drug for Each Patient?,” Postgraduate Medicine 107, no. 3 (2000): 69–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Levesque A., Hamzavi I., Seite S., Rougier A., and Bissonnette R., “Randomized Trial Comparing a Chemical Peel Containing a Lipophilic Hydroxy Acid Derivative of Salicylic Acid With a Salicylic Acid Peel in Subjects With Comedonal Acne,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 10, no. 3 (2011): 174–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Kar B. R., Tripathy S., and Panda M., “Comparative Study of Oral Isotretinoin Versus Oral Isotretinoin + 20% Salicylic Acid Peel in the Treatment of Active Acne,” Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 6, no. 4 (2013): 204–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Shalita A. R., “Comparison of a Salicylic Acid Cleanser and a Benzoyl Peroxide Wash in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris,” Clinical Therapeutics 11, no. 2 (1989): 264–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. eTG , “eTG complete: Acne (Australian Therapeutic guidelines 2020),” (2020), https://tgldcdp.tg.org.au/searchAction?appendedinputbuttons=acne.
  • 53. Zeichner J. A., “The Use of Lipohydroxy Acid in Skin Care and Acne Treatment,” Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology 9, no. 11 (2016): 40–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Uhoda E., Piérard‐Franchimont C., and Piérard G. E., “Comedolysis by a Lipohydroxyacid Formulation in Acne‐Prone Subjects,” European Journal of Dermatology 13, no. 1 (2003): 65–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Bissonnette R., Bolduc C., Seité S., et al., “Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerance of a Lipophillic Hydroxy Acid Derivative of Salicylic Acid and 5% Benzoyl Peroxide in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 8, no. 1 (2009): 19–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Conforti C., Giuffrida R., Fadda S., et al., “Topical Dermocosmetics and Acne Vulgaris,” Dermatologic Therapy 34, no. 1 (2021): e14436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Abels C., Kaszuba A., Michalak I., Werdier D., Knie U., and Kaszuba A., “A 10% Glycolic Acid Containing Oil‐In‐Water Emulsion Improves Mild Acne: A Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trial,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 10, no. 3 (2011): 202–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Poli F., Ribet V., Lauze C., Adhoute H., and Morinet P., “Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Retinaldehyde/6% Glycolic Acid (Diacneal) for Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris. A Multicentre, Double‐Blind, Randomized, Vehicle‐Controlled Trial,” Dermatology 210, no. Suppl 1 (2005): 14–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Dreno B., Castell A., Tsankov N., et al., “Interest of the Association Retinaldehyde/Glycolic Acid in Adult Acne,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 23, no. 5 (2009): 529–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Dréno B., Nocera T., Verrière F., et al., “Topical Retinaldehyde With Glycolic Acid: Study of Tolerance and Acceptability in Association With Anti‐Acne Treatments in 1,709 Patients,” Dermatology 210, no. Suppl 1 (2005): 22–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Abels C., Reich H., Knie U., Werdier D., and Lemmnitz G., “Significant Improvement in Mild Acne Following a Twice Daily Application for 6 Weeks of an Acidic Cleansing Product (pH 4),” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 13, no. 2 (2014): 103–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Chandrashekar B. S., Ashwini K. R., Vasanth V., and Navale S., “Retinoic Acid and Glycolic Acid Combination in the Treatment of Acne Scars,” Indian Dermatology Online Journal 6, no. 2 (2015): 84–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Shalita A. R., Chalker D. K., Griffith R. F., et al., “Tazarotene Gel Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Multicenter, Double‐Blind, Vehicle‐Controlled Study,” Cutis 63, no. 6 (1999): 349–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Krishnan G., “Comparison of Two Concentrations of Tretinoin Solution in the Topical Treatment of Acne Vulgaris,” Practitioner 216, no. 1291 (1976): 106–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Lucky A. W., Cullen S. I., Funicella T., Jarratt M. T., Jones T., and Reddick M. E., “Double‐Blind, Vehicle‐Controlled, Multicenter Comparison of Two 0.025% Tretinoin Creams in Patients With Acne Vulgaris,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 38, no. 4 (1998): S24–S30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Morel P., Vienne M. P., Beylot C., et al., “Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Topical Combination of Retinaldehyde 0.1% With Erythromycin 4% in Acne Vulgaris,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 24, no. 5 (1999): 354–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. O'Neill A. M. and Gallo R. L., “Host‐Microbiome Interactions and Recent Progress Into Understanding the Biology of Acne Vulgaris,” Microbiome 6, no. 1 (2018): 177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Dessinioti C. and Katsambas A., “Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance in Acne: Epidemiological Trends and Clinical Practice Considerations,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 95, no. 4 (2022): 429–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Kircik L. H., “Re‐Evaluating Treatment Targets in Acne Vulgaris: Adapting to a New Understanding of Pathophysiology,” Journal of Drugs in Dermatology 13, no. 6 (2014): s57–s60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Goh C. L., Noppakun N., Micali G., et al., “Meeting the Challenges of Acne Treatment in Asian Patients: A Review of the Role of Dermocosmetics as Adjunctive Therapy,” Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 9, no. 2 (2016): 85–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Nast A., Dréno B., Bettoli V., et al., “European Evidence‐Based (S3) Guideline for the Treatment of Acne—Update 2016—Short Version,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 30, no. 8 (2016): 1261–1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Leyden J. J., Wortzman M., and Baldwin E. K., “Antibiotic‐Resistant Propionibacterium Acnes Suppressed by a Benzoyl Peroxide Cleanser 6%,” Cutis 82, no. 6 (2008): 417–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Matin T. and Goodman M. B., “Benzoyl Peroxide,” in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing; ) (2022), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537220/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Hammer K. A., “Treatment of Acne With Tea Tree Oil (Melaleuca) Products: A Review of Efficacy, Tolerability and Potential Modes of Action,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 45, no. 2 (2015): 106–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Enshaieh S., Jooya A., Siadat A. H., and Iraji F., “The Efficacy of 5% Topical Tea Tree Oil Gel in Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized, Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Study,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 73, no. 1 (2007): 22–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. de Groot A. C. and Schmidt E., “Tea Tree Oil: Contact Allergy and Chemical Composition,” Contact Dermatitis 75, no. 3 (2016): 129–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Al‐Shobaili H. A., “Oxidants and Anti‐Oxidants Status in Acne Vulgaris Patients With Varying Severity,” Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science 44, no. 2 (2014): 202–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Bungau A. F., Radu A. F., Bungau S. G., Vesa C. M., Tit D. M., and Endres L. M., “Oxidative Stress and Metabolic Syndrome in Acne Vulgaris: Pathogenetic Connections and Potential Role of Dietary Supplements and Phytochemicals,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 164 (2023): 115003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Prakash C., Bhargava P., Tiwari S., Majumdar B., and Bhargava R. K., “Skin Surface pH in Acne Vulgaris: Insights From an Observational Study and Review of the Literature,” Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology 10, no. 7 (2017): 33–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Thiboutot D. and Del Rosso J. Q., “Acne Vulgaris and the Epidermal Barrier: Is Acne Vulgaris Associated With Inherent Epidermal Abnormalities That Cause Impairment of Barrier Functions? Do any Topical Acne Therapies Alter the Structural and/or Functional Integrity of the Epidermal Barrier?,” Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology 6, no. 2 (2013): 18–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Dréno B., Araviiskaia E., Kerob D., et al., “Nonprescription Acne Vulgaris Treatments: Their Role in Our Treatment Armamentarium—An International Panel Discussion,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 19, no. 9 (2020): 2201–2211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Li W., Yu Q., Shen Z., Zhang L., Zhang W., and Li C., “Efficacy and Safety of a Cream Containing Octyl Salicylic Acid, Salicylic Acid, Linoleic Acid, Nicotinamide, and Piroctone Olamine Combined With 5% Benzoyl Peroxide in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized Controlled Study,” Chinese Medical Journal 135, no. 11 (2022): 1381–1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Tan J., Bissonnette R., Gratton D., Kerrouche N., and Canosa J. M., “The Safety and Efficacy of Four Different Fixed Combination Regimens of Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Results From a Randomised Controlled Study,” European Journal of Dermatology 28, no. 4 (2018): 502–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Karamon E., Czermańska A., Kerob D., et al., “Benefits of a Dermocosmetic Regimen in the Management of Local Side Effects Triggered by a Topical Retinoid‐Based Acne Treatment,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 23, no. 3 (2023): 1091–1093, 10.1111/jocd.16055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Khammari A., Kerob D., Demessant A. L., Nioré M., and Dréno B., “A Dermocosmetic Regimen Is Able to Mitigate Skin Sensitivity Induced by a Retinoid‐Based Fixed Combination Treatment for Acne: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 23, no. 4 (2024): 1313–1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Monfrecola G., Capasso C., Russo G., and Fabbrocini G., “UV‐Selective Face Cream (Acne RA‐1,2) in Acne Patients: Clinical Study of Its Effects on Epidermal Barrier Function, Sebum Production, Tolerability and Therapy Adherence,” Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 153, no. 1 (2018): 26–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Dall'oglio F., Tedeschi A., Fabbrocini G., Veraldi S., Picardo M., and Micali G., “Cosmetics for Acne: Indications and Recommendations for an Evidence‐Based Approach,” Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 150, no. 1 (2015): 1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Yorulmaz A. and Yalcin B., “Myths, Perceptions and Practices in Acne: A Study on Adolescents and Young Adults,” Current Health Sciences Journal 46, no. 2 (2020): 111–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Ansari F., Khare A. K., and Gupta L. K., “Myths, Misconceptions and Attitudinal Trends Among Patients With Acne,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 89, no. 4 (2023): 572–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Raznatovic Durovic M., Jankovic J., Durovic M., Spiric J., and Jankovic S., “Adolescents' Beliefs and Perceptions of Acne Vulgaris: A Cross‐Sectional Study in Montenegrin Schoolchildren,” PLoS One 16, no. 6 (2021): e0253421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Toy J., Wan V., Lee D. G., Liu C., Fleming P., and Lynde C., “Perspectives and Knowledge of Acne Vulgaris Among Young Adolescents,” Pediatric Dermatology 40, no. 2 (2023): 308–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Piquero‐Casals J., Morgado‐Carrasco D., Rozas‐Muñoz E., et al., “Sun Exposure, a Relevant Exposome Factor in Acne Patients and How Photoprotection Can Improve Outcomes,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 22, no. 6 (2023): 1919–1928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Lee W. J., Chae S. Y., Ryu H. S., Jang Y. H., Lee S. J., and Kim D. W., “Inflammatory Cytokine Expression and Sebum Production After Exposure of Cultured Human Sebocytes to Ultraviolet A Radiation and Light at Wavelengths of 650 Nm and 830 Nm,” Annals of Dermatology 27, no. 2 (2015): 163–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Gfesser M. and Worret W. I., “Seasonal Variations in the Severity of Acne Vulgaris,” International Journal of Dermatology 35, no. 2 (1996): 116–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Magin P., Pond D., Smith W., and Watson A., “A Systematic Review of the Evidence for ‘Myths and Misconceptions’ in Acne Management: Diet, Face‐Washing and Sunlight,” Family Practice 22, no. 1 (2005): 62–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.“Acne,” Australian Journal for General Practitioners 39 (2012): 656–660. [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Lee W. J., Park K. H., Sohn M. Y., Lee W. C., Lee S. J., and Kim D. W., “Ultraviolet B Irradiation Increases the Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines in Cultured Sebocytes,” Journal of Dermatology 40, no. 12 (2013): 993–997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Bhate K. and Williams H. C., “Epidemiology of Acne Vulgaris,” British Journal of Dermatology 168, no. 3 (2013): 474–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Choi J. M., Lew V. K., and Kimball A. B., “A Single‐Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Face Washing on Acne Vulgaris,” Pediatric Dermatology 23, no. 5 (2006): 421–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Towersey L., Correia P., Fajgenbaum Feiges M., et al., “Assessment of the Benefit of a Deep Cleansing Gel Containing Salicylic Acid 2%, Zinc Gluconate 0.2% and Lipohydroxy Acids 0.05% in Patients With Mild to Moderate Truncal Acne: Results From an Exploratory Study,” Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 16 (2023): 119–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Towersey L., Correia P., Feiges M. F., and Kerob D., “Efficacy of a Deep Cleansing Gel in the Management of Mild to Moderate Facial Acne,” Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 23 (2024): 2762–2763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Thiboutot D. M., Dreno B., Abanmi A., et al., “Practical Management of Acne for Clinicians: An International Consensus From the Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 78, no. 2 Suppl 1 (2018): S1–S23.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.


Articles from The Australasian Journal of Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES