Skip to main content
Scientifica logoLink to Scientifica
. 2025 Jun 1;2025:2409286. doi: 10.1155/sci5/2409286

Exploring Genetic Diversity: Optimizing Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers in Crotalaria for Enhanced Precision in Biodiversity Research

Phenny Sharon Odhoch 1, Nancy L M Budambula 1,, Felix Kiprotich 2, Joshua Kiilu Muli 1
PMCID: PMC12145933  PMID: 40486246

Abstract

Crotalaria is a plant genus with more than 700 species of shrubs and herbs. Despite its potential economic importance, Crotalaria has received limited research attention; hence, there is limited information on its genetic diversity. Hence, there is need to establish its genetic diversity as a foundation for its conservation and breeding. The current study aimed to optimize and validate simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers polymerase chain reaction—conditions for the assessment of genetic diversity in Crotalaria. The genomic DNA of 31 Crotalaria accessions was extracted from 2-week-old leaves using a modified CTAB protocol and Quick-DNA Plant/Seed Kits (Zymo Research Corp) were used for recalcitrant samples. The samples were then amplified using the 29 SSR markers under the optimized conditions. The polymorphism information content (PIC) of the polymorphic markers was calculated to determine their effectiveness. This study determined that the optimal concentrations of dNTPs, MgCl2, and primers as 2.5, 2, and 5 mM, respectively, and the quantity of the DNA template was 1 μL, and the quantity of Taq was 0.125 μL in a 25 μL reaction mixture. The mean PIC value was 0.233, which shows that the markers were slightly informative. The marker PC004 was the most informative marker with the highest PIC value (0.605) and it detected the largest number of alleles despite being a hexanucleotide motif repeat. Its uniqueness augments its potential use in the assessment of genetic diversity. This study implies that the SSR markers designed and optimized for the study are significant for genetic diversity and population structure analysis of Crotalaria species and molecular verification of Crotalaria genotypes as well as other related genera. Besides, the results of the study form a basis for genetic improvement of Crotalaria.

Keywords: biodiversity, Crotalaria, genetic diversity, polymorphic information content, simple sequence repeats

1. Introduction

The genus Crotalaria is a member of the Family Fabaceae and the Subfamily Aboideau [1]. The genus is large and comprises approximately 702 species. Members of this genus are extensively distributed in the Southern Hemisphere [2]. About 543 species in the genus are distributed in subtropical and tropical Africa and Madagascar. The Fabaceae family has the largest number of indigenous vascular plants in Kenya with 93 species in the genus Crotalaria [3]. Plants in the genus Crotalaria have several uses including green manure, ethnomedicinal uses, silage, nitrogen fixation, use in weed control as a cover crop, ornamental plants, nematode control, and prevention of soil erosion [4]. Several species of this genus such as C. juncea have exhibited antimicrobial properties, making them a promising collection of plant products. Research has found that extracts from different parts of Crotalaria species, such as leaves of C. capensis and C. madurensis, the flowers and seeds of C. pallida and C. juncea, and the root of C. burhia, show antimicrobial activity against various bacteria, such as Enetroccocus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus cereus [5]. Despite their industrial potential and economic importance, these species have received little research attention, thus information on their genetic diversity remains scanty [6]. Consequently, few genetic markers exist to facilitate the study of the plant's diversity.

Genetic diversity of crops plays a critical role in food security and sustainable development since it serves as a source of genes essential in the development of well adapted and better performing varieties. To assess the genetic diversity of a specific crop, molecular (genotype) and morphological (phenotype) markers have been applied. However, morphological traits are susceptible to environmental factors, limited in number, and may vary at varied stages of development. Molecular markers have been found to be better than morphological traits since they are neutral to environmental needs and abundant in organisms. Molecular methods differ with respect to the significant features; for instance, the level of polymorphism detected, genomic abundance, technical requirements, reproducibility, locus specificity, and cost. The use of molecular markers is a strong strategy for understanding the genetics of numerous models associated with agricultural science. Breeders use these markers to provide beneficial genetic information [7].

Despite several economically important species being within this genus, few studies have been done since there are few DNA markers and familiar functional genes in this genus [8]. Most species in this genus are not major crops; thus, there are few attempts to sequence them. Transferred simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers have been used to assess Crotalaria's genetic diversity besides examining its germplasm's phylogenetic relationships. The first study in which polymorphic expressed sequence tag-SSR (EST-SSR) markers were obtained was reported by Wang et al. [9]. The markers were obtained from soybean and Medicago to assess the genetic diversity of Crotalaria germplasm collection. Satya et al. [6] reported the use of SCoT markers in the study of diversity among C. pallida, C. retusa L, C. verrucosa L, C. nana, C. laburnifolia, and C. juncea. The SCoT markers were not fit for the diversity assessment of some species like C. retusa L, although they were found to be consistent for the genetic assessment of the genus. Another study by Rather et al. [10] on the genetic diversity using ITS and matK gene led to the discovery of two species, namely, C. suffruticosa and C. multibracteata. The two regions would be more dependable in detecting inter- and intraspecific polymorphism in different plant species. On the other hand, transferred SSR markers have been utilized to assess genetic diversity and investigate plant germplasm's phylogenetic relationships [9]. Another effort by the group did not succeed in amplifying SSR from soybean and Medicago in Crotalaria, showing that sequence-specific SSR markers are essential for Crotalaria for microsatellite-linked genetic analysis. Diverse genetic resources provide plant breeders with a better chance of creating new and improved cultivars. Currently, agronomic trait control is believed to be regulated by multiple genes. The primary goal of creating contemporary cultivars is to identify the best genes associated with these traits. Presumably, during Crotalaria domestication and introduction to new areas, advantageous alleles may have been lost due to genetic bottlenecks [11]. The accessions selected for a breeding program must have and be able to transfer beneficial rare alleles absent in elite germplasm, making it essential to understand the origin of these alleles. Novel genes for a target trait are likely to be available from accessions that deviate significantly from elite genotypes [11]. Selecting accessions from the existing germplasm to employ in breeding operations is challenging. Understanding the genetic diversity of genotypes of Crotalaria will aid geneticists and breeders in unraveling the germplasm's structure, thus enabling them to select parents with higher genetic diversity and hastening the development of genetic resources [11].

Generally, the occurrence of SSRs or microsatellites in tropical fodder legumes has not been extensively explored, making the study of their genetic diversity challenging. The SSR markers may give more accurate results in estimating genetic diversity than other genomic markers [12]. They have been widely successfully used in the determination of genetic diversity among plant species compared to other molecular markers because of their multiple-allelic property, codominance, and relative abundance [13, 14]. The SSR markers are fundamental in pedigree analysis, genotype differentiation, assessing genetic distances among genotypes, and identification of varieties. These tandem repeats are distributed uniformly in the whole genome and have a high reproducibility as well as polymorphic information content (PIC) [15]. Besides, they differ in the polymorphism they detect based on sequence of the repeat motif they have and length, as well as their location in the noncoding or coding regions of the genome [11, 16].

Genetic diversity is the most significant aspect limiting the average number of alleles (N) identified in each SSR locus in a screening program [16]. Despite its potential economic importance, Crotalaria has received limited research attention; hence, there is limited information on its genetic diversity. Hence, there is need to establish its genetic diversity as a foundation for its conservation and breeding. Breeders can improve certain local varieties and enhance production by assessing regional and local plant genotypes, which is crucial in determining germplasm diversity. Since Crotalaria is rarely utilized in many diversity studies, breeding strategies to improve the domesticated species through interspecific hybridization can be devised with the help of diversity assessment and relationship studies. The current study aimed to optimize and validate the use of 39 designed SSR markers in characterizing and assessing the genetic diversity of 31 Crotalaria accessions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Two replicates of 31 different Crotalaria accessions (Table 1) obtained from different regions of Kenya as described by Muli et al. [17] were investigated in this study. The seedlings were raised under greenhouse conditions at the University of Embu Farm. In this study, all accessions with a similar domestication status were considered a population. Hence, the investigated accessions were from either domesticated or wild populations.

Table 1.

Domesticated and wild Crotalaria accessions used in optimization and validation of SSR markers in the assessment of the genetic diversity.

S/N Crotalaria spp Sample number Domestication status
1 C. brevidens Benth var intermedia FVH-001 Domesticated
2 C. brevidens var brevidens FVH-002 Domesticated
3 C. brevidens var brevidens FHB-0217 Domesticated
4 C. ochroleuca G. Don FSY-0059 Domesticated
5 C. ochroleuca FKK-0091 Domesticated
6 C. ochroleuca FMG-233 Domesticated
7 C. trichotoma Bojer FVH-121 Domesticated
8 C. trichotoma FVH-150 Domesticated
9 C. trichotoma FMG-239 Domesticated
10 C. trichotoma FSY-216 Domesticated
11 C. trichotoma FHB-207 Domesticated
12 C. lanceolata E. Mey FMK-267 Wild
13 C. recta Steud.ex A. Rich GBK-05262 Wild
14 C. paulina Schrank GBK-05209 Wild
15 C. pancira GBK-05201 Wild
16 C. juncea L GBK-5199 Wild
17 C. greenwayi Baker f. GBK-05664 Wild
18 C. pallida Aiton GBK-05200 Wild
19 C. laburnifolia L. GBK-05189 Wild
20 C. endecaphyla GBK-05479 Wild
21 C. anagyroides Kunth GBK-5470 Wild
22 C. grahamiana Wight & Arn FBS-0041 Wild
23 C. spectabilis Roth GBK-5685 Wild
24 C. deserticola Taub. Ex Baker f. FMG-299 Wild
25 C. intermedia Kotshcy GBK-05230 Wild
26 C. intermedia GBK-5244 Wild
27 C. intermedia GBK-5231 Wild
28 C. spp FMG-301 Wild
29 C. incana L. GBK-5477 Wild
30 C. retusa L. GBK-5670 Wild
31 C. scassellatii Chiov GBK-47581 Wild

Note: The Crotalaria accessions and their respective sample numbers are listed, along with their domestication status. The domesticated and wild accessions were selected to examine the genetic variability within different cultivation environments.

2.2. Designing the SSR Markers

An earlier study determined the gene expression profile under drought and nondrought conditions, as well as the gene expression kinetics associated with phosphorous use efficiency in Crotalaria accessions [18]. Different Crotalaria accessions were subjected to drought conditions and different phosphorous regimens. The Illumina HiSeqTM 2500 system sequenced the RNA of the treatments and the control subjects. Following the de novo assembly of clean reads using Trinity software (V2.0.6), SSR markers from the CDS and the unigenes were mined using the Microsatellite identification tool (MISA, http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/misa.html) and then the primers for each SSR designed using Primer 3 [19]. The repeat sequence motifs entailed hexanucleotides, pentanucleotides, tetranucleotides, trinucleotides, dinucleotides, and mononucleotides. Each of these types of repeats plays a key role in determining the stability and specificity of SSR markers. A minimum repeat number of 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, and 12 was required for each type of repeat, respectively. The minimum distance between two SSRs for them to be considered distinct was set to 100 bp, while the maximum distance allowed between compound SSRs was 150 bp. To design the SSR primer pairs from the flanking sequences of the identified SSR motifs, Primer 3 an online web tool was used. For this study, a total of 39 SSR primers were randomly selected from all the designed primers. The SSR primers with the prefix D were from a drought tolerance study while those with the prefix P were from a phosphorous mobilization assay study.

2.3. DNA Isolation

Exactly 0.2 g of young 2-week-old leaves were carefully weighed and ground into fine powder for each Crotalaria accession. The total genomic DNA of each leaf sample was extracted using a modified CTAB protocol as described by Muli et al. [17]. Preventing phenolic compound and polysaccharide coprecipitation is still the greatest challenge during plant DNA extractions. Therefore, one of the modifications conducted was the addition of 30 μL of 4M Guanidinium thiocyanate (GITC) to the sample before incubation to separate the DNA from other parts of the cell, plant materials such as the polysaccharide materials, and the secondary metabolites in the recalcitrant samples, especially the wild population, and to enhance cell lysis. Besides, 50 μL of 3M sodium acetate was added before addition of the isopropanol to enhance precipitation of the DNA [20]. To the leaf powder, 500 μL of CTAB buffer (2% CTAB, 5M NaCl, 1M Tris-HCl, 0.5M EDTA, 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol, and 1% PVP) was added at room temperature and incubated at 65°C in a water bath for 30 min. Phenol:chloroform:isoamyl (25:24:1) alcohol was added to separate the DNA from other cellular substances, followed by precipitation with ice-cold isopropanol and washing with ice-cold 70% ethanol. The presence of the extracted DNA was confirmed using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.3.1. Isolation of DNA From Recalcitrant Samples

Besides the CTAB protocol, the study also used the Quick-DNA Plant/Seed Kits (Zymo Research Corp) to isolate DNA from recalcitrant samples as per manufacturer instructions. This alternative approached was applied due to its ease of extraction and high-quality DNA extraction, particularly when dealing with high phenol content which is a challenging material in Crotalaria. All the obtained DNA was stored at −80°C while awaiting subsequent procedures.

2.4. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification and Electrophoresis

A gradient PCR was done to determine the optimum annealing temperature for all the primers. The gradient PCR was performed to identify the optimal annealing temperature for each primer, as different sequences may bind most efficiently at different temperatures. This optimization step is crucial to ensure accurate and reproducible results across all markers. The process involved subjecting a DNA template to the PCR amplification process with varied annealing temperatures ranging from 44.4°C to 54.38°C. The PCR was performed in 25 μL reactions, containing 1 μL DNA template, 5 μL 5× standard buffer, 1 μL of 5 mM forward primer, 1 μL of 5 m reverse primer, 0.5 μL 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.125 μL Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolab), 2 mM magnesium chloride (MgCl2), and 17.375 μL nuclease-free water. The amplification was conducted in a thermocycler (Agilent Technologies SureCycler-8800 thermocycler) with the cycle profile of; initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles for 40 s at 94°C, 40 s annealing at varied annealing temperature interspecific to each primer set and extension at 2 min at 72°C. The final extension proceeded at 72°C for 5 min. The primers used in the study are listed in Table 2. The resultant amplicons were analyzed using gel electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel containing 3 μL Sybbr Green at 90 V for 40 min in 1× TAE buffer. The gel wells were loaded with 3 μL DNA products mixed with 2 μL 6× DNA loading dye. A 50-bp ladder was used as a DNA size reference.

Table 2.

Primer information of selected SSR markers optimized for diversity studies in Crotalaria.

Srl. no. SSR marker Forward primer (5′-3′) Reverse primer (5′-3′) Product size Annealing temperature (°C)
1 DC003 CATGAACACACATCACAGTTCCT CTTCTCCGTTTGAGAGCAAGTAA 107 49.3
2 DC004 GTTAAAGTTGTCACCCATGTTCC TCGGTGGTTTGAATATGTTTTTC 136 48
3 DC005 GTGCTCAAGAAGTGTGGGATCTA CAGTATGATATCACGCGAAGGAT 156 48
4 DC006 AATCAGCTTGAATCATCAACGTC GGTTTGGTTACTCTGCCATGTAG 132 49.7
5 DC007 AATACTTGTTTGCTTCAAATGCC AGTCAAGGTCTTTGATCTCGATG 108 47.8
6 DC008 TCATAAGGGAAATGAAACAGGAA ATTCAATCCTGATCTTCCTCCAC 155 47.3
7 DC009 AACCTCTCCTCTTCTCCATCATC AAGAAGGATCTTTTTGGGTTTTG 127 47.5
8 DC010 CTTGCTACACGAAAACTGTCAGA TGTGTCGTGGTTCAATACAGTTC 132 53.49
9 DC011 GAGTGAGCTATGGTTTCTCCAAA TGGCCTATTTTAGTGGCATTGTA 137 49.7
10 DC012 CGGAGAATTTCCACTTGATACA TTCAGCGAAAACCCTACTCACTA 131 49.7
11 DC013 CCTCCATCTACCATCTCTGCTT AAGTCAATGGAGAGCAATTTGAG 156 48.4
12 DC014 CTGGTCGGAGTTTGTATTTGAAC TTCTTCACTTCCTCACCTCTCTG 142 48.4
13 DC016 GACACCACAGAGTCAAAGATGTG ATAGTTTTCTGGGAAAGTTTGGG 150 50.6
14 DC017 ATTAGCATTTCATCACCTTCACC TTTTGGATCTGATTTTGGAATTG 154 48.1
15 DU019 TCATATGGAAATATTTTATTGGAAA CACGAAGAAGAAGGGTTTGCT 235 48.1
16 PC002 TGGATAGTAGCAAGGGTGCTAAA CACTCTCTCCGACTGAAGCTAAA 160 50.6
17 PC003 CCTCCACCTCTTTCTTCACTGAC AATTTGATTTGTTTGCTGCAGTT 139 50.6
18 PC004 ATACTCATTTTCTGTGGAAGCCA TTTATTGCAGCAAGAGAAGATCC 96 48
19 PC005 AGATCAGATTCTTGCAAGCTCAC ATTGCCAACTTTAACTCCTCTCC 129 50.6
20 PC006 AACCACCAAACAAACACCACTT TCGATTGTCCACGTCTAATTTCT 157 47.8
21 PC008 CTCGTATTTCTCACAAACCCAAC ACCATATGGGGAGTTAGAAGAGC 89 48.4
22 PC009 TACTCCATTCATTCACCACCTTT TTGATCTCTTCAAGGCTGATACC 83 49.7
23 PC010 ACACCATAGCTTTTTCTTCCACA AGGGAGCGAGAATCATAGCTAAC 147 49.7
24 PC011 CGCTAGAGTGCCATAATCAAATC ATTTGGAAATAGGAAATTATAGTAACA 127 49.7
25 PC012 GTGTCAGGTACGAAATCTGGAAA CCCGTTTACTTGTTGTTTGCTTA 154 47.8
26 PC014 GGTCTCTTTCTTCTCCATCCACT GAATTGGAAACCCTAACAACGAT 154 49.7
27 PC015 TTTCATCAGCAGTTCAACACAAT GGGGGATTGAAACTTGATGTATT 152 47.8
28 PC017 CTAACTCCACCAAGTTTGCTGTT ATCAAGCCCTTATCTTTCTCAGC 136 49.7
29 PU020 TCGCTTTTAACCATCACTGAAAT GAGGAAGAGTTGAAATTGAGGGT 116 48.0

Note: Markers were chosen based on amplification efficiency, specificity, and polymorphism potential.

2.5. Genetic Analysis and Data Processing

Consistent and reproducible SSR bands were scored separately as absent (0) or present (1) in a spreadsheet for the 31 Crotalaria genotypes. The PIC values were calculated for the polymorphic markers PIC = 1 − ∑(pi2), where pi is the allele frequency of the ith allele. The genetic distance (D) between the two populations was estimated using the Pairwise Population Matrix of Nei's Unbiased Genetic Distance. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed using the DARwin software 6.0.021. The PCoA model is based on distance and uses a dissimilarity matrix that is computed by a combination of factorial analysis and a simple matching index. The PCoA was conducted to evaluate the structure patterns among the 31 accessions of Crotalaria. Gene structure data analysis was conducted using GeneAlex software (V 6.5). DARwin and GeneAlex software were chosen for their comprehensive analysis capabilities and userfriendly interfaces. These programs are widely used for genetic diversity studies and offer robust tools for calculating genetic distance and conducting PCoA. Compared with other available software, they provide more accurate results in large datasets due to their efficient computational algorithms.

3. Results

3.1. Optimization of PCR Conditions

The results from the different primer sets showed that annealing temperatures ranging from 48.0°C to 53.49°C typically produced the best results when using 5 mM primers, 2 mM MgCl2, and 2.5 mM dNTP (Table 3). Primers DC009, DC010, DC012, and PC009 amplified within the temperature range (46.4°C–49.7°C). All the other SSR markers that produced single bands within the temperature ranges were selected as best primers based on clear DNA amplicons. Three primers (DC015, PU019, and PC013) produced several banding patterns of undesired sizes instead of 114, 153, and 158 bp, which were the desired sizes. Therefore, certain primers were noncompliant with optimization. Seven SSR primers (DC002, PC001, DU018, PU018, DC001, PC016, and PC007) did not amplify within the gradient temperature range tested even after optimization of the MgCl2 and dNTPs concentrations. These seven primers are refractory to optimization and were eliminated. Subsequently, only the remaining 29 SSR primers were used.

Table 3.

The concentrations and quantities of final optimized PCR conditions for 29 SSR primers in 25 μL PCR reaction mix for the analysis of genetic diversity among the 31 Crotalaria accessions.

Component Concentration Volume (μL)
DNA template 1
Taq standard buffer 5
DNTPs 2.5 mM 0.5
Forward primer 5 mM 1.25
Reverse primer 5 mM 1.25
Taq polymerase 0.125
MgCl2 2 mM 0.75
H2O 15.125

The annealing temperatures of the primers were determined by running a gradient PCR for the primers using one DNA sample, across the different temperature ranges (from 44.4°C to 56.0°C). All the primers were tested across various temperatures, which led to varied product intensities when observed on 2.0% agarose gel. Eight markers (DC006, DC011, DC012. PC009, PC010, PC011, PC014, and PC017) amplified well at 49.7°C. Four markers (DC004, DC005, PC004, and PU020) amplified at 48.0°C, two markers (DC017 and DU019) amplified at 48.1°C, and three markers (PC008, DC014, and DC013) amplified at 48.4°C. Only DC009 amplified well at 47.5°C. The markers DC007, PC006, PC012, and PC015 amplified at 47.8°C, DC008 amplified well at 47.3°C while DC003 amplified at 49.3°C. DC010 amplified well at 53.49°C and four markers (DC016, DU019, PC002, and PC005) amplified at 50.6°C. The optimum MgCl2 and dNTP concentrations were 2.0 and 2.5 mM, respectively. Finally, the PCR was conducted in a 25 μL reaction, containing 1 μL DNA template, 5 μL 5× standard buffer, 1 μL of 5 mM forward primer, 1 μL of 5 mM reverse primer, 0.5 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.125 μL Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs), 2 mM MgCl2, and 17.375 μL nuclease-free water (Tables 3 and 4). For all the investigated SSR markers, the optimal PCR conditions were similar, except for the annealing temperatures, which were specific to each marker as shown in Table 2.

Table 4.

Summary of PCR optimization for the SSR primers. Amplification did not occur at 1.0 and 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 5.0 and 10 mM dNTPs concentrations.

Primer Product size (bp) Annealing temp (°C) MgCl2 (mM) dNTPs (mM) Amplification result
DC012 131 49.7 2.0 2.5 Single clear band
DC013 156
PC017 136

DC006 132 49.7 2.0 2.5 Multiple clear bands
DC011 137
PC009 83
PC010 147
PC011 127
PC014 154

DC004 136 48.0 2.0 2.5 Multiple clear bands
DC005 156
PC004 96
PU020 116

DC017 154 48.1 2.0 2.5 Single clear band
DU019 235

DC014 142 48.4 2.0 2.5 Single clear band

PC008 89 48.4 2.0 2.5 Multiple clear bands

PC002 160 50.6 2.0 2.5 Single clear bond
PC005 129

PC003 139 50.6 2.0 2.5 Multiple clear bands
PC004 96

DC010 139 53.49 2.0 2.5 Multiple clear bands

DC007 108 47.8 2.0 2.5 Single clear band
PC006 154

PC012 154 47.8 2.0 2.5 Multiple clear bands
PC015 152

DC015 Varying from 48.0 to 53.49 (gradient) Several banding patterns of undesired sizes instead of 114, 153, and 158 bp, which were the desired sizes
PU019
PC013

DC002, PC001, DU018, PU018, DC001, PC016, PC007 Varying from 48.0 to 53.49 (gradient) No amplification

3.2. Selection of the SSR Markers

The extracted plant DNA was amplified with the final optimal reaction mixture with the determined concentrations of Taq polymerase, dNTPs, and MgCl2 recorded in Table 3. After optimizing the PCR parameters that yielded good results, validation of the parameters was done to assess the genetic diversity in the 31 Crotalaria accessions. Sixteen markers were found to be polymorphic, while 13 markers produced monomorphic bands (DC007, DC008, DC009, DC012, DC013, DC014, DC017, DU019, PC002, PC005, PC006, PC012, PC017, and PC013).

3.3. Genetic Properties of the SSR Markers

Each of the 29 SSR markers had different abilities to determine the genetic diversity among the different Crotalaria accessions. A total of 89 alleles were detected from the 31 Crotalaria accessions using the 29 SSR markers. A total of 89 alleles were detected from the 31 Crotalaria accessions using the 29 SSR markers. The primers that detected the highest number (3) of alleles in the wild population were PC015, PC004, DC016 and DC011, followed by DC004, DC005, DC006, DC013, PC008, and PU020, which detected two alleles. The other primers were monoallelic. The primer DC006 detected the highest N (3) in wild population. The other primers that detected alleles include DC003 (2), DC004(2), DC005 (2), DC007 (1), DC008 (1), DC009 (1), DC010 (2), DC011 (2), DC012 (1), DC013 (1), DC014 (1), DC016 (2), DC017 (1), DU019 (1), PC003 (2), PC004 (2), PC005 (2), PC006(1), PC008(3), PC009 (2), PC010 (2), PC011 (2), PC012 (1), PC014(2) PC015 (2), PC017 (1), PU020 (2), and PC002 (1). The average N detected by the SSR markers for the wild-type population was 1.483 per locus, while within the domesticated population, the mean was 1.586 per locus. The grand mean of the N detected was 1.534 per locus. The maximum N per locus was detected by the marker PC004 which detected four (4) alleles. The number of effective alleles (Ne) detected ranged from 1.000 to 2.667, with an average of 1.197, with the marker DC013 having the highest Ne (Table S1). The observed heterozygosity (Ho) in the wild population was 0.070 whereas in the domesticated population, it ranged from 0.000 to 0.500 with an average of 0.097. The Ho values between the two populations ranged from 0.000 to 0.500, with an average of 0.083. The expected heterozygosity (He) for the wild population ranged from 0.000 to 0.625 with an average of 0.113, while within the domesticated population, the He ranged from 0.000 to 0.420 with a mean of 0.125. The total means He of the two populations was 0.119.

The mean fixation index (FST) within the wild population was 0.234 and 0.181 for the domesticated population with a grand mean of 0.201. The average percentage of the polymorphic loci was found to be 44.83%. The domesticated population had a higher number of private alleles compared to the wild-type population. The mean number of private alleles for the wild and domesticated population was 0.345 and 0.414, respectively. Private alleles were observed in 26 different Crotalaria accessions (59, 121, 150, 02, 91, 217, 299, 41, GBK-5189, GBK-5199, GBK-5200, GBK-5201, GBK-5230, GBK-5244, GBK-5262, GBK-5470, GBK-5685, GBK-47581, GBK-5670, 207, 216, 233, 239, 301, GBK-5477, and GBK-5231). The PIC, which is a measure of the allelic diversity for a specific locus, ranged from 0.062 to 0.397, with a mean of 0.195 among the drought-resistant markers. For the phosphorus mobilization markers, the PIC ranged from 0.053 to 0.605, with a mean of 0.263. The marker PC004 had the maximum PIC value (0.605), while PC014 had the least value (0.053). Only one marker (PC004) had PIC value ≥ 0.50, while two markers (DC011 and PC009) had PIC values ranging between 0.30 and 0.490, and 13 markers (DC003, DC004, DC005, DC006, DC010, DC016, PC003, PC008, PC011, PC010, PU020, PC014, and PC015) having PIC values < 0.30. The PIC of all the polymorphic markers is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bar graph showing the polymorphic information content of the 16 polymorphic SSR markers in 31 Crotalaria accessions. The values plotted on the graph represent standardized proportions of the total polymorphic markers (7 markers designed from a drought tolerance study and 9 designed from phosphorus mobilization assay study).

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was calculated using the matrix distances for genetic differentiation. The analysis revealed that variation among individuals accounted for 87% of the variation, 9% of the variation was attributed to the differences within individuals while 4% variation was detected among the two populations (Table 5). Wright's F-statistics revealed that the FST was 0.043, showing the low genetic differentiation between the two studied populations since differences between these populations contributed 4.3% of the total variation. However, the inbreeding coefficient (FIS) of 0.909 is high, showing development of inbreeding or genetic similarity within the individuals. Moreover, the overall FIT value was 0.913, showing that, 91.3% of the variation occurs within individuals. The results showed that though a majority of the variation lies within individuals, minor but measurable differentiation exists between the populations.

Table 5.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on 29 SSR markers studied in the genus Crotalaria.

Source Df SS MS Est. var. %
Among Pops 1 22.098 22.098 0.312 4
Among Indiv 29 383.886 13.237 6.304 87
Within Indiv 31 19.500 0.629 0.629 9
Total 61 425.484 7.245 100

Note: % = percent variation.

Abbreviations: df = degree of freedom, Est. var = estimated variance, SS = sum of squares.

3.4. Analysis of Genetic Diversity

The unpaired group method of arithmetic averages (UPGMAs)-based dendrogram grouped the 31 Crotalaria accessions into five major clusters designated A, B, C, D and E (Figure 2). Cluster A has two subclusters. The first cluster contains accessions C. trichotoma Bojer (Fmg 239) and C. lanceolate E.Mey (Fmk 267), while the second subcluster consists of C. incana L. (GBK-5477) and C. intermedia Kotschy (GBK-5244). Cluster B has three subclusters; the first subcluster has only one accession, that is, C. ochroleuca G. Don (Fmg 233), while the second subcluster has accession C. intermedia (GBK-5230). The third subcluster has two accessions, C. anagyroides Kunth (GBK-5470) and C. recta Steud. Ex A. Rich (GBK-5262). Cluster C consists of three subclusters. The first subcluster consists of two accessions: C. ochroleuca (Fsy 59) and C. deserticola Taub. Ex Baker f. (Fmg 299). The second subcluster consists of C. laburnifolia L (GBK-5189), while the third subcluster has two accessions: C. spp (Fmg 301) and C. intermedia (GBK-5231). Cluster D comprises four subclusters. The first subcluster has C. spectabilis Roth (GBK-5685), the second one has accession C. paulina Schrank (GBK-5209), the third has C. juncea L. (GBK-5199), and the fourth one consists of C. pancira (GBK-5201) and C. pallida Aiton (GBK-5200). Cluster E has 2 subclusters. The first subcluster contains C. brevidens Benth var brevidens (Fhb 217), C. brevidens var brevidens (Fvh 0002), C. trichotoma (Fsy 216), C. trichotoma (Fhb207), (Fvh 001), C. trichotoma (Fvh 0150), C. ttrichotoma (vh 0121), C. ochroleuca (Fkk 0091), and C. grahamiana Wight & Arn (Fbs 0041). The other subcluster comprises C. retusa L. (GBK-005670), C. scassellati Chiov (GBK-047581), C. greenwayi Baker f. (GBK-005664), and C. endecaphyla (GBK-005479).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of the 31 Crotalaria accessions differentiated by 29 SSR markers using the neighbor-joining method. N-J tree included five major clusters. A (four accessions), B (four accessions), C (five accessions), D (5 accessions), and E (13 accessions). Red indicates domesticated varieties, while green indicates wild varieties.

Based on the clustering, domesticated accessions were in similar groups, while wild accessions were generally in a different group. This shows that the domesticated varieties were closer to each other than the wild population and are more related genotypically. Domesticated accessions FSY- 0059, 239, and 233 displayed similar groupings to the wild accessions, unlike the other domesticated accessions. The PCoA (Figure 3.) shows that all accessions were distributed across the plot, with 55.27% of the total variation explained in the first five coordinates.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Principal coordinate analysis of 31 Crotalaria accessions using 29 SSR markers used to determine variation. All five coordinates have positive eigenvectors. The first two coordinates contributed to 18.13% and 11.98% in variation, respectively. Red represents domesticated accessions while green represents the wild accessions.

4. Discussion

4.1. Optimization of the SSR Markers

The annealing temperature is a crucial element that should be optimized in the PCR reaction and is determined from the denaturing temperature (Tm). The calculation is done using various formulas, and the simplest formula is the Wallace–Ikatura rule [21].

Tm=2A+T+4G+C. (1)

A, T, G, and C are the base number of primers.

Berindean et al. [22] state that the modifications in the dNTP or the free Mg2+ concentration or the depletion of primer are often not considered to significantly affect the Tm. In the process of PCR amplification, the flexibility of the Tm enables optimization of the reaction in the presence of variable quantities of other ingredients (mainly the DNA template). Generally, optimal amplification relies on various factors, such as the concentration of the reagents in the buffer and the temperature profile. Optimal amplification relies on various factors, such as the concentration of the reagents in the buffer and the temperature profile. The most straightforward approach to optimizing a PCR with a specific primer pair is to modify the annealing temperature or the MgCl2 concentration [22]. SSR markers often show varying amplification efficiencies in PCR, making optimization crucial [23]. For uniform amplification of every SSR, extensive optimization is necessary. In this study, 2 mM MgCl2 was the most effective concentration for the tested primers, showing that it is the optimal concentration for the SSR markers studied in the genus Crotalaria. The concentration of 2 mM Mg2+ is within the recommended range of 1–4 mM [20]. MgCl2 is a significant cofactor for the DNA polymerase enzyme in PCR, and optimization of its concentration is necessary for every primer template system. Several components of the reaction bind magnesium ion including dNTPs, PCR products, templates, and primer. The Mg2+ bind tightly to the phosphate sugar backbone of nucleic acids and nucleotides, and differences in the concentration of MgCl2 has strong impacts on the interactions of nucleic acids. Differences in MgCl2 concentration below 4 mM enhance PCR performance by influencing specificity [23]. For instance, higher concentration leads to lower specificity while lower concentrations increase specificity.

The combination of different dNTPs and MgCl2 concentrations showed that 2.5 mM of dNTPs worked best with 2 mM MgCl2. The concentration of Taq polymerase was not optimized in this study but was maintained at the manufacturer's recommended quantity of 0.125 μL (New England Biolab). The reaction mixture was cycled several times under different temperature conditions for denaturation, annealing, and DNA synthesis. Longer durations for annealing and higher temperatures enhanced the amplification efficiency of the SSR markers. The results indicated that 30–35 cycles are adequate for a PCR reaction, suggesting that to adequately amplify the target amplicons, broad optimization is needed for the SSR PCR. This observation concurs with the results of the study conducted by Ashkani et al. [23] who reported that 30 to 35 cycles were appropriate and adequate for a good PCR reaction. Optimization was necessary to avoid shuttering, a problem of nonamplification [24]. Magnesium ions are crucial for the enzymatic activity of Taq polymerase. The interspecific binding is able to give the enzyme its catalytic activity or particular structure. Magnesium ions are crucial in the PCR amplification process as they influence the specificity and fidelity of any PCR reaction. The importance of Mg2+ in the PCR reaction depends on its concentration due to its role during the process of primer binding. Low magnesium ion concentrations may contribute to a lack of reaction due to inadequate functioning of the DNA polymerase. It may also prevent the annealing process from taking place. On the other hand, high concentrations of magnesium may render the enzyme over-reactive, resulting in nonspecific unwanted amplicons that can be detected during gel electrophoresis [23].

In the present study, the quantity of DNA strongly affected the PCR results. When 1.5 μL DNA was used, no amplification was observed. The volume of the DNA template cannot be too high as the reaction may obtain nonspecific products. Past studies have also indicated that in practice, PCR for SSR markers may fail due to several reasons. The reasons reflect several factors that could affect the amplification, including varied brands/types of thermocyclers, the reaction components (dNTPs, template DNA, concentration of the MgCl2, and Taq polymerase, among others), or even small variations in the thickness of the walls of the reaction tubes [23, 25]. Although the standard guidelines were followed during primer design, more optimization experiments involved adjusting primer length and melting temperature might have increased the amplification efficiency and specificity of the current set of primers under study. Furthermore, evaluating alternative primer sets targeting different SSRs could have yielded more successful primer sets. As such, future studies could employ in silico tools to systematically compare candidate primers based on these parameters.

The concentration of MgCl2 affects the success of the PCR reaction. Increasing the concentration of MgCl2 improves Taq activity to an optimum above which the Mg2+ might function as an inhibitor of Taq activity. The optimum concentration of MgCl2 ranges from 1.0 to 2.5 mM. As PCR substrates, dNTP content directly impacts the results of the amplification. Excess dNTP competes with the Taq binding to the magnesium ions, thus hindering the reaction. The quantity of Taq polymerase affects the efficiency of the amplification. When excess amounts of Taq are used, the enzyme will produce a high mismatch rate, while low amounts affect its effectiveness and primer binding [23]. Even though the primer concentration is not as crucial for the reaction as the other parameters, its optimization is economically significant to prevent unnecessary wastage. Different optimal concentrations of the reverse and forward primers of various markers have been previously reported. Generally, the concentration of the primer's ranges from 1 to 5.0 mM. Variations in the DNA sequence loci could also result in differences in the effectiveness of primer binding [23, 25]. Thus, it is vital to optimize the concentrations of the primers in order to obtain quantity products. Therefore, the obtained results from the present study propose that the concentration of all PCR components must be optimal for an effective amplification.

4.2. Selection and Characterization of SSR Markers in the Genus Crotalaria

A total of 39 pairs of SSR primers were developed to genotype 31 accessions of Crotalaria in the present study. Out of 39 SSR primers, 74% (29 SSR markers) successfully amplified target bands while the other 26% (10 SSR markers) did not amplify any fragments. The current study is the first study to optimize and validate SSR markers for the assessment of genetic diversity in the genus Crotalaria. Other studies have assessed the genetic diversity of Crotalaria using other molecular markers. Using the start codon targeted (SCoT) markers, Satya et al. [6] assessed the genetic diversity of 93 accessions representing seven different accessions.

The primers that produced bands with undesired sizes could bind to other parts of the genome rather than the expected sites and thereby amplify nontarget products [26]. The nonspecific binding sites of the primers are the key sources contributing to nonspecific amplifications. Cross homology in the DNA may reduce the production of the desired amplicon [27]. The failed amplification of the seven SSR markers may be possibly due to the fact that the primers were developed across large introns or splice sites [15, 28]. The outcome suggests that the primers had either sequence exon–exon junctions or were established from an incorrectly assembled transcript [29, 30]. The most abundant repeats in the present study were trinucleotide repeats, which is comparable to other studies that assessed other plants such as cereal, grape, and wheat [31, 32]. The trinucleotide ACA was the most frequently observed repeated trinucleotide in the current study. The abundance of varied motif repeats has been reported to show variable and irregular distribution in different plants. The observation that trinucleotide ACA was most frequent is unlike other studies that reported that GAA is the most abundant SSR in dicots [30].

4.3. Validation of the Optimized SSR Markers for Genetic Diversity Assessment in Crotalaria

The genetic diversity indices and allelic pattern in this study offer insight into genetic diversity within each of the two study populations. The wild population had a slightly higher He than the domesticated population. As a result, the wild population was more diverse compared to the domesticated population as He depends on both the richness (number) of alleles and the evenness (abundance) of the alleles present in a population Dagnon et al. [14]. Understanding genetic diversity with the Crotalaria populations offers insight and information that is crucial in monitoring and maintaining genetic diversity, which is requisite for a strong breeding program.

The development of SSR markers is a critical step in identifying genetic variation and enhancing breeding efforts in Crotalaria accessions. The current study lays the foundation for additional studies on genetic variation, population dynamics as well as breeding activities in the genus Crotalaria and other related genera. The study further sheds light on the genetic variation and breeding potential of Crotalaria accessions. The mean FST of 0.201 shows a high genetic differentiation within the studied Crotalaria accessions based on the Wright [33] who defined the genetic differentiation as Fst<0.05 as low, 0.05 < Fst < 0.15 as moderate and 0.15 < Fst < 0.05 as high and Fst t > 0.25 as very high. The Ho (0.083) shown by the present study is lower than the He (0.119) (Table S1). This information shows that there is a deficit of heterozygotes in the study populations. Generally, deficiency in heterozygotes indicates inbreeding, since inbreeding increases the number of homozygotes at the expense of heterozygotes. Lower level of heterozygosity enables the populations to adapt to their environments through different processes such as the removal of deleterious burdens and the alterations in gene expressions [34] Comparable results were obtained by Dagnon et al. [14], who assessed the genetic diversity and population structure of cowpeas using SSR markers. In their study, the authors reported an average Ho of 0.073. The deficit of heterozygotes observed in the present study could be a result of a moderate value of the inbreeding coefficient (FIS = 0.275). Shortage in heterozygotes in the population indicates that the population contains fewer heterozygous individuals than expected in a population at Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Besides, these observations could be a result of selection pressure, which might have reduced the polymorphism level in the Crotalaria study population. The inbreeding coefficient obtained in the present study is high (0.909). It ranges between 0.746 and 0.988 recorded by Seo et al. [35] and Fatokun et al. [36] who examined genetic diversity in cowpea accessions. The F-statistics analysis revealed that the major feature of the genetic structure in the two populations is a high degree of genetic similarity among individuals, represented by the high inbreeding coefficient. Such a high level of inbreeding can be a consequence of restricted gene flow or isolated mating within each population. Although genetic differentiation among populations is low, as expressed by the Fst value, the presence of measurable differences suggests that evolutionary processes like drift or selection still account for some population-specific genetic variation [14]. The balance between low differentiation between the populations and high variation among individuals may have implications for long-term adaptability and the potential response to environmental change in these populations. While there is a general genetic similarity, other smaller genetic differences may become magnified under different selective pressure, resulting in further divergence.

The PIC values and He (also referred to as gene diversity) values are both measures of genetic diversity among genotypes in the breeding populations, which highlights the evolutionary pressures on the alleles and the rates of mutation that a locus might have encountered over time [37]. The PIC values are an indication of the significance of SSR markers for linkage analysis when analyzing the inheritance between the offspring and the parental genotypes. The He (or gene diversity [GD]) shows gene diversity for haploid markers and offers an estimate of the genetic distance and mean heterozygosity among accessions in a population [37].

The GD of a locus, also referred to as He, is a key quantity of genetic diversity in a population and outlines the expected percentage of heterozygous genotypes within a population at Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium [38]. The overall He value in the present study was marginally higher than the PIC value, which was expected given that PIC values are always lower than He and converge towards He as allele counts increase and allele frequencies become more evenly distributed (where it is less probable that individuals have the same heterozygote genotypes). In a previous study, markers having PIC values ≥ 0.5 were described as highly informative. In contrast, those having PIC values ranging from 0.25 to 0.5 were considered to be moderately informative and those PIC < 0.25 as slightly informative [39]. In the current study, the PIC values ranged from 0.062 to 0.397, with a mean of 0.195 among the SSR markers designed to assess drought resistance. These markers could be considered to be slightly informative. For the markers designed for phosphorus mobilization, the PIC ranged from 0.053 to 0.605 with a mean of 0.263, hence could be considered as moderately informative. The grand average value for the PIC values was 0.233, which generally shows that the studied SSR markers were slightly informative in assessing the genetic diversity of the genus Crotalaria. The values obtained were less than the values obtained from previous studies, which reported PIC of 0.45, 0.44, and 0.58 [11, 14, 40]. The PIC is one of the most significant indicators used for the comparison of various markers of differentiation [40]. High PIC values denote a rare allele at an indicator location or high polymorphism, which plays a significant role in the differentiation of accessions. Markers that have high PIC, for instance in the present study the marker PC004 with a PIC value of 0.605, can be utilized to differentiate Crotalaria accessions. The frequency and N affect the values of the PIC, which is a significant indicator of marker polymorphism.

The AMOVA results revealed 87% variation among individuals within regions of the total variation, while 9% of the difference was attributed to the differences within the populations. This was unlike the study by Satya et al. [6] that revealed significant variability of 24% between the accessions and 76% within the accessions. The present study focused on intraspecific genetic differentiation within populations. Satya et al. [6] investigated both within-species and between-species genetic variance, providing a more comprehensive understanding of Crotalaria accessions genetic variety and differentiation. Data obtained from the analysis of the molecular variance show that there is substantial genetic diversity both within and between the populations, with some evidence of inbreeding within populations and genetic differentiation between populations. Thus, the optimized SSR markers can be applied in the genetic diversity assessment of the genus Crotalaria and other related genera within the family Fabaceae. The obtained results indicated that intrapopulation diversity was lower than interpopulation diversity. The low Fst value (0.043) showed a low genetic variation between the studied populations. The overall fixation and the inbreeding coefficient were 0.913 and 0.909, respectively, across the SSR loci.

4.4. Genetic Relationship and Population Structure

The study population was divided into two major groups based on their domestication status. The UPGMA dendrogram generated divided the studied Crotalaria accession into five main clusters. The groups were further subdivided into different subgroups. This clustering shows that the optimized PCR conditions for the SSR markers were successful in discriminating the 31 Crotalaria accessions that were evaluated. Therefore, the germplasm could be used as a valuable source for selecting diverse parents for a breeding program aimed at developing new cultivars with different traits of interest.

Selecting and creating plant cultivars with desired characteristics is a common step in the domestication process. This in turn reduces the genetic diversity compared with wild counterparts. Genetic divergence and local adaptations result from natural selection in several settings. Geographic isolation increases genetic distinctiveness by further limiting gene flow between groups. The high genetic distinctiveness observed might also be attributed to significant changes in allele frequencies over time brought about by genetic drift in small, isolated wild populations. Despite them belonging to different accessions, breeders can take advantage of their traits to improve domesticated varieties during breeding programs. Phenotypically, the varieties in the fifth subcluster were different. However, from the genotypic analysis, they seem to be closely related, hence can be improved genetically. The PCoA results showed that the Crotalaria accessions could be grouped into four clusters and this concurred with the results of the neighbor-joining tree analysis.

Like many plants, Crotalaria accessions are mostly identified using their common names and their morphological features such as pod shape, flower morphology, seed size, and color as well as leaf structure. However, there are drawbacks to morphological characterization, including limited variability between accessions due to the limited genetic base of the germplasm used, the influence of the environment on the expression of the characters, and the length of time required to obtain results [41]. Besides, this nomenclature can result in the redundancy of some accessions in the germplasm collection. Most studies have determined that SSRs are appropriate markers for assessing genetic diversity, Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) studies and the population structure of most plants in the family Fabaceae. For instance, Dagnon et al. [14] successfully assessed the genetic diversity of cowpeas using SSR markers.

5. Conclusion

The present study reports the first successful optimization and validation of SSR markers for the assessment of genetic diversity in Crotalaria. Twenty nine out of the 39 optimized primers were successful. The current study provides crucial information on the ability of these markers to discriminate Crotalaria accessions as well as other members in the family Fabaceae. The SSR markers employed in this study were found to be slightly informative. The SSR marker PC004 detected the largest N despite being a hexanucleotide motif repeat. Its uniqueness makes it a noteworthy marker, which augments its use in the assessment of genetic diversity. By leveraging this marker, researchers can develop insight into the evolutionary mechanism and genetic patterns that shape biological diversity across various populations and species. These primers will be useful in the analysis and assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of the genus Crotalaria, screening of the germplasm and selection.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the International Foundation for Science for funding the project and ensuring it was achieved as per the proposed objectives. We also acknowledge every individual who offered any valuable suggestions and comments and are not listed as authors.

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included within the article and its Additional files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Nancy L. M. Budambula and Joshua Kiilu Muli: conceptualization.

Phenny Sharon Odhoch: data curation and drafting the original draft.

Phenny Sharon Odhoch and Felix Kiprotich: data analysis.

Nancy L. M. Budambula and Joshua Kiilu Muli: funding acquisition and draft review and editing.

Phenny Sharon Odhoch and Joshua Kiilu Muli: investigation and methodology.

Phenny Sharon Odhoch, Nancy L. M. Budambula, Felix Kiprotich, and Joshua Kiilu Muli: approval of the final draft.

Funding

This work was funded by the International Foundation for Science (Grant number I3-C-6566-1).

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.

2409286.f1.xlsx (12.6KB, xlsx)

Table S1: Genetic analysis information carried out using GeneAlex Software (v 6.5) showing N, Ne, information index (I), Ho, He, and unbiased heterozygosity (uHe).

References

  • 1.Mosjidis J. A., Wang M. L. Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. Crotalaria; pp. 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.le Roux M. M., Boatwright J. S., Van Wyk B. A Global Infrageneric Classification System for the Genus Crotalaria (Leguminosae) Based on Molecular and Morphological Evidence. Taxon . 2013;62(5):957–971. doi: 10.12705/625.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berriel V., Monza J., Perdomo C. H. Cover Crop Selection by Jointly Optimizing Biomass Productivity, Biological Nitrogen Fixation, and Transpiration Efficiency: Application to Two Crotalaria Species. Agronomy . 2020;10(8):p. 1116. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rouamba A., Ouédraogo V., Karama I., Compaoré M., Kiendrebéogo M. Ethno-Medicinal Use of Crotalaria retusa L. (Fabaceae), A Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Toxic Plant. International Journal of Biochemistry Research & Review . 2018;23(2):1–6. doi: 10.9734/ijbcrr/2018/43635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mahasawat P., Boukaew S., Prasertsan P. Exploring the Potential of Crotalaria Juncea Flower Extracts as a Source of Antioxidants, Antimicrobials, and Cytoprotective Agents for Biomedical Applications. BioTechnologia (Poznań) . 2023;104(4):359–370. doi: 10.5114/bta.2023.132772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Satya P., Banerjee R., Karan M., et al. Insight Into Genetic Relation and Diversity of Cultivated and Semi-Domesticated Under-Utilized Crotalaria Species Gained Using Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) Markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology . 2016;66:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2016.02.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rohmawati I., Nursusilawati P., Abdullah S. Genetic Diversity of Some Indonesian Local Rice Varieties based on Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Madecrker Related to Aromatic Genes. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science . 2021;715(1):p. 012046. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Muli J. K., Neondo J. O., Odari E., Kuria P., Budambula N. L. Phenomic Characterization of Crotalaria Germplasm for Crop Improvement in Kenya. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience . 2020;2(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang L., Guan Y., Guan R., et al. Establishment of Chinese Soybean Glycine Max Core Collections With Agronomic Traits and SSR Markers. Euphytica (Wageningen) . 2006;151(2):215–223. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9142-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rather S. A., Subramaniam S., Danda S., Pandey A. K. Discovery of Two New Species of Crotalaria (Leguminosae, Crotalarieae) From Western Ghats, India. PLoS One . 2018;13(2):p. e0192226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rani R., Raza G., Tung M. H., et al. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis in Cultivated Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) Using SSR and EST-SSR Markers. PLoS One . 2023;18(5):p. e0286099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Feng S., He R., Lu J., et al. Development of SSR Markers and Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium Cultivars. Frontiers in Genetics . 2016;7:p. 1113. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ali A., Pan Y. B., Wang Q. N., Wang J. D., Chen J. L., Gao S. J. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis of Saccharum and Erianthus Genera Using Microsatellite (SSR) Markers. Scientific Reports . 2019;9(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36630-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dagnon Y. D., Palanga K. K., Bammite D., et al. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] Accessions From Togo Using SSR Markers. PLoS One . 2022;17(10):p. e0252362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li X., Qiao L., Chen B., et al. SSR Markers Development and Their Application in Genetic Diversity Evaluation of Garlic (Allium sativum) Germplasm. Plant Diversity . 2022;44(5):481–491. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2021.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang M., Li R., Wan-Ming Y., Weijun D. Assessing the Genetic Diversity of Cultivars and Wild Soybeans Using SSR Markers. African Journal of Biotechnology . 2010;9(31):4857–4866. doi: 10.5897/ajb09.1410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Muli J. K., Neondo J. O., Kamau P. K., Michuki G., Odari E. O., Budambula N. L. M. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Wild and Cultivated Crotalaria Species Based on Genotyping-by-Sequencing. PLoS One . 2022;17(9):p. e0272955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Muli J. K. Genetic Diversity and Differential Gene Expression in Crotalaria Species From Selected Counties in Kenya . Doctoral Dissertation, University of Embu; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Untergasser A., Cutcutache I., Koressaar T., et al. Primer 3-New Capabilities and Interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research . 2012;40(15):1155–e212. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schenk J. J., Becklund L. E., Carey S. J., Fabre P. P. What is the “Modified” CTAB Protocol? Characterizing Modifications to the CTAB DNA Extraction Protocol. Applications in Plant Sciences . 2023;11(3):p. e11517. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kamel A. A. Bioinformatic Tools and Guideline for PCR Primer Design. African Journal of Biotechnology . 2003;2(5):91–95. doi: 10.5897/ajb2003.000-1019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berindean I. V., Tämaș E., Cardei E., Pamfil D. Optimization of PCR Conditions to Amplify SSR Markers in Sweet Cherry Cultivars. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca-Agriculture . 2013;70(1):201–207. doi: 10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:9786. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ashkani S., Rafii M. Y., Shabanimofrad M., et al. Multiplex SSR–PCR Approaches for Semi-Automated Genotyping and Characterization of Loci Linked to Blast Disease Resistance Genes in Rice. Comptes Rendus Biologies . 2015;338(11):709–722. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khamassi K., Khoufi S., Chaabane R., Da Silva J. T., Naceur M. Optimization of Conditions for Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Using SSR Markers. International Journal of Plant Breeding . 2011;5(2):141–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dograr N., Akkaya M. S. Optimization of PCR Amplification of Wheat Simple Sequence Repeat DNA Markers. Turkish Journal of Biology . 2001;25(2):153–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Qu W., Zhang C. Selecting Specific PCR Primers With MFEprimer. Methods in Molecular Biology . 2015;1275:201–213. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2365-6_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Asif S., Khan M., Waqar Arshad M., Shabbir M. I. PCR Optimization for Beginners: A Step by Step Guide. Research in Molecular Medicine . 2021;9(2):81–102. doi: 10.32598/rmm.9.2.1189.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu S., Li W., Long D., Hu C., Zhang J. Development and Characterization of Genomic and Expressed SSRs in Citrus by Genome-Wide Analysis. PLoS ONE . 2013;8(10):p. e75149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vidya V., Prasath D., Snigdha M., Gobu R., Sona C., Maiti C. S. Development of EST-SSR Markers Based on Transcriptome and its Validation in Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Rosc.) PLoS One . 2021;16(10):p. e0259146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gong Y., Xu S., Mao W., et al. Developing New SSR Markers From ESTs of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B . 2010;11(9):702–707. doi: 10.1631/jzus.b1000004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gupta P. K., Rustgi S., Sharma S., Singh R., Kumar N., Balyan H. S. Transferable EST-SSR Markers for the Study of Polymorphism and Genetic Diversity in Bread Wheat. Molecular Genetics and Genomics . 2003;270(4):315–323. doi: 10.1007/s00438-003-0921-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cardle L., Ramsay L., Milbourne D., Macaulay M., Marshall D., Waugh R. Computational and Experimental Characterization of Physically Clustered Simple Sequence Repeats in Plants. Genetics (Austin, Tex.) . 2000;156(2):847–854. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.2.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wright S. Variability Within and Among Natural Populations . Vol. 4. Chicago, United States: The University of Chicago Press; 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. A Treatise in Four Volumes. https://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19780137995.html . [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li P., Xiao L., Du Q., et al. Genomic Insights Into Selection for Heterozygous Alleles and Woody Traits in Populus Tomentosa. Plant Biotechnology Journal . 2023;21(10):2002–2018. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Seo E., Kim K., Jun T., et al. Population Structure and Genetic Diversity in Korean Cowpea Germplasm Based on SNP Markers. Plants . 2020;9(9):p. 1190. doi: 10.3390/plants9091190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fatokun C., Girma G., Abberton M., et al. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of a Mini-Core Subset From the World Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Germplasm Collection. Scientific Reports . 2018;8(1):p. 16035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34555-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Salem K. F. M., Sallam A. Analysis of Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Egyptian and Exotic Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes. Comptes Rendus Biologies . 2015;339(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nei M. Analysis of Gene Diversity in Subdivided Populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 1973;70(12):3321–3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Luo Z., Brock J., Dyer J. M., et al. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of a Camelina sativa Spring Panel. Frontiers in Plant Science . 2019;10:p. 184. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mafakheri K., Bihamta M. R., Abbasi A. R. Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Germplasm Using Morphological and Molecular Characterisation. Cogent Food & Agriculture . 2017;3(1):p. 1327092. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2017.1327092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Singh C., Kumar S. J., Kv S. Characterization and Identification of Rice Germplasm Accessions Using Chemical Tests. 2017.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.

2409286.f1.xlsx (12.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included within the article and its Additional files.


Articles from Scientifica are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES