Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 24;2005(1):CD001351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001351.pub2

6.5. Analysis.

Comparison 6 acupuncture versus other intervention. (Chronic LBP: > 3 months), Outcome 5 pain and function (adjusted for baseline values).

pain and function (adjusted for baseline values)
Study Comparison Outcome measure Timing p value
Immediately after the end of the sessions
Tsukayama 2002 Acupuncture versus TENS Functional status (JOA): higher scores are better Immediately after 0.24
Tsukayama 2002        
Short‐term follow‐up (up to 3 months after the end of the sessions)
Cherkin 2001 (mass) Acupuncture versus massage Pain 9 weeks 0.23
Cherkin 2001 (mass)   Function 9 weeks 0.01 (massage is better)
Cherkin 2001 (sc) Acupuncture versus self‐care education Pain 9 weeks 0.55
Cherkin 2001 (sc)   Function 9 weeks 0.75
Intermediate‐term follow‐up (3 months to 1 year)
Cherkin 2001 (mass) Acupuncture versus massage Pain 52 weeks 0.002 (massage is better)
Cherkin 2001 (mass)   Function 52 weeks 0.05 (massage is better)
Cherkin 2001 (sc) Acupuncture versus self‐care education Pain 52 weeks 0.10
Cherkin 2001 (sc)   Function 52 weeks 0.10