Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 24;2005(1):CD001351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001351.pub2

Comparison 11. acupuncture versus acupuncture. (unknown / mixed duration of low back pain).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 pain (lower values are better) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Short term (immediately after end of sessions) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 pain recovery (higher values are better) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Immediately after the end of the sessions 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 global measure (higher values are better) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 Short‐term follow‐up (up to 3 months after the end of the sessions) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 functional status (higher values are better) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 Immediately after the end of the sessions 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 physical examination (finger‐floor distance) Higher values are better. 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.1 Immediately after the end of the sessions 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 improvement     Other data No numeric data
6.1 Long‐term follow‐up (more than 1 year)     Other data No numeric data