Table 3.
Comparison of Outcome Variables in Study Cohort
| Variables | Control Group (n = 87) | LF Group (n = 83) | HF Group (n = 83) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoxemia (< 95% for >5 s) | 24 (27.6) | 6 (7.2) | 1 (1.2) | < 0.001* |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.000 | 0.184 (0.067 to 0.503) | — | 0.001† |
| 1.000 | — | 0.026 (0.003 to 0.207) | < 0.001† | |
| — | 1.000 | 0.143 (0.017 to 1.245) | 0.078† | |
| Hypoxemia (<95% for > 5 s), PP | 24 (27.9) | 6 (7.2) | 1 (1.2) | < 0.001* |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.000 | 0.182 (0.067 to 0.499) | — | < 0.001† |
| 1.000 | — | 0.027 (0.004 to 0.216) | < 0.001† | |
| — | 1.000 | 0.151 (0.017 to 1.307) | 0.086† | |
| Hypoxemia (<90% for > 5 s) | 4 (4.6) | 2 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.171‡ |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.000 | 0.571 (0.096 to 2.674) | — | 0.479† |
| 1.000 | — | 0.110 (0.001 to 1.067) | 0.058† | |
| Minimum Spo2 (%) | 94.1 ± 6.2 | 98.9 ± 2.6 | 99.3 ± 1.2 | < 0.001§ |
| Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) | Ref. | 4.802 (3.589 to 6.015) | — | < 0.001∥ |
| Ref. | — | 5.143 (3.931 to 6.355) | < 0.001∥ | |
| — | Ref. | 0.341 (–0.885 to 1.568) | 0.584∥ | |
| Mean ETco2 (mmHg) | 35.2 ± 6.41 | 34.2 ± 6.03 | 21.57 ± 12.31 | < 0.001§ |
| Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) | Ref. | –0.771 (–3.032 to 1.490) | — | 0.502∥ |
| Ref. | –13.395 (–15.755 to –11.035) | < 0.001∥ | ||
| Ref. | –12.624 (–15.002 to –10.246) | < 0.001∥ | ||
| Mean tCO2 | 39.9 ± 4.21 | 39.63 ± 4.39 | 39.34 ± 4.55 | 0.528§ |
| Patients with rescue intervention | 46 (52.9) | 9 (10.8) | 3 (3.6) | < 0.001* |
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.000 | 0.101 (0.044 to 0.232) | — | < 0.001† |
| 1.000 | — | 0.030 (0.009 to 0.104) | < 0.001† | |
| — | 1.000 | 0.297 (0.077 to 1.147) | 0.078† | |
| Oxygen supplementation/increasing oxygen flow rate or Fio2 | 45 (51.7) | 4 (4.8) | 1 (1.2) | < 0.001* |
| Jaw thrust/head extension | 12 (13.8) | 7 (8.4) | 1 (1.2) | 0.009* |
| oral/nasal airway | 0 | 1 (1.2) | 0 | 0.358* |
| Assisted ventilation | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 0 | 0.384* |
| Reducing drug dose | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.2) | 0.358* |
Data are presented as mean ± SD and n (%).
Chi-square test; †Logistic regression analysis; ‡Fisher exact test; §Kruskal-Wallis test; ∥Linear regression analysis.
ETco2, end-tidal carbon dioxide; HF, high flow; LF, low flow; PP, per-protocol; tCO2, transcutaneous CO2.