Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 1;19:1884. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1884

Supplementary Table 4. Proportional hazards.

Study Population Outcome Treat. Effects HR PH schoenfeld residuals test p-value RMST difference
RUBY DMMR OS 0.34
(0.18–0.66)
0.2102
RUBY PMMR OS 0.78
(0.59–1.03)
0.8534
RUBY DMMR PFS 0.33
(0.19–0.56)
0.0240 10.618
(6.194–15.043)
RUBY PMMR PFS 0.76
(0.59–0.98)
0.7479
NGR DMMR PFS 0.30
(0.19–0.48)
0.6850
NGR PMMR PFS 0.56
(0.43–0.73)
0.3477
NGR DMMR OS 0.58
(0.26–1.29)
0.7602
NGR PMMR OS 0.78
(0.53–1.15)
0.4321
MITO PMMR PFS 1.18
(0.67–2.07)
0.5684
MITO DMMR PFS 0.39
(0.19–0.78)
0.6772
MITO PMMR OS 0.54
(0.23–1.29)
0.0412 4.549
(−2.564–11.662)
MITO DMMR OS 0.36
(0.13–1.02)
0.5480
DUOE DMMR PFS 0.43
(0.22–0.82)
0.8668
DUOE PMMR PFS 0.79
(0.62–1.00)
0.0173 2.097
(0.279–3.916)
DUOE DMMR OS 0.34
(0.14–0.81)
0.7513
DUOE PMMR OS 0.92
(0.64–1.31)
0.7995
ATTEND DMMR PFS 0.37
(0.23–0.59)
0.4594
ATTEND PMMR PFS 0.92
(0.73–1.16)
0.1418
ATTEND DMMR OS 0.41
(0.21–0.79)
0.4010
ATTEND PMMR OS 1.00
(0.74–1.35)
0.1127

Bold values: p < 0.05