Abstract
Marine and salt marsh sediments contain large amounts of organic carbon (OC) and are therefore important in the global carbon cycle. Here, we collated previously published and unpublished measurements of sediment OC in marine and salt marsh sediments in European regional seas (EURO-CARBON; available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14905489). To the extent possible the OC data were complemented by variables such as sediment porosity and dry bulk density. The EURO-CARBON dataset holds 61306 individual data entries of sediment OC content from different regions of European regional seas. Around three quarters (76%) were collected in coastal and deep sea bare sediments, 18% from salt marshes, 7% from seagrass habitats, and 0.03% from macroalgal habitats. For all habitats and sediment depth layers the OC content varied between <0.1 and 41.56 % (avg.: 2.47 ± 3.37 %; median: 1.39 %), with the content generally decreasing in the following sequence: salt marsh (5.01 ± 5.96 %; 3.03 %) > seagrass (2.37 ± 5.96 %; 3.03 %) > bare sediment (1.88 ± 2.03 %; 1.20 %). The EURO-CARBON dataset will serve as a basis for future work, and it will be an important resource for researchers, managers, and policymakers working towards protecting sediment OC pools.
Keywords: Sediment organic carbon, Blue carbon, Marine sediments, Salt marsh, Seagrass
Specifications Table
| Subject | Earth & Environmental Sciences |
| Specific subject area | Marine and salt marsh sediments contain large amounts of organic carbon (OC) and are therefore important in the global carbon cycle. Here, we collated previously published and unpublished measurements of sediment OC in marine and salt marsh sediments in European regional seas. |
| Type of data | The data compiled have been deposited in an open-access repository under the following link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14905489. The file can be downloaded as a *.csv merged file. |
| Data collection | Initially the research community was invited through a public call to contribute data to establish a database of OC and related variables in marine sediments. Secondly, data were retrieved from public databases. Thirdly, a detailed search was performed in Google Scholar. Further searches were conducted in the reference lists of the identified studies. Additional studies were included from existing reviews on sediment OC and finally, we included data from MSc or PhD theses, and other published reports based on our knowledge of the research field. |
| Data source location | The data were collected in coastal and deep-sea settings within European Regional Seas, which here includes the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, the North-east Atlantic Ocean, and the Mediterranean Sea. |
| Data accessibility | Repository name: Zenodo open data repository (CERN) Data identification number: doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14905489 Direct URL to data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14905489 |
| Related research article | A subset of the dataset has been used separately in different publications. However, the current dataset is the first time to combine these datasets with unpublished data to provide a more comprehensive database for European Regional seas. |
1. Value of the Data
-
•
The compilation contains sediment organic carbon data collected across European regional seas.
-
•
The dataset is an important resource for researchers, managers, and policymakers working towards protecting sediment organic carbon pools.
-
•
The compilation can be used to assess carbon storage and the sensitivity to anthropogenic pressures.
2. Background
Marine and salt marsh sediments are some of the major organic carbon (OC) reservoirs on the planet and are therefore vital components of the global carbon cycle [1]. Recent estimates suggest that globally the top 5 cm of surface marine sediments alone contain an OC reservoir of around 87,000 ± 43,000 Mt, while in the top 1 m of these sediments the pool may be as large as 2.3 million Mt OC [1]. However, the size and residence time of sedimentary OC stocks vary considerably with geological, physical, chemical, and biological settings and also depend on the temporal and spatial scales under consideration [1]. While the capacity of marine sediments to preserve OC has intrigued biogeochemists for decades [2], it is only more recently that this subject has gained considerable attention within the wider scientific community. This attention has focused around “Blue Carbon” which are all biologically driven carbon fluxes and storage in marine systems that are amenable to management. Blue Carbon research has grown rapidly over the past decade, where the focus has been on quantifying OC stocks, managing and protecting organic carbon-rich habitats and potentially increasing their capacity to capture carbon dioxide and retain OC [3]. However, understanding OC fluxes and preservation processes and providing potential management inputs require reliable data on the location of important habitats, OC content, OC stocks and OC accumulation rates along with site-specific physical and biogeochemical conditions.
Datasets exist especially for OC content but is more limited for OC stocks and accumulation rates. These data can, if compiled and standardized, provide a powerful resource for scientists to deliver new OC distribution maps, perspectives on the distribution pattern and a better understanding of controlling factors over larger spatial and temporal scales. Also, standardized datasets can help identify geographical areas and habitats with limited sampling efforts needing complementary data collection, and also highlight avenues for future research. This data report aims to provide the scientific community with a comprehensive compilation of sediment OC contents, associated sediment variables, and environmental conditions in European regional seas, the EURO-CARBON database. This compilation includes data available in public repositories and scientific papers, but also currently unpublished datasets. In some instances, the EURO-CARBON database also includes above and below ground biomass data for associated vegetated coastal ecosystems such as seagrasses and salt marshes. As per the nature of a data report manuscript, only a preliminary discussion of the included data is presented together with some possible future uses of the dataset.
3. Data Description
The data included in the EURO-CARBON database originate from multiple sources and therefore different research groups have been involved in the sample collection, analysis, and/or collecting associated information. Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of large datasets, such as EURO-CARBON, is critical to ensure that included data are trustworthy and useful. Therefore, we have not included data that were considered of “low-quality”. Nevertheless, a degree of variability within the dataset was accepted given that multiple groups and laboratories were involved in the data compilation.
Obvious errors, such as incorrect geographical coordinates, were corrected, while errors that could not be resolved, such as unrealistically high values, were excluded from the dataset. Prior to excluding suspected erroneous observations, where possible, data originators were directly contacted to seek confirmation of the observations. During these steps, excessively narrow standards, known as “data grooming”, were avoided so potential real patterns could be identified. Given the wide range of environmental conditions in marine sediments, influenced by factors such as local anthropogenic activities, establishing reliable lower and upper limits for sediment OC content is challenging due to their inherent variability. Initially data plots were used to identify potential outliers within the different habitats such as extreme low or high OC contents. Lower limits of OC contents are difficult to establish and in cases where concentrations were below the detection limit (around 0.1%), zero values were replaced with half the value of the limit of detection. Additionally, upper OC contents for surface sediments previously reported in the literature were used. These include those reported in systems such as river deltas including the Fly river delta (up to 2.5%; ([4]), fjords (up to 8.8%; [5]) and sediments dominated by seagrass (up to 19.8%;([6]) or microphytobenthos (up to 13.7%; [7]). In open ocean systems, OC contents up to 2.3% have been reported in the literature in Hadal trenches which are considered “OC hotspots” [8]. In salt marshes levels above 40% OC have been detected in some areas [9].
Overall, the lower and upper limits for OC contents were used in EURO-CARBON as general guiding limits for identifying potential errors in observations. Once identified, potential errors were either corrected by the data originator, or if not possible (e.g., values showing signs of contamination) these were excluded from the database. Similar approaches, using previously published values to identify potential errors, were used for other variables included in EURO-CARBON, for example δ13C, which reflects varying degrees of terrestrial (from −22 ‰ to −30 ‰) and marine (−10 ‰ to −31 ‰) OC sources, can vary substantially [10].
In EURO-CARBON, a total of 61306 data entries for OC content were included, with the following distribution: 76% from bare sediments, 18% from salt marshes, 7% from seagrass habitats, and 0.03% from macroalgal habitats (Table 2). For all sediment depths and habitats, the OC content varied between <0.1 and 41.56 % (mean: 2.46 ± 3.36 %; median: 1.39 %), with the average contents decreasing in the following sequence: salt marsh (5.01 ± 5.96 %; 3.03 %) > seagrass (2.37 ± 5.96 %; 1.11%) > algal habitat (1.98 ± 1.23 %; 2.16 %) > bare sediment (1.88 ± 2.03 %; 1.20 %). In addition, comparing the averages and medians of surface and deeper sediment layers, we found generally higher contents in the surface layers (Table 2).
Table 2.
Descriptive statistics for the sediment percentage organic carbon (%OC) data included in EURO-CARBON. The minimum (Min), maximum (Max), average values (± standard deviation, SD), median, coefficient of variance (CV), variance and number of samples (N) are shown for all and surface only data for all habitats (All habitats), macroalgae (Algae habitat), bare (Bare sediment), seagrass (Seagrass) and salt marsh habitats (Salt marsh). We used the term “salt marsh” broadly to also include e.g. Phragmites australis.
| All habitats | Algae habitat | Organic carbon (in %) |
Salt marsh | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bare sediment | Seagrass | |||||
| Min | All data | < 0.1 | 0.43 | < 0.1 | < 0.1 | < 0.1 |
| Surface only | < 0.1 | - | < 0.1 | < 0.1 | 0.02 | |
| Max | All data | 41.56 | 5.66 | 22.10 | 23.27 | 41.56 |
| Surface only | 39.48 | - | 18.9 | 23.27 | 39.48 | |
| Average ± SD | All data | 2.47 ± 3.37 | 1.98 ± 1.23 | 1.88 ± 2.03 | 2.37 ± 3.06 | 5.01 ± 5.96 |
| Surface only | 2.42 ± 3.20 | - | 2.03 ± 2.11 | 3.01 ± 3.88 | 9.29 ± 7.92 | |
| Median | All data | 1.39 | 2.16 | 1.20 | 1.11 | 3.03 |
| Surface only | 1.46 | - | 1.39 | 1.15 | 6.97 | |
| CV | All data | 1.37 | 0.62 | 1.07 | 1.30 | 1.19 |
| Surface only | 1.32 | - | 1.04 | 1.29 | 0.85 | |
| Variance | All data | 11.38 | 1.50 | 4.11 | 9.37 | 35.50 |
| Surface only | 10.22 | - | 4.46 | 15.07 | 62.73 | |
| N | All data | 61306 | 19 | 46308 | 4233 | 10746 |
| Surface only | 29118 | - | 26392 | 705 | 1480 | |
The dataset showed that within the different habitats, there was a large variation in the %OC content, with the coefficient of variation (CV, i.e., dispersion of the data around the mean) being highest in seagrass sediments followed by saltmarshes and bare sediments (Table 2). The variability in OC content is likely due to differences in local physical and biogeochemical conditions, and different degree of organic enrichment. Also, some studies (such as regions along the Norwegian coast) had a bias towards locations impacted by eutrophication as these sediment samples were collected in connection with recipient surveys (incl. screening for municipal wastewater impacts). This means that these had higher OC-values than at reference coastal locations. A large part (40 %) of the OC content data were below 1 % and these were predominantly collected in bare sediments, while the highest contents were generally found in salt marsh sediments (Fig. 1 and s1).
Fig. 1.
Histogram (a) showing the distribution of all percent organic carbon content (%OC) observations included in the EURO-CARBON database and box plot (b) of %OC in bare, seagrass and salt marsh sediments. Relationships (c, d) between %OC and the % organic matter (org. matter (%)) and dry bulk density (DBD (g cm−3)), respectively, are also shown. The relationship between carbon density (g C cm−3) and %OC are shown both for raw (e) and log transformed (f) values. The lines in the box plot (b) represent median values, the limits of the boxes represent 25-75 percentiles, and the whiskers the data range. Please note that data from macroalgae habitats are not shown in (b) as these data were only collected in one location.
In the EURO-CARBON database, multiple variables besides %OC were included; however, these were not available in all instances (see Table s2 and s3 for summaries). For example, the % organic matter (loss on ignition-LOI) content and dry bulk density (DBD) were measured in 19 % and 30 % of the included observations, respectively (Table s2 and s3). In the EURO-CARBON database, we only included measurements which have directly determined the OC content (e.g. elemental analysers), and excluded OC estimates only obtained, by the LOI technique. We are aware that the significant relationship between %OC and Org. matter (%) (LOI) across habitats (Fig. 1) should be taken with caution as the OM content measured by LOI depend on factors such as the sediment composition (e.g. clay and salt content) [11], carbonate content, ignition time and temperature [12].. Overall, the %OC content declined with the DBD (Fig. 1). Plotting the %OC against OC density showed large variability, while the log-log plot showed a near linear fit, though still with large variability (Fig. 1). In addition, OC accumulation rates were only measured in 1 % (720 estimates) of the included measurements (Table s3). The %OC content of the above- and below-ground biomass of the vegetated habitats included 984 data entries (82% for saltmarsh and 18% for seagrass), while biomass estimates were measured in 693 samples (Table s4).
The data included in EURO-CARBON represent a wide range of locations with different geological, physical and biogeochemical settings (Fig. 2). Observations were unevenly distributed, with northern regions of European regional seas holding a larger share of the observations, especially in open ocean regions (Fig. 2). The Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea were under-sampled compared with the North Sea, Baltic Sea region and Norwegian coastal waters (Fig. 2). Also, generally sediment OC observations were better resolved along the coast than the open ocean, with exception being the coastlines in countries such as Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Croatia, Montenegro and Albania (Fig. 2) and the open ocean is therefore generally poorly resolved.
Fig. 2.
(a) Map showing the spatial distribution of the sediment organic carbon (%OC) data entries included in the EURO-CARBON database. Histograms show the number of %OC observations grouped into bins of 10° latitude (b) and longitude (c) for bare, seagrass and salt marsh sediments. Data from macroalgae habitats were not included in (b) and (c) as these data were collected in one location only.
4. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods
In this compilation effort, we restricted our data search to coastal and deep-sea settings within the European Regional Seas, which here includes the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, the North-east Atlantic Ocean, and the Mediterranean Sea. The sediment data were obtained from three types of sources, i.e., directly from data contributors, from online databases, and from scientific papers and reports to capture as many datasets as possible dealing with sediment OC in European regional seas. In cases of overlap between data received from different databases or from scientific papers, we prioritised the original dataset. Initially, in April 2023, the research community was invited through a public call to contribute data to establish a EURO-CARBON database of OC and related variables in marine sediments (for further details see supplement material). Researchers were encouraged to submit previously published and unpublished data. For this purpose, we created a template that all contributors used. Secondly, OC data were retrieved from databases including marine sediment data (see full list in Table S1). Thirdly, a detailed search was performed in Google Scholar using the search terms “sediment carbon” OR “sediment organic matter” OR “Blue Carbon”, which yielded 17700 entries (April 2023). We then filtered the query by searching for relevant content in the title and abstract, resulting in a total of 1112 potentially relevant studies. Further searches were conducted in the reference lists of the identified studies. Additional studies were included from existing reviews on sediment OC and finally, we included data from MSc or PhD theses, and other published reports based on our knowledge of the research field (see further details in Supplementary Methodology). As our focus was on marine sediments, we did not specifically target salt marsh OC data but where available these were also included in the EURO-CARBON database. In a few instances, above and below-ground living biomass of the sediment-associated habitat (e.g. seagrass) have been included in the EURO-CARBON database. The data included were gathered using various sampling and sorting techniques. However, all samples were dried after collection and thereafter analysed for variables such as OC and TN content and/or stable isotopic ratios using the below-mentioned techniques. The final dataset was derived from data collected, analysed and processed by many laboratories. Key information on sampling sites, methods and analytical techniques were provided along with the data. The list of variables included in the EURO-CARBON sediment and biomass database is shown in Table 1. Please do note that not all variables were available for each data entry.
Table 1.
List of variables included in the EURO-CARBON sediment and biomass database. Variables marked in bold were mandatory.
| Variables included in EURO-CARBON | |
|---|---|
| Sediment database | Biomass database |
| • Habitat | • Habitat |
| • Sample ID | • Location name |
| • Location name, Station ID, Core ID | • Station ID |
| • Year of sampling | • Sample ID |
| • Month of sampling | • Year of sampling |
| • Day of sampling | • Month of sampling |
| • Latitude of sampling location (decimal degrees, WGS84) | • Day of sampling |
| • Longitude of sampling location (decimal degrees, WGS84) | • Latitude of sampling location (decimal degrees, WGS84) |
| • Water depth (m) at which sediment core was obtained | • Longitude of sampling location (decimal degrees, WGS84) |
| • Water temperature (°C) | • Water depth (m) at which sample was obtained |
| • Salinity | • Temperature (°C) |
| • Depth interval of sample when compacted (cm) | • Salinity |
| • Depth interval of sample when decompacted (cm) | • Frame area (m2) |
| • Sediment porosity (Volume water/total volume; %) | • Dominating plant species |
| • Sediment water content (mass of water/total mass; %) | • Type of biomass |
| • Sediment dry bulk density (g cm−3) | • Wet weight (g) |
| • Organic matter content (OM) (%) | • Dry weight (g) |
| • OC (% (dry weight)) | • Biomass (g m−2) |
| • OC (g C cm−3 (dry weight)) | • OC (% (dry weight)) |
| • Carbon stable isotope (ẟ13C in ‰) ratio | • Total Nitrogen (TN) content (% (dry weight)) |
| • Total nitrogen (TN) content (% (dry weight)) | • Carbon stable isotope (ẟ13C in ‰) ratio |
| • Total nitrogen (TN) content (g N cm−3) | • Nitrogen stable isotope (ẟ15N in ‰) ratio |
| • Nitrogen stable isotope (ẟ15N in ‰) ratio | • Description of biomass collection |
| • Total phosphorus (TP) content (% (dry weight)) | • Methods for how data were obtained |
| • Total phosphorus (TP) content (g P cm−3 (dry weight)) | • Data originator |
| • Carbon Reactivity Index (CRI) (ranging from 0 (Organic matter is fully biodegradable) to 1 (Organic matter is non-biodegradable) | • Originator institution |
| • Core dating: | • Contact of data originator |
| o Mass accumulation rate (g cm−2 year−1) | • Publications |
| o Sediment accumulation rate (mm year−1) | |
| o Carbon accumulation rate (g C m−2 year−1) | |
| o Total 210Pb activity (Bq kg−1) | |
| o Excess 210Pb activity (Bq kg−1) | |
| o Supported 210Pb activity (Bq kg−1) | |
| o 14C age (years) and 14C material | |
| • Sediment grain size (<0.063 mm, 0.063-0.25 mm, 0.25-0.5 mm, 0.5-1 mm, >1 mm) | |
| • Methods for how data were obtained as well as the sediment sampling device | |
| • Data originator | |
| • Originator institution | |
| • Contact of data originator | |
The field and analytical procedures applied to collect the data included in EURO-CARBON varied depending on the research focus and demands as well as technical capability. Although the variability of techniques and strategies may, to some extent, have impacted the measured sediment variables, we assume that given the large amount of data, such effects will not affect overall patterns in the data. Sampling techniques used to collect sediment include a range of sediment corer types (piston corer, box corer etc.). Sample decompaction and, at greater water depths depressurization, can impact the intactness of the obtained sediment cores and thereby the results; decompaction information is added where available.
Following sampling, retrieved sediment were typically divided into fixed sections based on depth ranges relevant to the study focus. After core retrieval and sectioning, sediment physical properties (e.g. grain size, and density) were in some instances measured. These physical properties reflect the geological and physical environment of the collected sediment, which also influences the chemical and biological processes within the sediments. Sediment porosity, defined as the volume of water-filled void space in relation to the total volume, was calculated from the weight loss upon drying of a sediment core segment of known weight and volume. The water content of the sediment core segments was calculated as the mass loss after drying divided by the bulk mass. The grain size distribution is important as it describes the study site’s geological setting and geochemical conditions, and can be used to distinguish sediment transport mechanisms and determines the porosity, especially in fine-grained sediment where porosity is controlled by grain size and mineralogy [2]. Grain size is commonly measured using a particle size analyser, such as a Laser Granulometer.
Dry bulk density (DBD) is defined as the mass of the total dry sediment divided by the total sample volume. The DBD is used to obtain volume-based OC stocks, and is calculated by dividing the weight of the dried sediment by the total volume of the wet sample. Overall, the DBD varies from close to 1 (high porosity sediment) to > 2 (low porosity sediments) and it is commonly determined by sampling a known volume of sediment and drying the sediment to a constant weight.
The two most common methods used to determine sediment OC content rely on conversion of OC into CO2 using either wet chemical or high-temperature oxidation techniques. More detailed descriptions of the analytical steps and methods used for marine sediments can be found in previous studies [13]. Briefly, the wet oxidation technique uses chemicals (such as potassium dichromate and sulfuric acid) to convert OC into CO2, which is subsequently quantified. The high-temperature oxidation technique, as used in a CHN-analyser [13], uses a "flash combustion'' of sediment OC to CO2, which is then detected using an infrared gas analyser or thermal conductivity detector. Both the wet oxidation and high-temperature oxidation techniques rely upon the separation of organic from inorganic carbon forms for an accurate quantification of OC. Earlier studies achieved the separation of inorganic carbon and OC by heating the sample (above 1050°C). More recently, acidification has been used to remove carbonates [13], but caution is needed as adding too much acid can lead to particle dissolution and loss of OC. OC data obtained in high-carbonate sediments, such as mussel beds and shell sand, might have a higher analytical error due to the potentially incomplete removal of carbonates (e.g., ([13]).
Determining sediment total nitrogen (TN) content relies, as for OC, on either a wet chemical oxidation or high-temperature oxidation technique. In the wet chemical oxidation approach, both organic and inorganic nitrogen compounds are oxidised to inorganic nutrients which are subsequently quantified through a colorimetric method [14]. In the high-temperature combustion approach, TN concentrations are determined based on conversion into nitrogen oxides, which are then determined by chemiluminescent emission using a nitric oxide detector or using a thermal conductivity detector. The high-temperature technique generally measures the OC and TN content simultaneously on the same sample as the analysers are fitted in series on a CHN elemental analyser [13]. Phosphorus forms in marine sediments are redox-dependent. When oxic conditions prevail, substantial amounts of phosphorus are retained in the sediment through adsorption to iron oxides (e.g., ([15]). In contrast, when anoxic conditions are present, organic forms dominate. Therefore, in studies focusing on sediment phosphorus, often several different phosphorus forms are measured [15]. The total phosphorus (TP) data included in EURO-CARBON were generally determined by initially using a digestion (e.g., microwave or high temperature) and/or a chemical digestion step [15]. Thereafter, the total inorganic phosphorus concentrations can be determined.
The stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) have frequently been used to determine the organic matter origin (e.g., marine vs. terrestrial origin; see [16]), and are commonly analysed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) or isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS), often coupled in series with a CHN elemental analyser [17].
To report sediment accumulation rates as well as the age of the sediment, two dating techniques are commonly considered: analysing the sediment content of lead-210 (210Pb) or Carbon-14 (14C). The 210Pb-dating is conducted using gamma or alpha spectrometry and the decay of excess 210Pb activity is used to determine the sediment accumulation rate [18]. This method can be used to determine sediment deposits that are up to approximately 100 years old. The 14C-dating technique is based on the fact that living organisms incorporate radioactive carbon from the environment. When they die, no new carbon is incorporated and the accumulated 14C starts to decay. Thus, the known half-life of the 14C isotope can be used together with the content to determine the time since the OC was produced [19]. The method can date organic materials up to around 50,000 years old [19].
The carbon reactivity index (CRI) ranges from zero (fully reactive) to 1 (not reactive) and has in some studies been used to distinguish OC fractions depending on their thermal lability, which is suggested to be indicative of OC biodegradability [20].
Compilation and open sharing of existing data for important biogeochemical variables are relevant for determining large-scale patterns and potential drivers of OC accumulation and storage. In addition, does the limited spatial extent of sediment data across the seafloor, for example, has hampered the assessment of OC storage and its sensitivity to fisheries and other anthropogenic pressures. Therefore data products such as EURO-Carbon are highly warranted by both the research and policy communities.
The EURO-CARBON database was established so that the data should be findable, freely accessible and reusable. In addition, it constitutes an open-source quality-controlled dataset which can facilitate further detailed analysis using, for example, statistical or modelling tools.
From this initial overview of data, we identified potential future efforts which could improve the usefulness of large datasets such as EURO-CARBON. Firstly, measuring additional ancillary data such as DBD and sediment nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) content are recommended in future studies. Such ancillary data are often missing in the present dataset but are not only important to provide context and understand the processes driving sediment OC content, but variables such as DBD are also essential for calculating precise volume-based OC stocks. Additionally, our compilation highlights a clear spatial and potential geographic bias, with limited sampling in some parts of the European regional seas. This data gap needs to be addressed to provide a more accurate understanding of what controls sediment OC contents over larger spatial and temporal scales. Furthermore, there is a clear need for broad temporal and spatial datasets, which could capture both natural variability and potential human impacts in specific locations. This is vital as humans are directly impacting sediment OC cycling and storage through a range of direct mechanisms such as trawling and dredging, and indirectly through climate-related changes. We also recommend regular inter-calibration exercises for methods used to collect standard sediment variables, such as DBD, OC and nutrient content. Such inter-calibration efforts could ensure that the obtained data is comparable across different studies and study regions.
Limitations
Not applicable.
Ethics Statement
The authors have read and follow the ethical requirements for publication in Data in Brief and confirming that the current work does not involve human subjects, animal experiments, or any data collected from social media platforms.
Acknowledgments
CRediT Author Statement
C.L., A.E.L.G., A.M.A and D.K.J. started the initiative for data compilation and standardised the obtained data. All co-authors contributed data to the compilation. C.L. drafted the first version of the current manuscript with input from all coauthors.
Acknowledgements
AELG, CL, AMA, MJC, SLP and DKJ acknowledge funding from MPA Europe under the HORIZON EUROPE Framework Program (Grant Agreement 101059988). DKJ, HG, KH and NM acknowledge funding by the European Union under the Horizon Europe program through OBAMA-NEXT (Grant Agreement no. 101081642). HG, KH and NM acknowledge funding by the European Union under the Horizon Europe program through C-BLUES (Grant Agreement no. 101137844). HG, KH, JT, KG and SF acknowledge funding from Norwegian Blue Forest Network (www.nbfn.no); GB, HG, and KH acknowledge funding from the Norwegian Environment Agency through KELPCOAST (grant number 24087438). MEA, MB, MD and MG acknowledge funding from the foundation for Baltic and East European studies (Östersjöstiftelsen) (grant numbers: 21-GP-0005 and 21-PD2-0002) and FORMAS (grant number: 2021-01280). DB, NB, VK and SK acknowledge funding from BRIDGE-BS (Grant Agreement 101000240) and the LTER-BG infrastructure (Agreement No. DО1-320/30.11.2023, National Roadmap for Research Infrastructure, financed by the Ministry of Education and Science of Bulgaria). CPS, WKL, NAGMvH and OMZ acknowledge funding by the ERC Synergy grant MARIX (8540088) and the Netherlands Earth System Science Center (NESSC 024002001), financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW). WKL acknowledges funding by the Dutch Research Council (NWO VI.Veni.222.332). IM was supported by a Juan de la Cierva Incorporación postdoctoral fellowship of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (JC2020-045917-I). MRE acknowledges funding from the LIFE Programme under the project LIFE ADAPTA BLUES (LIFE18/CCA/ES/001160). K.Kuliński acknowledges funding from the Polish National Science Center, grant no. 2023/49/B/ST10/02690, under the project ALKALIS. K.Koziorowska acknowledges funding from the Polish National Science Center, grant no. 2019/34/E/ST10/00167, under the project PROSPECTOR and the European Union within the Horizon Europe programme, project 101136480 — SEA-Quester. J.M.N. acknowledges the support of national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT), under the projects UIDB/04292/2020, UIDP/04292/2020, granted to MARE, and LA/P/0069/2020, granted to the Associate Laboratory ARNET. CBdlS, RS, and MM received Portuguese national funds from FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology through projects UIDB/04326/2020, UIDP/04326/2020, LA/P/0101/2020, 2020.03825.CEECIND, and 020.06996.BD. SC acknowledges the support from MARCO-BOLO, funded by the European Union under the Horizon Europe Programme (Grant Agreement No. 101082021). M.A.M and O.S. were supported by I+D+i projects RYC2019-027073-I funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER, and MEDCHANGE funded by AEI. E.T.A., C.A.G-E, P.T.E. acknowledge funding by DRESSAGE (MIS5045792, Operational Program ‘Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation’, EPAnEK 2014-2020, NSRF), and LIFE-TRANSFER (LIFE 19 NAT/IT/000264) projects. N.P.J. was supported by a Juan de la Cierva fellowship (JDC2022-048342-I). MF was funded by Juan de La Cierva Formación (FJC2019-038970-I) and PTA2022-021307-I, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by FSE+. SP is supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione project (PZ00P2_223468). AMR received the support of a fellowship from ”la Caixa” Foundation (LCF/BQ/PI23/11970014)” and project CNS2023-145492 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033 y European Union “NextGenerationEU”/PRTR. AIS and AIL were supported by Portuguese funds through Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT)/MCTES, under the project PORBIOTA, and the UID Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e Mar (CESAM) + LA/P/0094/2020; and AIS through the contract DOI:10.54499/CEECIND/00962/2017/CP1459/CT0008.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Footnotes
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2025.111595.
Appendix. Supplementary materials
Data Availability
References
- 1.LaRowe D.E., Arndt S., Bradley J.A., Estes E.R., Hoarfrost A., Lang S.Q., Lloyd K.G., Mahmoudi N., Orsi W.D., Shah Walter S.R., Steen A.D., Zhao R. The fate of organic carbon in marine sediments - new insights from recent data and analysis. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2020;204 doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Burdige D.J. Princeton University Press; Princeton: 2007. Geochemistry of Marine Sediments. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Howard J., Sutton-Grier A.E., Smart L.S., Lopes C.C., Hamilton J., Kleypas J., Simpson S., McGowan J., Pessarrodona A., Alleway H.K., Landis E. Blue carbon pathways for climate mitigation: known, emerging and unlikely. Mar. Policy. 2023;156 doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105788. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goni M.A., Monacci N., Gisewhite R., Ogston A., Crockett J., Nittrouer C. Distribution and sources of particulate organic matter in the water column and sediments of the Fly River Delta, Gulf of Papua (Papua New Guinea) Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2006;69(1):225–245. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.04.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith R.W., Bianchi T.S., Allison M., Savage C., Galy V. High rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally. Nat. Geosci. 2015;8(6):450–453. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gagnon K., Thormar J., Fredriksen S., Potouroglou M., Albretsen J., Gundersen H., Hancke K., Rinde E., Wathne C., Norderhaug K.M. Carbon stocks in Norwegian eelgrass meadows across environmental gradients. Sci. Rep. 2024;14(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74760-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boynton W.R., Ceballos M.A.C., Bailey E.M., Hodgkins C.L.S., Humphrey J.L., Testa J.M. Oxygen and nutrient exchanges at the sediment-water interface: a global synthesis and critique of estuarine and coastal data. Estuar. Coasts. 2018;41(2):301–333. doi: 10.1007/s12237-017-0275-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oguri K., Masqué P., Zabel M., Stewart H.A., MacKinnon G., Rowden A.A., Berg P., Wenzhöfer F., Glud R.N. Sediment accumulation and carbon burial in four hadal trench systems. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosciences. 2022;127(10) doi: 10.1029/2022JG006814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maxwell T.L., Rovai A.S., Adame M.F., Adams J.B., Álvarez-Rogel J., Austin W.E.N., Beasy K., Boscutti F., Böttcher M.E., Bouma T.J., Bulmer R.H., Burden A., Burke S.A., Camacho S., Chaudhary D.R., Chmura G.L., Copertino M., Cott G.M., Craft C., Day J., de los Santos C.B., Denis L., Ding W., Ellison J.C., Ewers Lewis C.J., Giani L., Gispert M., Gontharet S., González-Pérez J.A., González-Alcaraz M.N., Gorham C., Graversen A.E.L., Grey A., Guerra R., He Q., Holmquist J.R., Jones A.R., Juanes J.A., Kelleher B.P., Kohfeld K.E., Krause-Jensen D., Lafratta A., Lavery P.S., Laws E.A., Leiva-Dueñas C., Loh P.S., Lovelock C.E., Lundquist C.J., Macreadie P.I., Mazarrasa I., Megonigal J.P., Neto J.M., Nogueira J., Osland M.J., Pagès J.F., Perera N., Pfeiffer E.-M., Pollmann T., Raw J.L., Recio M., Ruiz-Fernández A.C., Russell S.K., Rybczyk J.M., Sammul M., Sanders C., Santos R., Serrano O., Siewert M., Smeaton C., Song Z., Trasar-Cepeda C., Twilley R.R., Van de Broek M., Vitti S., Antisari L.V., Voltz B., Wails C.N., Ward R.D., Ward M., Wolfe J., Yang R., Zubrzycki S., Landis E., Smart L., Spalding M., Worthington T.A. Global dataset of soil organic carbon in tidal marshes. Sci. Data. 2023;10(1):797. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02633-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fry B. Springer; 2006. Stable Isotope Ecology. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Santisteban J.I., Mediavilla R., López-Pamo E., Dabrio C.J., Zapata M.B.R., García M.J.G., Castaño S., Martínez-Alfaro P.E. Loss on ignition: a qualitative or quantitative method for organic matter and carbonate mineral content in sediments? J. Paleolimnol. 2004;32(3):287–299. doi: 10.1023/B:JOPL.0000042999.30131.5b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Frangipane G., Pistolato M., Molinaroli E., Guerzoni S., Tagliapietra D. Comparison of loss on ignition and thermal analysis stepwise methods for determination of sedimentary organic matter. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2009;19(1):24–33. doi: 10.1002/aqc.970. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Verardo D.J., Froelich P.N., McIntyre A. Determination of organic carbon and nitrogen in marine sediments using the Carlo Erba NA-1500 analyzer. Deep Sea Res. A. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1990;37(1):157–165. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(90)90034-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Avramidis P., Nikolaou K., Bekiari V. Total organic carbon and total nitrogen in sediments and soils: a comparison of the wet oxidation – titration method with the combustion-infrared method. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia. 2015;4:425–430. doi: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.03.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ruttenberg K.C. Development of a sequential extraction method for different forms of phosphorus in marine sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1992;37(7):1460–1482. doi: 10.4319/lo.1992.37.7.1460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Thornton S.F., McManus J. Application of organic carbon and nitrogen stable isotope and c/n ratios as source indicators of organic matter provenance in estuarine systems: evidence from the Tay Estuary, Scotland. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 1994;38(3):219–233. doi: 10.1006/ecss.1994.1015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kennedy P., Kennedy H., Papadimitriou S. The effect of acidification on the determination of organic carbon, total nitrogen and their stable isotopic composition in algae and marine sediment. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005;19(8):1063–1068. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sanchez-Cabeza J.A., Masqué P., Ani-Ragolta I. 210Pb and210Po analysis in sediments and soils by microwave acid digestion. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1998;227(1):19–22. doi: 10.1007/BF02386425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hughen K.A. In: Developments in Marine Geology. Hillaire–Marcel C., De Vernal A., editors. Elsevier; 2007. Chapter five radiocarbon dating of deep-sea sediments; pp. 185–210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kristensen E. Characterization of biogenic organic matter by stepwise thermogravimetry (STG) Biogeochemistry. 1990;9(2):135–159. doi: 10.1007/BF00692169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


