Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 May 21;27(22):5754–5759. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c01516

Generation and Use of Cyclopropenyllithium under Continuous Flow Conditions

Francesco Soddu , Iktedar Mahdi , Maria Chiara Cabua †,, Francesco Secci , Philipp Natho , Riccardo Tassoni †,§, Paolo Dambruoso §, Ernesto Mesto , Marco Colella , Renzo Luisi †,*
PMCID: PMC12150322  PMID: 40398863

Abstract

The cyclopropene scaffold has emerged as a valuable platform in modern synthesis. Here, we present a streamlined flow-based approach for the generation of cyclopropenyllithium and its functionalization with various electrophiles in a single, continuous flow process. This method eliminates the need for laborious temperature changes and cryogenic conditions, and significantly reduces the process time from starting material to products. Compared to traditional batch processes, our flow approach enables the use of a single organolithium reagent and operates efficiently at 0 °C, avoiding the cool-warm-cool temperature cycles typical of batch methods. This not only simplifies the workflow but also enhances practicality, scalability, and extends the accessible chemical space.


graphic file with name ol5c01516_0006.jpg


graphic file with name ol5c01516_0005.jpg


Cyclopropenes are a fascinating class of strained, three-membered carbocyclic compounds characterized by the presence of a highly reactive carbon–carbon double bond. Their unique structural features, including significant ring strain (approximately 55 kcal/mol) and enhanced π-orbital bending, contribute to their remarkable reactivity, making them valuable intermediates in organic synthesis. The chemistry of cyclopropenes is primarily guided by their intrinsic ring strain and the electronic properties of the substituents attached to the ring. These compounds readily undergo a variety of transformations, including cycloadditions, rearrangements, and nucleophilic additions, often proceeding under mild conditions due to the release of strain energy. Notably, cyclopropenes are key intermediates in transition-metal-catalyzed reactions, including metal-carbene chemistry and cyclization processes that lead to the formation of more complex molecular architectures. Cyclopropenes have found extensive applications in modern synthetic methodologies, including the development of pharmaceuticals, natural product synthesis, and materials chemistry. Their ability to undergo controlled functionalization allows for the construction of highly diverse molecular scaffolds. Additionally, in recent years, bioorthogonal chemistry has leveraged the reactivity of cyclopropenes in strain-promoted reactions, further expanding their utility in chemical biology. The main strategies for accessing cyclopropenes rely on efficient and selective synthetic approaches developed in recent decades. Among the established methods, transition metal-catalyzed cyclopropenation of alkynes with diazo compounds is widely employed, offering high selectivity and functional group tolerance. Additionally, dehydrohalogenation of gem-dihalocyclopropanes serves as a practical strategy, especially for the synthesis of substituted cyclopropenes. In this context, lithiated cyclopropenes Cp-Li represent valuable intermediates for the synthesis of suitably functionalized cyclopropenes that can undergo further transformations. The introduction of a lithium atom at the cyclopropene ring generates a highly strained and nucleophilic species, which can undergo electrophilic trapping, rearrangements, and cross-coupling reactions. The generation of lithiated cyclopropenes is typically achieved via direct lithiation using organolithium reagents, such as butyllithium, or most typically by metal–halogen exchange starting from readily available halogenated cyclopropenes. Due to the significant ring strain and the presence of the π-system, these species exhibit unique reactivity patterns compared to other organolithium compounds. Notably, lithiated cyclopropenes are instrumental in the development of novel synthetic methodologies, particularly in the formation of functionalized cyclopropanes and their derivatives, which are valuable motifs in medicinal and materials chemistry. Recently, Waser reported for the first time a σ-type cyclopropenium cation equivalent leveraging on Cp-Li as key reactants (Scheme , A). In addition, Vicente developed an elegant synthesis of housanes from hydroxyalkylated cyclpropenes obtained using once again Cp-Li as the key intermediate. Other remarkable contributions on the use of lithiated cyclopropenes have been reported by Marek. One of the widely employed method for the generation of Cp-Li, is by a lithium/halogen exchange reaction of trihalocyclopropanes which can be easily obtained from the reaction of haloolefins and a dihalocarbene.

1. Use of Cp-Li and Generation of Cp-Li in Batch and Flow.

1

The reported experimental protocol for the generation of Cp-Li uses n-BuLi as lithiating agent, THF or Et2O as the solvent and three laborious warm-cool sequences before final quenching with electrophilic partners (Scheme , B). However, scaling up this batch protocol for the synthesis and functionalization of cyclopropenes presents significant challenges and fails to meet the increasingly stringent sustainability and environmental impact requirements of the modern chemical industry. In this context, the adoption of modern technologies, such as flow chemistry, is crucial for developing synthetic processes that are more sustainable, efficient, and safe. Building on our expertise in flow chemistry, we present a straightforward and streamlined approach for the generation of Cp-Li and its subsequent functionalization with electrophiles in a continuous-flow fashion, starting from readily available trihalocyclopropanes. This flow process employs a single organolithium reagent, n-BuLi, and operates at significantly higher temperatures than traditional batch methods, eliminating the need for warm-cool cycles and enhancing both practicality and scalability. Remarkably, the competitive degradation pathways of Cp-Li are completely suppressed under flow conditions (Scheme , C). Accordingly, our investigation began using the flow setup reported in Table , consisting of two T-mixers (M1 and M2), each followed by a coil (R1 and R2) with volumes of 0.78 and 1.18 mL, respectively. Starting with trihalocyclopropane 1a, and using n-BuLi, the putative Cp-Li was generated in M1 and R1 and then transferred to M2, where it reacted with benzophenone, selected as a model electrophile, to yield cyclopropene 2a.

1. Optimization Study.

graphic file with name ol5c01516_0004.jpg

graphic file with name ol5c01516_0008.jpg

a

NMR yields calculated using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard.

b

Clogging observed.

c

Reaction conducted using the traditional batch procedure with quenching at 0 °C.

The optimization study revealed the independency of reaction performances from benzophenone/tribromocyclopropane 1a ratio (Table , entries 1–3) and highlighted the temperature as a game changer parameter: lowering it to −20 °C furnished 2a in 65% yield, whereas conducting the Cp-Li generation at room temperature (25 °C) caused clogging of the flow system (Table , entries 3–5). The residence time in R2 (tR2) left the reaction outcome unaffected (Table , entry 6). Conversely, the residence time in R1 (tR1) was a crucial parameter for the complete lithium/bromine exchange reaction to generate Cp-Li. Reducing tR1 from 15 to 7.5 s led to a significant drop in the yield of 2a (Table , entries 3,7–8). On the contrary, increasing tR1 to 30 s improved the yield to 80% (Table , entry 9). However, further extending the residence time to 60 s resulted in a lower yield of 52% (Table , entry 10). Additionally, performing the reaction via the traditional batch procedure, where Cp-Li was generated and subsequently quenched at 0 °C with the electrophile, resulted in a lower 43% yield of 2a (Table , entry 11). In addition, no reaction with bromobutane resulting from the Br/Li exchange reaction was observed in the absence of a pi-electrophile. Based on these results, the conditions in entry 9 were identified as optimal and used for the subsequent scope exploration (Scheme ). First, aryl-substituted tribromocyclopropanes 1b–d were evaluated in the reaction with benzophenone, affording the corresponding cyclopropene products 2b–d in moderate to good yields (45–72%). These results demonstrate the feasibility of extending the protocol to other aromatic systems. Subsequently, the use of 1a with various aromatic ketones delivered the corresponding cyclopropenes 2e–g in good yields. Likewise, reactions with enolizable and aliphatic ketones successfully produced adducts 2h–k in good to excellent yields, reaching up to 80%. The protocol was also compatible with trifluoromethyl ketones, as exemplified by the formation of cyclopropene 2l in 76% yield. Moreover, imines were found to be competent electrophiles, leading to amino-cyclopropenes 2m and 2n in yields that varied depending on the nature of the substituent. Notably, cyclopropene 2n, bearing a CF3 group on the imine carbon, was obtained in 67%.

2. Scope of the Continuous Flow Generation and Electrophilic Trapping of Cp-Li .

2

The use of alkyl-substituted cyclopropenes was also demonstrated to be feasible under continuous flow conditions. Specifically, 1,1,2-tribromo-2,3,3-trimethylcyclopropane 1e was successfully lithiated under optimized flow conditions to generate the corresponding cyclopropenyllithium intermediate (Cp-Li), which was subsequently reacted with aromatic ketones to afford cyclopropenes 2o–2q in yields of up to 98% (Scheme ). Similarly, the use of enolizable ketones provided derivatives 2r–2t in good yields, confirming the versatility of the method. A cyclopropyl-substituted Weinreb amide also served as a competent electrophile, affording the corresponding cyclopropenyl ketone 2v in a moderate 31% yield, likely due to the inherent instability of the product. In contrast, imines reacted only marginally with Cp-Li derived from 1e, yielding products 2w–y in good to modest yields. Notably, these low-yielding compounds were difficult to obtain under traditional batch conditions, where yields remained below 10%. Interestingly, both benzaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde reacted efficiently, providing derivatives 2z and 2aa in 45% and 60% yield, respectively. To further highlight the versatility of the flow methodology, we explored its application to functionalized electrophiles derived from natural products or bioactive compounds (Scheme ). Notably, reactions with Camphor and Carvone afforded the corresponding functionalized cyclopropenes 3a and 3b in 44% and 46% yield, respectively, and no conjugate addition products have been observed (the observed modest yields are likely due to enol/aldol side reactions). Remarkably, the use of an imine derived from the COX-2 inhibitor Celecoxib delivered the desired adduct 3c in 80% yield. Similarly, the lipid-lowering drug Fenofibrate underwent selective addition at the carbonyl group, furnishing product 3d in 58% yield. Finally, Cholestenone reacted to provide adduct 3e in 49% yield.

As a final assessment, to demonstrate the superior performance of the flow process over the traditional batch procedure, we conducted a benchmarking study using selected literature-reported compounds (Scheme ). Specifically, we compared productivity, space-time yields, and overall process time for the synthesis of cyclopropenes 2a, 2h, 2r, 2s, and 2z, all performed at the same scale in both batch and flow conditions. Remarkably, the flow methodology consistently outperformed batch processing, delivering significantly higher productivity (up to 400% enhancement), improved space-time yields (up to 270 fold), and a notable reduction in process time (−57% reduced time). As a representative example, compound 1a was processed on a 1.2 g scale using just 21 min of continuous flow processing, affording the product in 80% yield. This corresponds to a productivity of 1.63 g/h, effectively doubling the reported productivity of the corresponding batch protocol. While certain substrates (e.g., 2z) showed reduced yields in flow compared to batch, the flow process’s consistent reproducibility and superior performance overall establish its advantage over batch operations. In conclusion, we have developed the first flow-based method for the generation of Cp-Li, followed by its efficient electrophilic functionalization. The flow process enables the safe and straightforward handling of n-BuLi as the sole organolithium reagent, even at elevated temperatures (0 °C), representing a clear advancement over traditional batch protocols. This approach delivers higher yields, enhanced productivity, and significantly reduced reaction and processing times. Moreover, the method proved applicable to a range of bioactive and functionalized electrophiles, displaying a high degree of chemoselectivity. Overall, this strategy provides a streamlined and versatile platform for the synthesis of cyclopropenyl derivatives, addressing the growing demand for novel structural motifs in drug discovery and contributing to the development of more sustainable synthetic methodologies.

3. Benchmarking Reported Batch Processing vs Flow Protocol.

3

Supplementary Material

ol5c01516_si_001.pdf (6.4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

I.M. and R.L. acknowledges funding from the European Commission’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme through the Marie Skłodowska-Curie doctoral network “GreenDigiPharma” (Grant Agreement No. 101073089). P.N. acknowledges European Commission’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme through the Marie Skłodowska-Curie action MSCA-PF, Grant Agreement ExpandFlow No. 101106497. Prof. E. Schingaro is acknowledged for the use of the Single Crystal X-ray Facility at the Department of Earth and Geoenvironmental Sciences, University of Bari.

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.5c01516.

  • Copy of 1H, 19F, and 13C NMR of the prepared molecules and X-ray data (PDF)

#.

F.S. and I.M. contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. a Panda B.. Small-Ring Metathesis: Delights and Difficulties. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018;7:2386–2396. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201800515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Row R. D., Prescher J. A.. Constructing New Bioorthogonal Reagents and Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018;51(5):1073–1081. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Dian L., Marek I.. Asymmetric Preparation of Polysubstituted Cyclopropanes Based on Direct Functionalization of Achiral Three-Membered Carbocycles. Chem. Rev. 2018;118(18):8415–8434. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Marichev K. O., Doyle M. P.. Catalytic asymmetric cycloaddition reactions of enoldiazo compounds. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019;17:4183–4195. doi: 10.1039/C9OB00478E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. a Rubin M., Rubina M., Gevorgyan V.. Recent advances in cyclopropene chemistry. Synthesis. 2006;2006:1221–1245. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Marek I., Simaan S., Masarwa A.. Enantiomerically Enriched Cyclopropene Derivatives: Versatile Building Blocks in Asymmetric Synthesis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46(39):7364–7376. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Rubin M., Rubina M., Gevorgyan V.. Transition Metal Chemistry of Cyclopropenes and Cyclopropanes. Chem. Rev. 2007;107(7):3117–3179. doi: 10.1021/cr050988l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Zhu Z.-B., Wei Y., Shi M.. Recent developments of cyclopropene chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:5534–5563. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15074j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Gahtory D., Sen R., Kuzmyn A. R., Escorihuela J., Zuilhof H.. Strain-Promoted Cycloaddition of Cyclopropenes with o-Quinones: A Rapid Click Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2018;57(32):10118–10122. doi: 10.1002/anie.201800937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Kikuchi T., Yasui T., Yamamoto Y.. Cycloaddition of Cyclopropenes with Alkynes via Carbon–Carbon Double Bond Cleavage Enabled by a Ruthenium Catalyst: Synthesis of Cyclopentadienes and Cycloheptatrienes. ACS Catal. 2023;13(14):9656–9666. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Smyrnov V., Waser J.. Semipinacol Rearrangement of Cyclopropenylcarbinols for the Synthesis of Highly Substituted Cyclopropanes. Org. Lett. 2023;25:6999–7003. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c02543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Archambeau A., Miege F., Meyer C., Cossy J.. Intramolecular Cyclopropanation and C–H Insertion Reactions with Metal Carbenoids Generated from Cyclopropenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;48(4):1021–1031. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Fu B., Bai W., Li Y., Jiang W.. Synthesis and aromaticity of metallacyclopropene complexes. Chem. Commun. 2024;60:12816–12829. doi: 10.1039/D4CC04401K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Vicente R.. C–C Bond Cleavages of Cyclopropenes: Operating for Selective Ring-Opening Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2021;121(1):162–226. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. a Patterson D. M., Nazarova L. A., Xie B., Kamber D. N., Prescher J. A.. Functionalized Cyclopropenes As Bioorthogonal Chemical Reporters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134(45):18638–18643. doi: 10.1021/ja3060436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Smith N. J., Rohlfing K., Sawicki L. A., Kharkar P. M., Boyd S. J., Kloxin A. M., Fox J. M.. Fast, irreversible modification of cysteines through strain releasing conjugate additions of cyclopropenyl ketones. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018;16:2164–2169. doi: 10.1039/C8OB00166A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Natho P., Rouse A. B., Greenfield J. K., Allen L. A.T., White A. J.P., Yang Z., Parsons P. J.. Regioselective synthesis of 1- and 4-tetralones from heteroaryl-3-cyclobutanols. Tetrahedron. 2020;76:131636. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2020.131636. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. a Wørmer G. J., Hansen B. K., Palmfeldt J., Poulsen T. B.. A Cyclopropene Electrophile that Targets Glutathione S-Transferase Omega-1 in Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58(34):11918–11922. doi: 10.1002/anie.201907520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Tu H.-F., Jeandin A., Bon C., Brocklehurst C., Lima F., Suero M. G.. Late-Stage Aryl C–H Bond Cyclopropenylation with Cyclopropenium Cations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62(36):e202308379. doi: 10.1002/anie.202308379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Lou Y., Horikawa M., Kloster R. A., Hawryluk N. A., Corey E. J.. A New Chiral Rh­(II) Catalyst for Enantioselective [2 + 1]-Cycloaddition. Mechanistic Implications and Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:8916–8918. doi: 10.1021/ja047064k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Briones J. F., Davies H. M. L.. Silver triflate-catalyzed cyclopropenation of internal alkynes with donor-/acceptor-substituted diazo compounds. Org. Lett. 2011;13:3984–3987. doi: 10.1021/ol201503j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. a Magid R. M., Clarke T. C., Duncan C. D.. An Efficient and Convenient Synthesis of 1-Methylcyclopropene. J. Org. Chem. 1971;36(9):1320–1321. doi: 10.1021/jo00808a041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Fisher F., Applequist D. E.. Synthesis of 1-Methylcyclopropene. J. Org. Chem. 1965;30(6):2089–2090. doi: 10.1021/jo01017a531. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Sherrill W. M., Kim R., Rubin M.. Synthesis of Cyclopropenes via 1,2-Elimination of Bromocyclopropanes Catalyzed by Crown Ether. Synthesis. 2009;2009:1477–1484. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1088122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. a Liao L.-a., Yan N., Fox J. M.. Dianion Approach to Chiral Cyclopropene Carboxylic Acids. Org. Lett. 2004;6:4937–4939. doi: 10.1021/ol047837+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Fisher L. A., Fox J. M.. Studies on the Stability of Cycloprop-2-ene Carboxylate Dianions and Reactions with Electrophiles. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:8474–8478. doi: 10.1021/jo801683n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li X., Wodrich M. D., Waser J.. Accessing elusive σ-type cyclopropenium cation equivalents through redox gold catalysis. Nat. Chem. 2024;16:901–912. doi: 10.1038/s41557-024-01535-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. a Coto D., Suárez-García D., Mata S., Fernández I., López L. A., Vicente R.. From Cyclopropene to Housane Derivatives Via Intramolecular Cyclopropanation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024;63(46):e202409226. doi: 10.1002/anie.202409226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Suárez-García D., Rodríguez M. A., Barbolla I., Vicente R.. Synthesis of Fused-Housane Derivatives via Intramolecular [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition. Org. Lett. 2025;27:3825. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c00468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. a Simaan S., Masarwa A., Zohar E., Stanger A., Bertus P., Marek I.. Cyclopropenylcarbinol Derivatives as New Versatile Intermediates in Organic Synthesis: Application to the Formation of Enantiomerically Pure Alkylidenecyclopropane Derivatives. Chem.Eur. J. 2009;15(34):8449–8464. doi: 10.1002/chem.200901074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Basheer A., Mishima M., Marek I.. Regioselective Carbon–Carbon Bond Cleavage in the Oxidation of Cyclopropenylcarbinols. Org. Lett. 2011;13(15):4076–4079. doi: 10.1021/ol201581c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. a Baird M. S., Hussain H. H., Nethercott W.. The preparation and lithiation of 1-halogenocyclopropenes. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1986;1:1845–1853. doi: 10.1039/p19860001845. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Baird M. S., Fitton H. L., Clegg W., McCamley A.. (R)-1,3-dimethylcyclopropeneone isomer of the smallest chiral hydrocarbon. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1993;1:321–326. doi: 10.1039/P19930000321. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Miege F., Meyer C., Cossy J.. Synthesis of 3-Oxa- and 3-Azabicyclo[4.1.0]­Heptanes by Gold-Catalyzed Cycloisomerization of Cyclopropenes. Org. Lett. 2010;12:4144–4147. doi: 10.1021/ol101741f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. a Ince M. C., Benyahia B., Vilé G.. Sustainability and Techno-Economic Assessment of Batch and Flow Chemistry in Seven Industrial Pharmaceutical Processes. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2025;13(7):2864–2874. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c09289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Newman S. G., Jensen K. F.. The role of flow in green chemistry and engineering. Green Chem. 2013;15:1456–1472. doi: 10.1039/c3gc40374b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Thomassen G., Van Dael M., Van Passel S., You F.. How to assess the potential of emerging green technologies? Towards a prospective environmental and techno-economic assessment framework. Green Chem. 2019;21:4868–4886. doi: 10.1039/C9GC02223F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Capaldo L., Wen Z., Noel T.. Chem. Science. 2023;14:4230–4247. doi: 10.1039/D3SC00992K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Laybourn A., Robertson K., Slater A.. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:4355–4365. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c13670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Natho P., Luisi R.. Flow chemistry as green technology for the genesis and use of organometallic reagents in the synthesis of key building blocks and APIs – An update. Tetrahedron Green Chem. 2023;2:100015. doi: 10.1016/j.tgchem.2023.100015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. a Natho P., Colella M., Andresini M., Degennaro L., Luisi R.. Taming 3-Oxetanyllithium Using Continuous Flow Technology. Org. Lett. 2024;26:3032–3036. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c00644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Donnelly K., Baumann M.. Advances in the Continuous Flow Synthesis of 3- and 4-Membered Ring Systems. Chem.Eur. J. 2024;30:e202400758. doi: 10.1002/chem.202400758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Spennacchio M., Colella M., Andresini M., Dibenedetto R. S., Graziano E., Aramini A., Degennaro L., Luisi R.. Unlocking Geminal Fluorohaloalkanes in Nucleophilic Fluoroalkylation Chemistry: Generation and Trapping of Lithiumfluorocarbenoids Enabled by Flow Microreactors. Chem. Commun. 2023;59:1373–1376. doi: 10.1039/D2CC06717J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Pasca F., Gelato Y., Andresini M., Serbetci D., Natho P., Romanazzi G., Degennaro L., Colella M., Luisi R.. Continuous Flow Decarboxylative Monofluoroalkylation Enabled by Photoredox Catalysis. JACS Au. 2025;5:684–692. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.4c00902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Graziano E., Natho P., Andresini M., Mastrolorito F., Mahdi I., Mesto E., Colella M., Degennaro L., Nicolotti O., Luisi R.. 1-Oxa-2,6-Diazaspiro [3.3]­heptane as a New Potential Piperazine Bioisostere–Flow-Assisted Preparation and Derivatisation by Strain-Release of Azabicyclo [1.1.0]­butanes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2024;366:3894–3902. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202400781. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Graziano E., Colella M. L., Baumann M., Luisi R.. Generation and Use of Bicyclo[1.1.0]­butyllithium under Continuous Flow Conditions. Org. Lett. 2025;27:3344–3348. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c00705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Spennacchio M., Natho P., Andresini M., Colella M.. Continuous flow generation of highly reactive organometallic intermediates: a recent update. J. Flow Chem. 2024;14:43–83. doi: 10.1007/s41981-023-00292-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; h Poletti L., Codecà N., Ragno D., Risi C. D., Toldo S., Bortolini O., Shao J., An L., Lee D., D’Agostino C., Dambruoso P., Massi A., Carmine G. D.. A Telescoped Photo-/Organo-Catalyzed Cross Dehydrogenative Coupling (CDC) between Glycine Derivatives and Ketones to Afford Nonproteinogenic Amino Acids (NPAAs) Enabled by Heterogeneous Continuous Flow Catalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024;12:15193–15202. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. a Zrinski I., Eckert-Maksic M.. Preparation of Novel Trialkylsilylated Propyne Derivatives from 3-Trimethylsilyl-3-ethoxycarbonylcyclopropene. Synth. Commun. 2003;33:4071–4077. doi: 10.1081/SCC-120026348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Zrinski I., Gadanji G., Eckert-Maksic M.. Lithiation/silylation of ethyl 2-alkyl-1-trimethylsilylcycloprop-2-ene-1-carboxylate. Experimental and computational study. New J. Chem. 2003;27:1270–1276. doi: 10.1039/b302655h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ol5c01516_si_001.pdf (6.4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.


Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES